Research article

Bond incident degree indices of stepwise irregular graphs

  • Received: 06 November 2021 Revised: 13 January 2022 Accepted: 16 January 2022 Published: 02 March 2022
  • MSC : 05C07, 05C09, 05C35, 05C75

  • The bond incident degree (BID) index of a graph G is defined as BIDf(G)=uvE(G)f(d(u),d(v)), where d(u) is the degree of a vertex u and f is a non-negative real valued symmetric function of two variables. A graph is stepwise irregular if the degrees of any two of its adjacent vertices differ by exactly one. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound on the maximum degree of stepwise irregular graphs of order n when n2(mod4), and we give upper bounds on BIDf index in terms of the order n and the maximum degree Δ. Moreover, we completely characterize the extremal stepwise irregular graphs of order n with respect to BIDf.

    Citation: Damchaa Adiyanyam, Enkhbayar Azjargal, Lkhagva Buyantogtokh. Bond incident degree indices of stepwise irregular graphs[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8685-8700. doi: 10.3934/math.2022485

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yangtao Wang, Kelin Li . Exponential synchronization of fractional order fuzzy memristor neural networks with time-varying delays and impulses. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(2): 164-179. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025012
    [2] Weisong Zhou, Kaihe Wang, Wei Zhu . Synchronization for discrete coupled fuzzy neural networks with uncertain information via observer-based impulsive control. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(1): 17-31. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024003
    [3] Yanchao He, Yuzhen Bai . Finite-time stability and applications of positive switched linear delayed impulsive systems. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(2): 178-194. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024016
    [4] M. Haripriya, A. Manivannan, S. Dhanasekar, S. Lakshmanan . Finite-time synchronization of delayed complex dynamical networks via sampled-data controller. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(1): 73-84. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025006
    [5] Yunsi Yang, Jun-e Feng, Lei Jia . Recent advances of finite-field networks. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(3): 244-255. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023021
    [6] Gani Stamov, Ekaterina Gospodinova, Ivanka Stamova . Practical exponential stability with respect to hmanifolds of discontinuous delayed Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with variable impulsive perturbations. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2021, 1(1): 26-34. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2021003
    [7] Hongyu Ma, Dadong Tian, Mei Li, Chao Zhang . Reachable set estimation for 2-D switched nonlinear positive systems with impulsive effects and bounded disturbances described by the Roesser model. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(2): 152-162. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024014
    [8] Hongwei Zheng, Yujuan Tian . Exponential stability of time-delay systems with highly nonlinear impulses involving delays. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(1): 103-120. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025008
    [9] Tengda Wei, Xiang Xie, Xiaodi Li . Persistence and periodicity of survival red blood cells model with time-varying delays and impulses. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2021, 1(1): 12-25. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2021002
    [10] Lusong Ding, Weiwei Sun . Neuro-adaptive finite-time control of fractional-order nonlinear systems with multiple objective constraints. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(4): 355-369. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023029
  • The bond incident degree (BID) index of a graph G is defined as BIDf(G)=uvE(G)f(d(u),d(v)), where d(u) is the degree of a vertex u and f is a non-negative real valued symmetric function of two variables. A graph is stepwise irregular if the degrees of any two of its adjacent vertices differ by exactly one. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound on the maximum degree of stepwise irregular graphs of order n when n2(mod4), and we give upper bounds on BIDf index in terms of the order n and the maximum degree Δ. Moreover, we completely characterize the extremal stepwise irregular graphs of order n with respect to BIDf.



    Currently, the study of non-linear fractional differential equations (NLFDEs) play a key role in the arena of solitary wave theory. The analysis of such models [1,2,3], is significant to understand the everyday physical phenomena in non-linear evolution models. Nowadays technological developments have exposed that, fractional calculus have developed as a dominant instrument in numerous fields of applied sciences and engineering [4,5]. A big advantage of fractional models is that their narrative is more suitable than the ordinary models [6]. These properties motivate our interest to yield consideration in a noteworthy and appropriate model for (4+1)-dimensional fractional-order non-linear Fokas equation. Non-linear Fokas equation is one of the well-known physical models [7,8] that defines a huge diversity of phenomena, such as non-linear optics, fluid mechanics, condensed matter, and plasmas. The properties of fractional derivatives are complex, therefore, it is not easy to solve fractional-order problems using novel derivatives. As for as we know, there is no regular scheme to answer the fractional-order non-linear models. A number of novel arithmetical and analytical schemes [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], are suggested for fractional-order models by using ordinary calculus, however, it's static task for the scholars. Fokas [21] improved the Lax couples of integrable non-linear KP and DS equations, and consequent the simple wave equation. In wave systems, DS and KP models are proposed to define the surface and internal waves in canals with altering depth and breadth [22,23]. The Fokas equation has many applications in quantum mechanics and plasma physics to explore the transmission of solitons. The important applications of the Fokas equation lie in real world problems considered as a higher dimensional integrable model in mathematical physics. The importance of the Fokas equation suggests that the idea of complexifying time can be investigated in the context of modern field theories via the existence of integrable nonlinear equations in four spatial dimensions involving complex time [24,25]. In this paper, we deal the non-linear fractional-order (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation (FE),

    42αutαxα3αx3α(uy)+αxα(3uy3)+12αuxαuy+12uαxα(uy)62uzw=0, (1.1)

    where u is a function and wave velocity physically also 0<α<1. While α=1 then Eq (1.1) converts to simple (4+1)-dimensional FE. Assume this general Eq (1.1) to designate the gesture of waves in multifaceted broadcasting. It shows the distortion or dispersion of the external wave. So, various types of solution of FE will offer us proposals to instruct the multifaceted system of DS and KD models. Also, according above-stated evidences and the significant uses of the FE, it is crucial to discover the innovative solitons solutions of Eq (1.1). In recent times, physicists and mathematicians have great concern to discover the Eq (1.1), such as Zhang et al. [26] applied the sub-equation method (SM) to determine the solution of Eq (1.1) using some derivative in the form of rational, trigonometric, and functions of hyperbolic. Zhang et al. [27] utilized the new SM, in fractional form of (G0=G)-expansion scheme. Choi et al. [28] applied the SM using different schemes and attained the novel analytical solutions of Eq (1.1). Zhang [29] used Exp-function method to explore the solitary wave solution of Eq (1.1). Zhao et al.[30] suggested the improved fractional (G0=G)-expansion scheme and acquire the exact solutions. Solitons are used to denote the particle-like properties of non-linear pulses. The significance of solitons is due to their existence in a variety of non-linear differential equations representing many complex nonlinear phenomena, such as acoustics, optics, convictive fluids, condensed matter, and solid-state physics. There are numerous type of solitary wave and solitons solutions [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].

    The study of non-linear PDEs has become much significant in pure and applied mathematics from many years. Through the aid of computer technology, the new horizons are opened in the field of applied sciences for the mathematicians. There has been a growing interest in PDEs which are frequently used in engineering sciences and mathematical physics. The PDEs arise commonly in biological and physical sciences as well. Many problems of physics, chemistry, and engineering lead naturally to the resolution of PDEs. In the light of the literature review, there are various models of PDEs, particularly, PDEs whose exact solutions need to be discussed. The application of non-linear PDEs in mathematical modeling has induced a motivation for research in the field of differential problems.

    The prominent concern of this existing study is to utilize the novel meanings of fractional-order derivative, named conformable derivative, for space-time fractional-order (4+1)-dimensional FE. As our best knowledge the considered methods have not been utilized for such model in the literature. Several type of solutions in the form of bright soliton, dark soliton, combined dark-bright soliton, periodic soliton and general solitary waves solutions of FE are missing in the literature. As compared our obtained results with previous existing results in literature, some of results are not available in literature with other methods lies in [42,43,44,45,46]. In this article our goal is to discover novel various soliton solutions of (4+1)-dimensional fractional-order non-linear Fokas equation using Sardar-subequation [47,48] and new extended hyperbolic function method [49,50,51,52]. As a result, novel soliton solutions are more generalized and in different form which have never been obtained before. To the best of our knowledge, these novel properties and interesting structures are investigated for the first time in (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation. Our results enrich the variety of the dynamics of higher-dimensional non-linear wave field. It is hoped that these results will provide some valuable information in the higher-dimensional non-linear field.

    The layouts of this paper are: Section 2 contains the governing model. Section 3 consists on the analysis of the methods. In section 4 the applications of the proposed methods are presented. Section 5 describes results and discussion and conclusion of this work is presented in section 6.

    Progress in fractional-calculus is more beneficial for scholars to express the physical phenomena with novel techniques. Newly, Caputo et al. [53] modified the Caputo derivative [54], Atangana-Baleanu (AB) presented a novel fractional derivative (FD), known as AB derivative [55]. In 2014, Khalil et al. [56] proposed a conformable derivative. The Caputo, Riemann-Liouville (RL) [57,58], and further derivatives do not follow the simple instructions, which are supposed by Newtonian kind simple derivative. Such as:

    (1) For RL derivative, DαtP0, P is any constant.

    (2) For Caputo and RL derivative,

    Dαt(f(t)g(t))f(t)Dαtg(t)+g(t)Dαtf(t).

    (3) For Caputo and RL derivative,

    Dαtf(t)g(t)g(t)Dαtf(t)f(t)Dαtg(t)g(t)2.

    Definition 2.1: [56] The FD of a function k=k(t):[0,) of order ς>0 is described as

    Dςtk(t)=limϵ0k(ϵt1ς+t)k(t)ϵ,0<ς1. (2.1)

    At ς=1, the fractional-order derivative converted to integer-order derivative.

    Theorem 2.2: We have the following properties when ς(0,1] and k,k1 are conformable functions as follows:

    Dςtk(t)=t1ςdk(t)dt.

    Dςtth=htnς,hR.

    Dςtc=0, constant functions k(t)=0.

    Dςt(p1k(t)+p2k1(t))=p1Dςtk(t)+p2Dςtk1(t),p1,p2R.

    Dςt(k(t)k1(t))=k(t)Dςtk1(t)+k1(t)Dςth(t).

    Dςtk(t)k1(t)=k1(t)Dςtk(t)Dςtk1(t)k1(t)2.

    Dςt(kok1)(t)=t1ςk1(t)k(k1(t)).

    In this section, we have analyzed two methods that are applied to construct novel solitons solutions of the given model.

    In this section, we describe the offered methods to solve the fractional model, we assume the proposed model as

    H(u,αutα,αuxα,αuyα,αuzα,αuwα,2αut2α,2αux2α,2αuy2α,....)=0,

    where u is a function. Using following wave transformations in (3.1)

    u(x,y,z,w,t)=U(η),η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wααvtαα,

    here v is frequency while β1,β2,β3,β4 are wave lengths, respectively. Using (3.2) into (3.1), we yield an ODE as follows

    P(U,U,U,...)=0. (3.1)

    Where U, U and U are the first, second and the third derivatives of U, respectively w. r. t η and so on.

    U(η)=Mj=0FjΦi(η), (3.2)

    where Fj are constants and Φ(η) accept the (3.7) as follows

    (Φ(η))2=ϵ+δΦ2(η)+Φ4(η), (3.3)

    here ϵ and δ are constants.

    Case 1: When δ>0andϵ=0, then

    Φ±1(η)=±δpqsechpq(δη),
    Φ±2(η)=±δpqcschpq(δη),

    where, sechpq(η)=2peη+qeη,cschpq(η)=2peηqeη.

    Case 2: When δ<0andϵ=0, then

    Φ±3(η)=±δpqsecpq(δη),
    Φ±4(η)=±δpqcscpq(δη),

    where, secpq(η)=2peιη+qeιη,cscpq(η)=2ιpeιηqeιη.

    Case 3: When δ<0andϵ=δ24b, then

    Φ±5(η)=±δ2tanhpq(δ2η),
    Φ±6(η)=±δ2cothpq(δ2η),
    Φ±7(η)=±δ2(tanhpq(2δη)±ιpqsechpq(2δη)),
    Φ±8(η)=±δ2(cothpq(2δη)±pqcschpq(2δη)),
    Φ±9(η)=±δ8(tanhpq(δ8η)+cothpq(δ8η)),

    where, tanhpq(η)=peηqeηpeη+qeη,cothpq(η)=peη+qeηpeηqeη.

    Case 4: When δ>0andϵ=δ24, then

    Φ±10(η)=±δ2tanpq(δ2η),
    Φ±11(η)=±δ2cotpq(δ2η),
    Φ±12(η)=±δ2(tanpq(2δη)±pqsecpq(2δη)),
    Φ±13(η)=±δ2(cotpq(2δη)±pqcscpq(2δη)),
    Φ±14(η)=±δ8(tanpq(δ8η)+cotpq(δ8η)),

    where, tanpq(η)=ιpeιηqeιηpeιη+qeιη,cotpq(η)=ιpeιη+qeιηpeιηqeιη.

    The new EHFM has two phases as follows.

    Form 1: Consider FPDE is taken in (3.1) and using the wave transformations in (3.2) to obtain (3.3). Assume (3.3) admits the solution as follows:

    U(η)=Mj=0FjΦi(η), (3.4)

    where Fj are constants and Φ(η) accept the (3.7)

    dΦdη=ΦΛ+ΔΦ2,Λ,ΘR. (3.5)

    On balancing in (3.3) the value of N is obtained. Inserting (3.6) into (3.3) along with (3.7), yields a set of equations. By resolving the equations, we get the solutions that accepts (3.5), as

    Set 1: When Λ>0 and Δ>0,

    Φ(η)=ΛΔcsch(Λ(η+η0)). (3.6)

    Set 2: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,

    Φ(η)=ΛΔsec(Λ(η+η0)). (3.7)

    Set 3: When Λ>0 and Δ<0,

    Φ(η)=ΛΔsech(Λ(η+η0)). (3.8)

    Set 4: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,

    Φ(η)=ΛΔcsc(Λ(η+η0)). (3.9)

    Set 5: When Λ>0 and Δ=0,

    Φ(η)=exp(Λ(η+η0)). (3.10)

    Set 6: When Λ<0 and Δ=0,

    Φ(η)=cos(Λ(η+η0))+ιsin(Λ(η+η0)). (3.11)

    Set 7: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,

    Φ(η)=±1(Δ(η+η0)). (3.12)

    Set 8: When Λ=0 and Δ<0,

    Φ(η)=±ι(Δ(η+η0)). (3.13)

    Form 2: Adopting the procedure as earlier, consider that Φ(η) accept the following ODE as

    dΦdη=Λ+ΔΦ2,Λ,ΔR. (3.14)

    Substituting (3.6) into (3.3) along with (3.16), gets a set of equations with the values of Fj(j=1,2,3,...M). We assume that (3.5) has solutions as

    Set 1: When ΛΔ>0,

    Φ(η)=sn(Λ)ΛΔtan(ΛΔ(η+η0)). (3.15)

    Set 2: When ΛΔ>0,

    Φ(η)=sn(Λ)ΛΔcot(ΛΔ(η+η0)). (3.16)

    Set 3: When ΛΔ<0,

    Φ(η)=sn(Λ)ΛΔtanh(ΛΔ(η+η0)). (3.17)

    Set 4: When ΛΔ<0,

    Φ(η)=sn(Λ)ΛΔcoth(ΛΔ(η+η0)). (3.18)

    Set 5: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,

    Φ(η)=1Δ(η+η0). (3.19)

    Set 6: When ΛR and Δ=0,

    Φ(η)=Λ(η+η0). (3.20)

    Note: sn is well-known sign function.

    Here, we construct the solitons solutions of fractional-order Fokas equation. The Eq (1.1) with Eq (3.2) becomes

    β1β2(β21β22)U+(4β1v+6β3β4)U6β1β2U2=0. (4.1)

    Now, we apply the SSM to solve the (4+1)-dimensional FE. Using balance method on (4.1), gets M=2, so (3.6) decreases to

    U(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, (4.2)

    where F0, F1 and F2 are constants. Inserting (4.2) into (4.1) and comparing the coefficients of Φ(η) to zero, we get a set of equations in F0,F1,F2,ϵandv.

    Working on the set of equations, yields

    F0=F0,F1=0,F2=(β21β22),
    ϵ=2δβ21F02δβ22F03F20(β21β22)2,
    v=2δβ31β2+2δβ1β323β3β4+6β1β2F02β1. (4.3)

    Case 1: When δ>0andϵ=0, then

    u±1,1(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±pqδsechpq(δ(η)))2, (4.4)
    u±1,2(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±pqδcschpq(δ(η)))2. (4.5)

    Case 2: When δ<0andϵ=0, then

    u±1,3(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±pqδsecpq(δ(η)))2, (4.6)
    u±1,4(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±pqδcscpq(δ(η)))2. (4.7)

    Case 3: When δ<0andϵ=δ24b, then

    u±1,5(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2tanhpq(δ2(η))2, (4.8)
    u±1,6(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2cothpq(δ2(η))2, (4.9)
    u±1,7(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2(tanhpq(2δ(η))±ιpqsechpq(2δ(η))))2, (4.10)
    u±1,8(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2(cothpq(2δ(η))±pqcschpq(2δ(η))))2, (4.11)
    u±1,9(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ8(tanhpq(δ8(η))+cothpq(δ8(η))))2. (4.12)

    Case 4: When δ>0andϵ=δ24, then

    u±1,10(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2tanpq(δ2(η)))2, (4.13)
    u±1,11(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2cotpq(δ2(η)))2, (4.14)
    u±1,12(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2(tanpq(2δ(η))±pqsecpq(2δ(η))))2, (4.15)
    u±1,13(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ2(cotpq(2δ(η))±pqcscpq(2δ(η))))2, (4.16)
    u±1,14(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21β22)(±δ8(tanpq(δ8(η))+cotpq(δ8(η))))2. (4.17)

    Form 1: Now, we apply the new EHFM to solve the (4+1)-dimensional FE. Using balance method in (4.1), yields M=2, so (3.6) changes to

    U(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, (4.18)

    where F0, F1 and F2 are constants. Inserting (4.18) into (4.1) and associating the constants of Φ(η) with zero, we yield the equations in F0,F1,F2,ΛandΔ.

    On working set of equations, we achieve

    F0=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2,F1=0,
    F2=F2,Λ=2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22).
    Δ=F2(β21β22). (4.19)

    Set 1: When Λ>0 and Δ>0,

    u1(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2csch(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.20)

    Set 2: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,

    u2(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2sec(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.21)

    Set 3: When Λ>0 and Δ<0,

    u3(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2sech(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.22)

    Set 4: When Λ<0 and Δ<0,

    u4(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2csc(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.23)

    Set 5: When Λ>0 and Δ=0,

    u5(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(exp(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.24)

    Set 6: When Λ<0 and Δ=0,

    u6(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(cos(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0))+ιsin(2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21β22)(η+η0)))2. (4.25)

    Set 7: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,

    u7(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(±1(F2(β21β22)(η+η0))2. (4.26)

    Set 8: When Λ=0 and Δ<0,

    u8(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(±ι(F2(β21β22)(η+η0))2, (4.27)

    where η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wααvtαα.

    Form 2: Utilizing balance method in (4.1), gives M=2, so (3.6) converts to

    u(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, (4.28)

    where F0, F1 and F2 are numbers. Inserting (4.28) into (4.1) and associating the constants of Φ(η) with zero, we attain set of equations in F0,F1,F2,Λ,andΔ.

    On working the set of equations, we achieve

    F0=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2,F1=0,
    F2=(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22),Λ=Λ,
    Δ=(2vβ1+3β3β4)22Λβ31β22Λβ1β32. (4.29)

    Set 1: When ΛΔ>0,

    u9(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(χ2Λ2β1β2(β21β22)(2vβ1+3β3β4)2tan((2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β22β1β32)(η+η0)))2. (4.30)

    Set 2: When ΛΔ>0,

    u10(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(χ2Λ2β1β2(β21β22)(2vβ1+3β3β4)2cot((2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β22β1β32)(η+η0)))2. (4.31)

    Set 3: When ΛΔ<0,

    u11(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(χ2Λ2β1β2(β21β22)(2vβ1+3β3β4)2tanh((2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β22β1β32)(η+η0)))2. (4.32)

    Set 4: When ΛΔ<0,

    u12(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(χ2Λ2β1β2(β21β22)(2vβ1+3β3β4)2coth((2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β22β1β32)(η+η0)))2. (4.33)

    Set 5: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,

    u13(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(1(2vβ1+3β3β4)22Λβ31β22Λβ1β32(η+η0))2. (4.34)

    Set 6: When ΛR and Δ=0,

    u14(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β42(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21β22)(Λ(η+η0))2, (4.35)

    where χ=sgn(Λ), η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wααvtαα.

    Herein study, we have successfully built various solitons solutions for the (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation applying SSM and new EHFM. The proposed methods are measured most efficient techniques in this field and that are not applied to this model previous. To analyze physically, 3D and 2D graphs of some selected results are added with suitable parameters. These obtained solutions determine their applications in propagation to carry information since solitons have the competency to mobile long spaces without drop and shifting their systems. In this study, we added only certain figures (see Figures 17) to dodge overloading the document. Absolutely the achieved results are fresh and different from that reported results.

    Figure 1.  (a) 3D graph of (4.4) with F0=1.75, β1=1.65, β2=1.74, β3=1.91, β4=1.65, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.8, v=1.2. (a-1) 2D plot of (4.4) with t=1.
    Figure 2.  (b) 3D graph of (4.8) with F0=1.5, β1=1.5, β2=1.64, β3=1.81, β4=1.55, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.8, v=1.1. (b-1) 2D plot of (4.8) with t=1.
    Figure 3.  (c) 3D graph of (4.10) with F0=1.77, β1=1.95, β2=1.24, β3=1.51, β4=1.65, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.65, v=1.4. (c-1) 2D plot of (4.10) with t=1.
    Figure 4.  (d) 3D graph of (4.17) with F0=1.37, β1=1.75, β2=2.44, β3=1.71, β4=1.55, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.75, v=1.6. (d-1) 2D graph of (4.17) with t=1.
    Figure 5.  (e) 3D graph of (4.22) with F0=1.4, β2=0.45, β2=2.54, β3=1.91, β4=1.15, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.65, v=0.6. (e-1) 2D plot of (4.22) with t=1.
    Figure 6.  (f) 3D plot of (4.30) with F0=1.2, β1=1.79, β2=1.47, β3=1.74, β4=1.65, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, χ=1.2, δ=0.7, v=1.2. (f-1) 2D plot of (4.30) as t=1.
    Figure 7.  (g) 3D graph of (4.32) with F0=1.5, β1=1.25, β2=1.34, β3=2.85, β4=1.95, p=0.98, q=0.95, α=0.99, δ=0.45, χ=1.2, v=0.77. (g-1) 2D plot of (4.32) with t=1.

    We have constructed novel multi solitons solutions for the nonlinear fractional-order Fokas equation by applying the SSM and new EHFM. From results we obtained multi solitons solutions such as dark, singular, bright and periodic solitons. By the purpose of describe the behavior of achieved solutions of the model, we plotted some particular solutions by assigning the suitable values to the parameters involved. The obtained results may have much inspiration in various fields of physical sciences. From obtained results, we can know that the under study techniques are proficient, consistent and beneficial for rescuing the exact solutions of nonlinear FPDEs in a wide range. Also, these results are supportive to learn the dynamics of nonlinear waves in optics, hydrodynamics, solid state physics, and plasma. In future, we anticipate that this study is a step towards the solutions of such kinds of higher dimensional problems by using the proposed methods in this study. This work may be extended for a novel fractional order Fokas dynamical model in future.

    The work in this paper has been supported by the Polish National Science Centre under the grant OPUS 14 No. 2017/27/B/ST8/01330.

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.



    [1] A. Ali, D. Dimitrov, On the extremal graphs with respect to bond incident degree indices, Discrete Appl. Math., 238 (2018), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2017.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2017.12.007
    [2] A. Ali, Z. Raza, A. A. Bhatti, Extremal pentagonal chains with respect to bond incident degree indices, Can. J. Chem., 94 (2016), 870–876. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2016-0308 doi: 10.1139/cjc-2016-0308
    [3] A. Ali, Z. Raza, A. A. Bhatti, Bond incident degree (BID) indices for some nanostructures, Optoelectron. Adv. Mat., 10 (2016), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.5184/classicalj.112.1.0108 doi: 10.5184/classicalj.112.1.0108
    [4] B. Bollobás, P. Erdös, A. Sarkar, Extremal graphs for weights, Discrete Math., 200 (1999), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(98)00320-3 doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(98)00320-3
    [5] B. Borovicanin, K. C. Das, B. Furtula, I. Gutman, Bounds for Zagreb indices, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 78 (2017), 17–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.056 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.056
    [6] L. Buyantogtokh, E. Azjargal, B. Horoldagva, S. Dorjsembe, D. Adiyanyam, On the maximum size of stepwise irregular graphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 392 (2021), 125683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125683 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125683
    [7] L. Buyantogtokh, B. Horoldagva, K. C. Das, On reduced second Zagreb index, J. Comb. Optim., 39 (2020), 776–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00518-7 doi: 10.1007/s10878-019-00518-7
    [8] K. C. Das, I. Gutman, Some properties of the second Zagreb index, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 52 (2004), 103–112.
    [9] K. C. Das, I. Gutman, B. Horoldagva, Comparison between Zagreb indices and Zagreb coindices of trees, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68 (2012), 189–198.
    [10] M. Enteshari, B. Taeri, Extremal Zagreb indices of graphs of order n with p pendent vertices, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 86 (2021), 17–28.
    [11] S. Filipovski, New bounds for the first Zagreb index, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 85 (2021), 303–312.
    [12] B. Furtula, I. Gutman, S. Ediz, On difference of Zagreb indices, Discr. Appl. Math., 178 (2014), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2014.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2014.06.011
    [13] I. Gutman, Degree-based topological indices, Croat. Chem. Acta., 86 (2013), 351–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.5562/cca2294 doi: 10.5562/cca2294
    [14] I. Gutman, Multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees, Bull. Int. Math. Virt. Inst., 1 (2011), 13–19.
    [15] I. Gutman, Stepwise irregular graphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 325 (2018), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.12.045 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.12.045
    [16] I. Gutman, Geometric approach to degree-based topological indices: Sombor indices, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 86 (2021), 11–16.
    [17] I. Gutman, Sombor index-one year later, Bulletin Classe de Sciences Mathematiques et Naturelles, Sciences Mathematiques, 45 (2020), 43–55. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27053354.
    [18] B. Horoldagva, K. C. Das, On Zagreb indices of graphs, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 85 (2021), 295–301.
    [19] B. Horoldagva, I. Gutman, On some vertex-degree-based graph invariants, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 65 (2011), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1257059 doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1257059
    [20] B. Horoldagva, C. Xu, On Sombor index of graphs, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 86 (2021), 703–713.
    [21] B. Horoldagva, C. Xu, L. Buyantogtokh, Sh. Dorjsembe, Extremal graphs with respect to the multiplicative sum Zagreb index, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 84 (2020), 773–786.
    [22] J. B. Liu, A. Q. Baig, M. Imran, W. Khalid, M. Saeed, M. R.Farahani, Computation of bond incident degree (BID) indices of complex structures in drugs, Eurasian Chem. Commun., 2 (2020), 672–679. https://doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2020.6.4 doi: 10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2020.6.4
    [23] H. Liu, L. You, Z. Tang, J. B. Liu, On the reduced Sombor index and its applications, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 86 (2021), 729–753.
    [24] J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Sharp upper bounds on multiplicative Zagreb indices, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68 (2012), 231–240.
    [25] Y. Rao, A. Aslam, M. U. Noor, A. O. Almatroud, Z. Shao, Bond incident degree indices of catacondensed pentagonal systems, Complexity, 2020, 493576. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4935760 doi: 10.1155/2020/4935760
    [26] T. Réti, T. Došlić, A. Ali, On the Sombor index of graphs, Contrib. Math., 3 (2021), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.47443/cm.2021.0006 doi: 10.47443/cm.2021.0006
    [27] Y. Tang, D. B. West, B. Zhou, Extremal problems for degree-based topological indices, Discrete Appl. Math., 203 (2016), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.011
    [28] K. Xu, K. C. Das, Trees, unicyclic and bicyclic graphs extremal with respect to multiplicative sum Zagreb index, MATCH-Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68 (2012), 257–272.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Mohammed M.M. Jaradat, Asim Zafar, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, Adel A. Elmandouh, Mohammed Sallah, Bifurcation of some new traveling wave solutions for the time–space M- fractional MEW equation via three altered methods, 2022, 41, 22113797, 105896, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105896
    2. Imran Siddique, Arshad M. Mirza, Kausar Shahzadi, M. Ali Akbar, Fahd Jarad, Yusuf Gurefe, Diverse Precise Traveling Wave Solutions Possessing Beta Derivative of the Fractional Differential Equations Arising in Mathematical Physics, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/5613708
    3. Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, M. Ali Akbar, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, Asim Zafar, Yusuf Gurefe, Diverse Exact Soliton Solutions of the Time Fractional Clannish Random Walker’s Parabolic Equation via Dual Novel Techniques, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/1680560
    4. Neslihan Ozdemir, M-truncated soliton solutions of the fractional (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation, 2023, 13, 2146-5703, 123, 10.11121/ijocta.2023.1321
    5. Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Fahd Jarad, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, Adel A. Elmandouh, Novel precise solutions and bifurcation of traveling wave solutions for the nonlinear fractional (3 + 1)-dimensional WBBM equation, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S021797922350011X
    6. Muhammad Raheel, Asim Zafar, Adem Cevikel, Hadi Rezazadeh, Ahmet Bekir, Exact wave solutions of truncated M-fractional new hamiltonian amplitude equation through two analytical techniques, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979223500030
    7. Wael W. Mohammed, Clemente Cesarano, Farah M. Al-Askar, Solutions to the (4+1)-Dimensional Time-Fractional Fokas Equation with M-Truncated Derivative, 2022, 11, 2227-7390, 194, 10.3390/math11010194
    8. Sadaf Irshad, Muhammad Shakeel, Aysha Bibi, Muhammad Sajjad, Kottakkran Sooppy Nisar, A comparative study of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation in optics, 2023, 37, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984922502190
    9. Riaz Ur Rahman, Waqas Ali Faridi, Magda Abd El-Rahman, Aigul Taishiyeva, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Emad Ahmad Az-Zo’bi, The Sensitive Visualization and Generalized Fractional Solitons’ Construction for Regularized Long-Wave Governing Model, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 136, 10.3390/fractalfract7020136
    10. Sadaf Irshad, Muhammad Shakeel, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Sajjad, A Comparative Study for Fractional Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation in Optics, 2022, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4112847
    11. Muath Awadalla, Aigul Taishiyeva, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Jihan Alahmadi, Abdullah A. Zaagan, Ahmet Bekir, Exact analytical soliton solutions of the M-fractional Akbota equation, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64328-6
    12. Umair Asghar, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Ali Akgül, Novel solitonic structure, Hamiltonian dynamics and lie symmetry algebra of biofilm, 2024, 9, 26668181, 100653, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100653
    13. M. Raheel, Asim Zafar, Jian-Guo Liu, New periodic-wave, periodic-cross-kink wave, three wave and other analytical wave solitons of new (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation, 2024, 139, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04831-3
    14. Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Ravi P. Agarwal, Iver Brevik, Mohamed Abdelwahed, Artion Kashuri, Majeed A. Yousif, On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 553, 10.3390/sym16050553
    15. Abdullah A. Zaagan, Ali Altalbe, Ahmet Bekir, Dynamical analysis and soliton solutions of a variety of quantum nonlinear Zakharov–Kuznetsov models via three analytical techniques, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1427827
    16. Fazal Badshah, Kalim U. Tariq, Mustafa Inc, Rizwan Javed, On soliton solutions of Fokas dynamical model via analytical approaches, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-023-06198-2
    17. Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi, Modelling of KdV-Soliton Through Fractional Action and Emergence of Lump Waves, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01141-6
    18. Kai Fan, Jiankang Liu, Jinbin Wang, Chen Jin, Evolution Analysis of Strain Waves for the Fractal Nonlinear Propagation Equation of Longitudinal Waves in a Rod, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 586, 10.3390/fractalfract7080586
    19. Khush Bukht Mehdi, Zubia Mehdi, Shamaila Samreen, Imran Siddique, Adel A. Elmandouh, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, M.S. Osman, Novel exact traveling wave solutions of the space-time fractional Sharma Tasso-Olver equation via three reliable methods, 2024, 11, 26668181, 100784, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100784
    20. Naeem Ullah, Hamood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Hameed Ashraf, Asma Taskeen, Dynamic study of Clannish Random Walker’s parabolic equation via extended direct algebraic method, 2024, 56, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05767-9
    21. Asim Zafar, M. Raheel, Ali M. Mahnashi, Ahmet Bekir, Mohamed R. Ali, A.S. Hendy, Exploring the new soliton solutions to the nonlinear M-fractional evolution equations in shallow water by three analytical techniques, 2023, 54, 22113797, 107092, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107092
    22. Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi, Ahmet Bekir, Discovery of New Exact Wave Solutions to the M-Fractional Complex Three Coupled Maccari’s System by Sardar Sub-Equation Scheme, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1567, 10.3390/sym15081567
    23. Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Computational soliton solutions for the fractional nonlinear dynamical model arising in water wave, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102950, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102950
    24. Haitham Qawaqneh, Jalil Manafian, Mohammed Alharthi, Yasser Alrashedi, Stability Analysis, Modulation Instability, and Beta-Time Fractional Exact Soliton Solutions to the Van der Waals Equation, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2257, 10.3390/math12142257
    25. Asim Zafar, M. Raheel, Khalid K. Ali, Ahmet Bekir, New optical wave solutions of M-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger’s complex hyperbolic model by an efficient method, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924502257
    26. Haitham Qawaqneh, Ali Altalbe, Ahmet Bekir, Kalim U. Tariq, Investigation of soliton solutions to the truncated M-fractional (3+1)-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation with periodic potential, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 23410, 10.3934/math.20241138
    27. Boyu Liu, Wenyan Wang, An efficient numerical scheme in reproducing kernel space for space fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 33286, 10.3934/math.20241588
    28. Abdulrahman Alomair, Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, Ahmet Bekir, New Abundant Analytical Solitons to the Fractional Mathematical Physics Model via Three Distinct Schemes, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3691, 10.3390/math12233691
    29. Abdulrahman Alomair, Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, Ahmet Bekir, Exploration of Soliton Solutions to the Special Korteweg–De Vries Equation with a Stability Analysis and Modulation Instability, 2024, 13, 2227-7390, 54, 10.3390/math13010054
    30. Mahmoud Soliman, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen Badra, Islam Samir, Mostafa Eslami, Novel optical soliton solutions using improved modified extended tanh function method for fractional beta time derivative (2+1)-dimensional Schrödinger equation, 2024, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984925500848
    31. M. B. Almatrafi, Solitary Wave Solutions to a Fractional-Order Fokas Equation via the Improved Modified Extended Tanh-Function Approach, 2024, 13, 2227-7390, 109, 10.3390/math13010109
    32. Hongwei Ma, Riaz Ur Rahman, Solomon Manukure, Dynamical analysis and bifurcations in a fractional integrable equation, 2025, 125, 11100168, 600, 10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.138
    33. Sevil Çulha Ünal, Solutions of the Fractional Combined KdV-mKdV Equation Using the Special Generalized Hyperbolic and Trigonometric Functions, 2025, 14, 1304-7981, 1, 10.54187/jnrs.1619374
    34. Shami A. M. Alsallami, Exploring the interaction between lump, stripe and double-stripe, and periodic wave solutions of the Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky–Kaup–Kupershmidt system, 2025, 14, 2192-8029, 10.1515/nleng-2025-0129
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1988) PDF downloads(96) Cited by(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog