Rodent populations in agricultural environments serve as critical reservoirs for zoonotic diseases, posing significant risks to food security and public health. Transmission in these settings is complex, thereby occurring through both direct rodent-to-rodent contacts and indirect exposures to environmental contamination. In this paper, we formulate and analyze a deterministic model that integrates rodent population dynamics with an environmental pathogen compartment. To identify resource-efficient mitigation policies, we develop an optimal control framework that incorporates three time-dependent interventions: contact prevention, environmental sanitation, and treatment. By applying Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, we derive the Hamiltonian, the adjoint system, and the characterization of the optimal controls, and subsequently solve the optimality system using a forward-backward sweep algorithm. We evaluate the epidemiological impact and economic viability of seven distinct intervention strategies using the Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Numerical simulations demonstrate that while the full combination of controls yields the maximum reduction in infection, the prevention-only strategy emerges as the most economically attractive option under restricted budgets. These findings suggest that prioritizing contact-reduction measures provides the most cost-effective basis for disease management, while integrated sanitation and treatments should be scaled based on resource availability. This study provides a quantitative framework that may assist agricultural stakeholders in developing resource-efficient control policies.
Citation: Mahmoud Moustafa. Cost-effectiveness and optimal control analysis of an $ SIR-P $ model for rodent-transmitted infection in agricultural environments[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2026, 23(5): 1251-1268. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2026045
Rodent populations in agricultural environments serve as critical reservoirs for zoonotic diseases, posing significant risks to food security and public health. Transmission in these settings is complex, thereby occurring through both direct rodent-to-rodent contacts and indirect exposures to environmental contamination. In this paper, we formulate and analyze a deterministic model that integrates rodent population dynamics with an environmental pathogen compartment. To identify resource-efficient mitigation policies, we develop an optimal control framework that incorporates three time-dependent interventions: contact prevention, environmental sanitation, and treatment. By applying Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, we derive the Hamiltonian, the adjoint system, and the characterization of the optimal controls, and subsequently solve the optimality system using a forward-backward sweep algorithm. We evaluate the epidemiological impact and economic viability of seven distinct intervention strategies using the Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Numerical simulations demonstrate that while the full combination of controls yields the maximum reduction in infection, the prevention-only strategy emerges as the most economically attractive option under restricted budgets. These findings suggest that prioritizing contact-reduction measures provides the most cost-effective basis for disease management, while integrated sanitation and treatments should be scaled based on resource availability. This study provides a quantitative framework that may assist agricultural stakeholders in developing resource-efficient control policies.
| [1] |
T. Gedeon, C. Bodelon, A. Kuenzi, Hantavirus transmission in sylvan and peridomestic environments, Bull. Math. Biol., 72 (2010), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9460-4 doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9460-4
|
| [2] |
C. B. Jonsson, L. T. M. Figueiredo, O. Vapalahti, A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 23 (2010), 412–441. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00062-09 doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-09
|
| [3] |
G. Abramson, V. M. Kenkre, Spatio-temporal patterns in hantavirus infection, Phys. Rev. E, 66 (2002), 011912. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.011912 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.011912
|
| [4] |
H. W. Hethcote, The mathematics of infectious diseases, SIAM Rev., 42 (2000), 599–653. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500371907 doi: 10.1137/S0036144500371907
|
| [5] |
M. Choisy, P. Rohani, Harvesting can increase severity of wildlife disease epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 273 (2006), 2025–2034. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3554 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3554
|
| [6] |
J. Holt, S. Davis, H. Leirs, A model of leptospirosis infection in an African rodent to determine risk to humans: Seasonal fluctuations and the impact of rodent control, Acta Trop., 99 (2006), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.003
|
| [7] |
M. Voinson, B. V. Broecke, H. Leirs, V. Sluydts, Modeling rodent population and pathogen dynamics in agricultural environments: Assessing the impact of control strategies on disease transmission, Ecol. Modell., 507 (2025), 111168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111168 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111168
|
| [8] |
K. Mokni, M. Ch-Chaoui, Exploring persistence, stability, and bifurcations: A {Darwinian Ricker–Cushing} model, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 13 (2025), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-024-01539-9 doi: 10.1007/s40435-024-01539-9
|
| [9] |
M. Ch-Chaoui, K. Mokni, A discrete evolutionary Beverton–Holt population model, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 11 (2023), 1060–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01035-y doi: 10.1007/s40435-022-01035-y
|
| [10] |
F. M. Yusof, F. A. Abdullah, A. I. Md. Ismail, Modeling and optimal control on the spread of hantavirus infection, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121192 doi: 10.3390/math7121192
|
| [11] |
A. K. Supriatna, H. Napitupulu, M. Z. Ndii, B. Ghosh, R. Kon, A mathematical model for transmission of hantavirus among rodents and its effect on the number of infected humans, Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2023 (2023), 9578283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9578283 doi: 10.1155/2023/9578283
|
| [12] |
Y. Li, Y. Xiao, Effects of nonlinear impulsive controls and seasonality on hantavirus infection, Math. Biosci., 380 (2025), 109378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2025.109378 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2025.109378
|
| [13] |
Y. Alnafisah, M. El-Shahed, Stochastic analysis of a hantavirus infection model, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3756. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203756 doi: 10.3390/math10203756
|
| [14] |
M. Moustafa, F. A. Abdullah, S. Shafie, Z. Ismail, Dynamical behavior of a fractional-order hantavirus infection model incorporating harvesting, Alexandria Eng. J., 61 (2022), 11301–11312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.05.004
|
| [15] | Y. Kuang, Basic properties of mathematical population models, J. Biomath., 17 (2002), 129–142. |
| [16] | L. J. S. Allen, An Introduction to Mathematical Biology, Pearson, 2006. |
| [17] | W. H. Fleming, R. W. Rishel, Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control, Springer Science & Business Media, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6380-7 |
| [18] | S. Lenhart, J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011418 |
| [19] |
E. Jung, S. Lenhart, Z. Feng, Optimal control of treatments in a two-strain tuberculosis model, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. - Ser. B, 2 (2002), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2002.2.473 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2002.2.473
|
| [20] |
P. Rodrigues, C. J. Silva, D. F. M. Torres, Cost-effectiveness analysis of optimal control measures for tuberculosis, Bull. Math. Biol. Z, 76 (2014), 2627–2645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0028-6 doi: 10.1007/s11538-014-0028-6
|
| [21] |
H. W. Berhe, A. A. Gebremeskel, Z. T. Melese, M. Al-Arydah, A. A. Gebremichael, Modeling and global stability analysis of COVID-19 dynamics with optimal control and cost-effectiveness analysis, Partial Differ. Equations Appl. Math., 11 (2024), 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100843 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100843
|