Research article

Comparative effects of conventional and modern drying methods on drying time, energy consumption, and physicochemical properties of lavender (Lavandula stricta Del.)

  • Received: 24 March 2025 Revised: 21 June 2025 Accepted: 15 July 2025 Published: 28 July 2025
  • Lavender is known as a natural antidepressant and sleep-promoting herbal medicine. In this study, we compared six distinct drying techniques: Refractance window drying (RW), freeze drying (FD), microwave drying (MW), infrared drying (IR), hot air drying (HA), and shade drying (SD), to evaluate their effects on drying time, energy and physicochemical and phytochemical properties of dried lavender. Moreover, we compared drying methods and their influence on water activity, rehydration ratio, total phenolic content, flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, color, and essential oil. RW and MW drying illustrated short-term drying processes with energy saving. All dried lavender samples demonstrated water activity levels within acceptable limits (less than 0.6). The results showed that FD and RW could preserve the total phenolic and total flavonoid contents compared to other techniques. In addition, there was no significant difference (p < 0.05) between RW and frozen samples regarding essential oil yield and rehydration ratio. The total antioxidant capacity of the fresh sample was significantly higher than that of dried samples, but FD significantly preserved the antioxidant content better than other treatments. Moreover, SD-dried samples had the lowest physicochemical and bioactive properties, which were attributed to oxidation reactions and long drying times. The RW sample showed the least color difference. Among the studied methods, FD and RW are recommended due to their superior ability to preserve bioactive compounds and increase the rehydration ratio. In addition, the RW drying method can provide a suitable alternative to FD by providing less time and energy consumption, practical preservation of physicochemical properties, and fewer color changes.

    Citation: Mohammad Kaveh, Shahin Zomorodi, Malgorzata Nowacka, Faroogh Sharifian, Behnam Gheysari, Kamal Imanian. Comparative effects of conventional and modern drying methods on drying time, energy consumption, and physicochemical properties of lavender (Lavandula stricta Del.)[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2025, 12(3): 216-233. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2025014

    Related Papers:

  • Lavender is known as a natural antidepressant and sleep-promoting herbal medicine. In this study, we compared six distinct drying techniques: Refractance window drying (RW), freeze drying (FD), microwave drying (MW), infrared drying (IR), hot air drying (HA), and shade drying (SD), to evaluate their effects on drying time, energy and physicochemical and phytochemical properties of dried lavender. Moreover, we compared drying methods and their influence on water activity, rehydration ratio, total phenolic content, flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, color, and essential oil. RW and MW drying illustrated short-term drying processes with energy saving. All dried lavender samples demonstrated water activity levels within acceptable limits (less than 0.6). The results showed that FD and RW could preserve the total phenolic and total flavonoid contents compared to other techniques. In addition, there was no significant difference (p < 0.05) between RW and frozen samples regarding essential oil yield and rehydration ratio. The total antioxidant capacity of the fresh sample was significantly higher than that of dried samples, but FD significantly preserved the antioxidant content better than other treatments. Moreover, SD-dried samples had the lowest physicochemical and bioactive properties, which were attributed to oxidation reactions and long drying times. The RW sample showed the least color difference. Among the studied methods, FD and RW are recommended due to their superior ability to preserve bioactive compounds and increase the rehydration ratio. In addition, the RW drying method can provide a suitable alternative to FD by providing less time and energy consumption, practical preservation of physicochemical properties, and fewer color changes.



    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    The authors would like to thank Iran National Scientific Foundation (INSF) for the financial support of project no 4020272.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Zamani S, Bakhshi D, Sahraroo A, et al. (2023) Improvement of phytochemical and quality characteristics of Dracocephalum kotschyi by drying methods. Food Sci Nutri 11: 4246-4262. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3351
    [2] Homayounfar H, Amiri Chayjan R, Sarikhani H, et al. (2020) Optimization of different drying systems for lavender leaves applying response surface methodology. J Agr Sci Tech 22: 679-692.
    [3] Dalda-Şekerci A, Çetin N, Beyzi E, et al. (2023) Drying methods affect the drying kinetics, bioactive characteristics, and essential oil composition of Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.) and Lavandin (Lavandula hybrida). J Essent Oil Bear Pl 26: 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2022.2160280
    [4] Altay K, Dirim SN, Hayaloglu AA (2024) Effects of different drying processes on the quality changes in Arapgir purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) leaves and drying-induced changes in bioactive and volatile compounds and essential oils. J Food Sci 89: 9088-9107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17515
    [5] Mahmoudi A, Ebadi MT, Ayyari M (2024) Qualitative changes of Blue eryngo (Eryngium planum L.) phytochemicals as affected by different drying methods. J Appl Res Med Aroma 40: 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2024.100543
    [6] Hazrati S, Lotfi K, Govahi M, et al. (2021) A comparative study: Influence of various drying methods on essential oil components and biological properties of Stachys lavandulifolia. Food Sci Nutr 9: 2612-2619. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2218
    [7] Sarkar A, Haque MA, Alam M (2024) Unlocking the potential of pomegranate peels as a valuable source of bioactive compounds through effective drying strategies. Food Chem Adv 4: 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100622
    [8] Martínez-Sánchez CE, Torres-Niño MS, Ramírez-Figueroa E, et al. (2024) Evaluation of energy efficiency and quality parameters by drying beets with a refractive window (Beta vulgaris). LWT 206: 116589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116589
    [9] Kaveh M, Zomorodi S, Ghaysari B, et al. (2025) Impact of various drying technologies for evaluation of drying kinetics, energy consumption, physical and bioactive properties of Rose flower. Sci Rep 15: 9245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94300-x
    [10] Nazari D, Badi HN, Mehrafarin A, et al. (2024) Expression of the changes in essential oil components of Shirazi thyme (Zataria multiflora Boiss.) as affected by various drying methods. Ind Crop Prod 220: 119222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119222
    [11] Riadh MH, Ahmad SAB, Marhaban MH, et al. (2014) Infrared heating in food drying: An overview. Dry Technol 33: 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.951124
    [12] Rahimmalek M, Goli SAH (2013) Evaluation of six drying treatments with respect to essential oil yield, composition and color characteristics of Thymys daenensis subsp. daenensis. Celak leaves. Ind Crop Prod 42: 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.012
    [13] Sobatinasab Z, Rahimmalek M, Etemadi N, et al. (2024) Evaluation of different drying treatments with respect to essential oil components, phenolic and flavonoid compounds, and antioxidant capacity of Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Molecules 29: 3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143264
    [14] Puente L, Vega-Gálvez A, Ah-Hen KS, et al. (2020) Refractance Window drying of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.) pulp: A comparison of quality characteristics with respect to other drying techniques. LWT 131: 109772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109772
    [15] Baeghbali V, Niakousari M, Ngadi MO, et al. (2019) Combined ultrasound and infrared assisted conductive hydro-drying of apple slices. Drying Technol 37: 1793-1805. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2018.1539745
    [16] Dadhaneeya H, Nayak PK, Saikia D, et al. (2023) The impact of refractance window drying on the physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds of malbhog banana slice and pulp. Appl Food Res 3: 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2023.100279
    [17] Eapen AS, Pillai ARS, Bhosale YK, et al. (2024) Effect of drying techniques on phytochemical properties of Centella asiatica and its application in formulation of herbal yoghurt. Food Humanity 3: 100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100438
    [18] Baeghbali V, Niakousari M, Farahnaky A (2016) Refractance Window drying of pomegranate juice: Quality retention and energy efficiency. LWT-Food Sci Technol 66: 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.017
    [19] Kalse SB, Jain SK, Swami SB, et al. (2025) A comprehensive review of mechanisms, heat transfer dynamics and the hybrid approach of refractance window™ drying. Food Eng Rev 17: 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-025-09399-5
    [20] Polat A, Taskin O, Izli N (2024) Assessment of freeze, continuous, and intermittent infrared drying methods for sliced persimmon. J Food Sci 89: 2332-2346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16994
    [21] Li W, An NN, Yu H, et al. (2025) Enhancing okra drying quality and efficiency through combined freeze and pulsed spouted microwave vacuum drying. Food Bioprocess Technol 18: 2585-2601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-024-03618-3
    [22] Ji Z, Zhao D, Yin J, et al. (2024) Quality analysis and pectin characteristics of winter jujube processed by microwave coupled with pulsed vacuum drying (MPVD). LWT 201: 116236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116236
    [23] Hu D, Liu X, Qin Y, et al. (2023) The impact of different drying methods on the physical properties, bioactive components, antioxidant capacity, volatile components and industrial application of coffee peel. Food Chem X 19: 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100807
    [24] Demircan B, Velioglu YS, Giuffrè AM (2024) Comparison of different drying methods for bergamot peel: Chemical and physicochemical properties. J Food Sci 89: 1498-1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16944
    [25] Dadhaneeya H, Kesavan RK, Inbaraj BS, et al. (2023) Impact of different drying methods on the phenolic composition, in vitro antioxidant activity, and quality attributes of dragon fruit slices and pulp. Foods 12: 1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12071387
    [26] Leiton-Ramírez YM, Ayala-Aponte A, Ochoa-Martínez CI (2020) Physicochemical properties of guava snacks as affected by drying technology. Processes 8: 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8010106
    [27] Nahar N, Hazra S, Raychaudhuri U, et al. (2022) Effect of different drying methods on drying kinetics, modeling, energy-economic, texture profile, color, and antioxidant of lotus rhizomes (Nelumbo nucifera). J Food Process Pres 46: e16842. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16842
    [28] Altay Ö, Selçuk E, Salık RA, et al. (2023) Effects of pre-drying methods on physicochemical, textural and color quality attributes of explosive puffed dried mandarin snacks. Dry Technol 41: 1893-1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2023.2203206
    [29] Li L, Zhang M, Lu C, et al. (2024) Appearance, microstructure, and bioactive components of Bletilla striata tuber as affected by different drying methods. Food Bioprocess Technol 17: 3746-3756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-024-03348-6
    [30] Alolga RN, Osae R, Ibrahim TS, et al. (2022) Distinct metabolomes and quality characteristics of vacuum-assisted osmosonic-pretreated Curcuma longa L. rhizomes subjected to different drying methods. Ind Crop Prod 185: 115156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115156
    [31] Gao J, Li M, Cheng Z, et al. (2024) Effects of different drying methods on drying characteristics and quality of small white apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Agriculture 14: 1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101716
    [32] Li MX, Wang B, Li Y, et al. (2025) Exploration of the impact of different drying methods on the quality of Gastrodia elata: A study based on drying kinetics and multidimensional quality evaluation. Food Chem 464: 141628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141628
    [33] Zalpouri R, Kaur P, Kaur A, et al. (2021) Comparative analysis of optimized physiochemical parameters of dried potato flakes obtained by refractive and convective drying techniques. J Food Process Pres 45: e15077. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15077
    [34] Jafari SM, Azizi D, Mirzaei H, et al. (2016) Comparing quality characteristics of oven-dried and Refractance Window-dried kiwifruits. J Food Process Pres 40: 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12613
    [35] Caparino OA, Tang J, Nindo CI, et al. (2012) Effect of drying methods on the physical properties and microstructures of mango (Philippine ‘Carabao’var.) powder. J Food Eng 111: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.010
    [36] Topuz A, Feng H, Kushad M (2009) The effect of drying method and storage on color characteristics of paprika. LWT-Food Sci Technol 42: 1667-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.014
    [37] Tran TG, Nguyen VH, Nguyen VT (2024) Physicochemical, phytochemical and antioxidant properties of medicinal plant roots Dan sam (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge) prepared under different drying conditions. Cogent Food Agr 10: 2420843. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2420843
    [38] Ren S, Zheng E, Zhao T, et al. (2022) Evaluation of physicochemical properties, equivalent umami concentration and antioxidant activity of Coprinus comatus prepared by different drying methods. LWT 162: 113479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113479
    [39] Boateng ID, Yang XM (2021) Thermal and non-thermal processing affect Maillard reaction products, flavor, and phytochemical profiles of Ginkgo biloba seed. Food Biosci 41: 101044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101044
    [40] Minuye M, Yenasew A, Belew S (2024) Effect of drying method on the nutritional and antioxidant properties of mango, avocado, and tomato. J Hortic Res 32: 43-50.
    [41] Hernández-Santos B, Martínez-Sánchez CE, Torruco-Uco JG, et al. (2016) Evaluation of physical and chemical properties of carrots dried by Refractance Window drying. Drying Technol 34: 1414-1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2015.1118705
    [42] Núñez H, Jaques A, Belmonte K, et al. (2023) Effect of CO2 laser microperforation pretreatment on the dehydration of apple slices during refractive window drying. Foods 12: 2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112187
    [43] Bhat IM, Wani SM, Mir SA, et al. (2023) Effect of microwave-assisted vacuum and hot air oven drying methods on quality characteristics of apple pomace powder. Food Prod Process Nutr 5: 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-023-00141-4
    [44] Zhang M, Wu C, Zhang H, et al. (2024) Comparison of different drying technologies for kiwifruit pomace: Changes in physical characteristics, nutritional properties and antioxidant capacities. Food Chem 451: 139497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139497
    [45] Pirbalouti AG, Oraie M, Pouriamehr M, et al. (2013) Effects of drying methods on qualitative and quantitative of the essential oil of Bakhtiari savory (Satureja bachtiarica Bunge.). Ind Crop Prod 46: 324-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.014
    [46] Pirbalouti AG, Salehi S, Craker L (2017) Effect of drying methods on qualitative and quantitative properties of essential oil from the aerial parts of coriander. J Appl Res Med Aromat 4: 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.07.006
    [47] Rudy S, Dziki D, Biernacka B, et al. (2020) Drying characteristics of Dracocephalum moldavica leaves: Drying kinetics and physicochemical properties. Processes 8: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050509
    [48] Mokhtarikhah G, Ebadi MT, Ayyari M (2020) Qualitative changes of spearmint essential oil as affected by drying methods. Ind Crop Prod 153: 112492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112492
    [49] Zhang LL, Lv S, Xu JG, et al. (2018) Influence of drying methods on chemical compositions, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of essential oil from lemon peel. Nat Prod Res 32: 1184-1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2017.1320791
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(795) PDF downloads(43) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog