Research article Special Issues

Bifurcations of a prey-predator system with fear, refuge and additional food

  • Received: 26 October 2022 Revised: 07 November 2022 Accepted: 16 November 2022 Published: 09 December 2022
  • In the predator-prey system, predators can affect the prey population by direct killing and inducing predation fear, which ultimately force preys to adopt some anti-predator strategies. Therefore, it proposes a predator-prey model with anti-predation sensitivity induced by fear and Holling-Ⅱ functional response in the present paper. Through investigating the system dynamics of the model, we are interested in finding how the refuge and additional food supplement impact the system stability. With the changes of the anti-predation sensitivity (the refuge and additional food), the main result shows that the stability of the system will change accordingly, and it has accompanied with periodic fluctuations. Intuitively the bubble, bistability phenomena and bifurcations are found through numerical simulations. The bifurcation thresholds of crucial parameters are also established by the Matcont software. Finally, we analyze the positive and negative impacts of these control strategies on the system stability and give some suggestions to the maintaining of ecological balance, we perform extensive numerical simulations to illustrate our analytical findings.

    Citation: Jinxing Zhao, Yuanfu Shao. Bifurcations of a prey-predator system with fear, refuge and additional food[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3700-3720. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023173

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xu Guo . Annual Report 2021. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(1): 103-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022009
    [2] Xu Guo . Annual Report 2023. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 62-67. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024004
    [3] Nathan L'Etoile, Lindsay Brim, Susan Coffin, Ericka Hayes . Report of an outbreak of enterovirus disease in a neonatal intensive care unit and a systematic review of the literature. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 167-181. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025009
    [4] Dolanchampa Modak, Silpak Biswas, Agnibho Mondal, Malabika Biswas, Maria Teresa Mascellino, Banya Chakraborty, Simmi Tiwari, Ajit Dadaji Shewale, Tushar Nale, Rupali Dey . Seroprevalence of brucellosis among animal handlers in West Bengal, India: an occupational health study. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024001
    [5] María José Lorenzo Pisarello, Antonela Marquez, Adriana Perez Chaia, Jaime Daniel Babot . Targeting gut health: Probiotics as promising therapeutics in alcohol-related liver disease management. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 410-435. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025019
    [6] Alexey V. Rakov, Natalya A. Kuznetsova, Anatoly A. Yakovlev . Genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis in the Siberia and Far East of Russia based on plasmid profiles. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(2): 106-120. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020007
    [7] Taish Ramkisson, Diane Rip . Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales from agricultural, environmental and clinical origins: South Africa in a global context. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(4): 668-691. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023034
    [8] Divakar Dahiya, Caoimhin Mackin, Poonam Singh Nigam . Studies on bioactivities of Manuka and regional varieties of honey for their potential use as natural antibiotic agents for infection control related to wound healing and in pharmaceutical formulations. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(2): 288-310. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024015
    [9] Matthew Johnston, Michael McBride, Divakar Dahiya, Richard Owusu-Apenten, Poonam Singh Nigam . Antibacterial activity of Manuka honey and its components: An overview. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 655-664. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.655
    [10] Masashi Uema, Kenzo Yonemitsu, Yoshimasa Sasaki, Hiroshi Asakura . Detection of hepatitis E virus RNA from pig bile collected at a slaughterhouse in Japan. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 566-574. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022036
  • In the predator-prey system, predators can affect the prey population by direct killing and inducing predation fear, which ultimately force preys to adopt some anti-predator strategies. Therefore, it proposes a predator-prey model with anti-predation sensitivity induced by fear and Holling-Ⅱ functional response in the present paper. Through investigating the system dynamics of the model, we are interested in finding how the refuge and additional food supplement impact the system stability. With the changes of the anti-predation sensitivity (the refuge and additional food), the main result shows that the stability of the system will change accordingly, and it has accompanied with periodic fluctuations. Intuitively the bubble, bistability phenomena and bifurcations are found through numerical simulations. The bifurcation thresholds of crucial parameters are also established by the Matcont software. Finally, we analyze the positive and negative impacts of these control strategies on the system stability and give some suggestions to the maintaining of ecological balance, we perform extensive numerical simulations to illustrate our analytical findings.



    AIMS Microbiology is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers in the field of microbiology. Together with the Editorial Office of AIMS Microbiology, I wish to testify my sincere gratitude to all authors, members of the editorial board and reviewers for their contribution to AIMS Microbiology in 2022.

    In 2022, We received more than 200 manuscripts and 40 of them were accepted and published. These published papers include 23 research articles, 11 review articles, 2 editorials, 2 communications and 1 brief report papers. The authors of the manuscripts are from more than 20 countries. The data shows a significant increase of international collaborations on the research of microbiology.

    An important part of our strategy has been preparation of special issues. 2 special issues published more than five papers. AIMS Microbiology have invited 17 experts to join our Editorial Board in 2022. We will continue to renew Editorial Board in 2022.

    We hope that in 2023, AIMS Microbiology can receive and collect more excellent articles to be able to publish. The journal will dedicate to publishing high quality papers by regular issues as well as special issues organized by the members of the editorial board. We believe that all these efforts will increase the impact and citations of the papers published by AIMS Microbiology.

    On behalf of

    AIMS Microbiology Editorial Board

    The submissions of our AIMS Microbiology journal in 2022 increased. In 2022, AIMS Microbiology published 4 issues, a total of 40 articles were published online, and the category of published articles is as follows:

    Type Number
    Research 23
    Review 11
    Editorial 2
    Communication 2
    Brief report 1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Peer Review Rejection rate: 49%

    Publication time (from submission to online): 75 days

    Organizing high-quality special issue is a very important work in 2022. In 2022, 7 special issues were called. Listed below are some examples of issues that have more than 5 papers. We encourage Editorial Board members to propose more potential topics, and to act as editors of special issues.

    Special issue link Papers
    Biotechnological applications of microorganisms in Industry, Agriculture and Environment https://www.aimspress.com/aimsmicro/article/6262/special-articles 8
    Antimicrobials and Resistance https://www.aimspress.com/aimsmicro/article/6209/special-articles 5

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    AIMS Microbiology has Editorial Board members representing researchers from 20 countries, which are shown below. We are constantly assembling the editorial board to be representative to a variety of disciplines across the field of microbiology. AIMS Microbiology has 81 members now, and 17 of them joined in 2022. We will continue to invite dedicated experts and researchers in order to renew the Editorial Board in 2022.

    Top 5 Cited Papers in last 2 years.

    No. Article Citations
    1 Salmonella spp. quorum sensing: an overview from environmental persistence to host cell invasion 10
    2 Ways to improve biocides for metalworking fluid 9
    3 Yeasts in different types of cheese 7
    4 Exploring endophytes for in vitro synthesis of bioactive compounds similar to metabolites produced in vivo by host plants 7
    5 Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns 6

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the recent two years, our journal has developed much faster than before; Our journal has been indexed in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed databases. We received more than 200 manuscript submissions and published 40 papers in 2022. We have added 17 new Editorial Board members.

    In 2023, we expect to publish more articles to enhance the reputation. We will invite more experts in the field of microbiology to publish a review or research article. To set a goal, we would like to publish 40 high-quality articles in 2023. In 2023, we will continue to update our editorial board. We hope that more experts in the field of microbiology can help us review and guest special issues.



    [1] A. J. Lotka, Elements Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1924. https://doi.org/10.1038/116461b0
    [2] V. Volterra, Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically, Nature, 118 (1926), 558–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/118558a0 doi: 10.1038/118558a0
    [3] P. A. Abrams, The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31 (2000), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79
    [4] P. W. Guiden, S. L. Bartel, N. W. Byer, A. A. Shipley, J. L. Orrock, Predator-prey interactions in the Anthropocene: reconciling multiple aspects of novelty, Trends Ecol. Evol., 34 (2019), 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.017
    [5] J. B. Collings, The effects of the functional response on the bifurcation behavior of a mite predator-prey interaction model, J. Math. Biol., 36 (1997), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850050095 doi: 10.1007/s002850050095
    [6] K. Antwi-Fordjour, D. R. Parshad, A. M. Beauregard, Dynamics of a predator-prey model with generalized functional response and mutual interference, Math. Biosci., 360 (2020), 108407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108407 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108407
    [7] Y. Huang, F. Chen, L. Zhong, Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with holling type Ⅲ response function incorporating a prey refuge, Appl. Math. Comput., 182 (2006), 672–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.030
    [8] J. P. Tripathi, S. Abbas, M. Thakur, Dynamical analysis of a prey-predator model with Beddington- DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge, Nonlinear Dyn., 80 (2015), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1859-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1859-2
    [9] C. Xu, P. Li, Oscillations for a delayed predator-prey modelwith Hassell-Varley-type functional response, Comptes Rendus Biol., 338 (2015), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.01.002
    [10] J. P. Tripathi, S. Tyagi, S. Abbas, Global analysis of a delayed density dependent predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 30 (2016), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.008
    [11] J. H. P. Dawes, M. O. Souza, A derivation of Holling's type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ functional responses in predator-prey systems, J. Theor. Biol., 327 (2017), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.017
    [12] Y. Shao, Global stability of a delayed predator-prey system with fear and Holling-type Ⅱ functional response in deterministic and stochastic environments, Math. Comput. Simul., 200 (2022), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2022.04.013
    [13] S. Pal, N. Pal, S. Samanta, J. Chattopadhyay, Effect of hunting cooperation and fear in a predator-prey model, Ecol. Complex, 39 (2019), 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770
    [14] S. Creel, D. Christianson, S. Liley, J. A. Winnie, Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk, Science, 315 (2007), 960. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135918 doi: 10.1126/science.1135918
    [15] L. Y. Zanette, A. F. White, M. C. Allen, M. Clinchy, Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year, Science, 334 (2011), 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210908 doi: 10.1126/science.1210908
    [16] W. Ripple, R. L. Beschta, Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems?, BioScience, 54 (2004), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:WATEOF]2.0.CO;2 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:WATEOF]2.0.CO;2
    [17] L. Y. Zanette, M. Clinchy, Ecology of fear, Curr. Biol., 29 (2019), 309–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.042 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.042
    [18] S. Eggers, M. Griesser, J. Ekman, Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus), Behav. Ecol., 16 (2005), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh163 doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh163
    [19] F. Hua, K. E. Sieving, R. J. Fletcher, C. A. Wright, Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance, Behav. Ecol., 25 (2014), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru017 doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru017
    [20] P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Kinetics of a diffusive capture process: lamb besieged by a pride of lions, J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 26 (1996), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/29/17/011 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/29/17/011
    [21] V. Kumar, N. Kumari, Controlling chaos in three species food chain model with fear effect, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 828–842. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020056 doi: 10.3934/math.2020056
    [22] V. Kumar, N. Kumari, Stability and bifurcation analysis of Hassell-Varley Prey-Predator system with fear effect, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 6 (2020), 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-020-00899-y doi: 10.1007/s40819-020-00899-y
    [23] B. Nath, N. Kumari, V. Kumar, K. P. Das, Refugia and allee effect in prey species stabilize chaos in a Tri-Trophic food chain model, Differ. Equations Dyn. Syst., 30 (2022), 631–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-019-00457-z doi: 10.1007/s12591-019-00457-z
    [24] P. Panday, N. Pal, S. Samanta, P. Tryjanowski, J. Chattopadhyay, Dynamics of a stage-structured predator-prey model: cost and benefit of fear-induced group defense, J. Theor. Biol., 528 (2021), 110846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110846 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110846
    [25] D. T. Blumstein, The Nature of Fear: Survival Lessons from the Wild, Harvard University Press, 2020.
    [26] S. Mondal, G. P. Samanta, Dynamics of an additional food provided predator-prey system with prey refuge dependent on both species and constant harvest in predator, Phys. A., 534 (2019), 122301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122301 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122301
    [27] S. Saha, A. Maiti, G. P. Samanta, A michaelis-menten predator-prey model with strong allee effect and disease in prey incorporating prey refuge, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos., 28 (2018), 1850073. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127418500736 doi: 10.1142/S0218127418500736
    [28] S. Saha, G. P. Samanta, Analysis of a predator-prey model with herd behaviour and disease in prey incorporating prey refuge, Int. J. Biomath., 12 (2019), 1950007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524519500074 doi: 10.1142/S1793524519500074
    [29] M. Das, A. Maity, G. P. Samanta, Stability analysis of a prey-predator fractional order model incorporating prey refuge, Ecol. Genet. Genomics., 7–8 (2018), 33–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egg.2018.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.egg.2018.05.001
    [30] H. Li, L. Zhang, C. Hu, Y. L. Jiang, Z. Teng, Dynamical analysis of a fractional-order predator–prey model incorporating a prey refuge, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 54 (2017), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-016-1017-8 doi: 10.1007/s12190-016-1017-8
    [31] T. K. Kar, Stability analysis of a predator-prey model incorporating a prey refuge, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10 (2006), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2003.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2003.08.006
    [32] Y. X. Xia, S. L. Yuan, Survival analysis of a stochastic predator-prey model with prey refuge and fear effect, J. BBiol. Dynam., 14 (2020), 871–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2020.1853832 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1853832
    [33] S. Mondal, A. Maiti, G. P. Samanta, Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator-prey model, Biophys. Rev. Lett., 13 (2018), 157177. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793048018500091 doi: 10.1142/S1793048018500091
    [34] Moorland Working Group, Diversionary feeding of hen harriers on grouse moors a practical guide Report, Scottish Natural heritage, Inverness, 1999.
    [35] M. J. Crawley, Plant Ecology, Wiley, New York, 1997.
    [36] A. Das, G. P. Samanta, Modeling the fear effect on a stochastic prey-predator system with additional food for the predator, J. Phys. A Math. Theor., 51 (2018), 465601. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aae4c6 doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aae4c6
    [37] G. R. Huxel, K. McCann, G. A. Polis, Effects of partitioning allochthonous and autochthonous resources on food web stability, Ecol. Res., 17 (2002), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00501.x doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00501.x
    [38] P. D. N. Srinivasu, B. S. R. V. Prasad, Role of quantity of additional food to predators as a control in predator-prey systems with relevance to pest management and biological conservation, Bull. Math. Biol., 73 (2011), 2249–2276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9601-9 doi: 10.1007/s11538-010-9601-9
    [39] L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer, 1996.
    [40] V. B. Kolmanovskii, A. D. Myshkis, Applied Theory of Functional Differential Equations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1992.
    [41] A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts, Y. A. Kuznetsov, H. G. E. Meijer, B. Sautois, New features of the software matcont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2008), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873950701742754 doi: 10.1080/13873950701742754
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2387) PDF downloads(165) Cited by(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog