Research article

Finite-field pooling for community state inference: sample complexity bounds at the saturation point

  • Published: 23 June 2026
  • MSC : 05C80, 62H30, 94A15, 94B05

  • We studied the sample complexity of community state inference, in which a $ K $-sparse latent state vector $ {\bf x}\in\mathbb{F}_q^N $ over a known community partition is to be recovered from pooled observations $ {\bf y} = {\bf A}{\bf x} $ over the finite field $ \mathbb{F}_q $. The pooling matrix $ {\bf A} $ has a constant row weight of $ d $, with modeling pools formed as linear combinations of exactly $ d $ members. We derived necessary and sufficient conditions on the number of pooled observations $ M $. Let $ \alpha_t(d) $ denote the probability that a row of $ {\bf A} $ misses a fixed set of size $ t $. The lower bound, obtained from Fano's inequality, is governed by $ \alpha_K(d) $; the upper bound, obtained under maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding, is governed by $ \alpha_{2K}(d) $, thus reflecting the worst-case overlap between two candidate supports of total size $ 2K $. Under the sparse-regime approximation $ \alpha_{2K}(d)\approx e^{-2Kd/N} $, we identified the asymptotic saturation point $ d^{*} = (N/(2K))\ln q $ as the solution of $ \alpha_{2K}(d) = 1/q $, at which the two bounds match to order $ \Theta(K\log_q(N/K)) $ with a multiplicative gap bounded by a constant $ C(q) $ that satisfies $ C(q)\to 2 $ as $ q\to\infty $. The analysis was restricted to the sparse signal regime $ K\to\infty $, $ K/N\to 0 $, $ \log q = o(K) $, and assumes noiseless observations; no practical decoder is proposed.

    Citation: Jin-Taek Seong. Finite-field pooling for community state inference: sample complexity bounds at the saturation point[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(6): 18502-18524. doi: 10.3934/math.2026752

    Related Papers:

  • We studied the sample complexity of community state inference, in which a $ K $-sparse latent state vector $ {\bf x}\in\mathbb{F}_q^N $ over a known community partition is to be recovered from pooled observations $ {\bf y} = {\bf A}{\bf x} $ over the finite field $ \mathbb{F}_q $. The pooling matrix $ {\bf A} $ has a constant row weight of $ d $, with modeling pools formed as linear combinations of exactly $ d $ members. We derived necessary and sufficient conditions on the number of pooled observations $ M $. Let $ \alpha_t(d) $ denote the probability that a row of $ {\bf A} $ misses a fixed set of size $ t $. The lower bound, obtained from Fano's inequality, is governed by $ \alpha_K(d) $; the upper bound, obtained under maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding, is governed by $ \alpha_{2K}(d) $, thus reflecting the worst-case overlap between two candidate supports of total size $ 2K $. Under the sparse-regime approximation $ \alpha_{2K}(d)\approx e^{-2Kd/N} $, we identified the asymptotic saturation point $ d^{*} = (N/(2K))\ln q $ as the solution of $ \alpha_{2K}(d) = 1/q $, at which the two bounds match to order $ \Theta(K\log_q(N/K)) $ with a multiplicative gap bounded by a constant $ C(q) $ that satisfies $ C(q)\to 2 $ as $ q\to\infty $. The analysis was restricted to the sparse signal regime $ K\to\infty $, $ K/N\to 0 $, $ \log q = o(K) $, and assumes noiseless observations; no practical decoder is proposed.



    加载中


    [1] M. Aldridge, O. Johnson, J. Scarlett, Group testing: An information theory perspective, Found. Trends Commun., 15 (2019), 196–392. https://doi.org/10.1561/0100000099 doi: 10.1561/0100000099
    [2] P. Nikolopoulos, S. R. Srinivasavaradhan, T. Guo, C. Fragouli, S. Diggavi, Group testing for overlapping communities, ICC 2021–IEEE International Conference on Communications, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500791
    [3] S. Ahn, W.-N. Chen, A. Özgür, Adaptive group testing on networks with community structure: The stochastic block model, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 69 (2023), 4758–4776, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2023.3247520 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2023.3247520
    [4] S. Fortunato, Community detection in graphs, Physics Reports, 486 (2010), 75–174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
    [5] B. Karrer, M. E. J. Newman, Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks, Phys. Rev. E, 83 (2011), 016107, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016107 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016107
    [6] E. Abbe, Community detection and stochastic block models: recent developments, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 18 (2018), 6446–6531.
    [7] D. L. Donoho, Compressed sensing, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 52 (2006), 1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
    [8] E. J. Candes, J. Romberg, T. Tao, Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 52 (2006), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.862083 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2005.862083
    [9] D.-Z. Du, F. K. Hwang, Combinatorial group testing and its applications, 2 Eds., Singapore: World Scientific, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/4252
    [10] J.-T. Seong, H.-N. Lee, Necessary and sufficient conditions for recovery of sparse signals over finite fields, IEEE Commun. Lett., 17 (2013), 1976–1979. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2013.090313.130753 doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2013.090313.130753
    [11] A. K. Das, S. Vishwanath, On finite-alphabet compressive sensing, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, Canada, 2013, 5890–5894. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638794
    [12] R. Ahlswede, N. Cai, S.-Y. R. Li, R. W. Yeung, Network information flow, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 46 (2000), 1204–1216. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.850663 doi: 10.1109/18.850663
    [13] S.-Y. R. Li, R. W. Yeung, N. Cai, Linear network coding, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 49 (2003), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2002.807285 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2002.807285
    [14] G. K. Atia, V. Saligrama, Boolean compressed sensing and noisy group testing, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 58 (2012), 1880–1901. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2011.2178156 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2011.2178156
    [15] A. Mazumdar, Nonadaptive group testing with random set of defectives, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 62 (2016), 7522–7531. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2016.2613870 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2016.2613870
    [16] T. M. Cover, J. A. Thomas, Elements of information theory, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/047174882X
    [17] M. E. J. Newman, Modularity and community structure in networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103 (2006), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103
    [18] V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, N. J. van Eck, From louvain to leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities, Sci. Rep., 9 (2019), 5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
    [19] Z. X. Zhou, A. A. Amini, Analysis of spectral clustering algorithms for community detection: the general bipartite setting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 20 (2019), 1774–1820.
    [20] H. Qing, J. L. Wang, An improved spectral clustering method for community detection under the degree-corrected stochastic blockmodel, 2010, arXiv: 2011.06374. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.06374
    [21] X. Y. Lu, B. K. Szymanski, A regularized stochastic block model for robust community detection in complex networks, Sci. Rep., 9 (2019), 13247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49580-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49580-5
    [22] V. Cohen-Addad, F. Mallmann-Trenn, D. Saulpic, Community recovery in the degree-heterogeneous stochastic block model, Proceedings of Thirty Fifth Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR, 2022, 1662–1692.
    [23] M.-J. Lai, D. Mckenzie, A compressive sensing approach to community detection with applications, 2018, arXiv: 1708.09477. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.09477
    [24] T. J. Wang, J. B. Tan, W. B. Ding, Y. R. Zhang, F. Yang, J. Song, et al., Intercommunity detection scheme for social internet of things: compressive sensing over graphs approach, IEEE Internet Things, 5 (2018), 4550–4557. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2837048 doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2837048
    [25] P. Nikolopoulos, S. R. Srinivasavaradhan, T. Guo, C. Fragouli, S. N. Diggavi, Community-aware group testing, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 69 (2023), 4361–4383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2023.3250119 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2023.3250119
    [26] R. M. Roth, Introduction to coding theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808968
    [27] D. H. Wiedemann, Solving sparse linear equations over finite fields, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 32 (1986), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1986.1057137 doi: 10.1109/TIT.1986.1057137
    [28] M. C. Davey, D. J. C. MacKay, Low-density parity check codes over ${\rm{GF}}(q)$, IEEE Commun. Lett., 2 (1998), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1109/4234.681360 doi: 10.1109/4234.681360
    [29] D. Declercq, M. Fossorier, Decoding algorithms for nonbinary LDPC codes over GF$(q)$, IEEE T. Commun., 55 (2007), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2007.894088 doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2007.894088
    [30] E. R. Berlekamp, Algebraic coding theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
    [31] J. Stern, A method for finding codewords of small weight, In: Coding theory and applications, Berlin: Springer, 1989,106–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0019850
    [32] E. R. Berlekamp, R. J. McEliece, H. C. A. van Tilborg, On the inherent intractability of certain coding problems, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 24 (1978), 384–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1978.1055873 doi: 10.1109/TIT.1978.1055873
    [33] C. Peters, Information-set decoding for linear codes over $\mathbb{F}_q$, In: Post-quantum cryptography, Berlin: Springer, 2010, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12929-2_7
    [34] D. L. Donoho, A. Maleki, A. Montanari, Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 106 (2009), 18914–18919. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909892106 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909892106
    [35] S. Rangan, Generalized approximate message passing for estimation with random linear mixing, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2011, 2168–2172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2011.6033942
    [36] A. Coja-Oghlan, O. Gebhard, M. Hahn-Klimroth, P. Loick, Optimal group testing, In: Proceedings of Thirty Third Conference on Learning Theory Learning Research, PMLR, 2020, 1374–1388.
    [37] M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Washington: National Bureau of Standards, 1964.
    [38] J. Scarlett, V. Cevher, Phase transitions in group testing, The Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Arlington, Virginia, 2016, 40–53.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(27) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog