Search Advanced

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2020, Volume 17, Issue 6: 6699-6701. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020348
Previous Article Next Article
Correction

Correction: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis

  • National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on ATR, College of Electronic Science, National University of Defence Technology, Changsha 410000, China
  • Received: 27 September 2020 Accepted: 28 September 2020 Published: 28 September 2020

  • Citation: Fankang Bu, Jun He, Haorun Li, Qiang Fu. Correction: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 6699-6701. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020348

    Related Papers:

    [1] Fankang Bu, Jun He, Haorun Li, Qiang Fu . Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5584-5603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020300
    [2] Yefu Zheng, Jun Xu, Hongzhang Chen . TOPSIS-based entropy measure for intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy sets and application to multi-attribute decision making. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5604-5617. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020301
    [3] Yongfeng Yin, Routing Zhang, Qingran Su . Threat assessment of aerial targets based on improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 13250-13266. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023591
    [4] Han Wu, Junwu Wang, Sen Liu, Tingyou Yang . Research on decision-making of emergency plan for waterlogging disaster in subway station project based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4825-4851. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020263
    [5] Qiwen Wang, Guibao Song, Xiuxia Yang . Mixed-attitude three-way decision model for aerial targets: Threat assessment based on IF-VIKOR-GRA method. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 21514-21536. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023952
    [6] Bo Sun, Ming Wei, Wei Wu, Binbin Jing . A novel group decision making method for airport operational risk management. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2402-2417. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020130
    [7] Muhammad Akram, G. Muhiuddin, Gustavo Santos-García . An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 7201-7231. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022340
    [8] Haiping Ren, Laijun Luo . A novel distance of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its-based prospect theory algorithm in multi-attribute decision making model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 2905-2922. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020163
    [9] Muhammad Bilal Khan, Hari Mohan Srivastava, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Juan L. G. Guirao, Taghreed M. Jawa . Fuzzy-interval inequalities for generalized preinvex fuzzy interval valued functions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 812-835. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022037
    [10] Muhammad Bilal Khan, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khadijah M. Abualnaja . Fuzzy integral inequalities on coordinates of convex fuzzy interval-valued functions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6552-6580. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021325


  • A correction on

    Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis

    by Fankang Bu, Jun He, Haorun Li and Qiang Fu. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17 (5): 5584–5603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020300.

    We would like to submit the following corrections to our recently published paper 1 due to the wrong calculation of the manuscript. The details are the following.

    1. The Table 3 has been updated.

    Table 3.  Weights of attributes.
    Attributes weights Attributes
    T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
    Subjective weight 0.183 0.212 0.145 0.191 0.108 0.161
    Entropy weight 0.116 0.115 0.219 0.152 0.217 0.180
    Combined weight 0.15 0.16 0.183 0.175 0.157 0.175
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    2. The Figure 3 has been updated.

    Figure 3.  The comparative analysis results of weights.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    3. The Table 4 has been updated.

    Table 4.  Weighted Euclidean distances and weighted grey correlation degrees.
    Alternative Distance Grey related degree
    di+ di− ξi+ ξi−
    A1 0.090 0.094 0.780 0.575
    A2 0.099 0.085 0.741 0.637
    A3 0.108 0.083 0.727 0.683
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    4. The Table 5 has been updated.

    Table 5.  Normalized treatment to weighted Euclidean distances and weighted grey correlation degrees.
    Alternative Distance Grey related degree
    Di+ Di− Ei+ Ei−
    A1 0.833 1.000 1.000 0.842
    A2 0.917 0.904 0.950 0.933
    A3 1.000 0.883 0.932 1.000
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    5. The Table 6 has been updated.

    Table 6.  Combination closeness degree and Rank.
    Alternatives Vi+ Vi− Zi Rank
    A1 1.000 0.838 0.544 1
    A2 0.927 0.910 0.500 2
    A3 0.908 1.000 0.476 3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    6. The Figure 4 has been updated.

    Figure 4.  Sensitivity analysis for preference coefficient.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    7. The Table 7 has been updated.

    Table 7.  The ranking results of three methods.
    Alternative TOPSIS-GCA DIF-MADM IIHA
    value rank value rank value rank
    A1 0.544 1 0.569 1 0.081 1
    A2 0.500 2 0.544 2 −0.023 2
    A3 0.476 3 0.427 3 −0.071 3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    These changes have no material impact on the conclusion of this paper. The manuscript will be updated. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to our readers.



    [1] F. K. Bu, J. He, H. R. Li, Q. Fu, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 5584-5603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020300

  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xiaoyun Chen, Zhe Xue, Wen-Tsao Pan, Performance Evaluation of Online Recruitment Enterprises Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS, 2022, 2022, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2022/8526826
    2. Hui Teng, Syed Hassan Ahmed, Construction and Drug Evaluation Based on Convolutional Neural Network System Optimized by Grey Correlation Analysis, 2021, 2021, 1687-5273, 1, 10.1155/2021/2794588
    3. Guanghua Wu, Hongsheng Li, Hongyu Li, Shiping Guo, Wenjian Ma, Jing Dong, Design of optimal power supply parameters for industrial expansion, 2023, 44, 10641246, 3751, 10.3233/JIFS-222926
    4. Dongmei Li, Lehua Yang, Shaojun Liu, Ruipu Tan, Multi-attribute decision making for deep learning-based typhoon disaster assessment, 2024, 46, 10641246, 6657, 10.3233/JIFS-235315
    5. Qi Zhenying, Kang Jiaqi, You Changjiang, The Evolution of Resilience and the Obstacles Facing the Tourism Socio-Ecological System (TSES) in Hainan Province, 2024, 15, 1674-764X, 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2024.01.006
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
4.4

Metrics

Article views(3523) PDF downloads(65) Cited by(5)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline
References

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Copyright © AIMS Press

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog