Research article

Co-application of biochar and phosphorus increases soil microbial biomass, mycorrhizal colonization, growth, and nutrition of subterranean clover

  • Received: 08 June 2024 Revised: 15 December 2024 Accepted: 06 January 2025 Published: 10 January 2025
  • Phosphorus (P) plays important roles in the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization and rhizobium nodulation processes. Additionally, biochar's positive roles in mycorrhizal colonization and nodulation are articulated. However, the effect of the co-application of biochar and P on AM colonization and rhizobium nodulation was poorly studied. This study investigated the effect of the co-application of wheat straw biochar and P using soil columns on mycorrhizal colonization, nodulation, and the growth of subterranean clover. The soil was amended with wheat straw biochar at 0, 5, and 10 t ha−1 with different levels of P fertilizer at 0, 5, and 10 kg P ha−1. These studies showed that adding biochar at 5 t ha−1 along with mineral P fertilizer increased plant growth, mycorrhizal root colonization and nodulation, and P concentration in plants. In most cases, the increasing trend of the biomass yield was higher when biochar and the P fertilizer were applied together at a higher level (P10). These findings suggested that an increased biochar application rate can increase the subterranean clover growth in soil with either no (P0) or a lower P (P5) fertilizer application. Mycorrhizal colonization could help to improve the P supply and subsequently stimulate the root nodulation of leguminous plants.

    Citation: Zakaria M. Solaiman, Paul Blackwell, Muhammad Izhar Shafi, Nariman D. Salman, Paul Storer, Emre Babur. Co-application of biochar and phosphorus increases soil microbial biomass, mycorrhizal colonization, growth, and nutrition of subterranean clover[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 59-73. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025004

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohammad Zahangeer Alam, Malancha Dey (Roy) . The reduction of abiotic stress in food crops through climate-smart mycorrhiza-enriched biofertilizer. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 674-693. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024031
    [2] George P. Stamou, Sotiris Konstadinou, Nikolaos Monokrousos, Anna Mastrogianni, Michalis Orfanoudakis, Christos Hassiotis, Urania Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, Despoina Vokou, Efimia M. Papatheodorou . The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and essential oil on soil microbial community and N-related enzymes during the fungal early colonization phase. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 938-959. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.938
    [3] Haggai Wasserstrom, Vered Elias Ben-Ezra, Chen Sherman, Adrian Unc, Yosef Steinberger . The influence of flint stones on a soil microbial community in the northern Negev Desert. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 580-595. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.580
    [4] William D. Eaton, Debra A. Hamilton, Wen Chen, Alexander Lemenze, Patricia Soteropoulos . Use of high throughput DNA analysis to characterize the nodule-associated bacterial community from four ages of Inga punctata trees in a Costa Rican cloud forest. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 572-595. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024027
    [5] Nieves Barros, Sergio Feijoo, César Pérez-Cruzado, Lee D. Hansen . Effect of soil storage at 4 °C on the calorespirometric measurements of soil microbial metabolism. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 762-773. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.762
    [6] Arnab Bhowmik, Mara Cloutier, Emily Ball, Mary Ann Bruns . Underexplored microbial metabolisms for enhanced nutrient recycling in agricultural soils. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 826-845. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.826
    [7] Paola Ortiz-Ojeda, Katty Ogata-Gutiérrez, Doris Zúñiga-Dávila . Evaluation of plant growth promoting activity and heavy metal tolerance of psychrotrophic bacteria associated with maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) rhizosphere. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 279-292. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.279
    [8] Jordan Brown, Corona Chen, Melania Fernández, Deborah Carr . Urban endoliths: incidental microbial communities occurring inside concrete. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 277-312. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023016
    [9] José Rodrigo da-Silva, Ana Alexandre, Clarisse Brígido, Solange Oliveira . Can stress response genes be used to improve the symbiotic performance of rhizobia?. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 365-382. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.365
    [10] Sabrine Balti, Yassine Mabrouk, Mouna Souihi, Imen Hemissi, Ismail Amri, Ethan Humm, Noor Khan, Ann M. Hirsch . Combined inoculation of rhizobacteria with Mesorhizobium promotes growth, nutrient contents, and protects chickpea against Fusarium redolens. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 318-337. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025015
  • Phosphorus (P) plays important roles in the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization and rhizobium nodulation processes. Additionally, biochar's positive roles in mycorrhizal colonization and nodulation are articulated. However, the effect of the co-application of biochar and P on AM colonization and rhizobium nodulation was poorly studied. This study investigated the effect of the co-application of wheat straw biochar and P using soil columns on mycorrhizal colonization, nodulation, and the growth of subterranean clover. The soil was amended with wheat straw biochar at 0, 5, and 10 t ha−1 with different levels of P fertilizer at 0, 5, and 10 kg P ha−1. These studies showed that adding biochar at 5 t ha−1 along with mineral P fertilizer increased plant growth, mycorrhizal root colonization and nodulation, and P concentration in plants. In most cases, the increasing trend of the biomass yield was higher when biochar and the P fertilizer were applied together at a higher level (P10). These findings suggested that an increased biochar application rate can increase the subterranean clover growth in soil with either no (P0) or a lower P (P5) fertilizer application. Mycorrhizal colonization could help to improve the P supply and subsequently stimulate the root nodulation of leguminous plants.



    Intensive agricultural practices such as overgrazing, deforestation, the increasing world population, limited freshwater, land resources, mining, and manufacturing industries have created challenging dialogues to discuss the sustainable strengthening of agriculture [1],[2]. Despite the agricultural productivity growth rapidly expanding over the last 50 years, the long-term projection rate of the crop yield growth for the most important crops, resources, and soil nutrients has declined. The low availability of essential plant nutrients and the subsequent decline in yield can adversely impact food security and economic development. Therefore, to enhance the soil nutrient supply and the crop yield, the traditional method of synthetic fertilizer use is followed worldwide [3]. Surface runoff and leaching are significant factors that lower the nutrient concentrations in soil, and these factors encourage farmers to continuously use chemical fertilizers. This practice may enrich the soils with nutrients; however, the low plant uptake efficiency might be due to a short bioavailability. Additionally, the constant use of chemical fertilizers can negatively affect the soil microbial fauna and flora [4]. Alternatively, the appropriate land use measurements have been extended to fulfil the unique growing requirements to some extent [5]. However, there is still a requirement to comprehend the sustainability at very high environmental costs, thus representing agricultural intensification for production [1]. Biochar has captured the attention of researchers because of its ability to improve the soil cation exchange capacity, the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and the plant nutrient availability [6].

    In Australia, biochar and its application to soil have been evaluated for its agricultural and environmental benefits [7]. It has been reported that biochar directly affects the soil fertility, crop production, C sequestration, and fertiliser use efficiency in the soil [8],[9]. The soil fauna and flora, mainly mycorrhizal root colonisation, crop yield, and fertilizer use efficiency, have been reported to improve with biochar incorporation [10]. Additionally, it has been documented that biochar positively impacts arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) root colonization, crop water use, and nutrient (nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)) supply for wheat crops in dryland areas of Western Australia [11]. Many researchers [12][14] have also reported positive plant growth and yield response to biochar amendment. The effect of biochar on the soil's physical and chemical properties mainly depends on the pyrolysis process and the feedstock used (e.g., crop residues, animal manures, or wood) [15],[16].

    Biochar, a carbon-rich material, is produced by various thermo-chemical biomass conversion processes (i.e., pyrolysis, a dry carbonization procedure that generally takes place at 400–800 °C) [17]. Many studies have shown the variance of potential affirmative consequences of biochar application to soils with some organic fertilizers and beneficial soil microorganisms on the soil properties, crop productivity, and nutrient availability [10],[18],[19]. Biochar positively influences the plant nutrient uptake directly by its mineral composition and release and indirectly by providing better nutrient adsorption [20]. It is also involved in improving the nutrient and water-holding capacity of soils [21],[22], increasing the pH of soils [23], amplifying the physical properties of soil [24], and improving the functions of soil microbial flora and their population in soil [25]. Moreover, the soil amendment with biochar can efficiently use chemical fertilizers by retaining nutrients and by reducing nutrient leaching from the root zone [20]. Biochar has also been used as an excellent option for managing soils that have exhausted their nutrient status, which is now rising as an augmented global concern. As biochar is produced from plant materials, it contains various concentrations of carbon and plant-available macro- and micronutrients. Additionally, the physical and chemical behavior of the biochar produced has a dynamic impact on the plant nutrient uptake capacity by mineralising the nutrients by the soil solution, microbial biomass, and plant roots [26],[27]. For the current experiment, the biochar was produced from wheat straw and was characterised, and its impact on the soil moisture availability to the crop, carbon sequestration, crop growth, and yield in rainfed conditions were studied.

    Phosphorus plays essential roles in AM colonization and rhizobium nodulation processes. Additionally, biochar's positive roles in AM and nodulation are articulated. However, the effects of the co-application of biochar and P on AM colonization and rhizobium nodulation were poorly studied.

    The field soil used in this experiment was an acidic white Tenosol [28] and ‘Dystric Fluventic Eutrudept’ as reported in the US Soil Taxonomic classification [29] at Moonyoonooka near Geraldton, Western Australia (28°44′11.94″S 114°43′15.84″E). The experimental location has a Mediterranean-type climate with a mean annual rainfall and temperature of <400 mm and 28 °C, respectively. Within the year of this trial, the experimental site received about 245 mm of rainfall. The soil used for the experiment was preferred because of its loamy sand texture, which provides a low N and P retention capacity. This is the representative property of most soils in the Western Australian agricultural area.

    In this experiment, wheat straw biochar in three rates (0, 5, and 10 t ha−1 noted as B0, B5, and B10, respectively) was used without and with the application of different levels of P fertilizer (0, 5, and 10 kg P ha−1 noted as P0, P5, and P10, respectively) [10],[11], while all the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes filled with soil (collected from 0–10 cm) were inoculated with rhizobium inoculum. The soil was mixed with biochar and P by weight and left undisturbed for one month before subterranean clover seeds were sowed. Polyvinyl chloride tubes, each with a dimension of 1 m long and a diameter of 100 mm with both ends opened, were used in a randomized block design under open-air conditions. Subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum cv Dalkeith) seeds at the rate of ten seeds per tube with applied treatments were sown but were thinned to four seedlings after two weeks of germination. Dalkeith is an early flowering subterranean clover best suited to moderately acidic, well-drained soils with an annual rainfall of approximately 300–500 mm. The growing period was from early October to December.

    The 0–10 cm soil layer was analyzed for basic properties (Table 1). The soil contained 85% sand, 3% silt and 12% clay. The pH of the soil was 4.8 and was measured at 0.01 M CaCl2 at 1:5 (w/v) ratio. The organic matter was 10.3 g kg−1 in the soil measured by dry combustion using an elementar (vario MACRO CNS; Elementar, Germany). The soil contained 0.6 g kg−1 total N, and 7 and 5 mg kg−1 NO3-N and NH4-N, respectively. This soil was chosen because of its loamy sand texture, which gave it a low capacity to retain P, and the low available P (7.5 mg kg−1) content was suitable for a mycorrhizal response in the subterranean clover. The soil P and K were measured using the 0.5 M NaHCO3 extraction method [30]. The available soil Colwell P, organic P [31], and microbial biomass P [32] were extracted after harvesting the plants. The P concentration in the extracts was measured using a spectrophotometer [33]. After 111 days of growth from each treatment pot, the sown crop was harvested and separately placed into a plastic bag as shoots and roots. Then, the soil and plant samples were brought into the laboratory and oven-dried at 70 ºC for 72 h for analysis. A sub-sample of the fresh roots was fixed in a formaldehyde mixture (ethanol 70%, formaldehyde, and acetic acid at a ratio of 90:5:5 v/v) to count the nodulation. The oven-dried shoots were ground and digested in a 3:1 HNO3-HClO4 mixture, and the P concentration within the digest was measured by the molybdenum-blue method. The P shoot uptake was calculated by multiplying the shoot P concentration by the shoot weight.

    Table 1.  Basic properties of wheat straw biochar and soil used in this experiment.
    Properties Wheat straw biochar Soil
    Pyrolysis temperature (°C) 450 -
    pH (H2O) 8.4 5.8
    pH (CaCl2) 8.3 4.9
    EC (dS m−1) 9.2 0.05
    Carbon (g kg−1) 531.0 13.1
    Nitrogen (g kg−1) 2.2 1.0
    C:N ratio 241.4 13.2
    NH4+-N (mg kg−1) 2.1 5.0
    NO3--N (mg kg−1) <0.1 7.0
    Phosphorus (mg kg−1) 0.4 7.5
    Potassium (mg kg−1) 3.4 35
    CEC (m.e./100gC) 45.6 4.0
    WHC (%) 287 25

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The root colonization by the AM fungi was estimated using the standard procedure described by [34]. Briefly, the root samples (0.5 g fresh weight) were cleaned by treating them with a 10% KOH solution, rinsed with water, acidified with 10% HCl, and then stained with 0.05% trypan blue. The root colonization in the subterranean clover plants was determined by examining the percentage of the root length colonized under a dissecting microscope using the gridline intersects method [35]. The gridline intersects were counted for the presence of mycorrhizal structures at ×100 magnification. Mycorrhizal colonization was counted in three replicate samples.

    Genstat (v.18) was used to conduct all the statistical analyses. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant difference among the applied treatments, and Fisher's protested least significant difference (LSD) was applied to check for any significance between the means of the results. The significant Pearson correlations between the measured soil and plant parameters were tested after eight weeks of subterranean clover growth. Additionally, the plant parameters (shoot and root mass, P concentration, and uptake in shoots) and mycorrhizal colonization were explored with a principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the association between these traits and mycorrhizal colonization. The analysis was based on the correlation matrix and multivariate analyses performed for the plant parameters with the mycorrhizal root colonization [36].

    Data of the shoot and root dry weight of subterranean clover are presented in Figure 1. The interaction effect of biochar and the P fertilizer on the shoot dry weight was not significant. The main effect of biochar on the shoot dry weight was significant when the B5 and B10 were higher than the control (Figure 1a). Biochar and the P fertilizer interactions significantly affected the root dry weight. It showed a maximum root dry weight in treatment B5P10, followed by B10P5, which was statistically similar to B5P0, B10P0, and B10P10. In contrast, the lowest root dry weight was obtained in the treatment where no fertilizer and biochar were applied (Figure 1b). The main effect and the interaction effect of biochar on the shoot-root ratio were insignificant (data not shown).

    Figure 1.  Effect of wheat straw biochar rates on (a) the shoot dry weight, and wheat straw biochar × P fertilizer interaction effect on (b) the root dry weight of subterranean clover in the field conditions.
    Table 2.  Results of p values of two-way ANOVA showing the significance level of all treatment combinations (with four replications).
    Sources of variations Shoot DW Root DW S/R ratio Myc. Colon. Nodulation Shoot P conc. Shoot P uptake Soil available P Microbial biomass P Soil organic P
    Biochar <0.001 <0.001 0.962ns <0.001 0.014 <0.001 <0.001 0.141ns 0.129ns 0.043
    P 0.177ns 0.369ns 0.600ns <0.001 0.255ns 0.258ns <0.001 0.014 <0.001 0.640ns
    Biochar × P 0.087ns 0.010 0.386ns <0.001 0.475ns 0.042 <0.047 0.549ns 0.026 0.628ns

    Myc. = mycorrhizal; Colon. = colonisation; conc. = concentration; ns = not significant

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The result of the total nodule number per pot of the subterranean clover shows that the nodule number significantly increased with the addition of biochar, irrespective of the biochar rates to the control (Figure 2a). The mycorrhizal root colonization also showed similar trends. The data shows that biochar integration improved the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associations with the crop roots (Figure 2b). The mycorrhizal root colonization was significantly (p ≤ 0.005) higher in response to the separate fertilizer and biochar applications, and even shows a higher significance level (p ≤ 0.001) in a combination of both biochar and the P fertilizer (Table 2).

    Figure 2.  Effect of wheat straw biochar on (a) the total nodule number and biochar × P fertilizer interactions effects on the (b) root colonisation, (c) shoot phosphorus concentration, and (d) shoot phosphorus uptake of subterranean clover in the field conditions.

    Data regarding the clover plants' P concentration and its uptake by plant shoots increased when biochar was added to the plant. The result indicates that the highest P concentration was noted in treatments where B10P0 and B5P5 were applied, which were not significantly higher than the B5P10, B10P5, and B10P10 treatments. All these treatments showed statistically similar percentiles of P in the clover shoot. Still, without the addition of biochar, the fertilizer application did not increase the shoot P percentile (Figure 2c). A similar trend was noted in the case of P uptake of the clover shoots, where treatments B10P5, B10P0, B5P5, B10P10, and B5P10 showed an increase of P uptake by the shoot as compared to the other applied treatments (Figure 2d). The biochar application significantly increased the P concentration in the shoots, as well as the P uptake by the shoots. Still, applying the fertilizer did not affect the P concentration in shoots nor its uptake by the plants.

    Data related to the available microbial and organic P is represented in Figure 3. At the harvest of the subterranean clover, it was observed that the Colwell available P was noted to be maximum in the B10P5, B10P10, B5P10, and B0P10 treatments as compared to the other fertilizer treatments; this increase was statistically similar in all treatments. In contrast, the lowest was noted in pots where no biochar or fertilizer was applied (Figure 3a). A similar trend was observed in the microbial P in the soil of the clover rhizosphere area. It was noted that the application of the B0P10, B5P5, B10P5, and B10P10 treatments showed increased microbial P concentrations compared to the other treatments where a low dose of the fertilizer was used (Figure 3b). The biochar application with the combination of the fertilizer application probably increases the microbial activity. As a result, it significantly increased the available and microbial P. On the other hand, the organic P in the soil showed an increase only in the B5 treatment (Figure 3c), and no significant interactions were observed between the biochar and P treatments applied.

    Significant correlation coefficients (r) were observed between the soil P fractions, all the measured plant growth parameters, and the % mycorrhizal colonization (Table 3). The soil available P (NaHCO3-extractable Colwell P) was significantly correlated with the nodulation numbers (r = 0.426*, p ≤ 0.05), the shoot P uptake (r = 0.444*, p ≤ 0.05), and the mycorrhizal root colonization (r = 0.309*, p ≤ 0.05) in the subterranean clover plants (Table 3). A significant correlation coefficient (r) was also observed between the nodulation number with the shoot DW (r = 0.457*, p ≤ 0.05) and with the uptake of P in the plant shoot tissues (r = 0.528*, p ≤ 0.05). Even though the availability of P in the soil and the % mycorrhizal colonization were positively correlated, the soil microbial biomass and the soil organic P were not significantly correlated with the % mycorrhizal colonization, plant growth, or P uptake (p ≤ 0.05). The shoot dry weight, shoot P concentration, and shoot P uptake were positively correlated with the % mycorrhizal colonization for the subterranean clover (p ≤ 0.05). There was a non-significant correlation between the root biomass of the subterranean clover and mycorrhizal colonization (p ≥ 0.05) and between the root biomass with a nodulation of the subterranean clover (p ≥ 0.05). However, there was a non-significant positive correlation between the nodulation and the % mycorrhizal colonization of the subterranean clover (r = 0.232, p > 0.05).

    Figure 3.  Effect of P fertilizer on soil (a) the available phosphorus, biochar × P fertilizer interactions effect on (b) the microbial biomass phosphorus, and biochar effect on (c) the organic phosphorus concentrations after harvest of subterranean clover in field conditions.
    Table 3.  Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between the mycorrhizal colonization, nodulation, soil, and plant properties after 16 weeks of growth.
    Variables Shoot DW Root DW Nodulation number S/R ratio Soil available P Microbial biomass P Soil organic P Shoot P conc. Shoot P uptake
    Shoot DW 1
    Root DW 0.713 1
    Nodulation 0.457 0.295 1
    S/R ratio -0.097 -0.630 -0.115 1
    Soil available P 0.136 0.046 0.426 0.070 1
    Microbial biomass P -0.015 0.174 0.153 -0.291 0.136 1
    Soil organic P -0.050 -0.081 0.137 0.056 0.038 -0.144 1
    Shoot P conc. -0.222 -0.317 0.097 0.322 0.276 0.015 -0.172 1
    Shoot P uptake 0.609 0.350 0.528 0.127 0.444 0.146 -0.230 0.560 1
    Mycorrhizal col. 0.375 0.193 0.232 0.174 0.309 -0.048 -0.255 0.563 0.690

    Values in bold are significant at level p = 0.05. conc. = concentration

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The principal component analysis biplot in Figure 4 showed a correlation among different parameters of the study observed. They include P concentrations in the shoots and roots of the subterranean clover, mycorrhizal colonization, shoot and root dry mass of plants, and their ratio. Variables close enough and forming a slight angle are positively correlated, and those far away from each other at an angle of 180° are negatively correlated. With the application of all treatments, PC1 and PC2 were most influenced by all the treatments compared to control, which positively influenced the plant characteristics and P concentration in the shoots and roots. The scatterplot showed slightly overlapping groups of samples corresponding to the particular treatments applied, and the differentiation pattern concerning the plant parameters was pronounced with the treatments used. The most significant differences between biochar and the P fertilizer rates were observed for the subterranean clover. The observed increased % of mycorrhizal colonization in the subterranean clover corresponded to an enhanced P concentration with both the shoots and roots.

    Figure 4.  Biplot of principal component analysis ordination diagram based on PC1 vs PC2 of the subterranean clover (mycorrhizal colonization, shoot and root mass, S/R ratio, P concentration and P uptake in the shoots) for samples of the biochar and P fertilizer treatments plus a control. The percentage of the total variance, as explained by each axis, is shown.

    Data of the shoot and root dry weights of the subterranean clover and their ratio revealed a significant increase with the biochar application; additionally, a significant improvement could be observed in the cases of the total dry weight, mycorrhizal colonization, and nodule numbers. Adding biochar with the fertilizer and microbial inoculation was reported to increase the soil's crop growth and nutrient uptake capacity [10],[37],[38]. The mechanism behind this increase is the availability of inorganic and organic nutrients present in biochar and those from inorganic fertilizers. A significant part of N also contributes to the developed nodulation system of roots. Moreover, many other studies revealed that the application of biochar induced the expression of specific genes that could influence plant growth [39],[40]. The dual inoculation of Rhizobium and Glomus has also been reported to significantly increase the soybean plants' total biomass [40]. Our findings indicated that the subterranean clover had produced more mycorrhiza colonized roots in the pots when low amounts of biochar and fertilizer were applied. The use of biochar reduced the amount of fertilizer required and increased the root nodulation and AM fungal root colonization. A detailed study on biochar clearly stated that the soils amended with biochar could modify the soils' physicochemical properties, which may lead to increases in the soil pH and nutrient availability and subsequent alterations in the root colonization by AM fungi [41].

    In their studies, many researchers quoted the positive impact of biochar on root colonization and documented that the P supply can be enhanced by the addition of biochar in the drylands of Western Australia. Biochar has the capacity to build up the mycorrhizal colonization in soil and, in return, influence the P and N uptake of the plants. The amendment of soil with biochar and microbial inoculation was reported to increase the mycorrhizal colonization of crop roots and their growth in rainfed areas of Western Australia [10],[11].

    Data regarding the P concentration and its uptake by the subterranean clover plants showed an increase with biochar and the P fertilizer application. The increase in the plant P concentration and uptake may be possibly due to the application of biochar with the P fertilizer and the stimulation of the mycorrhizal colonization, thus leading to an increased P uptake. Phosphorus uptake by plants largely depends on the beneficial associations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with the roots of plants. These fungi release some extracellular phosphatases and P-solubilizing organic acids, thus making the organic P plant available. Many scientists have reported that adding biochar boosts the mycorrhizal colonization of roots by producing favorable environmental conditions for mycorrhizal spores' survival. Thus, the plant P uptake occurred with an enhanced solubility of P [41][43]. The addition of biochar to soils improves the N, P, and other major cation concentrations in soils, as well as their availability and uptake by plants [10],[44]. The response of biochar is associated with the types and properties of the biomass used in the production of biochar, the addition of chemical and organic fertilizers to the soil, and the crops grown [6],[20],[45]. The addition of biochar to the rhizosphere of the P-deficient soils has the potential to increase the plant growth, yield, and P uptake [46].

    Data on the post-harvest soil available and microbial biomass P concentrations showed a significant increase with the P application but not with biochar. This slow release of P could be due to the application of biochar, which may capture the available P on its binding sites and slowly release it to the crop. The same level of soil P concentration in higher biochar rates may be due to the low amount of available P in biochar. Many previous studies have revealed that P and N may become either more available or unavailable to plants and soils after the soil amendment with biochar, which largely depends on the nutrient concentrations of the applied biochar [7],[41],[47]. The available organic and microbial P concentrations increased with the addition of biochar and the P fertilizer. The increase in soil P concentration could result from the application of biochar because biochar can change the soil's physicochemical properties, thus leading to an increased nutrient availability in soil [41],[44],[48].

    Based on the results, adding biochar to soils with a P fertilizer increased the biomass of subterranean clover roots, whereas biochar increased the shoot dry weight more than the control irrespective of the P fertilizer rates. In addition, the increased root colonization induced more P uptake of plants when biochar with a mineral P fertilizer was applied. The research results also indicated the positive roles of biochar and the P fertilizer to provide more economical access to P as either applied or stored in the soil and to help improve the profitable clover pasture production. It is concluded that the combined application of biochar and a mineral P fertilizer can increase the microbial activities and decrease the use of chemical fertilizers without compromising the environmental risks and improving the sustainability of agriculture. However, more research under field conditions is necessary for a quantitative recommendation.


    Acknowledgments



    We thank UWA Soil Science's technical staff for analyzing soil and plant samples.

    Author contributions



    ZMS and PB conceived and designed this study. PB, ZMS and NDS performed the experiments, MIS did data analysis. MIS, PB and ZMS wrote the manuscript. ZMS, PS and EB revised the manuscript.

    Competing interests



    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Funding



    This research received no external funding.

    Data Availability Statement



    The data supporting the results and conclusions in this manuscript are included in the paper.

    [1] Garnett T, Appleby MC, Balmford A, et al. (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341: 33-34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485
    [2] Godfray HCJ, Garnett T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Phil Tran Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 369: 20120273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273
    [3] Sanchez PA (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295: 2019-2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065256
    [4] Bah A, Husni MHA, Teh CBS, et al. (2014) Reducing runoff loss of applied nutrients in oil palm cultivation using controlled-release fertilizers. Adv Agric 2014: ID 285387. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/285387
    [5] Withers PJ, Clay SD, Breeze VG (2001) Phosphorus transfer in runoff following application of fertilizer, manure, and sewage sludge. J Environ Qual 30: 180-188. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.301180x
    [6] Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35: 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4
    [7] Chan KY, Zwieten L, Mészáros I, et al. (2008) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Res 45: 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07109
    [8] Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5: 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2
    [9] Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447: 143e144. https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a
    [10] Solaiman ZM, Blackwell P, Abbott LK, et al. (2010) Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat. Soil Res 48: 546-554. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10002
    [11] Blackwell P, Krull E, Butler G, et al. (2010) Effect of banded biochar on dryland wheat production and fertiliser use in south-western Australia: an agronomic and economic perspective. Soil Res 48: 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10014
    [12] Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, et al. (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333: 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0
    [13] Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, et al. (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291: 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9
    [14] Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, et al. (2011) Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use Manage 27: 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00340.x
    [15] Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, et al. (2011) Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioener Res 4: 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-011-9133-7
    [16] Meyer S, Glaser B, Quicker P (2011) Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review. Environ Sci Technol 45: 9473-9483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201792c
    [17] Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, et al. (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2: 71-106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81
    [18] Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, et al. (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144: 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015
    [19] Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5: 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12037
    [20] Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, et al. (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249: 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022833116184
    [21] Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, et al. (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 1719-1730. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0383
    [22] Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis D, et al. (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158: 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.013
    [23] Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, et al. (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43: 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z
    [24] Chan K, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, et al. (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Res 46: 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08036
    [25] Pietikäinen J, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H (2000) Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 89: 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890203.x
    [26] Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems–a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Change 11: 403-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5
    [27] Gunarathne VS, Mayakaduwa, Vithanage M (2017) Biochar's influence as a soil amendment for essential plant nutrient uptake. Essential Plant Nutrients.Springer 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58841-4_3
    [28] Isbell R (1996) The Australian soil classification. Melbourne, Vic: CSIRO Publishing.
    [29] Hewitt N (1998) Seed size and shade-tolerance: a comparative analysis of North American temperate trees. Oecologia 114: 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050467
    [30] Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Animal Prod Sci 3: 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9630190
    [31] Condron LM, Moir JO, Tiessen H, et al. (1990) Critical evaluation of methods for determining total organic phosphorus in tropical soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54: 1261-1266. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x
    [32] Kouno K, Tuchiya Y, Ando T (1995) Measurement of soil microbial biomass phosphorus by an anion-exchange membrane method. Soil Biol Biochem 27: 1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00057-L
    [33] Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chimica Acta 27: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
    [34] Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Tran Br Mycol Soc 55: 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
    [35] Tennant D (1975) Test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63: 995-1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258617
    [36] Majewska ML, Rola K, Zubek S (2017) The growth and phosphorus acquisition of invasive plants Rudbeckia laciniata and Solidago gigantea are enhanced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 27: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0729-9
    [37] Graber ER, Harel YM, Kolton M, et al. (2010) Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant Soil 337: 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6
    [38] Mia S, van Groenigen JW, van de Voorde TFJ, et al. (2014) Biochar application rate affects biological nitrogen fixation in red clover conditional on potassium availability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191: 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.011
    [39] Harel YM, Elad Y, Rav-David D, et al. (2012) Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens. Plant Soil 357: 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1129-3
    [40] Mehari ZH, Elad Y, Rav-David D, et al. (2015) Induced systemic resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Botrytis cinerea by biochar amendment involves jasmonic acid signaling. Plant Soil 395: 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2445-1
    [41] Solaiman ZM, Abbott LK, Murphy DV (2019) Biochar phosphorus concentration dictates mycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth and soil phosphorus cycling. Sci Rep 9: 5062. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41671-7
    [42] Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, et al. (2007) Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil 300: 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5
    [43] Gul S, Whalen JK (2016) Biochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 103: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.001
    [44] Blackwell P, Joseph S, Munroe P, et al. (2015) Influences of biochar and biochar-mineral complex on mycorrhizal colonisation and nutrition of wheat and sorghum. Pedosphere 25: 686-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30049-7
    [45] Mickan BS, Abbott LK, Stefanova K, et al. (2016) Interactions between biochar and mycorrhizal fungi in a water-stressed agricultural soil. Mycorrhiza 2016 26: 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0693-4
    [46] Shen Z, Som AM, Wang F, et al. (2016) Long-term impact of biochar on the immobilisation of nickel (II) and zinc (II) and the revegetation of a contaminated site. SciTotal Environ 542: 771-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.057
    [47] Madiba OF, Solaiman ZM, Carson JK, et al. (2016) Biochar increases availability and uptake of phosphorus to wheat under leaching conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 52: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1099-3
    [48] Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, et al. (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52: 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00065.x
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(927) PDF downloads(62) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog