Research article

Rural-urban classification is associated with patient- and population-level disparities in leukemia relative to other pediatric cancers

  • Published: 15 April 2026
  • Background 

    Despite leukemia being the most commonly diagnosed form of pediatric cancer, prior surveillance research has not linked the odds of a given pediatric cancer being leukemia to rural–urban county designations.

    Purpose 

    We sought to elucidate the patient-level role of rural–urban county designations in predicting the odds of a given pediatric cancer diagnosis being leukemia while observing the role of these county designations in conveying leukemia/non-leukemia disparities in the U.S. pediatric cancer population.

    Methods 

    The sample included pediatric cancer diagnoses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 21 dataset from 2010 through 2017. The study outcome was binary; cases were leukemia and controls were non-leukemia. The focal predictor was the rural–urban county designation. The analysis used patient- and community-level covariates in a logistic regression model to identify the role of rural–urban designations in predicting a leukemia diagnosis. The model also generated case scores, which were the population probabilities of diagnoses being leukemia, and used these to conduct mediation analyses to determine the population-average associations of the rural–urban designations with leukemia.

    Results 

    In the adjusted model, rural counties adjacent to metropolitan areas (henceforth, “metros”) had a significant association with leukemia cases, with 29.4% greater odds compared to the largest metro counties. In the population-level mediation via case scores, not only rural counties adjacent to metros, but also medium and small metros, had greater population-average odds of leukemia compared to the largest metros.

    Conclusions 

    While only rural counties adjacent to metros were consequential for modeling leukemia diagnoses among patients, population-average disparities in leukemia odds were also apparent in small and medium metros compared to the largest metros. This may indicate that leukemia risk exposures, existing systematically in rural counties adjacent to metros, may also be present, to lesser extents, in the small and medium metros.

    Citation: Benjamin N. Vickers, April R. Jimenez, Kristin S. Bogda, Elizabeth Y. Jimenez, Tracie C. Collins. Rural-urban classification is associated with patient- and population-level disparities in leukemia relative to other pediatric cancers[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2026, 13(2): 472-484. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2026025

    Related Papers:

  • Background 

    Despite leukemia being the most commonly diagnosed form of pediatric cancer, prior surveillance research has not linked the odds of a given pediatric cancer being leukemia to rural–urban county designations.

    Purpose 

    We sought to elucidate the patient-level role of rural–urban county designations in predicting the odds of a given pediatric cancer diagnosis being leukemia while observing the role of these county designations in conveying leukemia/non-leukemia disparities in the U.S. pediatric cancer population.

    Methods 

    The sample included pediatric cancer diagnoses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 21 dataset from 2010 through 2017. The study outcome was binary; cases were leukemia and controls were non-leukemia. The focal predictor was the rural–urban county designation. The analysis used patient- and community-level covariates in a logistic regression model to identify the role of rural–urban designations in predicting a leukemia diagnosis. The model also generated case scores, which were the population probabilities of diagnoses being leukemia, and used these to conduct mediation analyses to determine the population-average associations of the rural–urban designations with leukemia.

    Results 

    In the adjusted model, rural counties adjacent to metropolitan areas (henceforth, “metros”) had a significant association with leukemia cases, with 29.4% greater odds compared to the largest metro counties. In the population-level mediation via case scores, not only rural counties adjacent to metros, but also medium and small metros, had greater population-average odds of leukemia compared to the largest metros.

    Conclusions 

    While only rural counties adjacent to metros were consequential for modeling leukemia diagnoses among patients, population-average disparities in leukemia odds were also apparent in small and medium metros compared to the largest metros. This may indicate that leukemia risk exposures, existing systematically in rural counties adjacent to metros, may also be present, to lesser extents, in the small and medium metros.



    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    †Note: The 21 sources for the SEER 21 dataset included the Alaska Native Tumor Registry, Connecticut, Detroit, Atlanta, Greater Georgia, Rural Georgia, San Francisco-Oakland, San Jose-Monterey, Greater California, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Los Angeles, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, Seattle-Puget Sound, and Utah. https://seer.cancer.gov/registries/terms.html.

    Authors' contributions



    B.V. was involved with conception, data acquisition, study methods, analysis, and manuscript development. A.J. and K.B. were involved with conception and manuscript development. E.J. and T.C. were involved with study methods and manuscript development.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Ward E, DeSantis C, Robbins A, et al. (2014) Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64: 83-103. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21219
    [2] Thompson JR, Gerald PF, Willoughby ML, et al. (2001) Maternal folate supplementation in pregnancy and protection against acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: a case-control study. Lancet 358: 1935-1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06959-8
    [3] Belson M, Kingsley B, Holmes A (2007) Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review. Environ Health Perspect 115: 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9023
    [4] Holman DM, Buchanan ND (2016) Opportunities during early life for cancer prevention: highlights from a series of virtual meetings with experts. Pediatrics 138: S3-S14. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4268C
    [5] Khabarova O, Pinaev SK, Chakov VV, et al. (2024) Trends in childhood leukemia incidence in urban countries and their relation to environmental factors, including space weather. Front Public Health 12: 1295643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1295643
    [6] Metayer C, Dahl G, Wiemels J, et al. (2016) Childhood leukemia: a preventable disease. Pediatrics 138: S45-S55. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4268H
    [7] Shekhar C, Khosya R, Thakur K, et al. (2024) A systematic review of pesticide exposure, associated risks, and long-term human health impacts. Toxicol Rep 13: 101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101840
    [8] Kilpatrick DJ, Hung P, Crouch E, et al. (2024) Geographic variations in urban-rural particulate matter (PM2. 5) concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019. GeoHealth 8: e2023GH000920. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GH000920
    [9] Adelman AS, McLaughlin CC, Wu XC, et al. (2005) Urbanisation and incidence of acute lymphocytic leukaemia among United States children aged 0–4. Br J Cancer 92: 2084-2088. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602607
    [10] Ahmed S, Ahmad E, Ashraf H, et al. (2025) Trends and disparities in acute lymphoblastic leukemia–related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020: insights from the centers for disease control and prevention wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research database. Am J Clin Oncol 48: 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001162
    [11] Fujita TC, Sousa-Pereira N, Amarante MK, et al. (2021) Acute lymphoid leukemia etiopathogenesis. Mol Biol Rep 48: 817-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-06073-3
    [12] National Cancer InstituteAge and Cancer Risk (2025). [cited 2025 November 06]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age
    [13] Ruhl J, Adamo M, Dickie L, et al. (2024) Hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasm coding manual. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. [cited 2025 November 06]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/tools/heme/Hematopoietic_Instructions_and_Rules.pdf
    [14] Statistics KingdomRegression and ANOVA – sample size calculator (2025). [cited Y2025 November 06]. Available from: https://www.statskingdom.com/sample_size_regression.html
    [15] Gatsonis C, Sampson AR (1989) Multiple correlation: exact power and sample size calculations. Psychol Bull 106: 516-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.516
    [16] U.S. Department of AgricultureRural-Urban Continuum Codes (2025). [cited 2025 November 06]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/
    [17] Meilleur A, Subramanian SV, Plascak JJ, et al. (2013) Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: issues and challenges. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22: 1657-1667. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0404
    [18] VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2009) Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and compositions. Stat Interface 2: 457-468. https://doi.org/10.4310/SII.2009.v2.n4.a7
    [19] VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2010) Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. Am J Epidemiol 172: 1339-1348. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq332
    [20] Valeri L, VanderWeele TJ (2013) Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods 18: 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031034
    [21] VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB (2019) Some desirable properties of the Bonferroni correction: is the Bonferroni correction really so bad?. Am J Epidemiol 188: 617-618. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy250
    [22] Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, et al. (2017) Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26: 992-997. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092
    [23] Modglin L Leukemia Age Ranges: Risk and Survival Rates (2023). [cited 2025 November 06]. Available from: https://www.patientpower.info/leukemia/leukemia-age-range
    [24] Cruz JL, Luke DA, Ceballos RM, et al. (2025) Reconceptualizing rurality: exploring community capital to identify distinct rural classes in the United States. SSM Popul Health 29: 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101729
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(138) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog