Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a molecular technique that has transformed clinical diagnostics by enabling the amplification and quantification of specific nucleic acid sequences with high sensitivity, specificity, and speed. This approach supports the detection of pathogens, genetic mutations, and biomarkers across clinical samples. qPCR is widely employed in fields, such as infectious diseases, oncology, parasitology, and medical genetics, playing a pivotal role in the rapid identification of infectious agents, including those responsible for COVID-19, tuberculosis, leprosy, leishmaniasis, and arboviral infections. Compared with conventional diagnostic methods, qPCR offers substantial advantages, including reduced turnaround times, increased analytical accuracy, and compatibility with automated workflows. Recent technological innovations, including portable thermocyclers, simplified workflows, and ready-to-use commercial kits, along with integration into digital platforms, have expanded the applicability of qPCR to low-infrastructure environments and point-of-care settings. Despite these advances, the technique faces challenges, such as high costs of equipment and reagents, reliance on trained personnel, and susceptibility to inhibition by sample-derived compounds. Nevertheless, the adoption of standardized guidelines, such as Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) and Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD), has strengthened the reproducibility and reliability of qPCR in clinical research. Future perspectives suggest an increasing role for qPCR in personalized medicine, epidemiological surveillance, and decentralized diagnostic strategies, further consolidating its importance in clinical practice and global public health. Its combined sensitivity, specificity, and adaptability will continue to drive innovation in molecular diagnostics.
Citation: Tuany Rodrigues, Bruna Gabriele de Moura, Giovanna Tatarem Coelho de Miranda, Camila Leitzke Toledo, Luma Fernandes Bravo, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa. Application of qPCR testing in clinical diagnostics: A brief review of its history, challenges and perspectives[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2026, 13(2): 180-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2026010
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a molecular technique that has transformed clinical diagnostics by enabling the amplification and quantification of specific nucleic acid sequences with high sensitivity, specificity, and speed. This approach supports the detection of pathogens, genetic mutations, and biomarkers across clinical samples. qPCR is widely employed in fields, such as infectious diseases, oncology, parasitology, and medical genetics, playing a pivotal role in the rapid identification of infectious agents, including those responsible for COVID-19, tuberculosis, leprosy, leishmaniasis, and arboviral infections. Compared with conventional diagnostic methods, qPCR offers substantial advantages, including reduced turnaround times, increased analytical accuracy, and compatibility with automated workflows. Recent technological innovations, including portable thermocyclers, simplified workflows, and ready-to-use commercial kits, along with integration into digital platforms, have expanded the applicability of qPCR to low-infrastructure environments and point-of-care settings. Despite these advances, the technique faces challenges, such as high costs of equipment and reagents, reliance on trained personnel, and susceptibility to inhibition by sample-derived compounds. Nevertheless, the adoption of standardized guidelines, such as Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) and Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD), has strengthened the reproducibility and reliability of qPCR in clinical research. Future perspectives suggest an increasing role for qPCR in personalized medicine, epidemiological surveillance, and decentralized diagnostic strategies, further consolidating its importance in clinical practice and global public health. Its combined sensitivity, specificity, and adaptability will continue to drive innovation in molecular diagnostics.
| [1] | Caliendo AM, Gilbert DN, Ginocchio CC, et al. (2013) Better Tests, Better Care: Improved Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases . Volume 57, Issue suppl_3, December 2013, Pages S139–S170. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit578 |
| [2] |
Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 155: 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6 
|
| [3] |
Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Stone NJ (1977) Genetics of the LDL receptor: Evidence that the mutations affecting binding and internalization are allelic. Cell 12: 629-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(77)90263-x
|
| [4] |
Mullis K, Faloona F, Scharf S, et al. (1986) Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: The polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 51: 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1986.051.01.03
|
| [5] |
Liu Q, Jin X, Cheng J, et al. (2023) Advances in the application of molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of infectious disease pathogens (Review). Mol Med Rep 27: 104. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.12991
|
| [6] |
Bustin SA (2017) How to speed up the polymerase chain reaction. Biomol Detect Quantif 12: 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.05.002
|
| [7] |
Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, et al. (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487-491. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2448875
|
| [8] |
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. (2009) The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55: 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
|
| [9] |
Wittwer CT, Herrmann MG, Moss AA, et al. (1997) Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques 22: 130-138. https://doi.org/10.2144/97221bi01
|
| [10] |
Bustin SA, Ruijter JM, van den Hoff MJB, et al. (2025) MIQE 2.0: Revision of the minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments guidelines. Clin Chem 71: 634-651. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf043
|
| [11] |
Kubista M, Andrade JM, Bengtsson M, et al. (2006) The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med 27: 95-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007
|
| [12] | Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. (2020) Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 25: 2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 |
| [13] |
Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, et al. (1993) Kinetic PCR analysis: Real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Nat Biotechnol 11: 1026-1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0993-1026
|
| [14] |
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, et al. (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6: 986-994. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6.10.986
|
| [15] |
Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1999) Digital PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9236-9241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.9236
|
| [16] |
Hou Y, Chen S, Zheng Y, et al. (2023) Droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR) and its applications. TrAC Trend Anal Chem 158: 116897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116897
|
| [17] |
Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, et al. (2013) Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods 10: 1003-1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2633
|
| [18] |
Kopylova KV, Kasparov EW, Marchenko IV, et al. (2023) Digital PCR as a highly sensitive diagnostic tool: A review. Mol Biol 57: 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893323050059
|
| [19] |
Mullis KB (1990) The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Sci Am 262: 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0490-56
|
| [20] |
Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, et al. (1991) Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′----3′ exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 7276-7280. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.16.7276
|
| [21] |
Hawkins SFC, Guest PC (2017) Multiplex analyses using real-time quantitative PCR. Multiplex biomarker techniques . New York: Humana 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6730-8_8
|
| [22] | Tatipally S, Srikantam A, Kasetty S (2018) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a potential point of care laboratory test for leprosy diagnosis—A systematic review. Trop Med Infect Dis 3: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3040107 |
| [23] |
Espy MJ, Uhl JR, Sloan LM, et al. (2006) Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: Applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 165-256. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.1.165-256.2006
|
| [24] |
Mackay IM, Arden KE, Nitsche A (2002) Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1292-1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.6.1292
|
| [25] |
Yin J, Tong J, Li J, et al. (2023) A portable, high-throughput real-time quantitative PCR device for point-of-care testing. Anal Biochem 674: 115200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2023.115200
|
| [26] |
Jung W, Han J, Choi JW, et al. (2015) Point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnostic systems using microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies. Microelectron Eng 132: 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.09.024
|
| [27] |
Urdea M, Penny LA, Olmsted SS, et al. (2006) Requirements for high impact diagnostics in the developing world. Nature 444: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05448
|
| [28] |
Rajan A, Glorikian H (2009) Point-of-care diagnostics: Market trends and growth drivers. Expert Opin Med Diagn 3: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1517/17530050802651579
|
| [29] | De Sarabia Rosado Pedro Manuel F, Gemma LL, Antonio MS, et al. (2002) Method for preparing stabilised reaction mixtures, which are totally or partially dried, comprising at least one enzyme, reaction mixtures and kits containing said mixtures. Patent WO02072002A3 . |
| [30] | Costa ADT, Amadei SS, Bertão-Santos A, et al. (2022) Ready-to-use qPCR for detection of DNA from Trypanosoma cruzi or other pathogenic organisms. J Vis Exp 179: e63316. https://doi.org/10.3791/63316 |
| [31] |
Costa ADT, Jacomasso T, Mattos EC, et al. (2021) Ready-to-use qPCR for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis or Trypanosoma cruzi in food matrices. Food Waterborne Parasitol 22: e00111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00111
|
| [32] |
Sun Y, Høgberg J, Christine T, et al. (2013) Pre-storage of gelified reagents in a lab-on-a-foil system for rapid nucleic acid analysis. Lab Chip 13: 1509-1514. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc41386h
|
| [33] |
Iglesias N, Subirats M, Trevisi P, et al. (2014) Performance of a new gelled nested PCR test for the diagnosis of imported malaria: Comparison with microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, and real-time PCR. Parasitol Res 113: 2587-2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3911-z
|
| [34] |
Kermekchiev MB, Kirilova LI, Vail EE, et al. (2009) Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e40. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1055
|
| [35] |
Al-Soud WA, Rådström P (2001) Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol 39: 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.2.485-493.2001
|
| [36] |
Abu Al-Soud W, Rådström P (2000) Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat. J Clin Microbiol 38: 4463-4470. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.12.4463-4470.2000
|
| [37] |
Perego RA, Cairoli R, Cornacchini G, et al. (2005) The role of quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the management of follicular lymphoma patients. Tumori 91: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089160509100111
|
| [38] | Lee MS, Cabanillas F (2003) Monitoring follicular lymphoma by polymerase chain reaction. Leukemia and lymphoma . Totowa, NJ: Humana Press 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-318-7_14 |
| [39] |
Lo YM, Zhang J, Leung TN, et al. (1999) Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet 64: 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1086/302205
|
| [40] |
González-Sánchez LE, Ortega-Camarillo C, Contreras-Ramos A, et al. (2021) miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. J Diabetes 13: 792-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13166
|
| [41] |
Koutsi A, Vervesou EC (2018) Diagnostic molecular techniques in haematology: Recent advances. Ann Transl Med 6: 242. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.05.30
|
| [42] |
Budhbaware T, Rathored J, Shende S (2024) Molecular methods in cancer diagnostics: A short review. Ann Med 56: 2353893. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2353893
|
| [43] | Yao J, (Jim) Zhai Q (2022) A narrative review of cancer molecular diagnostics: Past, present, and future. J BioX Res 5: 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1097/JBR.0000000000000136 |
| [44] |
Schijman AG, Bisio M, Orellana L, et al. (2011) International study to evaluate PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000931
|
| [45] |
Duffy T, Bisio M, Altcheh J, et al. (2009) Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000419
|
| [46] |
Piron M, Fisa R, Casamitjana N, et al. (2007) Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop 103: 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.05.019
|
| [47] |
Ramirez JC, Moreira OC (2026) Quantitative real-time PCR for Trypanosoma cruzi infection diagnosis and treatment response monitoring of patients with chagas disease. T. cruzi infection . New York: Humana 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4848-3_11
|
| [48] |
Rampazzo RCP, Graziani AC, Leite KK, et al. (2019) Proof of concept for a portable platform for molecular diagnosis of tropical diseases. J Mol Diagn 21: 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.04.008
|
| [49] |
Kamau E, Alemayehu S, Feghali KC, et al. (2013) Multiplex qPCR for detection and absolute quantification of malaria. PLoS One 8: e71539. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071539
|
| [50] |
Truong M, Šlapeta J (2023) Analytical sensitivity of a multiplex quantitative PCR for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum. Parasitol Res 122: 1043-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07796-5
|
| [51] |
Lin MH, Chen TC, Kuo TT, et al. (2000) Real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol 38: 4121-4125. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.38.11.4121-4125.2000
|
| [52] |
Wu Y, Tian X, Song N, et al. (2020) Application of quantitative PCR in the diagnosis and evaluating treatment efficacy of Leishmaniasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10: 581639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.581639
|
| [53] |
Jara M, Adaui V, Valencia BM, et al. (2013) Real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Leishmania (Viannia) organisms in skin and mucosal lesions: Exploratory study of parasite load and clinical parameters. J Clin Microbiol 51: 1826-1833. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00208-13
|
| [54] |
Latrofa MS, Cereda M, Louzada-Flores VN, et al. (2024) Q3 lab-on-chip real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs. J Clin Microbiol 62: e0010424. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00104-24
|
| [55] |
Martinez AN, Britto CFPC, Nery JAC, et al. (2006) Evaluation of real-time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3154-3159. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02250-05
|
| [56] |
Souza e Silva BO, Araújo e Silva AC, Tolentino Júnior DS, et al. (2025) Accuracy of the qPCR method in intradermal scraping samples from individuals with suspected leprosy in a Brazilian macroregion. Sci Rep 15: 12537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97714-9
|
| [57] |
Diana D, Harish MC (2024) qPCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in urine samples of leprosy patients using the Rlep gene target. Front Mol Biosci 11: 1435679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1435679
|
| [58] |
de Neves Manta FS, Jacomasso T, de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo R, et al. (2022) Development and validation of a multiplex real-time qPCR assay using GMP-grade reagents for leprosy diagnosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 16: e0009850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009850
|
| [59] |
de Neves Manta FS, Leal-Calvo T, Moreira SJM, et al. (2020) Ultra-sensitive detection of Mycobacterium leprae: DNA extraction and PCR assays. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14: e0008325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008325
|
| [60] |
Ma J, Wang L, Zheng X, et al. (2025) Evaluating a dual-gene qPCR melting curve assay for rapid detection of tuberculosis in suspected pulmonary cases. Infect Drug Resist 18: 1135-1147. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S498180
|
| [61] |
Chen J, Chen C, Xie Y, et al. (2025) Clinical value of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of suspected mycobacterial pulmonary infections. BMC Infect Dis 25: 1476. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11935-x
|
| [62] |
Ari O, Durmaz R, Vezir S, et al. (2025) Development of a multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance. Curr Microbiol 82: 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04196-z
|
| [63] |
Han Z, Ou X, Zhang R, et al. (2025) A duplex one-step recombinase aided PCR assay for the rapid and sensitive detection of the isoniazid resistance genes katG and inhA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front Microbiol 16: 1548965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1548965
|
| [64] |
Vasiliu A, Carratala-Castro L, Seeger A, et al. (2025) Performance of a novel stool quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for pediatric tuberculosis detection in sub-Saharan Africa. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 14: piaf045. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piaf045
|
| [65] | Liu J, Yi Y, Chen W, et al. (2015) Development and evaluation of the quantitative real-time PCR assay in detection and typing of herpes simplex virus in swab specimens from patients with genital herpes. Int J Clin Exp Med 8: 18758-18764. |
| [66] |
Pabbaraju K, Wong S, Gill K, et al. (2016) Simultaneous detection of Zika, Chikungunya and Dengue viruses by a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay. J Clin Virol 83: 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.001
|
| [67] |
Waggoner JJ, Abeynayake J, Sahoo MK, et al. (2013) Single-reaction, multiplex, real-time RT-PCR for the detection, quantitation, and serotyping of dengue viruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7: e2116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002116
|
| [68] |
Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, et al. (2008) Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1232-1239. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1408.080287
|
| [69] |
de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo R, Zambenedetti MR, Alexandrino F, et al. (2022) Development, verification, and validation of an RT-qPCR-based protocol for Yellow Fever diagnosis. Int J Infect Dis 119: 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.361
|
| [70] |
Presser LD, Coffin J, Koivogui L, et al. (2021) The deployment of mobile diagnostic laboratories for Ebola virus disease diagnostics in Sierra Leone and Guinea. Afr J Lab Med 10: 1414. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1414
|
| [71] |
Broadhurst MJ, Brooks TJG, Pollock NR (2016) Diagnosis of Ebola virus disease: Past, present, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 29: 773-793. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00003-16
|
| [72] |
Lu X, Whitaker B, Sakthivel SKK, et al. (2014) Real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay panel for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 52: 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02533-13
|
| [73] |
Thirion L, Charrel RN, Boehmann Y, et al. (2019) Development and evaluation of a Duo Zaire ebolavirus real-time RT-PCR assay targeting two regions within the genome. Microorganisms 7: 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120652
|
| [74] | Prakash S, Bharti S, Aasarey R, et al. (2025) Bridging the diagnosticgap: A rapid, cost-effective, and equitable hepatitis C virus RNA detection method for resource-limited settings. Cureus 17: e92101. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92101 |
| [75] |
Enouf V, Dos Reis G, Guthmann JP, et al. (2006) Validation of single real-time TaqMan® PCR assay for the detection and quantitation of four major genotypes of hepatitis E virus in clinical specimens. J Med Virol 78: 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20665
|
| [76] |
Kozak RA, Rutherford C, Richard-Greenblatt M, et al. (2022) Development and evaluation of a molecular hepatitis A virus assay for serum and stool specimens. Viruses 14: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010159
|
| [77] |
Green ML, Leisenring W, Stachel D, et al. (2012) Efficacy of a viral load-based, risk-adapted, preemptive treatment strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18: 1687-1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.015
|
| [78] |
van der Velden WJFM, Mori T, Stevens WBC, et al. (2013) Reduced PTLD-related mortality in patients experiencing EBV infection following allo-SCT after the introduction of a protocol incorporating pre-emptive rituximab. Bone Marrow Transplant 48: 1465-1471. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.84
|
| [79] |
Allicock OM, Yolda-Carr D, Earnest R, et al. (2023) Method versatility in RNA extraction-free PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva samples. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 182: 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.06.004
|
| [80] |
Bustin SA, Shipley GL, Kirvell S, et al. (2022) RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2: No need for a dedicated reverse transcription step. Int J Mol Sci 23: 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031303
|
| [81] |
Tene SD, Diouara AAM, Sané S, et al. (2025) Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in the context of the one health approach: A systematic review. Pathogens 14: 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14070704
|
| [82] |
Santos-Silva S, Gonçalves HMR, Van der Poel WHM, et al. (2025) Rat hepatitis E virus (Rocahepevirus ratti): A systematic review of its presence in water, food-related matrices, and potential risks to human health. Foods 14: 2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142533
|
| [83] |
Dong Y, Song J, Li S, et al. (2025) Development and comparative evaluation of LAMP, nested PCR and Real-time PCR assays for detecting Fusarium tricinctum, a fungal pathogen of Zanthoxylum bungeanum. BMC Microbiol 25: 568. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04295-8
|
| [84] |
Tavares ER, Santos VP, Castro IM de, et al. (2025) Development of melting-curve-based real-time PCR for differentiating medically important Candida species. Int J Mol Sci 26: 9411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199411
|
| [85] | Graciele-Melo C, Rocha-Silva F, Pereira CP, et al. Use of polymerase chain reaction for cryptococcus neoformans genome detection in cerebrospinal fluid for neurocryptococcosis diagnosis (2016). |
| [86] |
Rath PM, Steinmann J (2018) Overview of commercially available PCR assays for the detection of Aspergillus spp. DNA in patient samples. Front Microbiol 9: 740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00740
|
| [87] |
Cacciò SM, Ryan U (2008) Molecular epidemiology of giardiasis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 160: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.04.006
|
| [88] |
Verweij JJ, Stensvold CR (2014) Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 27: 371-418. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00122-13
|
| [89] |
Verweij JJ, Blangé RA, Templeton K, et al. (2004) Simultaneous detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum in fecal samples by using multiplex real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42: 1220-1223. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.3.1220-1223.2004
|
| [90] |
van Lieshout L, Verweij JJ (2010) Newer diagnostic approaches to intestinal protozoa. Curr Opin Infect Dis 23: 488-493. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32833de0eb
|
| [91] |
Suita F, Lizana V, Aguiló-Gisbert J, et al. (2025) Molecular and serological detection of Leishmania spp. in mediterranean wild carnivores and feral cats: Implications for wildlife health and one health surveillance. Animals 15: 2751. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15182751
|
| [92] |
Robert-Gangneux F, Duval X, Cazala C, et al. (2025) Improvement of the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa using a multiplex qPCR strategy compared to classical microscopy: A prospective study on 3,500 stool samples over 3 years. J Clin Microbiol 63: e0161024. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01610-24
|
| [93] |
Burd EM (2010) Validation of laboratory-developed molecular assays for infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 550-576. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00074-09
|
| [94] |
Wissel M, Poirier M, Satterwhite C, et al. (2022) Recommendations on qPCR/ddPCR assay validation by GCC. Bioanalysis 14: 853-863. 10.4155/bio-2022-0109.
|
| [95] |
Tahir MF, Ishtiaq S, Anas M, et al. (2025) Integrating biotechnology into diagnostic labs: Innovations in PCR and molecular procedures. Curr Res Biotechnol 10: 100325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2025.100325
|
| [96] |
Germer JJ, Zein NN (2001) Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications. Mayo Clin Proc 76: 911-920. https://doi.org/10.4065/76.9.911
|
| [97] |
Chakraborty S (2024) Democratizing nucleic acid-based molecular diagnostic tests for infectious diseases at resource-limited settings – from point of care to extreme point of care. Sens Diagn 3: 536-561. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sd00304c
|
| [98] |
Parida MM (2008) Rapid and real-time detection technologies for emerging viruses of biomedical importance. J Biosci 33: 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-008-0079-7
|
| [99] |
Ofori B, Twum S, Yeboah SN, et al. (2024) Towards the development of cost-effective point-of-care diagnostic tools for poverty-related infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. PeerJ 12: e17198. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17198
|
| [100] |
Qu S, Shi Q, Zhou L, et al. (2010) Ambient stable quantitative PCR reagents for the detection of Yersinia pestis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000629
|
| [101] |
de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo R, da Silva Solcà M, Santos LCS, et al. (2017) Validation of the performance qPCR to detect Leishmania infantum DNA in naturally infected dogs. Vet Parasitol 246: 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.009
|
| [102] |
Xu J, Wang J, Su X, et al. (2021) Transferable, easy-to-use and room-temperature-storable PCR mixes for microfluidic molecular diagnostics. Talanta 235: 122797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122797
|
| [103] |
Reinicke M, Diezel C, Teimoori S, et al. (2025) Rapid simultaneous detection of the clinically relevant carbapenemase resistance genes blaKPC, blaOXA48, blaVIM and blaNDM with the newly developed ready-to-use qPCR CarbaScan LyoBead. Int J Mol Sci 26: 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031218
|
| [104] |
Kočíková B, Pavlová A, Jacková A, et al. (2024) Evaluation of lyophilized PCR mixes stable at room temperature for detection of viruses. Folia Veterinaria 69: 28-36.
|
| [105] |
Thirion L, Dubot-Peres A, Pezzi L, et al. (2020) Lyophilized matrix containing ready-to-use primers and probe solution for standardization of real-time PCR and RT-qPCR diagnostics in virology. Viruses 12: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020159
|
| [106] |
Auer A, Panzarin V, Monne I, et al. (2023) Comparative assessment of lyophilized and wet reagents for the molecular detection of H5N1 high pathogenic avian influenza virus and H9N2 low pathogenic avian influenza virus. J Virol Methods 314: 114686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114686
|
| [107] |
Thirion L, Dubot-Peres A, Pezzi L, et al. (2020) Lyophilized matrix containing ready-to-use primers and probe solutions for standardization of real-time PCR and RT-qPCR diagnostics. Viruses 12: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020159
|
| [108] |
Pennisi I, Cavuto ML, Miglietta L, et al. (2024) Rapid, portable, and electricity-free sample extraction method for enhanced molecular diagnostics in resource-limited settings. Anal Chem 96: 11181-11188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00319
|
| [109] |
Cavuto ML, Malpartida-Cardenas K, Pennisi I, et al. (2025) Portable molecular diagnostic platform for rapid point-of-care detection of mpox and other diseases. Nat Commun 16: 2875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57647-3
|
| [110] |
Robinson DR, Pennisi I, Cavuto ML, et al. (2025) Sensitive near point-of-care detection of asymptomatic and submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum infections in African endemic countries. Nat Commun 16: 8925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64027-4
|
| [111] |
Zou Y, Mason MG, Wang Y, et al. (2017) Nucleic acid purification from plants, animals and microbes in under 30 seconds. PLoS Biol 15: e2003916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003916
|
| [112] |
Hall-Mendelin S, Hewitson GR, Genge D, et al. (2017) FTA cards facilitate storage, shipment, and detection of arboviruses in infected Aedes aegypti collected in adult mosquito traps. Am J Trop Med Hyg 96: 1241-1243. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0981
|
| [113] |
Ahmed HA, MacLeod ET, Hide G, et al. (2011) The best practice for preparation of samples from FTA®cards for diagnosis of blood borne infections using African trypanosomes as a model system. Parasit Vectors 4: 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-68
|
| [114] |
Bertão-Santos A, da Silva Dias L, Ribeiro-Alves M, et al. (2024) Validation of the performance of a point of care molecular test for leprosy: From a simplified DNA extraction protocol to a portable qPCR. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18: e0012032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012032
|
| [115] |
Dos Santos Soares T, Bello GL, Dos Santos Petry IM, et al. (2024) Laboratory validation of a simplified DNA extraction protocol followed by a portable qPCR detection of M. tuberculosis DNA suitable for point of care settings. PLoS One 19: e0302345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302345
|
| [116] |
Ali N, Bello GL, Rossetti MLR, et al. (2020) Demonstration of a fast and easy sample-to-answer protocol for tuberculosis screening in point-of-care settings: A proof of concept study. PLoS One 15: e0242408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242408
|
| [117] |
Lee HJ, Kim NH, Lee EH, et al. (2023) Multicenter testing of a simple molecular diagnostic system for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosensors 13: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020259
|
| [118] | Prakash S, Bharti S, Priyatma, et al. (2023) Performance characteristic of a simple, rapid and cost-effective micro PCR assay for HBV DNA quantification. J Med Diagn Meth 12: 1000434. |
| [119] |
Nikam C, Kazi M, Nair C, et al. (2014) Evaluation of the Indian TrueNAT micro RT-PCR device with GeneXpert for case detection of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol 3: 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmyco.2014.04.003
|
| [120] |
Basawarajappa SG, Rangaiah A, Padukone S, et al. (2021) Performance evaluation of Truenat™ Beta CoV & Truenat™ SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care assays for coronavirus disease 2019. Indian J Med Res 153: 144-150. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2363_20
|
| [121] |
Hariprasad R, Tulsyan S, Babu R, et al. (2020) Evaluation of a chip-based, point-of-care, portable, real-time micro PCR analyzer for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in uterine cervix in India. JCO Glob Oncol 6: 1147-1154. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00024
|
| [122] |
Nair CB, Manjula J, Subramani PA, et al. (2016) Differential diagnosis of malaria on Truelab Uno®, a portable, real-time, microPCR device for point-of-care applications. PLoS One 11: e0146961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146961
|
| [123] |
Bechtold P, Wagner P, Hosch S, et al. (2023) Development and evaluation of PlasmoPod: A cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test for rapid malaria diagnosis and surveillance. PLOS Global Public Health 3: e0001516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001516
|
| [124] |
Gregorini M, Mikutis G, Grass RN, et al. (2019) Small-size polymerase chain reaction device with improved heat transfer and combined feedforward/feedback control strategy. Ind Eng Chem Res 58: 9665-9674. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01209
|
| [125] |
Messa A, Bengtson M, Fleitas P, et al. (2025) Performance evaluation of the diaxxoPCR system for rapid and user-friendly stool-based diagnosis of trichuriasis, ascariasis and strongyloidiasis in Mozambique. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19: e0013711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013711
|
| [126] |
Shrestha K, Kim S, Han J, et al. (2023) Mobile efficient diagnostics of infectious diseases via on-chip RT-qPCR: MEDIC-PCR. Adv Sci 10: 2302072. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202302072
|
| [127] |
Giangaspero A, Marangi M, Latrofa MS, et al. (2019) Efficiency of the Q3 lab-on-chip Real Time-PCR platform for detecting protozoan pathogens in bivalve mollusks. J Food Sci Technol 56: 5000-5008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03972-7
|
| [128] |
Garzarelli V, Chiriacò MS, Cereda M, et al. (2022) Miniaturized real-time PCR systems for SARS-CoV-2 detection at the point-of-care. Clin Chim Acta 536: 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.09.014
|
| [129] |
Garzarelli V, Chiriacò MS, Cereda M, et al. (2023) Ultrasensitive qPCR platform for rapid detection of bacterial contamination of raw biological samples at the point of care. Heliyon 9: e16229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16229
|
| [130] |
Mizushina H, Imai K, Ohama Y, et al. (2025) Evaluation of the GeneSoC rapid quantitative PCR system for Treponema pallidum detection. J Infect Chemother 31: 102765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102765
|
| [131] |
Endo M, Tokuyama-Toda R, Shirota T, et al. (2025) Rapid diagnosis of viral infections and application to infection control. BMC Infect Dis 25: 1474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11823-4
|
| [132] |
Arbués MD, Rossetti MLR (2024) Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF to diagnose tuberculosis in a public health laboratory. Rev Saude Publica 58: 3. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005306
|
| [133] |
Faria MGBF, Andrade RLP, Camillo AJG, et al. (2021) Performance of GeneXpert for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in people living with HIV/AIDS: An integrative review. PLoS One 16: e0260215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260215
|
| [134] |
Borges IC, Luna-Muschi A, Sabino EC, et al. (2023) Avaliação da tuberculose como fator de risco para a letalidade da COVID-19 em são paulo, brasil. Braz J Infect Dis 27: 103609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2023.103609
|
| [135] |
Tansarli GS, Chapin KC (2020) Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 26: 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.016
|
| [136] |
Lu SM, Wang JL, Li Y, et al. (2025) Autonomous microfluidic influenza A/B subtyping system using on-chip multiplex isothermal amplification for field-deployable surveillance. AMB Expr 15: 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-025-01933-2
|
| [137] |
Yin Q, Kim J, Choi HW, et al. (2025) A self-heating, multi-channel slider cassette for innovative point-of-care molecular diagnostics from whole blood samples. Biosens Bioelectron 290: 117975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2025.117975
|
| [138] | Gao S, Wang L, Zhao M, et al. (2025) Intelligent microfluidic device for multiplex detection and prompt warning of upper and lower respiratory tract infections. J Adv Res . In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.08.005 |
| [139] |
Kim H, Abbas N, Shin S (2021) A rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 using DNA hydrogel formation on microfluidic pores. Biosens Bioelectron 177: 113005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113005
|
| [140] |
Cavallo FR, Mirza KB, de Mateo S, et al. (2022) A point-of-care device for fully automated, fast and sensitive protein quantification via qPCR. Biosensors 12: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12070537
|
| [141] |
Zou Y, Liu M, Gao Z, et al. (2025) Facile and ultrafast microfluidic photothermal PCR for autonomous and quantitative point-of-care pathogen detection. Small 21: 2411417. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202411417
|
| [142] |
Tomaszewicz Brown A, McAloose D, Calle PP, et al. (2020) Development and validation of a portable, point-of-care canine distemper virus qPCR test. PLoS One 15: e0232044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232044
|
| [143] |
Vynck M, Trypsteen W, Thas O, et al. (2016) The future of digital polymerase chain reaction in virology. Mol Diagn Ther 20: 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0224-1
|
| [144] |
Salipante SJ, Jerome KR (2020) Digital PCR—An emerging technology with broad applications in microbiology. Clin Chem 66: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.304048
|
| [145] |
Zhang W, Cui L, Wang Y, et al. (2023) An integrated ddPCR lab-on-a-disc device for rapid screening of infectious diseases. Biosensors 14: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14010002
|
| [146] |
Liu X, Wang X, Zhang H, et al. (2023) Smartphone integrated handheld (SPEED) digital polymerase chain reaction device. Biosens Bioelectron 232: 115319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115319
|
Figures(1) / Tables(3)
Tuany Rodrigues, Bruna Gabriele de Moura, Giovanna Tatarem Coelho de Miranda, Camila Leitzke Toledo, Luma Fernandes Bravo, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa. Application of qPCR testing in clinical diagnostics: A brief review of its history, challenges and perspectives[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2026, 13(2): 180-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2026010
DownLoad: