Terrestrial ecosystems represent some of the most extensive and human-influenced systems on Earth, playing a fundamental role in maintaining biodiversity, regulating ecological processes, and providing vital services to human societies. Assessing biodiversity and ecosystem services in terrestrial habitats is essential for understanding ecological dynamics, supporting conservation, and informing sustainable land-use policies. In this paper, we explored the theoretical underpinnings of biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships, reviewed methodological approaches for mapping and assessment, and presented selected case studies from Europe, South America, and Asia. The case studies highlighted the use of integrated frameworks such as the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES), expert-based ecosystem service supply matrices, and spatial modeling techniques. By examining how biodiversity loss and land-use changes affect service delivery, we demonstrated the importance of linking ecological knowledge with socioeconomic needs. We argue that advancing interdisciplinary, spatially explicit approaches to ecosystem assessment is critical for addressing global challenges such as climate change, habitat degradation, and sustainable development.
Citation: George Malaperdas. Biodiversity and ecosystem service assessment in terrestrial habitats[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2025, 3(4): 293-305. doi: 10.3934/urs.2025015
Terrestrial ecosystems represent some of the most extensive and human-influenced systems on Earth, playing a fundamental role in maintaining biodiversity, regulating ecological processes, and providing vital services to human societies. Assessing biodiversity and ecosystem services in terrestrial habitats is essential for understanding ecological dynamics, supporting conservation, and informing sustainable land-use policies. In this paper, we explored the theoretical underpinnings of biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships, reviewed methodological approaches for mapping and assessment, and presented selected case studies from Europe, South America, and Asia. The case studies highlighted the use of integrated frameworks such as the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES), expert-based ecosystem service supply matrices, and spatial modeling techniques. By examining how biodiversity loss and land-use changes affect service delivery, we demonstrated the importance of linking ecological knowledge with socioeconomic needs. We argue that advancing interdisciplinary, spatially explicit approaches to ecosystem assessment is critical for addressing global challenges such as climate change, habitat degradation, and sustainable development.
| [1] |
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, et al. (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772 doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
|
| [2] | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Washington, DC: Island Press. |
| [3] |
Ellis EC (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Phil Trans R Soc A 369: 1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0331
|
| [4] | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022) Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group Ⅱ Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844 |
| [5] |
Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, et al. (2019) Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366: eaax3100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 doi: 10.1126/science.aax3100
|
| [6] |
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, et al. (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148 doi: 10.1038/nature11148
|
| [7] | Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, et al. (2014) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2779/75203 |
| [8] | Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673 |
| [9] |
Schröter M, Remme RP, Sumarga E, et al. (2015) Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting. Ecosyst Serv 13: 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003
|
| [10] |
Hajjar R, Jarvis DI, Gemmill-Herren B (2008) The utility of crop genetic diversity in maintaining ecosystem service. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123: 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.003
|
| [11] |
Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, et al. (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339: 1608–1611. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230200 doi: 10.1126/science.1230200
|
| [12] |
Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW (2007) Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 16812–16816. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.262413599 doi: 10.1073/pnas.262413599
|
| [13] |
Hooper DU, Chapin Ⅲ FS, Ewel JJ, et al. (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0922 doi: 10.1890/04-0922
|
| [14] |
Isbell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, et al. (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477: 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10282 doi: 10.1038/nature10282
|
| [15] |
Mori AS, Furukawa T, Sasaki T (2013) Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol Rev 88: 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12004 doi: 10.1111/brv.12004
|
| [16] | Malaperdas G (2019) The influence and impact of bioclimatic indicators on the evolution of biosociety. A geoarchaeological approach. World News Nat Sci 24: 183–198. |
| [17] |
Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
|
| [18] | Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being, In: Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, Cambridge University Press, 110–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007 |
| [19] |
Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 doi: 10.1038/387253a0
|
| [20] |
De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. (2012) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity 7: 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
|
| [21] |
Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
|
| [22] |
Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025 doi: 10.1890/080025
|
| [23] |
Malaperdas G, Maggidis C, Karantzali E, et al. (2023) Field surveying, geostatistical and GIS methods in archaeology. The Mycenaean Spercheios-Valley Project (MY. SPE. AR. Project 2018–2022). Open Access J Arch Anthropol 4: 2023. http://doi.org/10.33552/OAJAA.2023.04.000600 doi: 10.33552/OAJAA.2023.04.000600
|
| [24] |
Turner W, Spector S, Gardiner N, et al. (2015) Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3
|
| [25] | Magurran AE (2013) Measuring Biological Diversity, Wiley-Blackwell. |
| [26] |
Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48: 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x
|
| [27] | Sharp R, Douglass J, Wolny S, et al. (2020) InVEST User Guide. Available from: https://storage.googleapis.com/releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest/3.9.0/userguide/index.html. |
| [28] |
Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, et al. (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS One 9: e91001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
|
| [29] |
Zulian G, Maes J, Paracchini ML (2013) Linking land cover data and crop yields for mapping and assessment of pollination services in Europe. Land 2: 472–292. https://doi.org/10.3390/land2030472 doi: 10.3390/land2030472
|
| [30] |
Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ (2011) A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr 31: 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002
|
| [31] | Mulligan M, Burke SM, Sanz-Cruz L, et al. (2010) A review of methods and tools for modelling freshwater services flows. Rep Conserv Int. |
| [32] | Botella C, Joly A, Bonnet P, et al. (2018) A deep learning approach to species distribution modelling, In: Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental and Biodiversity Informatics, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76445-0_10 |
| [33] |
Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 8: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 doi: 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
|
| [34] | Fearnside P (2017) Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon, In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.102 |
| [35] |
Pandit R, Dhakal M, Polyakov M (2015) Valuing access to protected areas in Nepal: The case of Chitwan National Park. Tour Manage 50: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.12.017
|
George Malaperdas. Biodiversity and ecosystem service assessment in terrestrial habitats[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2025, 3(4): 293-305. doi: 10.3934/urs.2025015
DownLoad: