Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Review

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-MRSA activities of extracts of some medicinal plants: A brief review

  • The increasing emergence of multidrug-resistant infection causing microorganisms has become a significant burden globally. Despite the efforts of pharmaceuticals in producing relatively new antimicrobial drugs, they have resulted in a high rate of mortality, disability and diseases across the world especially in developing countries. Supporting this claim was the report of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who estimated that over 2 million illnesses and 23,000 deaths per year are attributable to antibiotic resistant pathogens in the United States. They include Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) producing gram-negative bacilli, Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. For MRSA, resistance is as a result of Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains that have acquired Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) which carries mecA gene. The gene encodes the penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) which confers resistance to all β-lactam antibiotics. Vancomycin was previously the widely preferred drug for the treatment of MRSA infections. It is no longer the case with the emergence of S. aureus strains with reduced vancomycin sensitivity limiting the conventional treatment options for MRSA infections to very scanty expensive drugs. Presently, many researchers have reported the antibacterial activity of many plant extracts on MRSA. Hence, these medicinal plants might be promising candidates for treatment of MRSA infections. This work is a brief review on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the anti-MRSA activities of extracts of selected medicinal plants.

    Citation: Maureen U. Okwu, Mitsan Olley, Augustine O. Akpoka, Osazee E. Izevbuwa. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-MRSA activities of extracts of some medicinal plants: A brief review[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 117-137. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.117

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jasmine S. Ritschard, Lea Amato, Yadhu Kumar, Britta Müller, Leo Meile, Markus Schuppler . The role of the surface smear microbiome in the development of defective smear on surface-ripened red-smear cheese. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 622-641. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.622
    [2] Dele Raheem . Outbreaks of listeriosis associated with deli meats and cheese: an overview. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 230-250. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.230
    [3] John Samelis, Athanasia Kakouri . Hurdle factors minimizing growth of Listeria monocytogenes while counteracting in situ antilisterial effects of a novel nisin A-producing Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris costarter in thermized cheese milks. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 19-41. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.19
    [4] Moh. A'inurrofiqin, Endang Sutriswati Rahayu, Dian Anggraini Suroto, Tyas Utami, Yunika Mayangsari . Safety assessment of the indigenous probiotic strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum Kita-3 using Sprague–Dawley rats as a model. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 403-421. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022028
    [5] Napapohn Kajadpai, Jirameth Angchuan, Pannida Khunnamwong, Nantana Srisuk . Diversity of duckweed (Lemnaceae) associated yeasts and their plant growth promoting characteristics. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 486-517. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023026
    [6] Allison Yaguchi, Dyllan Rives, Mark Blenner . New kids on the block: emerging oleaginous yeast of biotechnological importance. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 227-247. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.227
    [7] Sukrita Punyauppa-path, Pongpat Kiatprasert, Jutaporn Sawaengkaew, Polson Mahakhan, Parichat Phumkhachorn, Pongsak Rattanachaikunsopon, Pannida Khunnamwong, Nantana Srisuk . Diversity of fermentative yeasts with probiotic potential isolated from Thai fermented food products. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 575-594. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022037
    [8] Divakar Dahiya, Caoimhin Mackin, Poonam Singh Nigam . Studies on bioactivities of Manuka and regional varieties of honey for their potential use as natural antibiotic agents for infection control related to wound healing and in pharmaceutical formulations. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(2): 288-310. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024015
    [9] Joice Cavalcanti Lima, Lívia de Souza Ramos, Pedro Fernandes Barbosa, Iuri Casemiro Barcellos, Marta Helena Branquinha, André Luis Souza dos Santos . Biofilm production by the multidrug-resistant fungus Candida haemulonii is affected by aspartic peptidase inhibitor. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 228-241. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025012
    [10] Almaris N. Alonso . Hydrophobic nature and effects of culture conditions on biofilm formation by the cellulolytic actinomycete Thermobifida fusca. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.1
  • The increasing emergence of multidrug-resistant infection causing microorganisms has become a significant burden globally. Despite the efforts of pharmaceuticals in producing relatively new antimicrobial drugs, they have resulted in a high rate of mortality, disability and diseases across the world especially in developing countries. Supporting this claim was the report of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who estimated that over 2 million illnesses and 23,000 deaths per year are attributable to antibiotic resistant pathogens in the United States. They include Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) producing gram-negative bacilli, Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. For MRSA, resistance is as a result of Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains that have acquired Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) which carries mecA gene. The gene encodes the penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) which confers resistance to all β-lactam antibiotics. Vancomycin was previously the widely preferred drug for the treatment of MRSA infections. It is no longer the case with the emergence of S. aureus strains with reduced vancomycin sensitivity limiting the conventional treatment options for MRSA infections to very scanty expensive drugs. Presently, many researchers have reported the antibacterial activity of many plant extracts on MRSA. Hence, these medicinal plants might be promising candidates for treatment of MRSA infections. This work is a brief review on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the anti-MRSA activities of extracts of selected medicinal plants.


    Cheese has been produced and consumed for thousands of years. There are as many as 1500 cheese varieties identified around the world; every variety displays specific sensory characteristic and thus displaying a diversity of cheeses with different quality characteristics, such as appearance, flavor, aroma, and texture [1]. These cheeses are well-adapted to the local conditions of the environment as well as the cheesemakers' knowledge and social position. Either with the aid of acid, or keeping the milk into the stomachs of slaughtered young animals, cheesemaking was first based on the microflora of raw milk and the “inoculation” of the milk with a sample of a previous day product, i.e. back-slopping.

    Up to the 20th century, cheesemaking remained an unregulated process. The introduction of pasteurization and the discovery and characterization of lactic acid bacteria have changed the views on the way cheese is manufactured [2]. In the early 1960s, commercial starter culture were developed for direct vat inoculation. Nowadays, cheesemaking has progressed to be a fully automated process and requires large quantities of milk, and total control of the process, the use of pasteurized milk and commercial starter cultures for a standardized and successful production of any cheese variety. It should be noted that both traditional or artisanal and industrial cheeses are manufactured following the same basic steps for cheese-making, depending on the cheese type. The industrial ones are standardized, with consistent quality, deliver all the cheese's nutrients nutritious and offer convenience at an economical price to the main group of consumers [3]. Instead, the traditional or artisanal cheeses are locally produced, usually craft-made and using the milk of one, or limited number of farms; these cheeses have a strong linkage to the territory of origin (i.e., climate, landscape, rural development and human knowledge and resources) and therefore are testimonial of the history, the culture and the agricultural life of the local cheesemaker's communities [3]. Organoleptic differences between cheeses are obvious from a great part of consumers, with the industrially manufactured cheeses have recognized by part of the consumers, being bland and uninspiring, and artisanal cheeses have gained a great proportion of sales [4]. Thus, a new group of artisanal cheeses have been developed; these are manufactured following the principles of traditional way, on small scales, but which often employ advanced practices and techniques that satisfy the updated international public health regulations; at the same time preserving the traditional cheesemaking process [4]. Traditional cheeses collectively offer a rich diversity of intrinsic physicochemical and organoleptical characteristics [3]. Many of the special characteristic are partly attributable to the enriched and diverse microfloras of many traditional cheeses [5].

    A variety of artisanal cheeses are manufactured from raw milk, and raw milk's microbiota is an important part final cheeses' microbiota [5]. It is generally accepted that cheese made from raw milk matures in a different way and develops a more intense flavour than that made from pasteurized milk. The main characteristics of raw milk cheeses is that the manufacturing and the maturation is driven by a complex microbial community. Thus, microbial communities appear to be a key player in the development of cheese quality properties. In addition, in terms of safety, raw milk microbial communities may act as a bio-preservative shield against microbial pathogenic and spoilage populations [6]. Recently, a number of microbial cheese diversity studies, that combine both phenotypic and genotypic approaches have published, revealing the complexity of such communities [7],[8]. The distinct microbial consortia from the processing environment have developed an “in house” microflora, which is identical to the specific dairy facility, and this is, possibly, explaining the added diversity of cheese characteristics expressed by each cheese variety [9].

    Yeast are eukaryotes, that is, they contain an identifiable nucleus and most of yeasts contain chitin, which is responsible for their rigid structure [10]. Yeasts are not nutritionally demanding microorganisms and, comparing with bacteria, are larger and grow more slowly; thus, yeasts do not compete with bacteria. However, yeasts grow well at acidified environments, where bacteria either do not grow or grow only very poorly. The low pH of freshly made cheese is therefore partially selective for their growth, against bacteria.

    Sexual reproduction of yeasts is named ‘teleomorph’, and is considered as the perfect form, while asexual reproduction, that is ‘anamorph’, is considered as the imperfect form. Taxonomically, the teleomorphic name is used, however, in one case, the anamorphic name Geotrichum candidum is used, and this will be used in the present paper, rather than Galactomyces candidum, which is the teleomorphic [10].

    Most of the identified microorganisms present in raw milk are lactic acid bacteria and the importance of these microbes in cheese ripening is well recognized [11]. However, the yeast population is also important [12][15] and is associated with the secondary microbiota of a number of cheeses, mostly the artisanal ones, where they have an impact on the maturation process.

    The total raw milk yeast counts are generally in the range of 10–103 cfu/mL [16], and yeast genera commonly identified in raw milk include Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Geotrichum, Kluyveromyces, Trichosporon, Pichia and Rhodotorula spp. [12][15]. Candida rugosa, G. candidum, Torulaspora delbrueckii and Yarrowia lipolytica were common yeast species found in raw milk [17][20]. Büchl and Seiler in their excellent review on yeasts in milk and dairy products reported 21 yeast species in milk, with G. candidum, Issatchenkia occidentalis, Issatchenkia orientalis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Pichia anomala, Pichia fermentans and Trichosporon beigelii being the most frequently found [20].

    Commercial ripening yeast cultures have been developed for special cheese types [21]; these include the selected strains of G. candidum in the production of mould surface ripened cheeses [22]; the lactose-fermenting species K. marxianus, Kluyveromyces lactis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Debaryomyces hansenii in mould surface ripened and blue cheeses [7],[16],[23].

    The aim of the current study is to review the occurrence of yeasts in different cheese varieties and thus study the role of yeasts in cheesemaking process. For this reason, the great variety of cheese types is categorized into seven categories, that is: 1) hard (moisture content less than 43%), 2) semi-hard (moisture content of 44–55%), 3) soft (moisture content more than 56%), which includes soft pasta-filata and whey cheeses, 4) white brined cheeses, 5) mould surface ripened, 6) bacterial surface ripened cheeses, and 7) blue cheeses. For certain cheese types that excluded from the categorization, yeasts have not reported to be an important part of their microflora.

    Yeast identification in milk and milk products was traditionally carried out using the characteristics of the colonies, microscopy, and phenotypical characteristics, such as growth requirements, and assimilation and/or fermentation of certain carbohydrates and nitrogen compounds [24],[25]. However, these methods are laborious, complex and may give confusing results [26]. Throughout the last 20 years, yeast identification is based on sequencing of the D1/D2 region of the 26S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) domains (ITS1 and ITS2) divided by the conserved 5.8S rRNA gene [26][30].

    Denaturing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (DHPLC) has been applied for the identification of yeasts in bacterial surface ripened cheeses [31] and for the assessment of microbial diversity in natural whey cultures used for the manufacture of an Italian pasta-filata cheese [32]. Recently, advanced methods such as Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) have applied for dairy yeast identification purposes [24],[33]. MALDI-TOF MS generates protein-based spectral profiles, that is fingerprints acquired by desorption of specific peptide/protein biomarkers released from the cell surface by acidic treatment, while FTIR is based on the detection of functional biochemical groups directly from intact cells, producing metabolic spectral fingerprints unique for yeast species [24],[34]. Quigley et al. reviewed the application of molecular methods such as DHPLC, Temporal Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (TTGE) and Single Stranded Confirmation Polymorphisms (SSCP) for the identification of microbes, including yeasts, in dairy products from raw milk [35]. The SSCP method has been used for the evaluation of yeast diversity in Salers cheese, a raw milk cheese stored in a wooden container [36].

    Strain typing is essential to trace the yeasts in the dairy environment in order to study its microbial ecology. Yeast genotyping and cluster analysis of the DNA fingerprints are often introduced prior DNA sequencing [24]. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) is commonly used to evaluate intraspecies diversity of chromosome arrangements or chromosome-length polymorphism [37] and have frequently applied for D. hansenii and K. marxianus strains from cheeses [38][40]. In addition, Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), employing a single primer M13 for random amplification of complementary genome sequences, was used for yeast classification in cheese [19] and for typing of D. hansenii strains [41]. Multilocus Sequence Typing is a popular yeast typing method and has been applied to the typing of K. marxianus and D. hansenii isolated from different types of traditional French cheeses such as Camembert, Chevrotin des Aravis, Saint-Nectaire and from Spanish Roncal cheese [42]. The same method has recently applied for the typing of G. candidum isolated from starter cultures and cheeses [43].

    Since the culture-dependent methodologies require isolation on selective media, a more comprehensive overview on both viable and dead microorganisms can be obtained by culture-independent techniques and advanced techniques such as pyrosequencing or Illumina sequencing have been used [44][46].

    The molecular approaches based on the use of metagenomics combined with high-throughput sequencing are currently used in order to profile dominant and subdominant microbial populations on a large scale [41]. Wolfe et al. [48] and Quigley et al. [49] used such approaches to reveal the cheese rind microbiota of certain artisanal cheeses and concluded on the correlation between cheese characteristics with the composition of cheese microbial community at different stages [49].

    Hard cheeses are cheeses with moisture content less than 40% and, usually, a long maturation process (up to 30 months); they are characterized by a granular texture and a strong flavor. Natural whey cultures, thermophilic or mesophilic starters are used for the acidification, and the coagulum is cooked at high temperatures [50]. The most important yeasts isolated from hard cheeses are shown in Table 1.

    Fleet and Mian [51] reported that Australian Cheddar cheeses contained yeast counts of 104–106 cfu/g. Similarly, Welthagen and Vijoen [52] reported that the yeasts counts were varied from 102 to >107 cfu/g in South African Cheddar; additionally, 88% of the cheeses had 105 cfu/g, a level deemed necessary to influence flavour development. During ripening, the density increased from 102 to 103 cfu/g over the first 30 days of ripening, later increased to 106 cfu/g, and then, towards the end of maturation decreased again [52].

    Table 1.  Yeast species isolated from hard cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida catenulate Canestrato Pugiese [60]
    Candida etchellsii Cotija [58]
    Candida glaebosa Pecorino di Farindola [53]
    Candida lambica Fiore Sardo [19]
    Candida parapsilosis Pecorino di Farindola [53]
    Candida zeylanoides Fiore Sardo, Pecorino di Farindola [19],[53]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Fiore Sardo, Pecorino Romano, Serro Minas [19],[55],[59]
    Geotrichum candidum Fiore Sardo [19]
    Kluyveromyces lactis Fiore Sardo, Pecorino Crotonese [19],[54]
    Kluyveromyces marxianus Pecorino di Farindola, Pecorino Romano, Serro Minas [53],[55],[59]
    Kodamaea ohmeri Serro Minas [59]
    Pichia kudriavsevii Cotija, Pecorino di Farindola [53],[58]
    Rhodotorula spp. Pecorino Romano [55]
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pecorino Romano [55]
    Trichosporon cutaneum Canestrato Pugiese [60]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Canestrato Pugiese, Pecorino Crotonese [54],[60]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Pecorino di Farindolais an Italian hard raw milk cheese locally made by farmers, and Tofalo et al. [53] evaluated its yeast consortia during cheesemaking and maturation. Yeast counts ranged from 105 cfu/g at sale to 104 cfu/g for the matured cheese. Similar values have been reported for Pecorino Crotonese [48]. Using molecular identification by a combination of PCR-RFLP of the 5.8S ITS rRNA region and sequencing of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rRNA gene, K. marxianus was the predominant species. Yeast species such as Pichia kudriavzevii, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glaebosa and Candida zeylanoides were present only during the early weeks of ripening. D. hansenii, K. marxianus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and species of Rhodotorula, dominated Pecorino Romano, as well as Pecorino di Filiano [55][57].

    The autochthonous microbiota of Cotija, a traditional extra-hard Mexican raw milk cheese were studied during 90 days of maturation under traditional and controlled conditions [58]. Using molecular assessments by PCR-DGGE 26S and 16S rRNA encoding regions, a complex microbial profile was found, and Candida etchellsii, Pichia kudriavsevii and Moniliella suaveolens were found in the cheese matrix [58].

    The yeast populations in Serro Minas cheese, a traditional and popular cheese produced from raw milk in Brazil, were studied over the course of 60 days of maturation [59]. Enzymatic activity exhibited by these yeast isolates was also studied. A total of 19 yeast species were identified, and the predominant yeasts included D. hansenii, Kodamaea ohmeri and K. marxianus. D. hansenii showed low lipolytic and high proteolytic activity. K. marxianus demonstrated lipolytic and β-galactosidase activity and K. ohmeri displayed low lipolytic and β-galactosidase activity.

    Corbo et al. [60] investigated the yeasts from typical Apulian cheeses from Italy, aiming to further select appropriate starter cultures for cheese production. The most prevalent isolates from Canestrato Pugiese belonged to the species Trichosporon cutaneum, Candida catenulate and Yarrowia lipolytica [60].

    The presence and the role of yeast microbiota was investigated in artisanal Fiore Sardo cheese throughout the maturation and strains belonging to the prevalent species D. hansenii, K. lactis, G. candidum, Candida zeylanoides and Candida lambica were selected for technological and genotypic characterization [19]. They reported that D. hansenii strains fermented glucose and assimilated lactate, while some strains showed the ability to assimilate citrate. As far as the emzymic activities, only a few D. hansenii strains showed proteolytic and lipolytic activity. K. lactis was able to both assimilate and ferment lactose, to assimilate lactate but not citrate and to show proteolytic but not lipolytic activity. G. candidum assimilated lactate and some strains showed proteolytic and lipolytic activity. C. zeylanoides assimilated lactate and citrate and showed lipolytic activity and C. lambica fermented glucose and assimilated lactate.

    Interestingly, selected yeasts such as G. Geotrichum, Pichia jadinii, Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii were studied for lactic acid utilization, lipolysis, proteolysis and flavour development in foil ripened Raclette cheeses [61]. Throughout the maturation, the lactic acid content was increased, probably as a result of increased lactic acid bacteria, and yeast metabolites may have a positive contribution. Yeasts showed either esterase or lipase activity. Moreover, yeasts revealed peptidase activity, and an increase in small peptides and free amino acids was observed. Y. lipolytica was capable of improving the overall sensory characteristics of cheese, but G. Geotrichum, Pichia jadinii and D. hansenii had a neagative effect on the organoleptic properties of the final cheese.

    The category of semi-hard cheeses is a heterogeneous cheese category. Semi-hard cheeses have a moisture of 44–55%, and there are semi-hard cheeses which could belong to more than one category, e.g., Gouda cheese, which belong to Dutch-type cheeses. Some of them may be consumed as semi-hard, or at a longer maturation period, as hard cheese [50]. The most important yeasts isolated from semi-hard cheeses are shown in Table 2.

    The yeast microflora was studied for an artisanal semi-hard cheese made from raw ovine milk manufactured in South Portugal by Pereira-Dias [62]. A total of 344 yeasts strains were isolated from the curd and cheese body during the 60 days maturation. Esterase activity was common to most of the isolates, while proteolysis was observed in only a few of them. D. hansenii and Candida intermedia were the most frequent species and these two species increased to 86% at the end of the maturation. Padilla et al. [41] used molecular methods for the identification of yeast from four ovine and caprine raw milk semi-hard cheeses, produced in a small dairy sited within the borders of the Natural Park Sierra de Espadán, Castellón, Spain. Yeast counts of ovine milk cheeses, started at 104 and 105 cfu/g and increased to 107 cfu/g at the third week of the maturation, while for caprine milk cheeses, the yeast counts started at 104 and 105 cfu/g reaching 108 cfu/g, at the end of maturation. D. hansenii and K. lactis isolates were found to be the most abundant yeast species, and other yeast species were isolated in minor numbers. In all cheeses, yeast diversity decreased along the cheese maturation. The yeast isolates were also studied for several technological features and most yeast isolates showed proteolytic activity.

    Canastra cheese is a semi-hard cheese which is produced in seven municipalities in the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. This cheese is produced from bovine raw milk inoculated with the commercial rennet and pingo, which is a type of natural starter obtained from the cheese whey from the previous day [33]. Thirty nine isolates capable of fermenting lactose in a synthetic medium were identified by MALDI-TOF as K. lactis, T. delbrueckii and C. intermedia. Borelli et al. [63] reported Kodomaeda ohmeri, D. hansenii, T. delbrueckii and K. lactis as the most frequent yeasts in Canastra cheese. K. lactis is frequently isolated from dairy products such as cheeses, which might be due to its capacity of fermenting lactose.

    Table 2.  Yeast species isolated from semi-hard cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida intermedia Semi-hard ovine cheese, Canastra [33],[62]
    Candida parapsilosis Semi-hard ovine and caprine cheese [41]
    Candida sake Fontina [67]
    Candida zeylanoides Semi-hard ovine cheese [62]
    Clavispora lusitaniae Tomme d' Orchies [65]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Semi-hard bovine, ovine and caprine milk cheeses, Canastra, Fontina, Tomme d' Orchies ,[41],[62],[65],[66],[67][69]
    Kazachstania unispora Semi-hard bovine and caprine cheese [41]
    Kluyveromyces lactis Semi-hard bovine, ovine and caprine cheese, Canastra, Tomme d' Orchies [33],[41],[65],[66],[69]
    Kluyveromyces marxianus Tomme d' Orchies [65]
    Kodomaea ohmeri Canastra [69]
    Pichia fermentans Semi-hard bovine cheese [66]
    Pichia guilliermondii Semi-hard bovine cheese [66]
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae Semi-hard bovine cheese [66]
    Saturnispora mendoncae Tomme d' Orchies [65]
    Torulaspora delbrueckii Canastra [33],[69]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Semi-hard bovine, ovine and caprine cheese, Tomme d' Orchies [41],[65],[66]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Sepra cheese is a Portugese artisanal cheese produced within the Alentejo province from raw sheep's milk, using rennet produced from the dried flowers of Cynara cardunculus L. and without the addition of a starter culture [64]. Debaryomyces spp. and Kluyveromyces spp. were the predominant genera. In addition, although in one sample, Kluyveromyces spp. was the dominant yeast in spring cheese, while in winter cheese its abundance was lower than Candida spp. Gonçalves Dos Santos et al. [64] demonstrated that the yeast community of Serpa cheese is composed of a wide diversity of species and they play an important role in the development of the sensory characteristics of the final cheese. Ceugniez et al. [65] studied the yeast diversity in Tomme d' Orchies, a French artisanal cheese, from the North of the country. A great diversity in yeast microflora and species were identified as D. hansenii, K. lactis, K. marxianus and Y. lipolytica; infrequent species were identified as Clavispora lusitaniae and Saturnispora mendoncae.

    Atanassova et al. [66] identified by both genotyping and sequencing methods: Y. lipolytica, K. lactis, D. hansenii, Pichia guilliermondii, P. fermentans and S. cerevisiae from short ripened starter-free raw bovine milk cheese, made in Galicia, in Spain. Y. lipolytica and K. lactis displayed the strongest extracellular proteolytic activity on skim milk agar, and none of the D. hansenii isolates showed any activity on this medium. K. lactis mainly produced acetaldehyde, ethanol, branched chain aldehydes and alcohols, and acetic acid esters, which were responsible for alcoholic, fruity and acetic notes. The volatile profiles of D. hansenii were rather limited and characterized by high levels of methyl ketones.

    Table 3.  Yeast species isolated from soft cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida inconspicua Bryndza [72]
    Candida intermedia Manouri (whey cheese) [73]
    Candida mogii Manouri (whey cheese) [73]
    Candida xylopsoci Bryndza [72]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Bryndza, Manouri (whey cheese) [72],[73]
    Galactomyces candidus Bryndza [72]
    Geotricum spp. Robiola di Roccaverano (acid coagulated) [71]
    Kluyveromyces lactis Robiola di Roccaverano (acid coagulated) [71]
    Kluyveromyces marxianus Bryndza, Water Buffalo Mozzarella [72],[74],[75]
    Pichia farinose Manouri (whey cheese) [73]
    Pichia kudriavzevii Bryndza [72]
    Pichia membranefasciens Manouri (whey cheese) [73]
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae Manouri (whey cheese), Water Buffalo Mozzarella, Cacio Cavallo Podolico [73][75]
    Torulaspora delbrueckii Manouri (whey cheese) [73]
    Trichosporon lactis Bryndza [72]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Bryndza [72]
    ZygosSaccharomyces rouxii Manouri (whey cheese) [73]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Dolci et al. [67] studied the evolution of rind microflora in Fontina Protected Denomination of Origin semi-hard cheese. Yeasts were found to increase from 103 to 106 cfu/g in 28 days; a consequent rise of pH in the surface of cheese was observed (see bacteria surface ripened cheeses), together with an increase in the number of salt-tolerant bacteria, mainly coryneforms which reached 109 cfu/g. D. hansenii and Candida sake were the species more constantly present throughout the whole maturing process.

    Formagio di Fossa is a semi-hard cheese, with a special feature; the process of ripening occurs in special underground pits placed in a delimited area in the center of Italy [68]. Eight different yeast species were identified from pit environment: C. zeylanoides, Candida norvegica, Pichia occidentalis, Pichia guilliermondii, Pichia jadinii, Cryptococcus albidus, Cryptococcus skinneri, and Sporobolomyces roseus. Only C. zeylanoides was also found at the end of the maturation, together with the new isolated species Wickerhamomyces anomalus, S. cerevisiae, D. hansenii, and Candida homilentoma [68].

    Dutch-type cheeses are semi-hard cheese varieties in which the few small eye-holes are formed by the CO2 produced from the fermentation of citrate by starter culture. Thus, citrate-positive bacteria are used as mesophilic starter culture. A special step in the cheesemaking is that the curd is washed with warm water, and cheeses are cooked at 37–45 °C, pressed, salted in brines and matured for 3–4 weeks to 1 year. Yeast counts in Gouda cheese showed an increase from 102 cfu/g to 105 cfu/g, but much slower than the lactic acid bacteria. The depletion of lactose is characteristic for Dutch-type cheeses, and the increase of yeasts after the depletion of lactose was occurred, possibly yeasts utilize the organic acids produced by the lactic acid bacteria, which consequently lead to an increase in pH. Candida catenulata, C. laurentii, C. zeylanoides, C. albidus, D. hansenii, K. marxianus, Rhodotorula glutinis, R. minuta, S. cerevisiae, S. roseus, T. delbrueckii, T. beigellii and Y. lipolytica were identified [70].

    Soft cheeses are cheeses with soft texture, while some of them are spreadable; they are either coagulated with rennet or with acid, as the milk is coagulated from the acid at a pH of 4.6. Soft cheeses have a moisture content higher than 55%. The acidification is either caused by the adventitious lactic acid bacteria, or by the addition of an acid. Some soft cheeses are consumed fresh; some are ripened for 5–60 days [50]. The most important yeasts isolated from soft cheeses are shown in Table 3.

    Bonetta et al. [71] studied the microbiological characterization of a typical Italian cheese Robiola di Roccaverano. Cheese samples were collected from four artisanal and one industrial producer. Artisanal producers used raw caprine milk and natural fermentation, whilst the industrial producer used mixed bovine-caprine milk and selected starters. The identification methods showed that microbial species such as Geotricum spp. and K. lactis that are related to the production of this typical cheese.

    Bryndza cheese is a soft spreadable cheese, made from unpasteurized ovine milk. It is a traditional food product produced in mountain regions of Slovakia. May Bryndza cheese is a highly valued variant of Bryndza, which is produced in the beginning of summer season, in May. The diversity of yeasts encompassed Candida xylopsoci, C. inconspicua, D. hansenii, Galactomyces candidus, K. marxianus, Pichia kudriavzevii, Trichosporon lactis and Y. lipolytica [72].

    A distinct category of soft cheeses are the whey cheeses. Whey cheeses are characterized by the fact that the coagulation of the milk (or whey) in caused by heating at 85–90 °C. Whey from the manufacture of hard or other cheeses is mixed with milk and/or cream and heated at 88–90 °C for 40–45 min; heating causes aggregation of the whey proteins and formation of the curd. Salt is added and the curd is moulded, drained and cooled [50]. The heating process causes killing of the yeast present in the curd and yeasts appear after post-heating contamination. There was a great diversity of yeast species, but D. hansenii and Pichia membranefasciens predominated. Other yeast strains found were T. delbrueckii, Pichia farinosa, Candida mogii, Candida intermedia, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, S. cerevisiae [73].

    Mozzarella is a soft pasta-filata cheese. Pasta-filata cheeses are manufactured from curd that are cooked at 60–70 °C, kneaded and stretched to form a smooth, plasticised, fibrous texture [50]. Some past-filata cheeses, such as Mozzarella di Bufala, are consumed fresh, and most of them are matured for 2–4 months, however, the maturation can be as long as up to 2 years for some cheese types (e.g., Caciocavallo Podolico). According to Romano et al. [74], the numbers and species of yeasts in the different cheeses vary, and there are certain yeast species that are more frequently detected than others. For instance, the galactose fermenting S. cerevisiae is often detected in pasta filata cheeses. Recently, a study has focused on lactose and/or galactose fermenting species Kluyveromyces and Saccharomyces, in order to evaluate their role on the functional and sensory properties of Mozzarella. The dominance of fermenting yeasts such as K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae suggests that these yeasts contribute to the development of the sensory characteristics of Mozzarella cheese [75].

    White-brined cheeses constitute a separate family of cheeses, the characteristics of which is that they are ripened and preserved in brine until delivered to the customer. They are soft, semi-soft to semi-hard cheeses, traditionally produced under various names in the Balkans and Middle East and neighbouring countries. Traditionally, white brined cheeses are made mainly from ovine, caprine and buffalo milks, therefore, they retain the white colour of these milks. Mesophilic or thermophilic starter cultures are used and some varieties are cooked (e.g., the Greek Sfela and the Cypriot Halloumi), while most are not. The characteristic step in the cheesemaking process of these cheeses is that the maturation takes place with the cheese submerged in brine [50].

    Table 4.  Yeast species isolated from white brined cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida albicans Domiati [78]
    Candida boidinii Halloumi [76]
    Candida butyric Danish Feta-type [76]
    Candida famata Feta, Brine [76],[77]
    Candida krisii/zeylanoides Feta [77]
    Candida parapsilosis Halloumi [76]
    Candida sake Feta, Danish Feta-type [76],[77]
    Candida sphaerica French Feta-type [76]
    Candida versatilis Halloumi, Brine [76]
    Clavispora lusitaniae Domiati [76]
    Cryptococcus albidus Halloumi (bovine milk) [78]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Feta, Danish Feta-type, Halloumi, Brine [76],[77]
    Issatchenkia orientalis Domiati [78]
    Kluyveromyces blattae French Feta-type [76]
    Kluyveromyces lactis Feta [77]
    Kluyveromyces marxianus Feta, Danish Feta-type, Brine, Domiati [76][78]
    Kluyveromyces thermotolerance French Feta-type [76]
    Kodamaea ohmeri (Pichia ohmeri) Domiati [78]
    Pichia farinose Feta [76]
    Pichia membranaefaciens Feta, Halloumi (ovine and bovine milk), Brine [76],[77]
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae Feta, Brine [76],[77]
    Torulaspora delbrueckii Feta, Danish Feta-type, Brine [76],[77]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Danish Feta-type, Brine [76]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The microbiology of white brined cheese has been reviewed [76]. More recently, Rantsiouet al. [77] examined the components of the microflora of four Feta cheeses, produced by different Greek manufacturers, using culture dependent and independent techniques. The main yeast species found were S. cerevisiae, D. hansenii, C. famata, P. membranifaciens, T. delbrueckii, K. marxianus, Candida sake and K. lactis [77].

    Domiati is a well-known white-brined cheese; while fresh Domiati cheese is less salty and stored for a few weeks under refrigeration, Domiati cheese is highly salted and stored for a few months in brine solution or salted whey [78]. Identification results showed that the isolated yeasts belonged to the species I. orientalis, Candida albicans, Clavispora lusitaniae (Candida lusitaniae), Kodamaea ohmeri (Pichia ohmeri), K. marxianus, and Candida catenulata. These identified yeasts were recovered from samples of all examined products, however, different degrees of yeast diversity were observed in these products. While fresh Domiati cheese contained a single but different yeast species, matured Domiati contained a diverse range of yeast species. Total yeast counts in Domiati cheese were generally higher than 103 cfu/g, but lower than 105 cfu/g [76]. It is worth noting that C. arbicans was isolated from fresh Domiati cheese. C. arbicans, together with Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis and Candida guillermondii, also known as the most common yeast pathogens, are opportunistic commensals responsible for various mycoses [79],[80]. However, none of these species are found in mature cheese, and only found in fresh cheese and brines [81] and are probably unable to survive the maturation process [79].

    Mould surface ripened cheese varieties have a special characteristic, that is the growth of Penicillium camemberti on the surface of the cheese, causing the characteristic softening of the cheese. During the first phase, after the by a mesophilic starter, the pH is below 5.8, only an acidophilic flora, that is yeasts, such as D. hansenii, K. lactis, G. candidum, which, together with the mould P. camemberti raise the pH by consuming the lactate for their growth [82]. At the same time, lactate migrates from the core, and calcium phosphate precipitates and soluble calcium phosphate migrates to the surface. During the second phase, bacteria adapted to the high salt content of the cheese such as staphylococci or coryneforms will start to grow and contribute to the maturation process [50].

    The main yeasts found in mould surface ripened cheeses are D. hansenii, K. lactis, K. marxianus and G. candidum. Other species such as S. cerevisiae, Y. lipolytica and Candida spp. are occasionally present. K. lactis and K. marxianus metabolise residual lactose first; when lactose has exhausted, lactate will be metabolised by D. hansenii and other yeasts. The pH of mould surface ripened cheeses increase slowly during the first 5 days, but the growth of P. camemberti cause a very fast increase in pH at the surface. The pH increases from less than 5 to 7.5 in less than 2 days. Yeast population numbers were found to be greater than 106 cfu/g in the surface of Camembert cheese [83]. The most predominant species isolated were D. hansenii, Candida catenulata, C. lipolytica, C. kefyr, C. intermedia, S. cerevisiae, Cryptococcus albidus and K. marxianus. In another study, Camembert and Brie cheeses were monitored for their yeast populations in order to determine the seasonal diversity of yeasts [84]. It was found that yeasts play a significant role during maturation. D. hansenii and Y. lipolytica were the most abundant yeast species isolated from Camembert and Brie cheeses. In addition, T. delbrueckii, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Rhodotorula minuta and various species of Candida were also isolated.

    Addis et al. monitored the growth of yeasts and bacteria during the maturation of Australian Camembert cheese [85]. Yeasts reached 105–109 cfu/g, throughout the maturation, depending on the manufacturer. D. hansenii predominated, and Y. lipolytica were present. Interactions between the various yeasts and bacterial isolates were examined [85].

    Table 5.  Yeast species isolated from mould surface ripened cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida.spp. Camembert and Brie [83]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Camembert and Brie [83],[84]
    Rhodotorula minuta Camembert and Brie [83]
    Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Camembert and Brie [83]
    Torulaspora delbrueckii Camembert and Brie [83]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Camembert and Brie [83],[84]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Chen et al. [86] examined the influence of selected yeast strains on Camembert-type cheeses. Yeast population grew exponentially and then slowed to a moderate growth rate throughout maturation. The reported results indicated that the selected strains had a significant effect on the content and ratio of individual free amino acids, and thus on the development of flavor, whereas the addition of adjunct culture had no effect on the lipolysis. In the cheese with added I. orientalis, a greater amount of small peptides and a higher concentration of non-protein nitrogen and NH3 were found.

    Bacterial surface ripened, also called smear cheeses, are characterized by the development of special bacterial microflora (smear) on the surface of the cheese. Some varieties are curd washed and cooked, depending on the fat content, and moulded. Some are pressed and salted in brine. Throughout the maturation, the surface of the cheese is washed with a brine solution containing special bacterial microflora. The milk is coagulated with rennet and then a diverse group of yeasts (see Table 6) begin to grow on the cheese surface. The yeasts are metabolizing the residual lactate, producing CO2 and H2O and causing thus, an increase in the pH. In addition, deamination of amino acids and production of NH3 may occur. This deacidification favours the growth of a complex bacterial microflora, and yeasts produce compounds that stimulate the bacterial growth. This microflora includes various coryneforms (e.g., Corynebacterium spp., Arthrobacter spp. and Brevibacterium spp.), micrococci and staphylococci. Some of these organisms are pigmented, which leads to the characteristic red-orange colour of smear cheeses [50],[87]. Although considerable variation occurs, the most prevalent yeasts reported in bacterial surface ripened cheeses include D. hansenii, Candida spp., Trichosporon spp., Y. lipolytica, Kluyveromyces spp., Rhodotorula spp. and Torulaspora spp., together with G. candidum [88].

    Dugat-Bony et al. [89] investigated the specificity and diversity of cheese microbiota associated with 60 cheeses belonging to 12 traditional French cheese varieties, that is Epoisses, Maroilles, Soumaintrain, Saint-Marcellin, Langres, Munster, Livarot, Pont l' Eveque, Mont d' or, Abbaye de Giteaux, Reblochon and Saint-Nectaire, manufactured from bovine milk. Bacterial surface ripened cheeses host complex microbial communities responsible for the transformation of milk into cheese as well as the development of important properties in terms of texture, color and sensory perception, and, little variation was observed regarding the fungal community composition over cheese varieties and sample types (rind or core) [89]. Indeed, most samples were dominated by G. candidum, D. hansenii and C. sake, with minor detection of other fungal species.

    The composition of microbial communities varies according to the cheese variety as seems from the results obtained by Quigley et al. [49] for a variety of Irish cheeses. Wolfe et al. [48] stated that the rind type and parameters such as moisture together with certain cheesemaking manufacturing steps, such as the coagulation type (lactic vs rennet) or the draining method, have a great impact on the cheese microbial communities. Although a positive correlation was observed between bacterial diversity and pH, this was not observed for fungi, that are generally known to be tolerant to the acidification [90].

    Table 6.  Yeast species isolated from bacteria surface ripened cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida sake Smear cheese, Taleggio, Danish surface-ripened cheese [89],[92],[93]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Danish surface-ripened cheese [92]
    Geotrichum candidum Smear cheese [89]
    Geotrichum spp. Danish surface-ripened cheese [92]
    Kluyveromyces lactis Taleggio [92]
    Kluyveromyces marxianus Taleggio [92]
    Pichia guilliermondii Taleggio [92]
    Torulaspora delbruecki Taleggio [92]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Taleggio, Danish surface-ripened cheese [92],[93]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Production of bacteria surface ripened cheeses depends on the surface growth of a diverse group of bacteria and yeasts. These microorganisms often originate from the cheesemaking facility forming interesting and complex associations [91]. While commercial adjunct cultures are frequently used, it is not clear enough whether these strains are able to establish successfully within the resisting microflora. Goerges et al. studied the fate of adjunct cultures in Limburger cheese; the cheese was supplemented with a commercial adjunct culture containing D. hansenii, G. Geotrichum, Arthrobacter arilaitensis, and Brevibacterium aurantiacum [91]. While certain yeast present in the culture (i.e. D. hansenii), the bacterial smear cultures could not be reisolated from the cheese surface at all. Goerges et al. concluded that none of the adjunct bacterial strains were able to compete significantly against the resident microbial consortia [91].

    The yeast microflora of four Danish bacterial surface ripened cheeses produced at three farmhouses and one industrial dairy was investigated [92]. The surface yeast microbiota consisted primarily of one dominating species for each cheese. Y. lipolytica, Geotrichum spp. and D. hansenii were the dominant species for the farmhouse cheeses, while in the industrially manufactured cheese, only D. hansenii was isolated.

    Taleggio is a soft bacterial surface ripened cheese, produced in Northern Italy by pasteurized milk. The maturation of Taleggio is a complex and dynamic process, influenced by natural microflora and the addition of selected lactic acid bacteria starters; it is not inoculated with commercial yeast starter cultures. The microbial groups involved in the maturation are mesophilic bacteria, micrococci, staphylococci, coliforms, thermophilic streptococci, lactobacilli, yeasts, and moulds [93][95]. G. candidum and D. hansenii were the dominant yeasts, and these were implicated in various stages of the maturation process; K. marxianus and K. lactis were isolated in small frequencies [95]. Sequence analysis of isolates brought to the identification of six frequent species: D. hansenii, K. lactis, K. marxianus, Y. lipolytica, Pichia guilliermondii, and T. delbrueckii, and two additional species C. sake and Candida etchellsii [96].

    Blue cheeses are characterized by blue veins caused by the growth of Penicillium roqueforti in the interior of the cheese. The acidification is carried out by mesophilic lactic starter cultures and the milk is coagulated by rennet extracts. The curd is cut at the size of hazelnut to walnut and, for some varieties, are washed with warm water before being transferred in the moulds and after that they are dry-salted. The curd is not pressed, since the growth of the mould needs oxygen, and thus an open texture. The curds are pierced with needles containing mould spores. Blue cheeses have a strong flavour, caused by the extensive lipolysis, and the presence of n-methyl-ketones which are produced from fatty acids [50].

    Yeast microflora on the surface and interior of Rokpol, a Polish blue cheese, was investigated; yeast populations on the surface of the cheeses ranged from 105–109 cfu/g, but were 10–100 times lower for interior samples, showing a great variability. The most frequently isolated species were C. famata and C. spherica, followed by C. intermedia and Geotrichum ssp. Other species such as Saccharomyces kluyveri, C. kefyr and C. lipolytica were found occasionally [97].

    Significant qualitative and quantitative differences were observed in the yeast communities between the cheese sections of Stilton cheese. Y. lipolytica presented strong synergistic activity with P. roqueforti enhancing the production of ketone aroma compounds, characteristic of blue cheeses. Y. lipolytica was present in the white parts, where the P. roqueforti was also present but existed in the mycelial form. K. lactis dominated in the blue veins, was less present in the white core, and had limited presence in the outer crust and thus followed a similar distribution pattern with the P. roqueforti. It is interesting to note that Y. lipolytica and P. roqueforti isolates when grown together delivered enhanced ketone production typical of Stilton aroma. Y. lipolytica strains synergistic with the starter Penicillium which do not inhibit its sporulation would have excellent potential as starter cultures [97].

    The most frequently occurring yeasts on the exterior of Gorgonzola-type blue cheese were species of D. hansenii, C. versatilis, T. beigelii and T. delbrueckii [98]. In the interior, an enhanced diversity in the yeast population was obtained. D. hansenii clearly predominated on the exterior and in the interior of the cheese represented by more than 30% of the population. C. versatilis was the second most abundant yeast species on the exterior and in the interior of the cheese, whereas, T. delbrueckii strains were also frequently encountered. S. cerevisiae, Rhodotorula glutinis, C. zeylanoides and Cryptococcus albidus were only found in the interior of the Gorgonzola-style blue cheese. Species recovered from Gorgonzola- and not from Danish-style, were T. beigelii, R. glutinis and C. zeylanoides [98]. In Kopanisti cheese, where P. roqueforti is a main part of the microflora, T. ovoides was found to be the dominant yeast species [99].

    D. hansenii is one of the most frequently reported yeasts in blue cheeses [85],[95],[100]. For this reason, and because of its strong proteolytic activity it has been suggested that it should be used as part of commercial adjunct cultures. The species was previously reported to stimulate the growth and sporulation of P. roqueforti isolates from blue cheese [101]. However, the phenomenon was strain specific and D. hansenii was found to be the dominant yeast species of both good and poor blue veined cheeses [101].

    Table 7.  Yeast species isolated from blue-veined cheeses.
    Yeasts species Cheese Reference
    Candida catenulate Stilton [97]
    Candida famata Rokpol [96]
    Candida intermedia Rokpol [96]
    Candida kefyr Rokpol [96]
    Candida lipolytica Rokpol [96]
    Candida spherica Rokpol [96]
    Candida versatilis Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Candida zeylanoides Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Cryptococcus albidus Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Debaryomyces hansenii Stilton, Roquefort, Mycella, Gorgonzola-type [97],[98],[100],[102]
    Geotrichum ssp. Rokpol [96]
    Rhodotorula glutinis Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mycella [102]
    Saccharomyces kluyveri Rokpol [96]
    Torulaspora delbrueckii Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Trichosporon beigelii Gorgonzola-type [98]
    Trichosporon ovoides Stilton, Kopanisti [97],[99]
    Yarrowia lipolytica Stilton [97]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The potential use of S. cerevisiae FB7 as an additional starter culture for the production of Mycella, a Danish Gorgonzola-type cheese, was investigated [102]. Two dairy productions of Mycella, each containing batches of experimental cheeses with S. cerevisiae added and reference cheeses without yeast added were carried out. While D. hansenii dominated in the reference cheese and on the surface of the experimental cheeses. In the cheeses with S. cerevisiae FB7, an earlier sporulation and an improved growth of P. roqueforti was observed compared to the reference cheeses. Furthermore, in the experimental cheese, synergistic interactions were also found in the aroma analysis, the degradation of casein and by the sensory analysis. The observed differences indicate a positive contribution to the overall quality of Mycella by S. cerevisiae FB7 [102].

    Brines used for salting the cheese have been reported to be an important source of yeasts. Together with the chemical composition, mainly salt content, the brine microflora has a great impact on the microbiology of the cheese used for and, consequently, on the quality characteristics of the cheese employed [103]. However, limited knowledge is available on the occurrence of microorganisms in cheese brine.

    C. intermedia, D. hansenii, K. lactis, Papiliotrema flavescens, which have not been isolated and identified from dairy industry-related products, R. glutinis, Sterigmatomyces halophilus and Yamadazyma triangularis, formerly named Pichia triangularis, were isolated and identified from Danish brines used for surface-ripened semi-hard Danbo cheeses production [30]. In addition, Zhang et al. studied the effects of salt and temperature on growth and survival of yeasts from brines and concluded that the yeast strains tested could grow in conditions similar to the cheese surface [104]. The cheese brine mimicking condition, at low temperature was found to have a more beneficial for growth of the yeast strains at high NaCl concentrations, whereas a higher temperature is more favorable at low NaCl concentrations [104].

    Salting by brining has an important effect on the structure and flavour of the cheeses and is significant in regulation of the microbiota on the cheese for a number of cheese varieties, such as surface ripened cheeses [105][108] and white-brined cheeses [109],[110].

    However, despite the fact that brining is an important step in the production of a huge variety of cheeses, few detailed studies are available and limited focus has been placed on identification of eukaryotes in cheese brines. Knowledge on the brine microbiota could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the establishment of the microbiota at the cheese surfaces. New procedures should be developed for brine handling including use of specifically adapted microbial cultures to control the brine microbiota and thereby the microbiota on the cheese surfaces in the early ripening period. Brine purification methods, such as chemical treatments with antimicrobials and preservatives, heat treatment, treatment with UVA and UVC light, filtration and microfiltration methods that are used in the dairy industry have been reviewed [103].

    Yeasts, when present in high counts on the surface of certain cheese can cause early gas formation, that is gas creating numerous small holes and produced in cheeses shortly after manufacture [111]. Gas caused by yeasts is CO2 produced from metabolism of lactate or lactose. In white brined cheese, early gas may cause blowing of the cheese block or swelling of the cheese containers, and yeasts that may be involved in early gas blowing include K. lactis, Dekkera anomala and T. delbrueckii, depending on the local factory; microflora and species vary from country to country [112][114]. Excessive yeast growth will cause softening of cheese, a condition that is usually associated with an unpleasant yeasty or ester-like odour [81]. Other defects are pink discolouration [115] and brown spots [116]. The formation of brown pigments, shown on the cheese surface, is caused by excessive growth of Y. lipolytica [24]. Discoloration of the surface of a Portuguese ovine cheese has been attributed to pigment producing Y. lipolytica, which enables brown pigments to be produced from tyrosine [117]. It is interesting to note that these brown pigments, which are formed from the catabolism of tyrosine have been reported to exhibit antimicrobial activity [118].

    In addition, yeasts can cause deacidification at the surface of the cheese when they catabolize amino acids to produce NH3 [119]. The increase in the pH of the cheese, may be either from the utilization of lactates or from the production of NH3. In any case, the pH increase can spur the growth of Staphylococcus aureus [120] and possibly other pathogenic and/or spoilage bacteria with low acidic tolerance [48].

    The production of biogenic amines, that is, toxic metabolites that produced from the decarboxylation of free amino acids. This reaction is caused by microbial enzymic activity and the most frequently produced biogenic amines are: histamine, tyramine, cadaverine, putrescine, tryptamine and phenylethylamine [24]. Although biogenic amines are produced from the metabolic action of certain lactic acid bacteria, yeast species such as Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii may have the potential to produce biogenic amines, but this trait is strain specific [21].

    Yeasts constitute an important part of cheese microflora for many types of cheese. Over the past 15 years, knowledge of yeast diversity in cheeses has increased considerably, due to the use of molecular methods for identification and strain typing. Selected yeast species have been used as adjunct cultures for certain cheese types as have shown to contribute to the development of the special sensory characteristics during the manufacture and maturation [119].

    The yeasts, usually coming as contaminants, are easily developed on the surface of the cheese and then, depending on the cheese type and their characteristics, contribute to the maturation process with their proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes. This contribution, which has not fully studied for each cheese type, depends on their population numbers and the specific yeast species and strains present. It appears that the prevailing yeast species in the most of cheese types is D. hansenii (Tables 17). D. hansenii has been identified in all seven categories; this prevalence may be due to its high halotolerance, since it can survive up to 20–24% (w/w) NaCl, together with their ability to grow at low pH and utilize lactate as the main carbon source [21]. This species can be found on the surface of a great number of cheeses and in the brines used for their salting, and brining step is the most probable contamination point. In addition to the hard cheeses shown in Table 1, where yeasts were isolated at some point during the manufacture, Banjara et al. isolated D. hansenii species from retail samples of Asiago, Gruyere, Parmesan-type, Romano and other hard cheeses [121].

    K. marxianus and K. lactis were also abundant in most of the cheese types (Tables 14 and 6); this is due to their ability to utilize lactose as a source of carbon. These species are able to ferment lactose and produce ethanol and CO2, whereas, they can metabolize lactate, but after lactose is depleted [21]. K. marxianus and K. lactis have shown exceptional biochemical activities with proteolytic and lipolytic action, and also esterase activity producing esters and acetaldehyde, contributing thus, to the maturation and the development of flavour compounds. G. candidum is usually present in mould and bacteria surface ripened cheeses, but it has been isolated from retail samples of many hard cheeses [121]. Y. lipolytica is also a popular yeast in many cheese types (Tables 1, 2 and 47), and is characterized by its very strong proteolytic and lipolytic activities, producing great amounts of volatile compounds, contributing, thus, to the development of aroma and flavour of cheese [108]. However, the strong enzymic activity of Y. lipolytica may lead to off-flavours.

    Besides these species, a great diversity of yeast species has been observed. For some cheese types yeasts are the main microbial group, at least for some part of their maturation process, while for some other types yeasts are absent. Differences between industrially manufactures cheeses and artisanal cheeses have specified. Artisanal cheeses possess a diverse assortment of yeast species, mainly belonging to the genera Candida, Clavisporalus, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Geotrichum (=Galactomyces), Issatchenkia, Kazachstania, Kluyveromyces, Kodemaea, Pichia, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, Saturnispora, Torulaspora, Trichosporon, Yarrowia and Zygosaccharomyces. However, the prevalence of the yeast species are dependent on the specific characteristics of each cheese variety and the manufacturing steps followed during the manufacture. In addition, yeast species composition changes greatly along the cheese maturation process. The microflora in certain cheese types (e.g., white brined cheeses, surface-ripened and blue-veined cheeses) is complex and contains a broad, diverse range of yeasts with a special role in the maturation process. The great variability in cheesemaking process together with the variable maturation conditions makes the cheese ecology a diverse environment for the development of a great number of different microbial.

    The knowledge of the whole cheese microbiome is a requirement in order to have a picture of the way the flavour and other sensory characteristic of each cheese variety is developed and to have a control of the overall quality of cheese. However, this knowledge needs to be integrated with the biochemical activities of the yeast strains and the numbers of the population present in the cheese throughout the maturation. In addition, the source of contamination, that is the source of these yeasts needs to be determined, in order to understand the impact of yeasts in the maturation process of each cheese type. Monitoring and controlling the level of contamination and identifying the yeast strains involved, as part of the whole cheese microbiota (i.e., together with the starter and non-starter lactic acid bacteria and other moulds) will give a picture of how the specific cheese sensory characteristics are developed for each type of cheese.

    Species identification and characterization, together with the interactions with other microbial groups at specific stages of cheesemaking, are therefore essential to understand the role of yeasts in cheese.


    Acknowledgments



    We appreciate members of our departments in Igbinedion University Okada for their encouragements.

    Conflict of interest



    All the authors have declared no conflict of interest in this short review.

    [1] Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x
    [2] Basak S, Singh P, Rajurkar M (2016) Multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant bacteria: A study. J Pathog 2016: 4065603.
    [3] Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). (2017) Multidrug-resistant organisms. Infection change package. Available from: http://www.hret-hiin.org.
    [4] Nii-Trebi NI (2017) Emerging and neglected infectious diseases: Insights, advances and challenges. Bio Med Res 2017: 5245021.
    [5] Adwan GM, Abu-Shanad BA, Adwan KM (2009) In vitro activity of certain drugs in combination with plant extracts against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Afric J Biotechnol 8: 4239–4241.
    [6] World Health Organization (WHO). WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed, 2017. Available from: http://who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics.
    [7] Gardete S, Alexander Tomasz A (2014) Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest 124: 2836–2840. doi: 10.1172/JCI68834
    [8] Kali A (2015) Antibiotics and bioactive natural products in treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): A brief review. Pharmacogn Rev 9: 29–34. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.156329
    [9] Kaur DC, Chate SS (2015) Study of antibiotic resistance pattern in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with special reference to newer antibiotic. J Global Infect Dis 7: 78–84. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.157245
    [10] Arunkumar V, Prabagaravarthanan R, Bhaskar M (2017) Prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections among patients admitted in critical care units in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Med Sci 5: 2362–2366. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172085
    [11] McGuinness WA, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR (2017) Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Yale J Biol Med 90: 269–281.
    [12] Subramani R, Narayanasumy M, Feussner KD (2017) Plant-derived antimicrobials to fight against multidrug-resistant human pathogens. 3 Biotech 7: 172.
    [13] Conly JM, Johnston BL (2002) Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, hetero-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: The end of the vancomycin era? Pulsus: The Canadian J Infect Dis 13: 282–284.
    [14] Taiwo SS (2011) Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century: A public health challenge. World J Clin Infect Dis 30: 11–16.
    [15] Onemu OS, Ophori EA (2013) Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens obtained from patients attending the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. J Nat Sci Res 3: 154–159.
    [16] Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR (2015) Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Am J Pathol 185: 1518–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.030
    [17] Kong C, Neoh H, Nathan S (2016) Targeting Staphylococcus aureus toxins: A potential form of anti-virulence therapy. Toxins (Basel) 8: 72. doi: 10.3390/toxins8030072
    [18] Weinstein RA, Fridkin SK (2001) Vancomycin-intermediate and –resistant Staphylococcus aureus: What the infectious disease specialist needs to know. Clin Infect Dis 32:108–115. doi: 10.1086/317542
    [19] Appelbaum PC (2006) The emergence of vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 12: 16–23.
    [20] Loomba PS, Taneja J, Mishra B (2010) Methicillin- and Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized patients. J Global Infect Dis 2: 275–283. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68535
    [21] Pinho MG, Filipe SR, De Lencastre H, et al. (2001) Complementation of the essential peptidoglycan transpeptidase function of penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) by the drug resistance protein PBP2A in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 183: 6525–6531. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6525-6531.2001
    [22] Lee JH (2003) Methicillin (Oxacillin)- resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 6489–6494. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6489-6494.2003
    [23] Harkins CP, Pichon B, Doumith M, et al. (2017) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged long before the introduction of methicillin into clinical practice. Genome Biol 18: 130. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1252-9
    [24] Johnson AP (2011) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): The European landscape. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 43–48.
    [25] Okwu M, Bamgbala S, Aborisade W (2012) Prevalence of nasal carriage of Community-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among healthy primary school children in Okada, Nigeria. J Nat Sci Res 2: 61–65.
    [26] Adhikari R, Pant ND, Neupane S, et al. (2017) Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of vancomycin for S. aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples of the patients attending a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2017: 2191532.
    [27] Rodríguez-Noriega E, Seas C, Guzmán-Blanco M, et al. (2010) Evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Latin America. Int J Infect Dis 14: 7.
    [28] Otto M (2017) Next-generation sequencing to monitor the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Genome Med 9: 68. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0461-x
    [29] Sit PS, Teh CS, Idris N, et al. (2017) Prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and the molecular characteristics of MRSA bacteremia over a two-year period in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia. BMC Infect Dis 17: 274. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2384-y
    [30] Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, deLencastre H (2007) Update to the multiplex polymerase chain reaction strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 3374–3377. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00275-07
    [31] Okwu MU, Mitsan O, Oladeinde B, et al. (2016) Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing of methicillin-resistant staphylococci obtained from clinical samples in south-south, Nigeria. World J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 5: 91–103.
    [32] Amirkhiz MF, Rezaee MA, Hasani A, et al. (2015) Staphylococcal cassette chromosome typing of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): An eight year experience. Arch Pediar Infect Dis 3: e30632.
    [33] Rodvold KA, McConeghy KW (2014) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapy: Past, present and future. Clin Infect Dis 58: S20–S27. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit614
    [34] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2006) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, CLSI approved standard M100-S16, Wayne, PA.
    [35] Tenover FC, Robert C, Moellering RC (2007) The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 44:1208–1215. doi: 10.1086/513203
    [36] Howden BP, Davies JK, Paul DR, et al. (2010) Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: Resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 99–139. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00042-09
    [37] Dhanalashmi TA, Umapathy BL, Mohan DR (2010) Prevalence of methicillin, vancomycin and multidrug resistance among Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Diagn Res 6: 974–977.
    [38] Fridkin SK (2001) Vancomycin-intermediate and resistant Staphylococcus aureus. What infectious disease specialists need to know. Clin Infect Dis 32: 108–115.
    [39] Appelbaum PC (2007) Reduced glycopeptides susceptibility in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Int J Antimicrob Agents 30: 398–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.011
    [40] Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, et al. (1997) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 40: 135–136. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.1.135
    [41] Gardete S, Tomasz A (2014) Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest 124: 2836–2840. doi: 10.1172/JCI68834
    [42] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2007) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th Informational supplement M100-S15, NCCLS Wayne, PA.
    [43] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2007) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; 5th ed. Approved standards, M7-A5, NCCLS Wayne, PA.
    [44] Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2002) Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin- United States. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep (MMWR) 51: 565–567.
    [45] Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, et al. (2003) Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the van A resistance gene. N Engl J Med 348: 1342–1347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025025
    [46] Okwu MU, Okorie TG, Mitsan O, et al. (2014) Prevalence and comparison of three methods for detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in tertiary health institutions in Nigeria. Can Open Biol Sci 1: 1–12.
    [47] Ravensbergen SJ, Berends M, Stienstra Y, et al. (2017) High prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and ESBL among asylum seekers in the Netherlands. PLoS One 12: e0176481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176481
    [48] Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, et al. (2012) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39: 273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030
    [49] Vaez H, Tabaraei A, Moradi A, et al. (2011) Evaluation of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients in Golestan province north of Iran. Afri J Microbiol Res 5: 432–436.
    [50] Akanbi BO, Mbe JU (2013) Occurrence of methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria. Afri J Clin Exper Microbiol 14: 10–13.
    [51] Goud R, Gupta S, Neogi U, et al. (2011) Community prevalence of methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in and around Bangalore, southern India. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 44: 309–312. doi: 10.1590/S0037-86822011005000035
    [52] Alo M, Ugah U, Okoro N (2013) Epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among clinical isolates in a tertiary hospital in Abakaliki, Nigeria. Amer J Epidermiol Infect Dis 1: 24–26.
    [53] Abdallah EM (2016) Medicinal plants as an alternative drug against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Int J Microbiol Allied Sci 3: 35–42.
    [54] Mahady GB (2005) Medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections. Curr Pharmaceu Design 11: 2405–2427. doi: 10.2174/1381612054367481
    [55] Voravuthikunchai SP, Kitpipit L (2005) Activity of medicinal plant extracts against hospital isolates of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Clin Microb Infect 11: 493–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01155.x
    [56] Invasive Species Compendium- CABI (2018) Available from: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/2184.
    [57] Invasive Species Compendium- CABI (2018) Available from: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/24882.
    [58] Invasive Species Compendium- CABI (2018) Available from: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/28765.
    [59] Invasive Species Compendium- CABI (2018) Available from: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/39510.
    [60] Invasive Species Compendium- CABI (2018) Available from: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/45141.
    [61] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2018) National resources conservation service. Available from: https://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=PUGR2.
    [62] Globinmed (2018) Available from: https://www.globinmed.com/index.php?option.
    [63] Arefin K, Rahman M, Uddin MZ, et al. (2011) Angiosperm flora of Satchari Natural Park, Habiganj, Bangladesh. Bangl J Plan Taxon 18: 117–140.
    [64] Al-Alusin NT, Kadir FA, Ismali S, et al. (2010) In vitro interaction of combined plants: Tinospora crispa and Swietenia mahagoni against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Afri J Microbiol Res 4: 2309–2312.
    [65] Sahu MC, Padhy RN (2013) In vitro antibacterial potency of Butea monosperma Lam. against twelve clinically isolated multidrug resistant bacteria. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 3: 217–226.
    [66] Gomber C, Saxena S (2006) Anti-staphylococcal potential of Callistemon rigidus. Centr Euro J Med 2: 79–88 .
    [67] Aliyu AB, Musa AM, Abdullahi MS, et al. (2008) Activity of plant extracts used in Northern Nigerian traditional medicine against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Nig J Pharmaceu Sci 7: 1–8.
    [68] Akinjogunla OJ, Yah CS, Eghafona NO (2010) Antibacterial activity of the leave extracts of Nymphaea lotus (Nymphaeaceae) on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolated from clinical samples. Annals Biol Res 1: 174–184.
    [69] Wikaningtyas P, Sukandar EY (2016) The antibacterial activity of selected plants towards resistant bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6: 16–19. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.08.003
    [70] Zuo GY, Zhang XJ, Yang CX, et al. (2012) Evaluation of traditional Chinese medicinal plants for anti-MRSA activity with reference to the treatment record of infectious diseases. Molecules 17: 2955–2967. doi: 10.3390/molecules17032955
    [71] Heyman HM, Hussein AA, Meyer JJ, et al. (2009) Antibacterial activity of South African medicinal plants against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Pharmaceu Biol 47: 67–71. doi: 10.1080/13880200802434096
    [72] Uddin Q, Samiulla L, Singh VK, et al. (2012) Phytochemical and pharmacological profile of Withania somnifera Dunal: A review. J Appl Pharmaceu Sci 2: 170–175.
    [73] Nefzi A, Abdallah RA, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, et al. (2016) Antifungal activity of aqueous and organic extracts from Withania somnifera L. against Fusarium oxysporium f. sp. radicis-lycopersia. J Microb Biochem Tech 8: 144–150.
    [74] Sucilathangam G, Gomatheswari SN, Velvizhi G, et al. (2012) Detection of antibacterial activity of medicinal plant Quercus infectoria against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in clinical samples. J Pharmaceu Biomed Sci 14: 8.
    [75] Imelouane B, Amhamdi H, Wathelet JP, et al. (2009) Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) from Eastern Morocco. Int J Agric Biol 11: 205–208.
    [76] Armas JR, Quiroz JR, Roman RA, et al. (2016) Antibacterial activities of essential oils from three medicinal plants in combination with EDTA against MRSA. British Microbiol Res J 17: 1–10.
    [77] Anyanwu MU, Okoye RC (2017) Antimicrobial activity of Nigerian medicinal plants. J Intercul Ethnopharmacol 6: 240–259.
    [78] Abouzeed YM, Elfahem A, Zgheel F (2013) Antibacterial in-vitro activities of selected medicinal plants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Libyan environment. J Environ Anal Toxicol 3: 194.
    [79] Van Vuuren SF (2008) Antimicrobial activity of South African medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 119: 462–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.05.038
    [80] Lapornik B, Prosek M, Wondra AG (2005) Comparison extracts prepared from plant by-products using different solvents and extraction time. J Food Eng 71: 214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.036
    [81] Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaur M, et al. (2011) Phytochemical screening and extraction: A review. Int Pharmaceu Sci 1: 98–106.
    [82] Singh KN, Lal B (2011) Notes on traditional uses of Khair (Acacia catechu Willd.) by inhabitants of Shivalik Range in Western Himalaya. Ethnobot Leafl 10: 109–112.
    [83] Lakshmi T, Aravind Kumar S (2011) Preliminary phytochemical analysis and in vitro antibacterial activity of Acacia catchu Willd bark against Streptococcus mitis, S. sanguis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int J Phytomed 3: 579–584.
    [84] Obolskiy D, Pischel I, Siriwatanametanon N, et al. (2009) A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother Res 23: 1047–1065. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2730
    [85] Karim AA, Azlan A (2012) Fruit pod extracts as a source of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. Molecules 17: 11931–11946. doi: 10.3390/molecules171011931
    [86] Shah KN, Verma P, Suhagia B (2017) A phyto-pharmacological overview on jewel weed. J Appl Pharmaceu Sci 7: 246–252.
    [87] Jash SK, Singh RK, Majhi S, et al. (2013) Peltophorum pterocarpium: Chemical and pharmacological aspects. Int J Pharmaceu Sci Res 5: 26–36.
    [88] Joseph L, George M, Singh G, et al. (2016) Phytochemical investigation on various parts of Psidium guajava. Annals Plant Sci 52: 1265–1268.
    [89] Satheesh KB, Suchetha KN, Vadisha SB, et al. (2012) Preliminary phytochemical screening of various extracts of Punica granatum peel, whole fruit and seeds. Nitte Univer J Healt Sci 2: 34–38.
    [90] Taniguchi S, Kuroda K, Doi K, et al. (2007) Revised structures of gambiriins A1, A2, B1, and B2 chalcaneflavan dimmers from gambir (Uncaria gambir extract). Chem Pharm Bull 55: 268–272. doi: 10.1248/cpb.55.268
    [91] Amir M, Mujeeb M, Khan A, et al. (2012) Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antioxidant activity of Uncaria gambir. Int Green Pharma 6: 67–72. doi: 10.4103/0973-8258.97136
    [92] Li H, Tang GH, Yu Z, et al. (2013) A new carotene sesquiterpene from Walsura robusta. Chin J Nat Med 11: 84–86.
    [93] Quattrochi U (2014) Common names, scientific names, eponyms, synonyms and etymology. In: Taylor and Francis Group, CRC World dictionary of medicinal and poisonous plants, New York: CRC Press, 3938.
    [94] Bhurat MR, Bavaskar SR, Agrawal AD, et al. (2011) Swietenia mahogany Linn- A phytopharmacological review. Asian J Pharmaceu 1: 1–4.
    [95] Danga YS, Esimone CO, Nukenine EN (2014) Larvicidal and phytochemical properties of Callistemon rigidus R. Br. (Myrtaceae) leaf solvent extract against three vector mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis 51: 216–223.
    [96] Almahy HA, Nasir OD (2011) Phytochemical and mineral content of the leaves of four Sudanese Acacia species. J Stored Prod Posthar Res 2: 221–226.
    [97] Oyetayo VO (2007) Comparative studies of the phytochemical and antimicrobial properties of the leaf, stem and tuber of Anchomanes difformis. J Pharmcol Toxicol 2: 407–410. doi: 10.3923/jpt.2007.407.410
    [98] Osuntokun OT (2015) Bioactivity and phytochemical screening of Nigerian medicinal plants growing in Ondo and Ekiti states against bacterial isolates from paediatrics hospital. J Advan Med Pharmaceu Sci 4: 1–14.
    [99] Thakur GS, Bag M, Samodiya BS, et al. (2009) Momordica balsamina: A medicinal and neutraceutical plant for health care management. Curr Pharmaceu Biotech 10: 667–682. doi: 10.2174/138920109789542066
    [100] Afolayan AJ, Sharaibi OJ, Kazeem MI (2013) Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antioxidant activity of Nymphaea lotus L. Int J Pharmacol 9: 297–304. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2013.297.304
    [101] Bello IA, Ndukwe GI, Audu OT, et al. (2011) A bioactive flavonoid from Pavetta crassipes K. Schum. Org Med Chem Lett 1: 14. doi: 10.1186/2191-2858-1-14
    [102] Bariweni MW, Ozolua RI (2017) Neuropharmacological effects of the aqueous leaf extract and fractions of Pavetta crassipes (K. Schum.) Rubiaceae in mice. J Pharm Pharmacog Res 5: 278–287.
    [103] Patel JR, Tripathi P, Sharma V, et al. (2011) Phyllenthus amarus: Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology: A review. J Ethnopharmacol 138: 286–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.09.040
    [104] Aliyu AB, Musa AM, Abdullahi MS, et al. (2011) Phytochemical screening and antibacterial activities of Vernonia ambigua, V. Blumeoides and V. oocephala (Asteraceae). Acta Pol Pharm 68: 67–73.
    [105] Halim MR, Tan MS, Ismail S, et al. (2012) Standardization and phytochemical studies of Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb. Int J Pharm Pharmaceu Sci 4: 606–610.
    [106] Salleh NA, Ismail S, Abhalim MR (2016) Effects of Curcuma xanthorrhiza extracts and their constituents on phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes activity. Pharmacog Res 8: 309–315. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.188873
    [107] Chahyadi A, Hartati R, Wirasutisna K, et al. (2014) Boesenbergia pandurata Roxb., an Indonesian medicinal plant: Phytochemistry, biological activity, plant biotechnology. Proc Chem 13: 13–37.
    [108] Yadnya-Putra AA, Chahyadi A, Elfahmi (2014) Production of panduratin A, cardamomin and sitosterol using cell cultures of Fingerrot (Boesenbergia pandurata (Roxb.) Schlechter). Biosci Biotech Res Asia 11: 43–52.
    [109] Adelowo F, Oladeji O (2017) An overview of the phytochemical analysis of bioactive compounds in Senna alata. Amer J Biochem Eng 2: 7–14.
    [110] Mabona U, Van Vuuren SF (2013) Southern African medicinal plants used to treat skin diseases. South Afri J Bot 87: 175–193. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.04.002
    [111] Kelmanson JE, Jäger AK, van Staden J (2000) Zulu medicinal plants with antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol 69: 241–246. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00147-6
    [112] Yakov F (2006) In vitro 5-lipoxygenase and antioxidant activities of South African medicinal plants commonly used topically for skin diseases, (thesis). Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences.
    [113] Omosa LK, Amugune B, Ndunda B, et al. (2014) Antimicrobial flavonoids and diterpenoids from Dodonaea angustifolia. South Afri J Bot 91: 58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.11.012
    [114] Vaidya V, Mahendrakumar CB, Bhise K (2013) Preliminary phytochemical screening of Quercus infectoria Oliv. for treatment of skin diseases. J Med Plants Res 7: 2019–2027 .
    [115] Shrestha S, Kaushik VS, Eshwarappa RS, et al. (2014) Pharmacognostic studies of insect gall of Quercus infectoria Olivier (Fagaceae). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 4: 35–39.
    [116] Magbool FA, Elnima EI, Shayoub ME, et al. (2018) Preliminary phytochemical screening of Quercus infectoria galls. World J Pharm Pharmaceu Sci 7: 77–87.
    [117] Nema SS, Tohamy MA, El-Banna HA, et al. (2015) Phytochemical and pharmacological studies of ethanolic extract of Thymus vulgaris. World J Pharm Pharmaceu Sci 4: 1988–2001.
    [118] Chew YL, Chan EW, Tan PL, et al. (2011) Assessment of phytochemical content, polyphenolic composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of leguminosae medicinal plants in Peninsular Malaysia. BMC Compl Altern Med 11: 12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-12
    [119] Cowan MM (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12: 564–582. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.564
    [120] Eze C, Iroha IR, Eluu SC, et al. (2017) Comparative studies on the antibacterial activities of leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica and Psidium guajava and antibiotics on methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmaceu Biol Eval 4: 155–161. doi: 10.26510/2394-0859.pbe.2017.24
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Nassima Illikoud, Marine Mantel, Malvyne Rolli-Derkinderen, Valérie Gagnaire, Gwénaël Jan, Dairy starters and fermented dairy products modulate gut mucosal immunity, 2022, 251-252, 01652478, 91, 10.1016/j.imlet.2022.11.002
    2. Marie-José Ayoub, Pamela Bechara, Mariana Habchi, Rachelle Hosry, Mohamad Akl, Sandy Haj Hassan, Pierre Abi Nakhoul, Raw goat's milk fermented Anbaris from Lebanon: insights into the microbial dynamics and chemical changes occurring during artisanal production, with a focus on yeasts, 2022, 89, 0022-0299, 440, 10.1017/S002202992200067X
    3. Mohammadhassan Gholami-Shabani, Masoomeh Shams-Ghahfarokhi, Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, 2023, 10.5772/intechopen.109729
    4. Natasha K. Leeuwendaal, Catherine Stanton, Paul W. O’Toole, Tom P. Beresford, Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome, 2022, 14, 2072-6643, 1527, 10.3390/nu14071527
    5. Giorgia Rampanti, Luca Belleggia, Federica Cardinali, Vesna Milanović, Andrea Osimani, Cristiana Garofalo, Ilario Ferrocino, Lucia Aquilanti, Microbial Dynamics of a Specialty Italian Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese Curdled with Extracts from Spontaneous and Cultivated Onopordum tauricum Willd, 2023, 11, 2076-2607, 219, 10.3390/microorganisms11010219
    6. Aileen Pua, Vivien Chia Yen Tang, Rui Min Vivian Goh, Jingcan Sun, Benjamin Lassabliere, Shao Quan Liu, Ingredients, Processing, and Fermentation: Addressing the Organoleptic Boundaries of Plant-Based Dairy Analogues, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 875, 10.3390/foods11060875
    7. Giorgia Rampanti, Ilario Ferrocino, Joanna Harasym, Roberta Foligni, Federica Cardinali, Agnieszka Orkusz, Vesna Milanović, Irene Franciosa, Cristiana Garofalo, Cinzia Mannozzi, Massimo Mozzon, Andrea Osimani, Lucia Aquilanti, Queijo Serra da Estrela PDO Cheese: Investigation into Its Morpho-Textural Traits, Microbiota, and Volatilome, 2022, 12, 2304-8158, 169, 10.3390/foods12010169
    8. Matthias Sipiczki, Valéria Hrabovszki, Galactomyces candidus diversity in the complex mycobiota of cow-milk bryndza cheese comprising antagonistic and sensitive strains, 2023, 388, 01681605, 110088, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110088
    9. Athina Geronikou, Nadja Larsen, Søren Kristian Lillevang, Lene Jespersen, Diversity and succession of contaminating yeasts in white-brined cheese during cold storage, 2023, 07400020, 104266, 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104266
    10. Agnieszka Krawczyk, Dominika Salamon, Kinga Kowalska-Duplaga, Barbara Zapała, Teofila Książek, Marta Drażniuk-Warchoł, Tomasz Gosiewski, Changes in the gut mycobiome in pediatric patients in relation to the clinical activity of Crohn's disease, 2023, 29, 1007-9327, 2172, 10.3748/wjg.v29.i14.2172
    11. Birbal Singh, Gorakh Mal, Rajkumar Singh Kalra, Francesco Marotta, 2024, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-65454-1, 33, 10.1007/978-3-031-65455-8_2
    12. Adalet Dishan, Yasin Ozkaya, Mehmet Cevat Temizkan, Mukaddes Barel, Zafer Gonulalan, Candida species covered from traditional cheeses: Characterization of C. albicans regarding virulence factors, biofilm formation, caseinase activity, antifungal resistance and phylogeny, 2025, 127, 07400020, 104679, 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104679
    13. Zilpa Adriana Sánchez Quitian, Guisell Mariana Pérez Rozo, Carolina Firacative, Occurrence of pathogenic Candida species in artisanal cheeses from Boyacá, Colombia, including fluconazole resistant isolates, 2024, 13, 2046-1402, 789, 10.12688/f1000research.152447.1
    14. Zilpa Adriana Sánchez Quitian, Guisell Mariana Pérez Rozo, Carolina Firacative, Occurrence of pathogenic yeast species in artisanal cheeses from Boyacá, Colombia, including fluconazole resistant isolates, 2024, 13, 2046-1402, 789, 10.12688/f1000research.152447.2
    15. Antonio A. Câmara, Larissa P. Margalho, Emilie Lang, Ramon P. Brexó, Anderson S. Sant’Ana, Yeast diversity in Brazilian artisanal cheeses: Unveiling technologically relevant species to improve traditional cheese production, 2024, 196, 09639969, 115107, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115107
    16. Aqsa Akhtar, Iqra Nasim, Muhammad Saeed ud Din, Tetsuya Araki, Nauman Khalid, Effects of different fat replacers on functional and rheological properties of low-fat mozzarella cheeses: A review, 2023, 139, 09242244, 104136, 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104136
    17. Gemilang Lara Utama, Faysa Utba, Vivi Fadilla Sari, Siti Nurmilah, Yana Cahyana, Roostita L. Balia, Exploring protein derivative profiles in cheese whey through native Candida tropicalis fermentation , 2024, 27, 1094-2912, 367, 10.1080/10942912.2024.2317746
    18. Beatriz Nunes Silva, José António Teixeira, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron, Mild Heat Treatment and Biopreservatives for Artisanal Raw Milk Cheeses: Reducing Microbial Spoilage and Extending Shelf-Life through Thermisation, Plant Extracts and Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 3206, 10.3390/foods12173206
    19. Federica Cardinali, Giorgia Rampanti, Giuseppe Paderni, Vesna Milanović, Ilario Ferrocino, Anna Reale, Floriana Boscaino, Nadja Raicevic, Masa Ilincic, Andrea Osimani, Lucia Aquilanti, Aleksandra Martinovic, Cristiana Garofalo, A comprehensive study on the autochthonous microbiota, volatilome, physico-chemical, and morpho-textural features of Montenegrin Njeguški cheese, 2024, 197, 09639969, 115169, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115169
    20. A. Yu. Tuaeva, A. M. Ponomareva, V. A. Livshits, E. S. Naumova, Yeast Microflora of Dairy Products Sold in Russia, 2024, 93, 0026-2617, 629, 10.1134/S0026261724606316
    21. Birbal Singh, Gorakh Mal, Rajkumar Singh Kalra, Francesco Marotta, 2024, Chapter 23, 978-3-031-65454-1, 507, 10.1007/978-3-031-65455-8_23
    22. V. Y. Sadvari, L. V. Shevchenko, N. M. Slobodyanyuk, O. M. Tupitska, M. S. Gruntkovskyi, S. V. Furman, Microbiome of craft hard cheeses from raw goat milk during ripening , 2024, 15, 2520-2588, 483, 10.15421/022468
    23. Pamela Anelli, Chiara Dall’Asta, Giuseppe Cozzi, Filomena Epifani, Daria Carella, Davide Scarpetta, Milena Brasca, Antonio Moretti, Antonia Susca, Analysis of composition and molecular characterization of mycobiota occurring on surface of cheese ripened in Dossena's mine, 2024, 123, 07400020, 104587, 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104587
    24. Stefano Nenciarini, Sonia Renzi, Monica di Paola, Niccolò Meriggi, Duccio Cavalieri, Ascomycetes yeasts: The hidden part of human microbiome, 2024, 16, 2692-9368, 10.1002/wsbm.1641
    25. Jasmine S. Ritschard, Markus Schuppler, The Microbial Diversity on the Surface of Smear-Ripened Cheeses and Its Impact on Cheese Quality and Safety, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 214, 10.3390/foods13020214
    26. Giorgia Rampanti, Federica Cardinali, Cindy María Bande De León, Ilario Ferrocino, Irene Franciosa, Vesna Milanović, Roberta Foligni, Luis Tejada Portero, Cristiana Garofalo, Andrea Osimani, Lucia Aquilanti, Onopordum platylepis (Murb.) Murb. as a novel source of thistle rennet: First application to the manufacture of traditional Italian raw ewe’s milk cheese, 2024, 192, 09639969, 114838, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114838
    27. Vanessa B. Paula, Luís G. Dias, Letícia M. Estevinho, Microbiological and Physicochemical Evaluation of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) and Propolis Film Coatings for Cheese Preservation, 2024, 29, 1420-3049, 1941, 10.3390/molecules29091941
    28. Gülsüm Deveci, Elif Çelik, Duygu Ağagündüz, Elena Bartkiene, João Miguel F. Rocha, Fatih Özogul, Certain Fermented Foods and Their Possible Health Effects with a Focus on Bioactive Compounds and Microorganisms, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 923, 10.3390/fermentation9110923
    29. Fernanda Palladino, Flavia B. M. Alvarenga, Rita de Cássia Lacerda Brambilla Rodrigu, Igor Jorge Boggione Santos, Carlos Augusto Rosa, Diversity of Native Yeasts Isolated in Brazil and Their Biotechnological Potential for the Food Industry, 2023, 1, 2662-8473, 81, 10.1007/s43555-023-00011-7
    30. Giorgia Perpetuini, Alessio Pio Rossetti, Arianna Rapagnetta, Rosanna Tofalo, Unlocking the potential of Kluyveromyces marxianus in the definition of aroma composition of cheeses, 2024, 15, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1464953
    31. László Gyenge, Kinga Erdő, Csilla Albert, Éva Laslo, Rozália-Veronika Salamon, The effects of soaking in salted blackcurrant wine on the properties of cheese, 2024, 10, 24058440, e34060, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34060
    32. Javier Rodríguez, Lucía Vázquez, Ana Belén Flórez, Baltasar Mayo, Epicoccum sp. as the causative agent of a reddish-brown spot defect on the surface of a hard cheese made of raw ewe milk, 2023, 406, 01681605, 110401, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110401
    33. Gregoria Mitropoulou, Ioanna Prapa, Anastasios Nikolaou, Konstantinos Tegopoulos, Theodora Tsirka, Nikos Chorianopoulos, Chrysoula Tassou, Petros Kolovos, Maria E. Grigoriou, Yiannis Kourkoutas, Effect of Free or Immobilized Lactiplantibacillus plantarum T571 on Feta-Type Cheese Microbiome, 2022, 14, 1945-0494, 10.31083/j.fbe1404031
    34. A. Yu. Tuaeva, A. M. Ponomareva, V. A. Livshits, E. S. Naumova, Yeast microflora of dairy products sold in Russia, 2024, 93, 0026-3656, 623, 10.31857/S0026365624050106
    35. Michele de Oliveira Paiva Aragão, Fabiana Regina Lima, Fabiana Reinis Franca Passamani, Miriam Aparecida de Aguilar Santos, Jaqueline de Paula Rezende, Luís Roberto Batista, Fungal and bacterial diversity present on the rind and core of Natural Bloomy Rind Artisanal Minas Cheese from the Canastra region, Brazil, 2025, 09639969, 115724, 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115724
    36. José M. Martín Miguélez, Irene Martín, Jurgen Robledo, Sonia Ventanas, Juan J. Córdoba, Effect of Artisanal Processing on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Characteristics of Traditional Soft-Ripened Cheeses Matured with Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 231, 10.3390/foods14020231
    37. Thomas Bintsis, Maria A. Kyritsi, Impact of Commercial Protective Culture on Manouri PDO Cheese, 2025, 11, 2311-5637, 35, 10.3390/fermentation11010035
    38. Rina Mekuli, Mahtab Shoukat, Eric Dugat-Bony, Pascal Bonnarme, Sophie Landaud, Dominique Swennen, Vincent Hervé, George O'Toole, Iron-based microbial interactions: the role of iron metabolism in the cheese ecosystem, 2025, 0021-9193, 10.1128/jb.00539-24
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(13496) PDF downloads(2851) Cited by(98)

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog