We propose the Frailty-Augmented Logistic-Weighted Lomax Mixture (F-LLoM), a finite-mixture survival model that combines gamma frailty within components with covariate-dependent multinomial logistic mixing weights. After integrating out the frailty, each component follows a Lomax (Pareto II) distribution, enabling flexible modeling of heavy-tailed survival times and latent heterogeneity, while covariates affect both tier membership and within-tier hazard scales. We derive identifiability conditions, moment expressions, and tail properties, and develop a censoring-aware expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm for right-censored data. In simulation studies with sample sizes between 500 and 1000 and censoring rates up to 20%, the Bayesian information criterion consistently selected the true number of components, and the EM algorithm showed stable convergence with well-calibrated predictions. An application to the Rossi recidivism dataset illustrates the practical implementation of the model and favors a parsimonious specification. The proposed framework provides a practical and interpretable approach for analyzing heterogeneous and heavy-tailed survival data.
Citation: Mohieddine Rahmouni. Frailty-Augmented Logistic-Weighted Lomax Mixture regression for survival analysis[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(3): 6329-6349. doi: 10.3934/math.2026261
We propose the Frailty-Augmented Logistic-Weighted Lomax Mixture (F-LLoM), a finite-mixture survival model that combines gamma frailty within components with covariate-dependent multinomial logistic mixing weights. After integrating out the frailty, each component follows a Lomax (Pareto II) distribution, enabling flexible modeling of heavy-tailed survival times and latent heterogeneity, while covariates affect both tier membership and within-tier hazard scales. We derive identifiability conditions, moment expressions, and tail properties, and develop a censoring-aware expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm for right-censored data. In simulation studies with sample sizes between 500 and 1000 and censoring rates up to 20%, the Bayesian information criterion consistently selected the true number of components, and the EM algorithm showed stable convergence with well-calibrated predictions. An application to the Rossi recidivism dataset illustrates the practical implementation of the model and favors a parsimonious specification. The proposed framework provides a practical and interpretable approach for analyzing heterogeneous and heavy-tailed survival data.
| [1] |
M. E. Bakr, O. S. Balogun, A. A. El-Toony, A. M. Gadallah, Reliability analysis for unknown age class of lifetime distribution with real applications in medical science, Symmetry, 16 (2024), 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111514 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111514 doi: 10.3390/sym16111514
|
| [2] |
K. J. Haganawiga, S. K. Pal, A. Sirohi, Suitable survival models for analyzing infant and child mortality data, Stat. J. IAOS, 40 (2024), 959–968. https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-240073 doi: 10.3233/sji-240073
|
| [3] | J. P. Klein, M. L. Moeschberger, Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data, Springer New York, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97377 |
| [4] |
D. R. Cox, Regression models and life-tables, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 34 (1972), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
|
| [5] |
P. Hougaard, Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions, Biometrika, 73 (1986), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.2.387 doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.2.387
|
| [6] | A. Wienke, Frailty models in survival analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420073911 |
| [7] | G. McLachlan, D. Peel, Finite mixture models, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471721182 |
| [8] |
M. Rahmouni, The doubly generalized exponential-geometric frailty distribution, AIMS Math., 10 (2025), 30384–30428. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20251334 doi: 10.3934/math.20251334
|
| [9] |
M. Rahmouni, The doubly generalized Weibull power series frailty distribution, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 23 (2025), 255. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-255 doi: 10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-255
|
| [10] | J. D. Kalbfleisch, R. L. Prentice, The statistical analysis of failure time data, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032985 |
| [11] |
K. S. Lomax, Business failures: another example of the analysis of failure data, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 49 (1954), 847–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501239 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1954.10501239
|
| [12] |
H. Teicher, Identifiability of finite mixtures, Ann. Math. Statist., 34 (1963), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703862 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177703862
|
| [13] |
S. J. Yakowitz, J. D. Spragins, On the identifiability of finite mixtures, Ann. Math. Statist., 39 (1968), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177698520 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177698520
|
| [14] |
W. Yao, Label switching and its solutions for frequentist mixture models, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 85 (2013), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.859259 doi: 10.1080/00949655.2013.859259
|
| [15] |
A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, D. B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 39 (1977), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
|
| [16] | A. Agresti, Categorical data analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471249688 |
| [17] |
G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Statist., 6 (1978), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
|
| [18] |
C. Biernacki, G. Celeux, G. Govaert, Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22 (2000), 719–725. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.865189 doi: 10.1109/34.865189
|
| [19] | P. H. Rossi, R. A. Berk, K. J. Lenihan, Money, work, and crime: experimental evidence, New York: Academic Press, Burlington, 1980. |