On stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrodinger equation

Jiayin Liu; Jiayin Liu

doi:10.3934/math.2020405

AIMS Mathematics

2020, Volume 5, Issue 6: 6298-6312. doi: 10.3934/math.2020405

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

On stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrodinger equation

Jiayin Liu ^,

School of Mathematics and Information Science, North Minzu University, Yinchuan, 750021, China

Received: 15 June 2020 Accepted: 27 July 2020 Published: 06 August 2020
MSC : 35Q55, 35B44

In this paper, we consider the stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrödinger equation

$i\partial_t\psi = (-\Delta)^s\psi- |x|^{-b}|\psi|^{2p}\psi.$ By applying the profile decomposition of bounded sequences in

$H^s$ and variational methods, in the

$L^2$ -subcritical case, i.e.,

$0 \lt p \lt \frac{4s-2b}{N}$ , we prove that the standing waves are orbitally stable. In the

$L^2$ -critical case, i.e.,

$p = \frac{4s-2b}{N}$ , we show that the standing waves are strongly unstable by blow-up.

Keywords:

inhomogeneous fractional Schrödinger equation,
stability,
instability

Citation: Jiayin Liu. On stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrodinger equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6298-6312. doi: 10.3934/math.2020405

Related Papers:

[1]	Qiaoping Li, Sanyang Liu . Predefined-time vector-polynomial-based synchronization among a group of chaotic systems and its application in secure information transmission. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11005-11028. doi: 10.3934/math.2021639
[2]	Minghung Lin, Yiyou Hou, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik . The global attractive sets and synchronization of a fractional-order complex dynamical system. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3523-3541. doi: 10.3934/math.2023179
[3]	Sukono, Siti Hadiaty Yuningsih, Endang Rusyaman, Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan, Aceng Sambas . Investigation of chaos behavior and integral sliding mode control on financial risk model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18377-18392. doi: 10.3934/math.20221012
[4]	Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi, Saima Rashid, S. K. Elagan . Short-memory discrete fractional difference equation wind turbine model and its inferential control of a chaotic permanent magnet synchronous transformer in time-scale analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19097-19120. doi: 10.3934/math.2023975
[5]	Omar Kahouli, Imane Zouak, Ma'mon Abu Hammad, Adel Ouannas . Chaos, control and synchronization in discrete time computer virus system with fractional orders. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 13594-13621. doi: 10.3934/math.2025612
[6]	Pratap Anbalagan, Evren Hincal, Raja Ramachandran, Dumitru Baleanu, Jinde Cao, Michal Niezabitowski . A Razumikhin approach to stability and synchronization criteria for fractional order time delayed gene regulatory networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4526-4555. doi: 10.3934/math.2021268
[7]	Pratap Anbalagan, Evren Hincal, Raja Ramachandran, Dumitru Baleanu, Jinde Cao, Chuangxia Huang, Michal Niezabitowski . Delay-coupled fractional order complex Cohen-Grossberg neural networks under parameter uncertainty: Synchronization stability criteria. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2844-2873. doi: 10.3934/math.2021172
[8]	Xinna Mao, Hongwei Feng, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik . Dynamical analysis and boundedness for a generalized chaotic Lorenz model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19719-19742. doi: 10.3934/math.20231005
[9]	Canhong Long, Zuozhi Liu, Can Ma . Synchronization dynamics in fractional-order FitzHugh–Nagumo neural networks with time-delayed coupling. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8673-8687. doi: 10.3934/math.2025397
[10]	Honglei Yin, Bo Meng, Zhen Wang . Disturbance observer-based adaptive sliding mode synchronization control for uncertain chaotic systems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23655-23673. doi: 10.3934/math.20231203

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrödinger equation

$i\partial_t\psi = (-\Delta)^s\psi- |x|^{-b}|\psi|^{2p}\psi.$ By applying the profile decomposition of bounded sequences in

$H^s$ and variational methods, in the

$L^2$ -subcritical case, i.e.,

$0 \lt p \lt \frac{4s-2b}{N}$ , we prove that the standing waves are orbitally stable. In the

$L^2$ -critical case, i.e.,

$p = \frac{4s-2b}{N}$ , we show that the standing waves are strongly unstable by blow-up.

1. Introduction

Since pioneering works of Pecora and Carroll's ^[1], chaos synchronization and control have turned a hot topic and received much attention in various research areas. A number of literatures shows that chaos synchronization can be widely used in physics, medicine, biology, quantum neuron and engineering science, particularly in secure communication and telecommunications ^[1,2,3]. In order to realize synchronization, experts have proposed lots of methods, including complete synchronization and $Q$ - $S$ synchronization ^[4,5], adaptive synchronization ^[6], lag synchronization^[7,8], phase synchronization ^[9], observer-based synchronization ^[10], impulsive synchronization ^[11], generalized synchronization ^[12,13], lag projective synchronization ^[14,15], cascade synchronization et al ^{[16,17,18,19,20]}. Among them, the cascade synchronization method is a very effective algorithm, which is characterized by reproduction of signals in the original chaotic system to monitor the synchronized motions.

It is know that, because of the complexity of fractional differential equations, synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems is more difficult but interesting than that of integer-order systems. Experts find that the key space can be enlarged by the regulating parameters in fractional-order chaotic systems, which enables the fractional-order chaotic system to be more suitable for the use of the encryption and control processing. Therefore, synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems has gained increasing interests in recent decades ^{[21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]}. It is noticed that most synchronization methods mentioned in ^{[4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]} work for integer-order chaotic systems. Here, we shall extend to cascade synchronization for integer-order chaotic systems to a kind of general form, namely function cascade synchronization (FCS), which means that one chaotic system may be synchronized with another by sending a signal from one to the other wherein a scaling function is involved. The FCS is effective both for the fractional order and integer order chaotic systems. It constitutes a general method, which can be considered as a continuation and extension of earlier works of ^[13,16,19]. The nice feature of our method is that we introduce a scaling function for achieving synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems, which can be chosen as a constant, trigonometric function, power function, logarithmic and exponential function, hyperbolic function and even combinations of them. Hence, our method is more general than some existing methods, such as the complete synchronization approach and anti-phase synchronization approach et al.

To sum up, in this paper, we would like to use the FCS approach proposed to study the synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems. We begin our theoretical work with the Caputo fractional derivative. Then, we give the FCS of the fractional-order chaotic systems in theory. Subsequently, we take the fractional-order unified chaotic system as a concrete example to test the effectiveness of our method. Finally, we make a short conclusion.

2. The method of FCS for fractional-order chaotic systems

As for the fractional derivative, there exists a lot of mathematical definitions ^[32,33]. Here, we shall only adopt the Caputo fractional calculus, which allows the traditional initial and boundary condition assumptions. The Caputo fractional calculus is described by

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q f(t)}{dt^q} = \frac{1}{{\Gamma}(q-n)}\int^t_0 \frac{f^{(n)}(\xi)}{(t-\xi)^{q-n+1}}d\xi, \quad\quad n-1 \lt q \lt n . \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

Here, we give the function cascade synchronization method to fractional-order chaotic systems. Take a fractional-order dynamical system:

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q x}{d t^q} = f(x) = L x+N( x) \end{eqnarray}$

(2.2)

as a drive system. In the above $x = (x_1, x_2, x_3)^T$ is the state vector, $f: R^3 \rightarrow R^3$ is a continuous function, $L x$ and $N(x)$ represent the linear and nonlinear part of $f(x)$ , respectively.

Firstly, on copying any two equations of $(2.2)$ , such as the first two, one will obtain a sub-response system:

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q y}{d t^q} = L_1 y+N_1(y, x_3)+\tilde{U} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

with $y = (X_1, Z)^T$ . In the above, $x_3$ is a signal provided by (2.2), while $\tilde{U} = (u_1, u_2)^T$ is a controller to be devised.

For the purpose of realizing the synchronization, we now define the error vector function via

$\begin{eqnarray} \tilde{e} = y-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

where $\tilde{e} = (e_1, e_2)^T$ , $\tilde{x} = (x_1, x_2)^T$ and $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x}) = {\rm diag}({Q}_1(x_1), {Q}_2(x_2))$ .

Definition 1. For the drive system (2.2) and response system (2.3), one can say that the synchronization is achieved with a scaling function matrix $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})$ if there exists a suitable controller $\tilde{U}$ such that

$\begin{eqnarray} \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||\tilde{e}||} = \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||y-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}||} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.5)

Remark 1. We would like to point out that one can have various different choices on the scaling function $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})$ , such as constant, power function, trigonometric function, hyperbola function, logarithmic and exponential function, as well as limited quantities of combinations and composite of the above functions. Particularly, when $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x}) = I$ and $-I$ ( $I$ being a unit matrix), the problem is reducible to the complete synchronization and anti-phase synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems, respectively. When $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x}) = \alpha I$ , it becomes to the project synchronization. And when $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})$ = ${\rm diag}(\alpha_1, \alpha_2)$ , it turns to the modified projective synchronization. Hence, our method is more general than the existing methods in ^[4,13].

It is noticed from (2.5) that the system (2.3) will synchronize with (2.2) if and only if the error dynamical system (2.5) is stable at zero. For this purpose, an appropriate controller $\tilde{U}$ such that (2.5) is asymptotical convergent to zero is designed, which is described in the following theorem.

Theorem 1. For a scaling function matrix $\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})$ , the FCS will happen between (2.2) and (2.3) if the conditions:

(i) the controller $\tilde{U}$ is devised by

$\begin{eqnarray} \tilde{U} = \tilde{K}\tilde{e}-N_1(y, x_3)+\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})N_1(\tilde{x})+\tilde{P}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

(ii) the matrix $\tilde{K}$ is a $2\times 2$ matrix such that

$\begin{eqnarray} L_1+\tilde{K} = -\tilde{C}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.7)

are satisfied simultaneously. In the above, $\tilde{P}(\tilde{x}) = {\rm {diag}}(\dot{Q}_1(x_1)\frac{ d^q x_1}{d t^q}, \dot{Q}_2(x_2)\frac{ d^q x_2}{d t^q})$ , $\tilde{K}$ is a $2\times 2$ function matrix to be designed. While $\tilde{C} = (\tilde{C}_{ij})$ is a $2\times 2$ function matrix wherein

$\begin{eqnarray} \tilde{C}_{ii} \gt 0 \quad \quad{\rm and} \quad \quad \tilde{C}_{ij} = -\tilde{C}_{ji}, \quad i\neq j. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.8)

Remark 2. It needs to point out that the construction of the suitable controller $\tilde{U}$ plays an important role in realizing the synchronization between (2.2) and (2.3). Theorem 2 provides an effective way to design the controller. It is seen from the theorem that the controller $\tilde{U}$ is closely related to the matrix $\tilde{C}$ . Once the condition $(2.8$ ) is satisfied, one will has many choices on the controller $\tilde{U}$ .

Remark 3. Based on the fact that the fractional orders themselves are varying parameters and can be applied as secret keys when the synchronization algorithm is adopted in secure communications, it is believed that our method will be more suitable for some engineering applications, such as chaos-based encryption and secure communication.

Proof: Let's turn back to the error function given in (2.4). Differentiating this equation with respect to $t$ and on use of the first two equations of (2.2) and (2.3), one will obtain the following dynamical system

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q \tilde{e}}{d t^q}& = &\frac{d^q y}{d t^q}-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})\frac{d^q x}{d t^q}-\tilde{P}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}\\ & = &L_1 y+N_1(y, x_3)+\tilde{U}-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})[L_1 \tilde{x}+N_1(\tilde{x})]-\tilde{P}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}\\ & = &L_1\tilde{e}+N_1(y, x_3)-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})N_1(\tilde{x})-\tilde{P}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}+\tilde{K}\tilde{e}-N_1(y, x_3)+\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})N_1(\tilde{x})+\tilde{P}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}\\ & = &(L_1+\tilde{K})\tilde{e}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.9)

Assuming that $\lambda$ is an arbitrary eigenvalue of matrix $L_1+\tilde{K}$ and its eigenvector is recorded as $\eta$ , i.e.

$\begin{eqnarray} ( L_1+\tilde{K} )\eta = \lambda \eta, \quad \eta\neq 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.10)

On multiplying (2.10) by $\eta^{\mathbf {H}}$ on the left, we obtain that

$\begin{eqnarray} \eta^{\mathbf {H}}( L_1+\tilde{K} )\eta = \lambda \eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta \end{eqnarray}$

(2.11)

where ${\mathbf {H}}$ denotes conjugate transpose. Since $\bar{\lambda}$ is also an eigenvalue of $L_1+\tilde{K}$ , we have that

$\begin{eqnarray} \eta^{\mathbf {H}}( L_1+\tilde{K} )^{\mathbf {H}} = \bar{\lambda} \eta^{\mathbf {H}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.12)

On multiplying (2.12) by $\eta$ on the right, we derive that

$\begin{eqnarray} \eta^{\mathbf {H}}( L_1+\tilde{K} )^{\mathbf {H}}\eta = \bar{\lambda} \eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta \end{eqnarray}$

(2.13)

From (2.11) and (2.13), one can easily get that

$\begin{eqnarray} \lambda+\bar{\lambda}& = &\eta^{\mathbf {H}}[( L_1+\tilde{K} )^{\mathbf {H}}+( L_1+\tilde{K} )]\eta/\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta\\[0.06in] & = &-\eta^{\mathbf {H}}(\tilde{C}+\tilde{C}^{\mathbf {H}})\eta/\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta\\[0.06in] & = &-\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\Lambda\eta/\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta \end{eqnarray}$

(2.14)

with $\Lambda = \tilde{C}+\tilde{C}^{\mathbf {H}}$ . Since $\tilde{C}$ satisfy the condition (2.8), one can know that $\Lambda$ denotes a real positive diagonal matrix. Thus we have $\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\Lambda\eta > 0$ . Accordingly, we can get

$\begin{eqnarray} \lambda+\bar{\lambda} = 2\mathbf {Re}(\lambda) = -\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\Lambda\eta/\eta^{\mathbf {H}}\eta \lt 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.15)

which shows

$\begin{eqnarray} |\mathbf{arg}\lambda| \gt \frac{\pi}{2} \gt \frac{q\pi}{2}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.16)

According to the stability theorem in Ref. ^[34], the error dynamical system (2.9) is asymptotically stable, i.e.

$\begin{eqnarray} \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||\tilde{e}||} = \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||y-\tilde{Q}(\tilde{x})\tilde{x}||} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.17)

which implies that synchronization can be achieved between (2.2) and (2.3). The proof is completed.

Next, on copying the last two equations of (2.2), one will get another sub-response system:

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q z}{d t^q} = L_2 z+N_2(z, X_1)+\bar{U} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.18)

where $X_1$ is a synchronized variable in (2.3), $z = (X_2, X_3)^T$ and $\bar{U} = (u_3, u_4)^T$ is the controller being designed.

Here, we make analysis analogous to the above. Now we define the error $\bar{e}$ via

$\begin{eqnarray} \tilde{e} = z-\bar{Q}(\bar{x})\bar{x} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.19)

where $\bar{e} = (e_3, e_4)^T$ , $\bar{x} = (x_2, x_3)^T$ and $\bar{Q}(\bar{x}) = {\rm diag}({Q}_3(x_2), {Q}_4(x_3))$ . If devising the the controller $\bar{U}$ as

$\begin{eqnarray} \bar{U} = \bar{K}\bar{e}-N_2(z, X_1)+\bar{Q}(\bar{x})N_2(\bar{x})+\bar{P}(\bar{x})\bar{x} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.20)

and $L_2+\bar{K}$ satisfying

$\begin{eqnarray} L_2+\bar{K} = -\bar{C} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.21)

where $\bar{P}(\bar{x}) = {\rm {diag}}(\dot{Q}_3(x_2)\frac{ d^q x_2}{d t^q}, \dot{Q}_4(x_3)\frac{ d^q x_3}{d t^q})$ , $\bar{C} = (\bar{C}_{ij})$ denotes a $2\times 2$ function matrix satisfying

$\begin{eqnarray} \bar{C}_{ii} \gt 0 \quad \quad{\rm and} \quad \quad \bar{C}_{ij} = -\bar{C}_{ji}, \quad i\neq j, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.22)

then the error dynamical system (2.19) satisfies

$\begin{eqnarray} \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||\bar{e}||} = \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||z-\bar{Q}(\bar{x})\bar{x}||} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.23)

Therefore, one achieve the synchronization between the system (2.2) and (2.18). Accordingly, from (2.5) and (2.23), one can obtain that

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||X_1-Q_1(x_1)x_1||} = 0, \\[0.08in] \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||X_2-Q_3(x_2)x_2||} = 0, \\[0.08in] \lim\limits_{t \to \infty }{||X_3-Q_4(x_3)x_3||} = 0. \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.24)

which indicates the FCS is achieved for the fractional order chaotic systems.

3. Applications of FCS method to fractional-order unified chaotic system

In the sequel, we shall extend the applications of FCS approach to the fractional-order unified chaotic system to test the effectiveness.

The fractional-order unified chaotic system is described by:

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{d^{q} x_{1}}{d t^q} = (25a+10)(x_2-x_1), \\[0.1in] \\ \frac{d^q x_{2}}{d t^q} = (28-35a)x_1-x_1x_3+(29a-1)x_2, \\[0.1in] \\ \frac{d^q x_{3}}{d t^q } = x_1x_2-\frac{a+8}{3}x_3, \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

where $x_i, (i = 1, 2, 3)$ are the state parameters and $a\in[0, 1]$ is the control parameter. It is know that when $0\leq a < 0.8$ , the system (3.1) corresponds to the fractional-order Lorenz system ^[35]; when $a = 0.8$ , it is the Lü system ^[36]; while when $0.8 < a < 1$ , it turns to the Chen system ^[37].

According to the FCS method in section 2, we take (3.1) as the drive system. On copying the first two equation, we get a sub-response system of (3.1):

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{d^q X_{1}}{d t^q} = (25a+10)(Z-X_1)+u_1, \\[0.12in] \\ \frac{d^q Z}{d t^q} = (28-35a)X_1-Z x_3+(29a-1)Z+u_2, \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

where $\tilde{U} = (u_1, u_2)^T$ is a controller to be determined. In the following, we need to devise the desired controller $\tilde{U}$ such that (3.1) can be synchronized with (3.2). For this purpose, we set the error function $\tilde{e} = (e_1, e_2)$ via :

$\begin{eqnarray} \tilde{e} = (e_1, e_2) = (X_1-x_1(x_1^2+\alpha_1), Z-x_2\tanh{x_2}). \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

On devising the controller $\tilde{U}$ as (2.6), one can get that the error dynamical system is

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q \tilde{e}}{d t^q} = (L_1+\tilde{K})\tilde{e}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} & L_1 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} -10-25a & -10-25a\\ 28-35a & 29a-1 \\ \end{array} \right), \end{split} \quad\quad\quad \begin{split} & N_1(y, x_3) = \left( \begin{array}{c} 0 \\ -X_1x_3 \\ \end{array} \right){.} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.5)

If choosing, for example, the matrix $\tilde{K}$ as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} & \tilde{K} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} -\lambda_1+25a+10 & x_1+x_1x_2-25a\\ -x_1-x_1x_2+35a-38 & -\lambda_2-29a+1 \\ \end{array} \right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

where $\lambda_1 > 0$ and $\lambda_2 > 0$ , then one can obtain that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} & \tilde{C} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} -\lambda_1 & x_1+x_1x_2+10\\ -x_1-x_1x_2-10 & -\lambda_2 \\ \end{array} \right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.7)

Therefore the dynamical system (3.4) becomes

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q \tilde{e}}{d t^q} = \begin{split} &\left( \begin{array}{cc} -\lambda_1 & x_1+x_1x_2\\ -x_1-x_1x_2 & -\lambda_2 \\ \end{array} \right)\tilde{e}. \end{split} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.8)

According to Theorem 2, the synchronization is realized in the system (3.1) and (3.2).

Subsequently, on copying the last two equations of (3.1), we get another sub-response system:

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\partial^q X_{2}}{\partial t^q} = (28-35a)X_1-X_1 X_3+(29a-1)X_2+u_3, \\[0.15in] \\ \frac{\partial^q X_{3}}{\partial t^q} = X_1X_2-\frac{a+8}{3}X_3+u_4, \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

where $\bar{U} = ({u_3, \ u_4})^T$ is the controller needed. When choosing the error function $\bar{e} = (e_3, e_4)$ as:

$\begin{eqnarray} \bar{e} = (e_3, e_4) = (X_2-\alpha_2 x_2, X_3-x_3(\alpha_3+e^{-x_3})), \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

and the controller $\bar{U}$ as (2.20), where

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} & L_2 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 29a-1 & 0\\ 0 & -\frac{a+8}{3} \\ \end{array} \right), \end{split} \quad\quad\quad \begin{split} & N_2(z, X_1) = \left( \begin{array}{c} -X_1X_3 \\ X_1X_2 \\ \end{array} \right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.11)

and the matrix $\bar{K}$ is chosen by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} & \bar{K} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} -\lambda_3-29a+1 & 1+x_2x_3+e^{-x_3}\\ -1-x_2x_3-e^{-x_3} & -\lambda_4-\frac{a+8}{3} \\ \end{array} \right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.12)

where $\lambda_3 > 0$ and $\lambda_4 > 0$ . Calculations show that the error dynamical system (2.19) becomes

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{d^q \bar{e}}{d t^q} = \begin{split} &\left( \begin{array}{cc} -\lambda_3 & 1+x_2x_3+e^{-x_3}\\ -1-x_2x_3-e^{-x_3} & -\lambda_4 \\ \end{array} \right)\bar{e}. \end{split} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.13)

which, according to the stability theorem, indicates that $\bar{e}$ will approach to zero with time evolutions. Therefore, the FCS is realized for the fractional-order unified chaotic system.

In the above, we have revealed that the FCS is achieved for the fractional-order unified chaotic system in theory. In the sequel, we shall show that the FCS is also effective in the numerical algorithm.

For illustration, we set the fractional order $q = 0.98$ and the parameters $\lambda_i (i = 1, \cdots, 4)$ as $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3, \lambda_4) = (2, 3, 0.5, 0.3)$ . It is noticed that when the value of $a\in[0, 1]$ is given, the system (3.1) will be reduced to a concrete system. For example, when $a = 0.2$ , it corresponds to the fractional-order Lorenz system. The chaotic attractors are depicted in Figure 1. Time responses of states variables and synchronization errors of the Lorenz system are showed in and , respectively. When $a = 0.8$ , it is the fractional-order Lü system. The chaotic attractors, time responses of state variables and synchronization errors are exhibited in –, respectively. When $a = 0.95$ , it turns to the fractional-order Chen system. Numerical simulation results are depicted in Figures 7–9. From the chaotic attractors pictures marked by Figures 1, 4 and 5, one can easily see that the trajectories of the response system (colored red) display certain consistency to that of the drive system (colored black) because of the special scaling functions chosen. Meanwhile, one can also see the synchronization is realized from Figures 3, 6 and 9. Therefore, we conclude that the FCS is a very effective algorithm for achieving the synchronization of the fractional-order unified chaotic system.

Figure 1. FCS of the fractional-order Lorenz system. Here we choose

$(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3) = (0.2, 2, -1.5)$ , initial values

$(x_1, x_2, x_3) = (-1, -0.5, -0.2)$ and

$(X_1, X_2, X_3) = (0.2, 0.3, 0.1)$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. Time responses of state variables

$x_i$ and

$X_i (i = 1, 2, 3)$ for the fractional-order Lorenz system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. Synchronization errors of the Lorenz system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. FCS of the fractional-order Lü system with

$a = 0.8$ . Here we choose

$(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3) = (-0.5, 2.5)$ , initial values

$(x_1, x_2, x_3) = (0.5, -0.5, 0.2)$ and

$(X_1, X_2, X_3) = (0.15, -0.1, -0.1)$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. Time responses of state variables

$x_i$ and

$X_i (i = 1, 2, 3)$ for the Lü system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 6. Synchronization errors of the Lü system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 7. FCS of the fractional-order Chen system with

$a = 0.95$ . Here we choose

$(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3) = (0.5, 1.5, 3)$ , initial values

$(x_1, x_2, x_3) = (1.5, 0.02, -0.01)$ and

$(X_1, X_2, X_3) = (-2, 0.01, -0.05)$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 8. Time evolutions of state variables

$x_i$ and

$X_i$

$(i = 1, 2, 3)$ for the Chen system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 9. Synchronization errors of the Chen system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

4. Conclusions

Chaos synchronization, because of the potential applications in telecommunications, control theory, secure communication et al, has attracted great attentions from various research fields. In the present work, via the stability theorem, we successfully extend the cascade synchronization of integer-order chaotic systems to a kind of general function cascade synchronization algorithm for fractional-order chaotic systems. Meanwhile, we apply the method to the fractional-order unified chaotic system for an illustrative test. Corresponding numerical simulations fully reveal that our method is not only accuracy, but also effective.

It is worthy of pointing out that the scaling function introduced makes the method more general than the complete synchronization, anti-phase synchronization, modified projective synchronization et al. Therefore, in this sense, our method is applicable and representative. However, the present work just study the fractional-order chaotic system without time-delay. It is known that in many cases the time delay is inevitably in the real engineering applications. Lag synchronization seems to be more practical and reasonable. Hence, it will be of importance and interest to study whether the FCS method can be used to realize the synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems with time-delay. We shall considered it in our future work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the referees for their kind comments and valuable suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No.11775116 and No.11301269.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interests.

References

[1]	N. Laskin, Fractional quantum mechanics and Lèvy path integrals, Phys. Lett. A, 268 (2000), 298-304. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00201-2
[2]	N. Laskin, Fractional Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E, 66 (2002), 056108.
[3]	T. Boulenger, D. Himmelsbach, E. Lenzmann, Blowup for fractional NLS, J. Funct. Anal., 271 (2016), 2569-2603. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2016.08.011
[4]	B. Wang, Y. Wang, Fractional white noise functional soliton solutions of a wick-type stochastic fractional NLSE, Appl. Math. Lett., 110 (2020), 106583.
[5]	G. Wu, C. Dai, Nonautonomous soliton solutions of variable-coefficient fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 106 (2020), 106365.
[6]	C. Dai, J. Zhang, Controlling effect of vector and scalar crossed double-Ma breathers in a partially nonlocal nonlinear medium with a linear potential, Nonlinear Dyn., 100 (2020), 1621-1628. doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05603-9
[7]	L. Yu, G. Wu, Y. Wang, et al. Traveling wave solutions constructed by Mittag-Leffler function of a (2 + 1)-dimensional space-time fractional NLS equation, Results Phys., 17 (2020), 103156.
[8]	Y. Cho, H. Hajaiej, G. Hwang, et al. On the Cauchy problem of fractional Schrödinger equations with Hartree type nonlimearity, Funkcial. Ekvac., 56 (2013), 193-224. doi: 10.1619/fesi.56.193
[9]	Y. Cho, H. Hajaiej, G. Hwang, et al. On the orbital stability of fractional Schrödinger equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 13 (2013), 1267-1282.
[10]	Y. Cho, G. Hwang, S. Kwon, et al. Profile decompositions and Blow-up phenomena of mass critical fractional Schrödinger equations, Nonlinear Anal., 86 (2013), 12-29. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2013.03.002
[11]	Y. Cho, G. Hwang, S. Kwon, et al. On finite time blow-up for the mass-critical Hartree equations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 145 (2015), 467-479. doi: 10.1017/S030821051300142X
[12]	Y. Cho, G. Hwang, S. Kwon, et al. Well-posedness and ill-posedness for the cubic fractional Schrödinger equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 35 (2015), 2863-2880. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2863
[13]	V. D. Dinh, Well-posedness of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger and wave equations in Sobolev spaces, Int. J. Appl. Math., 31 (2018), 483-525.
[14]	V. D. Dinh, A study on blowup solutions to the focusing L²-supercritical nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), 071506.
[15]	V. D. Dinh, B. Feng, On fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with combined power-type nonlinearities, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 39 (2019), 4565-4612. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019188
[16]	B. Feng, On the blow-up solutions for the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with combined power-type nonlinearities, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 17 (2018), 1785-1804. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018085
[17]	B. Feng, J. Ren, Q. Wang, Existence and instability of normalized standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger equations in the L²-supercritical case, J. Math. Phys., 61 (2020), 071511.
[18]	S. Zhu, Existence of stable standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger equations with combined nonlinearities, J. Evol. Equations, 17 (2017), 1003-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00028-016-0363-1
[19]	B. Feng, H. Zhang, Stability of standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger-Choquard equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 75 (2018), 2499-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.12.025
[20]	B. Feng, H. Zhang, Stability of standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger-Hartree equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 460 (2018), 352-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.11.060
[21]	Q. Guo, S. Zhu, Sharp threshold of blow-up and scattering for the fractional Hartree equation, J. Differ. Equations, 264 (2018), 2802-2832. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.11.001
[22]	Y. Hong, Y. Sire, On fractional Schrödinger equations in Sobolev spaces, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 14 (2015), 2265-2282. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2265
[23]	J. Zhang, S. Zhu, Stability of standing waves for the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 29 (2017), 1017-1030. doi: 10.1007/s10884-015-9477-3
[24]	S. Zhu, On the blow-up solutions for the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 1506-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.04.007
[25]	B. Feng, R. Chen, J. Ren, Existence of stable standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger equations with combined power-type and Choquard-type nonlinearities, J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), 051512.
[26]	T. Saanouni, Remarks on damped fractional Schrödinger equation with pure power nonlinearity, J. Math. Phys., 56 (2015), 061502.
[27]	T. Saanouni, Remarks on the inhomogeneous fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 57 (2016), 081503.
[28]	T. Saanouni, Strong instability of standing waves for the fractional Choquard equation, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), 081509.
[29]	B. Feng, R. Chen, J. Liu, Blow-up criteria and instability of normalized standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger-Choquard equation, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 10 (2021), 311-330.
[30]	I. V. Barashenkov, N. V. Alexeeva, E. V. Zemlianaya, Two and three dimensional oscillons in nonlinear Faradey resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 (2002), 104101.
[31]	T. S. Gill, Optical guiding of laser beam in nonuniform plasma, Pramana, 55 (2000), 835-842. doi: 10.1007/s12043-000-0051-z
[32]	C. S. Liu, V. K. Tripathi, Laser guiding in an axially nonuniform plasma channel, Phys. Plasmas, 1 (1994), 3100-3103. doi: 10.1063/1.870501
[33]	F. Genoud, C.A. Stuart, Schrödinger equations with a spatially decaying nonlinearity: Existence and stability of standing waves, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 21 (2008), 137-286. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.137
[34]	T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 10 (2003).
[35]	F. Genoud, Bifurcation and stability of travelling waves in self-focusing planar waveguides, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 10 (2010), 357-400.
[36]	L. G. Farah, Global well-posedness and blow-up on the energy space for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Evol. Equations, 16 (2016), 193-208.37. L. G. Farah, C. M. Guzman, Scattering for the radial focusing INLS equation in higher dimensions, doi: 10.1007/s00028-015-0298-y
[37]	2017. preprint arXiv:1703.10 988.
[38]	L. G. Farah, C. M. Guzman, et al. Scattering for the radial 3D cubic focusing inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Differ. Equations, 262 (2017), 4175-4231. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.01.013
[39]	V. D. Dinh, Blowup of H¹ solutions for a class of the focusing inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinear Anal., 174 (2018), 169-188. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2018.04.024
[40]	T. Cazenave, P. L. Lions, Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Commun. Math. Phys., 85 (1982), 549-561. doi: 10.1007/BF01403504
[41]	A. Bensouilah, V. D. Dinh, S. H. Zhu, On stability and instability of standing waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with an inverse-square potential, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), 101505.
[42]	B. Feng, R. Chen, Q. Wang, Instability of standing waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson equation in the L²-critical case, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 32 (2020), 1357-1370. doi: 10.1007/s10884-019-09779-6
[43]	B. Feng, J. Liu, H. Niu, et al. Strong instability of standing waves for a fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the mixed dispersions, Nonlinear Anal., 196 (2020), 111791.
[44]	C. Peng, D. Zhao, Global existence and blowup on the energy space for the inhomogeneous fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B, 24 (2019), 3335-3356. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018323
[45]	B. Feng, On the blow-up solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with combined powertype nonlinearities, J. Evol. Equations, 18 (2018), 203-220. doi: 10.1007/s00028-017-0397-z

This article has been cited by:

1.	Shengliang Zhang, A meshless multi-symplectic local radial basis function collocation scheme for the “good” Boussinesq equation, 2022, 431, 00963003, 127297, 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127297
2.	Minghung Lin, Yiyou Hou, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik, The global attractive sets and synchronization of a fractional-order complex dynamical system, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 3523, 10.3934/math.2023179
3.	Yanyun Xie, Wenliang Cai, Jing Wang, Jesus M. Munoz-Pacheco, Stability and Synchronization of a Fractional‐Order Unified System with Complex Variables, 2024, 2024, 1026-0226, 10.1155/2024/2728661
4.	Shaohui Yan, Hanbing Zhang, Defeng Jiang, Jiawei Jiang, Yu Cui, Yuyan Zhang, Finite-time synchronization of fractional-order chaotic system based on hidden attractors, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 105226, 10.1088/1402-4896/acf308
5.	Haifeng Huang, Investigation of a high-performance control algorithm for a unified chaotic system synchronization control based on parameter adaptive method, 2024, 18724981, 1, 10.3233/IDT-240178

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.1

Metrics

Article views(3908) PDF downloads(263) Cited by(2)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

AIMS Mathematics

On stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrodinger equation

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The method of FCS for fractional-order chaotic systems

3. Applications of FCS method to fractional-order unified chaotic system

4. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

On stability and instability of standing waves for the inhomogeneous fractional Schrodinger equation

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The method of FCS for fractional-order chaotic systems

3. Applications of FCS method to fractional-order unified chaotic system

4. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog