Research article

A sex-specific difference in smartphone addiction, physical activity level, and cognitive functions among university students

  • Published: 27 March 2026
  • This study aimed to investigate the sex-specific differences in smartphone addiction, physical activity levels, and cognitive functions among university students. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 256 university students aged 18–25. Participants completed questionnaires using the Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version to assess their level of smartphone addiction. The working memory and selective attention domains of cognitive function were evaluated, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to determine participants' self-reported physical activity levels. The results revealed significant sex differences, with male students exhibiting higher levels of smartphone addiction (male = 46.42 ± 9.37; female = 38.27 ± 7.63) and greater physical activity (male = 3752 ± 1876; female = 3447 ± 1748) than their female counterparts. Additionally, female students demonstrated superior performance on selective attention tasks, including reaction time (female = 463.00 ± 50.53; male = 457.34 ± 59.31) and accuracy (female = 92.26 ± 6.53; male = 89.60 ± 8.39) across varied conditions, whereas no significant sex differences were observed in working memory or overall reaction time. These findings suggest that sex-specific factors may influence differences between male and female participants in smartphone use, cognitive function, and physical activity.

    Citation: Turki Abualait, Mohammad Ahsan. A sex-specific difference in smartphone addiction, physical activity level, and cognitive functions among university students[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2026, 13(2): 409-421. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2026021

    Related Papers:

  • This study aimed to investigate the sex-specific differences in smartphone addiction, physical activity levels, and cognitive functions among university students. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 256 university students aged 18–25. Participants completed questionnaires using the Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version to assess their level of smartphone addiction. The working memory and selective attention domains of cognitive function were evaluated, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to determine participants' self-reported physical activity levels. The results revealed significant sex differences, with male students exhibiting higher levels of smartphone addiction (male = 46.42 ± 9.37; female = 38.27 ± 7.63) and greater physical activity (male = 3752 ± 1876; female = 3447 ± 1748) than their female counterparts. Additionally, female students demonstrated superior performance on selective attention tasks, including reaction time (female = 463.00 ± 50.53; male = 457.34 ± 59.31) and accuracy (female = 92.26 ± 6.53; male = 89.60 ± 8.39) across varied conditions, whereas no significant sex differences were observed in working memory or overall reaction time. These findings suggest that sex-specific factors may influence differences between male and female participants in smartphone use, cognitive function, and physical activity.



    加载中


    Authors' contributions



    All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Conflict of interest



    There is no conflict of interest.

    [1] Li Y, Li G, Liu L, et al. (2020) Correlations between mobile phone addiction and anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and poor sleep quality among college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict 9: 551-571. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00057
    [2] Paterna A, Alcaraz-Ibáñez M, Aguilar-Parra JM, et al. (2024) Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict 13: 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014
    [3] Leow MQH, Chiang J, Chua TJX, et al. (2023) The relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep among medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 18: e0290724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290724
    [4] Blaak H, Lkoul A, Iziki H, et al. (2025) Satisfaction and Self-Confidence of Moroccan Nursing Students in Simulation-Based Learning and Their Associations with Simulation Design Characteristics and Educational Practices. Nurs Reports (Pavia, Italy) 15: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050138
    [5] Song A, Song G, Wang H, et al. (2023) Prevalence of mobile phone addiction among medical students: a systematic review. Am J Transl Res 15: 2985-2998.
    [6] Nikolic A, Bukurov B, Kocic I, et al. (2023) Smartphone addiction, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, and stress among medical students. Front Public Heal 11: 1252371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252371
    [7] Plackett R, Blyth A, Schartau P (2023) The impact of social media use interventions on mental well-being: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res 25: e44922. https://doi.org/10.2196/44922
    [8] Surawska M (2017) Sport activity as a significant element of preventing addictions. Polish J Appl Sci 2: 112-116. https://doi.org/10.19260/PJAS.2016.2.3.05
    [9] Liu H, Soh KG, Samsudin S, et al. (2022) Effects of exercise and psychological interventions on smartphone addiction among university students: A systematic review. Front Psychol 13: 1021285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021285
    [10] Pirwani N, Szabo A (2024) Could physical activity alleviate smartphone addiction in university students? A systematic literature review. Prev Med Reports 42: 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102744
    [11] Yan Y, Qin X, Liu L, et al. (2025) Effects of exercise interventions on Internet addiction among college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Addict Behav 160: 108159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108159
    [12] Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA, et al. (2015) The brain in your pocket: Evidence that Smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Comput Human Behav 48: 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029
    [13] Uncapher MR, Lin L, Rosen LD, et al. (2017) Media multitasking and cognitive, psychological, neural, and learning differences. Pediatrics 140: S62-S66. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758D
    [14] Qudah MF Al, Albursan IS, Bakhiet SFA, et al. (2019) Smartphone addiction and its relationship with cyberbullying among university students. Int J Ment Health Addict 17: 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0013-7
    [15] Zhao H, Rafik-Galea S, Fitriana M, et al. (2022) Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale—Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students. PLoS One 17: e0278092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278092
    [16] Kuş M (2025) A meta-analysis of the impact of technology related factors on students' academic performance. Front Psychol 16: 1524645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1524645
    [17] Zhang T, Gong N, Jia R, et al. (2021) Stroop effect in smartphone addiction among college students. Medicine (Baltimore) 100: e26741. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026741
    [18] Przepiorka A, Błachnio A, Cudo A, et al. (2021) Social anxiety and social skills via problematic smartphone use for predicting somatic symptoms and academic performance at primary school. Comput Educ 173: 104286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104286
    [19] Su W, Han X, Jin C, et al. (2019) Are males more likely to be addicted to the internet than females? A meta-analysis involving 34 global jurisdictions. Comput Human Behav 99: 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.021
    [20] Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, et al. (2013) The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 8: 083558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
    [21] Piper BJ, Mueller ST, Geerken AR, et al. (2015) Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the psychology experimental building language test battery in young adults. PeerJ 12: 1460. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460
    [22] Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-Country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 1381-1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
    [23] Zhong Y, Ma H, Liang YF, et al. (2022) Prevalence of smartphone addiction among Asian medical students: A meta-analysis of multinational observational studies. Int J Soc Psychiatry 68: 1171-1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221089535
    [24] Taywade A, Khubalkar R (2019) Gender differences in smartphone usage patterns of adolescents. Int J Indian Psychol 7: 516-523. https://doi.org/10.25215/0704.060
    [25] Sun B, Mao H, Yin C (2020) Male and female users' differences in online technology community based on text mining. Front Psychol 11: 806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00806
    [26] Lin X, Gu JY, Guo WJ, et al. (2021) The gender-sensitive social risk factors for internet addiction in college undergraduate students. Psychiatry Investig 18: 636-644. https://doi.org/10.30773/PI.2020.0277
    [27] Wan X, Huang H, Jia R, et al. (2022) Association between mobile phone addiction and social support among mainland Chinese teenagers: A meta-analysis. Front Public Heal 10: 911560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.911560
    [28] Alimoradi Z, Lotfi A, Lin CY, et al. (2022) Estimation of behavioral addiction prevalence during covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Addict Reports 9: 486-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-022-00435-6
    [29] Zheng X, Yang Y, Jiang W, et al. (2023) Nonconforming gender expression and associated problematic smartphone and internet use among Chinese adolescents. J Behav Addict 12: 817-826. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00040
    [30] Müller SM, Antons S, Wegmann E, et al. (2023) A systematic review and meta-analysis of risky decision-making in specific domains of problematic use of the internet: Evidence across different decision-making tasks. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 152: 105271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105271
    [31] Selvam IJ (2024) Cardiology and neurophysiological stimulation of internet gaming disorders: A systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev 20: e210624231164. https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X295560240530104352
    [32] Ioannidis K, Hook R, Goudriaan AE, et al. (2019) Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: meta-analysis of 40 studies. Br J Psychiatry 215: 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.3
    [33] Elhai JD, Rozgonjuk D, Alghraibeh AM, et al. (2020) Excessive reassurance seeking mediates relations between rumination and problematic smartphone use. Bull Menninger Clin 84: 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc_2020_84_07
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(382) PDF downloads(26) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog