Research article

Dunnett-type saddlepoint simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences with correlated paired binary data

  • Published: 09 July 2026
  • MSC : 62F12, 62G10

  • Correlated paired binary data often arise in biomedical studies involving paired organs, where each subject may contribute zero, one, or two positive responses. This paper considers simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences between several comparison groups and a common control. Existing methods, including method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), Wald-type, profile likelihood, score, and Normal-Dunnett procedures, mainly rely on first-order normal or chi-square approximations, whose finite-sample accuracy may be affected by sparse counts, unbalanced designs, strong within-subject dependence, or an increasing number of groups. We propose a Dunnett-type saddlepoint simultaneous confidence interval method under the constant-$R$ model. By using the three-category structure of paired binary responses, the cumulant generating function of the treatment-control contrast vector is derived explicitly and used for saddlepoint calibration of the joint distribution. Simulation studies show that the proposed method improves simultaneous coverage accuracy in sparse and strongly dependent settings, while remaining comparable to existing methods in moderate settings. A retinitis pigmentosa dataset is analyzed to illustrate the proposed procedure.

    Citation: Juanjuan Zhang, Yujuan Luo, Weixian Wang. Dunnett-type saddlepoint simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences with correlated paired binary data[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(7): 20224-20253. doi: 10.3934/math.2026821

    Related Papers:

  • Correlated paired binary data often arise in biomedical studies involving paired organs, where each subject may contribute zero, one, or two positive responses. This paper considers simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences between several comparison groups and a common control. Existing methods, including method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), Wald-type, profile likelihood, score, and Normal-Dunnett procedures, mainly rely on first-order normal or chi-square approximations, whose finite-sample accuracy may be affected by sparse counts, unbalanced designs, strong within-subject dependence, or an increasing number of groups. We propose a Dunnett-type saddlepoint simultaneous confidence interval method under the constant-$R$ model. By using the three-category structure of paired binary responses, the cumulant generating function of the treatment-control contrast vector is derived explicitly and used for saddlepoint calibration of the joint distribution. Simulation studies show that the proposed method improves simultaneous coverage accuracy in sparse and strongly dependent settings, while remaining comparable to existing methods in moderate settings. A retinitis pigmentosa dataset is analyzed to illustrate the proposed procedure.



    加载中


    [1] B. Rosner, Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes, Biometrics, 38 (1982), 105–114.
    [2] G. E. Dallal, Paired Bernoulli trials, Biometrics, 44 (1988), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531913 doi: 10.2307/2531913
    [3] A. Donner, Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjusted chi-square approach, Biometrics, 45 (1989), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531501 doi: 10.2307/2531501
    [4] M. L. Tang, N. S. Tang, B. Rosner, Statistical inference for correlated data in ophthalmologic studies, Stat. Med., 25 (2006), 2771–2783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2425 doi: 10.1002/sim.2425
    [5] N. S. Tang, M. L. Tang, S. F. Qiu, Testing the equality of proportions for correlated otolaryngologic data, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 52 (2008), 3719–3729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.12.017
    [6] C. X. Ma, G. Shan, S. Liu, Homogeneity test for correlated binary data, PLOS One, 10 (2015), e0124337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124337 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124337
    [7] N. S. Tang, S. F. Qiu, M. L. Tang, Y. B. Pei, Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 20 (2011), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280209358135 doi: 10.1177/0962280209358135
    [8] X. Peng, C. Liu, S. Liu, C. X. Ma, Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion ratio based on correlated paired data, J. Biopharm. Stat., 29 (2019), 1137–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2019.1584629 doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1584629
    [9] C. W. Dunnett, A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 50 (1955), 1096–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294
    [10] W. W. Piegorsch, Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response, Biometrics, 47 (1991), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532494 doi: 10.2307/2532494
    [11] Z. Yang, G. L. Tian, X. Liu, C. X. Ma, Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences based on correlated paired data, J. Appl. Stat., 48 (2021), 1442–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2020.1795815 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1795815
    [12] X. Zhang, C. Ma, Testing the homogeneity of differences between two proportions for stratified bilateral and unilateral data across strata, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 4156. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11194156 doi: 10.3390/math11194156
    [13] S. Liang, K. T. Fang, X. W. Huang, Y. Xin, C. X. Ma, Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data, Stat. Papers, 65 (2024), 3499–3543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6 doi: 10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6
    [14] Z. Zhang, C. X. Ma, Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one of proportion ratios of bilateral correlated data, PLOS One, 19 (2024), e0311850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311850 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311850
    [15] S. Hua, C. Ma, Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 33 (2024), 1559–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241267357 doi: 10.1177/09622802241267357
    [16] K. Wang, C. X. Ma, Interval estimation of relative risks for combined unilateral and bilateral correlated data, J. Biopharm. Stat., 35 (2025), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2023.2297789 doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2297789
    [17] H. E. Daniels, Saddlepoint approximations in statistics, Ann. Math. Stat., 25 (1954), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728652 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177728652
    [18] R. Lugannani, S. O. Rice, Saddle point approximation for the distribution of the sum of independent random variables, Adv. Appl. Probab., 12 (1980), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/1426607 doi: 10.2307/1426607
    [19] N. Reid, Saddlepoint methods and statistical inference, Stat. Sci., 3 (1988), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012906 doi: 10.1214/ss/1177012906
    [20] J. L. Jensen, Saddlepoint approximations, Oxford University Press, 1995.
    [21] J. E. Kolassa, Series approximation methods in statistics, Springer, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32227-2
    [22] W. Zhou, J. B. Nielsen, L. G. Fritsche, R. Dey, M. E. Gabrielsen, B. N. Wolford, et al., Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies, Nat. Genet., 50 (2018), 1335–1341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0184-y
    [23] W. Bi, L. Fritsche, B. Mukherjee, M. Kim, S. Lee, A fast and accurate method for genome-wide time-to-event data analysis and its application to UK Biobank, Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 107 (2020), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.003
    [24] P. V. B. Johnsen, Ø. Bakke, T. Bjørnland, A. T. DeWan, M. Langaas, Saddlepoint approximations to score test statistics in logistic regression for analyzing genome-wide association studies, Stat. Med., 42 (2023), 2746–2759. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9746 doi: 10.1002/sim.9746
    [25] H. A. Newer, Saddlepoint approximation $p$-values of weighted log-rank tests based on censored clustered data under block Efron's biased-coin design, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 32 (2023), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802221143498 doi: 10.1177/09622802221143498
    [26] Y. Ma, H. Xu, Y. Li, H. Kim, L. L. Xu, L. Miao, et al., SPAmix: a scalable, accurate, and universal analysis framework for large-scale genetic association studies in admixed populations, Genome Biol., 26 (2025), 356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03827-9 doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03827-9
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(299) PDF downloads(91) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(12)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog