
The purpose of the present research was to study the efficacy of learner-generated videos published on YouTube as a formative assessment method. The impact of the assessment method on students' learning and satisfaction, peer learning, group dynamics and skill development was analyzed. An emerging innovation within assessment was done with the students of an undergraduate computer science course during the COVID pandemic. Fifty-four students (teams of three to four) were instructed to create YouTube videos explaining the database design of a case study, peer-reviewed by views and likes. A mixed-method approach with a sequential study design was employed. A questionnaire with 25 questions on learners' and groups' attributes and four open-ended questions was administered. This was followed by a semi-structured interview comprising 19 questions. The quota sampling method was used for selecting a sample of students for interviews. Content analysis of interview transcripts was performed with the NVivo software.
During the experiment, we faced a challenge due to a lack of confidence among some students in public speaking. However, the innovative and engaging assessment resulted in the active participation of learners. Development of new skills like communication, peer bonding, teamwork and resolving conflicts was observed. Additionally, a fair and transparent grading methodology was a satisfying experience. Subject learning and video editing knowledge were enriched by peer learning. The results of the study revealed that publishing learner-generated videos on YouTube had a positive impact on students' learning and satisfaction. We therefore recommend the same as an effective tool for formative assessment.
Citation: Shikha Gupta, Sarika Tomar, Anamika Gupta. Learner-generated YouTube presentations for formative assessment[J]. STEM Education, 2023, 3(4): 306-330. doi: 10.3934/steme.2023019
[1] | Huizhen Qu, Jianwen Zhou . S-asymptotically ω-periodic dynamics in a fractional-order dual inertial neural networks with time-varying lags. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2782-2809. doi: 10.3934/math.2022154 |
[2] | Yuehong Zhang, Zhiying Li, Wangdong Jiang, Wei Liu . The stability of anti-periodic solutions for fractional-order inertial BAM neural networks with time-delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6176-6190. doi: 10.3934/math.2023312 |
[3] | Hongmei Zhang, Xiangnian Yin, Hai Zhang, Weiwei Zhang . New criteria on global Mittag-Leffler synchronization for Caputo-type delayed Cohen-Grossberg Inertial Neural Networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29239-29259. doi: 10.3934/math.20231497 |
[4] | Ivanka Stamova, Gani Stamov . Impulsive control strategy for the Mittag-Leffler synchronization of fractional-order neural networks with mixed bounded and unbounded delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2287-2303. doi: 10.3934/math.2021138 |
[5] | Yang Xu, Zhouping Yin, Yuanzhi Wang, Qi Liu, Anwarud Din . Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization of uncertain fractional-order fuzzy complex valued neural networks with distributed and time-varying delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25577-25602. doi: 10.3934/math.20241249 |
[6] | Dan-Ning Xu, Zhi-Ying Li . Mittag-Leffler stabilization of anti-periodic solutions for fractional-order neural networks with time-varying delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1610-1619. doi: 10.3934/math.2023081 |
[7] | Pratap Anbalagan, Evren Hincal, Raja Ramachandran, Dumitru Baleanu, Jinde Cao, Michal Niezabitowski . A Razumikhin approach to stability and synchronization criteria for fractional order time delayed gene regulatory networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4526-4555. doi: 10.3934/math.2021268 |
[8] | Wei Liu, Qinghua Zuo, Chen Xu . Finite-time and global Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order neural networks with S-type distributed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8339-8352. doi: 10.3934/math.2024405 |
[9] | Mohammed D. Kassim . A fractional Halanay inequality for neutral systems and its application to Cohen-Grossberg neural networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2466-2491. doi: 10.3934/math.2025115 |
[10] | Tiecheng Zhang, Liyan Wang, Yuan Zhang, Jiangtao Deng . Finite-time stability for fractional-order fuzzy neural network with mixed delays and inertial terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19176-19194. doi: 10.3934/math.2024935 |
The purpose of the present research was to study the efficacy of learner-generated videos published on YouTube as a formative assessment method. The impact of the assessment method on students' learning and satisfaction, peer learning, group dynamics and skill development was analyzed. An emerging innovation within assessment was done with the students of an undergraduate computer science course during the COVID pandemic. Fifty-four students (teams of three to four) were instructed to create YouTube videos explaining the database design of a case study, peer-reviewed by views and likes. A mixed-method approach with a sequential study design was employed. A questionnaire with 25 questions on learners' and groups' attributes and four open-ended questions was administered. This was followed by a semi-structured interview comprising 19 questions. The quota sampling method was used for selecting a sample of students for interviews. Content analysis of interview transcripts was performed with the NVivo software.
During the experiment, we faced a challenge due to a lack of confidence among some students in public speaking. However, the innovative and engaging assessment resulted in the active participation of learners. Development of new skills like communication, peer bonding, teamwork and resolving conflicts was observed. Additionally, a fair and transparent grading methodology was a satisfying experience. Subject learning and video editing knowledge were enriched by peer learning. The results of the study revealed that publishing learner-generated videos on YouTube had a positive impact on students' learning and satisfaction. We therefore recommend the same as an effective tool for formative assessment.
In 1986, Babcock and Westervelt [1] first introduced an inertial term into neural networks. Second-order inertial neural networks are an extension of traditional neural networks that include a second-order term in their update formula. In the practical application of neural networks, such addition of inertial terms can lead to more complicated dynamical behaviors, such as bifurcation and chaos [2]. In the past decade, researchers have applied second-order inertial neural networks to various tasks, including recommendation systems, image recognition, and natural language processing. They have shown that these networks can achieve faster convergence and better generalization compared to traditional neural networks. Many efforts have been devoted for stability analysis of the inertial neural networks, and many interesting results have been established, such as [3,4,5].
Fuzzy cellular neural networks are combined with fuzzy logic and neural networks, which were initially introduced by Yang and Yang [6] in 1996. For neural networks, fuzzy logic can be used to handle uncertain inputs or outputs by defining fuzzy membership functions, which enables the network to make decisions based on partial or ambiguous information. Since fuzzy neural networks are more suitable and potential to tackle practical general problems, during the past few decades, a lot of results on the stability behaviors for fuzzy neural networks with delay have been obtained, see [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] and the references therein.
As we all know, compared with integer-order derivative, fractional-order derivatives provide a magnificent approach to describe memory and hereditary properties of various processes. Thus, it becomes more convenient and accurate to neural networks using fractional-order derivatives than integer-order ones. Dynamical behavior analysis, as well as existence, uniqueness, and stability of the equilibrium point of fractional order neural networks, has concerned growing interest in the past decades. Recently, the various kinds of stability problems for fractional-order neural networks, including Mittag-Leffler stability, asymptotic stability and uniform stability have been widely discussed, and some excellent results were obtained in both theory and applications. See, for example, previous works [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], and the references therein.
Fractional-order fuzzy cellular neural networks (FOFCNNs) are a type of neural network that combines the concepts of fuzzy logic and fractional calculus. They have been applied in various fields, including image processing, control systems, and pattern recognition. The analysis of stability for fractional-order fuzzy cellular neural networks requires the use of specialized methods, such as the fractional Lyapunov method and the Lyapunov function based on fuzzy sets to verify global, asymptotic and finite-time stability. For example, by using the fractional Barbalats lemma, Riemann-Liouville operator and Lyapunov stability theorem, Chen et.al. in [24] studied the asymptotic stability of delayed fractional-order fuzzy neural networks with fixed-time impulse. Zhao et.al. [25] investigated the finite-time synchronization for a class of fractional-order memristive fuzzy neural networks with leakage and transmission delays. In [26], Yang et.al. studied the finite-time stability for fractional-order fuzzy cellular neural networks involving leakage and discrete delays. By applying Lyapunov stability theorem and inequality scaling skills, Syed Ali et.al. [27] considered the impulsive effects on the stability equilibrium solution for Riemann-Liouville fractional-order fuzzy BAM neural networks with time delay. Recently, Hu et.al. [28] studied the finite-time stabilization of fractional-order quaternion-valued fuzzy NNs.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no paper on the global Mittag-Leffler stability of the fractional order fuzzy inertial neural networks with delays in the literature. There are several difficulties in handling fractional-order fuzzy inertial neural networks (FOFINNs). First, designing the structure and parameters of FOFINNs is challenging because of the high dimensionality of the network. Second, training FOFINNs is computationally intensive and requires specialized optimization algorithms. Finally, the interpretability and explainability of FOFINNs can be difficult, as the fuzzy logic, fractional calculus components and inertial terms can make it difficult to understand the underlying mechanisms of the model.
Motivated by the previous works mentioned above, we first propose a class of new Capoto fractional-order fuzzy inertial neural networks (CFOFNINND) with delays. The primary contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows:
(1) The global fractional Halanay inequalities and Lyapunov functional approach for studying the global Mittag-Leffler stability (MLS) of Caputo fractional-order fuzzy neural-type inertial neural networks with delay (CFOFNINND) are introduced;
(2) A new sufficient condition of the existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium solution for an CFOFNINND is established by means of Banach contraction mapping principle;
(3) The GMLS conditions are established, which are concise and easy to verify.
The remaining of this paper is structured as follows. In section 2, we will provide some lemmas that will help us to prove our main results. In section 3, the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium point of CFOFNINND are proved by using contraction mapping principle. Moreover, by constructing suitable Lyapunov functional, using the global fractional Halanay inequalities, the global Mittag-Leffler stability of CFOFNINND is derived. Additionally, a numerical example is provided to show the feasibility of the approaches in section 4. Finally, this article is concluded in Section 5.
In this paper, we consider the following fractional-order fuzzy neural-type inertial neural networks with delay (FOFNINND):
CDβ(CDβxi)(t)=−ai CDβxi(t)−cixi(t)+n∑j=1aijfj(xj(t))+n∑j=1bijμj+n∑j=1cijgj(xj(t−τ))+n⋀j=1αijfj(xj(t−τ))+n⋁j=1βijgj(xj(t−τ))+n⋀j=1Tijμj+n⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii, | (2.1) |
where CDβxi(t)=1Γ(1−β)∫t0(t−τ)−βx′i(τ)dτ denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order β (0<β≤1), n is the amount of units in the neural networks, xi(t) represents the state of ith neuron, ai>0, ci>0 are constants, τ>0 is the time delay, fj(xj(t)) represents the output of neurons at time t, gj(xj(t−τ)) represents the output of neurons at time t−τ, aij responds to the synaptic connection weight of the unit j to the unit i at time t, cij responds to the synaptic connection weight of the unit j to the unit i at time t−τj, and represent the fuzzy OR and fuzzy AND mapping, respectively; αij, βij, Tij and Hij denote the elements of fuzzy feedback MIN template, fuzzy feedback MAX template, fuzzy feed-forward MIN template and fuzzy feed-forward MAX template, respectively; μij denotes the external input; Ii represents the external bias of ith neuron.
The initial conditions for system (2.1) is
xi(s)=ϕi(s),CDβxi(s)=ψi(s),s∈[−τ,0]. | (2.2) |
Remark 2.1. If β=1, then system (2.1) is reduce to the following delayed fuzzy inertial neural networks :
x′′i(t)=−aix′i(t)−cixi(t)+n∑j=1aijfj(xj(t))+n∑j=1bijμj+n∑j=1cijgj(xj(t−τ))+n⋀j=1αijfj(xj(t−τ))+n⋁j=1βijgj(xj(t−τ))+n⋀j=1Tijμj+n⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii. |
In this section, we present some definitions and lemmas about Caputo fractional calculus, which will be used in the subsequent theoretical analysis.
Definition 2.1 [29]. The fractional integral of order α>0 for a function x(t) is defined as
D−αx(t)=1Γ(α)∫t0(t−τ)α−1x(τ)dτ. |
Definition 2.2 [30]. The Caputo derivative with fractional order α for a continuous function x(t) is denotes as
CDαx(t)=1Γ(m−α)∫t0(t−τ)m−α−1x(m)(τ)dτ, |
in which m−1<α<m, m∈Z+. Particularly, when 0<α<1
CDαx(t)=1Γ(1−α)∫t0(t−τ)−αx′(τ)dτ. |
According to Definition 2.2, we have
CDα(kx(t)+ly(t))=kCDαx(t)+lCDαy(t),∀k,l∈R. |
Definition 2.3 [31]. The equilibrium point x∗=(x∗1,x∗2,⋯,x∗n)T of CFOFNINND (2.1) is said to be globally Mittag-Leffler stable, if there exists positive constant γ, such that for any solution x(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),⋯,xn(t)) of (2.1) with initial value (2.2), we have
‖x(t)−x∗‖≤M(‖ϕ‖,‖ψ‖)Eα(−γtα),t≥0, |
where
‖x(t)−x∗‖=n∑i=1|xi(t)−x∗i|,‖ϕ‖=sup−τ≤s≤0n∑i=1|ϕi(s)|,‖ψ‖=sup−τ≤s≤0n∑i=1|ψi(s)|, |
M(‖ϕ‖,‖ψ‖)≥0 and Eα(⋅) is a Mittag-Leffler function.
Remark 2.2. The global Mittag-Leffler stability implies global asymptotic stability.
Lemma 2.1 [31]. Let 0<α<1. If G(t)∈C1[t0,+∞), then
CDα|G(t)|≤sgn(G(t))CDαG(t),t≥t0. |
Lemma 2.2 [32]. Assume x(t) and y(t) be two states of system (2.1), then we have
|n⋀j=1αijfj(xj(t))−n⋀j=1αijfj(yj(t))|≤n∑j=1|αij||fj(xj(t))−fj(yj(t)))|, |
|n⋁j=1βijgj(xj(t))−n⋁j=1βijgj(yj(t))|≤n∑j=1|βij||gj(xj(t))−gj(yj(t)))|. |
Lemma 2.3 [33]. Let a,b,c,ρ:[0,∞)→R be continuous functions and b,c,ρ be nonnegative. Assume that
supt≥0[a(t)+b(t)]=Λ<0,supt≥0−c(t)a(t)+b(t)<+∞,ρ(t)≤h for all t≥0. |
If a nonnegative continuous function u:[−h,T]→R satisfies the following fractional inequality
CDαu(t)≤a(t)u(t)+b(t)u(t−ρ(t))+c(t),t≥0, |
u(θ)=φ(θ),−h≤θ≤0, |
then
u(t)≤Eα(λ∗tα)sup−h≤θ≤0|φ(θ)|+sup0≤T−c(t)a(t)+b(t),t≥0, |
where λ∗=infλ{λ−a(t)−b(t)Eα(λhα)≥0, ∀t≥0}.
In particular, if b(t) and c(t) are bounded functions, namely 0≤b(t)≤ˉb and 0≤c(t)≤ˉc for all t>0, then
u(t)≤Eα(ˉλtα)sup−h≤θ≤0|φ(θ)|−ˉcΛ,for all t≥0, |
where ˉλ=(1+Γ(1−α)ˉbhα)−1Λ.
From Lemma 2.3, we obtain
Corollary 2.4. If a nonnegative continuous function u:[−h,T]→R satisfies the following fractional inequality
CDαu(t)≤−μu(t)+γu(t−ρ(t)),t≥0, |
u(θ)=φ(θ),−h≤θ≤0, |
where μ>γ>0 and ρ(t)≤h, then
u(t)≤Eα(ˉλtα)sup−h≤θ≤0|φ(θ)|,for all t≥0, |
where ˉλ=−(1+Γ(1−α)γhα)−1(μ−γ)<0.
In this section, we will study the existence, uniqueness and globally Mittag-Leffler stability of the equilibrium point for delayed Caputo fractional-order fuzzy inertial neural networks (2.1).
For β>0, we know that CDβa=0 for a constant a. Thus, we have the following definition.
Definition 3.1. A constant vector x∗=(x∗1,x∗2,...,x∗n)T is an equilibrium point of system (2.1) if and only if x∗ is a solution of the following equations:
−cix∗i+n∑j=1aijfj(x∗j)+n∑j=1bijμj+n∑j=1cijgj(x∗j)+n⋀j=1αijfj(x∗j)+n⋁j=1βijgj(x∗j)+n⋀j=1Tijμj+n⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii=0,i=1,2,⋯n. | (3.1) |
Theorem 3.1. Assume that
(H1) The functions fj,gj (j=1,2,...,n) are Lipschitz continuous. That is, there exist positive constants Fj,Gj such that
|fj(x)−fj(y)|≤Fj|x−y|,|gj(x)−gj(y)|≤Gj|x−y|,∀x,y∈R. |
hold. If there exist constants mi (i=1,2,...,n) such that the following inequality holds
mici−n∑j=1[mjFi(|aji|+|αji|)+mjGi(|cji|+|βji|)]>0,i=1,2,...,n, | (3.2) |
then CFOFNINND (2.1) has a unique equilibrium point.
Proof. ∀u=(u1,u2,...,un)T, we constructing a mapping P(u)=(P1(u),P2(u),...,Pn(u))T as follows
Pi(u)=min∑j=1aijfj(ujcjmj)+min∑j=1bijμj+min∑j=1cijgj(ujcjmj)+min⋀j=1αijfj(ujcjmj)+min⋁j=1βijgj(ujcjmj)+min⋀j=1Tijμj+min⋁j=1Hijμj+miIi. | (3.3) |
Let u=(u1,u2,...,un)T and v=(v1,v2,...,vn)T. From (H1) and Lemma 2.2, we obtain that
|Pi(u)−Pi(v)|≤|min∑j=1aij[fj(ujcjmj)−fj(vjcjmj)]|+|min∑j=1cij[gj(ujcjmj)−gj(vjcjmj)]|+mi|n⋀j=1αijfj(ujcjmj)−n⋀j=1αijfj(vjcjmj)|+mi|n⋁j=1βijgj(ujcjmj)−n⋁j=1βijgj(vjcjmj)|≤min∑j=1|aij|Fjcjmj|uj−vj|+min∑j=1|cij|Gjcjmj|uj−vj|+min∑j=1|αij|Fjcjmj|uj−vj|+min∑j=1|βij|Gjcjmj|uj−vj|=min∑j=11cjmj[Fj(|aij|+|αij|)+Gj(|cij|+|βij|)]|uj−vj|. |
Moreover, we obtain by (3.2) that
n∑i=1|Pi(u)−Pi(v)|≤n∑i=1min∑j=11cjmj[Fj(|aij|+|αij|)+Gj(|cij|+|βij|)]|uj−vj|=n∑i=1n∑j=11cjmj[miFj(|aij|+|αij|)+miGj(|cij|+|βij|)]|uj−vj|=n∑i=1(n∑j=11cimi[mjFi(|aji|+|αji|)+mjGi(|cji|+|βji|)])|ui−vi|<n∑i=1|ui−vi|, |
which implies that ‖P(u)−P(v)‖<‖u−v‖. That is, P is a contraction mapping on Rn. So, we can conclude that there exists a unique fixed pint u∗ such that P(u∗)=u∗, i.e.,
u∗i=min∑j=1aijfj(u∗jcjmj)+min∑j=1bijμj+min∑j=1cijgj(u∗jcjmj)+min⋀j=1αijfj(u∗jcjmj)+min⋁j=1βijgj(u∗jcjmj)+min⋀j=1Tijμj+min⋁j=1Hijμj+miIi. |
Assume x∗i=u∗icimi, we can get
−cix∗i+n∑j=1aijfj(x∗j)+n∑j=1bijμj+n∑j=1cijgj(x∗j)+n⋀j=1αijfj(x∗j)+n⋁j=1βijgj(x∗j)+n⋀j=1Tijμj+n⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii=0, |
which indicates that x∗i is a unique solution of (3.1). So, x∗ is the unique equilibrium point of system (2.1). This proof is completed.
By using the transformation xi(t)=yi(t)+x∗i, the equilibrium point of (2.1) can be shifted to the origin, that is, system (2.1) can be transformed into
CDβ(CDβyi)(t)=−ai CDβyi(t)−ciyi(t)+n∑j=1aij[fj(yj(t)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j)]+n∑j=1cij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)]+n⋀j=1αij[fj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j)]+n⋁j=1βij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)],i=1,2,⋯,n. | (3.4) |
In (3.4), we adopt a variable transformation : zi(t)=Dβyi(t)+kiyi(t). Then system (3.4) can be rewritten as follows:
{Dβzi(t)=−(ai−ki)zi(t)−(ci−(ai−ki)ki)yi(t)+n∑j=1aij[fj(yj(t)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j)]+n∑j=1cij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)]+n⋀j=1αij[fj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j)]+n⋁j=1βij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)],t≥0,Dβyi(t)=zi(t)−kiyi(t). | (3.5) |
The initial conditions for system (3.5) is
yi(s)=ϕi(s)−x∗i,zi(s)=ψi(s)+ki(ϕi(s)−x∗i),−τ≤s≤0. | (3.6) |
Theorem 3.2. Let 0<β≤1. Assume that (H1) holds. If there exist proper positive parameters mi and pi, satisfying (3.2) and the following inequality :
min1≤i≤n{ki−Fimin∑j=1pj|aji|−pimi|ci−(ai−ki)ki|,(ai−ki)−mipi}>max1≤i≤n{Fimin∑j=1pj|αji|+Gimin∑j=1pj(|cji|+|βji|)}, | (3.7) |
then CFOFNINND (2.1) has a unique equilibrium point which is globally Mittag-Leffler stable.
Proof. By Theorem 3.1 we know that (2.1) has a unique equilibrium point (x∗1,x∗2,...,x∗n). Construct the Lyapunov function candidate defined by
V(t)=n∑i=1mi|yi(t)|+n∑i=1pi|zi(t)|, |
where mi, pi are unknown positive constants, which need to be determined. Based on Lemma 2.1 and (3.5), calculating the fractional-order derivative of V(t) :
CDαV(t)=n∑i=1misgn(yi(t))CDαyi(t)+n∑i=1pisgn(zi(t))CDαzi(t)=n∑i=1pisgn(zi(t)){−(ai−ki)zi(t)−(ci−(ai−ki)ki)yi(t)+n∑j=1aij(fj(yj(t)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j))+n∑j=1cij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)]+n⋀j=1αij[fj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−fj(x∗j)]+n⋁j=1βij[gj(yj(t−τj)+x∗j)−gj(x∗j)]}+n∑i=1misgn(yi(t))(zi(t)−kiyi(t)]≤n∑i=1pi{−(ai−ki)|zi(t)|+|ci−(ai−ki)ki||yi(t)|+n∑j=1|aij|Fj|yj(t)|+n∑j=1|cij|Gj|yj(t−τj)|+n∑j=1|αij|Fj|yj(t−τj)|+n∑j=1|βij|Gj|yj(t−τj)|}+n∑i=1mi(|zi(t)|−ki|yi(t)|)=−n∑i=1mi[ki−Fimin∑j=1pj|aji|−pimi|ci−(ai−ki)ki|]|yi(t)|−n∑i=1pi[(ai−ki)−mipi]|zi(t)|+n∑i=1mi[Fimin∑j=1pj|αij|+Gimin∑j=1pj(|cji|+|βij|)]|yi(t−τi)|≤−μV(t)+γV(t−τ), | (3.8) |
where
μ=min1≤i≤n{ki−Fimin∑j=1pj|aji|−pimi|ci−(ai−ki)ki|,(ai−ki)−mipi}, |
and
γ=max1≤i≤n{Fimin∑j=1pj|αji|+Gimin∑j=1pj(|cji|+|βji|)}. |
Based on Corollary 2.4, one can infer that
V(t)≤Eα(ˉλtα)sup−τ≤θ≤0|V(θ)|, |
where ˉλ=−(1+Γ(1−α)γτα)−1(μ−γ), and
V(θ)=n∑i=1mi|ϕi(s)−x∗i|+n∑i=1pi|ψi(s)+ki(ϕi(s)−x∗i)|. |
Obviously, we have
sup−τ≤θ≤0|V(θ)|≤max1≤i≤n{mi+kipi, pi}(‖ϕ‖+‖ψ‖)+max1≤i≤n(mi+kipi)‖x∗‖=L1(‖ϕ‖+‖ψ‖)+L2, |
where L1=max1≤i≤n{mi+kipi, pi}>0 and L2=max1≤i≤n(mi+kipi)‖x∗‖>0. Thus, one obtain
‖y(t)‖+‖z(t)‖≤1min1≤i≤n{mi,pi}(n∑i=1mi|yi(t)|+n∑i=1pi|zi(t)|)≤Ω(L1(‖ϕ‖+‖ψ‖)+L2)Eα(ˉλtα), |
where Ω=1min1≤i≤n{mi,pi}>0, which implies that the unique equilibrium point (x∗1,x∗2,...,x∗n) of CFOFNINND (2.1) is globally Mittag-Leffler stable. The theorem 3.2 is proved.
Example 4.1. Consider a two-dimensional Caputo fractional fuzzy inertial neural network with delay:
CDβ(CDβxi)(t)=−ai CDβxi(t)−cixi(t)+2∑j=1aijtanh(xj(t))+2∑j=1bijμj+2∑j=1cijsin(xj(t−τj))+2⋀j=1αijtanh(xj(t−τj))+2⋁j=1βijtanh(xj(t−τj))+2⋀j=1Tijμj+2⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii,t≥0,i=1,2. | (4.1) |
Two initial values of system (4.1) are given by
x1(s)=0.8,x2(s)=−0.1,CDβx1(s)=−1.8,CDβx2(s)=1.2,−1≤s≤0, | (4.2) |
and
x1(s)=1.0,x2(s)=0.5,CDβx1(s)=−2.0,CDβx2(s)=−1.3,−1≤s≤0. | (4.3) |
The parameters of system (4.1) are set as β=0.85, τ1=τ2=1, a1=7, a2=6, c1=11.3, c2=8.7, a11=0.3, a12=−0.2, c11=−0.4, c12=0.1, α11=0.2, α12=−0.6, β11=0.1, β12=0.3, a21=−0.2, a22=0.3, c21=0.1, c22=−0.2, α21=−0.35, α22=0.2, β21=−0.2, β22=0.3, I1=3.4490, I2=3.3377, μi=0.3 (i=1,2), and
(bij)2×2=(Tij)2×2=(Hij)2×2=[0.2000.3]. |
The Lipchitz constants Fj=1 for fj(⋅)=tanh(⋅) and Gj=1 for gj(⋅)=sin(⋅) (j=1,2). Let parameters mi=pi=1 (i=1,2). Then,
m1c1−2∑j=1[mjF1(|aj1|+|αj1|)+mjG1(|cj1|+|βj1|)]=9.45>0, |
and
m2c2−2∑j=1[mjF2(|aj2|+|αj2|)+mjG2(|cj2|+|βj2|)]=6.5>0, |
which implies that (3.2) holds. Thus, by Theorem 3.1, the equilibrium point (x∗1,x∗2) of system (4.1) is the unique solution of the following system:
−cix∗i+2∑j=1aijtanh(x∗j)+2∑j=1bijμj+2∑j=1cijsin(x∗j)+2⋀j=1αijtanh(x∗j)+2⋁j=1βijsin(x∗j)+2⋀j=1Tijμj+2⋁j=1Hijμj+Ii=0,i=1,2. |
By matlab, we easy to get that x∗1=0.3 and x∗2=0.4. Obviously, the conditions (H1) hold. Moreover, letting parameters k1=4 and k2=3, one has
k1−F1m12∑j=1pj|aj1|−p1m1|c1−(a1−k1)k1|=2.8, |
k2−F2m22∑j=1pj|aj2|−p2m2|c2−(a2−k2)k2|=2.2, |
(a1−k1)−m1p1=2,(a2−k2)−m2p2=2, |
F1m12∑j=1pj|αj1|+G1m12∑j=1pj(|cj1|+|βj1|)=1.35, |
and
F2m22∑j=1pj|αj2|+G2m22∑j=1pj(|cj2|+|βj2|)=1.7. |
Thus μ=2>γ=1.7, that is the inequality (3.7) holds. Thus, by Theorem 3.2, the unique equilibrium point (0.3,0.4) of the system (4.1) is globally Mittag-Leffler stable (see Figures 1 and 2).
The theoretical research on the fractional-order neural-type inertial neural networks is still relatively few. In this paper, we first propose and investigate a class of delayed fractional-order fuzzy inertial neural networks. With the help of contraction mapping principle, the sufficient condition is obtained to ensure the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium point of system (2.1). Based on the global fractional Halanay inequalities, and by constructing suitable Lyapunov functional, some sufficient conditions are obtained to ensure the global Mittag-Leffler stability of system (2.1). These conditions are relatively easy to verify. Finally, a numerical example is presented to show the effectiveness of our theoretical results.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
We are really thankful to the reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions that have improved the quality of our manuscript. This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (11571136).
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
[1] | Neo, M. and Neo, K.T., Innovative teaching: Using multimedia in a problem-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 2001, 4(4): 19–31. |
[2] |
Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T. and Schmidt, P., Video and online learning: Critical reflections and findings from the field. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577882 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2577882
![]() |
[3] | Sirkemaa, S. and Varpelaide, H., Experiences from using video in learning process. In EDULEARN16 Proceedings, 2016,460–465. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.1087 |
[4] |
Brame, C.J., Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. cbe life sciences education. CBE life sciences education, 2016, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125 doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
![]() |
[5] |
Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Nisbet, G. and Roper, L., Time for university educators to embrace student videography. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2019, 49(6): 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1590528 doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2019.1590528
![]() |
[6] |
Abbas, N. and Qassim, T., Investigating the effectiveness of youtube as a learning tool among efl students at baghdad university. Arab World English Journal, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/myqde doi: 10.31235/osf.io/myqde
![]() |
[7] | Gedera, D. and Zalipour, A., Video pedagogy theory and practice: Theory and practice, Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1 |
[8] |
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., et al., Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 2021, 91(2): 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713 doi: 10.3102/0034654321990713
![]() |
[9] | Berk, R., Multimedia teaching with video clips: Tv, movies, youtube, and mtvu in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2009, 5: 1–21. |
[10] |
Azer, S., Algrain, H., Alkhelaif, R. and Aleshaiwi, S., Evaluation of the educational value of youtube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Journal of medical Internet research, 2013, 15(11): e2728. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2728 doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728
![]() |
[11] |
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., Yusaini, M., Ayob, J. and Ishak, R., The potential of youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013,103: 1118–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.439 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.439
![]() |
[12] |
Sari, A., Dardjito, H. and Azizah, D., Efl students' improvement through the reflective youtube video project. International Journal of Instruction, 2020, 13(4): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13425a doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13425a
![]() |
[13] |
Sedigheh, M., Ainin, S., Noor, I.J. and Nafisa, K., Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube. The International Journal of Management Education, 2018, 16(1): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
![]() |
[14] |
Kaplan, A. and Haenlein, M., Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 2010, 53(1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
![]() |
[15] |
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. and Hughes, J., Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research–what path should we take "now"? Educational Researcher, 2009, 38(4): 246–259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671 doi: 10.3102/0013189X09336671
![]() |
[16] | Harris, A. and Rea, A., Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on is education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 2009, 20(2): 137–144. |
[17] |
Epps, B., Luo, T. and Muljana, P., Lights, camera, activity! a systematic review of research on learner-generated videos. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2021, 20: 405–427. https://doi.org/10.28945/4874 doi: 10.28945/4874
![]() |
[18] |
El-Said, O. and Aziz, H., Virtual tours a means to an end: An analysis of virtual tours' role in tourism recovery post covid-19. Journal of Travel Research, 2022, 61(3): 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997567 doi: 10.1177/0047287521997567
![]() |
[19] |
Gallardo-Williams, M., Morsch, L., Paye, C. and Seery, M., Student-generated video in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2020, 21(2): 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00182D doi: 10.1039/C9RP00182D
![]() |
[20] |
Pereira, J., Echeazarra, L., Sanz-Santamaría, S. and Gutiérrez, J., Student-generated online videos to develop cross-curricular and curricular competencies in nursing studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 31: 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.011
![]() |
[21] |
Orús, C., Barlés, M.J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E. and Gurrea, R., The effects of learner-generated videos for youtube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 2016, 95: 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007
![]() |
[22] | Reyna, J., Horgan, F., Ramp, D. and Meier, P., Using learner-generated digital media (lgdm) as an assessment tool in geological sciences. In 11th International Conference on Technology, Education and Development (INTED). Iated-int Assoc Technology Education & Development, 2017. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.0116 |
[23] |
Reyna, J. and Meier, P., Using the learner-generated digital media (lgdm) framework in tertiary science education: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 2018, 8(3): 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030106 doi: 10.3390/educsci8030106
![]() |
[24] |
Reyna, J., Digital media assignments in undergraduate science education: an evidence-based approach. Research in Learning Technology, 2021, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2573 doi: 10.25304/rlt.v29.2573
![]() |
[25] |
Reyna, J. and Meier, P., Co-creation of knowledge using mobile technologies and digital media as pedagogical devices in undergraduate stem education. Research in Learning Technology, 2020, 28: 2356. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2356 doi: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2356
![]() |
[26] |
Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Orús, C. and Pérez-Rueda, A., Developing a learning network on youtube: Analysis of student satisfaction with a learner-generated content activity. Educational Networking: A Novel Discipline for Improved Learning Based on Social Networks, 2020,195–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_6 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_6
![]() |
[27] |
Nikolic, S., Stirling, D. and Ros, M., Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using youtube: self- and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2017, 43(4): 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569 doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569
![]() |
[28] | Zeballos, J., Meier, P. and Rodgers, K., Implementing digital media presentations as assessment tools for pharmacology students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, 4: 983–991. |
[29] |
Fralinger, B. and Owens, R., You tube as a learning tool. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 2009, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i8.1110 doi: 10.19030/tlc.v6i8.1110
![]() |
[30] | Pérez-Mateo, M., Maina, M.F., Guitert, M. and Romero, M., Learner generated content: Quality criteria in online collaborative learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 2011, 14(2). |
[31] |
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
![]() |