
In this study, a fractional-order mathematical model of the transmission dynamics of drug-resistant tuberculosis within a two-patch system incorporating population migration was proposed and analyzed using the Caputo operator. The positivity, boundedness, existence, and uniqueness of the solutions as well as the Ulam-Hyers stability of the model were guaranteed. Additionally, the basic reproduction numbers were derived and analyzed for sensitivity to identify the key parameters that affected the spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Moreover, the cure rates were used as control variables to formulate an optimal control problem, which examined the efficacy of the control measures and the influence of fractional order on the control values. The numerical results showed that controlling the cure rate can significantly reduce the number of drug-resistant tuberculosis infections, thus verifying the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. As the fractional order decreased, the duration during which the maximum control intensity was applied in both patches increased.
Citation: Hongyan Wang, Shaoping Jiang, Yudie Hu, Supaporn Lonapalawong. Analysis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in a two-patch environment using Caputo fractional-order modeling[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32696-32733. doi: 10.3934/math.20241565
[1] | Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Velusamy Vijayakumar . Dynamical behavior of tumor-immune system with fractal-fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8751-8773. doi: 10.3934/math.2022489 |
[2] | Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046 |
[3] | Mdi Begum Jeelani, Abeer S. Alnahdi, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Mohammed S. Abdo, Hanan A. Wahash, M. A. Abdelkawy . Study of the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo type fractional system with a generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2001-2018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022115 |
[4] | Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216 |
[5] | Irina Volinsky, Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky . Mathematical analysis of tumor-free equilibrium in BCG treatment with effective IL-2 infusion for bladder cancer model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16388-16406. doi: 10.3934/math.2022896 |
[6] | Abdon Atangana . Fractional derivatives, dimensions, and geometric interpretation: An answer to your worries. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2562-2588. doi: 10.3934/math.2025119 |
[7] | Mohamed I. Abbas, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . Nonlinear fractional differential inclusions with non-singular Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20328-20340. doi: 10.3934/math.20221113 |
[8] | Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Nauman Ahmed, Ali Akgül, Ali Raza, Muhammad Shahzad, Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Rafiq, Fahd Jarad . Analysis of the fractional diarrhea model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13000-13018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022720 |
[9] | Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394 |
[10] | M. Mallika Arjunan, Nabil Mlaiki, V. Kavitha, Thabet Abdeljawad . On fractional state-dependent delay integro-differential systems under the Mittag-Leffler kernel in Banach space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1384-1409. doi: 10.3934/math.2023070 |
In this study, a fractional-order mathematical model of the transmission dynamics of drug-resistant tuberculosis within a two-patch system incorporating population migration was proposed and analyzed using the Caputo operator. The positivity, boundedness, existence, and uniqueness of the solutions as well as the Ulam-Hyers stability of the model were guaranteed. Additionally, the basic reproduction numbers were derived and analyzed for sensitivity to identify the key parameters that affected the spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Moreover, the cure rates were used as control variables to formulate an optimal control problem, which examined the efficacy of the control measures and the influence of fractional order on the control values. The numerical results showed that controlling the cure rate can significantly reduce the number of drug-resistant tuberculosis infections, thus verifying the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. As the fractional order decreased, the duration during which the maximum control intensity was applied in both patches increased.
Cancer is one of the most frequently encountered diseases that can lead to the end of human life in spite of the advances in science and medicine. It is a multi-staged disease which occurs as a result of changes in DNA formation (mutation) of abnormal cells. Uncontrolled proliferation of the cells causes tumors and a great number cells mutate in the human body on a daily basis. While some of these mutated cells die, others continue to live and form cancerous cells. Cancer can occur when the immune system or other defensive mechanisms fail to protect the human body from these cells [1]. Cancer cells are different from normal cells due to their size, shape, number, differentiation, function, and ability to travel to distant tissues and organ systems [1]. The immune system recognizes cancer cells and tumors from their antigens [2].
Dendritic cells known as professional antigen-presenting cells, send tumor antigens to lymph nodes to activate T lymphocytes after recognizing cancer cells. CD4+T cells play a central role in the initiation and progression of immune responses [3] and also help CD8+T cells to activate and proliferate [4]. The basic mechanism of tumor immunity is to kill tumor cells by the help of CD8+T cells. Immune reactions that provide protection against tumors, are typically the task of CD8+T cells. CD4+T cells also play a major role in these tasks [3]. Human CD4+T cells can identify tissue-specific antigens, common tumor antigens and viral antigens caused by tumor transformation [3]. Another task of CD4+T cells is to produce IL-2 as a result of antigen stimulation response. IL-2 has a potent T cell growth factor effect and it has been reported that the application of IL-2 seemingly leads to curative and persistent regressions in cancer patients [5].
Recently, interest in fractional has increased in order to clarify real life problems because of memory and hereditary property [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. One of the most common fractional operators is Caputo, Riemann-Liouville (RL). However, these operators are considered weakness due to singularity problems caused by their kernel function. As a result of this weakness, Atangana felt the need to define Atangana-Baleanu (AB) derivative in [15] and [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] are the some of the studies about AB derivative.
Mathematical modeling, known as the reinterpretation of real world problems with mathematical equations, has recently become one of the tools that scientists use to foresee the development of diseases that cause serious problems. [26,27,28,29,30] are some of the studies which attempt to show the relation between cancer and immune system by way of mathematical modeling.
The study is organized as: In section 2, some basic definitions and theorems to be used in study are briefly mentioned. In section 3, the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the fractional immune system-cancer model is given. The graphics of the numerical solution via predictor-corrector scheme is given in section 4 and comments is made on graphics. Lastly, we finalize our study in section 5. Briefly, the relationship between cancer cells and immune system cells will be examined with AB derivative and the effect of IL-2 and dendritic cells on cancer cells will be discussed using the integer form of model presented by Castiglione in [31].
Let us rearrange this model with fractional derivative:
ABC0Dτt(H(t))=a0+b0D(t)H(t)(1−H(t)f0)−c0H(t),ABC0Dτt(C(t))=a1+b1I(t)(M(t)+D(t))C(t)(1−C(t)f1)−c1C(t),ABC0Dτt(M(t))=b2M(t)(1−M(t)f2)−d2M(t)C(t),ABC0Dτt(D(t))=−d3D(t)C(t),ABC0Dτt(I(t))=b4D(t)H(t)−e4I(t)C(t)−c4I(t), | (1.1) |
with the initial conditions H(0)=0,C(0)=0,M(0)=1,D(0)=10,I(0)=0, where ABC0Dτt is AB derivative in Caputo sense and τ∈[0,1]. And H,C,M,D,I represent CD4+T (helper) cells, CD8+T (cytotoxic) cells, myeloid (cancer) cells, dendritic cells and IL-2, respectively.
In this part, some definitions and properties that will be helpful in this work is given.
Definition 2.1. Suppose that g∈H1(a,b), a<b be a function and τ∈[0,1]. The AB derivative in Caputo sense of order τ of g is given by [15]
ABCaDτt[g(t)]=F(τ)1−τt∫ag′(y)Eτ[−τ(t−y)τ1−τ]dy | (2.1) |
where Eτ is the Mittag-Leffler function and F(τ) is a normalization function with F(0)=F(1)=1.
Definition 2.2. Assume that g∈H1(a,b), a<b be a function and τ∈[0,1]. The AB derivative in RL sense of order Eτ of g is given by [15]:
ABRaDτt[g(t)]=F(τ)1−τddtt∫ag(y)Eτ[−τ(t−y)τ1−τ]dy. | (2.2) |
Definition 2.3. The fractional integral is given by [15]:
ABaIτt[g(t)]=1−τF(τ)g(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫ag(λ)(t−λ)τ−1dλ. | (2.3) |
Theorem 2.1. [15] Let g on [a,b] is a continuous function. Given the following inequality holds on [a,b]:
‖ABR0Dτt[g(t)]‖<F(τ)1−τ‖g(t)‖, | (2.4) |
where ‖g(t)‖=maxa≤t≤b|g(t)|.
Theorem 2.2. The AB derivative in Caputo and RL sense satisfy Lipschitz condition [15]:
‖ABC0Dτt[g(t)]−ABC0Dτt[h(t)]‖≤H‖g(t)−h(t)‖ | (2.5) |
and
‖ABR0Dτt[g(t)]−ABR0Dτt[h(t)]‖≤H‖g(t)−h(t)‖. | (2.6) |
Theorem 2.3. The fractional ordinary differential equation
ABC0Dτt(h(t))=s(t) |
has a unique solution given as [15]
h(t)=1−τF(τ)s(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫as(λ)(t−λ)τ−1dλ. |
Let P=C(K)×C(K)×C(K)×C(K)×C(K) and C(K) be a Banach space of continuous R→R valued functions on the interval K with the norm
‖(H,C,M,D,I)‖=‖H‖+‖C‖+‖M‖+‖D‖+‖I‖, |
where ‖H‖ = sup{|H(t)|:t∈K}, ‖C‖=sup{|C(t)|:t∈K}, ‖M‖=sup{|M(t)|:t∈K}, ‖D‖ = sup{|D(t)|:t∈K}, ‖I‖=sup{|I(t)|:t∈K}.
For clarity, we rewrite the model (1.1) of the following form:
ABC0Dτt(H(t))=N1(t,H),ABC0Dτt(C(t))=N2(t,C),ABC0Dτt(M(t))=N3(t,M),ABC0Dτt(D(t))=N4(t,D),ABC0Dτt(I(t))=N5(t,I). | (3.1) |
Using Theorem 2.3, the system (3.1) can be written as:
H(t)−H(0)=1−τF(τ)N1(t,H)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N1(λ,H)dλ,C(t)−C(0)=1−τF(τ)N2(t,C)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N2(λ,C)dλ,M(t)−M(0)=1−τF(τ)N3(t,M)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N3(λ,M)dλ,D(t)−D(0)=1−τF(τ)N4(t,D)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N4(λ,D)dλ,I(t)−I(0)=1−τF(τ)N5(t,I)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N5(λ,I)dλ. | (3.2) |
Theorem 3.1. If the following inequality holds
0≤b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0<1, |
then the kernel N1 satisfies the Lipschitz condition and contraction.
Proof. Let H and H1 be two functions, then we have
‖N1(t,H)−N1(t,H1)‖=‖−b0D(t)(H(t)−H1(t))−b0f0D(t)(H2(t)−H21(t))−c0(H(t)−H1(t))‖≤(b0‖D(t)‖+b0f0‖D(t)‖‖H(t)+H1(t)‖+c0)‖H(t)−H1(t)‖≤A1‖H(t)−H1(t)‖. | (3.3) |
Taking A1=b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0 where D, H and H1 are bounded functions such that ‖D(t)‖≤ψ4, ‖H(t)‖≤ψ1, ‖H1(t)‖≤ω1 then we have
‖N1(t,H)−N1(t,H1)‖≤A1‖H(t)−H1(t)‖. | (3.4) |
Hence, the Lipschitz condition is fulfilled for N1 and 0≤b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0<1 implies N1 is also contraction.
Similarly, the other kernels N2, N3, N4 and N5 satisfy Lipschitz condition and contraction.
Consider the system (3.2) in the following recursive formula:
Hn(t)=1−τF(τ)N1(t,Hn−1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N1(λ,Hn−1)dλ,Cn(t)=1−τF(τ)N2(t,Cn−1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N2(λ,Cn−1)dλ,Mn(t)=1−τF(τ)N3(t,Mn−1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N3(λ,Mn−1)dλ,Dn(t)=1−τF(τ)N4(t,Dn−1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N4(λ,Dn−1)dλ,In(t)=1−τF(τ)N5(t,In−1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1N5(λ,In−1)dλ, | (3.5) |
with the initial conditions
H0(t)=H(0),C0(t)=C(0),M0(t)=M(0),D0(t)=D(0),I0(t)=I(0). |
We find the difference between the successive terms in the expressions:
Φ1n(t)=Hn(t)−Hn−1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N1(t,Hn−1)−N1(t,Hn−2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N1(λ,Hn−1)−N1(λ,Hn−2)]dλ, |
Φ2n(t)=Cn(t)−Cn−1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N2(t,Cn−1)−N2(t,Cn−2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N2(λ,Cn−1)−N2(λ,Cn−2)]dλ, |
Φ3n(t)=Mn(t)−Mn−1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N3(t,Mn−1)−N3(t,Mn−2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N3(λ,Mn−1)−N3(λ,Mn−2)]dλ, |
Φ4n(t)=Dn(t)−Dn−1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N4(t,Dn−1)−N4(t,Dn−2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N4(λ,Dn−1)−N4(λ,Dn−2)]dλ, |
Φ5n(t)=In(t)−In−1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N5(t,In−1)−N5(t,In−2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N5(λ,In−1)−N5(λ,In−2)]dλ. | (3.6) |
Notice that
Hn(t)=n∑k=1Φ1k(t),Cn(t)=n∑k=1Φ2k(t),Mn(t)=n∑k=1Φ3k(t),Dn(t)=n∑k=1Φ4k(t),In(t)=n∑k=1Φ5k(t). | (3.7) |
Taking the norm on both sides of the Eq. (3.6) and applying triangular identity, we find
‖Φ1n(t)‖=‖Hn(t)−Hn−1(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)‖[N1(t,Hn−1)−N1(t,Hn−2)]‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)‖t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N1(λ,Hn−1)−N1(λ,Hn−2)]dλ‖ |
Because the kernel N1 satisfy Lipschitz condition proved in Eq. (3.4), we have
‖Φ1n(t)‖=‖Hn(t)−Hn−1(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A1‖Hn−1−Hn−2‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A1t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Hn−1−Hn−2‖dλ |
and
‖Φ1n(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A1‖Φ1(n−1)(t)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A1t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Φ1(n−1)(λ)‖dλ | (3.8) |
Analogously, we have the following results:
‖Φ2n(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A2‖Φ2(n−1)(t)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A2t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Φ2(n−1)(λ)‖dλ,‖Φ3n(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A3‖Φ3(n−1)(t)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A3t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Φ3(n−1)(λ)‖dλ,‖Φ4n(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A4‖Φ4(n−1)(t)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A4t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Φ4(n−1)(λ)‖dλ,‖Φ5n(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A5‖Φ5(n−1)(t)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A5t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖Φ5(n−1)(λ)‖dλ. | (3.9) |
In the light of the results in hand, we give the below theorem.
Theorem 3.2. The fractional model given in (1.1) has a solution, if we can find t0 satisfying the equation
1−τF(τ)Ai+tτ0F(τ)Γ(τ)Ai<1 |
for i=1,2,3,4,5.
Proof. We know that H(t), C(t), M(t), D(t) and I(t) are bounded functions and satisfy Lipschitz condition. From the Eqs. (3.8) and (3.9), we obtain the succeeding relations:
‖Φ1n(t)‖≤‖Hn(0)‖[1−τF(τ)A1+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1]n,‖Φ2n(t)‖≤‖Cn(0)‖[1−τF(τ)A2+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A2]n,‖Φ3n(t)‖≤‖Mn(0)‖[1−τF(τ)A3+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A3]n,‖Φ4n(t)‖≤‖Dn(0)‖[1−τF(τ)A4+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A4]n,‖Φ5n(t)‖≤‖In(0)‖[1−τF(τ)A5+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A5]n. | (3.10) |
Thus, the existence and continuity of the above solutions are proved. Our goal is to show that the above functions are solutions of Eq. (1.1), assume that
H(t)−H(0)=Hn(t)−K1n(t),C(t)−C(0)=Cn(t)−K2n(t),M(t)−M(0)=Mn(t)−K3n(t),D(t)−D(0)=Dn(t)−K4n(t),I(t)−I(0)=In(t)−K5n(t). | (3.11) |
Then, we have
‖K1n(t)‖=‖1−τF(τ)[N1(t,H)−N1(t,Hn−1)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N1(λ,H)−N1(λ,Hn−1)]dλ‖≤1−τF(τ)‖N1(t,H)−N1(t,Hn−1)‖+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t∫0(t−λ)τ−1‖N1(λ,H)−N1(λ,Hn−1)dλ‖≤1−τF(τ)A1‖H−Hn−1‖+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1‖H−Hn−1‖. | (3.12) |
By continuing this method recursively, it gives at t0
‖K1n(t)‖≤(1−τF(τ)+tτ0F(τ)Γ(τ))n+1An+11a. | (3.13) |
As n approaches to ∞, ‖K1n(t)‖ tends to 0. In an analogous way, it can be shown ‖K2n(t)‖→0, ‖K3n(t)‖→0, ‖K4n(t)‖→0 and ‖K5n(t)‖→0.
It is another matter to demonstrate the uniqueness of the solutions of the Eq. (1.1). Suppose that there exist another set of solutions H1(t), C1(t), M1(t), D1(t) and I1(t), we find
H(t)−H1(t)=1−τF(τ)[N1(t,H)−N1(t,H1)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)×t∫0(t−λ)τ−1[N1(λ,H)−N1(λ,H1)]dλ | (3.14) |
Applying the norm to the Eq. (3.14) and because the kernel satisfies the Lipschitz condition, we find
‖H(t)−H1(t)‖≤1−τF(τ)A1‖H(t)−H1(t)‖+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1‖H(t)−H1(t)‖ | (3.15) |
This gives
‖H(t)−H1(t)‖(1−1−τF(τ)A1−tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1)≤0. | (3.16) |
Clearly H(t)=H1(t), if the following inequality holds
(1−1−τF(τ)A1−tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1)>0, | (3.17) |
Using the same attitude, we obtain
C(t)=C1(t),M(t)=M1(t),D(t)=D1(t),I(t)=I1(t). |
In this section, graphs obtained by using predictor-corrector numerical scheme given in [32] of fractional mathematical model in Eq. (1.1) is given. Our aim is to observe how cancer cells and immune system cells change as fractional order changes. In addition, the interaction between cancer cells and immune system cells can be observed by means of graphs. We use the initial conditions (0,0,1,10,0) for H,C,M,D,I, respectively and use parameters a0=10−4, b0=10−1, f0=1, c0=0.005, a1=10−4, b1=10−2, f1=1, c1=0.005, b2=0.02, f2=1, d2=0.1, d3=0.1, b4=10−2, e4=10−7, c4=10−2 given in [31]. Figures 1–3 represents that the action of the fractional cancer-immune system model constituent for distinct values of τ and it can be seen that as the fractional order τ is decreased, the number of helper, cytotoxic, dendritic cells and IL-2 are increased, while the cancer cells is declined. In other words, when τ=0.98, approximately 60 percent of cancer cells die, while τ=0.65, about 90 percent die. Moreover, Figures 4–5 represents that numerical simulations for the Eq. (1.1) at τ=0.9, τ=0.8, τ=0.7 and τ=0.6, respectively.
Cancer is an issue that needs to be addressed when because of affects many people's lives directly and indirectly. How does the body respond to cancer? The answer to the question can be made more effective in the fight against cancer. So, the integer order cancer-immune system model given in [31] is studied in this paper. Firstly, the cancer-immune system model is modified by AB derivative and then the existence and uniqueness of numerical solution of this model is given. After obtaining graphs related to the model with predictor-corrector numerical method, these graphs is interpreted briefly it can be seen that as τ is increased, it is observed that immune system cells eliminate cancer cells less in these graphs. Apparently, because of the hereditary property of fractional derivative, the fractional derivative is more suitable for real life events.
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | World Health Organization, Tuberculosis, 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-zoom/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis. |
[2] | World Health Organization, Global tuberculosis report 2023, 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240083851. |
[3] |
X. Zhang, A. Ali, M. A. Khan, M. Y. Alshahrani, T. Muhammad, S. Islam, Mathematical analysis of the TB model with treatment via Caputo-type fractional derivative, Discrete Dyn. Nature Soc., 2021 (2021), 9512371. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9512371 doi: 10.1155/2021/9512371
![]() |
[4] |
O. Nave, I. Hartuv, U. Shemesh, Θ-SEIHRD mathematical model of COVID 19-stability analysis using fast-slow decomposition, PeerJ, 8 (2020), e10019. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10019 doi: 10.7717/peerj.10019
![]() |
[5] |
A. Abidemi, K. M. Owolabi, E. Pindza, Modelling the transmission dynamics of Lassa fever with nonlinear incidence rate and vertical transmission, Phys. A, 597 (2022), 127259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127259 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127259
![]() |
[6] |
H. Waaler, A. Geser, S. Andersen, The use of mathematical models in the study of the epidemiology of tuberculosis, Amer. J. Public Health, 52 (1962), 1002–1013. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.52.6.1002 doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.6.1002
![]() |
[7] |
E. Pienaar, A. M. Fluitt, S. E. Whitney, A. G. Freifeld, H. J. Viljoen, A model of tuberculosis transmission and intervention strategies in an urban residential area, Comput. Biol. Chem., 34 (2010), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.03.003
![]() |
[8] |
M. A. Khan, M. Ahmad, S. Ullah, M. Farooq, T. Gul, Modeling the transmission dynamics of tuberculosis in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan, Adv. Mech. Eng., 11 (2019), 4835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019854835 doi: 10.1177/1687814019854835
![]() |
[9] |
R. I. Gweryina, C. E. Madubueze, V. P. Bajiya, F. E. Esla, Modeling and analysis of tuberculosis and pneumonia co-infection dynamics with cost-effective strategies, Results Control Optim., 10 (2023), 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2023.100210 doi: 10.1016/j.rico.2023.100210
![]() |
[10] |
Y. Yu, Y. Shi, W. Yao, Dynamic model of tuberculosis considering multi-drug resistance and their applications, Infect. Dis. Modell., 3 (2018), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2018.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2018.11.001
![]() |
[11] |
M. Ronoh, R. Jaroudi, P. Fotso, V. Kamdoum, N. Matendechere, J. Wairimu, et al., A mathematical model of tuberculosis with drug resistance effects, Appl. Math., 7 (2016), 1303–1316. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.712115 doi: 10.4236/am.2016.712115
![]() |
[12] |
A. Xu, Z. Wen, Y. Wang, W. Wang, Prediction of different interventions on the burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China: a dynamic modelling study, J. Global Antimicrob. Resist., 29 (2022), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2022.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.03.018
![]() |
[13] |
W. Wang, X. Q. Zhao, An epidemic model in a patchy environment, Math. Biosci., 190 (2004), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2002.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2002.11.001
![]() |
[14] |
G. R. Phaijoo, D. B Gurung, Mathematical study of dengue disease transmission in multi-patch environment, Appl. Math., 7 (2016), 1521. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.714132 doi: 10.4236/am.2016.714132
![]() |
[15] |
J. Rebaza, Global stability of a multipatch disease epidemics model, Chaos Solitons Fract., 120 (2019), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.01.020
![]() |
[16] |
J. Zhang, X. Ma, Z. Jin, Stability analysis of an HIV/AIDS epidemic model with sexual transmission in a patchy environment, J. Biol. Dyn., 17 (2023), 2227216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2023.2227216 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2023.2227216
![]() |
[17] |
J. J. Tewa, S. Bowong, B. Mewoli, Mathematical analysis of two-patch model for the dynamical transmission of tuberculosis, Appl. Math. Modell., 36 (2012), 2466–2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.004
![]() |
[18] |
J. J. Tewa, S. Bowong, S. O. Noutchie, Mathematical analysis of a two-patch model of tuberculosis disease with staged progression, Appl. Math. Modell., 36 (2012), 5792–5807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.026 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.026
![]() |
[19] |
A. W. B. Kimba, D. Moustapha, B. Saley, Mathematical analysis and simulation of an age-structured model with two-patch and an uncontrolled migration: application to tuberculosis, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., 15 (2022), 2054–2073. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i4.4556 doi: 10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i4.4556
![]() |
[20] |
R. Ouncharoen, K. Shah, R. U. Din, T. Abdeljawad, A. Ahmadian, S. Salahshour, et al., Study of integer and fractional order COVID-19 mathematical model, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2340046. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400467 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23400467
![]() |
[21] |
C. W. Chukwu, E. Bonyah, M. L. Juga, Fatmawati, On mathematical modeling of fractional-order stochastic for tuberculosis transmission dynamics, Results Control Optim., 11 (2023), 100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2023.100238 doi: 10.1016/j.rico.2023.100238
![]() |
[22] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
![]() |
[23] | A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model, arXiv, 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.03408 |
[24] |
E. F. D. Goufo, Application of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative without singular kernel to Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation, Math. Modell. Anal., 21 (2016), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2016.1145607 doi: 10.3846/13926292.2016.1145607
![]() |
[25] | K. A. Adedokun, M. O. Olayiwola, I. A. Alaje, A. O. Yunus, A. O. Oladapo, K. O. Kareem, A Caputo fractional-order model of tuberculosis incorporating enlightenment and therapy using the Laplace-Adomian decomposition method, Int. J. Modell. Simul., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2024.2315361 |
[26] |
P. A. Naik, J. Zu, K. M. Owolabi, Global dynamics of a fractional order model for the transmission of HIV epidemic with optimal control, Chaos Solitons Fract., 138 (2020), 109826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109826 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109826
![]() |
[27] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-0208(06)x8001-5 |
[28] |
A. Hanif, A. I. Butt, Atangana-Baleanu fractional dynamics of dengue fever with optimal control strategies, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 15499–15535. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023791 doi: 10.3934/math.2023791
![]() |
[29] |
A. Hanif, A. I. Butt, T. Ismaeel, Fractional optimal control analysis of COVID-19 and dengue fever co-infection model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 5171–5203. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024251 doi: 10.3934/math.2024251
![]() |
[30] |
A. Omame, M. Abbas, C. P. Onyenegecha, A fractional-order model for COVID-19 and tuberculosis co-infection using Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos Solitons Fract., 153 (2021), 111486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111486 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111486
![]() |
[31] |
S. Kumar, R. P. Chauhan, S. Momani, S. Hadid, A study of fractional TB model due to mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria, Chaos Solitons Fract., 153 (2021), 111452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111452 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111452
![]() |
[32] |
Z. U. A. Zafar, S. Zaib, M. T. Hussain, C. Tunç, S. Javeed, Analysis and numerical simulation of tuberculosis model using different fractional derivatives, Chaos Solitons Fract., 160 (2022), 112202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112202 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112202
![]() |
[33] |
J. Panchal, F. Acharya, K. Joshi, A noninteger order SEITR dynamical model for TB, Adv. Contin. Discrete Models, 2022 (2022), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03700-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-022-03700-0
![]() |
[34] |
K. M. Owolabi, E. Pindza, A nonlinear epidemic model for tuberculosis with Caputo operator and fixed point theory, Healthcare Anal., 2 (2022), 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2022.100111 doi: 10.1016/j.health.2022.100111
![]() |
[35] |
M. Jafari, H. Kheiri, A. Jabbari, Backward bifurcation in a fractional-order and two-patch model of tuberculosis epidemic with incomplete treatment, Int. J. Biomath., 14 (2021), 2150007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524521500078 doi: 10.1142/S1793524521500078
![]() |
[36] |
H. Kheiri, M. Jafari, Global stability and optimal control of a two-patch tuberculosis epidemic model using fractional-order derivatives, Int. J. Biomath., 13 (2020), 2050008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524520500084 doi: 10.1142/S1793524520500084
![]() |
[37] |
Z. Lu, Y. Chen, Y. Yu, G. Ren, C. Xu, W. Ma, et al., The effect mitigation measures for COVID-19 by a fractional-order SEIHRDP model with individuals migration, ISA Trans., 132 (2023), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.12.006
![]() |
[38] |
H. Kheiri, M. Jafari, Stability analysis of a fractional order model for the HIV/AIDS epidemic in a patchy environment, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 346 (2019), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.06.055 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.06.055
![]() |
[39] | I. Petráš, Fractional-order nonlinear systems, Springer, 2011. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18101-6 |
[40] |
Z. M. Odibat, N. T. Shawagfeh, Generalized Taylor's formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.102 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.102
![]() |
[41] |
A. Mahata, S. Paul, S. Mukherjee, M. Das, B. Roy, Dynamics of Caputo fractional order SEIRV epidemic model with optimal control and stability analysis, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 8 (2022), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-021-01224-x doi: 10.1007/s40819-021-01224-x
![]() |
[42] |
P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
![]() |
[43] | H. L. Smith, P. Waltman, The theory of the chemostat: dynamics of microbial competition, Cambridge University Press, 1995. https://doi.org/110.2307/2405002 |
[44] |
K. Shah, A. Ali, S. Zeb, A. Khan, M. A. Alqudah, T. Abdeljawad, Study of fractional order dynamics of nonlinear mathematical model, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2002), 11211–11224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.039 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.039
![]() |
[45] |
M. Toufik, A. Atangana, New numerical approximation of fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel: application to chaotic models, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 444. https://doi.org/10.1140/EPJP/I2017-11717-0 doi: 10.1140/EPJP/I2017-11717-0
![]() |
[46] |
N. Chitnis, J. M. Hyman, J. M. Cushing, Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through the sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model, Bull. Math. Biol., 70 (2008), 1272–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9299-0 doi: 10.1007/s11538-008-9299-0
![]() |
[47] |
R. Kamocki, Pontryagin maximum principle for fractional ordinary optimal control problems, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 70 (2014), 1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.2928 doi: 10.1002/mma.2928
![]() |
1. | Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Derya Avcı, Separable solutions of Cattaneo-Hristov heat diffusion equation in a line segment: Cauchy and source problems, 2021, 60, 11100168, 2347, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.018 | |
2. | Joshua Asamoah, Zhen Jin, Baba Seidu, F.T. Odoro, Gui-Quan Sun, Faris Alzahrani, Mathematical Modelling and Sensitivity Assessment of COVID-19 Outbreak for Ghana and Egypt, 2020, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.3612877 | |
3. | Seher Melike Aydogan, Dumitru Baleanu, Hakimeh Mohammadi, Shahram Rezapour, On the mathematical model of Rabies by using the fractional Caputo–Fabrizio derivative, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02798-4 | |
4. | Ozlem Defterli, Comparative analysis of fractional order dengue model with temperature effect via singular and non-singular operators, 2021, 144, 09600779, 110654, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110654 | |
5. | Marcela A. Fabio, Silvia A. Seminara, María Inés Troparevsky, 2021, Chapter 1, 978-3-030-61712-7, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-61713-4_1 | |
6. | Sümeyra Uçar, Necati Özdemir, İlknur Koca, Eren Altun, Novel analysis of the fractional glucose–insulin regulatory system with non-singular kernel derivative, 2020, 135, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00420-w | |
7. | Eyüp Akçetin, Ilknur Koca, Muhammet Burak Kiliç, New analysis and application of fractional order Schrödinger equation using with Atangana–Batogna numerical scheme, 2021, 37, 0749-159X, 196, 10.1002/num.22525 | |
8. | Ali Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt, Thabet Abdeljawad, Mathematical modeling of the immune-chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancer under some control parameters, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03151-5 | |
9. | Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Ilknur Koca, Fractional stochastic sır model, 2021, 22113797, 104124, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104124 | |
10. | Ali Yousef, A fractional-order model of COVID-19 with a strong Allee effect considering the fear effect spread by social networks to the community and the existence of the silent spreaders during the pandemic stage, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 10052, 10.3934/math.2022560 | |
11. | Sümeyra Uçar, Analysis of hepatitis B disease with fractal–fractional Caputo derivative using real data from Turkey, 2023, 419, 03770427, 114692, 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114692 | |
12. | Zulqurnain Sabir, Maham Munawar, Mohamed A. Abdelkawy, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Canan Ünlü, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Abeer S. Alnahdi, Numerical Investigations of the Fractional-Order Mathematical Model Underlying Immune-Chemotherapeutic Treatment for Breast Cancer Using the Neural Networks, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 184, 10.3390/fractalfract6040184 | |
13. | Esmehan Uçar, Necati Özdemir, New Fractional Cancer Mathematical Model via IL-10 Cytokine and Anti-PD-L1 Inhibitor, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 151, 10.3390/fractalfract7020151 | |
14. | Peijiang Liu, Taj Munir, Ting Cui, Anwarud Din, Peng Wu, Mathematical assessment of the dynamics of the tobacco smoking model: An application of fractional theory, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 7143, 10.3934/math.2022398 | |
15. | Derya Avcı, Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Optimal control of the Cattaneo–Hristov heat diffusion model, 2021, 232, 0001-5970, 3529, 10.1007/s00707-021-03019-z | |
16. | Esmehan Uçar, Necati Özdemir, Eren Altun, Qualitative analysis and numerical simulations of new model describing cancer, 2023, 422, 03770427, 114899, 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114899 | |
17. | M. Iadh Ayari, Sabri T.M. Thabet, Qualitative properties and approximate solutions of thermostat fractional dynamics system via a nonsingular kernel operator, 2023, 1319-5166, 10.1108/AJMS-06-2022-0147 | |
18. | Mohammad Partohaghighi, Kalani Rubasinghe, Ali Akgül, Esra Karatas Akgül, Analysis of the Fractal-Fractional Modelling of Immune-Tumor Problem, 2022, 8, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-022-01331-3 | |
19. | A.S.V. Ravi Kanth, Sangeeta Devi, A computational approach for numerical simulations of the fractal–fractional autoimmune disease model, 2022, 165, 09600779, 112829, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112829 | |
20. | Derya Avcı, Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Necati Özdemir, A heat transfer problem with exponential memory and the associated thermal stresses, 2023, 39, 0749-159X, 231, 10.1002/num.22873 | |
21. | M. Elkaf, K. Allali, Fractional derivative model for tumor cells and immune system competition, 2023, 10, 23129794, 288, 10.23939/mmc2023.02.288 | |
22. | Sumeyra UCAR, Conformable Flett’s theorem and Sahoo and Riedel theorem, 2023, 25, 1301-7985, 464, 10.25092/baunfbed.1212939 | |
23. | Awatif Muflih Alqahtani, Akanksha Shukla, Computational analysis of multi-layered Navier–Stokes system by Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2024, 32, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2023.2290723 | |
24. | Ali Alhajraf, Ali Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt, An Analysis of a Fractional-Order Model of Colorectal Cancer and the Chemo-Immunotherapeutic Treatments with Monoclonal Antibody, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2374, 10.3390/math11102374 | |
25. | Bo Li, Kaiwen Chen, Bo Zhang, Dynamics of the Three-Compartment Financial Bubble Model under the Mittag-Leffler Operator, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 608, 10.3390/fractalfract7080608 | |
26. | Sumeyra UCAR, Existence Results for a Computer Virus Spreading Model with Atangana-Baleanu Derivative, 2020, 17, 1305-130X, 67, 10.18466/cbayarfbe.716573 | |
27. | Shumaila Javeed, Zain Ul Abdeen, Dumitru Baleanu, Fractional Modeling of Cancer with Mixed Therapies, 2023, 28, 2768-6701, 10.31083/j.fbl2808174 | |
28. | S. Esmaili, M. H. Heydari, M. Razzaghi, A fractional model of tumor growth with a free boundary, 2024, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-024-02325-8 | |
29. | G. M. Vijayalakshmi, M. Ariyanatchi, Vediyappan Govindan, Mustafa Inc, Fractal-fractional modelling of thrombocytopenia influence on pregnant women in the context of dengue infection with Mittag–Leffler decay analysis, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02278-8 | |
30. | Mohammed Althubyani, Sayed Saber, Hyers–Ulam Stability of Fractal–Fractional Computer Virus Models with the Atangana–Baleanu Operator, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 158, 10.3390/fractalfract9030158 | |
31. | Sayed Saber, Emad Solouma, The Generalized Euler Method for Analyzing Zoonotic Disease Dynamics in Baboon–Human Populations, 2025, 17, 2073-8994, 541, 10.3390/sym17040541 | |
32. | Haroon D. S. Adam, Mohammed Althubyani, Safa M. Mirgani, Sayed Saber, An application of Newton’s interpolation polynomials to the zoonotic disease transmission between humans and baboons system based on a time-fractal fractional derivative with a power-law kernel, 2025, 15, 2158-3226, 10.1063/5.0253869 | |
33. | Khadija Tul Kubra, Samra Gulshan, Rooh Ali, The dynamic interactions between tumor carcinogenesis and macrophage activation: an extended mathematical model, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-025-02310-5 | |
34. | Mohammed Althubyani, Haroon D. S. Adam, Ahmad Alalyani, Nidal E. Taha, Khdija O. Taha, Rasmiyah A. Alharbi, Sayed Saber, Understanding zoonotic disease spread with a fractional order epidemic model, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-95943-6 | |
35. | Sayed Saber, Emad Solouma, Mohammed Althubyani, Mohammed Messaoudi, Statistical Insights into Zoonotic Disease Dynamics: Simulation and Control Strategy Evaluation, 2025, 17, 2073-8994, 733, 10.3390/sym17050733 | |
36. | Esmehan Uçar, Tuberculosis disease dynamics with fractal-fractional derivative under the use of real data, 2026, 473, 03770427, 116889, 10.1016/j.cam.2025.116889 | |
37. | Hardik Joshi, Mehmet Yavuz, A novel fractional-order model and analysis of cancer-immune system interaction in an avascular environment with an efficient control mechanism, 2026, 473, 03770427, 116888, 10.1016/j.cam.2025.116888 |