Research article Special Issues

Rolling-horizon supply chain capacity planning for IC design house considering forecast evolution and capacity regret

  • Published: 22 September 2026
  • 90B06, 37M05, 90C15

  • Demand uncertainty and long capacity lead times make supply chain capacity planning particularly challenging for integrated circuit (IC) design houses that manage multi-stage and multi-site outsourcing networks. In this study, we developed a long-term rolling-horizon supply chain capacity planning (RHSCCP) framework to support production planning decisions under evolving demand forecasts. For the analysis, we used simulation-generated scenarios based on additive and multiplicative martingale models of forecast evolution (MMFE) processes, incorporating different demand scenarios, covariance levels, and capacity regret strategies. Four RHSCCP models were developed in this study: minimax regret (RHSCCP-MMR), upper bound and lower bound (RHSCCP-ULB), expected value (RHSCCP-EV), and stochastic programming (RHSCCP-SP). Their performance was evaluated in a rolling-horizon simulation environment using total cost, capacity utilization, and order fulfillment rate. The results showed distinct performance characteristics across the four strategies. RHSCCP-ULB adopted a more conservative capacity-planning policy, resulting in relatively high fulfillment rates but lower capacity utilization as demand variability increased. In contrast, RHSCCP-EV maintains relatively stable capacity utilization but shows lower fulfillment performance. RHSCCP-MMR and RHSCCP-SP provide a better balance between fulfillment and capacity utilization. Under additive MMFE, particularly at higher demand fluctuations, RHSCCP-MMR is the preferred strategy because of its stronger fulfillment performance and robustness to demand uncertainty. Under multiplicative MMFE, RHSCCP-SP is preferred because it achieves minimum total cost while maintaining relatively high fulfillment and capacity utilization rates.

    Citation: James C. Chen, Tzu-Li Chen, Yin-Yann Chen, Chen-Yu Wang, Dewanti Anggrahini. Rolling-horizon supply chain capacity planning for IC design house considering forecast evolution and capacity regret[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(10): 5308-5350. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026183

    Related Papers:

  • Demand uncertainty and long capacity lead times make supply chain capacity planning particularly challenging for integrated circuit (IC) design houses that manage multi-stage and multi-site outsourcing networks. In this study, we developed a long-term rolling-horizon supply chain capacity planning (RHSCCP) framework to support production planning decisions under evolving demand forecasts. For the analysis, we used simulation-generated scenarios based on additive and multiplicative martingale models of forecast evolution (MMFE) processes, incorporating different demand scenarios, covariance levels, and capacity regret strategies. Four RHSCCP models were developed in this study: minimax regret (RHSCCP-MMR), upper bound and lower bound (RHSCCP-ULB), expected value (RHSCCP-EV), and stochastic programming (RHSCCP-SP). Their performance was evaluated in a rolling-horizon simulation environment using total cost, capacity utilization, and order fulfillment rate. The results showed distinct performance characteristics across the four strategies. RHSCCP-ULB adopted a more conservative capacity-planning policy, resulting in relatively high fulfillment rates but lower capacity utilization as demand variability increased. In contrast, RHSCCP-EV maintains relatively stable capacity utilization but shows lower fulfillment performance. RHSCCP-MMR and RHSCCP-SP provide a better balance between fulfillment and capacity utilization. Under additive MMFE, particularly at higher demand fluctuations, RHSCCP-MMR is the preferred strategy because of its stronger fulfillment performance and robustness to demand uncertainty. Under multiplicative MMFE, RHSCCP-SP is preferred because it achieves minimum total cost while maintaining relatively high fulfillment and capacity utilization rates.



    加载中


    [1] A. Seitz, M. Grunow, R. Akkerman, Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 227 (2020), 107683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107683 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107683
    [2] Y. Boulaksil, Safety stock placement in supply chains with demand forecast updates, Oper. Res. Perspect., 3 (2016), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2016.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2016.07.001
    [3] S. C. Graves, H. C. Meal, S. Dasu, Y. Qui, Two-stage production planning in a dynamic environment, in Multi-Stage Production Planning and Inventory Control, S. Axsäter, C. Schneeweiss, E. Silver (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 266 (1986), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51693-1_2
    [4] D. C. Heath, P. L. Jackson, Modeling the evolution of demand forecasts with application to safety stock analysis in production/distribution systems, IIE Trans., 26 (1994), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179408966604 doi: 10.1080/07408179408966604
    [5] A. P. Rastogi, J. W. Fowler, W. M. Carlyle, O. M. Araz, A. Maltz, B. Buke, Supply network capacity planning for semiconductor manufacturing with uncertain demand and correlation in demand considerations, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 134 (2011), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2009.11.006 doi: 10.1016/J.IJPE.2009.11.006
    [6] C. Y. Lee, V. Charles, A robust capacity expansion integrating the perspectives of marginal productivity and capacity regret, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 296 (2022), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.003
    [7] J. M. Swaminathan, Tool capacity planning for semiconductor fabrication facilities under demand uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 120 (2000), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00389-0 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00389-0
    [8] J. M. Swaminathan, Tool procurement planning for wafer fabrication facilities: A scenario-based approach. IIE Trans., 34 (2002), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170208928857
    [9] S. Karabuk, S. D. Wu, Coordinating strategic capacity planning in the semiconductor industry. Oper. Res., 51 (2003), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.51.6.839.24917
    [10] N. Geng, Z. Jiang, Capacity planning for semiconductor wafer fabrication with uncertain demand and capacity, in IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Sci. Eng., 29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2007.4341669
    [11] J. T. Lin, T. L. Chen, H. C. Chu, A stochastic dynamic programming approach for multi-site capacity planning in TFT-LCD manufacturing under demand uncertainty, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 148 (2014), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.003
    [12] J. Weston, P. Escalona, A. Angulo, R. Stegmaier, Strategic capacity expansion of a multi-item process with technology mixture under demand uncertainty: An Aggregate Robust MILP Approach, in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Oper. Res. Enter. Sys. (ICORES 2017), SciTePress, (2017), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006202201810191
    [13] H. A. Kuo, C. F. Chien, Semiconductor capacity expansion based on forecast evolution and mini-max regret strategy for smart production under demand uncertainty, Comput. Ind. Eng., 177 (2023), 109077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109077 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109077
    [14] J. T. Lin, Y. Y. Chen, A multi-site supply network planning problem considering variable time buckets–A TFT-LCD industry case, The Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 33 (2007), 1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0537-z doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0537-z
    [15] J. Stray, J. W. Fowler, W. M. Carlyle, A. P. Rastogi, Enterprise-wide semiconductor manufacturing resource planning, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 19 (2006), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2006.873399 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2006.873399
    [16] B. T. Denton, J. Forrest, R. J. Milne, IBM solves a mixed-integer program to optimize its semiconductor supply chain, Interfaces, 36 (2006), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1060.0238 doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0238
    [17] T. Ponsignon, L. Mönch, Heuristic approaches for master planning in semiconductor manufacturing, Comput. Oper. Res., 39 (2012), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.009
    [18] T. Ponsignon, L. Mönch, Simulation-based performance assessment of master planning approaches in semiconductor manufacturing, Omega, 46 (2014), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.005
    [19] J. J. Lowe, S. J. Mason, Integrated semiconductor supply chain production planning, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 29 (2016), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2016.2544202 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2016.2544202
    [20] D. Kim, Y. S. Park, H. W. Kim, K. S. Park, I. K. Moon, Inventory policy for postponement strategy in the semiconductor industry with a die bank, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 117 (2022), 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102498 doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102498
    [21] J. C. Chen, T. L. Chen, H. Y. Hu, P. Peng, T. Lin, Multiobjective order promising for outsourcing supply network of IC design houses, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 35 (2022), 680–697. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2022.3200128 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2022.3200128
    [22] J. C. Chen, T. L. Chen, W. C. Huang, P. Peng, T. Lin, Supply chain planning for IC design house back-end production network with turnkey service, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 36 (2023), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2023.3281485 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2023.3281485
    [23] A. Goli, Efficient optimization of robust project scheduling for industry 4.0: A hybrid approach based on machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 278 (2024), 109427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109427 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109427
    [24] A. Ala, A. Goli, Incorporating machine learning and optimization techniques for assigning patients to operating rooms by considering fairness policies, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 136 (2024), 108980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108980 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108980
    [25] A. Goli, Optimization of renewable energy project portfolio selection using hybrid AIS-AFS algorithm in an international case study, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 17388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68449-w doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68449-w
    [26] A. Hosseini, A. Goli, Energy-Aware Dual-Channel agricultural supply chain network design under uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng., 207 (2025), 111294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111294
    [27] S. Rahmani, A. Goli, Robust sustainable canola oil-based biodiesel supply chain network design under supply and demand uncertainty, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), 86268–86299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28044-4 doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28044-4
    [28] I. Shahsavani, A. Goli, A systematic literature review of circular supply chain network design: application of optimization models. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 27 (2025), 23483–23514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03362-2
    [29] A. Goli, E. B. Tirkolaee, A. M. Golmohammadi, Z. Atan, G. W. Weber, S. S. Ali, A robust optimization model to design an IoT-based sustainable supply chain network with flexibility, Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 33 (2025), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00870-4 doi: 10.1007/s10100-023-00870-4
    [30] A. Ghodratnama, R. Hassannia, A. Mirzazadeh, A fuzzy goal programming approach to solve a novel supply chain multi-objective mathematical model under uncertainty, Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model., 9 (2017), 280–314. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2017.091321 doi: 10.1504/IJBPSCM.2017.091321
    [31] A. Özmen, E. Kropat, G. W. Weber, Robust optimization in spline regression models for multi-model regulatory networks under polyhedral uncertainty, Optimization, 66 (2017), 2135–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2016.1209672 doi: 10.1080/02331934.2016.1209672
    [32] F. Yilmaz, B. Karasözen, An all-at-once approach for the optimal control of the unsteady Burgers equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 259 (2014), 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.06.036 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.06.036
    [33] F. Sahin, E. P. Robinson, Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: review, implications, and directions for future research, Decis. Sci., 33 (2002), 505–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.x
    [34] P. Brandimarte, Multi-item capacitated lot-sizing with demand uncertainty, Int. J. Prod. Res., 44 (2006), 2997–3022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500435116 doi: 10.1080/00207540500435116
    [35] A. Norouzi, R. Uzsoy, Modeling the evolution of dependency between demands, with application to inventory planning, IIE Trans., 46 (2014), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2013.803637 doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2013.803637
    [36] E. Albey, A. Norouzi, K. G. Kempf, R. Uzsoy, Demand modeling with forecast evolution: An application to production planning, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 28 (2015), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2015.2453792 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2015.2453792
    [37] T. Ziarnetzky, L. Mönch, R. Uzsoy, Rolling horizon, multi-product production planning with chance constraints and forecast evolution for wafer fabs, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56 (2018), 6112–6134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1478461 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1478461
    [38] T. Ziarnetzky, L. Mönch, R. Uzsoy, Simulation-based performance assessment of production planning models with safety stock and forecast evolution in semiconductor wafer fabrication, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 33 (2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2019.2958526 doi: 10.1109/TSM.2019.2958526
    [39] D. Kopp, L. Mönch, Hierarchical decision-making for qualification management in wafer fabs: A simulation study, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 20 (2022), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3149735 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3149735
    [40] A. Forel, M. Grunow, Dynamic stochastic lot sizing with forecast evolution in rolling-horizon planning, Prod. Oper. Manag., 32 (2023), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13881 doi: 10.1111/poms.13881
    [41] H. Barman, M. Pervin, S. K. Roy, G. W. Weber, Analysis of a dual-channel green supply chain game-theoretical model under carbon policy, Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist., 10 (2023), 2242770. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2023.2242770 doi: 10.1080/23302674.2023.2242770
    [42] S. Ergün, P. Usta, S. Z. Alparslan Gök, G. W. Weber, A game theoretical approach to emergency logistics planning in natural disasters, Ann. Oper. Res., 324 (2023), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10479-021-04099-9 doi: 10.1007/S10479-021-04099-9
    [43] İ. Özcan, S. Z. Alparslan Gök, G. W. Weber, Peer group situations and games with fuzzy uncertainty, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 20 (2024), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2023084 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2023084
  • jimo-22-10-183-s001.pdf
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(71) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(15)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog