Exploring preservice primary teachers' understanding of the engineering design process through integrated STEM laboratory activities

Umran Betul Cebesoy; Umran Betul Cebesoy

doi:10.3934/steme.2026019

STEM Education

2026, Volume 6, Issue 3: 439-466. doi: 10.3934/steme.2026019

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Topical Sections

Exploring preservice primary teachers' understanding of the engineering design process through integrated STEM laboratory activities

Umran Betul Cebesoy ^,

Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Usak University, 1 Eylul Campus, Usak, Türkiye

Academic Editor: Yan Dong

Received: 06 November 2025 Revised: 17 February 2026 Accepted: 07 April 2026 Published: 06 May 2026

Effective STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education requires teachers who are well prepared to design and facilitate integrated learning experiences. However, traditional discipline-based segregated teaching continues to dominate many classrooms, limiting opportunities for meaningful integration across STEM fields. Engineering design offers a powerful pedagogical framework for bridging these disciplinary boundaries through deliberate engagement in problem-solving processes. This study examined how an engineering design–based STEM laboratory course enhanced preservice primary teachers' (PPTs) understanding and application of engineering design principles. Employing a basic qualitative research design, a 14-week course was developed in which PPTs collaborated in 10 groups to create prototypes addressing real-life problems. Data were collected through 50 reflective laboratory sheets completed by 10 participants and analyzed deductively. Findings revealed that participants initially struggled with applying the engineering design process; however, their understanding and design thinking skills improved progressively throughout the course, though this improvement was not consistent across all cases. Overall, the results highlight the potential of engineering design pedagogy in teacher education for fostering integrated STEM competencies among preservice teachers. The gradual improvement observed in participants' design thinking suggests that iterative engagement with engineering design stages supports the development of interdisciplinary connections in STEM learning. These findings position engineering design as a critical framework for building PPT's integrated STEM competencies.
- design-based learning,
- engineering design process (EDP),
- integrated STEM education,
- preservice primary teachers,
- teacher education
Citation: Umran Betul Cebesoy. Exploring preservice primary teachers' understanding of the engineering design process through integrated STEM laboratory activities[J]. STEM Education, 2026, 6(3): 439-466. doi: 10.3934/steme.2026019

Related Papers:

Abstract

Effective STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education requires teachers who are well prepared to design and facilitate integrated learning experiences. However, traditional discipline-based segregated teaching continues to dominate many classrooms, limiting opportunities for meaningful integration across STEM fields. Engineering design offers a powerful pedagogical framework for bridging these disciplinary boundaries through deliberate engagement in problem-solving processes. This study examined how an engineering design–based STEM laboratory course enhanced preservice primary teachers' (PPTs) understanding and application of engineering design principles. Employing a basic qualitative research design, a 14-week course was developed in which PPTs collaborated in 10 groups to create prototypes addressing real-life problems. Data were collected through 50 reflective laboratory sheets completed by 10 participants and analyzed deductively. Findings revealed that participants initially struggled with applying the engineering design process; however, their understanding and design thinking skills improved progressively throughout the course, though this improvement was not consistent across all cases. Overall, the results highlight the potential of engineering design pedagogy in teacher education for fostering integrated STEM competencies among preservice teachers. The gradual improvement observed in participants' design thinking suggests that iterative engagement with engineering design stages supports the development of interdisciplinary connections in STEM learning. These findings position engineering design as a critical framework for building PPT's integrated STEM competencies.

References

[1]	English, L. D., Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2017, 15(Suppl 1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
[2]	Guzey, S. S., Caskurlu, S. and Kozan, K., Integrated STEM pedagogies and student learning. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education, edited by C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, and English, L. D. Ed., 2020, 65–75. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
[3]	Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W. and Roehrig, G. H., Implementation and integration of engineering in K–12 STEM education. In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M. Cardella, Ed., 2014, 35–59. USA, Purdue University Press.
[4]	Berisha, F. and Vula, E., Introduction of integrated STEM education to pre-service teachers through collaborative action research practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2024, 22(5): 1127–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3 doi: 10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3
[5]	Sanders, M., STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 2009, 68(4): 20–26.
[6]	Bybee, R., The case of STEM education: Challenges and opportunities, Arlington, VA, USA, NSTA Press, 2013.
[7]	Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S S., Johnson, C. C. and Koehler, C. M., What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 2012,112(1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
[8]	Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C. and Lin, K. Y., A framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021, 19(8): 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y doi: 10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y
[9]	Kelley, T. R. and Knowles, J. G., Conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2016, 3(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
[10]	Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Whalen, E. R. and Wieselmann, J. R., Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 2021, 8(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8 doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
[11]	Vasquez, J. A., STEM--Beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 2015, 72(4): 10–15.
[12]	Galanti, T. M. and Holincheck, N., Beyond content and curriculum in elementary classrooms: Conceptualizing the cultivation of integrated STEM teacher identity. International Journal of STEM Education, 2022, 9(1): 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00358-8 doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00358-8
[13]	English, L. D., Adams, R. and King, D., Design learning in STEM education. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education, C. C. Johnson, Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Moore, T. J. and English, L. D. Ed., 2020, 76–86. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381
[14]	Cunningham, C. M. and Lachapelle, C. P., Ed., Designing engineering experiences to engage all students. Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices. Purzer, S., Strobel, J. and Cardella, M. Ed., 2014,117–140. West Lafeyette, Indiana, USA, Purdue University Press.
[15]	Ryu, M., Mentzer, N. and Knobloch, N., Preservice teachers' experiences of STEM integration: challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019, 29(3): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9 doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
[16]	Fan, S. C. and Yu, K. C., How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2017, 27(1): 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x doi: 10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x
[17]	National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects, Washington, DC, USA The National Academies Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
[18]	National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC, USA, The National Academies Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
[19]	Bartholomew, S. R. and Strimel, G. J., Factors influencing student success on open-ended design problems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2018, 28: 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9415-2 doi: 10.1007/s10798-017-9415-2
[20]	Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. and Leifer, L. J., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 94(1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
[21]	Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025 – 2026. Available from: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/.
[22]	Donna, J. D., A model for professional development to promote engineering design as an integrative pedagogy within STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2012, 2(2): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314866 doi: 10.5703/1288284314866
[23]	Mourtos, N. J., Defining, teaching, and assessing engineering design skills. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE), 2012, 2(1): 14–30.
[24]	Honey, M., Pearson, G. and Schweingruber, H., STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research, 2014. Washington, DC, USA, The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
[25]	Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., et al., Infusing Engineering Design into High School STEM Courses, 2011. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.
[26]	Tipmontiane, K. and Williams, P. J., The integration of the engineering design process in biology-related STEM activity: A review of Thai secondary education. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 2022, 2(1): 1–10.
[27]	English, L. D. and King, D. T., STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students' investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2015, 2(1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7 doi: 10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
[28]	Ozturk, N., Aydin-Günbatar, S. and Roehrig, G. H., Elementary science teachers' engineering integration after long-term in-service training program with and without curriculum material support. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2025, 43(1): 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996 doi: 10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996
[29]	Wendell, K. and Rogers, C., Engineering design‐based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013,102(4): 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20026 doi: 10.1002/jee.20026
[30]	Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. P., Brennan, R. T., Kelly, G. J., Tunis, C. S. A. and Gentry, C. A., The Impact of Engineering Curriculum Design Principles on Elementary Students' Engineering and Science Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2020, 57(3): 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21601 doi: 10.1002/tea.21601
[31]	Elkin, M., Sullivan, A. and Bers, M. U., Books, Butterflies, and Bots: Integrating engineering and robotics into early childhood curricula. In Early Engineering Learning, L. D. English and T. Moore, Ed., 2018,225–248. Singapore: Springer.
[32]	Aydin-Günbatar, S., Ozturk, N. and Roehrig, G. H., A closer examination of earth and life science teachers' science and engineering integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2025, 34(1): 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10161-5 doi: 10.1007/s10956-024-10161-5
[33]	Estapa, A. T., and Tank, K. M., Supporting integrated stem in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 2017, 4(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3 doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3
[34]	Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J. and Harwell, M., Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based stem integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2016, 6(1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129 doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1129
[35]	Kelley, T. R. and Sung, E., Sketching by design: Teaching sketching to young learners. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2017, 27(3): 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3 doi: 10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3
[36]	Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M. and Bugallo, M. F., NGSS-Based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 2021, 8(1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1 doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
[37]	Mesutoglu, C. and Baran, E., Examining the development of middle school science teachers' understanding of engineering design process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2020, 18(8): 1509–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10041-0 doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-10041-0
[38]	O'Brien, S., Karsnitz, J., Sandt, S., Bottomley, L. and Parry, E., Engineering in pre-service teacher education. In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M. Cardella, Ed., 2014,277–299. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
[39]	Capobianco, B. M., Radloff, J. and Clingerman, J., Facilitating preservice elementary science teachers' shift from learner to teacher of engineering design-based science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2022, 20(4): 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10193-y doi: 10.1007/s10763-021-10193-y
[40]	Aydın-Günbatar, S., Tarkın-Çelikkıran, A., Kutucu, E. S. and Ekiz-Kıran, B., the influence of a design-based elective STEM course on pre-service chemistry teachers' content knowledge, STEM conceptions, and engineering views. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2018, 19(3): 954–972. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00128F
[41]	Kuvac, M. and Koc, I., Enhancing preservice science teachers' perceptions of engineer and engineering through stem education: a focus on drawings as evidence. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2023, 41(4): 1539–1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038 doi: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038
[42]	Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T. and Williams, P. J., Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers' engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 2021, 8(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9 doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
[43]	Maiorca, C. and Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Elementary preservice teachers' integration of engineering into stem lesson plans. School Science and Mathematics, 2020,120(7): 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12433 doi: 10.1111/ssm.12433
[44]	Capobianco, B. M. and Radloff, J., Elementary preservice teachers' trajectories for appropriating engineering design–based science teaching. Research in Science Education, 2022, 52(5): 1623–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y
[45]	Shahat, M. A., Al-Balushi, S. M. and Al-Amri, M., Measuring preservice science teachers' performance on engineering design process tasks: implications for fostering STEM education. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 2024, 42(2): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-12-2022-0277 doi: 10.1108/AGJSR-12-2022-0277
[46]	Caelli, K., Ray, L. and Mill, J., 'Clear as Mud': Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2003, 2(2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406903002002 doi: 10.1177/1609406903002002
[47]	Merriam, S. B., Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
[48]	Higher Education Council (HEC), Ogretmen Yetistirme ve Egitim Fakulteleri (1982–2007)[Teacher training and faculties of education (1982–2007)], 2007, Ankara, Türkiye: Higher Education Council.
[49]	Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 2004, 16(3): 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
[50]	Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., et al., Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 2022, 12: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
[51]	Dwyer, S. C. and Buckle, J. L., The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2009, 8(1): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069090080010 doi: 10.1177/16094069090080010
[52]	Ozkizilcik, M. and Cebesoy, U. B., The influence of an engineering design-based STEM Course on pre-service science teachers' understanding of STEM disciplines and engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2024, 34(2): 727–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09837-7 doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09837-7
[53]	Ozkızılcık, M., Investigation of prospective science teachers' cognitive structures of stem and problem solving skills and STEM teaching orientations. Master's thesis, 2018, p. 152. Uşak University, Usak, Türkiye.
[54]	Hadi, M. A. and José Closs, S., Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38(3): 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0237-6 doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0237-6
[55]	Cresswell, J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design, 2009, Sage Publications.
[56]	Menon, D., Johnson, A. M., Cox, D., Nguyen, U., Jeon, M. and Thomas, A., STEM‐themed pathways within elementary preservice methods coursework: Benefits and challenges associated with designing and implementing integrated STEM projects. School Science and Mathematics, 2025,126(2): 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18321 doi: 10.1111/ssm.18321
[57]	Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y., et al., Exploring student engagement in STEM education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2021, 7(1): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i1.10455 doi: 10.30870/jppi.v7i1.10455

Author's biography Dr. Umran Betul Cebesoy is an Associate Professor of Science Education at Usak University, Türkiye. She specializes in socioscientific issues, decision-making in complex controversial issues, and engineering design-based STEM education. Her research interests mainly focus on how preservice teachers make decisions regarding socioscientific issues and on engineering design-based STEM laboratory applications

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)