Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/GeneralPunctuation.js
Review

A systematic review of image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture: Challenges and benefits

  • Percutaneous puncture is a common medical procedure that involves accessing an internal organ or tissue through the skin. Image guidance and surgical robots have been increasingly used to assist with percutaneous procedures, but the challenges and benefits of these technologies have not been thoroughly explored. The aims of this systematic review are to furnish an overview of the challenges and benefits of image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture and to provide evidence on this approach. We searched several electronic databases for studies on image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous punctures published between January 2018 and December 2022. The final analysis refers to 53 studies in total. The results of this review suggest that image guidance and surgical robots can improve the accuracy and precision of percutaneous procedures, decrease radiation exposure to patients and medical personnel and lower the risk of complications. However, there are many challenges related to the use of these technologies, such as the integration of the robot and operating room, immature robotic perception, and deviation of needle insertion. In conclusion, image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture offers many potential benefits, but further research is needed to fully understand the challenges and optimize the utilization of these technologies in clinical practice.

    Citation: Kai Cheng, Lixia Li, Yanmin Du, Jiangtao Wang, Zhenghua Chen, Jian Liu, Xiangsheng Zhang, Lin Dong, Yuanyuan Shen, Zhenlin Yang. A systematic review of image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture: Challenges and benefits[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 8375-8399. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023367

    Related Papers:

    [1] Long Wen, Yan Dong, Liang Gao . A new ensemble residual convolutional neural network for remaining useful life estimation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(2): 862-880. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019040
    [2] Long Wen, Liang Gao, Yan Dong, Zheng Zhu . A negative correlation ensemble transfer learning method for fault diagnosis based on convolutional neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3311-3330. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019165
    [3] Chunmei He, Hongyu Kang, Tong Yao, Xiaorui Li . An effective classifier based on convolutional neural network and regularized extreme learning machine. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 8309-8321. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019420
    [4] Jia-Gang Qiu, Yi Li, Hao-Qi Liu, Shuang Lin, Lei Pang, Gang Sun, Ying-Zhe Song . Research on motion recognition based on multi-dimensional sensing data and deep learning algorithms. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14578-14595. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023652
    [5] Wang Cai, Jianzhuang Wang, Longchao Cao, Gaoyang Mi, Leshi Shu, Qi Zhou, Ping Jiang . Predicting the weld width from high-speed successive images of the weld zone using different machine learning algorithms during laser welding. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5595-5612. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019278
    [6] Shuai Cao, Biao Song . Visual attentional-driven deep learning method for flower recognition. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 1981-1991. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021103
    [7] Yufeng Li, Chengcheng Liu, Weiping Zhao, Yufeng Huang . Multi-spectral remote sensing images feature coverage classification based on improved convolutional neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4443-4456. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020245
    [8] Giuseppe Ciaburro . Machine fault detection methods based on machine learning algorithms: A review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 11453-11490. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022534
    [9] Yu Lei, Zhi Su, Xiaotong He, Chao Cheng . Immersive virtual reality application for intelligent manufacturing: Applications and art design. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 4353-4387. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023202
    [10] Zijian Wang, Yaqin Zhu, Haibo Shi, Yanting Zhang, Cairong Yan . A 3D multiscale view convolutional neural network with attention for mental disease diagnosis on MRI images. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6978-6994. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021347
  • Percutaneous puncture is a common medical procedure that involves accessing an internal organ or tissue through the skin. Image guidance and surgical robots have been increasingly used to assist with percutaneous procedures, but the challenges and benefits of these technologies have not been thoroughly explored. The aims of this systematic review are to furnish an overview of the challenges and benefits of image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture and to provide evidence on this approach. We searched several electronic databases for studies on image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous punctures published between January 2018 and December 2022. The final analysis refers to 53 studies in total. The results of this review suggest that image guidance and surgical robots can improve the accuracy and precision of percutaneous procedures, decrease radiation exposure to patients and medical personnel and lower the risk of complications. However, there are many challenges related to the use of these technologies, such as the integration of the robot and operating room, immature robotic perception, and deviation of needle insertion. In conclusion, image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture offers many potential benefits, but further research is needed to fully understand the challenges and optimize the utilization of these technologies in clinical practice.



    Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations are composed of Euler (or Navier-Stokes) equations and Maxwells equations, which are mainly used to describe the complex interactions between conductive fluids and electromagnetic fields. They are widely applied in plasma [1], astrophysical research [2,3], controlled thermonuclear fusion [4], and new industrial technologies [5]. The study of exact solutions for magnetohydrodynamics systems can provide possible ideas for finding the global smooth solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation. However, compared with the Navier-Stokes equation, MHD equations contain additional nonlinear and coupling terms for velocity and magnetic fields, which makes their research more challenging.

    The qualitative stability analysis of MHD systems has been widely studied. Qin et al. [6] investigated the exponential stability of the global solution of (1 + 1)-dimensional compressible MHD equations. Suo et al. [7] studied the well-posedness of (2 + 1)-dimensional incompressible MHD equations with horizontal dissipation. Wang et al. [8] proved the stability of the global weak solution of (3 + 1)-dimensional incompressible MHD equations when the norms of the initial data are bounded by the minimal value of the viscosity coefficients. Li et al. [9] studied the convergence stability of local solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional compressible viscous MHD equations. Xu et al. [10] studied the stability of local solutions to (3 + 1)-dimensional barotropic compressible MHD equations with vacuum. In the quantitative analysis, the complex nonlinearity and strong coupling of MHD equations make it difficult to seek the analytical solutions by some classical methods, such as the bilinear method [11], Darboux transformation method [12,13], Backlund transformation method [14], Lie symmetry analysis method [15,16,17], non-local symmetry analysis method [18,19], and Riemann-Hilbert method [20,21]. The quantitative calculations on MHD equations mainly focused on constructing specific forms of exact solutions or numerical solutions. Nevertheless, analytical solutions can provide an accurate mathematical description and theoretical basis for analysis and regulation of MHD systems, which has aroused widespread research interest. Donato et al. [22] studied exact solutions of (1 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations by Lie group analysis. Dorodnitsyn et al. [23] explored symmetries of plane one-dimensional MHD flows in the mass Lagrangian coordinates. Liu et al. [24] derived exact solutions of (2 + 1)-dimensional incompressible and barotropic MHD equations by Lie symmetry analysis. Xia et al. [25] studied group invariant solutions of (2 + 1)-dimensional incompressible ideal MHD equations by Lie symmetry method. Picard et al. [26] obtained some exact solutions of (3 + 1)-dimensional ideal MHD equations based on Lie group theory. Considering the physical significance of MHD equations and importance of analytical calculation, more diverse forms of exact solutions of MHD equations deserve to be further studied.

    As powerful tools for solving nonlinear equations, symmetry analysis [15,16,17,18,19] and the simplest equation methods [27] demonstrate special advantages in handling nonlinear terms in dynamical systems. For instance, Zhao et al. [15] studied the Heisenberg equation from the perspective of statistical physics by Lie symmetry analysis. Ali et al. [16] obtained new exact invariant solutions of (3 + 1)-dimensional variable coefficients Kudryashov-Sinelshchikov equation by Lie symmetry analysis. Adeyemo et al. [17] explored closed-form solutions of integrable (2 + 1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation by Lie symmetry reductions. Ren et al. [18] derived interaction solutions of modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation by nonlocal symmetry reductions. Vitanov et al. [27] investigated the role of the simplest equations in obtaining exact and approximate solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. The Lie symmetry analysis method simplifies problems by finding the invariance of differential equations, and transforms the original equations into a more easily solvable form through symmetry transformations. This method provides powerful tools for solving nonlinear problems with complex structures. The generalized Riccati equation is an important auxiliary equation with rich special solutions. This makes the generalized Riccati equation mapping method an effective direct method for constructing the solitary wave solutions, the periodic solutions and the rational solutions for MHD equations. In this paper, using the Lie symmetry analysis method and generalized Riccati equation expansion method, we obtain new solutions with various forms of MHD equations. The major contributions of this article are listed as follows:

    (1) Based on symmetry analysis and generalized Riccati equation expansion methods, the complex nonlinear and strongly coupled terms in MHD equations are technically handled. Different forms of new solutions are derived, which can describe various wave behaviors for MHD flows. Some of the solutions can be reduced to exact solutions for Euler or Navier-Stokes equations when magnetic fields vanish, which may provide references for the research on global solutions for Navier-Stokes equations.

    (2) The stability of solutions for MHD equations is analyzed from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives based on the obtained solutions.

    (3) The new solutions, wave behaviors, and stability analysis provide accurate mathematical descriptions and theoretical basis for numerical analysis and regulation of MHD systems.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: The transformations for MHD equations are given in Section 2. In Section 3, the exact solutions of inviscid and viscous (2 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations are obtained by the Lie symmetry analysis method and generalized Riccati equation expansion method. In Section 4, inviscid and viscous (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations are further studied. In Section 5, the stability of MHD equations is studied from qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 6.

    The flow of conducting fluid in a magnetic field is governed by the following incompressible MHD equations [28], which are a combination of Euler (or Navier-Stokes) equations of fluid dynamics and Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism. The set of equations express the conservation of mass, momentum and the interaction of the flow with the magnetic field. Consider (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional incompressible MHD equations [28]

    {UtνΔU+(U)U+p+κB×curlB=0,Bt+ηcurlcurlBcurl(U×B)+r=0,divU=0, divB=0, (2.1)

    where U is fluid velocity, p is hydrodynamic pressure, B is magnetic induction, r is magnetic pressure. The physical parameters ν, μ and σ represent kinematic viscosity, magnetic permeability and electric conductivity, respectively. η=1μσ, κ=1μ. Substituting equations

    B×curlB=12(|B|2)(B)B, curlcurlB=ΔB,curl(U×B)=(B)U(U)B,

    into (2.1), the incompressible MHD equations (2.1) can be rewritten as

    {UtνΔU+(U)U+p+κ[12(|B|2)(B)B]=0,BtηΔB(B)U+(U)B+r=0,divU=0, divB=0. (2.2)

    Denote x=(x,y), U=(u1(t,x),u2(t,x)), B=(b1(t,x),b2(t,x)) in (2.2). (2 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations can be given as

    {u1tν(u1xx+u1yy)+(u1u1x+u2u1y)+κ(b2b2xb2b1y)+px=0,u2tν(u2xx+u2yy)+(u1u2x+u2u2y)+κ(b1b1yb1b2x)+py=0,b1tη(b1xx+b1yy)(b1u1x+b2u1y)+(u1b1x+u2b1y)+rx=0,b2tη(b2xx+b2yy)(b1u2x+b2u2y)+(u1b2x+u2b2y)+ry=0,u1x+u2y=0, b1x+b2y=0. (3.1)

    The vector field of system (3.1) can be expressed as

    V_=ζ1t+ζ2x+ζ3y+ϕ1u1+ϕ2u2+φ1b1+φ2b2+ψ1p+ψ2r, (3.2)

    where ζi (i=1,2,3), ϕj, φj, ψj (j=1,2) are undetermined coefficients about t, x, U, B, p, r. It follows from second-order prolongation pr(2)V_(Δ)|Δ=0=0 that

    ϕt1ν(ϕxx1+ϕyy1)+ϕ1u1x+u1ϕx1+ϕ2u1y+u2ϕy1+κ(φ2b2x+b2φx2φ2b1yb2φy1)+ψx1=0,ϕt2ν(ϕxx2+ϕyy2)+ϕ1u2x+u1ϕx2+ϕ2u2y+u2ϕy2+κ(φ1b1y+b1φy1φ1b2xb1φx2)+ψy1=0,φt1η(φxx1+φyy1)φ1u1xb1ϕx1φ2u1yb2ϕy1+ϕ1b1x+u1φx1+ϕ2b1y+u2φy1+ψx2=0,φt2η(φxx2+φyy2)φ1u2xb1ϕx2φ2u2yb2ϕy2+ϕ1b2x+u1φx2+ϕ2b2y+u2φy2+ψy2=0,ϕx1+ϕy2=0, φx1+φy2=0. (3.3)

    Choosing ν=η=0 and κ=1 in Eq (3.1), the inviscid MHD equations can be obtained as

    {u1t+(u1u1x+u2u1y)+(b2b2xb2b1y)+px=0,u2t+(u1u2x+u2u2y)+(b1b1yb1b2x)+py=0,b1t(b1u1x+b2u1y)+(u1b1x+u2b1y)+rx=0,b2t(b1u2x+b2u2y)+(u1b2x+u2b2y)+ry=0,u1x+u2y=0, b1x+b2y=0. (3.4)

    Solving (3.3) with ν=η=0 and κ=1, the coefficient functions of vector field V_ can be obtained as

    ζ1=2C1t+C2, ζ2=C0xC12y+f1(t)+C3, ζ3=C12x+C0y+f2(t)+C4,ϕ1=(C02C1)u1C12u2+f1(t), ϕ2=C12u1+(C02C1)u2+f2(t),φ1=(C02C1)b1C12b2, φ2=C12b1+(C02C1)b2,ψ1=2(C02C1)pxf1(t)yf2(t)+α(t), ψ2=2(C02C1)r+β(t), (3.5)

    where C0,C1,C2,C3,C4 and C12 are arbitrary constants. f1(t),f2(t),α(t) and β(t) are arbitrary functions related to t only. When C2=1, C3=ˉv1, C4=ˉv2, C0=C1=C12=f1(t)=f2(t)=0,

    V_=(C2t+C3x+C4y)+α(t)p+β(t)r=t+ˉv1x+ˉv2y+α(t)p+β(t)r. (3.6)

    The characteristic equation is

    dt1=dxˉv1=dyˉv2=du10=du20=db10=db20=dpα(t)=drβ(t). (3.7)

    It follows from (3.7) that corresponding invariants are

    ˉζ1=xˉv1t, ˉζ2=yˉv2t, F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=u1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=u2, G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=b1,G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=b2, Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=p+α(t)dt, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=r+β(t)dt. (3.8)

    Substituting (3.8) into (3.4), reduced equations can be obtained as

    {ˉv1F1ˉζ1+ˉv2F1ˉζ2+F1F1ˉζ1+F2F1ˉζ2+G2G2ˉζ1G2G1ˉζ2Qˉζ1=0,ˉv1F2ˉζ1+ˉv2F2ˉζ2+F1F2ˉζ1+F2F2ˉζ2+G1G1ˉζ2G1G2ˉζ1Qˉζ2=0,ˉv1G1ˉζ1+ˉv2G1ˉζ2G1F1ˉζ1G2F1ˉζ2+F1G1ˉζ1+F2G1ˉζ2Rˉζ1=0,ˉv1G2ˉζ1+ˉv2G2ˉζ2G1F2ˉζ1G2F2ˉζ2+F1G2ˉζ1+F2G2ˉζ2Rˉζ2=0,F1ˉζ1+F2ˉζ2=0, G1ˉζ1+G2ˉζ2=0. (3.9)

    It can be obtained that (3.10)–(3.12) are three kinds of solutions for (3.9).

    Case 1. Sin/cos-type solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=cos2(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=cos2(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv2,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=sin(ˉζ1ˉζ2)cos(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv1, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=sin(ˉζ1ˉζ2)cos(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv1,Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=ˉv1sin(2ˉζ1+2ˉζ2)cos(4ˉζ1+4ˉζ2)8+m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=n, (3.10)

    where m and n are arbitrary constants.

    Case 2. Sech-type solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=sech2(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=sech2(ˉζ1ˉζ2)ˉv2,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c1, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c1, Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=n, (3.11)

    where c1 is arbitrary constant.

    Case 3. Rational solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c2ˉζ2ˉζ21+ˉζ22, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c2ˉζ1ˉζ21+ˉζ22,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c3ˉζ2ˉζ21+ˉζ22, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c3ˉζ1ˉζ21+ˉζ22,Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c2(2ˉζ1ˉv22ˉζ2ˉv1+c2)2(ˉζ21+ˉζ22)+m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=c3(ˉζ1ˉv2ˉζ2ˉv1)ˉζ21+ˉζ22+n, (3.12)

    where c2 and c3 are arbitrary constants. Substituting (3.8) into (3.10)–(3.12), respectively, we obtain that (3.13)–(3.15) are three kinds of solutions for (2+1)-dimensional MHD equations (3.4).

    Case 1. Sin/cos-type solution.

    u1=cos2[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv1, u2=cos2[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv2,b1=sin[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]cos[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv1,b2=sin[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]cos[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv1, r=n+β(t)dt,p=ˉv1sin[(2ˉv12ˉv2)t2x+2y]+cos[(4ˉv14ˉv2)t4x+4y]8m+α(t)dt. (3.13)

    Setting ˉv1=3,ˉv2=4 and x=6 for u1 in (3.13), we obtain Figure 1 of periodic solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 1.  (a) The evolution of periodic solution via (3.13), (b) u1(t = 1, 3, 5).

    From solution (3.13) and Figure 1, it can be seen that the solution exhibits periodic characteristics over time and space. The physical significance of the solution mainly includes the following points:

    (ⅰ) Periodic solution can be used to analyze the stability of MHD system. If the MHD system can reach periodic solutions, it usually means that the system can achieve stability under certain conditions.

    (ⅱ) Periodic solution can describe oscillatory phenomena in the MHD system, such as periodic changes in magnetic fields, periodic fluctuations in fluid velocity, etc.

    (ⅲ) In industry, such as magnetohydrodynamic power generation, periodic flow can improve power generation efficiency. By optimizing the periodic solution, more efficient power generation equipment can be designed.

    Case 2. Sech-type solution.

    u1=sech2[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv1, u2=sech2[xy(ˉv1ˉv2)t]+ˉv2,b1=c1, b2=c1, p=m+α(t)dt, r=n+β(t)dt. (3.14)

    Setting ˉv1=1 and ˉv2=2 for u1 in (3.14), we obtain Figure 2 of single soliton solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 2.  The evolution of a single soliton solution via (3.14) (t=1, 4, 7, respectively).

    From Figure 2, it can be seen that the velocity is constant in certain domains of space. Moreover, the velocity is induced to a sudden rise until it reaches a maximum value. As a stable wave form, the characteristics of solitons emerge from the collective behavior of nonlinear media. Solitons play an important role in the study of MHD waves due to their unique properties and applications in various physical contexts. The importance of solitons in the main problem mostly includes the following points:

    (ⅰ) As a special wave phenomenon, solitons can form stable wave structures in plasmas. In controlled thermonuclear fusion research, soliton waves can be used to describe some wave phenomena in plasma, which has potential application value for achieving and maintaining the stability of fusion plasma.

    (ⅱ) Solitons can maintain their shape and amplitude is unchanged during propagation. This property is important for understanding and predicting some wave propagations in MHD flow.

    (ⅲ) Solitons can help explain some phenomena in MHD flow, such as the localized structure of magnetic fields and the dynamic behavior of magnetic domain walls.

    Case 3. Rational solution.

    u1=c2(yˉv2t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, u2=c2(xˉv1t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2,b1=c3(yˉv2t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, b2=c3(xˉv1t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2,p=c2[2(xˉv1t)ˉv22(yˉv2t)ˉv1+c2]2[(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2]m+α(t)dt,r=c3[(xˉv1t)ˉv2(yˉv2t)ˉv1](xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2n+β(t)dt. (3.15)

    Setting ˉv1=1,ˉv2=1,c2=1 and x=2 for u1 in (3.15), we obtain lump (c.f. Figure 3 for solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 3.  (a) The evolution of lump solution via (3.15), (b) Overview of u1.

    From Figure 3, it can be seen the flow have the characteristics of spatial and temporal localization. Lump solution corresponds to the emergent phenomenon of energy focusing in a specific region or time point. The amplitude of peak and valley is several times higher than the surrounding background height. The scale transformation of the lump has already been processed in mathematics. Actually, shock wave may be seen and local instability may occur in reality.

    Remark 3.1. (1) If b1=b2=0 and r=0 in (3.14) and (3.15), then (3.14) and (3.15) reduce to exact solutions for (2 + 1)-dimensional Euler equation.

    (2) Since ω=u2xu1y0 in (3.13) and (3.14) and ω=u2xu1y=0 in (3.15), it can be concluded that (3.13) and (3.14) correspond to rotational flow. Additionally, (3.15) corresponds to inrotational flow.

    Without loss of generality, choosing ν=η=κ=1 in Eq (3.1), the viscous MHD equations can be obtained as

    {u1t(u1xx+u1yy)+(u1u1x+u2u1y)+(b2b2xb2b1y)+px=0,u2t(u2xx+u2yy)+(u1u2x+u2u2y)+(b1b1yb1b2x)+py=0,b1t(b1xx+b1yy)(b1u1x+b2u1y)+(u1b1x+u2b1y)+rx=0,b2t(b2xx+b2yy)(b1u2x+b2u2y)+(u1b2x+u2b2y)+ry=0,u1x+u2y=0, b1x+b2y=0. (3.16)

    Solving (3.3) with ν=η=κ=1, the coefficient functions of vector field V_ can be obtained as

    ζ1=2C1t+C2, ζ2=C1xC12y+f1(t)+C3, ζ3=C12x+C1y+f2(t)+C4,ϕ1=C1u1C12u2+f1(t), ϕ2=C12u1C1u2+f2(t),φ1=C1b1C12b2, φ2=C12b1C1b2,ψ1=2C1pxf1(t)yf2(t)+α(t), ψ2=2C1r+β(t). (3.17)

    Case 1. When C1=C2=C3=C4=C12=f1(t)=f2(t)=0, V_=α(t)p+β(t)r.

    The corresponding invariants are

    ˉζ0=t, ˉζ1=x, ˉζ2=y, F1(ˉζ0,ˉζ2)=u1, F2(ˉζ0,ˉζ1)=u2,G1(ˉζ0, ˉζ2)=b1, G2(ˉζ0,ˉζ1)=b2. (3.18)

    Substituting invariants (3.18) into (3.16), and solving the reduced equations,

    u1=g1etcosy,  u2=g2etcosx, b1=g3etcosy, b2=g4etcosx,p=[cos(2y)g23g4+2g34sin2x+4g3(g22g24)sinxsiny]e2t4g4+m(t), r=n(t), (3.19)

    is a sin/cos-type solution for MHD equations (3.16), where g1g4g2g3=0. m(t) and n(t) are arbitrary functions related to t only. Setting g1=1 for u1 in (3.19), we obtain Figure 4 of solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 4.  (a) The evolution of periodic solution via (3.19), (b) u1(t = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8).

    From Figure 4, it can be seen that as time increases, the shape and direction of the velocity remain unchanged, but the amplitude decreases.

    Case 2. When C2=1, Ci=C12=f1(t)=f2(t)=α(t)=β(t)=0 (i=0,1,3,4), V_=t.

    The characteristic equation is

    dt1=dx0=dy0=du10=du20=db10=db20=dp0=dr0. (3.20)

    The corresponding invariants are

    ˉζ1=x, ˉζ2=y, F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=u1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=u2,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=b1, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=b2, Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=p, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2)=r. (3.21)

    Substituting invariants (3.21) into (3.16), and solving the reduced equations,

    u1=sech2(x+iy), u2=isech2(x+iy),b1=sech2(x+iy), b2=isech2(x+iy), p=m, r=n, (3.22)

    is a sech-type solution for MHD equations (3.16). Using symmetry

    V_=tx+ty+u1+u2,

    solution (3.22) can further generate the following invariant solution

    u1=sech2(xεt+i(yεt))+ε, u2=isech2(xεt+i(yεt))+ε,b1=sech2(xεt+i(yεt)), b2=isech2(xεt+i(yεt)), p=m(t), r=n(t), (3.23)

    where ε is arbitrary constant.

    Remark 3.2. (1) The lump solution (3.15) for inviscid MHD equations (3.4) also satisfies the viscous MHD equations (3.16).

    (2) If b1=b2=0 and r=0 in (3.23), then (3.23) reduces to exact solutions for (2 + 1)-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation.

    (3) Since ω=u2xu1y0 in (3.19) and ω=u2xu1y=0 in (3.23), it can be concluded that (3.19) corresponds to rotational flow. Moreover, (3.23) corresponds to inrotational flow.

    As an important method of simplest equation methods, the generalized Riccati equation method [29,30] provides a powerful mathematical tool to deal with the complex nonlinear and strong coupling terms in MHD equations. Using traveling wave transformation,

    ζ=k2x+k3yk1t, (3.24)

    equations (3.1) are transformed into following ordinary differential equations (ODEs) as

    {k1u1ζν(k22u1ζζ+k23u1ζζ)+(k2u1u1ζ+k3u2u1ζ)+κ(k2b2b2ζk3b2b1ζ)+k2pζ=0,k1u2ζν(k22u2ζζ+k23u2ζζ)+(k2u1u2ζ+k3u2u2ζ)+κ(k3b1b1ζk2b1b2ζ)+k3pζ=0,k1b1ζη(k22b1ζζ+k23b1ζζ)(k2b1u1ζ+k3b2u1ζ)+k2u1b1ζ+k3u2b1ζ+k2rζ=0,k1b2ζη(k22b2ζζ+k23b2ζζ)(k2b1u2ζ+k3b2u2ζ)+k2u1b2ζ+k3u2b2ζ+k3rζ=0,k2u1ζ+k3u2ζ=0, k2b1ζ+k3b2ζ=0. (3.25)

    Suppose that the solution of ODEs (3.25) can be expressed as a polynomial of ϕ(ζ) as

    u1=N1i=0aiϕi(ζ), u2=N2i=0miϕi(ζ), b1=N3i=0niϕi(ζ),b2=N4i=0siϕi(ζ), p=N5i=0liϕi(ζ)+l(t), r=N6i=0qiϕi(ζ)+q(t), (3.26)

    where ai,mi,ni,si,li,qi are undetermined constants and aN1,mN2,nN3,sN40. l(t) and q(t) are arbitrary functions related to t only. ϕ(ζ) satisfies the generalized Riccati equation

    ϕ(ζ)=ξ0+ξ1ϕ(ζ)+ξ2ϕ2(ζ), (3.27)

    where ξ0,ξ1 and ξ2 are arbitrary constants with ξ20. We choose N1=N2=N3=N4=N5=N6=2 with can balance the highest order of the derivative and nonlinear terms in ODEs.

    When ν=η=0 and κ=1 in ODEs (3.25), substituting (3.26) and (3.27) into (3.25), collecting the coefficients of ϕi(ζ) and setting them to be zeros, we obtain

    a0=a0,a1=a1,a2=a2,k1=k1,k2=k2,k3=k3,l1=l1,l2=n21(k22+k23)2k23,m0=a0k2+k1k3,m1=a1k2k3,m2=k2a2k3,n0=k23l1n1(k22+k23),n1=n1,n2=0,q1=0,q2=0,s0=k2k3l1n1(k22+k23),s1=k2n1k3,s2=0. (3.28)

    Substituting (3.28) and the general solutions of (3.27) (c.f. [29]) into (3.26), it can be obtained following four kinds of solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional inviscid MHD equations.

    Case 1. When ξ214ξ2ξ0>0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the tanh-type solution can be obtained as follows.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a2ξ1a1ξ22ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+a2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),u2=4ξ22(a0k2+k1)+2a1k2ξ1ξ2k2a2ξ214k3ξ22k2a2(ξ124ξ2ξ0)4k3ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+k2(a1ξ2a2ξ1)2k3ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),b1=2k23l1ξ2+n21(k22+k23)ξ12n1(k22+k23)ξ2n1ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),b2=2k2k23l1ξ2+k2n21(k22+k23)ξ12k3n1(k22+k23)ξ2+k2n1ξ214ξ2ξ02k3ξ2tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (3.29)

    where ζ=k2x+k3yk1t. Setting a0=1,a1=7,a2=1,k1=3,k2=1,k3=1,ξ0=1,ξ1=3 and ξ2=1 for u1 in (3.29), we obtain Figure 5 of kink solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 5.  u1(t=2, 4, 6, respectively).

    In particular, when ξ0=0 and ξ1ξ20, the sinh-cosh-type solution can be obtained as follows

    u1=a0a1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+a2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u2=a0k2+k1k3+a1k2ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]k3ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]k2a2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2k3ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,b1=k23l1n1(k22+k23)n1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C],b2=k2k3l1n1(k22+k23)+k2n1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]k3ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C], (3.30)

    where C is arbitrary constant. Setting a0=4,a1=10,a2=8,k1=4,k2=16,k3=2,ξ0=0, ξ1=1,ξ2=1,C=1 and x=1 for u1 in (3.30), we obtain Figure 6 of anti-kink-like solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 6.  (a) u1, (b) u1(t = 1, 2, 3).

    The kink and kink-like solutions can be understood as a macroscopic stable structure generated from the field dynamics at the microscale. They manifest as a rapid change or discontinuity in some field at the macro level.

    Case 2. When ξ214ξ2ξ0<0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the tan-type solution can be obtained as follows.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a1ξ2a2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+a2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),u2=4ξ22(a0k2+k1)+2a1k2ξ1ξ2k2a2ξ214k3ξ22k2a2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4k3ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+k2(a2ξ1a1ξ2)2k3ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),b1=2k23l1ξ2+n21(k22+k23)ξ12n1(k22+k23)ξ2+n14ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),b2=2k2k23l1ξ2+k2n21(k22+k23)ξ12k3n1(k22+k23)ξ2k2n14ξ2ξ0ξ212k3ξ2tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ).

    Case 3. When ξ1=ξ0=0 and ξ20, the rational solution can be obtained as follows

    u1=a0a1ξ2ζ+C+a2(ξ2ζ+C)2, u2=a0k2+k1k3+a1k2k3(ξ2ζ+C)a2k2k3(ξ2ζ+C)2,b1=k23l1n1(k22+k23)n1ξ2ζ+C, b2=k2k3l1n1(k22+k23)+k2n1k3(ξ2ζ+C).  (3.31)

    When ν=η=κ=1 in ODEs (3.25), Substituting (3.26) and (3.27) into (3.25), we obtain

    a0=a0,a1=a1,a2=a2,k1=k1,k2=k2,k3=ik2,l1=((a0+im0)k2+k1)a1k2,l2=((a0+im0)k2+k1)a2k2,m0=m0,m1=ia1,m2=ia2,n0=n0,n1=n1,s2=0,n2=0,q1=((a0+im0)n1(is0n0)a1)k2+n1k1k2,q2=a2(is0n0),s0=s0, s1=in1. (3.32)

    Substituting (3.32) and general solutions of (3.27) (c.f. [29]) into (3.26), it can be obtained that (3.33)–(3.40) are four kinds of solutions for (2 + 1)-dimensional viscous MHD equations.

    Case 1. When ξ214ξ2ξ0>0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tanh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a2ξ1a1ξ22ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+a2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),u2=m0+i(2a1ξ1ξ2a2ξ21)4ξ22+i(a1ξ2a2ξ1)2ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)ia2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),b1=2n0ξ2n1ξ12ξ2n1ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),b2=s0+in1ξ12ξ2+in1ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ). (3.33)

    In particular, when ξ0=0 and ξ1ξ20, the following sinh-cosh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+a2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u2=m0+ia1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]ia2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,b1=n0n1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C], b2=s0+in1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]. (3.34)

    Setting a1=2,a2=2,m0=1,k1=1,k2=1,ξ0=0,ξ1=2,ξ2=14,C=1 and x=1 for u2 in (3.34), we obtain breather (c.f. Figure 7) for solution u2 as follows.

    Figure 7.  (a) The evolution of Akhmediev breaher solution via |u2|, (b) Overview of |u2|, (c) |u2|(t=1,2,3).

    From Figure 7, the breather appears to be localized in the t-axis direction, and periodic in the y-axis direction. It corresponds to a type of nonlinear wave where energy is concentrated in a local oscillation manner. The breather solutions can serve as a carrier of energy transfer during the propagation process, and the characteristics of this energy transfer are related to the macroscopic behavior in emergent phenomena.

    Case 2. When ξ214ξ2ξ0<0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tan-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a1ξ2a2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+a2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (3.35)
    u2=m0+i(2a1ξ1ξ2a2ξ21)4ξ22+i(a2ξ1a1ξ2)2ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)ia2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (3.36)
    b1=2n0ξ2n1ξ12ξ2+n14ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (3.37)
    b2=s0+in1ξ12ξ2in14ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ). (3.38)

    Setting a1=12,a2=2,m0=1,k1=6,k2=1,ξ0=2,ξ1=2,ξ2=1 and x=1 in (3.36), we obtain Figure 8 for breather solution u2 as follows.

    Figure 8.  (a) The evolution of Kuznetsov-Ma breaher solution via |u2|, (b) Overview of |u2|, (c) |u2|(y=1,1.5,2).

    From Figure 8, the breather appears to be localized in the y-axis direction, and periodic in the t-axis direction, which corresponds to a nonlinear local wave that oscillates periodically in time.

    Case 3. When ξ1=ξ0=0 and ξ20, the following rational solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ2ζ+C+a2(ξ2ζ+C)2, u2=m0+ia1ξ2ζ+Cia2(ξ2ζ+C)2, (3.39)
    b1=n0n1ξ2ζ+C, b2=s0+in1ξ2ζ+C. (3.40)

    Denote x=(x,y,z), U=(u1(t,x),u2(t,x),u3(t,x)), B=(b1(t,x),b2(t,x),b3(t,x)) in (2.2), the component form of the (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations can be obtained as

    {u1tν(u1xx+u1yy+u1zz)+(u1u1x+u2u1y+u3u1z)+κ(b2b2x+b3b3xb2b1yb3b1z)+px=0,u2tν(u2xx+u2yy+u2zz)+(u1u2x+u2u2y+u3u2z)+κ(b1b1y+b3b3yb1b2xb3b2z+py=0,u3tν(u3xx+u3yy+u3zz)+(u1u3x+u2u3y+u3u3z)+κ(b1b1z+b2b2zb1b3xb2b3y)+pz=0,b1tη(b1xx+b1yy+b1zz)(b1u1x+b2u1y+b3u1z)+(u1b1x+u2b1y+u3b1z)+rx=0,b2tη(b2xx+b2yy+b2zz)(b1u2x+b2u2y+b3u2z)+(u1b2x+u2b2y+u3b2z)+ry=0,b3tη(b3xx+b3yy+b3zz)(b1u3x+b2u3y+b3u3z)+(u1b3x+u2b3y+u3b3z)+rz=0,u1x+u2y+u3z=0, b1x+b2y+b3z=0. (4.1)

    The vector field of the system (4.1) can be expressed as

    V_=ζ1t+ζ2x+ζ3y+ζ4z+ϕ1u1+ϕ2u2+ϕ3u3+φ1b1+φ2b2+φ3b3+ψ1p+ψ2r, (4.2)

    where ζi (i=1,2,3,4), ϕj, φj (j=1,2,3) and ψk (k=1,2) are undetermined coefficients about t, x, U, B, p and r. It follows from the second-order prolongation pr(2)V_(Δ)|Δ=0=0 that

    ϕt1ν(ϕxx1+ϕyy1+ϕzz1)+ϕ1u1x+u1ϕx1+ϕ2u1y+u2ϕy1+ϕ3u1z+u3ϕz1+κ(φ2b2x+b2φx2+φ3b3x+b3φx3φ2b1yb2φy1φ3b1zb3φz1)+ψx1=0, (4.3)
    ϕt2ν(ϕxx2+ϕyy2+ϕzz2)+ϕ1u2x+u1ϕx2+ϕ2u2y+u2ϕy2+ϕ3u2z+u3ϕz2+κ(φ1b1y+b1φy1+φ3b3y+b3φy3φ1b2xb1φx2φ3b2zb3φz2)+ψy1=0, (4.4)
    ϕt3ν(ϕxx3+ϕyy3+ϕzz3)+ϕ1u3x+u1ϕx3+ϕ2u3y+u2ϕy3+ϕ3u3z+u3ϕz3+κ(φ1b1z+b1φz1+φ2b2z+b2φz2φ1b3xb1φx3φ2b3yb2φy3)+ψz1=0, (4.5)
    φt1η(φxx1+φyy1+φzz1)φ1u1xb1ϕx1φ2u1yb2ϕy1φ3u1zb3ϕz1+ϕ1b1x+u1φx1+ϕ2b1y+u2φy1+ϕ3b1z+u3φz1+ψx2=0, (4.6)
    φt2η(φxx2+φyy2+φzz2)φ1u2xb1ϕx2φ2u2yb2ϕy2φ3u2zb3ϕz2+ϕ1b2x+u1φx2+ϕ2b2y+u2φy2+ϕ3b2z+u3φz2+ψy2=0, (4.7)
    φt3η(φxx3+φyy3+φzz3)φ1u3xb1ϕx3φ2u3yb2ϕy3φ3u3zb3ϕz3+ϕ1b3x+u1φx3+ϕ2b3y+u2φy3+ϕ3b3z+u3φz3+ψz2=0, (4.8)
    ϕx1+ϕy2+ϕz3=0, φx1+φy2+φz3=0. (4.9)

    Choosing ν=η=0 and κ=1 in equations (4.1), the inviscid MHD equations can be obtained as

    {u1t+(u1u1x+u2u1y+u3u1z)+(b2b2x+b3b3xb2b1yb3b1z)+px=0,u2t+(u1u2x+u2u2y+u3u2z)+(b1b1y+b3b3yb1b2xb3b2z)+py=0,u3t+(u1u3x+u2u3y+u3u3z)+(b1b1z+b2b2zb1b3xb2b3y)+pz=0,b1t(b1u1x+b2u1y+b3u1z)+(u1b1x+u2b1y+u3b1z)+rx=0,b2t(b1u2x+b2u2y+b3u2z)+(u1b2x+u2b2y+u3b2z)+ry=0,b3t(b1u3x+b2u3y+b3u3z)+(u1b3x+u2b3y+u3b3z)+rz=0,u1x+u2y+u3z=0, b1x+b2y+b3z=0. (4.10)

    Solving (4.3)–(4.9) with ν=η=0 and κ=1, the coefficient functions of vector field V_ can be obtained as

    ζ1=2C1t+C2, ζ2=C0xC12yC13z+f1(t)+C3,ζ3=C12x+C0yC23z+f2(t)+C4, ζ4=C13x+C23y+C0z+f3(t)+C5,ϕ1=(C02C1)u1C12u2C13u3+f1(t), ϕ2=C12u1+(C02C1)u2C23u3+f2(t),ϕ3=C13u1+C23u2+(C02C1)u3+f3(t), φ1=(C02C1)b1C12b2C13b3,φ2=C12b1+(C02C1)b2C23b3, φ3=C13b1+C23b2+(C02C1)b3,ψ1=2(C02C1)pxf1(t)yf2(t)zf3(t)+α(t), ψ2=2(C02C1)r+β(t).

    When C2=1, C3=ˉv1, C4=ˉv2, C5=ˉv3, C0=C1=C12=C13=C23=0, f1(t)=f2(t)=0,

    V_=(C2t+C3x+C4y+C5z)+α(t)p+β(t)r=t+ˉv1x+ˉv2y+ˉv3z+α(t)p+β(t)r. (4.11)

    The characteristic equation is

    dt1=dxˉv1=dyˉv2=dzˉv3=du10=du20=du30=db10=db20=db30=dpα(t)=drβ(t). (4.12)

    It follows from (4.12) that corresponding invariants are

    ˉζ1=xˉv1t, ˉζ2=yˉv2t, ˉζ3=zˉv3t, F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u2,F3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u3, G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b1, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b2, G3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b3,Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=p+α(t)dt, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=r+β(t)dt. (4.13)

    Substituting (4.13) into (4.10), reduced equations can be obtained as

    {ˉv1F1ˉζ1+ˉv2F1ˉζ2+ˉv3F1ˉζ3+F1F1ˉζ1+F2F1ˉζ2+F3F1ˉζ3+G2G2ˉζ1+G3G3ˉζ1G2G1ˉζ2G3G1ˉζ3Qˉζ1=0,ˉv1F2ˉζ1+ˉv2F2ˉζ2+ˉv3F2ˉζ3+F1F2ˉζ1+F2F2ˉζ2+F3F2ˉζ3+G1G1ˉζ2+G3G3ˉζ2G1G2ˉζ1G3G2ˉζ3Qˉζ2=0,ˉv1F3ˉζ1+ˉv2F3ˉζ2+ˉv3F3ˉζ3+F1F3ˉζ1+F2F3ˉζ2+F3F3ˉζ3+G1G1ˉζ3+G2G2ˉζ3G1G3ˉζ1G2G3ˉζ2Qˉζ3=0,ˉv1G1ˉζ1+ˉv2G1ˉζ2+ˉv3G1ˉζ3G1F1ˉζ1G2F1ˉζ2G3F1ˉζ3+F1G1ˉζ1+F2G1ˉζ2+F3G1ˉζ3Rˉζ1=0,ˉv1G2ˉζ1+ˉv2G2ˉζ2+ˉv3G2ˉζ3G1F2ˉζ1G2F2ˉζ2G3F2ˉζ3+F1G2ˉζ1+F2G2ˉζ2+F3G2ˉζ3Rˉζ2=0,ˉv1G3ˉζ1+ˉv2G3ˉζ2+ˉv3G3ˉζ3G1F3ˉζ1G2F3ˉζ2G3F3ˉζ3+F1G3ˉζ1+F2G3ˉζ2+F3G3ˉζ3Rˉζ3=0,F1ˉζ1+F2ˉζ2+F3ˉζ3=0, G1ˉζ1+G2ˉζ2+G3ˉζ3=0. (4.14)

    It can be obtained that (4.15)–(4.17) are three kinds of solutions for (4.14).

    Case 1. Sin-cos-type solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=cos2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv1,F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=cos2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv2,F3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=cos2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv3,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sin(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)cos(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv1,G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sin(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)cos(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv1,G3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sin(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)cos(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv1,Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=3ˉv1sin(4ˉζ1+2ˉζ2+2ˉζ3)23cos(8ˉζ1+4ˉζ2+4ˉζ3)16+m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=n, (4.15)

    where m and n are arbitrary constants.

    Case 2. Sech-type solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sech2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sech2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv2,F3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=sech2(2ˉζ1ˉζ2ˉζ3)ˉv3, G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=12(c1+c2),G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c1, G3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c2, Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=n, (4.16)

    where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants.

    Case 3. Rational solution.

    {F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c3ˉζ2ˉζ21+ˉζ22, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c3ˉζ1ˉζ21+ˉζ22, F3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c5,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c4ˉζ2ˉζ21+ˉζ22, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c4ˉζ1ˉζ21+ˉζ22, G3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c6,Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c3(2ˉζ1ˉv22ˉζ2ˉv1+c3)2(ˉζ21+ˉζ22)+m, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=c4(ˉζ1ˉv2ˉζ2ˉv1)ˉζ21+ˉζ22+n, (4.17)

    where c3,c4,c5 and c6 are arbitrary constants. Substituting (4.13) into (4.15)–(4.17), respectively, we obtain that (4.18)–(4.20) are three kinds of solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations (4.10).

    Case 1. Sin-cos-type solution.

    u1=cos2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv1,u2=cos2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv2,u3=cos2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv3,b1=sin[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]cos[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv1,b2=sin[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]cos[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv1,b3=sin[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]cos[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv1,p=3ˉv1sin[(4ˉv12ˉv22ˉv3)t4x+2y+2z]2+3cos[(8ˉv14ˉv24ˉv3)t8x+4y+4z]16m+α(t)dt,r=n+β(t)dt. (4.18)

    Case 2. Sech-type solution.

    u1=sech2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv1,u2=sech2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv2,u3=sech2[2xyz(2ˉv1ˉv2ˉv3)t]+ˉv3,b1=12(c1+c2), b2=c1, b3=c2, p=m+α(t)dt, r=n+β(t)dt. (4.19)

    Setting ˉv1=2,ˉv2=4,ˉv3=1,y=2 and x=2 for u1 in (4.19), we obtain Figure 9 of solution u1 as follows.

    Figure 9.  (a) The evolution of single soliton solution u1, (b) u1(z = 1, 2, 3).

    Case 3. Rational solution.

    u1=c3(yˉv2t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, u2=c3(xˉv1t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, u3=c5,b1=c4(yˉv2t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, b2=c4(xˉv1t)(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2, b3=c6,p=c3[2(xˉv1t)ˉv22(yˉv2t)ˉv1+c3]2[(xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2]m+α(t)dt,r=c4[(xˉv1t)ˉv2(yˉv2t)ˉv1](xˉv1t)2+(yˉv2t)2n+β(t)dt. (4.20)

    Remark 4.1. (1) If b1=b2=b3=0 and r=0 in (4.19) and (4.20), then (4.19) and (4.20) reduce to exact solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional Euler equation.

    (2) Since ω=×U0 in (4.18) and (4.19) and ω=×U=0 in (4.20), it can be concluded that (4.18) and (4.19) correspond to rotational flow. Additionally, (4.20) corresponds to inrotational flow.

    Without loss of generality, choosing ν=η=κ=1 in Eq (4.1), the viscous MHD equations can be obtained as

    {u1t(u1xx+u1yy+u1zz)+(u1u1x+u2u1y+u3u1z)+(b2b2x+b3b3xb2b1yb3b1z)+px=0,u2t(u2xx+u2yy+u2zz)+(u1u2x+u2u2y+u3u2z)+(b1b1y+b3b3yb1b2xb3b2z)+py=0,u3t(u3xx+u3yy+u3zz)+(u1u3x+u2u3y+u3u3z)+(b1b1z+b2b2zb1b3xb2b3y)+pz=0,b1t(b1xx+b1yy+b1zz)(b1u1x+b2u1y+b3u1z)+(u1b1x+u2b1y+u3b1z)+rx=0,b2t(b2xx+b2yy+b2zz)(b1u2x+b2u2y+b3u2z)+(u1b2x+u2b2y+u3b2z)+ry=0,b3t(b3xx+b3yy+b3zz)(b1u3x+b2u3y+b3u3z)+(u1b3x+u2b3y+u3b3z)+rz=0,u1x+u2y+u3z=0, b1x+b2y+b3z=0. (4.21)

    Solving (4.3)–(4.9) with ν=η=κ=1, the coefficient functions of vector field V_ can be obtained as

    ζ1=2C1t+C2, ζ2=C1xC12yC13z+f1(t)+C3,ζ3=C12x+C1yC23z+f2(t)+C4, ζ4=C13x+C23y+C1z+f3(t)+C5,ϕ1=C1u1C12u2C13u3+f1(t), ϕ2=C12u1C1u2C23u3+f2(t),ϕ3=C13u1+C23u2C1u3+f3(t), φ1=C1b1C12b2C13b3,φ2=C12b1C1b2C23b3, φ3=C13b1+C23b2C1b3,ψ1=2C1pxf1(t)yf2(t)zf3(t)+α(t), ψ2=2C1r+β(t). (4.22)

    Case 1. C1=C2=C3=C4=C5=C12=C13=C23=f1(t)=f2(t)=0, V_=α(t)p+β(t)r.

    For invariants

    ˉζ0=t, ˉζ1=x, ˉζ2=y, ˉζ3=z,F1(ˉζ0,ˉζ2)=u1, F2(ˉζ0,ˉζ1)=u2, F3(ˉζ0,ˉζ3)=u3,G1(ˉζ0,ˉζ2)=b1, G2(ˉζ0,ˉζ1)=b2, G3(ˉζ0,ˉζ3)=b3. (4.23)

    Substituting invariants (4.23) into (4.21), and solving the reduced equations,

    u1=g1etcosy, u2=g2etcosx, u3=c7,b1=g3etcosy, b2=g4etcosx, b3=c8,p=[cos(2y)g23g4+2g34sin2x+4g3(g22g24)sinxsiny]e2t4g4+m(t), r=n(t), (4.24)

    is a sin/cos-type solution for MHD equations (4.21), where g1g4g2g3=0. c7 and c8 are arbitrary constants. m(t) and n(t) are arbitrary functions related to t only.

    Case 2. C2=1, Ci=C12=C13=C23=fj(t)=α(t)=β(t)=0 (i=1,3,4,5,j=1,2,3), V_=t.

    The corresponding invariants are

    ˉζ1=x, ˉζ2=y, ˉζ3=z, Q(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=p, R(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=r,F1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u1, F2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u2, F3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=u3,G1(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b1, G2(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b2, G3(ˉζ1,ˉζ2,ˉζ3)=b3. (4.25)

    Substituting invariants (4.25) into (4.21), and solving the reduced equations,

    u1=sech2(x+iy), u2=isech2(x+iy), u3=c9, p=m,b1=sech2(x+iy), b2=isech2(x+iy), b3=c10, r=n, (4.26)

    is a sech-type solution for MHD equations (4.21), where c9 and c10 are arbitrary constants. Using symmetry V_=tx+ty+tz+u1+u2+u3, solution (4.26) can further generate the following invariant solution,

    u1=sech2(xεt+i(yεt))+ε, u2=isech2(xεt+i(yεt))+ε,u3=c9+ε, b1=sech2(xεt+i(yεt)), b2=isech2(xεt+i(yεt)),b3=c10, p=m(t), r=n(t). (4.27)

    Remark 4.2. (1) The lump solution (4.20) for inviscid MHD equations (4.10) also satisfies the viscous MHD equations (4.21).

    (2) If b1=b2=b3=0 and r=0 in (4.27), then (4.27) reduces to exact solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation.

    (3) Since ω=×U0 in (4.24) and ω=×U=0 in (4.27), it can be concluded that (4.24) corresponds to rotational flow. Moreover, (4.27) corresponds to inrotational flow.

    Using traveling wave transformation ζ=k2x+k3y+k4zk1t, Eq (4.1) are transformed into following ODEs as

    {k1u1ζν(k22u1ζζ+k23u1ζζ+k24u1ζζ)+k2u1u1ζ+k3u2u1ζ+k4u3u1ζ+κ(k2b2b2ζ+k2b3b3ζk3b2b1ζk4b3b1ζ)+k2pζ=0,k1u2ζν(k22u2ζζ+k23u2ζζ+k24u2ζζ)+k2u1u2ζ+k3u2u2ζ+k4u3u2ζ+κ(k3b1b1ζ+k3b3b3ζk2b1b2ζk4b3b2ζ)+k3pζ=0,k1u3ζν(k22u3ζζ+k23u3ζζ+k24u3ζζ)+k2u1u3ζ+k3u2u3ζ+k4u3u3ζ+κ(k4b1b1ζ+k4b2b2ζk2b1b3ζk3b2b3ζ)+k4pζ=0,k1b1ζη(k22b1ζζ+k23b1ζζ+k24b1ζζ)(k2b1u1ζ+k3b2u1ζ+k4b3u1ζ)+k2u1b1ζ+k3u2b1ζ+k4u3b1ζ+k2rζ=0,k1b2ζη(k22b2ζζ+k23b2ζζ+k24b2ζζ)(k2b1u2ζ+k3b2u2ζ+k4b3u2ζ)+k2u1b2ζ+k3u2b2ζ+k4u3b2ζ+k3rζ=0,k1b3ζη(k22b3ζζ+k23b3ζζ+k24b3ζζ)(k2b1u3ζ+k3b2u3ζ+k4b3u3ζ)+k2u1b3ζ+k3u2b3ζ+k4u3b3ζ+k4rζ=0,k2u1ζ+k3u2ζ+k4u3ζ=0, k2b1ζ+k3b2ζ+k4b3ζ=0. (4.28)

    Suppose that the solution of ODEs (4.28) can be expressed as a polynomial of ϕ(ζ) as follows.

    u1=N1i=0aiϕi(ζ), u2=N2i=0miϕi(ζ), u3=N3i=0diϕi(ζ), b1=N4i=0niϕi(ζ),b2=N5i=0siϕi(ζ), b3=N6i=0fiϕi(ζ), p=l(t)+N7i=0liϕi(ζ), r=q(t)+N8i=0qiϕi(ζ), (4.29)

    where ai,mi,di,ni,si,fi,li,qi are undetermined constants and aN1, mN2, dN3, nN4, sN5, fN60. l(t) and q(t) are arbitrary functions related to t only. ϕ(ζ) satisfies Eq (3.27). We choose N1=N2=N3=N4=N5=N6=N7=N8=2 with can balance the highest order of the derivative and nonlinear terms in ODEs.

    When ν=η=0 and κ=1 in ODEs (4.28), substituting (4.29) and (3.27) into (4.28), we collect the coefficients of ϕi(ζ) and set them to be zeros, we obtain

    a0=a0,a1=a1,a2=a2,d0=d0,d1=d1,d2=d2,f0=f0,f1=f1,f2=0,k1=k1,k2=k2,k3=k3,k4=k4,l1=(k22k23k24)f0f1k22+k23,l2=f21(k22+k23+k24)2(k22+k23),m0=a0k2k4d0+k1k3,m1=a1k2k4d1k3,m2=k2a2k4d2k3,n0=n0,n1=f1k2k4k22k23,n2=0,q1=0,q2=0,s0=k4f0k2n0k3,s1=f1k3k4k22k23,s2=0.

    Combined with the general solutions of (3.27) (c.f. [29]), it folllows from (4.29) that (4.30)–(4.38) are four kinds of solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional inviscid MHD equations.

    Case 1. When ξ214ξ2ξ0>0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tanh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a2ξ1a1ξ22ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+a2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.30)
    u2=4ξ22(a0k2d0k4+k1)+2ξ1ξ2(k2a1+d1k4)ξ21(k2a2+d2k4)4k3ξ22+ξ2(a1k2+d1k4)ξ1(k2a2+d2k4)2k3ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)k2a2+d2k44k3ξ22(ξ214ξ2ξ0)tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.31)
    u3=4d0ξ222d1ξ1ξ2+d2ξ214ξ22+d1ξ2+d2ξ12ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+d2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.32)
    b1=2n0ξ2(k22+k23)+f1k2k4ξ12ξ2(k22+k23)+f1k2k4ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2(k22+k23)tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.33)
    b2=2ξ2(k22+k23)(k4f0+k2n0)+k23f4f1ξ12k3ξ2(k22+k23)+k3f4f1ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2(k22+k23)tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.34)
    b3=2f0ξ2f1ξ12ξ2f1ξ214ξ2ξ02ξ2tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.35)

    where ζ=k2x+k3y+k4zk1t.

    Setting a0=6,a1=6,a2=2, d0=1,d1=3,d2=2,k1=2, k2=4,k3=1,k4=1,ξ0=1, ξ1=2,ξ2=3,y=1 and t=5 in (4.31), we obtain Figure 10 of kink solution u2 as follows.

    Figure 10.  (a) u2, (b) u2(z = 4, 5, 6).

    In particular, when ξ0=0 and ξ1ξ20, the following sinh-cosh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+a2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u2=a0k2d0k4+k1k3+(a1k2+d1k4)ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]k3ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C](k2a2+d2k4)ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2k3ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u3=d0d1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+d2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,b1=n0+f1k2k4ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)](k22+k23)ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C],b2=k4f0k2n0k3+k3k4f1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)](k22+k23)ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]b3=f0f1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C] (4.36)

    Setting a0=2,a1=2,a2=127,d0=10,d1=12,d2=3,k1=14,k2=7,k3=2, k4=2,ξ0=0,ξ1=1,ξ2=12,y=1,C=1 and x=5 in u2 in (4.36), we obtain Figure 11 of kink-like solution u2 as follows.

    Figure 11.  (a) u2, (b) u2(z = 4, 5, 6).

    Case 2. When ξ214ξ2ξ0<0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tan-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a1ξ2a2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+a2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),u2=4ξ22(a0k2d0k4+k1)+2ξ1ξ2(a1k2+d1k4)ξ21(k2a2+k4d2)4k3ξ22+ξ2(a1k2+d1k4)+ξ1(k2a2+k4d2)2k3ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)k2a2+k4d24k3ξ22(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),u3=4d0ξ222d1ξ1ξ2+d2ξ214ξ22+d1ξ2d2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+d2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),b1=2n0ξ2(k22+k23)+f1k2k4ξ12ξ2(k22+k23)f1k2k44ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2(k22+k23)tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),b2=2ξ2(k22+k23)(k4f0+k2n0)+k23k4f1ξ12k3ξ2(k22+k23)k3k4f14ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2(k22+k23)tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ),b3=2f0ξ2f1ξ12ξ2+f14ξ2ξ0ξ212ξ2tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ). (4.37)

    Case 3. When ξ1=ξ0=0 and ξ20, the following rational solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ2ζ+C+a2(ξ2ζ+C)2, u2=a0k2d0k4+k1k3+a1k2+d1k4k3(ξ2ζ+C)a2k2+d2k4k3(ξ2ζ+C)2,u3=d0d1ξ2ζ+C+d2(ξ2ζ+C)2, b1=n0+f1k2k4(k22+k23)(ξ2ζ+C),b2=k4f0k2n0k3+k3k4f1(k22+k23)(ξ2ζ+C), b3=f0f1ξ2ζ+C. (4.38)

    When ν=η=κ=1 in ODEs (4.28), substituting (4.29) and (3.27) into (4.28), we obtain

    a0=a0,a1=a1,a2=a2,d0=d0,d1=ia1k22+k23k2,d2=ia2k22+k23k2,f0=f0,f1=f1,f2=f2,k1=k1,k2=k2,k3=k3,k4=ik22+k23,m0=m0,m1=a1k3k2,m2=a2k3k2,n0=n0,n1=f1k2ik22+k23,n2=f2k2ik22+k23,s0=s0,s1=f1k3ik22+k23,
    s2=f2k3ik22+k23,l1=a1(a0k2id0k22+k23m0k3+k1)k2,l2=a2(i(a0k2+m0k3k1)k22+k23d0(k22+k23))ik2k22+k23,q1=(a1n0+f1d0)k2k3s0a1k2+(a0f1+a1f0)k22f1(m0k3+k1)k2+f0a1k23ik2k22+k23,q2=(a2n0+f2d0)k2k3s0a2k2+(a0f2+a2f0)k22f2(m0k3+k1)k2+f0a2k23ik2k22+k23.

    Combined with general solutions of (3.27) (c.f. [29]), it follows from (4.29) that (4.39)–(4.52) are four kinds of solutions for (3 + 1)-dimensional viscous MHD equations.

    Case 1. When ξ214ξ2ξ0>0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tanh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a2ξ1a1ξ22ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+a2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),  (4.39)
    u2=4m0k2ξ222a1k3ξ1ξ2+a2k3ξ214k2ξ22+k3(a1ξ2+a2ξ1)2k2ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+a2k3(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4k2ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),  (4.40)
    u3=d0+i(2a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ21)k22+k234k2ξ22+ia2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)k22+k234k2ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+i(a2ξ1a1ξ2)k22+k232k2ξ22ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ), (4.41)
    b1=n0+2f1k2ξ1ξ2+f2k2ξ21i4ξ22k22+k23+k2(f1ξ2+f2ξ1)i2ξ22k22+k23ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+f2k2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)i4ξ22k22+k23tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),  (4.42)
    b2=s0+2f1k3ξ1ξ2+f2k3ξ21i4ξ22k22+k23+k3(f1ξ2+f2ξ1)i2ξ22k22+k23ξ214ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+f2k3(ξ214ξ2ξ0)i4ξ22k22+k23tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ),  (4.43)
    b3=4f0ξ222f1ξ1ξ2+f2ξ214ξ22+f1ξ2+f2ξ12ξ22ξ124ξ2ξ0tanh(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ)+f2(ξ214ξ2ξ0)4ξ22tanh2(ξ214ξ2ξ02ζ). (4.44)

    Setting a1=1,a2=2,d0=1,k1=1,k2=1,k3=1,ξ0=2,ξ1=6,ξ2=3 and y=1 in (4.41), we obtain Figure 12 for solution u3 as follows.

    Figure 12.  (a) The evolution of interaction solution between anti-kink and solition wave via |u3|(t=1), (b) Overview of |u3|(t=1), (c) |u3|(t=1,2,3,z=1).

    In particular, when ξ0=0 and ξ1ξ20, the following sinh-cosh-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+a2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u2=m0a1k3ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]k2ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+a2k3ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2k2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,u3=d0ia1ξ1k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]k2ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+ia2ξ21k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2k2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2, b1=n0f1k2ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]iξ2k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+f2k2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2iξ22k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2,b2=s0f1k3ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]iξ2k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+f2k3ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2iξ22k22+k23[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2b3=f0f1ξ1[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]ξ2[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]+f2ξ21[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)]2ξ22[sinh(ξ1ζ)+cosh(ξ1ζ)+C]2. (4.45)

    Case 2. When ξ214ξ2ξ0<0 and ξ1ξ20 (or ξ0ξ20), the following tan-type solution can be obtained.

    u1=4a0ξ222a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ214ξ22+a1ξ2a2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+a2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (4.46)
    u2=4m0k2ξ222a1k3ξ1ξ2+a2k3ξ214k2ξ22+k3(a1ξ2a2ξ1)2k2ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+a2k3(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4k2ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (4.47)
    u3=d0+i(2a1ξ1ξ2+a2ξ21)k22+k234k2ξ22+ia2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)k22+k234k2ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+i(a1ξ2a2ξ1)k22+k232k2ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (4.48)
    b1=n0+k2(2f1ξ1ξ2+f2ξ21)i4ξ22k22+k23+k2(f1ξ2f2ξ1)i2ξ22k22+k234ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+f2k2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)i4ξ22k22+k23tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (4.49)
    b2=s0+k3(2f1ξ1ξ2+f2ξ21)i4ξ22k22+k23+k3(f1ξ2f2ξ1)i2ξ22k22+k234ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+k3f2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)i4ξ22k22+k23tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ), (4.50)
    b3=4f0ξ222f1ξ1ξ2+f2ξ214ξ22+f1ξ2f2ξ12ξ224ξ2ξ0ξ21tan(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ)+f2(4ξ2ξ0ξ21)4ξ22tan2(4ξ2ξ0ξ212ζ). (4.51)

    Case 3. When ξ1=ξ0=0 and ξ20, the following rational solution can be obtained.

    u1=a0a1ξ2ζ+C+a2(ξ2ζ+C)2, b1=n0f1k2ik22+k23(ξ2ζ+C)+f2k2ik22+k23(ξ2ζ+C)2,u3=d0ia1k22+k23k2(ξ2ζ+C)+ia2k22+k23k2(ξ2ζ+C)2, u2=m0a1k3k2(ξ2ζ+C)+a2k3k2(ξ2ζ+C)2, b2=s0f1k3ik22+k23(ξ2ζ+C)+f2k3ik22+k23(ξ2ζ+C)2 b3=f0f1ξ2ζ+C+f2(ξ2ζ+C)2. (4.52)

    Setting a1=2i,a2=i,d0=2,k1=3,k2=2,k3=2,ξ0=0,ξ1=0,ξ2=1,C=1,z=2 and x=15 for u3 in (4.52), we obtain Figure 13 for bright–dark soliton solution u3 as follows.

    Figure 13.  (a) |u3|, (b) |u3|(t = 1, 2, 3).

    We analyze the continuous dependence of solution for MHD equations (2.2) on initial data, or namely the stability of MHD equations (2.2) from a qualitative perspective.

    Lemma 5.1. [31] For q[2,), there exists C>0 such that for fH1(R2),

    (5.1)

    Lemma 5.2. [32] For p \in [2, 6] , there exists C > 0 such that for g\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^3) ,

    \begin{equation} \left\| {g} \right\|_{L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^3 )}^{p}\le C\left\| {{g}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}(\mathbb{R}^3 )}}^{{(6-p)}/{2}\;}\left\| {\nabla{{{g}}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}(\mathbb{R}^3 )}}^{{(3p-6)}/{2}\;}. \end{equation} (5.2)

    Theorem 5.3. For n = 2, 3 , if the initial data {\mathbf{U}_{0}}, {\mathbf{B}_{0}}\in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}))}^{n}} , then the solutions (\mathbf{U}, \mathbf{B}) for the (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations (2.2) with periodic boundary condition at infinity depend on the initial data continuously in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}))}^{n}} .

    Proof. Let ({\mathbf{U}_{1}}, {\mathbf{B}_{1}}) and ({\mathbf{U}_{2}}, {\mathbf{B}_{2}}) be two solutions to MHD equations (2.2) with initial data {\mathbf{U}_{0}}, {\mathbf{B}_{0}}\in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}))}^{n}} . Set \tilde{\mathbf{U}} = {\mathbf{U}_{1}}-{\mathbf{U}_{2}} , \tilde{\mathbf{B}} = {\mathbf{B}_{1}}-{\mathbf{B}_{2}} , \tilde{p} = {{p}_{1}}-{{p}_{2}} , \tilde{r} = {{r}_{1}}-{{r}_{2}} , then (\tilde{\mathbf{U}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}}) is the solution to the following system,

    \left\{\begin{array}{l} \tilde{\mathbf{U}}_t-\nu \Delta \tilde{\mathbf{U}}+((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}_{1}}+({\mathbf{U}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{U}})\kappa((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}+({\mathbf{B}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{B}})+\nabla \tilde{p}\\ +\frac{1}{2}\kappa\nabla(\vert\mathbf{B}_1{{\vert}^{2}}-\vert\mathbf{B}_2{{\vert}^{2}}) = 0, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.3)\\ \tilde{\mathbf{B}}_t-\eta \Delta \tilde{\mathbf{B}}+((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}+({\mathbf{U}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{B}})-((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}_{1}}+({\mathbf{B}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{U}})+\nabla\tilde{r} = 0, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.4)\\ \operatorname{div}\ \tilde{\mathbf{U}} = 0, \ \operatorname{div}\ \tilde{\mathbf{B}} = 0. \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.5) \end{array}\right.

    Case 1. n = 2 .

    It follows from H \ddot{\text{o}} lder inequality and Lemma 5.1 that

    \begin{equation} -((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}})\le {{\left\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \right\|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{4}}}^{2}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}, \end{equation} (5.6)
    \begin{equation} ((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{4}}}^{2}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}, \end{equation} (5.7)
    \begin{equation} ((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|}_{{{L}^{4}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|}_{{{L}^{4}}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}, \end{equation} (5.8)
    \begin{equation} -((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|}_{{{L}^{4}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|}_{{{L}^{4}}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{equation} (5.9)

    Take L^{2} inner product of (5.3) with {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} and (5.4) with {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} , respectively. Without loss of generality, choose \nu = \eta = \kappa = 1 in (5.3) and (5.4). Since

    \begin{equation} (({\mathbf{U}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{U}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}}) = 0, \ \ (({\mathbf{U}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{B}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}}) = 0, \ \ (({\mathbf{B}_{2}}\cdot \nabla )\tilde{\mathbf{B}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}})+(({\mathbf{B}_{2}}\cdot \nabla) \tilde{\mathbf{U}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}}) = 0, \end{equation} (5.10)

    and

    \begin{equation} (\nabla (\tilde{p}+\frac{1}{2}\kappa(\vert\mathbf{B}_1{{\vert}^{2}}-\vert\mathbf{B}_2{{\vert}^{2}})), \tilde{\mathbf{U}}) = 0, \ \ (\nabla \tilde{r} , \tilde{\mathbf{B}}) = 0, \end{equation} (5.11)

    using (5.6)–(5.11), we have

    \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \frac{d}{dt}(\left\| \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2})+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2} \\ \le & C{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}+C {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{}}\\ +&2C{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned} \end{equation} (5.12)

    where C = 2{{C}_{0}} . It follows from Young inequality and (5.12) that

    \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \frac{d}{dt}(\left\| \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2})+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2} \\ \le & \frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}\left( \left\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2} \right)\left( \left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2} \right)+\left(\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}\right). \end{aligned} \end{equation} (5.13)

    Using Gr \ddot{\text{o}} nwall's inequality, \left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}\le M{{ (\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}) \vert }_{t = {{t}_{0}}}}. Then, solution (\mathbf{U}, \mathbf{B}) for (2 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations (2.2) with periodic boundary condition at infinity depends on the initial data continuously in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}))}^{2}} .

    Case 2. n = 3 .

    It follows from H \ddot{\text{o}} lder inequality and Lemma 5.2 that

    \begin{equation} -((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}})\le {{\left\| \nabla {\mathbf{\mathbf{U}}_{1}} \right\|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{3}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{6}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{\frac{1}{2}}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{{\frac{3}{2}}}, \end{equation} (5.14)
    \begin{equation} ((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla ){\mathbf{U}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{3}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{6}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{3}{2}}. \end{equation} (5.15)
    \begin{equation} ((\tilde{\mathbf{B}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{U}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|}_{{{L}^{3}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|}_{{{L}^{6}}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}, \end{equation} (5.16)
    \begin{equation} -((\tilde{\mathbf{U}}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}_{1}}, \tilde{\mathbf{B}})\le {{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|}_{{{L}^{3}}}}{{\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \|}_{{{L}^{6}}}}\le C_0{{\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \|}_{{{L}^{2}}}}\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_{{{L}^{2}}}. \end{equation} (5.17)

    Using Young inequality with \varepsilon , without loss of generality, choosing \nu = \eta = \kappa = 1 in (5.3) and (5.4), there exists \varepsilon < \frac{2}{3} such that

    \begin{aligned} &\frac{d}{dt}( \left\| \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2})+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+2\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2} \\ \le & C(\varepsilon )(\left\| \nabla {\mathbf{U}_{1}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{4}+\left\| \nabla {\mathbf{B}_{1}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{4})(\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{U}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| {\tilde{\mathbf{B}}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2})+3 \varepsilon (\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{U}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}+\left\| \nabla \tilde{\mathbf{B}} \right\|_{{{L}^{2}}}^{2}). \end{aligned}

    Similarly, using Gr \ddot{\text{o}} nwall's inequality, it can be obtained that solution (\mathbf{U}, \mathbf{B}) for (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations (2.2) with periodic boundary condition at infinity depends on the initial data continuously in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{3}}))}^{3}} .

    Next, we further analyze the stability of MHD equations (2.2) combining with the exact solutions obtained above from a quantitative perspective, which provide an accurate mathematical description for the stability of MHD systems. Denote {\bar{\mathbf{U}}} = \mathbf{U}+\mathbf{U}' , \bar{\mathbf{B}} = \mathbf{B}+\mathbf{B}' , where \mathbf{U}', \mathbf{B}' are disturbances to the velocity and magnetic field, respectively. (\mathbf{U}, \mathbf{B}) and (\bar{\mathbf{U}}, \bar{\mathbf{B}}) are solutions before and after being affected by disturbances, respectively. Therefore \mathbf{U}', \mathbf{B}' satisfy the following system

    \left\{\begin{array}{l} {\mathbf{U}'_t}-\nu \Delta {\mathbf{U}'}+(({\mathbf{U}'}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}}+(({\mathbf{U}+\mathbf{U}'})\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}'})-\kappa(({\mathbf{B}'}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}}+(({\mathbf{B}+\mathbf{B}'})\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}'})\\ +\nabla {p}'+\frac{1}{2}\kappa\nabla(-\vert\mathbf{B}{{\vert}^{2}}+\vert\mathbf{B}+\mathbf{B}'{{\vert}^{2}}) = 0, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.18)\\ {\mathbf{B}'_t}-\eta \Delta {\mathbf{B}'}+(({\mathbf{U}'}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}}+(({\mathbf{U}+\mathbf{U}'})\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{B}'})-(({\mathbf{B}'}\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}}+(({\mathbf{B}+\mathbf{B}'})\cdot \nabla) {\mathbf{U}'})\\ +\nabla{r}' = 0, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.19)\\ \operatorname{div}{\mathbf{U}'} = 0, \ \operatorname{div}{\mathbf{B}'} = 0. \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5.20) \end{array}\right.

    We select several obtained exact solutions of MHD system to study the impact of disturbances on stability of the system.

    Case 1. Harmonic disturbance.

    The initial disturbance is

    {{{u}'_{1}}}({{t}_{0}}, x, y) = A_1\cos (\frac{2\pi }{w_1}(x-y-({{\bar{v}}_{1}}-{{\bar{v}}_{2}}){{t}_{0}})), \ \ {{{u}'_{2}}}({{t}_{0}}, x, y) = A_2\cos (\frac{2\pi }{w_2}(x-y-({{\bar{v}}_{1}}-{{\bar{v}}_{2}}){{t}_{0}})),

    where A_1, \ A_2 are amplitude of disturbance waves. We analyze the behavior of u_1 , u_2 in (3.13) after being affected by disturbances {{{u}'_{1}}}({{t}}, x, y) , {{{u}'_{2}}}({{t}}, x, y) . Set A_i = 0.1, w_i = 5\ (i = 1, 2) , the evolution of u_1+{u'_{1}} can be displayed intuitively as following Figure 14 ( u_2+{u'_{2}} is similar).

    Figure 14.  (a) u_1+{u'_{1}} , (b) u_1+{u'_{1}} ( t = 1, 3, 5).

    From Figure 14, it can be seen that with the evolution of time, the amplitude of \mathbf{U} under the influence of the harmonic disturbance is limited. The solutions (\mathbf{U}, \mathbf{B}) for the (2 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations (2.2) depend on the initial data continuously in {{({{L}^{2}}({{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}))}^{2}} , which is also consistent with the conclusion of qualitative analysis.

    Case 2. Bell shaped solitary wave disturbance.

    The initial disturbance is

    {{{u}'_{1}}}({{t}_{0}}, x, y) = A_1\operatorname{sech} (\frac{2\pi }{w_1}(x-y-({{\bar{v}}_{1}}-{{\bar{v}}_{2}}){{t}_{0}})), \ \ {{{u}'_{2}}}({{t}_{0}}, x, y) = A_2\operatorname{sech} (\frac{2\pi }{w_2}(x-y-({{\bar{v}}_{1}}-{{\bar{v}}_{2}}){{t}_{0}})),

    where A_1, \ A_2 are amplitude of disturbance waves. We analyze the behavior of u_1 , u_2 in (3.14) after being affected by disturbances {{{u}'_{1}}}({{t}}, x, y) , {{{u}'_{2}}}({{t}}, x, y) . Set A_i = 0.1, w_i = 5(i = 1, 2) , the evolution of u_1+{u'_{1}} can be displayed intuitively as following Figure 15 ( u_2+{u'_{2}} is similar).

    Figure 15.  u_1+{u'_{1}} ( t = 1, \ 4, \ 7 , respectively).

    From Figure 15, it can be seen that the amplitude of \mathbf{U} under the influence of the Bell shaped solitary wave disturbance has increased but is limited. The velocity \mathbf{U} under the influence of Bell shaped solitary wave disturbance is stable.

    In this paper, several novel classes of solutions and stability analysis are presented for MHD flows. When the magnetic field vanishes, some of the exact solutions can be reduced to solutions of Euler or Navier-Stokes equation. Through Lie symmetry analysis and the generalized Riccati equation expansion method, the MHD system achieves order reduction and dimensionality reduction, and the complex nonlinear and strongly coupled terms in fluid dynamics systems are handled technically. The Lie group of transformations and the similarity reductions of (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional inviscid and viscous MHD equations are studied. The exact solutions with rich forms are obtained, which can describe certain solition-like surface waves, such as periodic solution, single soliton solution, and lump solution. The mechanisms of rotational and irrotational fluids are analyzed. Furthermore, using the generalized Riccati equation expansion method, we obtain miscellaneous traveling wave solutions, including kink, kink-like, anti-kink-like, breather, and interaction solutions. In addition, the continuous dependence of solutions for MHD equations for initial values is studied from qualitative and quantitative perspectives.

    Compared with the related work, the novelty of this paper lies in that we consider the problem from multiple perspectives and obtain new exact solutions. For instance, Dorodnitsyn et al. [23] studied (1 + 1)-dimensional inviscid MHD flows in the mass Lagrangian coordinates, while we studied from the perspective of both inviscid and viscous of (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations. Liu et al. [24] obtained analytical solutions of (2 + 1) -dimensional inviscid incompressible MHD equations by Lie symmetry analysis. Picard et al. [26] obtained some exact solutions of (3 + 1)-dimensional inviscid MHD equations by the symmetry reduction method. We used Lie symmetry analysis as well as generalized Riccati equation expansion methods to study both inviscid and viscous of (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations. Moreover, based on the study, we obtain new exact solutions with richer forms. Xia et al. [25] used the Lie symmetry method to obtain some exact solutions of (2 + 1)-dimensional incompressible ideal MHD equations. Cheung et al. [33] obtained bounded soliton solutions of (2 + 1)-dimensional incompressible MHD equations. However, we obtain some new exact solutions for both inviscid and viscous of (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD equations, such as lump solutions, kink solutions, kink-like solution, breather solutions, and interaction solution between anti-kink and solition. Ayub et al. [34] studied solitary wave solutions for two-dimensional viscous incompressible MHD flow regarding space evolution, while we studied from the perspective of both inviscid and viscous of (2 + 1)- and (3 + 1)-dimensional MHD flows, which consider both time and space evolution.

    The exact solutions we obtain can correspond to different physical behaviors for MHD flows. For instance, solitons can maintain their shape and thier amplitude is unchanged during propagation. This property is important for understanding and predicting some wave propagations in MHD flow. Soliton waves can be used to describe some wave phenomena in plasma, which has potential application value for achieving and maintaining the stability of fusion plasma. Periodic solutions can describe some periodic oscillation phenomena in MHD flow. Lump solution can correspond to waves that are localized in time and space, while the amplitude of peak and valley is several times higher than the surrounding background height. Breather solutions can explain MHD flow that exhibits periodicity in certain direction and locality in other directions. The kink and kink-like solutions can manifest as a rapid change or discontinuity in some fields at the macro level. Considering the physical significance and the importance of studying analytical solutions of MHD equations, compressible case and MHD systems with other factors such as time-dependent density and Coriolis force deserve to be further studied.

    Shengfang Yang worked on conceptualization, writing-original draft, formal analysis, software. Huanhe Dong worked on conceptualization, resources, validation, supervision. Mingshuo Liu worked on methodology, writing-review & editing, formal analysis, validation.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12105161, 12305003).

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] E. Crosas-Molist, R. Samain, L. Kohlhammer, J. L. Orgaz, S. L. George, O. Maiques, et al., Rho gtpase signaling in cancer progression and dissemination, Phys. Rev., 102 (2022), 455–510. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00045.2020 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2020
    [2] A. F. Chambers, A. C. Groom, I. C. MacDonald, Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2 (2002), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc865 doi: 10.1038/nrc865
    [3] M. S. Pepe, R. Etzioni, Z. Feng, J. D. Potter, M. L. Thompson, M. Thornquist, et al., Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer, JNCI-J NATL Cancer I, 93 (2001), 1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc865 doi: 10.1038/nrc865
    [4] R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, H. J. Eyre, American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006, CA Cancer J. Clin., 56 (2006), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.1.8 doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.1.8
    [5] M. Richards, The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in england, Br. J. Cancer, 101 (2009), S125–S129. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605402 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605402
    [6] X. Chen, J. Gole, A. Gore, Q. He, M. Lu, J. Min, et al., Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test, Nat. Commun., 11 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17316-z doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17316-z
    [7] R. Guo, G. Lu, B. Qin. B. Fei, Ultrasound imaging technologies for breast cancer detection and management: A review, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 44 (2018), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012
    [8] K. Bouchelouche, B. Turkbey, P. Choyke, J. Capala, Imaging prostate cancer: An update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, Curr. Urol. Rep., 11 (2010), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0105-9 doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0105-9
    [9] Q. Zhou, J. Dong, J. He, D. Liu, D. H. Tian, S. Gao, et al., The society for translational medicine: indications and methods of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy for diagnosis of lung cancer, J. Thorac. Dis., 10 (2018), 5538. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.09.28 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.28
    [10] E. I. Kreydin, B. H. Eisner, Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery, Nat. Rev. Urol., 10 (2013), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.183 doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.183
    [11] L. Lehrskov, M. Westen, S. Larsen, A. Jensen, B. Kristensen, T. Bisgaard, Fluorescence or x-ray cholangiography in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial, Br. J. Surg., 107 (2020), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11510 doi: 10.1002/bjs.11510
    [12] H. Su, W. Qi, J. Chen, D. Zhang, Fuzzy approximation-based task-space control of robot manipulators with remote center of motion constraint, IEEE Transact. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 1564–1573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3157075 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3157075
    [13] R. Barua, S. Datta, Modernization of robotics application in 21st century: A review, J Mech Robot, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.46610/JMMDM.2020.05102.005 doi: 10.46610/JMMDM.2020.05102.005
    [14] H. Su, W. Qi, Y. Hu, H. R. Karimi, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, An incremental learning framework for human-like redundancy optimization of anthropomorphic manipulators, IEEE Transact. Indust. Inform., 18 (2020), 1864–1872. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3036693 doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3036693
    [15] W. Qi, H. Su, A cybertwin based multimodal network for ecg patterns monitoring using deep learning, IEEE Transact. Indust. Inform., 18 (2022), 6663–6670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3159583 doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3159583
    [16] H. Qiao, J. Chen, X. Huang, A survey of brain-inspired intelligent robots: Integration of vision, decision, motion control, and musculoskeletal systems, IEEE Transact. Cybernet., 52 (2022), 11267–11280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3071312 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3071312
    [17] A. Joseph, B. Christian, A. A. Abiodun, F. Oyawale, A review on humanoid robotics in healthcare, in MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 153, EDP Sciences, 2018, 02004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815302004
    [18] S. Chen, F. Wang, Y. Lin, Q. Shi, Y. Wang, Ultrasound-guided needle insertion robotic system for percutaneous puncture, Int. J. CARS., 16 (2021), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02300-1 doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02300-1
    [19] B. Zhao, Y. Fu, Y. Yang, P. Zhang, Y. Hu, Design and control of a mri-compatible pneumatic needle puncture robot, Comput. Assist Surg., 24 (2019), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2019.1649067 doi: 10.1080/24699322.2019.1649067
    [20] H. Su, W. Qi, Y. Schmirander, S. E. Ovur, S. Cai, X. Xiong, A human activity-aware shared control solution for medical human–robot interaction, Assembly Autom., 42 (2022), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-2021-0174 doi: 10.1108/AA-12-2021-0174
    [21] L. Zhang, C. Li, Y. Fan, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, Physician-friendly tool center point calibration method for robot-assisted puncture surgery, Sensors, 21 (2021), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020366 doi: 10.3390/s21020366
    [22] H. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Li, J. Zhang, A novel manipulator with needle insertion forces feedback for robot-assisted lumbar puncture, Int. J. Med. Robot., 17 (2021), e2226. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2226 doi: 10.1002/rcs.2226
    [23] H. Su, A. Mariani, S. E. Ovur, A. Menciassi, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, Toward teaching by demonstration for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, IEEE Transact. Autom. Sci. Eng., 18 (2021), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2020.3045655 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2020.3045655
    [24] M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, et al., The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, Syst. Rev., 10 (2021), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
    [25] P. Zamora-Ortiz, J. Carral-Alvaro, Á. Valera, J. L. Pulloquinga, R. J. Escarabajal, V. Mata, Identification of inertial parameters for position and force control of surgical assistance robots, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070773 doi: 10.3390/math9070773
    [26] S. Mukai, H. Egi, M. Hattori, Y. Sumi, Y. Kurita, H. Ohdan, Omnidirectional camera and head-mount display contribute to the safety of laparoscopic surgery, Minim Invasiv. Ther., 31 (2022), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1851725 doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1851725
    [27] C. Bergeles, G.-Z. Yang, From passive tool holders to microsurgeons: safer, smaller, smarter surgical robots, IEEE Transact. Biomed. Eng., 61 (2013), 1565–1576. https://doi.org/0.1109/TBME.2013.2293815 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2293815
    [28] T. Cheng, W. Li, C. S. H. Ng, P. W. Y. Chiu, Z. Li, Visual servo control of a novel magnetic actuated endoscope for uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery, IEEE Robot. Autom. Letters, 4 (2019), 3098–3105. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2924838 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2924838
    [29] M. G. Fujie, B. Zhang, State-of-the-art of intelligent minimally invasive surgical robots, Front. Med., 14 (2020), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0743-3 doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0743-3
    [30] K. Safiejko, R. Tarkowski, M. Koselak, M. Juchimiuk, A. Tarasik, M. Pruc, et al., Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients, Cancers, 14 (2022), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010180 doi: 10.3390/cancers14010180
    [31] F.-H. Meng, Y. Song, B. Qiao, N.-H. Jin, Y.-M. Zhu, B.-F. Liang, et al., Image-guided, surgical robot-assisted percutaneous puncture of the foramen ovale and foramina stylomastoideum: A cadaveric study, Chin. Med. J., 134 (2021), 2362–2364. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001783 doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001783
    [32] H. Park, K. N. Han, B. H. Choi, H. Yoon, H. J. An, J. S. Lee, et al., Ultra-low-dose intraoperative x-ray imager for minimally invasive surgery: a pilot imaging study, Trans. Lung Cancer Res., 11 (2022), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-909 doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-909
    [33] S. Lim, C. Jun, D. Chang, D. Petrisor, M. Han, D. Stoianovici, Robotic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, IEEE Transact. Biomed. Eng., 66 (2019), 2527–2537. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2891240 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2891240
    [34] Y. Gao, X. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Zhou, W. Jiang, L. Chen, et al., A dual-armed robotic puncture system: Design, implementation and preliminary tests, Electronics, 11 (2022), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050740 doi: 10.3390/electronics11050740
    [35] J. Tan, B. Li, Y. Li, B. Li, X. Chen, J. Wu, et al., A flexible and fully autonomous breast ultrasound scanning system, IEEE Transact. Autom. Sci. Eng.. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3189339
    [36] T. Lakhanpal, B. R. Mittal, R. Kumar, A. Watts, N. Rana, H. Singh, Radiation exposure to the personnel performing robotic arm-assisted positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided biopsies, Indian J. Nucl. Med., 33 (2018), 209. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM-31-18 doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM-31-18
    [37] J. Ghelfi, A. Moreau-Gaudry, N. Hungr, C. Fouard, B. Veron, M. Medici, et al., Evaluation of the needle positioning accuracy of a light puncture robot under mri guidance: Results of a clinical trial on healthy volunteers, Cardiov. Int. Radiol., 41 (2018), 1428–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2001-5 doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2001-5
    [38] M. Anvari, T. Chapman, K. Barlow, T. Cookson, C. Van Toen, T. Fielding, Clinical safety and efficacy of a fully automated robot for magnetic resonance imaging-guided breast biopsy, Int. J. Med. Robot. Comp., e2472. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2472
    [39] C. Song, Z. Yang, S. Jiang, Z. Zhou, D. Zhang, An integrated navigation system based on a dedicated breast support device for mri-guided breast biopsy, Int. J. Comput. Assist Radiol. Surg., 17 (2022), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02640-0 doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02640-0
    [40] J. C. Vilanova, A. Pérez de Tudela, J. Puig, M. Hoogenboom, J. Barceló, M. Planas, et al., Robotic-assisted transrectal mri-guided biopsy. technical feasibility and role in the current diagnosis of prostate cancer: An initial single-center experience, Abdom Radio, 45 (2020), 4150–4159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02665-6 doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02665-6
    [41] E. Ben-David, M. Shochat, I. Roth, I. Nissenbaum, J. Sosna, S. N. Goldberg, Evaluation of a ct-guided robotic system for precise percutaneous needle insertion, J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 29 (2018), 1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.002
    [42] A. Nagao, T. Matsuno, T. Kamegawa, T. Hiraki, Installation angle offset compensation of puncture robot based on measurement of needle by CT equipment, Int. J. Mechatron. Autom., 6 (2018), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2017.8015859 doi: 10.1109/ICMA.2017.8015859
    [43] M. Kostrzewa, A. Rothfuss, T. Pätz, M. Kühne, S. O. Schoenberg, S. J. Diehl, et al., Robotic assistance system for cone-beam computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle placement, Cardiov. Int. Radiol., 45 (2022), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02938-7 doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02938-7
    [44] X. Chen, Y. Yan, A. Li, T. Wang, Y. Wang, Robot-assisted needle insertion for ct-guided puncture: Experimental study with a phantom and animals, Cardiov. Int. Radiol., 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03301-0
    [45] L. Lei, H. Tang, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, B. Zhao, Y. Hu, et al., Automatic registration and precise tumour localization method for robot-assisted puncture procedure under inconsistent breath-holding conditions, Int. J. Med. Robot., 17 (2021), e2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2319 doi: 10.1002/rcs.2319
    [46] Y. Croissant, S. Zangos, M. H. Albrecht, K. Eichler, C. Schomerus, A. Spandorfer, et al., Robot-assisted percutaneous placement of k-wires during minimally invasive interventions of the spine, Minim Invas. Ther., 28 (2019), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2018.1544567 doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1544567
    [47] Z. Han, K. Yu, L. Hu, W. Li, H. Yang, M. Gan, et al., A targeting method for robot-assisted percutaneous needle placement under fluoroscopy guidance, Comput. Assist Surg., 24 (2019), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1557907 doi: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1557907
    [48] S. Said, P. Clauser, N. Ruiter, P. Baltzer, T. Hopp, Image registration between mri and spot mammograms for x-ray guided stereotactic breast biopsy: Preliminary results, in Medical Imaging 2021: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, vol. 11598, SPIE, 2021,354–361. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581820
    [49] S. Said, P. Clauser, N. Ruiter, P. Baltzer, T. Hopp, Image based registration between full x-ray and spot mammograms for x-ray guided stereotactic breast biopsy, in Medical Imaging 2022: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, vol. 12034, SPIE, 2022,614–621. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2611509
    [50] M. K. Welleweerd, D. Pantelis, A. G. de Groot, F. J. Siepel, S. Stramigioli, Robot-assisted ultrasound-guided biopsy on mr-detected breast lesions, in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2020, 2965–2971. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341695
    [51] S. Xiao, C. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Yu, L. Xiong, C. Peng, et al., Visual optimization of ultrasound-guided robot-assisted procedures using variable impedance control, in 2021 WRC Symposium on Advanced Robotics and Automation (WRC SARA), IEEE, 2021,128–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/WRCSARA53879.2021.9612667
    [52] M. Schlüter, S. Gerlach, C. Fürweger, A. Schlaefer, Analysis and optimization of the robot setup for robotic-ultrasound-guided radiation therapy, Int. J. CARS., 14 (2019), 1379–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02009-w doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02009-w
    [53] J. Berger, M. Unger, J. Keller, C. M. Reich, T. Neumuth, A. Melzer, Design and validation of a medical robotic device system to control two collaborative robots for ultrasound-guided needle insertions, Front. Robot. AI, 9 (2022), 875845. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.875845 doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.875845
    [54] M. Z. Mahmoud, M. Aslam, M. Alsaadi, M. A. Fagiri, B. Alonazi, Evolution of robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsy systems, J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sc., 11 (2018), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2017.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2017.11.005
    [55] M. K. Welleweerd, F. J. Siepel, V. Groenhuis, J. Veltman, S. Stramigioli, Design of an end-effector for robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, Int. J. CARS., 15 (2020), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02122-1 doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02122-1
    [56] A. Nath, A. Prashanth, H. Lal, S. Kumar, S. Barai, S. Gambhir, Robotic-assisted computed tomography-guided 18f-fdg pet/computed tomography-directed biopsy for diagnosis of intra thoracic lesions: An experience from a tertiary care centre in north India, Nucl. Med. Commun., 41 (2020), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001148 doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001148
    [57] B. Mittal, R. Kumar, H. Singh, A. Watts, N. Rana, A. Bhattacharya, Robotic arm assisted real time ga-68 labelled tracer (dotanoc and psma) pet/ct guided percutaneous biopsies, J Nucl Med., 59 (2018). https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/supplement-1/1494
    [58] R. Kumar, B. Mittal, A. Bhattacharya, S. Vadi, H. Singh, A. Bal, et al., Positron emission tomography/computed tomography guided percutaneous biopsies of ga-68 avid lesions using an automated robotic arm, Diagn. Interv. Imag., 101 (2020), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.10.006
    [59] K. Deva, N. Rana, R. Kumar, B. R. Mittal, Evaluation of radiation exposure to the patients undergoing positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided biopsies, Indian J. Nucl. Med., 37 (2022), 23. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm-112-21 doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm-112-21
    [60] E. Mendoza, J. P. Whitney, A testbed for haptic and magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous needle biopsy, IEEE Robot. Autom. Letters, 4 (2019), 3177–3183. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2925558 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2925558
    [61] Z. He, Z. Dong, G. Fang, J. D.-L. Ho, C.-L. Cheung, H.-C. Chang, et al., Design of a percutaneous mri-guided needle robot with soft fluid-driven actuator, IEEE Robot. Autom. Letters, 5 (2020), 2100–2107. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2969929 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2969929
    [62] N. A. Patel, G. Li, W. Shang, M. Wartenberg, T. Heffter, E. C. Burdette, et al., System integration and preliminary clinical evaluation of a robotic system for mri-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, J. Med. Robot. Res., 4 (2019), 1950001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424905X19500016 doi: 10.1142/S2424905X19500016
    [63] M. I. Patel, S. Muter, P. Vladica, D. Gillatt, Robotic-assisted magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion results in higher significant cancer detection compared to cognitive prostate targeting in biopsy naive men, Transl. Androl. Urol., 9 (2020), 601. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.33 doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.33
    [64] M. Sandahl, K. J. Sandahl, E. Marinovskij, T. F. Nielsen, K. D. Sørensen, M. Borre, et al., Prostate cancer detection rate of manually operated and robot-assisted in-bore magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy, Eur. Urol., 41 (2022), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.002
    [65] M. Giannakou, C. Yiallouras, G. Menikou, C. Ioannides, C. Damianou, Mri-guided frameless biopsy robotic system with the inclusion of unfocused ultrasound transducer for brain cancer ablation, Int. J. Med. Robot., 15 (2019), e1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1951 doi: 10.1002/rcs.1951
    [66] E. W. Johnston, N. Fotiadis, C. Cummings, J. Basso, T. Tyne, J. Lameijer, et al., Developing and testing a robotic mri/ct fusion biopsy technique using a purpose-built interventional phantom, Eur. Radiol. Exp., 6 (2022), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00308-7 doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00308-7
    [67] W. Liu, Z. Yang, S. Jiang, D. Feng, D. Zhang, Design and implementation of a new cable-driven robot for mri-guided breast biopsy, Int. J. Med. Robot. Comp., 16 (2020), e2063. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2063 doi: 10.1002/rcs.2063
    [68] G. P. Ghantasala, N. V. Kumari, Breast cancer treatment using automated robot support technology for mri breast biopsy, Int. J. Educ. Soc. Sci. Linguist., 1 (2021), 235–242. http://internationaljournal.unigha.ac.id/index.php/IJESLi/article/view/63
    [69] P. Moreira, N. Patel, M. Wartenberg, G. Li, K. Tuncali, T. Heffter, et al., Evaluation of robot-assisted mri-guided prostate biopsy: needle path analysis during clinical trials, Phys. Med. Biol., 63 (2018), 20NT02. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aae214 doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae214
    [70] W. K. Ma, B. S. Ho, A. S. Lai, K. C. Lam, Y. S. Chan, L. K. Yip, et al., Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy with semi-robotic navigation in the chinese population: Initial results, Asian J. Androl., 20 (2018), 93. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.196855 doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.196855
    [71] M. Barral, A. Lefevre, P. Camparo, M. Hoogenboom, T. Pierre, P. Soyer, et al., In-bore transrectal mri–guided biopsy with robotic assistance in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: An analysis of 57 patients, AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 213 (2019), W171–W179. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21145 doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21145
    [72] A. Smakic, N. Rathmann, M. Kostrzewa, S. O. Schönberg, C. Weiß, S. J. Diehl, Performance of a robotic assistance device in computed tomography-guided percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, Cardiov, Int, Radiol., 41 (2018), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1841-8 doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1841-8
    [73] S. Levy, S. N. Goldberg, I. Roth, M. Shochat, J. Sosna, I. Leichter, et al., Clinical evaluation of a robotic system for precise ct-guided percutaneous procedures, Abdom Radiol., 46 (2021), 5007–5016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03175-9 doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03175-9
    [74] T. de Baere, C. Roux, G. Noel, A. Delpla, F. Deschamps, E. Varin, et al., Robotic assistance for percutaneous needle insertion in the kidney: Preclinical proof on a swine animal model, Eur. Radiol. Exp., 6 (2022), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00265-1 doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00265-1
    [75] Y. Takahashi, K. Izumi, R. Saito, I. Ikeda, R. Tsumura, H. Iwata, Development of needle guide unit considering buckling bone-perforation control strategy based on computed tomography-guided needle insertion robot, in Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., IEEE, 2022, 4391–4396. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871709
    [76] T. Hiraki, T. Kamegawa, T. Matsuno, J. Sakurai, T. Komaki, T. Yamaguchi, et al., Robotic needle insertion during computed tomography fluoroscopy–guided biopsy: Prospective first-in-human feasibility trial, Eur. Radiol., 30 (2020), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06409-z doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06409-z
    [77] T.-F. Zhang, Z. Fu, Y. Wang, W.-Y. Shi, G.-B. Chen, d J. Fei, Lesion positioning method of a ct-guided surgical robotic system for minimally invasive percutaneous lung, Int. J. Med. Robot., 16 (2020), e2044. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2044 doi: 10.1002/rcs.2044
    [78] L. Wei, S. Jiang, Z. Yang, G. Zhang, L. Ma, A ct-guided robotic needle puncture method for lung tumours with respiratory motion, Phys. Med., 73 (2020), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.003
    [79] K. Y. Fong, A. S. M. Tan, M. S. B. Sulaiman, S. H. Leong, K. W. Ng, C. W. Too, Phantom and animal study of a robot-assisted, ct-guided targeting system using image-only navigation for stereotactic needle insertion without positional sensors, J. Vasc. Int. Radiol., 33 (2022), 1416–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2022.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.08.005
    [80] B. Guiu, T. De Baère, G. Noel, M. Ronot, Feasibility, safety and accuracy of a ct-guided robotic assistance for percutaneous needle placement in a swine liver model, Sci. Rep., 11 (2021), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84878-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84878-3
    [81] T. de Baère, C. Roux, F. Deschamps, L. Tselikas, B. Guiu, Evaluation of a new ct-guided robotic system for percutaneous needle insertion for thermal ablation of liver tumors: A prospective pilot study, Cardiov. Int. Radiol., 45 (2022), 1701–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03267-z doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03267-z
    [82] W. J. Heerink, S. J. Ruiter, J. P. Pennings, B. Lansdorp, R. Vliegenthart, M. Oudkerk, et al., Robotic versus freehand needle positioning in ct-guided ablation of liver tumors: a randomized controlled trial, Radiology, 290 (2019), 826–832. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181698 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181698
    [83] T. Hiraki, T. Matsuno, T. Kamegawa, T. Komaki, J. Sakurai, R. Matsuura, et al., Robotic insertion of various ablation needles under computed tomography guidance: Accuracy in animal experiments, Eur. J. Radiol., 105 (2018), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.006
    [84] I. Burovik, G. Prohorov, P. Lushina, A. Vasiliev, E. Degtiareva, Ct-guided robotic-assisted percutaneous interventions: first experience, Med. Visualiz., 27–35. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-2-27-35
    [85] R. Kumar, B. R. Mittal, A. Bhattacharya, H. Singh, A. Bal, S. K. Vadi, et al., Diagnostic performance of real-time robotic arm-assisted 18f-fdg pet/ct-guided percutaneous biopsy in metabolically active abdominal and pelvic lesions, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging., 46 (2019), 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4133-x doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4133-x
    [86] L. Deboeuf, A. Moiraghi, C. Debacker, S. M. Peeters, G. A. Simboli, A. Roux, et al., Feasibility and accuracy of robot-assisted, stereotactic biopsy using 3-dimensional intraoperative imaging and frameless registration tool, Neurosurgery, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002294 doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002294
    [87] H. Qiao, S. Zhong, Z. Chen, H. Wang, Improving performance of robots using human-inspired approaches: a survey, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 65 (2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3606-1 doi: 10.1007/s11432-022-3606-1
    [88] E. Checcucci, D. Amparore, G. Volpi, F. Piramide, S. De Cillis, A. Piana, et al., Percutaneous puncture during pcnl: New perspective for the future with virtual imaging guidance, World J. Urol., 40 (2022), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03820-4 doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03820-4
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Lequn Chen, Xiling Yao, Peng Xu, Seung Ki Moon, Guijun Bi, Rapid surface defect identification for additive manufacturing with in-situ point cloud processing and machine learning, 2021, 16, 1745-2759, 50, 10.1080/17452759.2020.1832695
    2. Pin-Chuan Chen, Ching Chan Chou, Chung Hsuan Chiang, Systematically Studying Dissolution Process of 3D Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Mold for Creation of Complex and Fully Transparent Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Fluidic Devices, 2021, 1976-0280, 10.1007/s13206-021-00009-0
    3. Yanzhou Fu, Austin Downey, Lang Yuan, Avery Pratt, Yunusa Balogun, In situ monitoring for fused filament fabrication process: A review, 2021, 38, 22148604, 101749, 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101749
    4. Jingchao Jiang, Yongsheng Ma, Path Planning Strategies to Optimize Accuracy, Quality, Build Time and Material Use in Additive Manufacturing: A Review, 2020, 11, 2072-666X, 633, 10.3390/mi11070633
    5. George Papazetis, George-Christopher Vosniakos, Improving deposition quality at higher rates in material extrusion additive manufacturing, 2020, 111, 0268-3768, 1221, 10.1007/s00170-020-06182-0
    6. Jingchao Jiang, Yun-Fei Fu, A short survey of sustainable material extrusion additive manufacturing, 2020, 1448-4846, 1, 10.1080/14484846.2020.1825045
    7. Jingchao Jiang, Stephen T. Newman, Ray Y. Zhong, A review of multiple degrees of freedom for additive manufacturing machines, 2021, 34, 0951-192X, 195, 10.1080/0951192X.2020.1858510
    8. JC Jiang, Xinghua Xu, Wanzhi Rui, Zhengrong Jia, Zuowei Ping, O.P. Malik, Line Width Mathematical Model in Fused Deposition Modelling for Precision Manufacturing, 2021, 231, 2267-1242, 03003, 10.1051/e3sconf/202123103003
    9. A. Equbal, S. Akhter, Md. A. Equbal, A. K. Sood, 2021, Chapter 23, 978-3-030-68023-7, 445, 10.1007/978-3-030-68024-4_23
    10. Huiying He, Jun Lu, Yi Zhang, Jing Han, Zhuang Zhao, Quantitative prediction of additive manufacturing deposited layer offset based on passive visual imaging and deep residual network, 2021, 72, 15266125, 195, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.049
    11. Yuhang Yang, Varun A. Kelkar, Hemangg S. Rajput, Adriana C. Salazar Coariti, Kimani C. Toussaint, Chenhui Shao, Machine-learning-enabled geometric compliance improvement in two-photon lithography without hardware modifications, 2022, 76, 15266125, 841, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.046
    12. Tariku Sinshaw Tamir, Gang Xiong, Qihang Fang, Xisong Dong, Zhen Shen, Fei-Yue Wang, A feedback-based print quality improving strategy for FDM 3D printing: an optimal design approach, 2022, 120, 0268-3768, 2777, 10.1007/s00170-021-08332-4
    13. Sandeep Suresh Babu, Abdel-Hamid I. Mourad, Khalifa H. Harib, 2022, Unauthorized usage and cybersecurity risks in additively manufactured composites: Toolpath reconstruction using imaging and machine learning techniques, 978-1-6654-1801-0, 1, 10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734313
    14. Xiaoyu Li, Mengna Zhang, Mingxia Zhou, Jing Wang, Weixin Zhu, Chuan Wu, Xiao Zhang, Qualify assessment for extrusion-based additive manufacturing with 3D scan and machine learning, 2023, 90, 15266125, 274, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.025
    15. Kyudong Kim, Heena Noh, Kijung Park, Hyun Woo Jeon, Sunghoon Lim, Characterization of power demand and energy consumption for fused filament fabrication using CFR-PEEK, 2022, 28, 1355-2546, 1394, 10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0188
    16. Nectarios Vidakis, Markos Petousis, Nikolaos Mountakis, Emmanuel Maravelakis, Stefanos Zaoutsos, John D. Kechagias, Mechanical response assessment of antibacterial PA12/TiO2 3D printed parts: parameters optimization through artificial neural networks modeling, 2022, 121, 0268-3768, 785, 10.1007/s00170-022-09376-w
    17. Jingjing Yan, Zhiling Yuan, Qiang Liu, Guoliang Liu, Lei Li, Printing Ready Topology Optimization for Material Extrusion Polymer Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 2329-7662, 10.1089/3dp.2021.0189
    18. Zhuo Wang, Wenhua Yang, Qingyang Liu, Yingjie Zhao, Pengwei Liu, Dazhong Wu, Mihaela Banu, Lei Chen, Data-driven modeling of process, structure and property in additive manufacturing: A review and future directions, 2022, 77, 15266125, 13, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.053
    19. Dongxiao Wang, Haolei Wang, Yuqing Wang, 2021, Continuity Path Planning for 3D Printed Lightweight Infill Structures, 978-1-6654-2498-1, 959, 10.1109/TOCS53301.2021.9688877
    20. Jingchao Jiang, A survey of machine learning in additive manufacturing technologies, 2023, 0951-192X, 1, 10.1080/0951192X.2023.2177740
    21. Di Wu, Wanying Zhang, Heming Jia, Xin Leng, Simultaneous Feature Selection and Support Vector Machine Optimization Using an Enhanced Chimp Optimization Algorithm, 2021, 14, 1999-4893, 282, 10.3390/a14100282
    22. Sandeep Suresh Babu, Abdel-Hamid I. Mourad, Khalifa H. Harib, Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman, Recent developments in the application of machine-learning towards accelerated predictive multiscale design and additive manufacturing, 2023, 18, 1745-2759, 10.1080/17452759.2022.2141653
    23. Jingchang Li, Xiaoge Zhang, Qi Zhou, Felix T.S. Chan, Zhen Hu, A feature-level multi-sensor fusion approach for in-situ quality monitoring of selective laser melting, 2022, 84, 15266125, 913, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.050
    24. Ying Zhang, Mutahar Safdar, Jiarui Xie, Jinghao Li, Manuel Sage, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, A systematic review on data of additive manufacturing for machine learning applications: the data quality, type, preprocessing, and management, 2022, 0956-5515, 10.1007/s10845-022-02017-9
    25. Chenxi Tian, Tianjiao Li, Jenniffer Bustillos, Shonak Bhattacharya, Talia Turnham, Jingjie Yeo, Atieh Moridi, Data‐Driven Approaches Toward Smarter Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 3, 2640-4567, 2100014, 10.1002/aisy.202100014
    26. Tariku Sinshaw Tamir, Gang Xiong, Qihang Fang, Yong Yang, Zhen Shen, MengChu Zhou, Jingchao Jiang, Machine-learning-based monitoring and optimization of processing parameters in 3D printing, 2022, 0951-192X, 1, 10.1080/0951192X.2022.2145019
    27. Jian Qin, Fu Hu, Ying Liu, Paul Witherell, Charlie C.L. Wang, David W. Rosen, Timothy W. Simpson, Yan Lu, Qian Tang, Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing, 2022, 52, 22148604, 102691, 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691
    28. Reem Ashima, Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid, Shanay Rab, Understanding the role and capabilities of Internet of Things-enabled Additive Manufacturing through its application areas, 2022, 5, 25425048, 137, 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.12.001
    29. Nectarios Vidakis, Constantine David, Markos Petousis, Dimitrios Sagris, Nikolaos Mountakis, Amalia Moutsopoulou, The effect of six key process control parameters on the surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and porosity in material extrusion 3D printing of polylactic acid: Prediction models and optimization supported by robust design analysis, 2022, 5, 26669129, 100104, 10.1016/j.aime.2022.100104
    30. William Jordan Wright, Joshua Darville, Nurcin Celik, Hilmar Koerner, Emrah Celik, In-situ optimization of thermoset composite additive manufacturing via deep learning and computer vision, 2022, 58, 22148604, 102985, 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102985
    31. Rita Drissi-Daoudi, Vigneashwara Pandiyan, Roland Logé, Sergey Shevchik, Giulio Masinelli, Hossein Ghasemi-Tabasi, Annapaola Parrilli, Kilian Wasmer, Differentiation of materials and laser powder bed fusion processing regimes from airborne acoustic emission combined with machine learning, 2022, 17, 1745-2759, 181, 10.1080/17452759.2022.2028380
    32. 2021, 10.54718/NEAF9531
    33. Keshav Lalit Ameta, Vijendra Singh Solanki, Vineeta Singh, Ahanthem Priyanca Devi, R.S. Chundawat, Shafiul Haque, Critical appraisal and systematic review of 3D & 4D printing in sustainable and environment-friendly smart manufacturing technologies, 2022, 34, 22149937, e00481, 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00481
    34. Xiao-Yu Li, Fu-Long Liu, Meng-Na Zhang, Ming-Xia Zhou, Chuan Wu, Xiao Zhang, Pawel Malinowski, A Combination of Vision- and Sensor-Based Defect Classifications in Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing, 2023, 2023, 1687-7268, 1, 10.1155/2023/1441936
    35. Victor Beloshenko, Yan Beygelzimer, Vyacheslav Chishko, Bogdan Savchenko, Nadiya Sova, Dmytro Verbylo, Iurii Vozniak, Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Based Three-Dimensional-Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Build Orientation, Loading Direction, and Filler, 2021, 2329-7662, 10.1089/3dp.2021.0031
    36. Thang Q. Tran, Feng Lin Ng, Justin Tan Yu Kai, Stefanie Feih, Mui Ling Sharon Nai, Tensile Strength Enhancement of Fused Filament Fabrication Printed Parts: A Review of Process Improvement Approaches and Respective Impact, 2022, 54, 22148604, 102724, 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102724
    37. Zifan Geng, Peipei Wu, Hao Pan, Qi Zheng, Wenqiang Zuo, Wenhua Zhang, Wei She, Robust layer interface in cement additive manufacturing via silicate penetration and precipitation, 2022, 214, 02641275, 110380, 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110380
    38. Yaozhong Wu, Jianguang Fang, Chi Wu, Cunyi Li, Guangyong Sun, Qing Li, Additively manufactured materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review on their mechanical characteristics and energy absorption, 2023, 246, 00207403, 108102, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108102
    39. Mutahar Safdar, Guy Lamouche, Padma Polash Paul, Gentry Wood, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, 2023, Chapter 3, 978-3-031-32153-5, 45, 10.1007/978-3-031-32154-2_3
    40. Mandar Golvaskar, Sammy A. Ojo, Manigandan Kannan, Recent Advancements in Material Waste Recycling: Conventional, Direct Conversion, and Additive Manufacturing Techniques, 2024, 9, 2313-4321, 43, 10.3390/recycling9030043
    41. Yingxin Ma, Yuan Yao, Jinxiu Yang, Hang Zhang, Beishui Liao, Global Continuous Toolpath Planning with Controllable Local Directions, 2023, 164, 00104485, 103593, 10.1016/j.cad.2023.103593
    42. B. K. Sivaraj, R. Nitheesh Kumar, V. Karthik, 2024, 9781394197910, 49, 10.1002/9781394198085.ch3
    43. Ziadia Abdelhamid, Habibi Mohamed, Sousso Kelouwani, The use of machine learning in process–structure–property modeling for material extrusion additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review, 2024, 46, 1678-5878, 10.1007/s40430-023-04637-5
    44. Baris Ördek, Yuri Borgianni, Eric Coatanea, Machine learning-supported manufacturing: a review and directions for future research, 2024, 12, 2169-3277, 10.1080/21693277.2024.2326526
    45. Md. Asif Equbal, Azhar Equbal, Zahid A. Khan, Irfan Anjum Badruddin, Machine learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive insight, 2024, 25888404, 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.10.002
    46. Jiarui Xie, Chonghui Zhang, Manuel Sage, Mutahar Safdar, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, A sequential cross-product knowledge accumulation, extraction and transfer framework for machine learning-based production process modelling, 2024, 62, 0020-7543, 4181, 10.1080/00207543.2023.2254854
    47. Nandita Dasgupta, Vineeta Singh, Shivendu Ranjan, Taijshee Mishra, Bhartendu Nath Mishra, 2024, 9780128203019, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-12-820301-9.00002-1
    48. Avinash Selot, R. K. Dwivedi, Machine learning and sensor-based approach for defect detection in MEX additive manufacturing process- A Review, 2023, 45, 1678-5878, 10.1007/s40430-023-04425-1
    49. Beyza Gavcar, 2024, Chapter 8, 978-3-031-70934-0, 101, 10.1007/978-3-031-70935-7_8
    50. Izabela Rojek, Dariusz Mikołajewski, Marcin Kempiński, Krzysztof Galas, Adrianna Piszcz, Emerging Applications of Machine Learning in 3D Printing, 2025, 15, 2076-3417, 1781, 10.3390/app15041781
    51. Onuchukwu Godwin Chike, Yee Jian Chin, Norhayati Ahmad, Wan Fahmin Faiz Wan Ali, Impact of Machine/Deep Learning on Additive Manufacturing: Publication Trends, Bibliometric Analysis, and Literature Review (2013–2022), 2025, 6, 2662-2556, 10.1007/s43069-025-00440-1
    52. Swapnil Deokar, Narendra Kumar, Ravi Pratap Singh, A comprehensive review on smart manufacturing using machine learning applicable to fused deposition modeling, 2025, 25901230, 104941, 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104941
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3930) PDF downloads(372) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog