Research article Special Issues

Empowering STEM educators in cross-cultural higher education contexts: professional development strategies for sustainable workforce readiness

  • Received: 20 April 2025 Revised: 09 May 2025 Accepted: 26 May 2025 Published: 06 August 2025
  • In the context of the internationalization of higher education, the development of STEM education increasingly relies on teachers' adaptability and professional competence in cross-cultural environments. This study aimed to empower STEM educators in cross-cultural settings and improve the sustainability of teachers' professional development (PD) by exploring how STEM teachers in Sino-Overseas Joint Education Programs (SOJEPs) experience PD within multicultural teaching contexts, exploring their integration of local educational needs with international pedagogical frameworks to enable sustainable teaching transformation. Grounded in Guskey's PD model and Hofstede's cultural theory, this qualitative study adopted grounded theory analysis for data collected by semi-structured interviews, institutional documents, and classroom observations from six STEM teachers in SOJEPs at an internationalized Chinese university. The findings reveal that STEM teachers in SOJEPs encounter challenges such as language barriers, pedagogical conflicts, and limited intercultural sensitivity. Although most teachers engage positively in PD activities, the transformation of training into classroom practice is hindered by factors like institutional constraints and student learning cultures. However, some teachers develop effective strategies, such as bilingual project-based learning, curriculum standard integration, and reflective teaching practices, demonstrating their evolving roles as cultural mediators and curriculum co-designers. A conceptual model—the Teacher Cross-Cultural Growth Pathway—is proposed to illustrate the dynamic process between PD engagement and cross-cultural adaptation. The study underscores that effective PD must be context-sensitive, culturally responsive, and career-oriented to truly support pedagogical transformation in SOJEPs, calling for the construction of integrated support systems that link PD to sustainable cross-cultural teaching, global competence, and employment outcomes.

    Citation: Cuiyun Wang, C. H. Norlizah, Mokhtar Muhamad, Shuran Zhang. Empowering STEM educators in cross-cultural higher education contexts: professional development strategies for sustainable workforce readiness[J]. STEM Education, 2025, 5(5): 954-973. doi: 10.3934/steme.2025042

    Related Papers:

  • In the context of the internationalization of higher education, the development of STEM education increasingly relies on teachers' adaptability and professional competence in cross-cultural environments. This study aimed to empower STEM educators in cross-cultural settings and improve the sustainability of teachers' professional development (PD) by exploring how STEM teachers in Sino-Overseas Joint Education Programs (SOJEPs) experience PD within multicultural teaching contexts, exploring their integration of local educational needs with international pedagogical frameworks to enable sustainable teaching transformation. Grounded in Guskey's PD model and Hofstede's cultural theory, this qualitative study adopted grounded theory analysis for data collected by semi-structured interviews, institutional documents, and classroom observations from six STEM teachers in SOJEPs at an internationalized Chinese university. The findings reveal that STEM teachers in SOJEPs encounter challenges such as language barriers, pedagogical conflicts, and limited intercultural sensitivity. Although most teachers engage positively in PD activities, the transformation of training into classroom practice is hindered by factors like institutional constraints and student learning cultures. However, some teachers develop effective strategies, such as bilingual project-based learning, curriculum standard integration, and reflective teaching practices, demonstrating their evolving roles as cultural mediators and curriculum co-designers. A conceptual model—the Teacher Cross-Cultural Growth Pathway—is proposed to illustrate the dynamic process between PD engagement and cross-cultural adaptation. The study underscores that effective PD must be context-sensitive, culturally responsive, and career-oriented to truly support pedagogical transformation in SOJEPs, calling for the construction of integrated support systems that link PD to sustainable cross-cultural teaching, global competence, and employment outcomes.



    加载中


    [1] UNESCO, Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2017.
    [2] Bybee, R.W., Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 2010, 70(1): 30–35.
    [3] Marginson, S., Rhoades, G. and van der Wende, M., Global higher education in the 21st century: The role of governments and markets. Higher Education Policy, 2013, 26(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.25 doi: 10.1057/hep.2012.25
    [4] Chen, S. and Lo, Y.Y., Internationalization of Chinese higher education: Retrospect and prospect. Higher Education Quarterly, 2019, 73(4): 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12209 doi: 10.1111/hequ.12209
    [5] Yang, R., China's higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Some preliminary observations. Higher Education Research & Development, 2020, 39(7): 1317–1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1824212 doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1824212
    [6] Welch, A., Global ambitions: Internationalization and China's rise as knowledge hub. Frontiers of Education in China, 2018, 13(4): 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-018-0028-7 doi: 10.1007/s11516-018-0028-7
    [7] Leask, B., Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2009, 13(2): 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329786 doi: 10.1177/1028315308329786
    [8] Phuong-Mai, N., Terlouw, C. and Pilot, A., Cooperative learning vs. Confucian heritage culture's collectivism: Confrontation or compatibility? Comparative Education, 2005, 41(1): 31–50.
    [9] Wang, Y. and Tang, H., Cross-cultural pedagogy in STEM: Integrating local and global teaching practices. Journal of International Education Research, 2022, 18(3): 45–60.
    [10] Tran, L.T. and Pham, L., Intercultural teaching in global STEM programs: Challenges and pedagogical shifts. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2021, 22(4): 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09678-9 doi: 10.1007/s12564-021-09678-9
    [11] Tian, M. and Lowe, J., Intercultural identity and intercultural competence as indicators of internationalisation: A case of Chinese students at a UK university. International Journal of Educational Research, 2018, 88: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.002
    [12] Tran, L.T. and Dempsey, K., Internationalisation in vocational education and training: Transnational perspectives, Springer, 2017.
    [13] Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E. and Gardner, M., Effective teacher professional development, Learning Policy Institute, 2017.
    [14] OECD, Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework, OECD Publishing, 2018.
    [15] Guskey, T.R., Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 2002, 59(6): 45–51.
    [16] Villegas, A.M. and Lucas, T., The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership, 2007, 64(6): 28–33.
    [17] Lee, J.T. and Sehoole, C., Regional, continental and global mobility into and out of Africa: An analysis of selected student and academic trajectories. Comparative Education, 2015, 51(1): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2014.935580
    [18] Tran, L.T. and Nguyen, N.T., Intercultural teaching capacity: A conceptualization and development framework for internationalizing teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, 73: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.009 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.009
    [19] Beers, S.Z., 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future. STEM Education Coalition, 2011.
    [20] National Research Council, A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas, National Academies Press, 2012.
    [21] Mochizuki, Y. and Bryan, A., Climate change education in the context of education for sustainable development: Rationale and principles. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2015, 9(1): 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408215569109 doi: 10.1177/0973408215569109
    [22] Bascopé, M., Perasso, P. and Reiss, K., Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 2019, 11(3): 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719 doi: 10.3390/su11030719
    [23] Hargreaves, A., The coming of post-standardization: Three weddings and a funeral. International Journal of Educational Research, 2008, 47(6): 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.11.007
    [24] Wiek, A., Withycombe, L. and Redman, C.L., Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 2011, 6(2): 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6 doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
    [25] Brundiers, K., Wiek, A. and Redman, C.L., Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2010, 11(4): 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011077540 doi: 10.1108/14676371011077540
    [26] Rieckmann, M., Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 2012, 44(2): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005
    [27] Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D. and Berglund, T., The effectiveness of education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 2015, 21(7): 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.983581 doi: 10.1080/13504622.2014.983581
    [28] Evans, N., Stevenson, R.B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J.A. and Davis, J.M., Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 63: 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013
    [29] Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., McKeown, R. and Hopkins, C., Contributions of education for sustainable development (ESD) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2016, 10(2): 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442 doi: 10.1177/0973408216661442
    [30] Avalos, B., Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011, 27(1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
    [31] Desimone, L.M., Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 2009, 38(3): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140
    [32] Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. and Fung, I., Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration, New Zealand Ministry of Education, 2007.
    [33] Kennedy, A., Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 2014, 40(5): 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122 doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
    [34] Villegas-Reimers, E., Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature, UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning, 2003.
    [35] Opfer, V.D. and Pedder, D., Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 2011, 81(3): 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609 doi: 10.3102/0034654311413609
    [36] Vescio, V., Ross, D. and Adams, A., A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2008, 24(1): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
    [37] Loh, C.E. and Tee, M.Y., Making professional development culturally relevant: Lessons from cross-cultural teacher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 2020, 48(1): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1653814 doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2019.1653814
    [38] Gay, G., Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.), Teachers College Press, 2010.
    [39] Lim, C.P. and Tan, M., Fostering teachers' capacity for adaptive change: Professional development for 21st-century teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2018, 38(2): 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460258 doi: 10.1080/02188791.2018.1460258
    [40] Schleicher, A., Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform: Lessons from around the world, OECD Publishing, 2016.
    [41] Walker, G., Internationalization and teacher development in higher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2017, 15(4): 506–517
    [42] Borko, H., Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 2004, 33(8): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003 doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
    [43] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Statistics on Sino-Foreign Cooperative Education Institutions and Programs (as of February 2025). Retrieved from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/
    [44] Li, Z. and Wu, C., Research on the quality assurance system of Sino-foreign cooperative education. China Higher Education Research, 2020, (4): 54–59. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1004-3667.2020.04.010 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-3667.2020.04.010
    [45] Mok, K.H., Transnational higher education and international student mobility in China: Beyond the pandemic. Journal of Education and Work, 2020, 33(5-6): 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1829059 doi: 10.1080/13639080.2020.1829059
    [46] Qin, Y. and Teo, P., Sino-foreign cooperative education in the post-pandemic era: Challenges and innovations. Higher Education Policy, 2023, 36(2): 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00286-w doi: 10.1057/s41307-022-00286-w
    [47] Yang, R., China's internationalized higher education during COVID-19: Collective efforts and bifurcated realities. Higher Education Research & Development, 2021, 40(3): 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912 doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912
    [48] Jin, L. and Cortazzi, M., Practising cultures of learning in internationalizing universities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2016, 37(6): 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1072204 doi: 10.1080/01434632.2015.1072204
    [49] Marginson, S., Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2014, 18(1): 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313513036 doi: 10.1177/1028315313513036
    [50] Chen, G.M. and Starosta, W.J., Foundations of intercultural communication, University Press of America, 2005.
    [51] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. and Minkov, M., Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, 2010.
    [52] Gallagher, T.L., Building intercultural competence in international higher education collaborations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2021, 80: 94–104.
    [53] Tran, L.T. and Nguyen, N.T., Teacher professional learning in cross-cultural contexts: A case study of Vietnamese teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, 96: 103178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103178 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103178
    [54] Gregersen-Hermans, J. and Pusch, D., Intercultural competence in higher education: International approaches, assessment and application, Routledge, 2012.
    [55] Healey, N.M., The challenges of leading an international branch campus: The 'lived experience' of in-country senior managers. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2019, 23(1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318814207 doi: 10.1177/1028315318814207
    [56] Wang, L. and Duan, C., Intercultural adaptation of STEM faculty in Sino-foreign cooperative universities: A phenomenological study. Higher Education Research & Development, 2022, 41(4): 1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1896482 doi: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1896482
    [57] Huang, F. and Turner, Y., The localization of international branch campuses in China: Tensions and transformations. Higher Education, 2021, 81(3): 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00550-1 doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00550-1
    [58] Akkerman, S.F. and Meijer, P.C., A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011, 27(2): 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
    [59] Desimone, L.M. and Garet, M.S., Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 2015, 7(3): 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515 doi: 10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
    [60] Nguyen, T.L., Internationalization of higher education: Faculty experiences in curriculum design and teaching practices. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2020, 24(2): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888883 doi: 10.1177/1028315319888883
    [61] Leung, K., Cross-cultural management in international joint ventures: The role of cultural adaptation. Journal of World Business, 2010, 45(3): 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.003
    [62] Li, X. and Wang, L., Bridging the gap: Professional development for STEM teachers in cross-cultural contexts, Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003281234
    [63] Guskey, T.R., Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 2002, 8(3): 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512 doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
    [64] Hofstede, G., Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.), Sage Publications, 2001.
    [65] Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N., Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.), Sage Publications, 2018.
    [66] Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J., Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.), Jossey-Bass, 2015.
    [67] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. and Minkov, M., Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, 2010.
    [68] Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.), Sage Publications, 2015.
    [69] Fusch, P.I. and Ness, L.R., Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 2015, 20(9): 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281 doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
    [70] Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526442131
    [71] Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N., Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.), Sage, 2018.
    [72] Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L., Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 2000, 39(3): 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
    [73] Berger, R., Now I see it, now I don't: Researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 2015, 15(2): 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
    [74] Banks, J.A., Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (5th ed.), Pearson, 2006.
    [75] OECD, Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies, OECD Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-en
    [76] British Council, Future skills: Report on engineering and technology education in a globalized context. British Council, 2021.
    [77] Marginson, S. and Rhoades, G., Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 2022, 43(3): 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1014699605875
    [78] Schweisfurth, M., Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? Routledge, 2013.
    [79] Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T. and Kyndt, E., Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 61: 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
  • Author's biography Cuiyun, Wang is a PhD candidate at the Department of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. She has over 12 years working experience in Internationalization of Higher Education, especially within the area of transnational Joint Education; Norlizah C. H. is an associate professor at the Department of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. She is specialized in Sociology of Education; Mokhtar Muhamad is a senior lecturer at the Department of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. He is specialized in qualitative methodology in Philosophy of Education; Shuran, Zhang is a PhD candidate at the Department of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. She is interested in quantitative research
    Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1042) PDF downloads(60) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog