Research article Special Issues

Global total domination number: exact and approximate results

  • Published: 28 May 2026
  • MSC : 68R10, 05C69, 05C85

  • A nonempty set $ S \subseteq V $ is a global total dominating set (GTDS) in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ if every vertex in both $ G $ and its complement $ \overline{G} $ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $ S $. The problem of finding a GTDS with the minimum cardinality $ \gamma^g_t(G) $ is $ NP $-hard, whereas no exact or approximation algorithm is known for the problem. We derive several new bounds and exact results for $ \gamma_t^g(G) $, particularly for graphs of diameter $ 2 $ and triangle-free graphs. We propose an integer linear programming (ILP) model, as a natural adaptation of a previous model for the global dominating set problem. We build three heuristic algorithms that we evaluate against optimal solutions for benchmark instances with up to 10,700 vertices, the only benchmark instances which were solved by the ILP solver CPLEX using our ILP model. At least one of our heuristics generated an optimal solution for 41% of the instances for which CPLEX proved optimality, while for the remaining instances in this subset, the average absolute deviation from the optimum was only 1.58 vertices. In total, we report the behavior of the heuristics for over 1,100 instances with up to 25,000 vertices. In particular, Heuristics H2 and H3 run in time $ O(n^3) $, and all proposed methods obtained solutions within 5 minutes in our computational experiments.

    Citation: Ernesto Parra Inza, Juan C. Hernández Gómez, José María Sigarreta Almira, Nodari Vakhania. Global total domination number: exact and approximate results[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(5): 14953-14983. doi: 10.3934/math.2026615

    Related Papers:

  • A nonempty set $ S \subseteq V $ is a global total dominating set (GTDS) in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ if every vertex in both $ G $ and its complement $ \overline{G} $ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $ S $. The problem of finding a GTDS with the minimum cardinality $ \gamma^g_t(G) $ is $ NP $-hard, whereas no exact or approximation algorithm is known for the problem. We derive several new bounds and exact results for $ \gamma_t^g(G) $, particularly for graphs of diameter $ 2 $ and triangle-free graphs. We propose an integer linear programming (ILP) model, as a natural adaptation of a previous model for the global dominating set problem. We build three heuristic algorithms that we evaluate against optimal solutions for benchmark instances with up to 10,700 vertices, the only benchmark instances which were solved by the ILP solver CPLEX using our ILP model. At least one of our heuristics generated an optimal solution for 41% of the instances for which CPLEX proved optimality, while for the remaining instances in this subset, the average absolute deviation from the optimum was only 1.58 vertices. In total, we report the behavior of the heuristics for over 1,100 instances with up to 25,000 vertices. In particular, Heuristics H2 and H3 run in time $ O(n^3) $, and all proposed methods obtained solutions within 5 minutes in our computational experiments.



    加载中


    [1] W. Carballosa, J. Wisby, Total k-domination in cartesian product of complete graphs, Discrete Appl. Math., 337 (2023), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2023.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2023.04.008
    [2] A. Casado, J. Sánchez-Oro, A. Martínez-Gavara, Heuristics for the weighted total domination problem, Top, 33 (2025), 395–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-025-00695-1 doi: 10.1007/s11750-025-00695-1
    [3] I. Rios-Villamar, A. Cabrera-Martínez, G. Reyna Hernández, J. M. Sigarreta, Double total domination number of some graph operators, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 49 (2026), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-025-02016-y doi: 10.1007/s40840-025-02016-y
    [4] M. H. Akhbari, C. Eslahchi, N. J. Rad, R. Hasni, Some remarks on global total domination in graphs, Appl. Math. E-Notes, 15 (2015), 22–28.
    [5] B. S. Panda, P. Goyal, Global total k-domination: approximation and hardness results, Theoretical Comput. Sci., 850 (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2020.10.027 doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.10.027
    [6] B. S. Panda, P. Goyal, Hardness results of global total k-domination problem in graphs, Discrete Appl. Math., 319 (2022), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2021.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2021.02.018
    [7] S. Bermudo, A. C. Martínez, F. A. H. Mira, J. M. Sigarreta, On the global total k-domination number of graphs, Discrete Appl. Math., 263 (2019), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.05.025 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.05.025
    [8] P. Corcoran, A. Gagarin, Heuristics for k-domination models of facility location problems in street networks, Comput. Oper. Res., 133 (2021), 105368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105368 doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105368
    [9] P. J. Wan, K. M. Alzoubi, O. Frieder, Distributed construction of connected dominating set in wireless ad hoc networks, Mobile Netw. Appl., 9 (2004), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MONE.0000013625.87793.13 doi: 10.1023/B:MONE.0000013625.87793.13
    [10] J. Wu, B. Wu, I. Stojmenovic, Power-aware broadcasting and activity scheduling in ad hoc wireless networks using connected dominating sets, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., 3 (2003), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.125 doi: 10.1002/wcm.125
    [11] V. R. Kulli, B. Janakiram, The total global domination number of a graph, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 27 (1996), 537–542.
    [12] T. W. Haynes, M. A. Henning, C. M. Mynhardt, Global total domination in graphs, Bull. Inst. Comb. Appl., 24 (1998), 75–91.
    [13] J. D. Raj, V. S. Flower, A note on global total domination in graphs, Bull. Pure Appl. Sci.-Math. Stat., 30 (2011), 63–70.
    [14] N. J. Rad, E. Sharifi, Bounds on global total domination in graphs, Comput. Sci. J. Moldova, 23 (2015), 3–10.
    [15] F. A. Hernández Mira, E. Parra Inza, J. M. Sigarreta Almira, N. Vakhania, Properties of the global total k-domination number, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9050480 doi: 10.3390/math9050480
    [16] E. Parra Inza, N. Vakhania, J. M. Sigarreta Almira, F. A. Hernández Mira, Algorithms for the global domination problem, Comput. Oper. Res., 173 (2025), 106876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2024.106876 doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2024.106876
    [17] E. Parra Inza, Random graph, Mendeley Data, Version 7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.17632/rr5bkj6dw5.7
    [18] W. J. Desormeaux, T. W. Haynes, M. A. Henning, A. Yeo, Total domination in graphs with diameter 2, J. Graph Theory, 75 (2014), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.21725 doi: 10.1002/jgt.21725
    [19] W. Goddard, M. A. Henning, Domination in planar graphs with small diameter, J. Graph Theory, 40 (2002), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.10027 doi: 10.1002/jgt.10027
    [20] E. Parra Inza, N. Vakhania, J. M. Sigarreta Almira, J. A. Hernández-Aguilar, Approximating a minimum dominating set by purification, Algorithms, 17 (2024), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17060258 doi: 10.3390/a17060258
    [21] E. Parra Inza, Random graph, Mendeley Data, Version 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17632/rr5bkj6dw5.9
    [22] E. Parra Inza, Random graph BD4, Mendeley Data, Version 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17632/hyw9nckdsj.1
    [23] E. Parra Inza, Random graph BD5, Mendeley Data, Version 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17632/bhb7vpc2r8.1
    [24] P. Erdős, A. Rényi, On random graphs Ⅰ, Publ. Math., 6 (1959), 290–297.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(69) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(15)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog