Research article

Development and piloting of the Movement Observations during Play (MOP) measure

  • Published: 29 September 2026
  • Background 

    Fundamental movement skills (FMS) underpin children's physical activity and healthy development, yet few observational tools capture the specific movements children demonstrate during child-led outdoor play, including outdoor loose parts play (OLPP).

    Purpose 

    Our purpose of this study was to develop and pilot Movement Observations during Play (MOP), an observational measure designed to document school-aged children's FMS during play and examine its preliminary inter-rater reliability (IRR).

    Methods 

    MOP was developed through a review of relevant literature and adaptation of the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Environmental (OSRAC-E). OSRAC-E movement categories were expanded to include 14 additional distinct movements, and 15 FMS were added based on the literature, stakeholder consultation, and iterative reliability rounds. MOP was then used in field-based observations across four outdoor play sites in Nova Scotia, Canada with children between the ages of 3–12 years. Two observers independently recorded children's movements occurring within 15-second play events, and IRR was assessed across sites.

    Results 

    MOP captured 46 unique FMS across locomotor, object control, and stability categories. During reliability rounds, 40 of 46 skills (86.9%) were observed, suggesting the measure captures a broad range of movements expressed during outdoor play. Agreement for recording at least one of the same movements within a play event was high across sites (κ = 0.93–0.98; overall κ = 0.96). Observers also consistently recorded two of the same movements within a 15-second play event. Agreement for three or more matched movements was lower and more variable. Additional analyses showed strong consistency for commonly observed movements such as walking, standing, running, carrying, and holding, with agreement improving across sites over time.

    Conclusions 

    MOP shows promise as an observational measure for documenting a wide range of FMS during child-led play, including OLPP, and for examining how children express movement in these play contexts.

    Citation: Nila Joshi, Son Truong, Janet Loebach, Daniel Rainham, Becky Feicht, Michelle R. Stone. Development and piloting of the Movement Observations during Play (MOP) measure[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2026, 13(4): 976-998. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2026051

    Related Papers:

  • Background 

    Fundamental movement skills (FMS) underpin children's physical activity and healthy development, yet few observational tools capture the specific movements children demonstrate during child-led outdoor play, including outdoor loose parts play (OLPP).

    Purpose 

    Our purpose of this study was to develop and pilot Movement Observations during Play (MOP), an observational measure designed to document school-aged children's FMS during play and examine its preliminary inter-rater reliability (IRR).

    Methods 

    MOP was developed through a review of relevant literature and adaptation of the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Environmental (OSRAC-E). OSRAC-E movement categories were expanded to include 14 additional distinct movements, and 15 FMS were added based on the literature, stakeholder consultation, and iterative reliability rounds. MOP was then used in field-based observations across four outdoor play sites in Nova Scotia, Canada with children between the ages of 3–12 years. Two observers independently recorded children's movements occurring within 15-second play events, and IRR was assessed across sites.

    Results 

    MOP captured 46 unique FMS across locomotor, object control, and stability categories. During reliability rounds, 40 of 46 skills (86.9%) were observed, suggesting the measure captures a broad range of movements expressed during outdoor play. Agreement for recording at least one of the same movements within a play event was high across sites (κ = 0.93–0.98; overall κ = 0.96). Observers also consistently recorded two of the same movements within a 15-second play event. Agreement for three or more matched movements was lower and more variable. Additional analyses showed strong consistency for commonly observed movements such as walking, standing, running, carrying, and holding, with agreement improving across sites over time.

    Conclusions 

    MOP shows promise as an observational measure for documenting a wide range of FMS during child-led play, including OLPP, and for examining how children express movement in these play contexts.


    Abbreviations

    FMS

    fundamental movement skills

    PA

    physical activity

    OLPP

    outdoor loose parts play

    BM

    behavioural mapping

    PLEY

    physical literacy in early years

    MOP

    movement observations during play

    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    We would like to thank PLEY School members, Julie Campbell, Jane Cawley, Kaitlyn Mooney, and Brayden Thomas for their invaluable assistance with the development and testing of the observational measure. We also extend our gratitude to Dr. Hilary Caldwell for her expert consultation on the observational measure, and Shelley McKibbon for her support in database searches (literature review). Our sincere thanks go to Drs. Janet Loebach and Adina Cox for their training and the sharing of their expertise in behavioural mapping, which greatly enhanced the methodology of this study. Funding Support: This project was funded through a Research Nova Scotia Establishment Grant, 2019–2022, Grant Number 2187.

    Authors' contributions



    N.J. conceived the study, collected, organized, and analyzed the data, interpreted the findings, and drafted the manuscript. S.T., J.L., D.R., B.F., and M.S. provided feedback on the study design, analysis, interpretation of the findings, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Coe DP (2020) Means of optimizing physical activity in the preschool environment. Am J Lifestyle Med 14: 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827618818419
    [2] Jones D, Innerd A, Giles EL, et al. (2020) Association between fundamental motor skills and physical activity in the early years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci 9: 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.03.001
    [3] Loprinzi PD, Davis RE, Fu YC (2015) Early motor skill competence as a mediator of child and adult physical activity. Prev Med Rep 2: 833-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.015
    [4] Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL (2021) Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    [5] Flannigan C, Dietze B (2018) Children, outdoor play, and loose parts. J Child Stud 42: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs.v42i4.18103
    [6] Lee EY, de Lannoy L, Li L, et al. (2022) Play, Learn, and Teach Outdoors—Network (PLaTO-Net): terminology, taxonomy, and ontology. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 19: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01294-0
    [7] Branje K, Stevens D, Hobson H, et al. (2021) Impact of an outdoor loose parts intervention on Nova Scotia preschoolers' fundamental movement skills: a multi-methods randomized controlled trial. AIMS Public Health 9: 194-215. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022015
    [8] Caldwell HAT, Spencer RA, Joshi N, et al. (2023) Impact of an outdoor loose parts play intervention on Nova Scotian preschoolers' physical literacy: a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 23: 1126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16030-x
    [9] Maxwell LE, Mitchell MR, Evans GW (2008) Effects of play equipment and loose parts on preschool children's outdoor play behavior: An observational study and design intervention. Child Youth Environ 18: 36-63. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2008.0025
    [10] Naish C, McCormack GR, Blackstaffe A, et al. (2023) An observational study on play and physical activity associated with a recreational facility-led park-based “loose parts” play intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Children 10: 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061049
    [11] Olsen H, Smith B (2017) Sandboxes, loose parts, and playground equipment: a descriptive exploration of outdoor play environments. Early Child Dev Care 187: 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1282928
    [12] Spencer RA, Joshi N, Branje K, et al. (2019) Educator perceptions on the benefits and challenges of loose parts play in the outdoor environments of childcare centres. AIMS Public Health 6: 461-476. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.461
    [13] Spencer RA, Joshi N, Branje K, et al. (2021) Early childhood educator perceptions of risky play in an outdoor loose parts intervention. AIMS Public Health 8: 213-228. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2021017
    [14] Houser NE, Cawley J, Kolen AM, et al. (2019) A loose parts randomized controlled trial to promote active outdoor play in preschool-aged children: Physical Literacy in the Early Years (PLEY) Project. Methods Protoc 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps2020027
    [15] Ulrich DA (2017) Introduction to the special section: Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3. J Mot Learn Dev 5: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0020
    [16] Boulton P, Thomas A (2022) How does play in the outdoors afford opportunities for schema development in young children?. Int J Play 11: 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2022.2069348
    [17] Loebach J, Cox A (2022) Playing in “The Backyard”: Environmental features and conditions of a natural playspace which support diverse outdoor play activities among younger children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 12661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912661
    [18] Sutton MJ (2011) In the hand and mind: The intersection of loose parts and imagination in evocative settings for young children. Child Youth Environ 21: 408-424. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2011.0000
    [19] Cosco NG, Moore RC, Islam MZ (2010) Behavior mapping: A method for linking preschool physical activity and outdoor design. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cea27a
    [20] Cox A, Loebach J, Little S (2018) Understanding the nature play milieu: Using behavior mapping to investigate children's activities in outdoor play spaces. Child Youth Environ 28: 232-261. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.28.2.0232
    [21] Loebach J, Cox A (2020) Tool for Observing Play Outdoors (TOPO): A new typology for capturing children's play behaviors in outdoor environments. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 5611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155611
    [22] Play Outside NS Outdoor Loose Parts Play—Event Recap [Video] (2020). [cited 2026 June 15]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RjvBc-G3Hg
    [23] Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [24] (2021) IBM CorpIBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
    [25] Pallant J (2016) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
    [26] McIver KL, Brown WH, Pfeiffer KA, et al. (2016) Development and testing of the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children: Elementary School. Res Q Exerc Sport 87: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1125994
    [27] Brown WH, Pfeiffer KA, McIver KL, et al. (2006) Assessing preschool children's physical activity: The Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Preschool Version. Res Q Exerc Sport 77: 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599351
    [28] Puhl J, Greaves K, Hoyt M, et al. (1990) Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS): Description and calibration. Res Q Exerc Sport 61: 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1990.10607475
    [29] McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22: 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
    [30] Lim C, Donovan AM, Harper NJ, et al. (2017) Nature elements and fundamental motor skill development opportunities at five elementary school districts in British Columbia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14: 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101279
    [31] Montoya-Fernández C, Gil-Madrona P, Losada-Puente L, et al. (2024) Play-based assessment: Psychometric properties of an early childhood learning and development assessment battery. Educ Sci 14: 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111240
    [32] Eddy LH, Bingham DD, Crossley KL, et al. (2020) The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review. PLoS One 15: e0237919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237919
    [33] Halpin SN (2024) Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: Considerations for its use. Am J Qual Res 8: 23-43. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14887
    [34] Monahan T, Fisher JA (2010) Benefits of “observer effects”: Lessons from the field. Qual Res 10: 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110362874
  • publichealth-13-04-051-s001.pdf
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Metrics

Article views(327) PDF downloads(39) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog