
The composition of soils in aquifers is typically not homogeneous, and soil layers may be cracked or displaced due to geological activities. This heterogeneity in soil distribution within aquifers affects groundwater flow and water level variations. In the present study, we established a two-dimensional (2D) mathematical model that considers the influence of surface recharge on groundwater flow in heterogeneous sloping aquifers. By considering temporal variations in surface recharge, slope angle and aquifer heterogeneity, the simulated results are expected to better reflect real conditions in natural aquifers. The effects of aquifer heterogeneity on groundwater flow and water levels are particularly significant in sloping aquifers. The study's findings indicate that even when the soil composition remains constant, variations in groundwater level and flow may be considerable, depending on factors such as soil alignment, slope angle of the aquifer's base layer and the direction of water flow.
Citation: Ming-Chang Wu, Ping-Cheng Hsieh. Influence of nonuniform recharge on groundwater flow in heterogeneous aquifers[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30120-30141. doi: 10.3934/math.20231540
[1] | Kwang-Wu Chen, Fu-Yao Yang . Infinite series involving harmonic numbers and reciprocal of binomial coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 16885-16900. doi: 10.3934/math.2024820 |
[2] | Zhi-Hong Sun . Supercongruences involving Apéry-like numbers and binomial coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2729-2781. doi: 10.3934/math.2022153 |
[3] | Shelby Kilmer, Songfeng Zheng . A generalized alternating harmonic series. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13480-13487. doi: 10.3934/math.2021781 |
[4] | Wenbin Zhang, Yong Zhang, Jiachen Wu . A Ramanujan-type supercongruence related to harmonic numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11444-11464. doi: 10.3934/math.2025521 |
[5] | Xuqiong Luo . A D-N alternating algorithm for exterior 3-D problem with ellipsoidal artificial boundary. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 455-466. doi: 10.3934/math.2022029 |
[6] | Jiaye Lin . Evaluations of some Euler-type series via powers of the arcsin function. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8116-8130. doi: 10.3934/math.2025372 |
[7] | Ling Zhu . Asymptotic expansion of a finite sum involving harmonic numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2756-2763. doi: 10.3934/math.2021168 |
[8] | Andrea Ratto . Higher order energy functionals and the Chen-Maeta conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1089-1104. doi: 10.3934/math.2020076 |
[9] | Aleksa Srdanov . Invariants in partition classes. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6233-6243. doi: 10.3934/math.2020401 |
[10] | Kholood M. Alsager, Sheza M. El-Deeb, Ala Amourah, Jongsuk Ro . Some results for the family of holomorphic functions associated with the Babalola operator and combination binomial series. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29370-29385. doi: 10.3934/math.20241423 |
The composition of soils in aquifers is typically not homogeneous, and soil layers may be cracked or displaced due to geological activities. This heterogeneity in soil distribution within aquifers affects groundwater flow and water level variations. In the present study, we established a two-dimensional (2D) mathematical model that considers the influence of surface recharge on groundwater flow in heterogeneous sloping aquifers. By considering temporal variations in surface recharge, slope angle and aquifer heterogeneity, the simulated results are expected to better reflect real conditions in natural aquifers. The effects of aquifer heterogeneity on groundwater flow and water levels are particularly significant in sloping aquifers. The study's findings indicate that even when the soil composition remains constant, variations in groundwater level and flow may be considerable, depending on factors such as soil alignment, slope angle of the aquifer's base layer and the direction of water flow.
Let N be the set of natural numbers with N0=N∪{0}. For n∈N0, the following harmonic-like numbers are given by partial sums:
● The classical harmonic number and its quadratic counterpart
Hn=n−1∑k=01k+1andH⟨2⟩n=n−1∑k=01(k+1)2. |
● Skew harmonic number and its quadratic counterpart
On=n−1∑k=012k+1andO⟨2⟩n=n−1∑k=01(2k+1)2. |
● Alternating harmonic number and its quadratic counterpart
ˉHn=n−1∑k=0(−1)kk+1andˉH⟨2⟩n=n−1∑k=0(−1)k(k+1)2. |
Among them, there are the following simple but useful relations:
H2n=On+Hn2,H⟨2⟩2n=O⟨2⟩n+H⟨2⟩n4;ˉH2n=On−Hn2,ˉH⟨2⟩2n=O⟨2⟩n−H⟨2⟩n4. |
Harmonic numbers and their variants have been studied since the distant past and are involved in diverse fields (cf. [1,5,6,7,11,17,18]) such as analysis of algorithms in computer science, various topics of number theory, and combinatorial analysis. In this paper, we aim at presenting several algebraic identities about infinite series involving harmonic-like numbers, the binomial coefficient (3nn) in numerators, and a free variable "y".
For n∈N0 and an indeterminate x, the shifted factorials (cf. [3, §1.1])) are usually defined by
(x)0=1and(x)n=x(x+1)⋯(x+n−1)forn∈N. |
Denote by [xm]ϕ(x) the coefficient of xm in the formal power series ϕ(x). Then we can express harmonic-like numbers (see [11,18]) by extracting the initial coefficients of x from the quotients of shifted factorials as below:
[x](1+x)nn!=Hn,[x2](1+x)nn!=H2n−H⟨2⟩n2,[x]n!(1−x)n=Hn,[x2]n!(1−x)n=H2n+H⟨2⟩n2,[y](12+y)n(12)n=2On,[y2](12+y)n(12)n=2(O2n−O⟨2⟩n),[y](12)n(12−y)n=2On,[y2](12)n(12−y)n=2(O2n+O⟨2⟩n). |
There exist many infinite series identities involving central binomial coefficients (see [12,14,19,25]). However, the closed form evaluations for the known series with (3nn) are rare. In a recent paper, Sun [23] reported several remarkable infinite series identities, detected by numerical experimentation. Among them, the following three (see [23, Eqs (2.12), (2.13), and (2.15)]) seem rather challenging:
∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H2n=1+√32{√3ln2−3ln(3−√3)}, | (1.1) |
∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H3n=1+√34ln(4(7+4√3)3)−√3ln2, | (1.2) |
∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn){H3n−H2n}=1+√52ln(9−3√52). | (1.3) |
When making efforts to confirm these three formulae, two substantial novelties emerged. First, not only the harmonic numbers H3n and H2n are separable in the third series, but also independent series involving Hn and On can be evaluated explicitly in closed form (cf. Corollaries 6 and 10). Another surprising novelty (see Theorems 1 and 5) lies in the fact that these series are particular cases of more general algebraic identities containing a free variable "y", corresponding to the convergent rates of these numerical series. To our knowledge, most of the infinite series identities presented in this paper have not appeared previously in the literature.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. As preliminaries, we shall evaluate, in closed form, three series containing binomial coefficient (3nn), harmonic number Hn and a free variable "y" by integrating Lambert's series. Then in Sections 3–5, three classes of infinite series with harmonic-like numbers will be examined by applying the "coefficient extraction" method (see [8,13,24]) to cubic transformations for the 3F2-series, that result in several algebraic identities about these series and confirm or refine, as special numerical examples, three conjectured identities made recently by Sun [23]. Finally, the paper will end with Section 6, where concluding remarks and further problems are provided.
In classical analysis and enumerative combinatorics, Lambert's binomial series are well-known (see Riordan [22, §4.5] and [9,10,16]), which can be reproduced as follows: Let T and τ be the two variables related by the equation τ=T/(1+T)β. Then
(1+T)α=∞∑k=0αα+kβ(α+kβk)τkand(1+T)α+11+T−Tβ=∞∑k=0(α+kβk)τk. | (2.1) |
As preliminaries, we are going to evaluate, in closed form, three series containing ternary coefficient (3nn) and a free variable "y" by integrating across the above two equations, that will be crucial for demonstrating infinite series identities involving harmonic numbers in the subsequent sections.
For "α=0 and β=3", performing the replacement τ→xy/(1+y)3 in Lambert's second series, we can state the resulting equality as
ϕ(T):=1+T1−2T=∞∑n=0(3nn)(xy)n(1+y)3n:x=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3. | (2.2) |
Since the rightmost function is monotone around T=0, it determines an implicit inverse function T=T(x) in the neighborhood of x=0 with particular values "T(0)=0 and T(1)=y".
By expressing the harmonic number Hn in terms of the integral
Hn=∫101−xn1−xdx, |
we can insert Hn in the series (2.2) as follows:
∞∑n=0(3nn)Hnyn(1+y)3n=∫10ϕ(T(1))−ϕ(T(x))1−xdx=(1+y)3y∫y01−2T(1+T)41+y1−2y−1+T1−2T1−T(1+y)3y(1+T)3dT=(1+y)3∫y01−(1−2T)(1+y)(1+T)(1−2y)T(1+y)3−y(1+T)3dT, |
where the change of variable x=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3 has been made so that the integral becomes explicit.
For the sake of brevity, the notation "ρ" will be fixed, throughout the paper, for the algebraic number
ρ:=32(√2+1)1/3−32(√2−1)1/3−1≈−0.105892543. | (2.3) |
The convergence region of the preceding series is determined by
−1<27y4(1+y)3<1,ρ<y<12. |
This can be illustrated graphically as below:
By decomposing the integrand into partial fractions
1−(1−2T)(1+y)(1+T)(1−2y)T(1+y)3−y(1+T)3=3(1+T)(1+y)2(1−2y)−32(1+y)2(1−2y)√4+y×{√4+y+√yT+√y(3+y)−(1+y)√4+y2√y+√4+y−√yT+√y(3+y)+(1+y)√4+y2√y}, |
we can explicitly compute the integral
∫y01−(1−2T)(1+y)(1+T)(1−2y)T(1+y)3−y(1+T)3dT=3ln(1+y)(1+y)2(1−2y)+3(√y−√4+y)2(1+y)2(1−2y)√4+yln((1+y)(2−2y−y2+y√y2+4y)2)−3(√y+√4+y)2(1+y)2(1−2y)√4+yln((1+y)(2−2y−y2−y√y2+4y)2). |
By cancelling the three terms containing ln(1+y) and then making substitution, we find the closed formula for the series as in the theorem below:
Theorem 1 (ρ<y<1/2).
∞∑n=1(3nn)Hnyn(1+y)3n=(1+y)3∫y01−(1−2T)(1+y)(1+T)(1−2y)T(1+y)3−y(1+T)3dT=3(1+y)ln(1−2y)2(2y−1)+3(1+y)√y2(1−2y)√4+yln(2−y(2+y−√y2+4y)2−y(2+y+√y2+4y)). |
For "α=1 and β=3", performing the replacement τ→xy/(1+y)3, we can rewrite Lambert's first series as
ψ(T):=1+T=∞∑n=0(3nn)(xy)n(1+2n)(1+y)3n:x=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3. | (2.4) |
Analogously, by putting the harmonic number Hn inside the series (2.4), we have
∞∑n=0(3nn)Hnyn(1+2n)(1+y)3n=∫10ψ(T(1))−ψ(T(x))1−xdxx=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3=(1+y)3y∫y0(y−T)(1−2T)dT(1+T)4{1−T(1+y)3y(1+T)3}=∫y0(1+y)3(T−y)(1−2T)dT(1+T){T(1+y)3−y(1+T)3}=∫y0(1+y)3(1−2T)dT(1+T)(1−T2y−Ty2−3Ty). |
By decomposing the integrand into partial fractions
(1+y)3(1−2T)dT(1+T)(1−T2y−Ty2−3Ty)=31+y1+T−(1+y)(3√y+√4+y)2√y(T+(3+y)√y+(1+y)√4+y2√y)−(1+y)(3√y−√4+y)2√y(T+(3+y)√y−(1+y)√4+y2√y), |
we can explicitly compute the integral
∫y0(1+y)3(1−2T)dT(1+T)(1−T2y−Ty2−3Ty)=3(1+y)ln(1+y)−(1+y)(3√y+√4+y)2√yln((1+y)(3√y+√4+y)(3+y)√y+(1+y)√4+y)−(1+y)(3√y−√4+y)2√yln((1+y)(3√y−√4+y)(3+y)√y−(1+y)√4+y), |
which is simplified into the closed formula as in the theorem below:
Theorem 2 (ρ<y<1/2).
∞∑n=1(3nn)Hnyn(1+2n)(1+y)3n=∫y0(1+y)3(1−2T)dT(1+T)(1−T2y−Ty2−3Ty)=(1+y)√4+y2√yln(2−y(2+y+√y2+4y)2−y(2+y−√y2+4y))−32(1+y)ln(1−2y). |
Alternatively, rewriting Lambert's first series
(1+T)α−1α=∞∑n=11α+nβ(α+nβn)τn:τ=T/(1+T)β |
and letting "α→0 and β=3", we deduce the identity
σ(T):=3ln(1+T)=∞∑n=1(3nn)(xy)nn(1+y)3n:x=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3. | (2.5) |
By inserting Hn in the above series, we obtain an integral expression
∞∑n=1(3nn)Hn(xy)nn(1+y)3n=∫10σ(T(1))−σ(T(x))1−xdxx→T(1+y)3y(1+T)3=3∫y0ln(1+T1+y)(1−2T)(1+y)3(1+T)(T−y)(1−T2y−Ty2−3Ty)dT=3∫y0ln(1+T1+y){1T−y−31+T+y2+3y+2TyT2y+Ty2+3Ty−1}dT. |
In view of the partial fraction decomposition
y2+3y+2TyT2y+Ty2+3Ty−1=1T+√y(3+y)+(1+y)√4+y2√y)+1T+√y(3+y)−(1+y)√4+y2√y), |
it suffices to evaluate, for a parameter λ subject to T+λ≠0 for T∈(0,y), the parametric integral
J(λ,y)=∫y0ln(1+T1+y)dTT+λ=Li2(1+y1−λ)−Li2(11−λ)+ln(λλ−1)ln(1+y), |
with particular cases
J(1,y)=−12ln2(1+y)andJ(−y,y)=π26+ln(1+y)ln(y1+y)−Li2(11+y). |
Hereafter, the dilogarithm function (see Lewin [20, §1.1]) is defined for all complex values of z by
Li2(z)=∫z0ln(1−τ)−τandLi2(z)=∞∑n=1znn2for|z|≤1. |
By making substitution and then simplifying the terms concerning logarithms and dilogarithms in the resulting expression, we find the explicit formula as in the following theorem:
Theorem 3 (ρ<y<1/2).
∞∑n=1(3nn)Hnynn(1+y)3n=∫y0−3dT1+Tln(1−T(1+y)3y(1+T)3)=π22+3Θ(y)+3ln(1+y)ln(y√(1+y)3), |
where, for simplicity, Θ(y) denotes the sum of five dilogarithmic values
Θ(y)=Li2(y−√y2+4y2)+Li2(y+√y2+4y2)−Li2(y−√y2+4y2+2y)−Li2(y+√y2+4y2+2y)−Li2(11+y). |
According to Bailey [3], the classical hypergeometric series reads as
1+pFp[a0,a1,a2,⋯,apb1,b2,⋯,bp|z]=∞∑k=0zkk!(a0)k(a1)k(a2)k⋯(ap)k(b1)k(b2)k⋯(bp)k. |
We shall confine ourselves only to examining the series with |z|<1 and none of the parameters in the numerator and denominator being a non-positive integer, which imply that the corresponding series is well-defined and convergent.
There are many transformation and summation formulae for hypergeometric series (see Bailey [3] and Brychkov [4, Chapter 8]) in the literature. In 1928, Bailey [2] discovered an important cubic transformation (see the next section). Half a century later, Gessel and Stanton [15, Eq (5.4)] found the following counterpart
3F2[1+a3,2+a3,3+a31+a+c2,2+a−c2|27y4(1+y)3]=(1+y)1+a1−2y×4F3[1+a3,a,c,1−ca3,1+a+c2,2+a−c2|−y4]. | (3.1) |
Under the parameter replacements "a→6ax,c→2cx", this transformation can be reformulated as
∞∑n=0(y4(1+y)3)n(1+6ax)3nn!(1+3ax−cx)n(12+3ax+cx)n=(1+y)1+6ax1−2y{1+6cx∞∑k=1(−y4)k(k+2ax)(1+6ax)k−1(1+2cx)k−1(1−2cx)kk!(1+3ax−cx)k(12+3ax+cx)k}, | (3.2) |
where "y∈(ρ,12)", or equivalently, 27y4(1+y)3∈(−1,1) so that the series are convergent.
The above transformation is an analytic equality with respect to x in the neighborhood of x=0. Equating the constant terms on both sides yields the algebraic identity below:
∞∑n=0(3nn)yn(1+y)3n=1+y1−2y. |
As illustrated in the introduction, harmonic-like numbers can be expressed in terms of x-coefficients from quotients of shifted factorials. By examining the coefficients of x across the above equation, we find that the corresponding equation involving harmonic numbers can be written as
∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a−c)Hn−2(3a+c)On}=6a1+y1−2yln(1+y)+6c1+y1−2y∞∑k=1(k−1)!(12)k(−y4)k. |
The rightmost series admits the closed form expression, as in the lemma below:
Lemma 4 (−4<y<4).
W(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!(12)k(−y4)k=−√4y4+yArcTanh√y4+y=√4y4+yln√4+y−√y2. |
Proof. Recall the beta function (see [21, §16])
B(a,b)=∫10xa−1(1−x)b−1dx=Γ(a)Γ(b)Γ(a+b),whereℜ(a)>0andℜ(b)>0. |
We can express W(y) as a definite integral
W(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!(12)k(−y4)k=∞∑k=1B(k,12)(−y4)k=∞∑k=1(−y4)k∫10xk−1dx√1−x=∫10dxx√1−x∞∑k=1(−xy4)k=∫10−ydx√1−x(4+xy)=∫10−2y4+y−T2ydT, |
where the last line is justified by the change of variable √1−x→T. Then the formula in the lemma follows by evaluating the last integral explicitly.
Therefore, we find the general formula below:
∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a−c)Hn−2(3a+c)On}=6a1+y1−2yln(1+y)+6c1+y1−2yW(y). |
By specifying two parameters, a and c, we deduce four independent series
a=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)ˉH2n=31+y1−2yW(y),c=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−H2n}=1+y1−2yln(1+y),c=3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−2On}=1+y1−2yln(1+y)−31+y1−2yW(y),c=−3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−Hn}=1+y1−2yln(1+y)+31+y1−2yW(y). |
Combining the above formulae with Theorem 1 and then keeping in mind the equalities
H2n=ˉH2n+Hn,On=ˉH2n+Hn2,H3n=(H3n−Hn)+Hn, |
we establish further closed formulae for four series with a free variable "y".
Theorem 5 (ρ<y<1/2).
(a)∞∑n=1(3nn)ˉH2nyn(1+y)3n=3+3y1−2y√4y4+yln√4+y+√y2,(b)∞∑n=1(3nn)H2nyn(1+y)3n=3+3y2−4y√y4+yln(2(1+y+√y2+4y)2−y(2+y+√y2+4y))−(3+3y)ln(1−2y)2(1−2y),(c)∞∑n=1(3nn)Onyn(1+y)3n=3+3y2−4y√y4+yln(1+y+√y2+4y√1−2y)−(3+3y)ln(1−2y)4(1−2y),(d)∞∑n=1(3nn)H3nyn(1+y)3n=1+y2−4yln((1+y)2(1−2y)3)+3+3y2−4y√y4+yln(2(1+y+√y2+4y)2−y(2+y+√y2+4y)). |
Numerous infinite series identities with different convergence rates can be derived by assigning particular values for y in Theorems 1 and 5. Five groups of representative examples are recorded as corollaries. In particular, the second formula (b) and the last formula (e) displayed in Corollary 6 confirm (1.1) and (1.2) conjectured by Sun [23, Eqs (2.12) and (2.13)].
Corollary 6 (y→3√3−52 in Theorems 1 and 5).
(a)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)ˉH2n=√3−32ln(√3−1),(b)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H2n=1+√32{√3ln2−3ln(3−√3)},(c)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)Hn=3−√34ln(43)+√3ln(2+√33),(d)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)On=3+√32{ln(1+√3√2)−√34ln3},(e)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H3n=1+√34ln(4(7+4√3)3)−√3ln2. |
Corollary 7 (y→√5−2 in Theorems 1 and 5).
(a)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)ˉH2n=3(1−√5)√5ln(√5−12),(b)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H2n=3(2+√5)√5ln(3+√52)−3ln5√5,(c)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)Hn=32ln(3+√52)+3√5ln(11+5√510),(d)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)On=3(1+√5)2√5ln(2+√5)−3ln52√5,(e)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H3n=ln(11+5√5)+3√5ln(4+2√55). |
Corollary 8 (y→√5−2√5 in Theorems 1 and 5).
(a)∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)ˉH2n=6(√5−1)11ln(5−√52),(b)∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)H2n=6√511ln(25+9√522)−311ln(23−3√510),(c)∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)Hn=−3√511ln(267−119√52)−611ln(7+√510),(d)∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)On=3(1+√5)11ln(4+√511)+3√511ln5,(e)∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)H3n=6√511ln(4(4+√5)11)+111ln(200(2667−73√5)116). |
Corollary 9 (y→−110 in Theorems 1 and 5).
(a)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)ˉH2n=−38√313ArcCos(161200),(b)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)H2n=−98ln(65)−38√313ArcCos(6780),(c)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)Hn=−98ln(65)+38√313ArcCos(79878000),(d)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)On=−916ln(65)−316√313ArcCos(720),(e)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)H3n=−38ln(3215)−38√313ArcCos(6780). |
Corollary 10 (y→7−3√52 in Theorems 1 and 5).
(a)∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn)ˉH2n=√6√5−6√5ln(1+√15+6√53+√5),(b)∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn)H2n=3(1+√5)4ln(2+√53)+√3/2√5+√5ln(3√5−1+√30−6√54),(c)∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn)Hn=3(1+√5)4ln(2+√53)+√3/2√5+√5ln(11√3+√185−82√511√3−√185−82√5),(d)∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn)On=3(1+√5)8ln(2+√53)+√3/8√5+√5ln(3√5−4+2√15−6√5),(e)∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn)H3n=1+√54ln(11+5√56)+√3/2√5+√5ln(3√5−1+√30−6√54). |
We remark that the second formula (b) and the last series (e) in this corollary refine identity (1.3) conjectured by Sun [23, Eq (2.15)]:
∞∑n=1(3+√554)n(3nn){H3n−H2n}=1+√52ln(9−3√52). |
Now, we turn to examine Bailey's cubic transformation (Bailey [2, Eq (4.05)])
3F2[a3,1+a3,2+a31+a+c2,2+a−c2|27y4(1+y)3]=(1+y)a×3F2[a,c,1−c1+a+c2,2+a−c2|−y4]. | (4.1) |
Under the parameter replacements "a→1+6ax,c→2cx", it can be reformulated as
∞∑n=0(y4(1+y)3)n(1+6ax)3nn!(1+3ax+cx)n(32+3ax−cx)n=(1+y)1+6ax×{1+2cx∞∑k=1(−y4)k(1+6ax)k(1+2cx)k−1(1−2cx)kk!(1+3ax+cx)k(32+3ax−cx)k}, | (4.2) |
where, as before, both series converge for "y∈(ρ,12)", or equivalently, 27y4(1+y)3∈(−1,1).
When x=0, the above series becomes the following simpler one:
∞∑n=0(3nn)yn(1+2n)(1+y)3n=1+y. |
Instead, the coefficients of x across (4.2) result in the general formula as below:
∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a+c)Hn−2(3a−c)On1+2n+4(3a−c)n(1+2n)2}=6a(1+y)ln(1+y)+2c(1+y)∞∑k=1(k−1)!(32)k(−y4)k. |
For brevity, we introduce the notations U(y) and V(y) for the two series:
U(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!(32)k(−y4)kandV(y)=∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3nn)n(1+2n)2. |
They are evaluated in closed form by the following lemma:
Lemma 11.
(a)U(y)=2+2√4+y√yln√4+y−√y2,−4<y<4;(b)V(y)=√(1+y)3√yln(√y+√1+y)−(1+y),ρ<y<1/2. |
Proof. The first series can be evaluated by computing the integral as follows:
U(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!(32)k(−y4)k=∞∑k=1B(k,32)(−y4)k=∞∑k=1(−y4)k∫10xk−1√1−xdx=∫10√1−xdxx∞∑k=1(−xy4)k=∫10−y√1−xdx4+xy=∫10−2yT24+y−T2ydT√1−x→T=2+2√4+y√yln√4+y−√y2. |
For the second series V(y), by shifting forward the summation index n→n+1, we can rewrite it as
V(y)=∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3nn)n(1+2n)2=y(1+y)3∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3n+3n)13+2n. |
Then, for "α=β=3", perform the replacement τ→xy/(1+y)3 in Lambert's second series
∞∑n=0xnyn(1+y)3n(3n+3n)=(1+T)41−2T. |
Now multiplying this equation by x12 and then integrating across over x∈[0,1], we can proceed with
∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3n+3n)23+2n=∫10x12(1+T)41−2Tdxx=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3=√(1+y)9y√y∫y0√T√(1+T)3dT. |
By means of integration by parts, we can further compute
∫y0√T√(1+T)3dT=−2√y√1+y+∫y01√T(1+T)dT=2ln(√y+√1+y)−2√y√1+y. |
After substitution, the second formula in Lemma 11 follows accordingly.
Therefore, we obtain the following reduced transformation:
∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a+c)Hn−2(3a−c)On1+2n}=6a(1+y)ln(1+y)+2c(1+y)U(y)−4(3a−c)V(y). | (4.3) |
By specifying two parameters, a and c in the above equality, we deduce four independent series:
a=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){ˉH2n1+2n}=(1+y)U(y)+2V(y),c=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−H2n1+2n}=(1+y)ln(1+y)−2V(y),c=3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−Hn1+2n}=(1+y)ln(1+y)+(1+y)U(y),c=−3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−2On1+2n}=(1+y)ln(1+y)−(1+y)U(y)−4V(y). |
For the above four equations, first replacing U(y) and V(y) by their algebraic values in Lemma 11, and then putting the resulting equations in conjunction with that in Theorem 2, we establish, after some routine simplifications, four closed formulae as in the following theorem:
Theorem 12 (ρ<y<1/2).
(a)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=2√(1+y)3√yln(√y+√1+y)+2(1+y)√4+y√yln(√4+y−√y2),(b)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)H2n1+2n=2√(1+y)3√yln(√y+√1+y)−3+3y2ln(1−2y)+(1+y)√4+y2√yln(2+2y−2√y2+4y2−y(2+y−√y2+4y)),(c)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)On1+2n=2√(1+y)3√yln(√y+√1+y)−3+3y4ln(1−2y)+(1+y)√4+y2√yln(1+y−√y2+4y√1−2y),(d)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)H3n1+2n=2(1+y)+1+y2ln((1+y)2(1−2y)3)+(1+y)√4+y2√yln(2+2y−2√y2+4y2−y(2+y−√y2+4y)). |
By assigning particular values for y in Theorems 2 and 12, we can deduce numerous infinite series identities with different convergence rates. In order to show the variety of implications, we record five representative classes of infinite series values.
Corollary 13 (y→√5−2 in Theorems 2 and 12).
(a)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=2√2ln(3+√101+√2)−(3+√5)ln(1+√52),(b)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H2n1+2n=2√2ln(3+√101+√2)−(6−4√5)ln(1+√52)−√5ln5,(c)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)Hn1+2n=(5√5−3)ln(1+√52)−√5ln5,(d)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)On1+2n=2√2ln(3+√101+√2)−(92−3√52)ln(1+√52)−√52ln5,(e)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H3n1+2n=(√5−1)(2+ln2)−(5−3√5)ln(1+√52)−√5ln5. |
Corollary 14 (y→3√3−52 in Theorems 2 and 12).
(a)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=9+3√32ln(√3−1)+9√6ln(3+2√2√3+√2),(b)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H2n1+2n=92ln(3−√32)+3√32ln((√3+1)312√3)+9√6ln(3+2√2√3+√2),(c)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)Hn1+2n=94ln(34)+3√32ln((√3+1)424√3),(d)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)On1+2n=34(3−√3)ln(2√3−3)−9ln34√3+9√6ln(3+2√2√3+√2),(e)∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H3n1+2n=3√3−3+32ln(2√3−32)+3√32ln(2+√32√3). |
Corollary 15 (y→3√2−4 in Theorems 2 and 12).
(a)∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=3√3ln(√6−2√3−1)+9√2−√2√6ln(6√2−7+√6(2−√2)3),(b)∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)H2n1+2n=3√3ln(√3−1√2)−(9−9√2)ln(1+√2√3)+9√2−√2√6ln(6√2−7+√6(2−√2)3),(c)∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)Hn1+2n=3√3ln(√2+√32+√3)−(9−9√2)ln(1+√2√3),(d)∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)On1+2n=(92−9√2)ln(√6−√3)−3√32ln(√2+√3)+9√2−√2√6ln(6√2−7+√6(2−√2)3),(e)∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)H3n1+2n=6√2−6+3√3ln(√3−1√2)−(3−3√2)ln(3+2√2√3). |
Corollary 16 (y→15 in Theorems 2 and 12).
(a)∞∑n=1(25216)n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=12√65ln(1+√6√5)−12√215ln(1+√212√5),(b)∞∑n=1(25216)n(3nn)H2n1+2n=95ln(53)+12√65ln(1+√6√5)+6√215ln(9−√212√15),(c)∞∑n=1(25216)n(3nn)Hn1+2n=95ln(53)+3√215ln(257−13√21250),(d)∞∑n=1(25216)n(3nn)On1+2n=910ln(53)+12√65ln(1+√6√5)+3√215ln(6−√21√15),(e)∞∑n=1(25216)n(3nn)H3n1+2n=125+35ln(203)+6√215ln(9−√212√15). |
Corollary 17 (y→−110 in Theorems 2 and 12).
(a)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)ˉH2n1+2n=275arccot3−9√395arccot√39,(b)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)H2n1+2n=275arccot3−9√3920arccos(6780)−2720ln(65),(c)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)Hn1+2n=9√3920arccos(79878000)−2720ln(65),(d)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)On1+2n=275arccot3−9√3920arccos(√2740)−2740ln(65),(e)∞∑n=1(−100729)n(3nn)H3n1+2n=95−9√3920arccos(6780)−920ln(3215). |
Under the parameter replacements "a→6ax,c→2cx", Bailey's cubic transformation (4.1) can be reformulated alternatively as
∞∑n=0(y4(1+y)3)n(6ax)3nn!(1+3ax−cx)n(12+3ax+cx)n=(1+y)6ax×{1+12acx2∞∑k=1(−y4)k(1+6ax)k−1(1+2cx)k−1(1−2cx)kk!(1+3ax−cx)k(12+3ax+cx)k}. |
Both series in the above equation converge subject to the same condition "y∈(ρ,12)", or equivalently, 27y4(1+y)3∈(−1,1) (as before).
Equating the constant terms from both sides yields the algebraic identity below
∞∑n=1(3nn)ynn(1+y)3n=3ln(1+y). |
Instead, the coefficients of x result in the following infinite series identity involving a free variable "y" and two linear parameters a and c:
∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a−c)Hn−2(3a+c)Onn−2an2}=9aln2(1+y)+6c∞∑k=1(k−1)!k(12)k(−y4)k. |
Let U(y) and V(y) stand for the two series
U(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!k(12)k(−y4)kandV(y)=∞∑n=1ynn2(1+y)3n(3nn). |
They admit closed formulae as in the lemma below:
Lemma 18.
(a)U(y)=−2ln2(2√y+√4+y),−4<y<4;(b)V(y)=3{π26+lnyln(1+y)−2ln2(1+y)−Li2(11+y)},ρ<y<1/2. |
Proof. The first series U(y) can be reformulated as
U(y)=∞∑k=1(k−1)!k(12)k(−y4)k=∞∑k=1B(k,12)(−y4)k=∞∑k=1(−y/4)kk∫10xk−1dx√1−x=∫10dxx√1−x∞∑k=1(−xy/4)kk=−∫10ln(1+xy4)dxx√1−x=−∫10dTTln(1+(2+y)T+T2(1+T)2)x→4T(1+T)2=∫10dTT{2ln(1+T)−ln(1+4T(√y+√4+y)2)−ln(1+4T(√y−√4+y)2)}=π26+Li2(−4(√y+√4+y)2)+Li2(−4(√y−√4+y)2). |
Then the closed formula for U(y) in the lemma follows by applying the dilogarithmic equation
Li2(−x)+Li2(−x−1)=−π26−ln2x2,wherex>0. |
For the second series, we can rewrite it by reindexing n→n+1 as
V(y)=∞∑n=1ynn2(1+y)3n(3nn)=3y(1+y)3∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3n+2n)1(1+n)2. |
Now specializing Lambert's second series by "α=2 and β=3" and τ→xy/(1+y)3
∞∑n=0xnyn(1+y)3n(3n+2n)=(1+T)31−2T,wherex=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3, |
then integrating twice across this equation, we can proceed with
∞∑n=0yn(1+y)3n(3n+2n)1(1+n)2=∫10dtt∫t0(1+T)31−2Tdx=−∫10(1+T)3lnx1−2Tdx=−(1+y)3y∫y0dT1+Tln(T(1+y)3y(1+T)3)x=T(1+y)3y(1+T)3=−(1+y)3y{∫y0dT1+Tln(T(1+y)3y)−3∫y0ln(1+T)1+TdT}=(1+y)3y{π26+lnyln(1+y)−2ln2(1+y)−Li2(11+y)}. |
By substitution, the closed formula for V(y) in the lemma follows consequently.
Thus, we have the following reduced transformation:
∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){6aH3n−(3a−c)Hn−2(3a+c)Onn}=9aln2(1+y)+6cU(y)+2aV(y). | (5.1) |
By specifying two parameters, a and c, we deduce four independent series
a=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)ˉH2nn=−3U(y),c=0:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−H2nn}=32ln2(1+y)+V(y)3,c=3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−2Onn}=32ln2(1+y)+3U(y)+V(y)3,c=−3a:∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){H3n−Hnn}=32ln2(1+y)−3U(y)+V(y)3. |
For these four equations, replacing U(y) and V(y) first by their algebraic expressions and then relating the resulting equations to that in Theorem 3, we find, after some simplifications, four infinite series identities as below:
Theorem 19 (ρ<y<1/2). Letting Θ(y) be defined as in Theorem 3, the following algebraic identities hold:
(a)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)ˉH2nn=6ln2(2√y+√4+y),(b)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)H2nn=π22+3Θ(y)+3lnyln(1+y)−92ln2(1+y)+6ln2(2√y+√4+y),(c)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)Onn=π24+32Θ(y)+32lnyln(1+y)−94ln2(1+y)+6ln2(2√y+√4+y),(d)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn)H3nn=2π23+3Θ(y)+4lnyln(1+y)−5ln2(1+y)+6ln2(2√y+√4+y)−Li2(11+y). |
By assigning five particular values for y in Theorems 3 and 19, five classes of infinite series identities are displayed in the following corollaries:
Corollary 20 (y→√5−2 in Theorems 3 and 19).
(a) ∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)ˉH2nn=32ln2(1+√52),(b) ∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H2nn=π22+32ln22+3Θ(√5−2)+6ln(1+√5)ln(1+√54),(c) ∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)Hnn=π22+3Θ(√5−2)+92ln(1+√5)ln(1+√54),(d) ∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)Onn=π24+32ln22+32Θ(√5−2)+154ln(1+√5)ln(1+√54),(e)∞∑n=1(18)n(3nn)H3nn=2π23+112ln22+3Θ(√5−2)+ln(1+√5)2ln((1+√5)17238)−Li2(1+√54). |
Corollary 21 (y→√5−2√5 in Theorems 3 and 19).
(a) ∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)ˉH2nn=32ln2(5+√510),(b) ∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)H2nn=π22+3Θ(√5−2√5)+32ln(5+√58)ln(64+128√5)+32ln2(5+√510),(c) ∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)Hnn=π22+3Θ(√5−2√5)+32ln(5+√58)ln(64+128√5),(d) ∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)Onn=π24+32Θ(√5−2√5)+34ln(5+√58)ln(64+128√5)+32ln2(5+√510),(e) ∞∑n=1(564)n(3nn)H3nn=2π23+3Θ(√5−2√5)−Li2(5+√58)+32ln2(5+√510)+ln(5+√58)ln(8(5+√5)754). |
Corollary 22 (y→13 in Theorems 3 and 19).
(a)∞∑n=1(964)n(3nn)ˉH2nn=32ln2(7+√136),(b) ∞∑n=1(964)n(3nn)H2nn=π22−32ln(43)ln(643)+3Θ(13)+32ln2(7+√136),(c) ∞∑n=1(964)n(3nn)Hnn=π22−32ln(43)ln(643)+3Θ(13),(d) ∞∑n=1(964)n(3nn)Onn=π24−34ln(43)ln(643)+32Θ(13)+32ln2(7+√136),(e) ∞∑n=1(964)n(3nn)H3nn=2π23−ln(43)ln(10243)+3Θ(13)−Li2(34)+32ln2(7+√136). |
Corollary 23 (y→3√3−52 in Theorems 3 and 19).
(a) ∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)ˉH2nn=32ln2(√3−1),(b) ∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H2nn=π22+32ln(54)ln(23)+6ln(1+√3)ln(1+√32)+3Θ(3√3−53),(c) ∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)Hnn=π22+32ln(1+√33)ln(27(1+√3)34)+3Θ(3√3−53),(d) ∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)Onn=π24+34ln(1+√32)ln((1+√3)52)+34ln(54)ln(23)+32Θ(3√3−53),(e) ∞∑n=1(227)n(3nn)H3nn=2π23+32ln2(1+√32)−Li2(1+√33)+3Θ(3√3−53)+ln(1+√33)ln(35(1+√3)724). |
Corollary 24 (y→3√2−4 in Theorems 3 and 19).
(a) ∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)ˉH2nn=32ln2(1+√32+√6),(b) ∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)H2nn=π22+3Θ(3√2−4)+32ln2(1+√32+√6)+32ln(1+√23)ln(27(1+√2)2),(c) ∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)Hnn=π22+3Θ(3√2−4)+32ln(1+√23)ln(27(1+√2)2),(d) ∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)Onn=π24+32Θ(3√2−4)+32ln2(1+√32+√6)+34ln(1+√23)ln(27(1+√2)2),(e) ∞∑n=1(2+√227)n(3nn)H3nn=2π23+3Θ(3√2−4)+32ln2(1+√32+√6)−Li2(1+√23)+ln(1+√23)ln(35(1+√2)34). |
By integrating Lambert's series and manipulating the cubic transformations for 3F2-series through the "coefficient extraction method", we have shown several algebraic formulae for infinite series containing binomial coefficient (3nn), harmonic-like numbers, and in particular, a free variable "y". As showcases, three classes of infinite series were examined in detail from Sections 3–5. More variants of these series exist and can be treated analogously. For instance, the transformation formula (3.1) under the replacements "a→1+6ax,c→2cx" becomes
3F2[1+2ax,23+2ax,43+2ax1+3ax+cx,32+3ax−cx|27y4(1+y)3]=(1+y)2+6ax1−2y×4F3[43+2ax,1+6ax,2cx,1−2cx13+2ax,1+3ax+cx,32+3ax−cx|−y4]. |
Then by carrying out the same procedure as in the preceding sections, we can establish the algebraic identities for five infinite series, as in the theorem below:
Theorem 25 (ρ<y<1/2). Letting Λ(y) be the function defined by
Λ(y)=3ln(1−2y)+2−y√y2+4yln(2−y(2+y+√y2+4y)2−y(2+y−√y2+4y)), |
we have the closed algebraic formulae for five infinite series:
(a) ∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3n+1n)ˉH2n+1=2(y−2)(1+y)2(1−2y)√y2+4yln√4+y−√y2,(b) ∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3n+1n)H2n+1=(1+y)21−2y{2y−4√y2+4yln√4+y−√y2−Λ(y)2},(c) ∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3n+1n)Hn=(1+y)24y−2Λ(y),(d) ∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3n+1n)On+1=(1+y)21−2y{2y−4√y2+4yln√4+y−√y2−Λ(y)4},(e) ∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3n+1n)H3n+1=(1+y)21−2y{2y−4√y2+4yln√4+y−√y2−Λ(y)2+ln(1+y)}. |
From the algebraic identities exhibited for the series with harmonic-like numbers of the first order, it is natural to ask: what would happen for the corresponding series involving harmonic-like numbers of the second order? Our computations manifested that the resulting expressions are very complex and convoluted, which can be exemplified by the following attempt made by the authors. Extracting the coefficient of x2 across (3.2), we can derive, after a number of reductions and simplifications, the following formulae:
(a)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){ˉH22n+H⟨2⟩2n}=6y+62y−1{U(y)+W(y)},(b)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){(H3n−H2n)2+H⟨2⟩2n−H⟨2⟩3n}=1+y1−2yln2(1+y),(c)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){(2On−H3n)2+4O⟨2⟩n−H⟨2⟩3n}=1+y1−2y{ln2(1+y)+6ln(1+y)W(y)−10U(y)−12W(y)},(d)∞∑n=1yn(1+y)3n(3nn){(Hn−H3n)2+H⟨2⟩n−H⟨2⟩3n}=1+y1−2y{ln2(1+y)−6ln(1+y)W(y)−2U(y)}; |
where \mathrm{W}(y)\;\; and\;\; \mathcal{{U}}(y) are as in Lemmas 4 and 18, respectively, and \mathcal{{W}}(y) is given by
\begin{aligned} \mathscr{W}(y) & =\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(k-1)!}{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)_k}\left(\frac{-y}{4}\right)^k \overline{\mathbf{H}}_{2 k} \\ & =\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{y}{4+y}}\right) \ln ^2\left(\frac{\sqrt{4+y}+\sqrt{y}}{2}\right)-\sqrt{\frac{y}{4+y}} \operatorname{Li}_2\left(\frac{2 \sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}+\sqrt{4+y}}\right). \end{aligned} |
There are altogether nine harmonic-like numbers appearing in the above four series
\Big\{ \mathbf{H}_{{n}}^{{2}}, \mathbf{O}_{{n}}^{{2}}, \mathbf{H}_{{3n}}^{{2}};\; \mathbf{H}_{{n}}^{ \langle{{{2}}}\rangle}, \mathbf{O}_{{n}}^{ \langle{{{2}}}\rangle}, \mathbf{H}_{{3n}}^{ \langle{{{2}}}\rangle};\; \mathbf{H}_{{n}} \mathbf{O}_{{n}}, \mathbf{H}_{{n}} \mathbf{H}_{{3n}}, \mathbf{H}_{{3n}} \mathbf{O}_{{n}}\Big\}. |
To evaluate the nine corresponding independent "nuclear series", it is necessary to find five similar independent equations. It seems quite a tough problem that the authors failed to arrive at solutions, even though we did succeed in determining the following long and ugly expression involving six terms in dilogarithms (that prevents us from making further simplifications). Perhaps the only value of this formula lies in its existence.
\begin{align*} \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty} \binom{3n}{n}\frac{ \mathbf{H}_{{n}}^{ \langle{{{2}}}\rangle}\; y^n}{(1+y)^{3n}} & = \int_0^y\frac{3(1+y)^3\ln\Big(\frac{T(1+y)^3}{y(1+T)^3}\Big)\; dT} {(1-2y)(1+T)(T^2y+Ty^2+3Ty-1)}\\ & = \frac{\pi ^2 (1+y)}{2 (1-2 y)} +\frac{3 (1+y) \ln^2(1+y)}{1-2 y} +\frac{3 (1+y) \ln y \ln(1+y)}{1-2 y}\\ &-\frac{3 (1+y)}{1-2 y} \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{1}{1+y}\Big) +\frac{9 (1+y)}{1-2 y}\sqrt{\frac{y}{4+y}} \ln(1+y) \ln\Big(\frac{2+y+ \sqrt{4y+y^2}}{2}\Big)\\ &+\frac{3 (1+y)}{2 (1-2 y)} \Big(1+\sqrt{\frac{y}{4+y}}\Big) \Bigg\{3 \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2\sqrt{y}}{(1+y) (\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{4+y})}\Big) -3 \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2 \sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{4+y}}\Big) + \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2 y^{3/2}}{\sqrt{y}(3+y)-(1+y) \sqrt{4+y}}\Big)\Bigg\} \\ &+\frac{3 (1+y)}{2 (1-2 y)} \Big(1-\sqrt{\frac{y}{4+y}}\Big) \Bigg\{3 \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2 \sqrt{y}}{(1+y) (\sqrt{y}+\sqrt{4+y})}\Big) -3 \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2 \sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}+\sqrt{4+y}}\Big) + \mathrm{Li}_2\Big(\frac{-2 y^{3/2}}{\sqrt{y}(3+y)+(1+y) \sqrt{4+y}}\Big)\Bigg\} . \end{align*} |
Therefore, to evaluate the series containing binomial coefficient \binom{3n}{n} and harmonic-like numbers of the second and/or higher orders, one needs to find out different approaches. The interested readers are enthusiastically encouraged to make further explorations.
C. Li: Writing, computation and review; W. Chu: Methodology and supervision. Both of authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence tools in the creation of this article.
The authors express their gratitude to anonymous referees for their careful reading, critical comments and valuable suggestions that make the manuscript improved substantially during the revision.
Prof. Wenchang Chu is the Guest Editor of special issue "Combinatorial Analysis and Mathematical Constants" for AIMS Mathematics. Prof. Wenchang Chu was not involved in the editorial review and the decision to publish this article. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
M. Hartmann, S. Kullmann, H. Keller, Wastewater treatment with heterogeneous Fenton-type catalysts based on porous materials, J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010), 9002–9017. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM00577K doi: 10.1039/C0JM00577K
![]() |
[2] |
F. A. Montalto, T. S. Steenhuis, J. Y. Parlange, The hydrology of Piermont Marsh, a reference for tidal marsh restoration in the Hudson river estuary, New York, J. Hydrol., 316 (2006), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.043 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.043
![]() |
[3] |
E. A. Sudicky, P. S. Huyakorn, Contaminant migration in imperfectly known heterogeneous groundwater systems, Rev. Geophys., 29 (1991), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/rog.1991.29.s1.240 doi: 10.1002/rog.1991.29.s1.240
![]() |
[4] |
S. E. Serrano, Analytical solutions of the nonlinear groundwater flow equation in unconfined aquifers and the effect of heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 31 (1995), 2733–2742. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02038 doi: 10.1029/95WR02038
![]() |
[5] |
J. Cao, P. K. Kitanidis, Adaptive-grid simulation of groundwater flow in heterogeneous aquifers, Adv. Water Resour., 22 (1999), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00047-5 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00047-5
![]() |
[6] |
T. Scheibe, S. Yabusaki, Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems, Adv. Water Resour., 22 (1998), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00014-1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00014-1
![]() |
[7] |
C. L. Winter, D. M. Tartakovsky, Groundwater flow in heterogeneous composite aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 38 (2002), 23-1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000450 doi: 10.1029/2001WR000450
![]() |
[8] |
C. W. Beckwith, A. J. Baird, A. L. Heathwaite, Anisotropy and depth‐related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a bog peat. Ⅱ: modelling the effects on groundwater flow, Hydrol. Process., 17 (2003), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1116 doi: 10.1002/hyp.1116
![]() |
[9] |
K. Hemker, M. Bakker, Analytical solutions for whirling groundwater flow in two-dimensional heterogeneous anisotropic aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 42 (2006), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004901 doi: 10.1029/2006WR004901
![]() |
[10] |
M. Fahs, T. Graf, T. V. Tran, B. Ataie-Ashtiani, C. T. Simmons, A. Younes, Study of the effect of thermal dispersion on internal natural convection in porous media using Fourier series, Transport Porous Med., 131 (2000), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-019-01356-1 doi: 10.1007/s11242-019-01356-1
![]() |
[11] |
K. Srivastava, S. E. Serrano, Uncertainty analysis of linear and nonlinear groundwater flow in a heterogeneous aquifer, J. Hydrol. Eng., 12 (2007), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:3(306) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:3(306)
![]() |
[12] |
S. K. Das, S. Jai Ganesh, T. S. Lundström, Modeling of a groundwater mound in a two-dimensional heterogeneous unconfined aquifer in response to precipitation recharge, J. Hydrol. Eng., 20 (2015), 04014081-1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001071 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001071
![]() |
[13] |
M. C. Wu, P. C. Hsieh, Improved solutions to the linearized Boussinesq equation with temporally varied rainfall recharge for a sloping aquifer, Water, 11 (2019), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040826 doi: 10.3390/w11040826
![]() |
[14] |
K. N. Moutsopoulos, J. N. Papaspyros, M. Fahs, Approximate solutions for flows in unconfined double porosity aquifers, J. Hydrol., (2022), 615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128679 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128679
![]() |
[15] |
N. Samani, M. M. Sedghi, Semi-analytical solutions of groundwater flow in multi-zone (patchy) wedge-shaped aquifers, Adv. Water Resour., 77 (2015), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.003
![]() |
[16] |
X. Liang, Y. K. Zhang, K. Schilling, Effect of heterogeneity on spatiotemporal variations of groundwater level in a bounded unconfined aquifer, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 30 (2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0990-4 doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0990-4
![]() |
[17] |
X. Liang, H. Zhan, K. Schilling, Spatiotemporal responses of groundwater flow and aquifer‐river exchanges to flood events, Water Resour. Res., 54 (2018), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022046 doi: 10.1002/2017WR022046
![]() |
[18] |
J. F. Águila, J. Samper, B. Pisani, Parametric and numerical analysis of the estimation of groundwater recharge from water-table fluctuations in heterogeneous unconfined aquifers, Hydrogeol. J., 27 (2019), 1309–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1908-x doi: 10.1007/s10040-018-1908-x
![]() |
[19] |
E. Akylas, A. D. Koussis, Response of sloping unconfined aquifer to stage changes in adjacent stream. Ⅰ. Theoretical analysis and derivation of system response functions, J. Hydrol., 338 (2007), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.021
![]() |
[20] |
A. D. Koussis, E. Akylas, K. Mazi, Response of sloping unconfined aquifer to stage changes in adjacent stream: Ⅱ. Applications, J. Hydrol., 338 (2007), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.030 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.030
![]() |
[21] |
M. C. Wu, P. C. Hsieh, Variation of groundwater flow caused by any spatiotemporally varied recharge, Water, 12 (2020), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010287 doi: 10.3390/w12010287
![]() |
[22] |
J. Zhang, X. Liang, Y. K. Zhang, X. Chen, E. Ma, K. Schilling, Groundwater responses to recharge and flood in riparian zones of layered aquifers: An analytical model, J. Hydrol., (2022), 614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128547 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128547
![]() |
[23] |
W. Brutsaert, The unit response of groundwater outflow from a hillslope, Water Resour. Res., 30 (1994), 2759–2763. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01396 doi: 10.1029/94WR01396
![]() |
[24] |
M. A. Marino, Water-table fluctuation in semipervious stream-unconfined aquifer systems, J. Hydrol., 19 (1973), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(73)90092-9 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(73)90092-9
![]() |
1. | Chunli Li, Wenchang Chu, Generating Functions for Binomial Series Involving Harmonic-like Numbers, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2685, 10.3390/math12172685 | |
2. | Artūras Dubickas, On the Range of Arithmetic Means of the Fractional Parts of Harmonic Numbers, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3731, 10.3390/math12233731 |