Research article Topical Sections

Particle- and crack-size dependency of lithium-ion battery materials LiFePO4

  • Lithium-ion batteries have become a widely-used commodity for satisfying the world’s mobile power needs. However, the mechanical degradation of lithium-ion batteries initiated by micro cracks is considered to be a bottleneck for advancing the current technology. This study utilizes a finite element method-based virtual crack closure technique to obtain particle- and crack-size-dependent estimates of mixed-mode energy release rates and stress intensity factors. Interfacial cracks in orthotropic bi-materials are considered in the current study, whereas the crack extension along the interface is assumed. The results show that energy release rate, stress intensity factor, and the propensity of crack extension are particle- and crack-size- dependent. In particular, our results show that for smaller plate-like LiFePO4 particles (100 nm × 45 nm), a crack has lesser tendency to extend if crack-to-particle size is less than 0.2, and for 200 nm × 90 nm particles, similar results are obtained for crack-to-particle sizes of less than 0.15. However, for larger particles (500 nm × 225 nm), it requires an almost flawless particle to have no crack extension. Therefore, the current study provides insight into the fracture mechanics of LiFePO4 and the associated crack-to-particle size dependency to prevent crack extensions.

    Citation: Michael A. Stamps, Jeffrey W. Eischen, Hsiao-Ying Shadow Huang. Particle- and crack-size dependency of lithium-ion battery materials LiFePO4[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(1): 190-203. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.1.190

    Related Papers:

    [1] Imran Siddique, Yasir Khan, Muhammad Nadeem, Jan Awrejcewicz, Muhammad Bilal . Significance of heat transfer for second-grade fuzzy hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking Riga wedge. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 295-316. doi: 10.3934/math.2023014
    [2] Mushtaq Ahmad, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Ali Akgül, Dumitru Baleanu . Analytical solutions for free convection flow of Casson nanofluid over an infinite vertical plate. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2344-2358. doi: 10.3934/math.2021142
    [3] Taqi A. M. Shatnawi, Nadeem Abbas, Wasfi Shatanawi . Comparative study of Casson hybrid nanofluid models with induced magnetic radiative flow over a vertical permeable exponentially stretching sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20545-20564. doi: 10.3934/math.20221126
    [4] J. Kayalvizhi, A. G. Vijaya Kumar, Ndolane Sene, Ali Akgül, Mustafa Inc, Hanaa Abu-Zinadah, S. Abdel-Khalek . An exact solution of heat and mass transfer analysis on hydrodynamic magneto nanofluid over an infinite inclined plate using Caputo fractional derivative model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3542-3560. doi: 10.3934/math.2023180
    [5] Yousef Jawarneh, Samia Noor, Ajed Akbar, Rafaqat Ali Khan, Ahmad Shafee . Intelligent neural networks approach for analysis of the MHD viscous nanofluid flow due to rotating disk with slip effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 10387-10412. doi: 10.3934/math.2025473
    [6] Sami Ul Haq, Saeed Ullah Jan, Syed Inayat Ali Shah, Ilyas Khan, Jagdev Singh . Heat and mass transfer of fractional second grade fluid with slippage and ramped wall temperature using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3056-3088. doi: 10.3934/math.2020198
    [7] Abdelraheem M. Aly, Abd-Allah Hyder . Fractional-time derivative in ISPH method to simulate bioconvection flow of a rotated star in a hexagonal porous cavity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31050-31069. doi: 10.3934/math.20231589
    [8] Subhan Ullah, Hassan Ali Ghazwani, Dolat Khan, Zareen A. Khan . Heat transfer augmentation of Jeffery–Hamel hybrid nanofluid in a stretching convergent/divergent channel through porous medium. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 388-402. doi: 10.3934/math.2025018
    [9] Xiping Liu, Mei Jia, Zhanbing Bai . Nonlocal problems of fractional systems involving left and right fractional derivatives at resonance. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3331-3345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020214
    [10] Humaira Yasmin, Rawan Bossly, Fuad S. Alduais, Afrah Al-Bossly, Anwar Saeed . Analysis of the radiated ternary hybrid nanofluid flow containing TiO2, CoFe2O4 and MgO nanoparticles past a bi-directional extending sheet using thermal convective and velocity slip conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9563-9594. doi: 10.3934/math.2025441
  • Lithium-ion batteries have become a widely-used commodity for satisfying the world’s mobile power needs. However, the mechanical degradation of lithium-ion batteries initiated by micro cracks is considered to be a bottleneck for advancing the current technology. This study utilizes a finite element method-based virtual crack closure technique to obtain particle- and crack-size-dependent estimates of mixed-mode energy release rates and stress intensity factors. Interfacial cracks in orthotropic bi-materials are considered in the current study, whereas the crack extension along the interface is assumed. The results show that energy release rate, stress intensity factor, and the propensity of crack extension are particle- and crack-size- dependent. In particular, our results show that for smaller plate-like LiFePO4 particles (100 nm × 45 nm), a crack has lesser tendency to extend if crack-to-particle size is less than 0.2, and for 200 nm × 90 nm particles, similar results are obtained for crack-to-particle sizes of less than 0.15. However, for larger particles (500 nm × 225 nm), it requires an almost flawless particle to have no crack extension. Therefore, the current study provides insight into the fracture mechanics of LiFePO4 and the associated crack-to-particle size dependency to prevent crack extensions.


    It is very tough to visualize humans living in a recent time without heat transference. Maximum heat transmission processes in heat systems are achieved by employing the thermal transmission of fluids. The utilization of conventional thermal transfer fluids like ethylene glycol, water, engine oil and methanol is finite because of their short heat conductions [1]. For the advancement of the energy effectiveness of systems in different fields of science and engineering, the conventional thermal transference of fluids was substituted by nanofluids (NFs) [2]. NFs are an emulsion of little complex non-metallic or metallic elements, named nanoparticles in the base as mentioned for earlier liquids [3]. Through the more significant heat conduction of nanoparticles, the use of NFs boosts the thermal transmission. The NFs, in terms of their thermal performance, construction, solidity, and properties, were studied by Aydin and Guru [4]. Although NFs are formed through scattering one kind of nanoparticles in the base liquid, the thermal characteristics of NFs might be enhanced by using hybrid nanofluids (HNFs). HNFs combine two or more two different nanoparticles in the base liquid. Suitable nanoparticle kinds with precise weight percent are utilized to attain the required thermal exchange percentage. The HNFs institute enormous utilization in various features of the human life cycle, for instance, in defense, microfluidics and transportation [5,6], in this mode, the idea of HNFs has been the topic of several numerical and experimental investigations. An excellent analysis of HNFs, their techniques of preparation and the features affecting their performance and areas of employment were examined in [7]. The water-based HNF of silicon dioxide and graphite was groomed by Dalkılıç et al. [8], and its thickness in dissimilar NP volume fractions and temperatures was calculated. The thickness increases by the volume fraction rise and temperature decline were established; the maximum thickness increase was also attained. Numerous researches work on the movement of HNFs have been investigated in the relevant literature; see [9,10]. A Casson fluid is an essential form of non-Newtonian fluid that acts identical to a flexible solid in which no movement happens with minor yield stress [11]. It is appropriate for cooling and heating operations because of its powerful influence on the energy communication rate, which qualifies it for application in numerous fields like diet processing, drilling, metallurgy, and biotechnology developments. A Casson fluid is helpful during the construction of printing ink [12]. Casson fluid is also proficiently efficient at describing many polymers' movement features extensively [13].

    Moreover, experiments based on blood have established that blood can perform as a Casson fluid [14,15]. Human blood, tomato sauce, custard, toothpaste, foams, starch suspensions, yogurt, nail polish and molten cosmetics are well-known examples of this fluid. Recently, Mustafa et al. [16] testified, when the speed is reducing and temperature is growing, raising the Casson parameter increases shear stress as well as thermal transfer. Mukhopadhyay et al. [17] exploited the shooting technique to study the flow of a Casson liquid as well as energy communication. Khalid et al. [18] studied the magneto-natural convection flow of a Casson fluid on a plate in a porous medium. Animasaun et al. [19] verified that the development in the Casson constraint source estimations enhances curve growth and reduces temperature curves. The influence of chemical reactions with a Casson liquid and a sphere was reviewed in [20]. Makinde et al. [21] discussed a meaningful connection between the influence of the Lorentz force and the movement of Casson fluid. The influence and skill of HNFs as the heat transfer fluid with a moving surface were numerically examined in [22]. A numerical investigation was done to study the HNFs boundary layer flow by Khashi'ie et al. [23]. They proved that the surface of a flat plate reduces the difference of the boundary layer and improves the heat transmission phenomena. The numerical solution and stability investigation for HNFs flow on a porous stretching/shrinking cylinder was discussed in [24] by utilizing the bvp4c problem solver in the Matlab package. They proved that a rise in the melting factor decreases the quantity of heat transmission and boosts the difference in the boundary layer. Ahmad et al. [25] investigated the analytical solution of a Casson NF flowing on an infinite vertical plate by utilizing the Caputo fractional derivatives definition.

    The construction of different physical phenomena consequences complicated partial differential equations. The solution to such problems is relatively substantial in evaluating diverse types of physical phenomena. Fractional calculus excellently defines different approaches for investigating this type of problem. The terms, with the local and non-local kernels, are proficiently conserved by fractional technique. In the branch of fractional calculus, Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Atangana-Baleanu (AB) approaches are well-known techniques which have been extensively applied by investigators for several years in the past [26,27]. A well-known Indian mathematician, Tialk Raj Prabhakar, anticipated an innovative fractional operator along with three parameters. The Prabhakar fractional operator is a Mittag-Leffer function with three dissimilar fractional derivative operators. This operator has Mittag-Leffer tails using classical kernels positively [28]. Ali et al. [29] applied a Laplace transform and fractional approach to discuss a viscous fractional fluid model. Raza et al. [30,31] applied Prabhakar and Caputo fractional approach and a Laplace transform to study different fluid models and tools to improve the thermal transfer methods. Samia et al. [32] discussed a rate-type fractional model with a semi-analytical approach. Different numerical familiar techniques were applied for a fractional Oldroyd-B fluid mathematical model in [33]. Wang et al. [34] applied a Prabhakar approach to examine the blood-based HNF models with diverse nanoparticles by considering the Newtonian heating effect. Jie et al. [35] discussed the Brinkman NF fractional model and sinusoidal oscillations and submitted significant results. Suganya et al. [36] discussed an innovative numerical technique for 2-D stimulation energy along with an unsteady and revolving HNF flow for stretching and moving surfaces by exploiting the explicit finite-difference method. Their results revealed that the stimulation energy controls the thermal transmission amount. Abu Bakar et al. [37]studied the flow of HNFs over a porous medium along with the slip and radiation effects on a shrinking sheet by employing the shooting method. They perceived the rise of thermal transfer in the HNF relative to the usual NF. Shoeibi et al. [38] studied the glass chilling of a double-slope lunar still by utilizing an HNF (TiO2-Al2O3) at a 0.4% concentration numerically. Kanti et al. [39] applied the two-step technique to formulate the nanofluids. Their results exposed that the thermal conductivity of the NFs increased with increasing concentration and temperature. Nadeem et al. [40] discussed the heat transmission and MHD (magnetohydrodynamics) second-grade stagnation point flow of HNF with a convectively heated porous sheet to enhance the quantity of heat transfer by exploiting the numerical bvp4c method.

    After reviewing the above literature, we have examined the Casson NF with sinusoidal heat transference and slip boundaries in this article. Different nanoparticles, i.e., copper $ \left(Cu\right) $, titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $ and aluminum oxide $ \left(A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}\right) $ have been utilized for the suspension of NFs with water as the base fluid. The comparative analysis of the attained results of governed equations with innovative fractional derivatives, i.e., AB and CF-time fractional derivatives are examined. The semi-analytical solution of thermal and momentum fields is attained with the assistance of the Laplace transform and some numerical methods. To analyze the effects of different parameters on the governing equations, graphical and numerical comparisons are discussed with different values of parameters. Furthermore, the numerical comparison of the Nusselt number and skin friction is inspected at different times and numerical schemes.

    In this manuscript, we have supposed a free mixed-convection viscous Casson NF flowing on an oscillating poured inclined plate due to the influence of applied inclined magnetic field with a strength of $ {B}_{o} $. The flowing Casson fluid is mixed with different $ (A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}, Cu, Ti{O}_{2}) $ nanoparticles. Thermophysical properties and their values of base fluid and nanoparticles are described in Tables 1 and 2. Primarily at $ t = 0 $, the temperature and inclined poured plate are both in a stable position. With the time at $ t > {0}^{+} $, the inclined plate begins to vibrate with a velocity $ {U}_{o}Cos\left(\omega t\right) $, where $ \omega $ shows the frequency of oscillations of the inclined plate. Due to the plate oscillations and rise in the thermal profile, the fluid also begins to flow on the oscillating plate with the same velocity as the plate oscillations, as displayed in Figure 1.

    Table 1.  Model for thermophysical properties of NF quantities.
    Thermal features Regular NF
    Density $ {\rho }_{f}=\frac{{\rho }_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\rho }_{s}}{{\rho }_{s}}} $
    Dynamic Viscosity $ {\mu }_{f}={\mu }_{nf}{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5} $
    Electrical conductivity $ {\sigma }_{f}=\frac{{\sigma }_{nf}}{\left(1+\frac{3\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}-1\right)\varphi }{\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}+2\right)-\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}-1\right)\varphi }\;\;\;\;\right)} $
    Thermal conductivity $ {k}_{f}=\frac{{k}_{nf}}{\left(\frac{{k}_{s}+\left(n-1\right){k}_{f}-\left(n-1\right)\left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)\varphi }{{k}_{s}+\left(n-1\right){k}_{f}+\left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)\varphi }\;\;\;\;\;\;\right)} $
    Heat capacitance $ {\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{f}=\frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)\;}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)\;}_{f}}} $
    Thermal Expansion Coefficient $ {\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{f}=\frac{{\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho \beta \right)\;\;}_{s}}{{\left(\rho \beta \right)\;\;}_{f}}} $

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Thermal characteristics of base fluids and nanoparticles [45].
    Material Water Al2O3 Cu TiO2
    $ \rho \left(kg/{m}^{3}\right) $ 997.1 3970 8933 4250
    $ {C}_{p}\left(J/kgK\right) $ 4179 765 385 686.2
    $ k\left(W/mK\right) $ 0.613 40 401 8.9528
    $ {\beta }_{T}\times {10}^{5}\left({K}^{-1}\right) $ 21 0.85 1.67 0.90

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  Geometry of the flow.

    By neglecting the pressure gradient and utilizing the Boussinesq's [41,42] and Rosseland estimations, the governed equations for this fractional model can be originated as follows [43,44]:

    $ {\rho }_{nf}\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial t} = {\mu }_{nf}\left(1+\frac{1}{{\lambda }_{1}^{*}}\right)\frac{{\partial }^{2}w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\sigma }_{nf}{B}_{o}^{2}Sin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mu }_{nf}\varphi }{K}\right)w\left(\xi , t\right)+g{\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{nf}\left[T\left(\xi , t\right)-\\ \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad {T}_{\infty }\right]Cos\left({\theta }_{2}\right) , $ (1)
    $ {\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{nf}\frac{\partial T(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {k}_{nf}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (2)

    with suitable conditions, as follows

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = {T}_{\infty };\xi > 0 , $ (3)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = {U}_{o}Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{
    T+(TwT)tto,0<tto,Tw,t>to,
    \right. $
    (4)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to {T}_{\infty };\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $ (5)

    Now, we introduce the appropriate non-dimensional parameters to non-dimensionalize the leading perspective conditions, Eqs (1) and (2):

    $ {w}^{*} = \frac{w}{{w}_{o}}, {\xi }^{*} = \frac{\xi {U}_{o}}{{\upsilon }_{f}}, {h}^{*} = \frac{h{U}_{o}^{2}}{\upsilon }{t}^{*} = \frac{t}{{t}_{o}}, {t}_{o} = \frac{{\upsilon }_{f}}{{U}_{o}^{2}}, {T}^{*} = \frac{T-{T}_{\infty }}{{T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty }} . $

    By neglecting the star notation, the governing Eqs (1) and (2) and corresponding conditions in the non-dimensional form will become as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}\frac{\partial w(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (6)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\frac{\partial T(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (7)

    with the non-dimensional conditions:

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0;\xi > 0 , $ (8)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{
    t,0<t1,1,t>1,
    \right. $
    (9)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0;\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $ (10)

    In Eq (8) the initial conditions of the flowing mathematical model are described with the zero velocity and temperature at time $ t = 0 $. And in Eq (9) the boundary conditions at $ \xi = 0 $ are described with slipping boundary effect and sinusoidal thermal conditions, where

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1} = \left(1-\varphi \right){\rho }_{f}+\varphi \frac{{\rho }_{s}}{{\rho }_{f}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2} = \frac{1}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3} = \frac{{\sigma }_{hnf}}{{\sigma }_{f}} , $
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4} = \left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {\beta }_{T}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {\beta }_{T}\right)}_{f}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5} = \left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{f}} , $
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6} = \frac{\left(1-\varphi \right)+2\varphi \frac{{k}_{s}}{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}ln\left(\frac{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}{2{k}_{f}}\right)}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+2\varphi \frac{{k}_{s}}{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}ln\left(\frac{{k}_{s}{+k}_{f}}{2{k}_{f}}\right)}, {\lambda }_{1} = 1+\frac{1}{{\lambda }_{1}^{*}}, Gr = \frac{{g\beta }_{f}\left({T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty }\right)}{{U}_{o}^{3}} , $
    $ Pr = \frac{{\mu }_{f}{\left({C}_{p}\right)}_{f}}{{k}_{f}}, M = \frac{{\upsilon }_{f}{\sigma }_{f}{B}_{o}^{2}}{{\rho }_{f}{U}_{o}^{2}}, K = \frac{k{U}_{o}^{2}}{{\upsilon }_{f}\varphi } . $

    Definition 1. The mathematical form of the AB-fractional derivative for the function $ u\left(y, t\right) $ is

    $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }u\left(y, t\right) = \frac{1}{1-\beta }{\int }_{0}^{t}{E}_{\beta }\left[\frac{\beta {\left(t-z\right)}^{\beta }}{1-\beta }\right]{{u}^{\mathrm{\text{'}}}}_{\left(y, t\right)}dt; 0 < \beta < 1 , $ (11)

    where $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ is the AB-fractional operator with fractional order parameter$ \beta $ [46] and $ {E}_{\beta }\left(z\right) $ is a Mittag-Leffer function with the mathematical form of

    $ {E}_{\beta }\left(z\right) = \sum _{r = 0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{{z}^{\beta }}{\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(r\beta +1\right)};z\in \mathbb{C} . $

    The Laplace transform of the AB-fractional derivative (Eq(5)) can be well-defined as [47]

    $ \mathcal{L}\left\{{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }w\left(\xi , t\right)\right\} = \frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta } , $ (12)

    where $ q $ is the transformed constraint via the Laplace scheme.

    Definition 2. The CF-time-fractional derivative for the function $ u\left(y, t\right) $ can be notarized as

    $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }u\left(y, t\right) = \frac{1}{1-\alpha }{\int }_{0}^{t}exp\left(\frac{\alpha \left(1-\tau \right)}{1-\alpha }\right){u}^{\text{'}}\left(y, t\right)d\tau ; 0 < \alpha < 1 , $ (13)

    where $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $ is the CF-fractional operator with non-integer order $ \alpha $, and its Laplace transformation is [48,49]

    $ \mathcal{L}\left\{{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }w\left(\xi , t\right)\right\} = \frac{s\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\alpha \right)s+\alpha } . $ (14)

    The dimensionless version of the AB-fractional model may be attained by substituting the partial derivative with the AB-time fractional operator $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ of Eqs (6) and (7).

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }w(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (15)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }T(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (16)

    where $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ signifies the AB-fractional operator.

    Using the Laplace transform to solve the energy equation (Eq (16)), we have

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\left(\frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[T(\xi , t)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}\bar{T}(\xi , 0)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{T}(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} $ (17)

    with the following transformed conditions:

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}, \;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;\bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $

    Exploiting the above transformed conditions, the simulation of the energy profile is summarized as

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}} . $ (18)

    In Tables 35, we show the inverse results for Eq (18) that were obtained numerically by using inverse procedures such as the Stehfest and Tzou's approaches.

    Table 3.  Numerical analysis results for the Nusselt number $ Nu $ for the AB- and CF-fractional models.
    $ \boldsymbol{\alpha }, \boldsymbol{\beta } $ $ \boldsymbol{\varphi } $ $ \boldsymbol{t} $ $ \boldsymbol{N}\boldsymbol{u}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ \boldsymbol{N}\boldsymbol{u}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $
    0.1 0.00 0.1 0.6300 0.6410
    0.4 0.01 0.1 0.7200 0.7589
    0.7 0.02 0.1 0.9153 0.9761
    0.9 0.03 0.1 1.2046 1.2565
    0.1 0.00 0.3 0.6202 0.6310
    0.4 0.01 0.3 0.7088 0.7471
    0.7 0.02 0.3 0.9011 0.9609
    0.9 0.03 0.3 1.1859 1.2369
    0.1 0.00 0.5 0.5955 0.6059
    0.4 0.01 0.5 0.6806 0.7174
    0.7 0.02 0.5 0.8653 0.9227
    0.9 0.03 0.5 1.1387 1.1877
    0.1 0.00 0.8 0.6106 0.6213
    0.4 0.01 0.8 0.6978 0.7356
    0.7 0.02 0.8 0.8872 0.9461
    0.9 0.03 0.8 1.1676 1.2178

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Numerical analysis results for the skin friction $ {C}_{f} $ at different time.
    $ \boldsymbol{\beta } $ $ \boldsymbol{t}={\bf{1.0}} $ $ \boldsymbol{t}={\bf{1.5}} $
    $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $
    0.1 0.1201 0.1546 0.7407 0.7590
    0.2 0.1384 0.1993 0.7541 0.7851
    0.3 0.1679 0.2484 0.7750 0.8150
    0.4 0.2083 0.3025 0.8034 0.8496
    0.5 0.2601 0.3624 0.8401 0.8903
    0.6 0.3243 0.4286 0.8869 0.9391
    0.7 0.4027 0.5014 0.9471 0.9990
    0.8 0.4967 0.5793 1.0264 1.0747
    0.9 0.6050 0.6550 1.1349 1.1720

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Numerical analysis results for the velocity and temperature profile.
    $ \boldsymbol{\xi } $ Velocity (Stehfest) Velocity (Tzou's) Temperature (Stehfest) Temperature (Tzou)
    AB CF AB CF AB CF AB CF
    0.1 1.8385 1.8236 1.8203 1.8179 0.7294 0.7258 0.7389 0.7352
    0.3 1.9869 2.0373 1.9890 2.0235 0.6074 0.5984 0.6154 0.6064
    0.5 1.9289 2.0150 1.9456 1.9963 0.5059 0.4934 0.5126 0.5000
    0.7 1.7664 1.8673 1.7927 1.8461 0.4212 0.4067 0.4269 0.4123
    0.9 1.5601 1.6622 1.5917 1.6404 0.3507 0.3353 0.3555 0.3399
    1.1 1.3447 1.4401 1.3787 1.4189 0.2920 0.2763 0.2960 0.2802
    1.3 1.1394 1.2239 1.1735 1.2041 0.2431 0.2277 0.2464 0.2310
    1.5 1.9533 1.0254 0.9862 1.0073 0.2024 0.1876 0.2052 0.1904
    1.7 0.7902 0.8498 0.8208 0.8337 0.1684 0.1546 0.1708 0.1569
    1.9 0.6502 0.6983 0.6781 0.6842 0.1402 0.1274 0.1422 0.1293

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Applying the Laplace transform to Eq (15) and its accompanying conditions, we acquire the velocity solution as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}\left(\frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)\bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right) $
    $ +{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)\bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) $ (19)

    with the transformed conditions:

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = \frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}} \;\text{and }\; \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $ (20)

    Utilizing conditions of Eq (20), the solution of Eq (19) will become

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1}{1+h\sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}}\times $
    $ \left(\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{1+h\sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}+\frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}}\right)\times $
    $ {e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}}- $
    $ \frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)} . $ (21)

    By substituting the partial derivative with respect to time with the CF-fractional operator $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $, the model equations for the CF-fractional derivative will be obtained as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }w(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (22)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }T(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (23)

    where $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $ signifies the CF-fractional operator. With the following transformed conditions:

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0;\xi > 0 , $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{
    t,0<t1,1,t>1,
    \right. $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0;\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $

    Because the thermal profile in Eq (23) is agnostic of the momentum profile, applying the Laplace transform to the heat equation (Eq (23)) yields

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\left(\frac{s\mathcal{L}\left[T(\xi , t)\right]-T(\xi , 0)}{\left(1-\alpha \right)s+\alpha }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{T}(\xi , s)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (24)

    with the following conditions:

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-s}}{{s}^{2}}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;\bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $

    Employing the above conditions, the thermal profile will be

    $ \bar{\vartheta }\left(y, s\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-s}}{{s}^{2}}{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}}\frac{{\mathrm{a}}_{1}\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{s}+{\mathrm{a}}_{2}}\right)}} . $ (25)

    Again the Laplace inverse of the above equation can be observed numerically in Table 4.

    Now, for the velocity solution, apply the Laplace transform to the CF-fractional version given by Eq (22), as well as the temperature solution found in Eq (25)

    $ \frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{\mathrm{a}}_{1}\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{s}+{\mathrm{a}}_{2}}\right)\bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right) = -\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right) , $ (26)

    with the following conditions:

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = \frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{s}^{2}} $ and $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty. $ (27)

    Using the condition mentioned earlier, the follow-up studies of Eq (26) may be obtained.

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right) = \frac{1}{1+h\sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}}\times $
    $ \left(\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{1+h\sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}+\frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}}\right)\times $
    $ {e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}}-\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)} . $ (28)

    We will utilize Stehfest and Tzou's numerical methods to compute the inverse Laplace transform of the temperature and velocity profiles using the AB and CF-fractional derivatives of Eqs (18), (21), (25) and (28), correspondingly [50,51,52]:

    $ w\left(\xi , t\right) = \frac{ln\left(2\right)}{t}\sum _{n = 1}^{M}{v}_{n}\overline{u}\left(\xi , n\frac{ln\left(2\right)}{t}\right) , $
    $ {v}_{n} = {\left(-1\right)}^{n+\frac{M}{2}}\sum _{p = \frac{q+1}{2}}^{min\left(q, \frac{M}{2}\right)}\frac{{p}^{\frac{M}{2}}\left(2p\right)!}{\left(\frac{M}{2}-p\right)!p!\left(p-1\right)!\left(q-p\right)!\left(2p-q\right)!} , $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right) = \frac{{e}^{4.7}}{t}\left[\frac{1}{2}\bar{w}\left(r, \frac{4.7}{t}\right)+Re\left\{\sum _{j = 1}^{N}{\left(-1\right)}^{k}\overline{w}\left(r, \frac{4.7+k\pi i}{t}\right)\right\}\right] . $

    The fundamental goal of this investigation was to demonstrate the importance of fractional derivatives for the Casson-type NF by means of AB and CF derivatives. For the energy and momentum equations, an NF mixed with various nanoparticles, such as $ A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}, Cu, Ti{O}_{2} $ was assumed and water was applied as the base fluid. The solution of the non-dimensional governing equations, i.e., the energy and momentum fields were found by applying the Laplace approach to the AB and CF-fractional models. The impacts of various constraints on non-dimensional governing equations are visually shown in Figures 213. The results of the numerical analysis of the Nusselt number and the skin friction are shown in Tables 35.

    Figure 2.  Temperature profile against $ \xi $ due to $ \alpha, \beta $ when $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ \varphi = 0.02 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 3.  Temperature profile against $\xi$ due to $\varphi$ when $\alpha, \beta = 0.5, P r = 6.2$, and $t = 1.0$.
    Figure 4.  Temperature profile against $ \xi $ due to $ Pr $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ \varphi = 0.0 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 5.  Velocity profile against $\xi$ due to $\alpha, \beta$ when $P r = 6.2, G r = 2.6, M = 0.85, \theta_1 = \theta_2 = \frac{\pi}{4}, K = 2.5, h = 0.5$, and $t = 1.0$.
    Figure 6.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ Pr $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, $ \varphi = 0.0 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 7.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ \varphi $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 8.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ h $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 9.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ K $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 10.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ M $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 11.  Comparison of fractional and ordinary derivative momentum and thermal fields.
    Figure 12.  Comparison of numerical schemes for momentum and thermal fields.
    Figure 13.  Comparison of thermal and momentum profiles with the results of Ahmad et al. [25].

    The effects of the fractional parameters $ \left(\alpha, \beta \right) $ on temperature are shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). It is perceived that the temperature behavior decreases with growing estimations of fractional parameters for both fractional approaches. The AB-fractional operators have a more substantial impact than the CF-fractional operators on the energy profile. Such an impact happens because of the kernel of both diverse fractional operators. Figure 2(b) also shows the comparison of two different nanoparticles indicating that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs have a relatively more progressive value than copper $ \left(Cu\right) $-based NFs, due to the physical characteristics of the considered nanoparticles. Figure 3(a) and 3(b) were made to intercept the response of the temperature profile when the volume fraction of the $ Ti{O}_{2} $ and $ Cu $ nanoparticles are equally varied. The response of the temperature field declined for improvement of the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) for both fractional models. Figure 3(b) shows that the profile of the temperature of the $ Ti{O}_{2} $-based NF was better than that of the $ Cu $-based NF. These suspension consequences are due to a growth in the thickness of the subsequent impact of the nanoparticles. Further, this effect is primarily attributed to the thermal features of the included nanoparticles, which refine the thermal presentation of the host fluid. Figure 4(a) and 4(b) were designed for the temperature profile to display the impacts of the $ Pr $; the thermal boundary layer is shown as the same for both cases of fractional techniques. The temperature profile can be perceived as reciprocal performance for heat transmission over the whole domain. Figure 4(b) shows that the temperature for the normal working-based fluid. Here, the rising impacts of $ Pr $ decelerates the temperature profile.

    The effects of the fractional parameters $ \left(\alpha, \beta \right) $ on velocity are exposed in Figure 5(a) and 5(b). It is noted that the velocity behavior also lessened with growing estimations of the fractional parameters for both cases of fractional approaches. The AB-fractional operators had a more significant impact than CF fractional operators owing to the different kernels of the diverse fractional derivatives on the velocity profile. Figure 5(b) also illustrates the comparison of two different nanoparticles, and we concluded that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs has a relatively progressive value than copper $ \left(Cu\right) $-based nanofluid, due to the physical characteristics of the considered nanoparticles, like the thermal profile.

    Figure 6(a) and 6(b) were sketched for the profile of the velocity to see the impact of $ Pr $ and it is noted that the velocity profile also had reciprocal performance for heat transmission over the whole domain due to the fact that $ Pr $ states the ratio of momentum diffusivity to thermal diffusivity. In heat transference models, $ Pr $ controls the relative viscosity of the momentum and thermal boundary layers. Figure 6(b) describes the velocity for the normal working-based fluid. The results reveal that, with the rising value of $ Pr $, the velocity profile declines. The effects of the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) on the velocity are shown in Figure 7(a) and 7(b) for both fractional models. It was detected that the velocity decelerates by increasing the estimations of $ \varphi $ because of the thermal conductivity of NFs for the $ \varphi $ parameters. Moreover, Figure 7(b) depicts that $ Ti{O}_{2} $-based NFs have a superior velocity value compared to $ Cu $-based NFs. Figure 8(a) is portrayed to examine the behavior of $ \beta $ on a velocity, along with the slip and no-slip conditions. It is observed that the velocity declines due to more significant estimations of $ \beta $. Moreover, it is distinguished that the velocity graph with slip conditions was higher than the graph without slip conditions near the oscillating plate. The effect of the Casson parameter $ {\lambda }_{1} $ on the velocity is shown in Figure 8(b). It can be seen that the velocity behavior represents the dual behavior for the Casson parameter $ {\lambda }_{1} $for both cases of fractional approaches. Initially, the momentum profile decreases due to increase in $ {\lambda }_{1} $, but and then decelerate its impact and the fluid flows more significantly. The AB-fractional operators have a more significant impact than the CF-fractional operators owing to the different kernels of the diverse fractional derivatives on the velocity.

    Figure 9(a) and 9(b) represent the velocity diagrams that can be used to understand the influence of $ Gr $ and $ K $, respectively. A rise in the velocity appeared because an enhancement in the estimations of $ Gr $ and the decreasing behavior can be seen for the porosity constraint $ K $. Physically, the upsurge in the $ Gr $ results from significant induced fluid flows because of an increase in buoyancy influences. Consequently, these forces may influence an increase in the velocity. Moreover, for the porosity constraint, physically, when in the porous medium, the holes are significantly sufficient, so the resistance of the permeability medium can be ignored. Therefore, the velocity rises as the existence of the porous surface increases the resistance to the fluid.

    Figure 10(a) illustrates the impact of the magnetic field $ M $ on the velocity. It is defined that magnetic field existence creates a Lorentz force in an electrically conducting fluid, which acts inversely to the fluid movement path if the value of $ M $ is imposed in the perpendicular direction, decelerating the velocity of the fluid. Furthermore, Figure 10(b) shows a comparison of different nanoparticles, and it is concluded that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs have a more significant impact on the momentum field as compared to the copper $ \left(Cu\right) $ and aluminum oxide $ \left(A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}\right) $ nanoparticles. Figure 11(a) and 11(b) signify the effects of ordinary and fractional derivatives on velocity and temperature. It is perceived that the velocity and temperature for the ordinary model were more extensive than those for the AB- and CF-fractional models. Figure 12(a) and 12(b) were drawn to compare two different numerical methods, i.e., the Stehfest and Tzou methods, for thermal and momentum profiles. The outcomes from both curves show a slight overlap, which signifies this work's validity. Figure 13(a) and 13(b) were plotted to check the validity of our attained results in comparison with the results of Ahmad et al. [25] for velocity and temperature fields, respectively. It can be realized from these figures that our obtained results match those acquired by Ahmad et al. [25] by the overlapping of both curves.

    Table 3 shows the numerical analysis of the Nusselt number $ Nu $ with the impact of diverse parameters for the AB and CF models. It is perceived that the value of $ Nu $ for the CF model is larger than that for the AB model. Physically, it is due to the kernels of different fractional operators. Table 4 signifies the results of the numerical investigation of the skin friction $ {C}_{f} $ with the disparity in the fractional parameters at various times for the AB- and CF-fractional derivatives; it was concluded that the value of $ {C}_{f} $ for the CF model was larger than that for the AB model. Table 5 represents the results of the numerical study of velocity and temperature via diverse numerical inverse systems for the validation and accuracy of our obtained results as well as applied techniques. Furthermore, the results of the numerical comparison of our attained temperature and velocity profiles are examined in Table 6.

    Table 6.  Numerical comparison results for the temperature and velocity with Ahmad et al. [25].
    $ \boldsymbol{\xi } $ Temperature by this study Temperature by Ahmad et al. [25] Velocity by this study Velocity by Ahmad et al. [25]
    0.1 0.9311 0.9376 0.9407 0.9363
    0.3 0.7991 0.8198 0.8710 0.8599
    0.5 0.6854 0.7151 0.7658 0.7448
    0.7 0.5877 0.6226 0.6516 0.6223
    0.9 0.5037 0.5412 0.5424 0.5076
    1.1 0.4311 0.4696 0.4446 0.4071
    1.3 0.3696 0.4068 0.3602 0.3226
    1.5 0.3164 0.3520 0.2894 0.2533
    1.7 0.2708 0.3041 0.2310 0.1976
    1.9 0.2317 0.2624 0.1835 0.1533

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The Casson nanoparticles flow via AB and CF time-fractional derivatives has been studied. An NF mixed with various nanoparticles was assumed with water as the base fluid for the energy and momentum equations. The inversion algorithms as well as the Laplace transform were employed to obtain the solutions of velocity and temperature. A comparison was carried out for the ordinary, AB- and CF models. Some consequences from the literature can also be recovered from our obtained outcomes. Some concluding remarks are as follows:

    ● Temperature and momentum fields illustrate decaying behavior for fractional parameters in the case of the AB and CF models.

    ● The response of temperature and velocity fields declined to improve the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) for both fractional models.

    ● The computations show that temperature, as well as the velocity field rate declined by growing $ Pr $ for both fractional techniques.

    ● The velocity behavior also lessened with $ {\lambda }_{1} $ for both cases of fractional approaches.

    ● An increasing behavior for the velocity appeared due to an enhancement in the estimations of $ Gr $ and decreasing behavior was seen for $ K $.

    ● The behavior of velocity declined with the growing estimations of $ M. $

    ● The velocity and temperature for the ordinary model were more extensive than those for the AB- and CF- fractional models.

    ● The comparison of the two different numerical methods, i.e., the Stehfest and Tzou methods for thermal and momentum profiles, showed that the outcomes from both curves have a slight overlap.

    ● Our obtained temperature and velocity profile results match those acquired by Ahmad et al. [25].

    ● Velocity field increases are more significant than increase in the values of $ Gr $.

    ● The solution attained via the CF approach showed more decaying behavior then the AB model.

    This research received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number B05F640092).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Energy Information Administration (2011) Global Crude Oil and Liquid Fuels Consumption. Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government.
    [2] Environmental Protection Agency (2011) 2017–2025 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. Federal Register 76(153).
    [3] Office of Atmospheric Programs (2010) Environmental Protection Agency Analysis of the American Power Act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    [4] US Department of Energy (2008) Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States. Office of Energy Statistics, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, U.S. Energy Administration. DOE/EIA-0573: 21–26.
    [5] US Department of Energy (2010) Monthly Energy Review. Office of Energy Statistics. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, U.S. Energy Administration. DOE/EIA-0035.
    [6] Padhi AK, Nanjundaswamy KS, Goodenough JB (1997) Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Electrochem Soc 144: 1188–1194. doi: 10.1149/1.1837571
    [7] Wang Y-X, Huang H-YS (2011) An Overview of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Materials. Proc. Materials Research Society 2011 Spring Meeting, pp. 1363-RR1305-1330.
    [8] Chung S-Y, Bloking JT, Chiang Y-M (2002) Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes. Nat Mater 1: 128–128.
    [9] Chung SY, Bloking JT, Chiang YM (2003) From our readers - On the electronic conductivity of phosphoolivines as lithium storage electrodes – Reply. Nat Mater 2: 702–703. doi: 10.1038/nmat1009a
    [10] Delacourt C, Poizot P, Levasseur S, et al. (2006) Size effects on carbon-free LiFePO4 powders. Electrochem Solid St 9: A352–A355. doi: 10.1149/1.2201987
    [11] Bai YM, Qiu P, Wen ZL, et al. (2010) Improvement of electrochemical performances of LiFePO4 cathode materials by coating of polythiophene. J Alloy Compd 508: 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.173
    [12] Wang Y, Huang H-YS (2012) Lithium-Ion Battery Materials and Mechanical Stress Fields. TSEST T Control Mech Syst1: 192–200.
    [13] Duong T. Directions for Energy Storage R&D in the Vehicle Technologies Program. Proc. Symposium on Energy Storage Beyond Lithium Ion: Materials Perspectives.
    [14] Reid MC (2007) Lithium Iron Phosphate Cell Performance Evaluations for Lunar Extravehicular Activities. NASA Glenn Research Center.
    [15] Chen G, Song X, Richardson TJ (2006) Electron Microscopy Study of the LiFePO4 to FePO4 Phase Transition. Electrochem Solid-St 9: A295–A298. doi: 10.1149/1.2192695
    [16] Yamada A, Koizumi H, Sonoyama N, et al. (2005) Phase change in LixFePO4. Electrochem Solid St 8: A409–A413.
    [17] Meethong N, Huang H-YS, Speakman SA, et al. (2007) Strain accommodation during phase transformations in olivine-based cathodes as a materials selection criterion for high-power rechargeable batteries. Adv Funct Mater 17: 1115–1123. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200600938
    [18] Laffont L, Delacourt C, Gibot P, et al. (2006) Study of the LiFePO4/FePO4 two-phase system by high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy. Chem Mater 18: 5520–5529. doi: 10.1021/cm0617182
    [19] Gibot P, Casas-Cabanas M, Laffont L, et al. (2008) Room-temperature single-phase Li insertion/extraction in nanoscale Li(x)FePO(4). Nat Mater 7: 741–747. doi: 10.1038/nmat2245
    [20] Zhu M, Park J, Sastry AM (2012) Fracture Analysis of the Cathode in Li-Ion Batteries: A Simulation Study. J Electrochem Soc 159: A492–A498. doi: 10.1149/2.045204jes
    [21] Zhang X, Sastry AM, Shyy W (2008) Intercalation-induced stress and heat generation within single lithium-ion battery cathode particles. J Electrochem Soc 155: A542–A552. doi: 10.1149/1.2926617
    [22] Zhao KJ, Pharr M, Vlassak JJ, et al. (2010) Fracture of electrodes in lithium-ion batteries caused by fast charging. J Appl Phys 108.
    [23] ChiuHuang CK, Huang HYS (2013) Stress Evolution on the Phase Boundary in LiFePO4 Particles. J Electrochem Soc 160: A2184–A2188. doi: 10.1149/2.079311jes
    [24] ChiuHuang C-K, Stamps MA, Huang H-YS (2013) Mechanics of Diffusion-Induced Fractures in Lithium-ion Battery Materials. Proc. Materials Research Soaciety 2013 Spring Meeting, pp. 1541-F1504-1504.
    [25] ChiuHuang C-K, Huang H-YS (2012) A Diffusion Model in a Two-Phase Interfacial Zone for Nanoscale Lithium-ion Battery Materials. Proc. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 1231–1237.
    [26] ChiuHuang CK, Huang H-YS (2015) Critical Lithiation for C-rate Dependent Mechanical Stresses in LiFePO4. J Solid State Electrochem19: 2245–2253.
    [27] Gabrisch H, Wilcox J, Doeff MM (2008) TEM study of fracturing in spherical and plate-like LiFePO4 particles. Electrochem Solid St 11: A25–A29. doi: 10.1149/1.2826746
    [28] Maxisch T, Ceder G (2006) Elastic properties of olivine LixFePO4 from first principles. Phys Rev B 73: 174112–174112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.174112
    [29] Hu Y, Zhao X, Suo Z (2010) Averting cracks caused by insertion reaction in lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Res 25:1007–1010. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2010.0142
    [30] Renganathan S, White RE (2011) Semianalytical method of solution for solid phase diffusion in lithium ion battery electrodes: Variable diffusion coefficient. J Power Sources 196: 442–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.081
    [31] Sih GC, Paris PC, Irwin GR (1965) ON CRACKS IN RECTILINEARLY ANISOTROPIC BODIES. IntJ Fract Mec 1: 189–203.
    [32] Sanford RJ (2003) Principles of fracture mechanics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    [33] Hutchinson JW, Suo Z (1992) MIXED-MODE CRACKING IN LAYERED MATERIALS. Adv Appl Mec 29: 63–191.
    [34] Qian W, Sun CT (1998) Methods for calculating stress intensity factors for interfacial cracks between two orthotropic solids. Int J Solids Struct 35: 3317–3330. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00181-9
    [35] Sun CT, Manoharan MG (1989) STRAIN-ENERGY RELEASE RATES OF AN INTERFACIAL CRACK BETWEEN 2 ORTHOTROPIC SOLIDS. J Compos Mater 23: 460–478.
    [36] Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) Finite-Element Calculation of Stress Intensity Factors by a Modified Crack Closure Integral. Eng Fract Mech 9: 931–938. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3
    [37] Dattaguru B, Venkatesha KS, Ramamurthy TS, et al. (1994) Finite-Element Estimates Of Strain-Energy Release Rate Components At The Tip of An Interface Crack Under Mode-I Loading. Eng Fract Mech 49: 451–463. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90273-9
    [38] Xie D, Waas AM, Shahwan KW, et al. (2004) Computation of energy release rates for kinking cracks based on virtual crack closure technique. Cmes-Comp Model Eng Sci6: 515–524.
    [39] Krueger R (2004) Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach, and applications. Appl Mech Rev 57: 109–143. doi: 10.1115/1.1595677
    [40] Agrawal A, Karlsson AM (2006) Obtaining mode mixity for a bimaterial interface crack using the virtual crack closure technique. Int Fracture 141: 75–98. doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-0069-4
    [41] Raju IS (1987) CALCULATION OF STRAIN-ENERGY RELEASE RATES WITH HIGHER-ORDER AND SINGULAR FINITE-ELEMENTS. Eng Fract Mech 28: 251–274. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90220-7
    [42] Woodford WH, Carter WC, Chiang YM (2012) Design criteria for electrochemical shock resistant battery electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 5: 8014–8024. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21874g
    [43] Woodford WH, Chiang YM, Carter WC (2013) Electrochemical Shock in Ion-Intercalation Materials with Limited Solid-Solubility. J Electrochem Soc 160: A1286–A1292. doi: 10.1149/2.104308jes
    [44] ChiuHuang C-K, Zhou C, Huang H-YS (2014) In-Situ Imaging of Lithium-ion Batteries Via the Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. ASME J Nanotechnol Eng Med.
    [45] Cogswell DA, Bazant MZ (2013) Theory of Coherent Nucleation in Phase-Separating Nanoparticles. Nano Lett 13: 3036–3041. doi: 10.1021/nl400497t
    [46] Cogswell DA, Bazant MZ (2012) Coherency Strain and the Kinetics of Phase Separation in LiFePO4 Nanoparticles. Acs Nano 6: 2215–2225. doi: 10.1021/nn204177u
    [47] Bai P, Cogswell DA, Bazant MZ (2011) Suppression of Phase Separation in LiFePO4 Nanoparticles During Battery Discharge. Nano Lett 11: 4890–4896. doi: 10.1021/nl202764f
    [48] Tang M, Carter WC, Chiang YM (2010) Electrochemically Driven Phase Transitions in Insertion Electrodes or Lithium-Ion Batteries: Examples in Lithium Metal Phosphate Olivines. Annu Rev Mater Res 40: 501–529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104435
    [49] Streltsov VA, Belokoneva EL, Tsirelson VG, et al. (1993) MULTIPOLE ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTRON-DENSITY IN TRIPHYLITE, LIFEPO4, USING X-RAY-DIFFRACTION DATA. Acta Crystallogr B 49: 147–153. doi: 10.1107/S0108768192004701
    [50] Zhao K, Pharr M, Cai S, et al. (2011) Large Plastic Deformation in High-Capacity Lithium-Ion Batteries Caused by Charge and Discharge RID F-8640-2010 RID G-3919-2010 RID F-5774-2010 RID B-1067-2008. J Am Ceram Soc 94: S226–S235. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04432.x
    [51] Zhao K, Wang WL, Gregoire J, et al. (2011) Lithium-Assisted Plastic Deformation of Silicon Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries: A First-Principles Theoretical Study RID F-8640-2010 RID G-3919-2010 RID B-1067-2008. Nano Lett 11: 2962–2967. doi: 10.1021/nl201501s
    [52] Rousse G, Rodriguez-Carvajal J, Patoux S, et al. (2003) Magnetic structures of the triphylite LiFePO4 and of its delithiated form FePO4. Chem Mater 15: 4082–4090.
    [53] Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME (1989) Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Willey and Sons, Inc.
    [54] Cook RD (1995) Finite element modeling for stress analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
    [55] Ansys I (2013) ANSYS commands reference, release 15.0, ANSYS, Inc, Canonsburg, PA.
    [56] Hwu CB (1993) FRACTURE PARAMETERS FOR THE ORTHOTROPIC BIMATERIAL INTERFACE CRACKS. Eng Fract Mech 45: 89–97.
    [57] Hwu CB (1993) EXPLICIT SOLUTIONS FOR COLLINEAR INTERFACE CRACK PROBLEMS. Int J Solids Struct 30: 301–312.
    [58] Wang L, Zhou F, Meng YS, et al. (2007) First-principles study of surface properties of LiFePO(4): Surface energy, structure, Wulff shape, and surface redox potential. Phys Rev B 76.
    [59] Fischer-Cripps AC (2007) Introduction to Contact Mechanics (2nd Edition), Springer, Boston, MA, USA.
    [60] Griffith AA (1921) The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids. Philos T Roy Soc A 221: 163–198. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1921.0006
    [61] Huang H-YS, Wang Y-X (2012) Dislocation Based Stress Developments in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J Electrochem Soc 159: A815–A821. doi: 10.1149/2.090206jes
    [62] Krstic VD, Khaund AK (1981) PARTICLE-SIZE DEPENDENCE OF THERMOELASTIC STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR IN 2-PHASE MATERIALS. J Mater Sci 16: 3319–3323. doi: 10.1007/BF00586292
    [63] Balluffi RW, Allen SM, Carter WC (2005) Kinetics of materials, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N.J.
    [64] Deshpande R, Verbrugge M, Cheng YT, et al. (2012) Battery Cycle Life Prediction with Coupled Chemical Degradation and Fatigue Mechanics. J Electrochem Soc 159: A1730–A1738. doi: 10.1149/2.049210jes
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ali Raza, Musawa Y. Almusawa, Qasim Ali, Absar Ul Haq, Kamel Al-Khaled, Ioannis E. Sarris, Solution of Water and Sodium Alginate-Based Casson Type Hybrid Nanofluid with Slip and Sinusoidal Heat Conditions: A Prabhakar Fractional Derivative Approach, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2658, 10.3390/sym14122658
    2. Rusya Iryanti Yahaya, Mohd Shafie Mustafa, Norihan Md Arifin, Ioan Pop, Fadzilah Md Ali, Siti Suzilliana Putri Mohamed Isa, Hybrid nanofluid flow past a biaxial stretching/shrinking permeable surface with radiation effect: Stability analysis and heat transfer optimization, 2023, 85, 05779073, 402, 10.1016/j.cjph.2023.06.003
    3. Samaira Aziz, Iftikhar Ahmad, Sami Ullah Khan, Nasir Ali, Bioconvective nonlinear radiative flow of cross nanofluid due to porous oscillating surface with variable thermal conductivity and Cattaneo–Christov model, 2023, 1745-5030, 1, 10.1080/17455030.2023.2226770
    4. Ali Raza, Rifaqat Ali, Ali Hasan Ali, Suleman H. Alfalqi, Kalsoom Chishti, Prabhakar fractional simulations for natural convective hybrid nanofluid mixed with Cu and AlO nanoparticles flowing through a channel, 2024, 12, 23071877, 25, 10.1016/j.jer.2023.08.027
    5. Areej Fatima, Muhammad Sagheer, Shafqat Hussain, A study of inclined magnetically driven Casson nanofluid using the Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model with multiple slips towards a chemically reacting radially stretching sheet, 2023, 30, 2095-2899, 3721, 10.1007/s11771-023-5485-3
    6. Wan Faezah Wan Azmi, Ahmad Qushairi Mohamad, Lim Yeou Jiann, Sharidan Shafie, Mathematical Modelling on Pulsative MHD Blood Casson Nanofluid in Slip and Porous Capillaries for Nano-cryosurgery with Caputo-Fabrizio Approach, 2025, 55, 0103-9733, 10.1007/s13538-025-01701-4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(8904) PDF downloads(1775) Cited by(10)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog