In this paper, a semi-parametric distributional inference framework was developed for mean residual life analysis when the inspection age is latent, random, or only indirectly specified through a stochastic monitoring mechanism. Classical mean residual life methods evaluate the expected remaining lifetime at a fixed and fully observed age, an assumption that may be restrictive in reliability, survival, and predictive-maintenance studies where inspection times are irregular, missing, or governed by external monitoring policies. For a lifetime variable T and an independent random inspection age X, the proposed framework targeted the conditional residual-life functional $ (T-X|T\;>X) $, thereby incorporating uncertainty in the observation process directly into lifetime-distribution analysis. The lifetime distribution was estimated nonparametrically, whereas the latent inspection-age distribution was modeled parametrically, leading to a flexible and implementable inference procedure for complete and right-censored lifetime data. Under the exponential inspection model, explicit finite-sum representations were derived, avoiding numerical double integration and enabling direct computation from ordered lifetime observations and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. The theoretical development established strong consistency and derived the asymptotic normality of the complete-data estimator. A plug-in estimator of the asymptotic variance was also introduced, yielding analytically justified standard errors and large-sample confidence intervals. Simulation studies under Weibull and gamma lifetime distributions demonstrated coherent finite-sample performance across aging regimes, inspection intensities, sample sizes, and censoring proportions. A fixed-age benchmark comparison further showed that replacing the random inspection age by its mean may conceal important distributional effects of monitoring uncertainty. Real-data analyses using kidney catheter survival data, aircraft air-conditioning failure times, and NASA C-MAPSS turbofan degradation lifetimes illustrated the practical value of the proposed methodology in biomedical, engineering, and predictive-maintenance applications. The proposed approach therefore contributes to statistical distribution theory and its applications by extending classical residual-life inference to modern lifetime-data settings in which observation ages are unavailable, irregularly recorded, or operationally uncertain.
Citation: Thamer Manshi. Semi-parametric distributional inference for mean residual life with latent random inspection[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(9): 28502-28546. doi: 10.3934/math.20261136
In this paper, a semi-parametric distributional inference framework was developed for mean residual life analysis when the inspection age is latent, random, or only indirectly specified through a stochastic monitoring mechanism. Classical mean residual life methods evaluate the expected remaining lifetime at a fixed and fully observed age, an assumption that may be restrictive in reliability, survival, and predictive-maintenance studies where inspection times are irregular, missing, or governed by external monitoring policies. For a lifetime variable T and an independent random inspection age X, the proposed framework targeted the conditional residual-life functional $ (T-X|T\;>X) $, thereby incorporating uncertainty in the observation process directly into lifetime-distribution analysis. The lifetime distribution was estimated nonparametrically, whereas the latent inspection-age distribution was modeled parametrically, leading to a flexible and implementable inference procedure for complete and right-censored lifetime data. Under the exponential inspection model, explicit finite-sum representations were derived, avoiding numerical double integration and enabling direct computation from ordered lifetime observations and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. The theoretical development established strong consistency and derived the asymptotic normality of the complete-data estimator. A plug-in estimator of the asymptotic variance was also introduced, yielding analytically justified standard errors and large-sample confidence intervals. Simulation studies under Weibull and gamma lifetime distributions demonstrated coherent finite-sample performance across aging regimes, inspection intensities, sample sizes, and censoring proportions. A fixed-age benchmark comparison further showed that replacing the random inspection age by its mean may conceal important distributional effects of monitoring uncertainty. Real-data analyses using kidney catheter survival data, aircraft air-conditioning failure times, and NASA C-MAPSS turbofan degradation lifetimes illustrated the practical value of the proposed methodology in biomedical, engineering, and predictive-maintenance applications. The proposed approach therefore contributes to statistical distribution theory and its applications by extending classical residual-life inference to modern lifetime-data settings in which observation ages are unavailable, irregularly recorded, or operationally uncertain.
| [1] |
J. Navarro, P. J. Hernández, Mean residual life functions of finite mixtures, order statistics and coherent systems, Metrika, 67 (2008), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-007-0133-8 doi: 10.1007/s00184-007-0133-8
|
| [2] |
L. Sun, Q. Zhao, A class of mean residual life regression models with censored survival data, J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 140 (2010), 3425–3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.05.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.05.012
|
| [3] |
A. Patra, C. Kundu, Stochastic comparisons and ageing properties of RLRT (ITRT) based on variance residual life, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 51 (2022), 4276–4295. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2020.1812655 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1812655
|
| [4] |
B. Wang, X. Song, Q. Zhao, Proportional mean residual life model with varying coefficients for right-censored data, Stat. Med., 44 (2025), e70008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70008 doi: 10.1002/sim.70008
|
| [5] |
Y. Lin, X. Yang, F. Bai, Estimation and inference for the additive mean residual life model with change point in the continuous covariate, Stat. Med., 44 (2025), e70133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70133 doi: 10.1002/sim.70133
|
| [6] |
A. Shafiq, A. B. Çolak, S. A. Lone, T. N. Sindhu, T. Muhammad, Reliability modeling and analysis of mixture of exponential distributions using artificial neural network, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 47 (2024), 3308–3328. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8178 doi: 10.1002/mma.8178
|
| [7] |
A. Shafiq, A. B. Çolak, T. N. Sindhu, Reliability investigation of exponentiated Weibull distribution using IPL through numerical and artificial neural network modeling, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 38 (2022), 3616–3631. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3155 doi: 10.1002/qre.3155
|
| [8] |
T. N. Sindhu, A. B. Çolak, S. A. Lone, A. Shafiq, Reliability study of generalized exponential distribution based on inverse power law using artificial neural network with Bayesian regularization, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 39 (2023), 2398–2421. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3352 doi: 10.1002/qre.3352
|
| [9] |
A. Shafiq, T. N. Sindhu, S. A. Lone, T. A. Abushal, M. K. H. Hassan, An updated software reliability model using the Shanker model and failure data, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 40 (2024), 2078–2095. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3512 doi: 10.1002/qre.3512
|
| [10] |
M. Tao, J. Xu, S. Zhang, J. Tan, J. Xu, Precision sensitivity optimization for parallel robotic system based on multi-source preventive maintenance, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 31 (2024), 2450019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539324500190 doi: 10.1142/S0218539324500190
|
| [11] |
L. Wang, Z. Zhu, X. Zhao, Dynamic predictive maintenance decisions based on system remaining useful life prediction and three inspection strategies, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 32 (2025), 2550011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539325500111 doi: 10.1142/S0218539325500111
|
| [12] |
T. Nguyen, Y. Liao, Y. Lin, P. Chang, System reliability analysis for a stochastic liner container shipping service with stochastic terminals, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 30 (2023), 2250019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021853932250019X doi: 10.1142/S021853932250019X
|
| [13] |
A. Leccadito, A. Staino, P. Toscano, A novel robust method for estimating the covariance matrix of financial returns with applications to risk management, Financ. Innov., 10 (2024), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00642-2 doi: 10.1186/s40854-024-00642-2
|
| [14] |
M. Asadi, A. Berred, The mean residual life at random age and its connection to variability measures, Probab. Eng. Inf. Sci., 39 (2025), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026996482400010X doi: 10.1017/S026996482400010X
|
| [15] |
N. Cai, Y. Zheng, Preservation of generalized ageing classes on the residual life at random times, J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 142 (2012), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.004
|
| [16] |
M. Asadi, M. Finkelstein, On variability of the mean remaining lifetime at random age, TEST, 33 (2024), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-023-00917-3 doi: 10.1007/s11749-023-00917-3
|
| [17] |
A. Patra, C. Kundu, On generalized orderings and ageing classes for residual life and inactivity time at random time, Metrika, 82 (2019), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-018-0701-0 doi: 10.1007/s00184-018-0701-0
|
| [18] |
Z. Su, L. Fang, A novel method to calculate mean survival time for time-to-event data, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 41 (2012), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2011.598996 doi: 10.1080/03610918.2011.598996
|
| [19] | B. Park, J. Sohn, S. Lee, Nonparametric estimation of mean residual life function under random censorship, J. Korean Stat. Soc., 22 (1993), 147–157. |
| [20] |
D. M. Bradley, R. C. Gupta, Limiting behaviour of the mean residual life, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 55 (2003), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530495 doi: 10.1007/BF02530495
|
| [21] |
A. Alvarez-Iglesias, J. Newell, C. Scarrott, J. Hinde, Summarising censored survival data using the mean residual life function, Stat. Med., 34 (2015), 1965–1976. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6431 doi: 10.1002/sim.6431
|
| [22] |
E. E. A. Aly, Nonparametric tests for comparing two mean residual life functions, Lifetime Data Anal., 3 (1997), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009654112947 doi: 10.1023/A:1009654112947
|
| [23] |
M. Ghebremichael, Nonparametric estimation of mean residual functions, Lifetime Data Anal., 15 (2009), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-008-9089-x doi: 10.1007/s10985-008-9089-x
|
| [24] |
F. Proschan, Theoretical explanation of observed decreasing failure rate, Technometrics, 5 (1963), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1963.10490105 doi: 10.1080/00401706.1963.10490105
|
| [25] | W. Nelson, Applied life data analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725234 |
| [26] | A. Saxena, K. Goebel, Turbofan engine degradation simulation data set, NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, 2008. Available from: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/. |