Research article Special Issues

Health workforce readiness for future pandemics: Evidence from undergraduate health sciences students in Georgia

  • Published: 06 August 2026
  • Background 

    Strengthening health workforce preparedness has become a critical public health priority in the post-COVID-19 era, particularly in countries facing workforce shortages and uneven integration of preparedness competencies. This study evaluated self-perceived pandemic preparedness among final-year biomedical and health sciences students in Georgia and examined the role of undergraduate education in preparing students for future public health emergencies.

    Methods 

    A cross-sectional survey was conducted among final-year students from medicine, dentistry, public health, nursing, and pharmacy programs (n = 296), with nursing (n = 6) and pharmacy (n = 1) students underrepresented. An adapted questionnaire assessed self-perceived preparedness, COVID-19 response participation, willingness to engage in future public health emergencies, and educational experiences. Preparedness dimensions were identified using exploratory factor analysis, and statistical analyses included descriptive, inferential, and regression methods.

    Results 

    Overall preparedness was moderate (M = 3.50, SD = 1.14). Two preparedness dimensions were identified: theoretical, preventive, communicative, and clinical knowledge and clinical and practical readiness. Practical skills, infection control participation, and emergency response activities showed the strongest associations with overall preparedness (p < 0.001). Despite moderate preparedness, 84.1% of students expressed willingness to contribute to future public health emergencies, rising to 97.5% among those with COVID-19 response experience. Students with COVID-19 response experience demonstrated higher preparedness across domains. Clinical and medical training were identified as the highest priority for curricular reform (43.6%), surpassing preventive, theoretical, and communication-focused measures.

    Conclusions 

    A gap exists between students' willingness to contribute during public health emergencies and their self-perceived preparedness. These findings suggest that undergraduate education may play an important role in strengthening preparedness for future public health emergencies. Greater emphasis on experiential learning, simulation-based training, and supervised participation in public health activities may help improve perceived preparedness. Georgia provides a relevant case study for countries facing similar workforce constraints and fragmented integration of preparedness competencies within undergraduate education.

    Citation: Dea Goderdzishvili, Elza Nikoleishvili. Health workforce readiness for future pandemics: Evidence from undergraduate health sciences students in Georgia[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2026, 13(3): 831-848. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2026044

    Related Papers:

  • Background 

    Strengthening health workforce preparedness has become a critical public health priority in the post-COVID-19 era, particularly in countries facing workforce shortages and uneven integration of preparedness competencies. This study evaluated self-perceived pandemic preparedness among final-year biomedical and health sciences students in Georgia and examined the role of undergraduate education in preparing students for future public health emergencies.

    Methods 

    A cross-sectional survey was conducted among final-year students from medicine, dentistry, public health, nursing, and pharmacy programs (n = 296), with nursing (n = 6) and pharmacy (n = 1) students underrepresented. An adapted questionnaire assessed self-perceived preparedness, COVID-19 response participation, willingness to engage in future public health emergencies, and educational experiences. Preparedness dimensions were identified using exploratory factor analysis, and statistical analyses included descriptive, inferential, and regression methods.

    Results 

    Overall preparedness was moderate (M = 3.50, SD = 1.14). Two preparedness dimensions were identified: theoretical, preventive, communicative, and clinical knowledge and clinical and practical readiness. Practical skills, infection control participation, and emergency response activities showed the strongest associations with overall preparedness (p < 0.001). Despite moderate preparedness, 84.1% of students expressed willingness to contribute to future public health emergencies, rising to 97.5% among those with COVID-19 response experience. Students with COVID-19 response experience demonstrated higher preparedness across domains. Clinical and medical training were identified as the highest priority for curricular reform (43.6%), surpassing preventive, theoretical, and communication-focused measures.

    Conclusions 

    A gap exists between students' willingness to contribute during public health emergencies and their self-perceived preparedness. These findings suggest that undergraduate education may play an important role in strengthening preparedness for future public health emergencies. Greater emphasis on experiential learning, simulation-based training, and supervised participation in public health activities may help improve perceived preparedness. Georgia provides a relevant case study for countries facing similar workforce constraints and fragmented integration of preparedness competencies within undergraduate education.


    Abbreviations

    COVID-19

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    M

    mean

    SD

    standard deviation

    CI

    confidence interval

    EFA

    exploratory factor analysis

    KMO

    Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy

    SPSS

    Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

    IBM

    International Business Machines

    OR

    odds ratio

    R2

    coefficient of determination

    α

    alpha (level of statistical significance or Cronbach's alpha)

    χ2

    chi-square

    η2

    eta-squared

    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    The authors extend their gratitude to the participating universities and students for their invaluable insights. We also thank several colleagues and research coordinators for their expert feedback and time. A special thank you to Dr. Mariam Jashi, Dr. Sopo Maglakelidze and Irakli Goderdzishvili. This quantitative study forms part of a broader doctoral research in Public Health that employs a mixed-methods approach to evaluate pandemic preparedness and response in biomedical and health sciences education in Georgia. Elements of the dataset have also been used in a separate mixed methods manuscript currently under review elsewhere. The present manuscript reports distinct analyses, results, and interpretations.

    Authors' contributions



    D.G. conceptualized and conducted the study, developed the mixed-methods design and research instruments, performed data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. E.N., PhD supervisor of D.G., contributed to study design refinement, supervised the research process, oversaw ethical approval procedures, coordinated and supported questionnaire distribution, and contributed to the interpretation of findings and the discussion section.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] World Health Organization (2019) Addressing the 18 million health worker shortfall: 35 concrete actions and 6 key messages. [cited 2026 March 08]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-addressing-the-18-million-health-worker-shortfall-35-concrete-actions-and-6-key-messages
    [2] Bandyopadhyay S, Baticulon RE, Kadhum M, et al. (2020) Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: A systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 5: e003097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003097
    [3] Gómez-Ibáñez R, Watson C, Leyva-Moral JM, et al. (2020) Final-year nursing students called to work: Experiences of a rushed labour insertion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse Educ Pract 49: 102920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102920
    [4] Bazan D, Nowicki M, Rzymski P (2021) Medical students as the volunteer workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: Polish experience. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 55: 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102109
    [5] Rupley D, Grilo SA, Kondragunta S, et al. (2020) Mobilization of health professions students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semin Perinatol 44: 151276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151276
    [6] Mak KA, Sheikh AR, Grieve S, et al. (2021) Lessons learnt from medical students' experiences of volunteering in the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future Healthc J 8: e734. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.Let.8.3.1
    [7] Aladashvili G, Kirvalidze M, Tskitishvili A, et al. (2025) Strengthening health workforce in Georgia: Identifying gaps and integrating evidence-based strategic planning. Int J Health Plann Manage 40: 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3922
    [8] UNICEF (2021) Young medical students became active advocates for COVID-19 vaccination, thanks to UNICEF and USAID joint campaign in Georgia. [cited 2026 March 09]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/georgia/press-releases/young-medical-students-became-active-advocates-covid-19-vaccination-thanks-unicef
    [9] Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin (2025) PREPARED: Pandemic preparedness and emergency response in academic development. [cited 2026 June 19]. Available from: https://www.forum-uni-notfall.de/en/prepared_pandemic_preparedness
    [10] University of Antwerp (2025) Pandemic preparedness summer school. [cited 2026 March 01]. Available from: https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/summer-winter-schools/pandemic-preparedness/programme/
    [11] Zoidze A, Gabunia T, Ekberg A, et al. (2021) From Crisis to Opportunity: Advancing Primary Health Care Reform Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. [cited 2026 March 05]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/primary-health-care-georgia-eng.pdf
    [12] Nagel DA, Penner JL, Halas G, et al. (2024) Exploring experiential learning within interprofessional practice education initiatives for pre-licensure healthcare students: A scoping review. BMC Med Educ 24: 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w
    [13] Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, et al. (2024) The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 103: e38813. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
    [14] Nejadghaderi SA, Khoshgoftar Z, Fazlollahi A, et al. (2024) Medical education during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An umbrella review. Front Med 11: 1358084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1358084
    [15] Goderdzishvili D, Nikoleishvili E (2025) Strengthening pandemic preparedness in undergraduate education through curricular reform: Post-COVID-19 insights. Eur Sci J 21: 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n24p1
    [16] Joseph N, Manasvi M (2022) Perception of medical undergraduate students regarding their readiness to volunteer in relief activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-institutional study in South India. Fam Med Prim Care Rev 24: 120. https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2022.115872
    [17] Lazarus G, Findyartini A, Putera AM, et al. (2021) Willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey in Indonesia. BMC Med Educ 21: 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02576-0
    [18] Barqawi HJ, Kampani DD, Haddad ES, et al. (2021) Readiness of physicians and medical students to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic in the UAE. PLoS One 16: e0251270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251270
    [19] Koh TJW, Ling AHZ, Chiang CLL, et al. (2021) Attitudes towards COVID-19 precautionary measures and willingness to work during an outbreak among medical students in Singapore: A mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ 21: 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02762-0
    [20] Martin A, Blom IM, Whyatt G, et al. (2022) A rapid systematic review exploring the involvement of medical students in pandemics and other global health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 16: 360-372. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.315
    [21] Kamkamidze T, Bregadze N, Jobava T, et al. (2022) Awareness and attitude towards COVID-19 among students of medical universities in Tbilisi, Georgia. Georgian Med News : 75-80.
    [22] Tan WW, Lin GSS (2023) Dental students' perspectives and learning experiences during the COVID-19 outbreak: A qualitative study. Siriraj Med J 75: 592-598. https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i8.262661
    [23] McFadden S, Guille S, Daly-Lynn J, et al. (2022) Academic, clinical and personal experiences of undergraduate healthcare students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 17: e0271873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271873
    [24] He L, Dela Cruz JRA (2024) Effects of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work readiness of undergraduate nursing students in China: A mixed-methods study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 17: 559-572. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S448965
    [25] Lochmannová A (2025) Exploring the role of virtual reality in preparing emergency responders for mass casualty incidents. Isr J Health Policy Res 14: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00681-9
    [26] Binsuwaidan R, Altwaijry NA, Ibrahim AA, et al. (2025) Insights into simulation-based learning: Student and faculty experiences in a PharmD program in Saudi Arabia. BMC Med Educ 25: 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06723-9
    [27] Interprofessional Education Collaborative (2023) Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Version 3. [cited 2026 March 08]. Available from: https://ipec.memberclicks.net/assets/core-competencies/IPEC_Core_Competencies_Version_3_2023.pdf
    [28] Magdaş TM, Jolobai AN, Simonescu-Colan R, et al. (2022) Practical experience as a determining factor of preparedness of medical and nursing students in Romania during COVID-19 pandemic. Med Pharm Rep 95: 54-58. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1963
    [29] Goodall R, Matejin E, Fabri S, et al. (2024) Medical students: A potentially sustainable solution for our workforce crisis and future reforms in health care. Med J Aust 220: 176-179. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52200
    [30] Ilesanmi OS, Olabumuyi OO, Afolabi AA (2020) Mobilizing medical students for improved COVID-19 response in Nigeria: A stop gap in human resources for health. Glob Biosecur 2: 1. https://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.89
    [31] Ashcroft J, Byrne MHV, Brennan PA, et al. (2020) Preparing medical students for a pandemic: A systematic review of student disaster training programmes. Postgrad Med J 97: 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137906
    [32] Subramaniam T, Aznal SSS, Ikram MA (2024) Evolution of clinical simulation training and pandemic-led acceleration: The International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia journey. Med Sci Educ 34: 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01916-7
  • publichealth-13-03-044-s001.pdf
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Metrics

Article views(871) PDF downloads(58) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog