Conventional pneumatic tires face persistent challenges, including susceptibility to punctures, pressure loss, and significant environmental waste from end-of-life disposal. These limitations necessitate the development of next-generation tire technologies. This study presents the design and comprehensive analysis of a novel modular airless tire (MAT) as a sustainable, maintenance-free alternative. The MAT architecture features radially distributed, independently replaceable composite leaf springs and tread segments, a design intended to maximize service life and minimize waste. A comparative performance evaluation was conducted using finite element analysis (FEA) to assess two advanced composite materials, namely carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP). The analysis simulated static loading conditions based on a real-world vehicle platform to evaluate key performance metrics, including total deformation, equivalent von-Mises stress, and composite-specific failure criteria. Results indicate that CFRP exhibits vastly superior stiffness and strength, with 52% lower deformation and 31% higher stress resistance compared to GFRP under identical loads. The findings highlight MAT’s potential to surpass pneumatic tires in durability and sustainability. Specifically, the CFRP variant is identified as the optimal material for high-performance applications, paving the way for a revolutionary, cost-efficient, and environmentally responsible tire design that addresses the core deficiencies of current technologies.
Citation: Sivarao Subramonian, Kumaran Kadirgama, Zuhair Khalim, Shukor Salleh, Umesh Vates, Satish Pujari, Sara Lee Kit Yee, Devarajan Ramasamy, Anuar Kassim. Design and finite element analysis of a composite modular airless tyre[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(6): 1246-1264. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025058
Conventional pneumatic tires face persistent challenges, including susceptibility to punctures, pressure loss, and significant environmental waste from end-of-life disposal. These limitations necessitate the development of next-generation tire technologies. This study presents the design and comprehensive analysis of a novel modular airless tire (MAT) as a sustainable, maintenance-free alternative. The MAT architecture features radially distributed, independently replaceable composite leaf springs and tread segments, a design intended to maximize service life and minimize waste. A comparative performance evaluation was conducted using finite element analysis (FEA) to assess two advanced composite materials, namely carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP). The analysis simulated static loading conditions based on a real-world vehicle platform to evaluate key performance metrics, including total deformation, equivalent von-Mises stress, and composite-specific failure criteria. Results indicate that CFRP exhibits vastly superior stiffness and strength, with 52% lower deformation and 31% higher stress resistance compared to GFRP under identical loads. The findings highlight MAT’s potential to surpass pneumatic tires in durability and sustainability. Specifically, the CFRP variant is identified as the optimal material for high-performance applications, paving the way for a revolutionary, cost-efficient, and environmentally responsible tire design that addresses the core deficiencies of current technologies.
| [1] | Ikeda Y, Kato A, Kohjiya S, et al. (2018) Pneumatic tire technology, In: Ikeda Y, Kato A, Kohjiya S, Rubber Science—A Modern Approach, Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2938-7_5 |
| [2] | Dhore ML, Patthe A, Pawar K, et al. (2024) Advancing automotive safety: Integrated tyre pressure monitoring and puncture detection system for proactive tyre health management. 2024 4th Asian Conference on Innovation in Technology (ASIANCON), Pimari Chinchwad, India 62057: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASIANCON62057.2024.10837891 |
| [3] |
Valentini F, Pegoretti A (2022) End-of-life options of tyres: A review. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 5: 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.08.006
|
| [4] |
Du X, Zhao Y, Wang Q, et al. (2019) Grounding characteristics of a non-pneumatic mechanical elastic tire in a rolling state with a camber angle. Stroj Vestn-J Mech Eng 65: 287–296. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5845 doi: 10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5845
|
| [5] |
Wijaya R, Adinegoro F, Mahardika M, et al. (2023) Investigating the effects of load and deceleration on non-pneumatic tire deformation and stress during braking. Glob J Res Eng 29: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJREGVOL23IS2PG13 doi: 10.34257/GJREGVOL23IS2PG13
|
| [6] |
Sardinha M, Fátima Vaz M, Ramos TRP, et al. (2023) Design, properties, and applications of non-pneumatic tires: A review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L 237: 2277–2297. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231177302 doi: 10.1177/14644207231177302
|
| [7] |
Deng Y, Liu T, Wang Z, et al. (2024) Numerical study of steady-state dynamic characteristic of non-pneumatic tire with local structural damage. Eur J Mech A-Solids 105: 105428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105428 doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105428
|
| [8] |
Liu T, Deng Y, Lu K, et al. (2024) Mechanical properties analysis of non-pneumatic tire with gradient honeycomb structure. Eng Sci Technol Int J 49: 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101871 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101871
|
| [9] |
Deng Y, Wang Z, Shen H, et al. (2023) A comprehensive review on non-pneumatic tyre research. Mater Des 225: 111742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111742 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111742
|
| [10] |
Pelc J (2002) Static three-dimensional modelling of pneumatic tyres using the technique of element overlaying. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D 216: 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070260340808 doi: 10.1243/09544070260340808
|
| [11] |
Shuai Z, Gao S, Yu Y, et al. (2024) Characteristic study and design factor analysis of a novel non-pneumatic tyre with V-shaped spokes. Mater Des 238: 112681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112681 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112681
|
| [12] |
Guo S, Zhao Y, Lin F, et al. (2025) Steady-state rolling resistance prediction model of non-pneumatic tyres considering tread temperature: theory and experiment. Veh Syst Dyn 63: 876–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2024.2362382 doi: 10.1080/00423114.2024.2362382
|
| [13] |
Liu S, Liu W, Zhou S, et al. (2023) Steady-state temperature field and rolling resistance characteristics of low-speed and low-load capacity non-pneumatic tires. Lubricants 11: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11090402 doi: 10.3390/lubricants11090402
|
| [14] |
Zhu X, Pang Y, Yang J, et al. (2022) Numerical analysis of hydroplaning behaviour by using a tire–water-film–runway model. Int J Pavement Eng 23: 784–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1774587 doi: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1774587
|
| [15] |
Cattani P, Cattani L, Magrini A (2023) Tyre–road heat transfer coefficient equation proposal. Appl Sci 13: 11996. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111996 doi: 10.3390/app132111996
|
| [16] |
He H, Liu J, Zhang Y, et al. (2022) Heat build-up and rolling resistance analysis of a solid tire: Experimental observation and numerical simulation with thermo-mechanical coupling method. Polymers 14: 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112210 doi: 10.3390/polym14112210
|
| [17] |
Wyatt O, Chatzistergos P, Chockalingam N, et al. (2024) A flexible-spoke non-pneumatic tyre for manual wheelchairs. Sci Rep 14: 29032. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79689-1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79689-1
|
| [18] |
Zheng Z, Dorugade D, Rakheja S, et al. (2024) Multi-axis and cornering stiffness properties of non-pneumatic wheels with symmetric helical honeycomb spokes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D 238: 3007–3025. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070231182769 doi: 10.1177/09544070231182769
|
| [19] | Fazelpour M, Summers JD (2014) Evolution of meso-structures for non-pneumatic tire development: A case study. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2B: 40th Design Automation Conference, Buffalo, New York, USA, August 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34184 |
| [20] |
Wang J, Zeng H, Gao Q, et al. (2024) Fatigue life prediction and structural optimization design of the bionic petal non-pneumatic tire with spokes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D 238: 4569–4580. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070231197585 doi: 10.1177/09544070231197585
|
| [21] |
Fu H, Wang Y, Chen K, et al. (2024) A fatigue life prediction model of flexible spoke non-pneumatic tires. Eng Fract Mech 295: 109795. https://doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109795 doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109795
|
| [22] |
Jo H, Lee C, Kim K, et al. (2013) Vibration characteristics of non-pneumatic tire with honeycomb spokes. Trans Korean Soc Automot Eng 21: 174–180. https://doi.org/10.7467/KSAE.2013.21.4.174 doi: 10.7467/KSAE.2013.21.4.174
|
| [23] |
Tanveer M, Zu JW (2012) Non-linear vibration of hyperelastic axisymmetric solids by a mixed p-type method. Int J Non-Linear Mech 47: 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.08.003
|
| [24] |
Wu X, Chen Q, Zhao B, et al. (2023) Safety assessment of aircraft panel under the impact load by tire fragment based on thermal–mechanical effect. J Mater Eng Perform 32: 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07180-x doi: 10.1007/s11665-022-07180-x
|
| [25] |
Eck S, Prevedel P, Marsoner S, et al. (2014) Using finite element simulation to optimize the heat treatment of tire protection chains. J Mater Eng Perform 23: 1288–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-013-0854-y doi: 10.1007/s11665-013-0854-y
|
| [26] |
Liu X, Cai J, Zeng J, et al. (2021) Analysis of CFRP laminates properties under different layup structure using finite element analysis. Mater Res Proc 18: 249–254. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901311-30 doi: 10.21741/9781644901311-30
|
| [27] |
Mohd Sabee SSN, Yusof N, Rasid ZA, et al. (2021) Progressive failure analysis of laminated composite plates. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1051: 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012041 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012041
|
| [28] |
Li F, Hu X, Shahzad Q (2025) Anisotropic behavior in 3D printed concrete: Finite element simulation approach. J Mater Eng Perform 34: 8848–8859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10536-0 doi: 10.1007/s11665-024-10536-0
|
| [29] |
Soliman ESMM (2021) Evaluation of modal parameters and static characteristics for composite mono leaf spring. Noise Vib Worldwide 52: 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957456520964880 doi: 10.1177/0957456520964880
|
| [30] |
Wang L, Wang Z (2020) Failure analysis of the longitudinal composite leaf spring. J Fail Anal Preven 20: 1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00961-3 doi: 10.1007/s11668-020-00961-3
|
| [31] |
Bounjoum Y, Hamlaoui O, Hajji MK, et al. (2024) Exploring damage patterns in CFRP reinforcements: Insights from simulation and experimentation. Polymers 16: 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16142057 doi: 10.3390/polym16142057
|
| [32] |
Singh B, Mohanty A (2022) Influence of nanodiamonds on the mechanical properties of glass fiber-/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Eng Perform 31: 3847–3858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06469-7 doi: 10.1007/s11665-021-06469-7
|
| [33] |
Ascione F, Maselli G, Nesticò A (2024) Sustainable materials selection in industrial construction: A life-cycle based approach to compare the economic and structural performances of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) and steel. J Clean Prod 475: 143641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143641 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143641
|
| [34] |
Veerakumar VGS, Shanmugavel BP, Paskaramoorthy R, et al. (2021) The influence of graphene nanoplatelets on the tensile and impact behavior of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Mater Eng Perform 30: 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05335-2 doi: 10.1007/s11665-020-05335-2
|
| [35] | Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd Eds., Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498711067 |
| [36] |
Shokrieh MM, Rezaei D (2003) Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf spring. Compos Struct 60: 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00349-5 doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00349-5
|
| [37] | ANSYS Inc (2024) ANSYS composite preppost failure analysis user’s guide, release 2024R1. ANSYS Inc. Available from: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v241/en/acp_users_guide/acp_users_guide.html. |
matersci-12-06-058-Supplementary.pdf |
![]() |