Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Free vibration of summation resonance of suspended-cable-stayed beam

  • Free vibration of summation resonance of suspended-cable-stayed beam is investigated in the article. A 3-DOF model of the coupled structure is built, with the main cable and sling (vertical cable) considered to be geometrically nonlinear, and the beam is taken as linear Euler beam. Hamilton's principle is used to derive the dynamic equilibrium equations of the coupled structure. Then, the dynamic equilibrium equations are solved by means of multiple scales method, the second order approximation solutions of single-modal motion of the coupled structure are obtained. Numerical examples are presented to discuss time history of free vibration of the summation resonance, with and without damping. Additionally, fourth-order Runge-Kutta method is directly used for the dynamic equilibrium equations to complement and verify the analytical solutions. The results show that the coupled structure performs strongly nonlinear and coupled characteristics, which is useful for engineering design.

    Citation: Chunguang Dong, Zhuojie Zhang, Xiaoxia Zhen, Mu Chen. Free vibration of summation resonance of suspended-cable-stayed beam[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7230-7249. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019363

    Related Papers:

    [1] Md Nazmul Hassan, Angela Peace . Mechanistically derived Toxicant-mediated predator-prey model under Stoichiometric constraints. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(1): 349-365. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020019
    [2] Yawen Yan, Hongyue Wang, Xiaoyuan Chang, Jimin Zhang . Asymmetrical resource competition in aquatic producers: Constant cell quota versus variable cell quota. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3983-4005. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023186
    [3] Huanyi Liu, Hengguo Yu, Chuanjun Dai, Zengling Ma, Qi Wang, Min Zhao . Dynamical analysis of an aquatic amensalism model with non-selective harvesting and Allee effect. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8857-8882. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021437
    [4] Moitri Sen, Malay Banerjee, Yasuhiro Takeuchi . Influence of Allee effect in prey populations on the dynamics of two-prey-one-predator model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(4): 883-904. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018040
    [5] Zhenliang Zhu, Yuming Chen, Zhong Li, Fengde Chen . Dynamic behaviors of a Leslie-Gower model with strong Allee effect and fear effect in prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10977-10999. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023486
    [6] Lina Hao, Meng Fan, Xin Wang . Effects of nutrient enrichment on coevolution of a stoichiometric producer-grazer system. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(4): 841-875. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.841
    [7] Yueping Dong, Jianlu Ren, Qihua Huang . Dynamics of a toxin-mediated aquatic population model with delayed toxic responses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5907-5924. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020315
    [8] Md Nazmul Hassan, Kelsey Thompson, Gregory Mayer, Angela Peace . Effect of Excess Food Nutrient on Producer-Grazer Model under Stoichiometric and Toxicological Constraints. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(1): 150-167. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019008
    [9] Santanu Bhattacharya, Nandadulal Bairagi . Dynamic optimization of fishing tax and tourism fees for sustainable bioeconomic resource management. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1751-1789. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025064
    [10] Shuangte Wang, Hengguo Yu . Stability and bifurcation analysis of the Bazykin's predator-prey ecosystem with Holling type Ⅱ functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7877-7918. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021391
  • Free vibration of summation resonance of suspended-cable-stayed beam is investigated in the article. A 3-DOF model of the coupled structure is built, with the main cable and sling (vertical cable) considered to be geometrically nonlinear, and the beam is taken as linear Euler beam. Hamilton's principle is used to derive the dynamic equilibrium equations of the coupled structure. Then, the dynamic equilibrium equations are solved by means of multiple scales method, the second order approximation solutions of single-modal motion of the coupled structure are obtained. Numerical examples are presented to discuss time history of free vibration of the summation resonance, with and without damping. Additionally, fourth-order Runge-Kutta method is directly used for the dynamic equilibrium equations to complement and verify the analytical solutions. The results show that the coupled structure performs strongly nonlinear and coupled characteristics, which is useful for engineering design.


    A chemostat is a special type of biological continuous stirred tank reactor in which microorganisms (Phytoplankton, Yeasts...) are placed in the presence of a limiting nutrient and other elements in non-limiting quantity. We can thus, from the variations of the limiting nutrient, know the influence of the latter on the cultivated population. The chemostat is therefore a model of a controlled ecosystem in which we can quantify precisely the relationships between a nutrient and an organism [1]. In ecology, it refers to an artificial lake for bacterial continuous culture where we can analyse inter-specific interactions between bacteria. A huge number of mathematical studies were published (see, for example, the recent monograph by Smith and Waltman [1] and the references therein). The most used mathematical system modelling the bacterial competition for a single obligate limiting substrate predicts the competitive exclusion principle [2,3,4], that at least one competitor bacteria loses the competition [1]. Hsu et al. [5] are among the first, in 1977, to study the problem of competition in the chemostat. They consider n populations in competition for the same nutrient, and show that the competitive exclusion is verified: that of the competitors who uses the better the substrate in small quantity survives, the others are extinguished. In the case of nonmonotonic growth functions, Butler and Wolkowicz [6] show in 1985 that the competitive exclusion principle is also verified. In 1992, Wolkowicz and Lu [7] use Lyapunov functions to show that, again in the case of general shape-growth functions, but with different mortality rates. For each species, the competitive exclusion principle is further checked (the resulting equilibrium being globally stable). Li [8] has recently extended this result to an even wider class of growth functions. Finally, Smith and Waltman [9] verify in 1994 this principle for the model of Droop. This theoretical result was confirmed by Hansen and Hubbell, experimentally [10].

    In many cases, the competing bacteria can produce a plethora of secondary metabolites to increase their competitiveness against other bacteria. For example, the production of Nisin by a number of strains of Lactococcus lactis to exert a high antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria has been widely studied [11,12]. This inter-specific interaction is classified as an inhibition relationship. In the same time, viruses are the most abundant and diverse form of life on Earth. They can infect all types of organisms (Vertebrates, Invertebrates, Plants, Fungi, Bacteria, Archaea). Viruses that infect bacteria are called bacteriophages or phages.

    In this work, we extend the chemostat model [1] to general growth rates taking into account the reversible inhibition between species (mutual inhibition, i.e., each species impedes the growth of the other.) as in [2,13,14,15,16,17] but in presence of a virus associated to the first species. As our study is qualitative, we suppose that the two species are feeding on a nonreproducing limiting substrate that is essential for both species. We suppose also that the chemostat is well-mixed so that environmental conditions are homogenous. We proved that with general nonlinear response functions, the mutual inhibitory relationship in presence of two species confirms the competitive exclusion principle. It is proved that at least one species goes extinct and that for some cases where we have more than one locally stable equilibrium point, the initial species concentrations are important in determining which is the winning species (see Figure 6).

    The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we proposed a mathematical model describing two species competing for a limiting substrate with reversible inhibition in presence of a virus associated to the first species and we recall some useful results of the chemostat theory. In Section 3, the main results of the local stability analysis are presented. Finally, in Section 4, some numerical examples were presented for illustrating the obtained results confirming the competitive exclusion principle.

    Consider a mathematical system of ordinary differential equations describing two species (x1 and x2) competing for a limiting substrate (s) with reversible inhibition in presence of a virus (v) associated to the species x1. We ignore all species-specific death rates and only consider the dilution rate.

    {˙s=D(sins)f1(s,x2)x1f2(s,x1)x2,˙x1=f1(s,x2)x1Dx1αvx1,˙x2=f2(s,x1)x2Dx2,˙v=καvx1Dv. (2.1)

    Here sin is the input concentration of substrate into the chemostat. D is the dilution rate and α is the rate of infection and κ is the production yield of the virus.

    Figure 1.  A chemostat is a bioreactor to which a limiting substrate (sin) is continuously added, while culture liquid (s,x1,x2,v) are continuously removed at the same flow rate (D) [2,18].

    We can see from fourth equation of (2.1) that the condition sin>Dκα must be fulfilled in order to permits the existence of equilibrium points where the species 1 can survive with the virus.

    s(t) is the concentration of substrate in the chemostat at time t. xi(t) is the ith species concentration in the chemostat at time t. v(t) is the virus concentration in the chemostat at time t. fi(s,xj): is the species growth rate depending on substrate and the concentration of the other species.

    For each species, the response function fi:R2+R+,i=1,2 is of class C1, and satisfies

    A1 f1(0,x2)=0 and f2(0,x1)=0,x1,x2R+

    A2 f1s(s,x2)>0,(s,x2)R2+ f2s(s,x1)>0,(s,x1)R2+.

    A3 f1x2(s,x2)<κα<0,(s,x2)R2+, f2x1(s,x1)<0,(s,x1)R2+.

    Hypothesis A1 expresses that the substrate is essential for the bacteria growth; hypothesis A2 reflects that the growth rate increases with substrate. Hypothesis A3 means that species inhibit each other and that the species 1 is more sensitive to the other species than to the produced virus.

    The system (2.1) plus A1-A3 is not a realistic model for a considered biological system. To be more realistic, we should introduce two other variables describing intermediair proteins. Each protein produced by species xi inhibits the growth of species j where i,j=1,2 and ij. In this case the model will be huge (R6) and then difficult to study.

    In El Hajji [2], the author considers two species feeding on limiting substrate in a chemostat considering a mutual inhibitory relationship between both species. The proposed model is the same as the one we proposed here but with α=0 (no virus associated to the first species). It is proved in [2] that at most one species can survive which confirms the competitive exclusion principle. The author proved also in the case where there is two equilibrium points locally stable, the initial concentrations of species have great importance in determination of which species is the winner.

    Proposition 1. 1. For every initial condition (s(0),x1(0),x2(0),v(0))R4+, the corresponding solution admits positive and bounded components and then is definite for all t0.

    2. Ω={(s,x1,x2,v)R4+/s+x1+x2+vκ=sin} is an invariant set and it is an attractor of all solution of system (2.1).

    Proof. 1. The solution components are positive.

    If s=0 then ˙s=Dsin>0 and if xi=0 then ˙xi=0 for i=1,2. If v=0 then ˙v=0.

    Next we have to prove the boundedness of solutions of (2.1). By adding all equations of system (2.1), one obtains, for T(t)=s(t)+x1(t)+x2(t)+v(t)κsin, a single equation :

    ˙T(t)=˙s(t)+˙x1(t)+˙x2(t)+˙v(t)κ=D(sins(t)x1(t)x2(t)v(t)κ)=DT(t).

    Then T(t)=T(0)eDt which means that

    s(t)+x1(t)+x2(t)+v(t)κ=sin+(s(0)+x1(0)+x2(0)+v(0)κ)sin)eDt. (2.2)

    Since all terms of the sum are positive, then the solution of system (2.1) is bounded.

    2. The second point is simply a direct consequence of equality (2.2)

    In this section, the equilibria are determined and their local stability properties are established. Define the parameters ˉx1, ˉx2, ˉv, ¯¯x1, ¯¯x2, x2 and v as the following:

    ˉx1 the solution of the equation f1(sin¯x1,0)=D.

    ˉx2 the solution of the equation f2(sin¯x2,0)=D.

    ˉv the solution of the equation f1(sinDκαˉv,0)=D+αˉv.

    (¯¯x1,¯¯x2) the solution of the equations f1(sin¯¯x1¯¯x2,¯¯x2)=f2(sin¯¯x1¯¯x2,¯¯x1)=D.

    (x2,v) the solution of the equations f1(sinDκαx2v,x2)=D+αv and f2(sinDκαx2v,Dκα)=D.

    Then the system (2.1) admits F0=(sin,0,0,0),F1=(sin¯x1,¯x1,0,0), F2=(sin¯x2,0,¯x2,0),F3=(sinDκαˉv,Dκα,0,ˉv), F4=(sin¯¯x1¯¯x2,¯¯x1,¯¯x2,0) and F=(sinDκαx2v,Dκα,x2,v) as equilibrium points.

    Let D1=f1(sin,0),D2=f2(sin,0),D3=f1(sinDκα,0),D4=f1(sinˉx2,ˉx2),D5=f2(sinˉx1,ˉx1), D6=f2(sinDκαˉv,Dκα),D7=f1(sinˉvDκα,ˉv). Note that D7<D3<D1,D4<D1 and D5,D6<D2.

    The conditions of existence of the equilibria are stated in the following lemmas.

    Lemma 1. F0 exists allways. F0 is a saddle point if D<max(D1,D2). It is a stable node if D>max(D1,D2).

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 2. The equilibrium point F1 exists if and only if D<D1. If D>max(D3,D5) then F1 is a stable node however if D<D3 or D3<D<D5 then F1 is a saddle point.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 3. The equilibrium point F2 exists if and only if D<D2. If D>D4 then F2 is a stable node however if D<D4 then F2 is a saddle point.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 4. F3 exists if and only if D<D3. If D5<D<D3, then F3 is then locally asymptotically stable. If D<min(D3,D5), then F3 is unstable.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 5. The situation D<min(D4,D5) is impossible.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 6. An equilibrium F4 exists if and only if max(D4,D5)<D<min(D1,D2). If it exists then F1 and F2 exist and satisfy ¯¯x1<ˉx1 and ¯¯x2<ˉx2. F4 is always a saddle point.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    Lemma 7. F exists if and only if max(D6,D7)<D<min(D2,D3). If it exists then it is always unstable.

    Proof. The proof is given in Appendix 5.

    We summarize the lemmas given above in the following theorem.

    Theorem 1. A) If min(D4,D5)<D<max(D4,D5) then

    (i) if D5<D4 then

    1. if D5<D<min(D2,D4,D7) then system (2.1) admits four equilibria F0,F1,F2 and F3. F3 is a stable node however F0,F1 and F2 are saddle points.

    2. if max(D5,D7)<D<min(D3,D4,D6) then system (2.1) admits four equilibria F0,F1,F2 and F3. F3 is a stable node however F0,F1 and F2 are saddle points.

    3. if max(D5,D6,D7)<D<min(D2,D3,D4) then system (2.1) admits five equilibria F0,F1,F2,F3 and F. F3 is a stable node however F0,F1,F2 and F are saddle points.

    4. if max(D3,D5)<D<min(D2,D4) then system (2.1) admits three equilibria F0,F1 and F2. F1 is a stable node however F0 and F2 are saddle points.

    5. if D2<D<min(D3,D4) then system (2.1) admits three equilibria F0,F1 and F3. F3 is a stable node however F0 and F1 are saddle points.

    6. if max(D2,D3)<D<D4 then system (2.1) admits two equilibria F0 and F1. F1 is a stable node however F0 is a saddle point.

    (ii) if D4<D5 then

    1. if D4<D<min(D3,D5) then system (2.1) admits four equilibria F0,F1,F2 and F3. F2 is a stable node however F0,F1 and F3 are saddle points.

    2. if max(D3,D4)<D<min(D1,D5) then system (2.1) admits three equilibria F0,F1 and F2. F2 is a stable node however F0 and F1 are saddle points.

    3. if D1<D<D5 then system (2.1) admits two equilibria F0 and F2. F2 is a stable node however F0 is a saddle point.

    4. if max(D4,D6,D7)<D<min(D3,D5) then system (2.1) admits five equilibria F0,F1,F2,F3 and F. F2 is a stable node however F0,F1,F3 and F are saddle points.

    B) If max(D4,D5)<D<min(D1,D2) then

    (i) if max(D4,D5)<D<min(D3,D6) then system (2.1) admits five equilibria F0,F1,F2,F3 and F4. F2 and F3 are stable nodes however F0,F1 and F4 are saddle points.

    (ii) if max(D3,D4,D5)<D<min(D1,D6) then system (2.1) admits four equilibria F0,F1,F2 and F4. F1 and F2 are stable nodes however F0 and F4 are saddle points.

    (iii) if max(D4,D5,D6)<D<min(D2,D7) then system (2.1) admits five equilibria F0,F1,F2,F3 and F4. F2 and F3 are stable nodes however F0,F1 and F4 are saddle points.

    (iv) if max(D4,D5,D6,D7)<D<min(D2,D3) then system (2.1) admits six equilibria F0,F1,F2,F3,F4 and F. F2 and F3 are stable nodes however F0,F1,F4 and F are saddle points.

    (v) if max(D3,D4,D5,D6)<D<min(D1,D2) then system (2.1) admits four equilibria F0,F1,F2 and F4. F1 is a stable node however F0,F2 and F4 are saddle points.

    C) If min(D1,D2)<D<max(D1,D2) then

    (i) If D1<D<D2 then system (2.1) admits two equilibria F0 and F2. F2 is a stable node however F0 is a saddle point.

    (ii) If D2<D<D1 then

    1. if D2<D<D3 then system (2.1) admits three equilibria F0,F1 and F3. F3 is a stable node however F0 and F1 are saddle points.

    2. if max(D2,D3)<D<D1 then system (2.1) admits two equilibria F0 and F1. F1 is a stable node however F0 is a saddle point.

    D) If max(D1,D2)<D then model (2.1) admits only F0 as equilibrium point. F0 is a stable node.

    In this section, we validated the obtained results by some numerical simulations on a system that uses classical Monod growth rates and takes into account the reversible inhibition between species: f1(s,x2)=s(1+s)(1+x2), and f2(s,x1)=s(2+s)(1+x1) with α=0.1 and κ=1.5. One can readily check that the functional responses satisfy Assumptions A1 to A3.

    In Figure 2, if the dilution rate D=1 satisfying D2=0.9<D10.95<D=1, each solution with initial condition inside the whole domain converges to the equilibrium F0 from where the extinction of the two species (point D of Theorem 1).

    Figure 2.  Behaviour for D=1,sin=18.

    In Figure 3, if D=0.92 which satisfies max(D40.1,D50.14,D60.84,D70.89)<D20.892<D=0.92<D30.942<D10.943, the solution with initial condition (1.5,3,1,2.5) converges to the equilibrium F1. This confirms the point C(ii)-1 of Theorem 1. Only species 1 persists and the competitive exclusion principle is fulfilled.

    Figure 3.  Behaviour for D=0.92,sin=16.56.

    In Figure 4, if D=0.67 which satisfies max(D40.09,D50.05)<D=0.67<min(D30.92,D60.79), the solution with initial condition (1.5,3,1,2.5) converges to the equilibrium F3. This confirms the point B(i) of Theorem 1. The competitive exclusion principle is fulfilled here since that at least one species goes extinct.

    Figure 4.  Behaviour for D=0.67,sin=12.06 and an initial condition (1.5,3,1,2.5).

    In Figure 5, we use the same values as in Figure 4 but with different initial condition (1.5,3,5,5) then the solution converges to the equilibrium F2. Again, this confirms the point B(i) of Theorem 1.

    Figure 5.  Behaviour for D=0.67,sin=12.06 and an initial condition (1.5,3,5,5).

    In the case where we have two equilibrium points which are locally stable (Figure 6), the initial concentrations of species have great importance in determination of which species is the winner. If the initial concentration is inside the attraction domain of the equilibrium point corresponding to the persistence of species 1, then species 2 goes extinct and if the initial concentration is inside the attraction domain of the equilibrium point corresponding to the persistence of species 2, then species 1 goes extinct.

    Figure 6.  Behaviour in the (x1,x2)-plane for D=0.67,sin=12.06. The trajectories filling the whole blue domain are converging to the equilibrium F2 and the trajectories filling the whole red domain are converging to the equilibrium F3.

    The competitive exclusion principle (CEP) has been widely studied in the scientific literature not only from a biological point of view but also from a mathematical modeling point of view. Some experiments were realized by Gause in 1932 on the growth of yeasts and paramecia [19]. It is deduced that the most competitive species consistently wins the competition. In 1960, this principle became quite popular in ecology: in fact, the CEP still valid for many kinds of ecosystems [4]. Hsu et al. [5] are among the first, in 1977, to study the problem of competition in the chemostat. They consider n populations in competition for the same nutrient, and show that the competitive exclusion is verified: that of the competitors who uses the better the substrate in small quantity survives, the others are extinguished. In this paper, we proposed a mathematical model (2.1) describing a reversible inhibition relationship between two competing bacteria for one resource in presence of a virus associated to the first species. We locally analysed the system (2.1). We proved that in a continuous reactor and under nonlinear general functional responses f1 and f2, the competitive exclusion principle is still fulfilled, that at least one species goes extinct. In the situation where we have two equilibrium points which are locally stable, initial species concentrations are important in determining which is the winning species.

    The author would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers whose invaluable comments and suggestions have greatly improved this manuscript.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] K. Takahashi and Y. Konishi, Non-linear vibrations of cables in three dimensions, Part II: out-of-plane vibrations under in-plane sinusoidally time-varying load, J. Sound Vib., 118 (1987), 85–97.
    [2] J. L. Lilien and A. P. Da Costa, Vibration amplitudes caused by parametric excitation of cable stayed structures, J. Sound Vib., 174 (1994), 69–90.
    [3] H. N. Arafat and A. H. Nayfeh, Non-linear responses of suspended cables to primary resonance excitations, J. Sound Vib., 266 (2003), 325–354.
    [4] H. Wang, T. Y. Tao, R. Zhou, et al., Parameter sensitivity study on flutter stability of a long-span triple-tower suspension bridge, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 128 (2014), 12–21.
    [5] T. Grigorjeva and Z. Kamaitis, Numerical analysis of the effects of the bending stiffness of the cable and the mass of structural members on free vibrations of suspension bridges, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 21 (2015), 948–957.
    [6] C. G. Koh and Y. Rong, Dynamic analysis of large displacement cable motion with experimental verification, J. Sound Vib., 272 (2004), 183–206.
    [7] M. H. EI Ouni and N. B. Kahla, Nonlinear dynamic analysis of a cable under first and second order parametric excitations, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 18 (2012), 557–567.
    [8] D. Xue, Y. Liu, J. He, et al., Experimental study and numerical analysis of a composite truss joint, J. Constr Steel Res., 67 (2011), 957–964.
    [9] K. Takahashi, Dynamic stability of cables subjected to an axial periodic load, J. Sound Vib., 144 (1991), 323–330.
    [10] A. P. Da Costa and J. A. C. Martins, Oscillations of bridge stay cables induced by periodic motions of deck and/or towers, J. Eng. Mech., 122 (1996), 613–622.
    [11] H. Chen, D. Zuo, Z. Zhang, et al., Bifurcations and chaotic dynamics in suspended cables under simultaneous parametric and external excitations, Nonlinear Dyn., 62 (2010), 623–646.
    [12] D. Zulli and A. Luongo, Nonlinear energy sink to control vibrations of an internally nonresonant elastic string, Meccanica, 50 (2014), 781–794.
    [13] B. N. Sun and Z. G. Wang, Cable oscillation induced by parametric excitation in cable-stayed bridges, J. Zhejiang Univ-sc A, 4 (2003), 13–20.
    [14] Y. Fujino and P. Warnitchai, An experimental and analytical study of auto parametric resonance in a 3-DOF model of cable-stayed-beam, Nonlinear Dyn., 4 (1993), 111–138.
    [15] Y. Xia and Y. Fujino, Auto-parametric vibration of a cable-stayed-beam structure under random excitation, J. Eng. Mech., 132 (2006), 279–286.
    [16] Y. Xia, Q. X. Wu, Y. L. Xu, et al., Verification of a cable element for cable parametric vibration of one-cable-beam system subject to harmonic excitation and random excitation, Adv. Struct. Eng., 14 (2011), 589–595.
    [17] V. Gattulli and M. Lepidi, Nonlinear interactions in the planar dynamics of cable-stayed beam, Int J. Solids Struct., 40 (2003), 4729–4748.
    [18] V. Gattulli and M. Morandini, A parametric analytical model for non‐linear dynamics in cable-stayed beam, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31 (2002), 1281–1300.
    [19] V. Gattulli and M. Lepidi, One-to-two global-local interaction in a cable-stayed beam observed through analytical, finite element and experimental models, Int. J. Nonlin Mech., 40 ( 2005), 571–588.
    [20] Z. Wang, C. Sun, Y. Zhao, et. al., Modeling and nonlinear modal characteristics of the cable-stayed beam, Eur. J. Mech- A-Solid, 47 (2014), 58–69.
    [21] M. H. Wei, K. Lin, L. Jin, et. al., Nonlinear dynamics of a cable-stayed beam driven by sub-harmonic and principal parametric resonance, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 110 (2016), 78–93.
    [22] Z. W. Wang and T. J. Li, Nonlinear dynamic analysis of parametrically excited space cable-beam structures due to thermal loads, Eng. Struct., 83 (2015), 50–61.
    [23] H. J. Kang, H. P. Zhu, Y. Y. Zhao, et al., In-plane non-linear dynamics of the stay cables, Nonlinear Dyn., 73 (20136), 54–59.
    [24] Y. Y. Zhao and H. J. Kang, In-plane free vibration analysis of cable-arch structure, J. Sound Vib., 312 (2008), 363–379.
    [25] H. J. Kang, Y. Y. Zhao and H. P. Zhu, Out-of-plane free vibration analysis of a cable-arch structure, J. Sound Vib., 332 (2013), 907–921.
    [26] A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillations, John Wiley & Sons, (1979), 71–79.
    [27] J. R. Zhao, Y. G. Tang and L. Q. Liu, Study on the sum type combination resonance responses of a classic Spar platform, Ocean Eng., 27 (2009), 23–30.
    [28] L. Q. Chen, J. W. Zu and J. Wu, Steady-state response of the parametrically excited axially moving string constituted by the Boltzmann superposition principle, Acta Mech., 162 (2003), 143–155.
    [29] Q. X. Wu, L. Liu and B. C. Chen, Theoretical equations of in-plane natural vibration for cables considering bending stiffness, Eng. Mech., 27 (2010), 9–27.
    [30] M. Irvine, Cable Structures, The MIT Series in Structural Mechanics, (1981).
    [31] Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Basic and application of cable and space structures, Maruzen, Japan: JSCE, (1999).
    [32] G. H. Li, H. F. Xiang and Z. Y. Shen, Stability and vibration of bridge structures, China Railway Publishing House, (2010), 132–134.
    [33] N. J. Gimsing and C. T. Georgakis, Cable supported bridges: concept and design. 3th ed, John Wiley & Sons, (2011), 220–225.
    [34] A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillation, John Wiley & Sons, (1979).
    [35] M. Al-Qassab and S. Nair, Wavelet-Galerkin method for the free vibrations of an elastic cable carrying an attached mass, J. Sound Vib., 270 (2004), 191–206.
    [36] S. H. Zhou, G. Q. Song, Z. H. Ren, et al., Nonlinear analysis of a parametrically excited beam with intermediate support by using Multi-dimensional incremental harmonic balance method, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 93 (2016), 207–222.
    [37] P. J. Li, R. H. Wang and N. J. Ma, Analytic algorithm of transverse vibration frequency of cables with intermediate flexible supports, J. South China Univ T., 40 (2012), 7–18.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mira Kattwinkel, Peter Reichert, Johanna Rüegg, Matthias Liess, Nele Schuwirth, Modeling Macroinvertebrate Community Dynamics in Stream Mesocosms Contaminated with a Pesticide, 2016, 50, 0013-936X, 3165, 10.1021/acs.est.5b04068
    2. Paul J Van den Brink, Donald J Baird, Hans JM Baveco, Andreas Focks, The use of traits-based approaches and eco(toxico)logical models to advance the ecological risk assessment framework for chemicals, 2013, 9, 15513777, e47, 10.1002/ieam.1443
    3. Neil J. Rowan, Defining Established and Emerging Microbial Risks in the Aquatic Environment: Current Knowledge, Implications, and Outlooks, 2011, 2011, 1687-918X, 1, 10.1155/2011/462832
    4. Marianne Alunno-Bruscia, Henk W. van der Veer, Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman, The AquaDEB project: Physiological flexibility of aquatic animals analysed with a generic dynamic energy budget model (phase II), 2011, 66, 13851101, 263, 10.1016/j.seares.2011.09.005
    5. D. Bontje, B.W. Kooi, B. van Hattum, Sublethal toxic effects in a generic aquatic ecosystem, 2011, 74, 01476513, 929, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.001
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4181) PDF downloads(361) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(10)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog