Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Bifurcation analysis and exact solutions for a class of generalized time-space fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations


  • In this work, we focus on a class of generalized time-space fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations arising in mathematical physics. After utilizing the general mapping deformation method and theory of planar dynamical systems with the aid of symbolic computation, abundant new exact complex doubly periodic solutions, solitary wave solutions and rational function solutions are obtained. Some of them are found for the first time and can be degenerated to trigonometric function solutions. Furthermore, by applying the bifurcation theory method, the periodic wave solutions and traveling wave solutions with the corresponding phase orbits are easily obtained. Moreover, some numerical simulations of these solutions are portrayed, showing the novelty and visibility of the dynamical structure and propagation behavior of this model.

    Citation: Baojian Hong. Bifurcation analysis and exact solutions for a class of generalized time-space fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14377-14394. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023643

    Related Papers:

    [1] Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, Brigitte d'Andréa-Novel . On Lyapunov stability of linearised Saint-Venant equations for a sloping channel. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4(2): 177-187. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.177
    [2] Didier Georges . Infinite-dimensional nonlinear predictive control design for open-channel hydraulic systems. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4(2): 267-285. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.267
    [3] Nadia Bedjaoui, Erik Weyer, Georges Bastin . Methods for the localization of a leak in open water channels. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4(2): 189-210. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.189
    [4] Xavier Litrico, Vincent Fromion . Modal decomposition of linearized open channel flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4(2): 325-357. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.325
    [5] Valérie Dos Santos, Bernhard Maschke, Yann Le Gorrec . A Hamiltonian perspective to the stabilization of systems of two conservation laws. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4(2): 249-266. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.249
    [6] Maya Briani, Benedetto Piccoli . Fluvial to torrential phase transition in open canals. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(4): 663-690. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018030
    [7] Nora Aïssiouene, Marie-Odile Bristeau, Edwige Godlewski, Jacques Sainte-Marie . A combined finite volume - finite element scheme for a dispersive shallow water system. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(1): 1-27. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.1
    [8] Georges Bastin, B. Haut, Jean-Michel Coron, Brigitte d'Andréa-Novel . Lyapunov stability analysis of networks of scalar conservation laws. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2(4): 751-759. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.751
    [9] Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Jinyeong Park, Xiongtao Zhang . Uniform stability and mean-field limit for the augmented Kuramoto model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(2): 297-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018013
    [10] Seung-Yeal Ha, Shi Jin, Jinwook Jung . A local sensitivity analysis for the kinetic Kuramoto equation with random inputs. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(2): 317-340. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019013
  • In this work, we focus on a class of generalized time-space fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations arising in mathematical physics. After utilizing the general mapping deformation method and theory of planar dynamical systems with the aid of symbolic computation, abundant new exact complex doubly periodic solutions, solitary wave solutions and rational function solutions are obtained. Some of them are found for the first time and can be degenerated to trigonometric function solutions. Furthermore, by applying the bifurcation theory method, the periodic wave solutions and traveling wave solutions with the corresponding phase orbits are easily obtained. Moreover, some numerical simulations of these solutions are portrayed, showing the novelty and visibility of the dynamical structure and propagation behavior of this model.



    Abbreviations: fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; CFSFSS: the cognitive function status at functional subnetwork scale; AUC: area under the curve; mRMR: minimal Redundancy Maximum Relevance; E-WOA: enhanced whale optimization algorithm; SVR: support vector regression; MAE: mean absolute error; MAPE: mean absolute percentage error; RMSE: root mean square error; NC: normal control; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; AAL: Automated Anatomical Labeling; WOA: whale optimization algorithm; LOO-CV: leave-one-out cross-validation

    End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a severe kidney disorder that significantly impairs kidney function, resulting in an inability to meet the body's metabolic and waste excretion requirements. Approximately 50,000 ESRD patients die annually in the United States [1]. In addition to its impact on physical function, ESRD can have detrimental effects on cognitive function. Cognitive impairment is commonly observed in ESRD patients, with studies reporting that 30 to 70% of individuals with ESRD experience varying degrees of cognitive impairment [2]. This impairment can manifest as memory loss, lack of concentration, executive dysfunction, and other symptoms, significantly affecting their quality of life and daily functioning.

    Cognitive impairment can lead to challenges in medication management, medical decision-making, and treatment adherence among ESRD patients, thereby increasing their healthcare risks [3]. Importantly, cognitive impairment can also impact driving ability, work capacity, and social interactions, posing limitations on the independence and participation of individuals with ESRD in their daily lives [4]. It is crucial to detect cognitive impairment early and implement appropriate interventions for reducing symptoms and enhancing the quality of life for ESRD patients. However, the current diagnosis of cognitive function status primarily relies on scoring measures from assessment scales, which have certain drawbacks.

    Clinicians spend considerable time recording patients' feedback using these scales, and the experience level of the clinician can significantly influence the scores of cognitive function status assessments [5]. Moreover, different biological causes can manifest as the same behavioral phenotype, making diagnosis more challenging [6]. In recent years, advancements in imaging technology and the application of complex network analysis in neuroscience research have provided new perspectives for diagnosing cognitive status [7]. The brain is a complex organ with billions of neurons forming intricate connectivity networks through synapses. The connections between different brain regions can influence cognitive function status [8]. Therefore, studying cognitive function status from the perspective of brain functional networks offers a novel approach to diagnosis.

    We aimed to address the limitations of traditional assessment scales in accurately measuring the cognitive function status of ESRD patients with cognitive impairment. In light of this, a method based on functional subnetwork is proposed to predict the cognitive function status (CFSFSS) of ESRD patients. Unlike previous approaches, we focus on capturing the relationship between nodes and cognitive functional status from the perspective of functional subnetworks. In this study, introduce several key contributions and novel aspects: (a) Subnetwork Construction: Nodes from diverse network indicators are carefully selected, and their connectivity is extracted to construct functional subnetworks. This approach allows us to capture the intricate relationships between nodes and the cognitive functional status of ESRD patients. (b) Enhanced Optimization Algorithm: We employ the enhanced Whale Optimization Algorithm (E-WOA) to optimize the parameters of SVR. This algorithmic approach ensures more accurate parameter optimization, contributing to improved predictive performance. (c) Addressing Limitations: We aimed to overcome the limitations of traditional assessment scales in accurately measuring the cognitive function status of ESRD patients with cognitive impairment. By focusing on functional subnetworks and their connections, we gain a deeper understanding of the important links between cognitive processes and nodes within the networks.

    The rest of this work is organized as follows: Section 2 gives the literature review of the work. Section 3 provides the materials and methods. Section 4 introduces the results of the related work. Sections 5 and 6 present the discussions and conclusions, respectively.

    Numerous studies have investigated the potential of using brain functional networks to understand cognitive processes and predict cognitive function status. Li et al. [9] constructed two brain network models to evaluate the cognitive function in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Zhou et al. [10] proposed a method to assess the structural basis of the functional connectivity (FC) alterations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) by investigating the relationship between FC and structural connectivity (SC) in the default mode network (DMN). Zhang et al. [11] used graph theory to analyze the changes of functional brain networks among patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) with and without cognitive impairment (CI).

    Researchers have also made contributions to explore various approaches for analyzing brain disorders and investigate cognitive impairment in specific conditions. Zhang et al. [12] selected multiple node statistics jointly from brain functional networks for identifying brain disorders. Min et al. [13] computed degree centrality (DC) to investigate the intrinsic dysconnectivity pattern of the brain in post stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) patients. Both methods provided valuable insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of cognitive processes and their implications.

    Previous studies have employed various optimization techniques to enhance the predictive performance of support vector regression (SVR) [14]. Mao et al. [15] considered that grid search plays a part in exploring the parameter space and finding the optimal parameter combination. Zeng et al. [16] proposed a laser ultrasonic detection method using support vector machine based on particle swarm optimization (PSO-SVM) algorithm.

    In this study, we propose a framework for predicting the cognitive function status at the functional subnetwork scale. Functional subnetworks are created by combining nodes from multiple network indicators, allowing for a more comprehensive representation of the complexities and variabilities of brain functional networks. The framework collects topological attribute parameters of functional subnetworks and utilizes the AUC as features. Feature selection is performed by the mRMR. To improve the SVR, the E-WOA is employed to search for optimal parameter combination. This optimization procedure is crucial in addressing the global optimization problem associated with the prediction.

    Previous research in the field has primarily focused on analyzing cognitive function status using global brain functional networks. Alternatively, individual variations in brain structure and function can introduce inaccuracies in interpreting cognitive function status solely based on global networks [17]. While these methods have provided valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive processes, challenges remain in improving the accuracy and reliability of predictions. One limitation of existing approaches is their tendency to converge on local optimal solutions, hindering the identification of the global optimal solution. Some algorithms also suffer from high computational costs or limited exploration of the search space, limiting their effectiveness.

    In contrast, the proposed framework addresses these limitations. By focusing on functional subnetworks, it considers the individual nuances and variabilities of brain functional networks, leading to more precise predictions of cognitive function status. The advanced optimization algorithms, including the E-WOA, improve the search for optimal parameter combination in the SVR, mitigating the issue of converging on local optimal solutions. This significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of the prediction. Table 1 shows the literature review.

    Table 1.  Literature review.
    Years Authors Conclusions Limitations
    2021 D. Zhang, Y. Y. Chen, et al. Using graph theory to analyze the changes of functional brain networks in patients on MHD with and without cognitive impairment. These approaches mainly involve whole-brain functional networks, and there is a lack of studies on the modularity of interindividual brain networks.
    2021 X. Li, C. J. Yang, et al. Constructing two brain network models to evaluate the cognitive function in patients with aMCI.
    2022 B. Zhou, X. J. Dou, et al. Abnormal parts of structural and functional connectivity were found under the default mode network in patients.
    2022 Y. Y. Zhang, Y. F. Xue, et al. Selecting multiple node statistics jointly from brain functional networks for identifying brain disorders. There are challenges in improving the accuracy and reliability of the prediction of cognitive functional status.
    2023 Y. Min, C. Liu, et al. Computing the DC to investigate the intrinsic dysconnectivity pattern of the brain in PSCI patients.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this section, we detail the methods employed in the research. We began with a well-defined framework, then collected important data, extracted features from subnetworks, chose the most significant features, and then optimized the parameters of SVR using the E-WOA. Every stage was essential to our investigation.

    Figure 1 shows the overall research framework of CFSFSS, consisting of the following steps: (a) Preprocessing raw resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images; (b) acquiring time series for all brain regions; (c) constructing brain functional networks with time series; (d) forming functional subnetworks by extraction of the nodes from different network indicators; (e) extracting topological attribute parameters of the functional subnetworks as features; (f) selecting the two most discriminative features by the maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (mRMR); (g) optimizing the parameters of the SVR by the E-WOA; and (h) predicting cognitive function status scores for ESRD patients with cognitive impairment.

    Figure 1.  Research framework of CFSFSS.

    A total of 44 ESRD patients with cognitive impairment were admitted to the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from May 2021 to March 2022. These patients are included in the ESRD group. Among them, there are 20 males and 24 females, with an age range of 34 to 66 years and a mean age of (50.05 ± 7.95) years. In addition, 30 healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations at the hospital during the same period are selected as the normal control (NC) group. The NC group consists of 19 males and 11 females, with an age range of 34 to 63 years and a mean age of (48.37 ± 6.70) years. There are no statistically significant differences in gender distribution, age, or education level between the ESRD group and the NC group (P > 0.05). All participants are right-handed and have no history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, neurological disorders, infectious diseases, or diabetes. There are no contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Prior to fMRI acquisition, trained physicians assessed the subjects' cognitive function status according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. This study is conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration, and is approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the hospital. Table 2 shows the demographic information of the two groups of subjects.

    Table 2.  Demographic information.
    Gender (male/female) Age (years, ˉx±s) Education years(years, ˉx±s) MoCA scores (points, ˉx±s)
    ESRD group 20/24 50.05 ± 7.95 11.25 ± 3.19 21.36 ± 2.42
    NC group 19/11 48.37 ± 6.70 9.73 ± 3.91 27.27 ± 1.26
    p 0.134 0.346 0.071 ***

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Data collection is completed by the GE Discovery MR 750 W 3.0 T superconducting MR scanner equipped with a 32-channel head-neck coil. During the scanning process, the subject's head is fixed with a rubber soft match to avoid artifacts generated by head movement. Since then, the subjects should maintain a static and awake state to avoid thinking activities as much as feasible. Gradient Echo Planar Echo Imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence acquisition fMRI images. The machine scanning parameters are as follows: repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms, echo time (TE) = 40 ms, field of view (FOV) = 24 cm, flip angle (FA) = 90 degrees, matrix size = 64 × 64, and slice thickness = 6 mm.

    The raw data are preprocessed with Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF) on the Matlab platform [18,19]. The specific steps are as follows: (a) Data format conversion: convert the original fMRI scan data from DICOM format to NIfTI format; (b) time point deletion: remove the initial time points accounting for subjects not being in a steady state; (c) slice timing correction: adjust the data from all slices to the same time point to eliminate the influence of temporal differences, as fMRI scans are conducted slice by slice; (d) head motion correction: correct the subject's head position to eliminate the effects of head motion during the scanning process; (e) data format normalization: transform the data to the standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template space to improve comparability across different individuals or studies; (f) data smoothing procession: smooth the data using a convolution Gaussian kernel to boost the signal-to-noise ratio and statistical efficiency; (g) date trends removal: remove linear or non-linear trends in data to eliminate the effects of device drift or other long-term changes during scanning; (h) band-pass filtering: retain a specific frequency range of 0.01–0.08 Hz to eliminate high-frequency noise and low-frequency physiological fluctuations; and (i) time series extraction: divide the brain of each subject into 90 brain regions with the standard segmentation template Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL), and extract the time series for each brain region.

    Functional subnetwork scale can effectively reduce the dimensionality of the data, making predictive models easier to process and understand [20]. The brain functional networks are constructed by the correlation coefficients between the time series of each brain region [21]. Then, the value of each node in the brain functional networks is calculated by the Brain Connectivity Toolbox (BCT) [22]. We consider nodes ranking in the top 20% for node degree, local clustering coefficient, node betweenness centrality, and global efficiency to define functional subnetworks. It ensures a focused set of nodes that has been validated in previous studies [23].

    As shown in Figure 2, functional subnetworks are formed by nodes that satisfy the aforementioned criteria. Next, the AUC of the attribute property parameters for each subnetwork are extracted with the graph theoretical network analysis toolbox (GRETNA), resulting in the feature space S. Among these features are network clustering coefficient (aCp), network gamma (aGamma), network lambda (aLambda), shortest path length (aLp), network sigma (aSigma), network global efficiency (aEg), and network local efficiency (aEloc).

    Figure 2.  Construct the subnetworks and extract the feature.

    The most informative features are identified by mRMR depending on the calculated metrics during the feature selection phase [24]. The dimensionality of the feature space is reduced to guarantee the accuracy and generalization capability of the predictive models. It facilitates the reduction of computational costs associated with data training and prediction [25]. Additionally, high-correlation feature selection can contribute to the interpretation of prediction results [26]. The mRMR is an information-theoretic feature selection method with an objective to identify a set of m features from the feature space S for each subnetwork. These selected features should exhibit high relevance to the target class while minimizing redundancy among themselves. This selection process is guided by the maximum statistical dependency criterion, ensuring that the chosen features possessed maximum information content and are highly informative for the classification task. The definitions of maximum relevance and minimum redundancy are as follows:

    Maximum relevance:

    maxrele(S,o)=1|S|zuSI(zu;o). (1)

    Minimum redundancy:

    minredu(S)=1|S|2zu,zvSI(zu;zv), (2)

    where S is the set of features; o is the target category; I(zu;o) is the mutual information between feature u and target category o; I(zu;zv) is the mutual information between feature u and feature v.

    The whale optimization algorithm (WOA) is a metaheuristic optimization technique that has demonstrated strong performance in a range of optimization problems. It is based on the hunting behavior of humpback whales. First, the WOA can efficiently search the parameter space and identify the optimal or nearly optimal solution due to its high exploration-utilization balance. This skill is essential for the intricate interaction that exists between the cognitive functional status of ESRD patients and features that are taken from functional subnetworks. Furthermore, the WOA has demonstrated its efficacy in addressing high-dimensional nonlinear optimization issues. Our research focuses on picking pertinent features and extracting features from functional subnetworks. The capacity of WOA to handle complicated, high-dimensional data makes it a perfect fit. It has some scalability and has been successfully used in a variety of domains, such as feature selection tasks and biomedical research. The algorithm's performance and optimization abilities can be enhanced by expanding the number of populations and incorporating novel behaviors. We can use this to further refine the algorithm.

    The E-WOA is a variant of the original WOA [27]. It incorporates a shared pool mechanism [28] to store the worst search agents and generate new search agents through migration strategies, enhancing the algorithm's exploration capability. The fitness evaluation of each search agent is performed, and the best search agent is selected as the leader to guide the search process. Multiple search strategies, such as surrounding prey search, priority selection search, and spiral bubble-net attack, are employed to generate new search agents, thereby increasing the search diversity [29]. The inspiration for the E-WOA comes from the feeding behavior of whales, where they create bubble nets to trap prey while diving in a spiral path close to the water surface. Hunting behavior is divided into three stages: Encircling, bubble-net attack, and searching for prey.

    The objective function is defined by specific parameter settings to evaluate SVR performance. A set of search agents representing the SVR parameter set is randomly generated or initialized, and the search agent with the best fitness is selected as the leader.

    Rounding up: The exact location of the prey is unknown in the encircling phase. Once whales detect signs of prey in their surroundings, they initiate an encircling behavior. Assuming the current best search agent is in proximity to the prey, other search agents adjust their positions to align with the best search agent. The mathematical expression for this behavior can be described as follows:

    X(n+1)=X(n)AT, (3)
    T=|CX(n)X(n)|, (4)

    where n is the current number of iterations; X(n) is the best position vector obtained so far; X(n) is the current position vector; A and C are the coefficient vectors.

    Bubble-net attack: Whales include two strategies during the prey attack phase, shrinking the encircling circle and spiral updating mechanism. The selection between bubble-net attack and shrinking the encircling circle is determined by the predation probability p. A logarithmic spiral equation serves to explain the position update between the whales and their prey:

    X(n+1)={X(n)AT,Teglcos(2πl)+X(n),p<0.50.5p<1, (5)
    T=|X(n)X(n)|, (6)

    where g is a constant and l is a random number between zero to one; X(n) is the best location for search agents; As the number of iterations increases, the coefficient vector A gradually decreases, and if |A| is less than one, then the bounding circle gradually tends to the optimal solution.

    Searching for prey: The WOA adjusts the locations of the search agents, ensuring thorough examination of all whales during the encircling phase, by utilizing randomly selected ones. This randomization aims to enhance global search capability, prevent being trapped in local optima [30]. The mathematical expression for this process is as follows:

    X(n+1)=Xrand(n)AT, (7)
    T=|CXrand(n)X(n)|, (8)

    where Xrand(n) is the location of the search agent randomly selected from the current iteration.

    The WOA has some shortcomings even if it exhibits good global search performance and quick convergence time, efficiently avoiding local optima. WOA has strong randomness when updating the whale position, which is easy to lead to premature convergence of the algorithm, and there are problems such as low population diversity and unbalanced search strategy [31].

    Based on the WOA, E-WOA incorporates several enhancements to improve its performance. The primary one is the introduction of a pooling mechanism to store and release the positions of search agents [32]. The worst search agent location was mixed with the current search agent location to increase diversity. It helps to prevent the algorithm from falling into local optimality and improve its ability to explore the search space. The mathematical expression for this mechanism is as follows:

    G(n)=B(n)Xrb(n)+¯B(n)Xworst(n), (9)

    where B(n) is a binary random vector and ¯B(n) is its inverse; Xrb(n) is a randomly generated location near the best search agent in the current iteration; Xworst(n) is the worst position of the search agent in the current iteration.

    Migration search strategy: It entails randomly separating the whale population with an equation, which enhances population variety. Each separated subpopulation covers unexplored areas, reducing the occurrence of getting stuck in local optima. The mathematical expression for this strategy is as follows:

    X(n+1)=Xequal(n)Xrb(n), (10)
    Xequal(n)=l(βmaxβmin)+βmin, (11)

    where Xequal(n) is a random location within the search space calculated by the equation; l is a random number between zero to one; βmax and βmin are the upper and lower bounds of the problem.

    The other one is the incorporation of a priority selection search strategy, where the position of a search agent is updated by selecting the one with the highest fitness value. This aids in the convergence of search agents towards the best position. The mathematical expression for this strategy is as follows:

    X(n+1)=X(n)+A(Cgr1gr2), (12)

    where gr1 and gr2 are random numbers selected from the pooling mechanism; A and C are vectors of coefficients.

    The E-WOA incorporates a spiral bubble-net attack strategy, in which search agents move along a spiral path to converge towards the best position. This strategy helps improve the exploration of the search space and its ability to find the global optimum. The mathematical expression for this strategy is as follows:

    X(n+1)=X(n)AT, (13)
    T=|CX(n)gr3|, (14)

    where X(n) is the best location for search agents; gr3 is a random number selected from the pooling mechanism.

    According to the formulated strategy, the algorithm iteratively searches for the optimal combination of SVR parameters by adjusting the location of the search agent and evaluating its fitness. Through iterative execution of the above steps, the E-WOA is capable of searching for parameter combination with improved fitness to optimize the parameters of the SVR. After a certain number of iterations, the search agent with the best fitness can be selected as the optimal parameter combination for the E-WOA-optimized SVR.

    In this section, we present the experimental design, results, ablation study, and active brain regions analysis to validate the effectiveness of our framework.

    The computed metrics are sorted in descending order to record the respective node IDs. Then, the nodes represented by the top 20% node IDs for each metric are extracted to generate four symmetric matrices, which are named "Sub1,Sub2,Sub3,Sub4" as the four functional subnetworks.

    The functional subnetwork is sparsified by setting the threshold [33]. These thresholds are set in five ranges with a 0.01 step size: 0.1–0.6, 0.2–0.7, 0.3–0.8, 0.4–0.9, and 0.5–1.0. The AUC for small-world features and the overall effectiveness of all individuals are extracted with GRETNA [34]. Among these features are network clustering coefficient (aCp), network gamma (aGamma), network lambda (aLambda), shortest path length (aLp), network sigma (aSigma), network global efficiency (aEg), and network local efficiency (aEloc). The AUC of the two sets of topological attribute parameters differ considerably in the range of 0.2–0.7 across all matrix sparsity threshold ranges, so the matrix sparsity is set in this range.

    Table 3 shows the results of feature selection with mRMR. The features aLp and aSigma are eliminated in Sub1, Sub2, and Sub3, while the features aLp and aGamma are filtered out in Sub4. To maintain the feature consistency, the number of features for Sub4 is increased to three, revealing aSigma as the third feature. As a result, aLp and aSigma are selected as input variables for subsequent prediction analysis, ensuring the comparability and consistency of features.

    Table 3.  Feature selection results in functional subnetworks.
    Subnetwork Feature ESRD group(n = 44) NC group(n = 30) Feature selection results
    Sub1 aCp 0.123 ± 0.027 0.122 ± 0.025
    aGamma 0.605 ± 0.070 0.615 ± 0.068
    aLambda 0.535 ± 0.020 0.544 ± 0.020
    aLp 1.561 ± 0.320 1.574 ± 0.269
    aSigma 0.564 ± 0.063 0.564 ± 0.060
    aEg 0.169 ± 0.039 0.165 ± 0.027
    aEloc 0.195 ± 0.065 0.192 ± 0.045
    Sub2 aCp 0.123 ± 0.027 0.122 ± 0.025
    aGamma 0.604 ± 0.069 0.615 ± 0.069
    aLambda 0.535 ± 0.020 0.544 ± 0.020
    aLp 1.561 ± 0.320 1.574 ± 0.269
    aSigma 0.564 ± 0.062 0.564 ± 0.060
    aEg 0.169 ± 0.039 0.165 ± 0.027
    aEloc 0.195 ± 0.065 0.192 ± 0.045
    Sub3 aCp 0.106 ± 0.022 0.097 ± 0.019
    aGamma 0.595 ± 0.063 0.602 ± 0.051
    aLambda 0.533 ± 0.016 0.533 ± 0.014
    aLp 1.602 ± 0.234 1.631 ± 0.288
    aSigma 0.557 ± 0.056 0.565 ± 0.047
    aEg 0.161 ± 0.027 0.159 ± 0.026
    aEloc 0.186 ± 0.054 0.178 ± 0.043
    Sub4 aCp 0.123 ± 0.025 0.121 ± 0.024
    aGamma 0.611 ± 0.068 0.613 ± 0.074
    aLambda 0.537 ± 0.024 0.546 ± 0.025
    aLp 1.561 ± 0.304 1.587 ± 0.253
    aSigma 0.568 ± 0.062 0.560 ± 0.061
    aEg 0.168 ± 0.035 0.163 ± 0.024
    aEloc 0.193 ± 0.061 0.193 ± 0.043

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Due to the limited sample size, the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) strategy is applied to train different predictive models and evaluate the prediction accuracy [35]. Specifically, in each round of verification, a sample is first eliminated as a test set, and the leftovers are turned into a training set for regression prediction. To begin, the aLp and aSigma values of the ESRD group, along with the MoCA scores of the patients, have been combined into a single dataset. Following that, the dataset is divided into forty-four smaller subsets, with forty-three serving as training sets and one serving as the test set. This procedure is performed on all subsets to ensure that each data point is only for either training or testing, effectively removing data selection randomness. The mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE) are selected as the metrics for evaluating the prediction accuracy [36]. Lower MAE, MAPE, and RMSE values indicate higher prediction accuracy.

    The prediction results at the functional subnetwork scale and global network scale are compared by LOO-CV. Figure 3 shows prediction accuracy for different network modes, where the blue lines representing the real scores and the red lines representing the predicted scores. It indicates that the predictability at the functional subnetwork scale has improved to a certain extent compared to the global network. The overall predicted trends of real and predicted scores at the functional subnetwork scale are closer together than those at the global network scale. Additionally, Sub3 produces closely matched predicted scores with little mistakes, indicating a closer match to the real scores.

    Figure 3.  Prediction accuracy for different network modes.

    Table 4 shows the prediction error values for various network modes. It is clear that Sub3 produces superior prediction results. In terms of prediction accuracy, the functional subnetwork scale clearly outperforms the global network scale. Among them, it demonstrates considerable gains in the metrics of MAE, MAPE and RMSE. For example, the MAE, MAPE, and RMSE of clinical scores at Sub3 are reduced by 0.695, 0.0317 and 0.9261, respectively, compared to the global network. This further confirms the superiority of CFSFSS, which can provide more exact prediction findings, thus improving predict accuracy and efficiency.

    Table 4.  Prediction error values.
    Network mode MAE MAPE RMSE
    Sub1 0.9192 0.0435 1.5453
    Sub2 0.8953 0.0432 1.4971
    Sub3 0.5951 0.0281 0.9994
    Sub4 1.1002 0.0503 1.7101
    Global network 1.2901 0.0598 1.9255

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Inputting selected features into the E-WOA-optimized SVR can learn the correlation between features with stronger recognition. It is more conducive to explore the association between cognitive function status and scores, and improve the accuracy of score prediction. The prediction error values are shown in Figure 4, which were obtained with the WOA-optimized SVR and the E-WOA-optimized SVR for data prediction in Sub3. The E-WOA-optimized SVR predicted MAE, MAPE, and RMSE of clinical scores at Sub3, which are 0.2202, 0.0096, 0.5206 lower than those predicted by the WOA-optimized SVR, respectively. It shows that the E-WOA-optimized SVR can significantly improve the performance of score prediction compared with the WOA-optimized SVR.

    Figure 4.  Prediction error values of the two optimization algorithms in Sub3.

    SVR is a popular and well-respected machine learning algorithm that has been effectively employed for a number of prediction applications, including the prediction of cognitive performance. When compared to other regression methods, SVR has the benefit of being less prone to overfitting and capable of handling non-linear connections between variables. Small sample problems can also be handled with the SVR algorithm. Given the relatively small sample size of the available medical data, the SVR algorithm emerges as the optimal choice. This approach has strong generalization ability and can prevent the dimension disaster.

    We evaluate several common regression prediction methods, including SVR, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and random forest (RF). The prediction error values are taken as a metric to assess the prediction performance across different methods. The results indicate that SVR is more suitable for the data used in this study compared to the other methods, providing more accurate prediction outcomes.

    Figure 5.  Prediction error values of different regression prediction methods.

    We conduct an ablation study to validate CFSFSS in predicting cognitive function status in ESRD patients. Specifically, we evaluate the individual contributions of the functional subnetwork, mRMR feature selection, and E-WOA optimization algorithm by removing them separately. The aim is to assess their impact on prediction performance. As seen from Table 5, CFSFSS predicts cognitive functional status more accurately and with less error.

    Table 5.  Results of ablation experiments.
    Functional subnetwork mRMR feature selection E-WOA optimization MAE MAPE RMSE
    × 1.2689 0.0574 1.9789
    × 1.7230 0.0854 2.2547
    × 1.5836 0.0771 1.9050
    0.5951 0.0281 0.9994

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    According to prediction results, the functional subnetwork extracted based on node betweenness centrality has the highest prediction accuracy. Node betweenness centrality is a measure of the importance of nodes in a network, which measures the degree to which a node acts as an intermediary or bridge in the network [37]. Therefore, eighteen brain regions with the highest node betweenness centrality in all ESRD group are identified, and the brain regions with strong activity are analyzed. Table 6 lists the active brain regions.

    Table 6.  Active brain regions.
    Serial number Brain regions Abbreviations (L: Left, R: Right) Color
    66 Right angular gyrus ANG.R
    14 Right triangular inferior frontal gyrus IFGtriang.R
    38 Right hippocampus HIP.R
    22 Right olfactory cortex OLF.R
    46 Right cuneus CUN.R
    17 Left rolandic operculum ROL.L
    58 Right postcentral gyrus PoCG.R
    16 Right orbital inferior frontal gyrus ORBinf.R
    15 Left orbital inferiorfrontal gyrus ORBinf.L
    72 Right caudate nucleus CAU.R
    29 Left insula INS.L
    24 Right medial superior frontal gyrus SFGmed.R
    36 Right posterior cingulate gyrus PCG.R
    2 Right precental gyrus PreCG.R
    54 Right inferior occipital gyrus IOG.R
    67 Left precuneus PCUN.L
    60 Right superior parietal gyrus SPG.R
    35 Left posterior cingulate gyrus PCG.L

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The BrainNet Viewer toolbox [38] is adopted to visualize the active brain regions in the ESRD group and map them onto the ICBM152 template. Figure 6 shows the visualization results. As seen from the figure, most brain regions extracted according to the highest node betweenness centrality are distributed in the right side, including the right hippocampus (HIP.R), the right cuneus (CUN.R), the right posterior central gyrus (PoCG.R), the right posterior cingulate gyrus (PCG.R), and others. These brain regions play specific roles in different cognitive functions and neural processes, collectively contributing to cognition and functionality in the brain [39]. On the left hemisphere, there are brain regions such as the left insula (INS.L), left precuneus (PCUN.L), left postcentral gyrus (PCG.L), among others. They are involved in multiple cognitive and emotional processes, related to social cognition, spatial perception, attention, and working memory [40]. These brain regions are closely associated with the cognitive function status of the ESRD patients with cognitive impairment.

    Figure 6.  Distribution of active brain regions.

    We investigate the functional brain networks of ESRD patients accompanied by cognitive impairment. It explores the relationship between functional subnetwork scale determined by nodes from different network indicators and cognitive function status. A predictive model for MoCA scores is constructed by applying the AUC of the topological attribute parameters at the functional subnetwork scale. The features are carefully selected to enhance feature correlation learning and recognition through the E-WOA-optimized SVR, contributing to improve the performance in our study. The E-WOA-optimized SVR consistently yield lower prediction error values in Sub3 compared to the WOA-optimized SVR, achieving the optimal effect of prediction. These results highlight the enhanced performance of the E-WOA-optimized SVR in predicting clinical scores and demonstrate its potential for improved cognitive function assessment in ESRD patients.

    The alterations in brain functional networks between the ESRD group and the NC group are uncovered through the analysis conducted by the functional subnetworks. It is discovered that the connectivity between brain regions have a complex and diverse impact on cognitive function status according to the topological attribute parameters at different functional subnetwork scales [41]. On one hand, connectivity can facilitate information transmission and coordination, thereby supporting the execution of different cognitive function. On the other hand, connectivity can also affect the regulation and manifestation of cognitive function such as attention, memory, and emotion [42]. In ESRD patients with cognitive impairment, the prefrontal lobe rete centrality index related to cognitive control is decreased, while the cingulate subnetwork centrality index related to emotional regulation shows a significant increase [43]. The results indicate that ESRD patients have notable abnormalities in cognitive control and emotional regulation, which may affect the psychological and behavioral status of patients [44].

    It is worth mentioning that we find that patients have higher global efficiency and poorer local efficiency in the entire brain functional network. This indicates that the network's overall operation was more efficient. The information flow between local nodes in the ESRD group is relatively weaker than that in the NC group. These findings suggest that changes in the brain functional network of ESRD patients with cognitive impairment, which may be related to the disease course and pathophysiological mechanism of patients [45]. In the future, we will explore the mechanism of the influence of connections between different brain regions on cognitive function status, and propose more refined hypotheses and predictive models. It is possible to predict the cognitive function status of the patients with cognitive impairment more accurately by exploring the topological attribute parameters at functional subnetwork scale.

    In summary, we proposed a method to predict the cognitive function status in the patients with ESRD at functional subnetwork scale (CFSFSS). The functional subnetworks formed by nodes based on different network indicators yield varying results in predicting cognitive function status. The prediction accuracy is improved by analyzing the functional subnetworks extracted from different network indicators and introducing the E-WOA to optimize the parameters of the SVR. The proposed method is validated on the existing dataset, with the MAE, MAPE, and RMSE of the prediction results amounting to 0.5951, 0.0281 and 0.9994, respectively. We further measure the node betweenness centrality as an indicator of cognitive function status that has certain value in evaluating cognitive function status.

    The proposed method involving functional subnetworks, network indicators, and the E-WOA optimization technique showcases promising results in predicting cognitive function status in patients with ESRD. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of this study, such as the restricted number of samples in the dataset. Future research endeavors should focus on expanding the sample size and conducting multi-center studies to validate the broader applicability of the proposed method in a diverse patient population. Additionally, we use a cross-sectional study than a longitudinal study. Longitudinal studies with bigger samples should be conducted in the future to track cognitive function status and topological alterations at functional subnetwork scale, with the goal of gaining a deeper understanding of their relationship. Such efforts have the potential to offer valuable insights into cognitive impairment in ESRD patients and contribute to the optimization of treatment strategies.

    The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 51877013), and Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (grant No. BE2021636). This work was also sponsored by Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province.

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.
    [2] R. Hilfer, Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, Academic Press, Orlando, 1999.
    [3] M. S. Tavazoei, M. Haeri, S. Jafari, S. Bolouki, M. Siami, Some applications of fractional calculus in suppression of chaotic oscillations, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 55 (2008), 4094–4101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.925774 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.925774
    [4] L. Acedo, S. B. Yuste, K. Lindenberg, Reaction front in an a+b→c reaction-subdiffusion process, Phys. Rev. E, 69 (2004), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.036126 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.036126
    [5] D. A. Benson, S. W. Wheatcraft, M. M. Meerschaert, The fractional-order governing equation of lévy motion, Water Resour. Res., 36 (2000), 1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900032 doi: 10.1029/2000WR900032
    [6] J. H. He, Fractal calculus and its geometrical explanation, Results Phys., 10 (2018), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.06.011
    [7] J. H. He, A modified Li-He's variational principle for plasma, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 31 (2021), 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-06-2019-0523 doi: 10.1108/HFF-06-2019-0523
    [8] D. D. Dai, T. T. Ban, Y. L. Wang, W. Zhang, The piecewise reproducing kernel method for the time variable fractional order advection-reaction-diffusion equations, Therm. Sci., 25 (2021), 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200302021D doi: 10.2298/TSCI200302021D
    [9] Q. T. Ain, J. H. He, N. Anjum, M. Ali, The Fractional complex transform: A novel approach to the time fractional Schrödinger equation, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2050141. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20501418 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20501418
    [10] D. C. Lu, B. J. Hong, Bäcklund transformation and n-soliton-like solutions to the combined KdV-Burgers equation with variable coefficients, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci., 1 (2006), 3–10.
    [11] V. A. Matveev, M. A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00922-2
    [12] J. J. Fang, D. S. Mou, H. C. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang, Discrete fractional soliton dynamics of the fractional Ablowitz-Ladik model, Optik, 228 (2021), 166186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166186 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166186
    [13] B. J. Hong, D. C. Lu, New exact Jacobi elliptic function solutions for the coupled Schrödinger-Boussinesq equations, J. Appl. Math., 2013 (2013), 170835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/170835 doi: 10.1155/2013/170835
    [14] D. C. Lu, B. J. Hong, L. X. Tian, New explicit exact solutions for the generalized coupled Hirota-Satsuma KdV system, Comput. Math. Appl., 53 (2007), 1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.047 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.047
    [15] B. J. Hong, New Jacobi elliptic functions solutions for the variable-coefficient mKdV equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 215 (2009), 2908–2913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.09.035 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.09.035
    [16] S. K. Mohanty, O. V. Kravchenko, A. N. Dev, Exact traveling wave solutions of the Schamel Burgers equation by using generalized-improved and generalized G'/G -expansion methods, Results Phys., 33 (2022), 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105124 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105124
    [17] P. R. Kundu, M. R. A. Fahim, M. E. Islam, M. A. Akbar, The sine-Gordon expansion method for higher-dimensional NLEEs and parametric analysis, Heliyon, 7 (2021), e06459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06459 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06459
    [18] S. M. Mirhosseini-Alizamini, N. Ullah, J. Sabi'u, H. Rezazadeh, M. Inc, New exact solutions for nonlinear Atangana conformable Boussinesq-like equations by new Kudryashov method, Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 35 (2021), 2150163. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979221501630 doi: 10.1142/S0217979221501630
    [19] S. Zhang, H. Q. Zhang, Fractional sub-equation method and its applications to nonlinear fractional PDEs, Phys. Lett. A, 375 (2011), 1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.01.029 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.01.029
    [20] B. Xu, Y. F. Zhang, S. Zhang, Line soliton interactions for shallow ocean-waves and novel solutions with peakon, ring, conical, columnar and lump structures based on fractional KP equation, Adv. Math. Phys., 2021 (2021), 6664039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6664039
    [21] B. Xu, S. Zhang, Riemann-Hilbert approach for constructing analytical solutions and conservation laws of a local time-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 13091593. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091593 doi: 10.3390/sym13091593
    [22] Y. Y. Gu, L. W. Liao, Closed form solutions of Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation in nonlinear fiber optics involving the beta derivatives, Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 36 (2022), 2250116. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222501168
    [23] Y. Y. Gu, N. Aminakbari, Bernoulli (G'/G)-expansion method for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with third-order dispersion, Modern Phys. Lett. B, 36 (2022), 2250028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02807-0 doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-02807-0
    [24] S. Zhang, Y. Y. Wei, B. Xu, Fractional soliton dynamics and spectral transform of time-fractional nonlinear systems: an concrete example, Complexity, 2019 (2019), 7952871. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7952871 doi: 10.1155/2019/7952871
    [25] K. L. Geng, D. S. Mou, C. Q. Dai, Nondegenerate solitons of 2-coupled mixed derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07833-5 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07833-5
    [26] W. B. Bo, R. R. Wang, Y. Fang, Y. Y. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Prediction and dynamical evolution of multipole soliton families in fractional Schrödinger equation with the PT-symmetric potential and saturable nonlinearity, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 1577–1588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07884-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07884-8
    [27] R. R. Wang, Y. Y. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Influence of higher-order nonlinear effects on optical solitons of the complex Swift-Hohenberg model in the mode-locked fiber laser, Opt. Laser Technol., 152 (2022), 108103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108103 doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108103
    [28] S. L. He, B. A. Malomed, D. Mihalache, X. Peng, X. Yu, Y. J. He, et al., Propagation dynamics of abruptly autofocusing circular Airy Gaussian vortex beams in the fractional Schrödinger equation, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 142 (2021), 110470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110470 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110470
    [29] S. L. He, Z. W. Mo, J. L. Tu, Z. L. Lu, Y. Zhang, X. Peng, et al., Chirped Lommel Gaussian vortex beams in strongly nonlocal nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations, Results Phys., 42 (2022), 106014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106014 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106014
    [30] R. K. Dodd, J. C. Eilbeck, J. D. Gibbon, H. C. Morris, Solitons and Nonlinear Wave Equations, Academic Press, London-New York, 1982.
    [31] M. Levy, Parabolic Equation Methods for Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE), London, 2000.
    [32] A. Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Des., 6 (1998), 38298. https://doi.org/10.1155/1998/38298 doi: 10.1155/1998/38298
    [33] Y. S. Kivshar, G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals, Academic Press, New York, 2003.
    [34] F. D. Tappert, The Parabolic Approximation Method, Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-08527-0_5
    [35] M. Hosseininia, M. H. Heydari, C. Cattani, N. Khanna, A wavelet method for nonlinear variable-order time fractional 2D Schrödinger equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 14 (2021), 2273–2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.06.008
    [36] A. Somayeh, N. Mohammad, Exact solitary wave solutions of the complex nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Opt. Int. J. Light Electron. Opt., 127 (2016), 4682–4688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.008
    [37] M. A. E. Herzallah, K. A. Gepreel, Approximate solution to the time–space fractional cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Math. Modell., 36 (2012), 5678–5685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.012 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.012
    [38] H. Gündodu, M. F. Gzükzl, Cubic nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation with conformable derivative and its new travelling wave solutions, J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech., 20 (2021), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2021.2.03 doi: 10.17512/jamcm.2021.2.03
    [39] A. M. Wazwaz, A study on linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations by the variational iteration method, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 37 (2008), 1136–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.009
    [40] A. Hasegawa, F. Tappert, Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical pulses in dispersive dielectric fibers. Ⅱ. Normal dispersion, Appl. Phys. Lett., 23 (1973), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1654836 doi: 10.1063/1.1654836
    [41] A. Ebaid, S. M. Khaled, New types of exact solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic nonlinearity, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.09.024 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.09.024
    [42] A. Demir, M. A. Bayrak, E. Ozbilge, New approaches for the solution of space-time fractional Schrödinger equation, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2020 (2020), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02581-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02581-5
    [43] N. A. Kudryashov, Method for finding optical solitons of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Opt. Int. J. Light Electron. Opt., 261 (2022), 169163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169163 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169163
    [44] B. Ghanbari, K. S. Nisar, M. Aldhaifallah, Abundant solitary wave solutions to an extended nonlinear Schrödinger equation with conformable derivative using an efficient integration method, Adv. Differ. Equations, 328 (2020), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02787-7 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02787-7
    [45] M. T. Darvishi, M. Najafi, A. M. Wazwaz, Conformable space-time fractional nonlinear (1+1)- dimensional Schrödinger-type models and their traveling wave solutions, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 150 (2021), 111187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111187 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111187
    [46] T. Mathanaranjan, Optical singular and dark solitons to the (2+1)-dimensional time-space fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103870 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103870
    [47] Y. X. Chen, X. Xiao, Z. L. Mei, Optical soliton solutions of the (1+1)-dimensional space-time fractional single and coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Results Phys., 18 (2020), 103211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103211 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103211
    [48] E. K. Jaradat, O. Alomari, M. Abudayah, A. Al-Faqih, An approximate analytical solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic oscillator using homotopy perturbation method and Laplace-Adomian decomposition method, Adv. Math. Phys., 2018 (2018), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6765021 doi: 10.1155/2018/6765021
    [49] M. G. Sakar, F. Erdogan, A. Yzldzrzm, Variational iteration method for the time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 63 (2012), 1382–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.031 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.031
    [50] G. Jumarie, Table of some basic fractional calculus formulae derived from a modified Riemann-Liouville derivative for non-differentiable functions, Appl. Math. Lett., 22 (2009), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2008.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.06.003
    [51] B. J. Hong, D. C. Lu, W. Chen, Exact and approximate solutions for the fractional Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients, Adv. Differ. Equations, 2019 (2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2313-z doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2313-z
    [52] B. J. Hong, D. C. Lu, New exact solutions for the generalized variable-coefficient Gardner equation with forcing term, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2732–2738 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.104 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.104
    [53] B. J. Hong, New exact Jacobi elliptic functions solutions for the generalized coupled Hirota-Satsuma KdV system, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2010), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.05.079 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2010.05.079
    [54] J. H. He, S. K. Elagan, Z. B. Li, Geometrical explanation of the fractional complex transform and derivative chain rule for fractional calculus, Phys. Lett. A, 376 (2012), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.030 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.030
    [55] Z. B. Li, J. H. He, Fractional complex transformation for fractional differential equation, Math. Comput. Appl., 15 (2010), 970–973. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca15050970 doi: 10.3390/mca15050970
    [56] A. Ebaid, E. H. Aly, Exact solutions for the transformed reduced Ostrovsky equation via the F-expansion method in terms of Weierstrass-elliptic and Jacobian-elliptic functions, Wave Motion, 49 (2012), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2011.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2011.11.003
    [57] M. H. Bashar, S. M. R. Islam, Exact solutions to the (2+1)-Dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation by using modifified simple equation and improve F-expansion methods, Phys. Open, 5 (2020), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2020.100027 doi: 10.1016/j.physo.2020.100027
    [58] C. Scipio, An invariant set in energy space for supercritical NLS in 1D, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 352 (2009), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.023
    [59] L. J. Zhang, P. Y. Yuan, J. L. Fu, C. M. Khalique, Bifurcations and exact traveling wave solutions of the Zakharov-Rubenchik equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. S, 13 (2018), 2927–2939. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020214 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020214
    [60] G. A. Xu, Y. Zhan, J. B. Li, Exact solitary wave and periodic-peakon solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation: Dynamical system approach, Math. Comput. Simul., 191 (2022), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.007
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mamadou Diagne, Shu-Xia Tang, Ababacar Diagne, Miroslav Krstic, Control of shallow waves of two unmixed fluids by backstepping, 2017, 44, 13675788, 211, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.003
    2. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, Amaury Hayat, Peipei Shang, Boundary feedback stabilization of hydraulic jumps, 2019, 7, 24686018, 100026, 10.1016/j.ifacsc.2019.100026
    3. Ben Mansour Dia, Exponential stability of shallow water equations with arbitrary time dependent action, 2014, 2, 2195-268X, 247, 10.1007/s40435-014-0056-y
    4. Mathias Dus, Francesco Ferrante, Christophe Prieur, Spectral stabilization of linear transport equations with boundary and in-domain couplings, 2022, 360, 1778-3569, 219, 10.5802/crmath.288
    5. Simone Göttlich, Peter Schillen, Numerical discretization of boundary control problems for systems of balance laws: Feedback stabilization, 2017, 35, 09473580, 11, 10.1016/j.ejcon.2017.02.002
    6. Rasha Al Jamal, Nejib Smaoui, A single bounded input‐feedback control to the generalized Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers–Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 2222, 10.1002/mma.8640
    7. Felipe Castillo, Emmanuel Witrant, Christophe Prieur, Vincent Talon, Luc Dugard, Fresh Air Fraction Control in Engines Using Dynamic Boundary Stabilization of LPV Hyperbolic Systems, 2015, 23, 1063-6536, 963, 10.1109/TCST.2014.2356858
    8. Alexandre Janon, Maëlle Nodet, Christophe Prieur, Clémentine Prieur, Global sensitivity analysis for the boundary control of an open channel, 2016, 28, 0932-4194, 10.1007/s00498-015-0151-4
    9. Mapundi K. Banda, Axel-Stefan Häck, Michael Herty, Numerical Discretization of Coupling Conditions by High-Order Schemes, 2016, 69, 0885-7474, 122, 10.1007/s10915-016-0185-x
    10. Michael Schuster, Elisa Strauch, Martin Gugat, Jens Lang, Probabilistic constrained optimization on flow networks, 2022, 23, 1389-4420, 1, 10.1007/s11081-021-09619-x
    11. R. Aloev, I. Abdullah, A. Akbarova, S. H. Juraev, 2023, 2484, 0094-243X, 030011, 10.1063/5.0112851
    12. Serge Nicaise, Stability results of some first order viscous hyperbolic systems, 2019, 25, 1292-8119, 33, 10.1051/cocv/2018020
    13. Iasson Karafyllis, Miroslav Krstic, 2022, Spill-Free Transfer and Stabilization of Viscous Liquid, 978-1-6654-5196-3, 2385, 10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867470
    14. Enrique Zuazua, 2013, Chapter 9, 978-3-642-32159-7, 463, 10.1007/978-3-642-32160-3_9
    15. Dong-Xia Zhao, Jun-Min Wang, 2013, On the stabilization of an irrigation channel with a cascade of 2 pools: A linearized case, 978-1-4673-5769-2, 1, 10.1109/ASCC.2013.6606160
    16. Rasha al Jamal, Kirsten Morris, 2015, Distributed control of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation using approximations, 978-1-4799-8684-2, 3322, 10.1109/ACC.2015.7171845
    17. Iasson Karafyllis, Miroslav Krstic, Spill-Free Transfer and Stabilization of Viscous Liquid, 2022, 67, 0018-9286, 4585, 10.1109/TAC.2022.3162551
    18. Mapundi K. Banda, Gediyon Y. Weldegiyorgis, Numerical boundary feedback stabilisation of non-uniform hyperbolic systems of balance laws, 2020, 93, 0020-7179, 1428, 10.1080/00207179.2018.1509133
    19. Van Thang Pham, Didier Georges, Gildas Besancon, 2012, Predictive Control with terminal constraint for 2×2 hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, 978-1-4673-2066-5, 6412, 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426538
    20. Markus Dick, Martin Gugat, Gunter Leugering, 2012, Feedback stabilization of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with varying delays, 978-1-4673-2124-2, 125, 10.1109/MMAR.2012.6347931
    21. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, Simona Oana Tamasoiu, Stability of linear density-flow hyperbolic systems under PI boundary control, 2015, 53, 00051098, 37, 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.12.025
    22. Mathias Dus, The discretized backstepping method: An application to a general system of 2×2 linear balance laws, 2023, 13, 2156-8472, 500, 10.3934/mcrf.2022006
    23. Boussad Hamroun, Alexandru Dimofte, Laurent Lefèvre, Eduardo Mendes, Control by Interconnection and Energy-Shaping Methods of Port Hamiltonian Models. Application to the Shallow Water Equations, 2010, 16, 09473580, 545, 10.3166/ejc.16.545-563
    24. Felipe Castillo, Emmanuel Witrant, Christophe Prieur, Luc Dugard, 2016, Chapter 9, 978-3-319-26367-0, 169, 10.1007/978-3-319-26369-4_9
    25. Mouhamadou Samsidy Goudiaby, Abdou Sene, Gunilla Kreiss, A delayed feedback control for network of open canals, 2013, 1, 2195-268X, 316, 10.1007/s40435-013-0028-7
    26. Van Thang Pham, Didier Georges, Gildas Besançon, Infinite-Dimensional Predictive Control for Hyperbolic Systems, 2014, 52, 0363-0129, 3592, 10.1137/110838200
    27. Martin Gugat, Vincent Perrollaz, Lionel Rosier, Boundary stabilization of quasilinear hyperbolic systems of balance laws: exponential decay for small source terms, 2018, 18, 1424-3199, 1471, 10.1007/s00028-018-0449-z
    28. Pierre-Olivier Lamare, Antoine Girard, Christophe Prieur, Switching Rules for Stabilization of Linear Systems of Conservation Laws, 2015, 53, 0363-0129, 1599, 10.1137/140953952
    29. Alexandre Janon, Maelle Nodet, Christophe Prieur, Clementine Prieur, 2014, Global sensitivity analysis for the boundary control of an open channel, 978-1-4673-6090-6, 589, 10.1109/CDC.2014.7039445
    30. Genqi Xu, Min Li, Stability of Wave Networks on Elastic and Viscoelastic Media, 2021, 175, 0167-8019, 10.1007/s10440-021-00437-y
    31. Christophe Prieur, Aneel Tanwani, 2017, Chapter 8, 978-3-319-51297-6, 201, 10.1007/978-3-319-51298-3_8
    32. Alexandre Bayen, Maria Laura Delle Monache, Mauro Garavello, Paola Goatin, Benedetto Piccoli, 2022, Chapter 2, 978-3-030-93014-1, 5, 10.1007/978-3-030-93015-8_2
    33. Vincent Perrollaz, Asymptotic stabilization of entropy solutions to scalar conservation laws through a stationary feedback law, 2013, 30, 0294-1449, 879, 10.1016/j.anihpc.2012.12.003
    34. Ngoc-Tu Trinh, Vincent Andrieu, Cheng-Zhong Xu, Boundary PI controllers for a star-shaped network of 2 × 2 systems governed by hyperbolic partial differential equations, 2017, 50, 24058963, 7070, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1354
    35. Peng Qu, Time-periodic solutions to quasilinear hyperbolic systems with time-periodic boundary conditions, 2020, 139, 00217824, 356, 10.1016/j.matpur.2019.10.010
    36. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, Further results on boundary feedback stabilisation of 2 × 2 hyperbolic systems over a bounded interval, 2010, 43, 14746670, 1081, 10.3182/20100901-3-IT-2016.00167
    37. Martin Gugat, Rüdiger Schultz, Boundary Feedback Stabilization of the Isothermal Euler Equations with Uncertain Boundary Data, 2018, 56, 0363-0129, 1491, 10.1137/16M1090156
    38. Ngoc-Tu Trinh, Vincent Andrieu, Cheng-Zhong Xu, Output regulation for a cascaded network of 2 × 2 hyperbolic systems with PI controller, 2018, 91, 00051098, 270, 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.01.010
    39. Martin Gugat, Falk M. Hante, On the Turnpike Phenomenon for Optimal Boundary Control Problems with Hyperbolic Systems, 2019, 57, 0363-0129, 264, 10.1137/17M1134470
    40. F. Castillo, E. Witrant, L. Dugard, Dynamic Boundary Stabilization of Linear Parameter Varying Hyperbolic Systems: Application to a Poiseuille Flow, 2013, 46, 14746670, 349, 10.3182/20130204-3-FR-4031.00071
    41. Christophe Prieur, Frédéric Mazenc, ISS-Lyapunov functions for time-varying hyperbolic systems of balance laws, 2012, 24, 0932-4194, 111, 10.1007/s00498-012-0074-2
    42. Thang V. Pham, Didier Georges, Gildas Besançon, On the Use of a Global Control Lyapunov Functional in Infinite-dimensional Predictive Control, 2010, 43, 14746670, 363, 10.3182/20100915-3-IT-2017.00055
    43. Mathias Dus, BV Exponential Stability for Systems of Scalar Conservation Laws Using Saturated Controls, 2021, 59, 0363-0129, 1656, 10.1137/20M1323837
    44. Florent Di Meglio, Federico Bribiesca Argomedo, Long Hu, Miroslav Krstic, Stabilization of coupled linear heterodirectional hyperbolic PDE–ODE systems, 2018, 87, 00051098, 281, 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.09.027
    45. Iasson Karafyllis, Filippos Vokos, Miroslav Krstic, Feedback Stabilization of Tank-Liquid System with Robustness to Wall Friction, 2022, 28, 1292-8119, 81, 10.1051/cocv/2022076
    46. Corentin Briat, 2015, Chapter 4, 978-3-662-44049-0, 123, 10.1007/978-3-662-44050-6_4
    47. Amaury Hayat, Peipei Shang, Exponential stability of density-velocity systems with boundary conditions and source term for the H2 norm, 2021, 153, 00217824, 187, 10.1016/j.matpur.2021.07.001
    48. Jean-Michel Coron, Amaury Hayat, Shengquan Xiang, Christophe Zhang, Stabilization of the Linearized Water Tank System, 2022, 244, 0003-9527, 1019, 10.1007/s00205-022-01778-0
    49. Aziza Akbarova, 2021, 2365, 0094-243X, 020026, 10.1063/5.0056878
    50. 2009, Chapter 1, 978-1-84882-623-6, 1, 10.1007/978-1-84882-624-3_1
    51. Simone Göttlich, Peter Schillen, Numerical Feedback Stabilization with Applications to Networks, 2017, 2017, 1026-0226, 1, 10.1155/2017/6896153
    52. Martin Gugat, Michael Herty, 2022, 23, 9780323850599, 59, 10.1016/bs.hna.2021.12.002
    53. Iasson Karafyllis, Filippos Vokos, Miroslav Krstic, Output-feedback control of viscous liquid–tank system and its numerical approximation, 2023, 149, 00051098, 110827, 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110827
    54. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, Amaury Hayat, Peipei Shang, Exponential boundary feedback stabilization of a shock steady state for the inviscid Burgers equation, 2019, 29, 0218-2025, 271, 10.1142/S021820251950009X
    55. Ying Tang, Christophe Prieur, Antoine Girard, 2014, Boundary control synthesis for hyperbolic systems: A singular perturbation approach, 978-1-4673-6090-6, 2840, 10.1109/CDC.2014.7039825
    56. Ben Mansour Dia, Jesper Oppelstrup, Stabilizing local boundary conditions for two-dimensional shallow water equations, 2018, 10, 1687-8140, 168781401772695, 10.1177/1687814017726953
    57. Amaury Hayat, Boundary stabilization of 1D hyperbolic systems, 2021, 52, 13675788, 222, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.10.009
    58. Rasha al Jamal, Kirsten Morris, Linearized Stability of Partial Differential Equations with Application to Stabilization of the Kuramoto--Sivashinsky Equation, 2018, 56, 0363-0129, 120, 10.1137/140993417
    59. Felipe Castillo, Emmanuel Witrant, Christophe Prieur, Luc Dugard, 2012, Dynamic boundary stabilization of linear and quasi-linear hyperbolic systems, 978-1-4673-2066-5, 2952, 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426802
    60. Simone Göttlich, Michael Herty, Gediyon Weldegiyorgis, Input-to-State Stability of a Scalar Conservation Law with Nonlocal Velocity, 2021, 10, 2075-1680, 12, 10.3390/axioms10010012
    61. Dong-xia Zhao, Dong-xia Fan, Ya-ping Guo, The Spectral Analysis and Exponential Stability of a 1-d 2 × 2 Hyperbolic System with Proportional Feedback Control, 2022, 20, 1598-6446, 2633, 10.1007/s12555-021-0507-0
    62. Amaury Hayat, Peipei Shang, A quadratic Lyapunov function for Saint-Venant equations with arbitrary friction and space-varying slope, 2019, 100, 00051098, 52, 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.10.035
    63. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, On boundary feedback stabilization of non-uniform linear hyperbolic systems over a bounded interval, 2011, 60, 01676911, 900, 10.1016/j.sysconle.2011.07.008
    64. Michael Herty, Hui Yu, 2016, Boundary stabilization of hyperbolic conservation laws using conservative finite volume schemes, 978-1-5090-1837-6, 5577, 10.1109/CDC.2016.7799126
    65. Martin Gugat, Contamination Source Determination in Water Distribution Networks, 2012, 72, 0036-1399, 1772, 10.1137/110859269
    66. Marta Strani, Existence and uniqueness of a positive connection for the scalar viscous shallow water system in a bounded interval, 2014, 13, 1534-0392, 1653, 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1653
    67. Ferdinand Thein, Stabilization of a Multi‐Dimensional System of Hyperbolic Balance Laws – A Case Study, 2023, 22, 1617-7061, 10.1002/pamm.202200056
    68. Georges Bastin, Jean-Michel Coron, 2016, Chapter 1, 978-3-319-32060-1, 1, 10.1007/978-3-319-32062-5_1
    69. Florent Di Meglio, Rafael Vazquez, Miroslav Krstic, Stabilization of a System of n+1 Coupled First-Order Hyperbolic Linear PDEs With a Single Boundary Input, 2013, 58, 0018-9286, 3097, 10.1109/TAC.2013.2274723
    70. Andre F. Caldeira, Christophe Prieur, Daniel Coutinho, Valter J. S. Leite, 2015, Modeling and control of flow with dynamical boundary actions, 978-1-4799-7787-1, 1579, 10.1109/CCA.2015.7320835
    71. Martin Gugat, Michaël Herty, Existence of classical solutions and feedback stabilization for the flow in gas networks, 2011, 17, 1292-8119, 28, 10.1051/cocv/2009035
    72. Fatemeh Zarmehi, Ali Tavakoli, Majid Rahimpour, On numerical stabilization in the solution of Saint-Venant equations using the finite element method, 2011, 62, 08981221, 1957, 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.06.039
    73. Markus Dick, Martin Gugat, Michael Herty, Günter Leugering, Sonja Steffensen, Ke Wang, 2014, Chapter 31, 978-3-319-05082-9, 487, 10.1007/978-3-319-05083-6_31
    74. B. Hamroun, L. Lefèvre, E. Mendes, Energy shaping based control for open irrigation channel using a reduced port hamiltonian model, 2010, 43, 14746670, 855, 10.3182/20100901-3-IT-2016.00196
    75. Iasson Karafyllis, Miroslav Krstic, Control of a Linearized Viscous Liquid–Tank System with Surface Tension, 2024, 62, 0363-0129, 1034, 10.1137/23M158749X
    76. Michael Herty, Ferdinand Thein, Boundary feedback control for hyperbolic systems, 2024, 30, 1292-8119, 71, 10.1051/cocv/2024062
    77. Abdumauvlen Berdyshev, Rakhmatillo Aloev, Zhanars Abdiramanov, Mohinur Ovlayeva, An Explicit–Implicit Upwind Difference Splitting Scheme in Directions for a Mixed Boundary Control Problem for a Two-Dimensional Symmetric t-Hyperbolic System, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1863, 10.3390/sym15101863
    78. S.S. Beknazarova, S.X. Abdullayev, O.S. Abdullayeva, Z.S. Abdullayev, Shahriyor Sadullozoda, Ramazona Abdullozoda, 2024, Methods of increasing the contrast of images in video information systems, 9781510674486, 32, 10.1117/12.3025016
    79. Buse Tacal Ucun, Şeref Naci Engin, Towards optimizing canal system operations: Extremum-seeking controller design via a frequency-based control approach, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102832, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102832
    80. Rakhmatillo Aloev, Abdumauvlen Berdyshev, 2023, 2746, 0094-243X, 060003, 10.1063/5.0152270
    81. Amaury Hayat, Yating Hu, Peipei Shang, PI Control for the Cascade Channels Modeled by General Saint-Venant Equations, 2024, 69, 0018-9286, 4974, 10.1109/TAC.2023.3341767
    82. Rakhmatillo Djuraevich Aloev, Abdumauvlen Suleimanovich Berdyshev, Vasila Alimova, Kymbat Slamovna Bekenayeva, Exponential Stability of the Numerical Solution of a Hyperbolic System with Nonlocal Characteristic Velocities, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 334, 10.3390/axioms13050334
    83. Rakhmatillo Aloev, Aziza Akbarova, Ram Jiwari, Vikas Kumar, 2023, 2746, 0094-243X, 060002, 10.1063/5.0152242
    84. R. D. Aloev, M. U. Khudoyberganov, Implicit Upwind Difference Scheme for a Symmetric t-Hyperbolic System with Variable Coefficients and Lowest Terms, 2023, 44, 1995-0802, 510, 10.1134/S1995080223020075
    85. R. Al Jamal, N. Smaoui, A single actuator vs. multi-actuator design of an input-feedback control for the generalized Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation, 2023, 111, 0924-090X, 19371, 10.1007/s11071-023-08861-5
    86. Saida Beknazarova, Zamira Ishanxadjayeva, Mexriban Jaumitbaeva, D. Bazarov, Media resources in video information systems, 2023, 401, 2267-1242, 03068, 10.1051/e3sconf/202340103068
    87. Michael Herty, Ferdinand Thein, On the relation between approaches for boundary feedback control of hyperbolic systems, 2025, 82, 09473580, 101182, 10.1016/j.ejcon.2025.101182
    88. Iasson Karafyllis, Filippos Vokos, Miroslav Krstic, Feedback stabilisation of tank-liquid system with robustness to surface tension, 2025, 0020-7179, 1, 10.1080/00207179.2025.2462241
    89. Seydou Sore, Yacouba Simpore, Optimal Control of Sediment Deposition in Shallow Waters, 2025, 0143-2087, 10.1002/oca.3269
    90. Irina Kmit, Viktor Tkachenko, 2025, Chapter 20, 978-3-031-77377-8, 343, 10.1007/978-3-031-77378-5_20
    91. Amaury Hayat, Yating Hu, Peipei Shang, Boundary stabilization of star-shaped Saint-Venant networks with combined subcritical and supercritical channels, 2025, 203, 01676911, 106135, 10.1016/j.sysconle.2025.106135
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1678) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog