Platform-mediated home healthcare requires coordinated pricing and assignment among clinically and geographically heterogeneous patients and nurses. We develop a price-induced stable matching (PISM) model for a medical institution-affiliated platform that posts a service fee, applies a fixed nurse compensation share, and computes a stable one-to-one assignment. In the single-tier setting, price changes bilateral participation and the mutually acceptable graph without reordering within-tier preferences. On a finite admissible price grid, an optimal fee exists; under explicit local fluid conditions, the profit benchmark exceeds the volume benchmark; and platform profit is invariant across patient- and nurse-proposing stable mechanisms when margins depend only on price and service type. A tiered extension shows how compensation differences can reorder advanced nurses' cross-tier preferences and generate downward substitution. Externally anchored synthetic experiments across six supply–demand and spatial configurations yield nurse rule-conditional price-induced welfare losses of 1.47%–14.41%. Hospital-clustered nurse origins materially increase travel but change the profit-optimal fee only modestly, whereas valuation dispersion has stronger effects on price and completed volume. A two-dimensional price search reveals a nonmonotone relationship between the compensation premium and downward substitution.
Citation: Xiaowei Lin, Yun Wei. Price-induced stable matching in shared healthcare[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(10): 4770-4795. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026165
Platform-mediated home healthcare requires coordinated pricing and assignment among clinically and geographically heterogeneous patients and nurses. We develop a price-induced stable matching (PISM) model for a medical institution-affiliated platform that posts a service fee, applies a fixed nurse compensation share, and computes a stable one-to-one assignment. In the single-tier setting, price changes bilateral participation and the mutually acceptable graph without reordering within-tier preferences. On a finite admissible price grid, an optimal fee exists; under explicit local fluid conditions, the profit benchmark exceeds the volume benchmark; and platform profit is invariant across patient- and nurse-proposing stable mechanisms when margins depend only on price and service type. A tiered extension shows how compensation differences can reorder advanced nurses' cross-tier preferences and generate downward substitution. Externally anchored synthetic experiments across six supply–demand and spatial configurations yield nurse rule-conditional price-induced welfare losses of 1.47%–14.41%. Hospital-clustered nurse origins materially increase travel but change the profit-optimal fee only modestly, whereas valuation dispersion has stronger effects on price and completed volume. A two-dimensional price search reveals a nonmonotone relationship between the compensation premium and downward substitution.
| [1] | National Health Commission of China, Notice on launching the pilot program of "Internet Plus Nursing Services", 2019. Available from: https://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/c100068/201902/5b2c18d54d0c487db84562fe2c780114.shtml. |
| [2] | National Health Commission of China, Notice on further advancing the pilot program of "Internet Plus Nursing Services", 2020. Available from: https://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/c100068/202012/f858a52b12a246649d53531ddc120eab.shtml. |
| [3] |
Y. He, G. Feng, C. Wang, D. Yang, L. Hu, W.-K. Ming, et al., Nurses' job preferences on the Internet Plus Nursing Service program: A discrete choice experiment, BMC Nurs., 23 (2024), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01692-0 doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01692-0
|
| [4] |
J. Yang, B. Ma, S. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, et al., Nurses' preferences for working in Uber-style "Internet Plus" nursing services: A discrete choice experiment, Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 161 (2025), 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104920 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104920
|
| [5] |
A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, A bi-objective green home health care routing problem, J. Clean. Prod., 200 (2018), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.258 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.258
|
| [6] |
C. Fikar, P. Hirsch, Home health care routing and scheduling: A review, Comput. Oper. Res., 77 (2017), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.07.019 doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.07.019
|
| [7] |
M. Reula, C. Parreño-Torres, C. Lamas-Fernandez, A. Martinez-Sykora, A flexible mathematical model for home health care problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 327 (2025), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.055 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.055
|
| [8] |
S. Atta, V. Basto-Fernandes, M. Emmerich, A concise review of the home health care routing and scheduling problem, Oper. Res. Perspect., 15 (2025), 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100347 doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100347
|
| [9] |
D. Khorasanian, J. Patrick, A. Sauré, Dynamic home care routing and scheduling with uncertain number of visits per referral, Transp. Sci., 58 (2024), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0120 doi: 10.1287/trsc.2023.0120
|
| [10] |
M. Lin, L. Ma, C. Ying, Matching daily home health-care demands with supply in service-sharing platforms, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 145 (2021), 102177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102177 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102177
|
| [11] |
Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Jin, C. Jin, F. Hu, T. Yu, An Internet hospital plus home nursing model for chronic disease patients: Mixed-methods study in Tianjin, China, JMIR Nurs., 8 (2025), e76761. https://doi.org/10.2196/76761 doi: 10.2196/76761
|
| [12] |
N. Chen, D. Bai, N. Lv, Towards an integrated online–offline healthcare system: Exploring Chinese patients' preferences for outpatient follow-up visits using a discrete choice experiment, Systems, 12 (2024), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030075 doi: 10.3390/systems12030075
|
| [13] |
N. Chen, D. Bai, J. Ning, A determination of patient preferences for China online outpatient follow-up clinics by using discrete choice experiment: An exploratory study, Front. Public Health, 13 (2025), 1508369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508369 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508369
|
| [14] |
M. Armstrong, Competition in two-sided markets, RAND J. Econ., 37 (2006), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
|
| [15] |
J. C. Rochet, J. Tirole, Platform competition in two-sided markets, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 1 (2003), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212 doi: 10.1162/154247603322493212
|
| [16] |
S. R. Balseiro, D. B. Brown, C. Chen, Dynamic pricing of relocating resources in large networks, Manag. Sci., 67 (2020), 4075–4094. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3735 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3735
|
| [17] |
O. Besbes, F. Castro, I. Lobel, Surge pricing and its spatial supply response, Manag. Sci., 67 (2020), 1350–1367. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3622 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3622
|
| [18] |
K. Bimpikis, O. Candogan, D. Saban, Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks, Oper. Res., 67 (2019), 744–769. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1800 doi: 10.1287/opre.2018.1800
|
| [19] |
G. P. Cachon, K. M. Daniels, R. Lobel, The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., 19 (2017), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0618 doi: 10.1287/msom.2017.0618
|
| [20] |
J. C. Castillo, D. Knoepfle, E. G. Weyl, Matching and pricing in ride hailing: Wild goose chases and how to solve them, Manag. Sci., 71 (2024), 4377–4395. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00096 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.00096
|
| [21] |
Q. Chen, Y. Lei, S. Jasin, Real-time spatial–intertemporal pricing and relocation in a ride-hailing network: Near-optimal policies and the value of dynamic pricing, Oper. Res., 72 (2023), 2097–2118. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2425 doi: 10.1287/opre.2022.2425
|
| [22] |
H. Guda, U. Subramanian, Your Uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives, Manag. Sci., 65 (2019), 1995–2014. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3050 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3050
|
| [23] |
T. A. Taylor, On-demand service platforms, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., 20 (2018), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0678 doi: 10.1287/msom.2017.0678
|
| [24] |
C. Yan, H. Zhu, N. Korolko, D. Woodard, Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms, Naval Res. Logist., 67 (2020), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21872 doi: 10.1002/nav.21872
|
| [25] |
D. Gale, L. S. Shapley, College admissions and the stability of marriage, Amer. Math. Monthly, 69 (1962), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827 doi: 10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827
|
| [26] |
A. E. Roth, The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory, J. Political Econ., 92 (1984), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1086/261272 doi: 10.1086/261272
|
| [27] |
A. E. Roth, On the allocation of residents to rural hospitals: A general property of two-sided matching markets, Econometrica, 54 (1986), 425–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913160 doi: 10.2307/1913160
|
| [28] | J. W. Hatfield, P. R. Milgrom, Matching with contracts, Amer. Econ. Rev., 95 (2005), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825466 |
| [29] | A. S. Kelso, V. P. Crawford, Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes, Econometrica, 50 (1982), 1483–1504. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913392 |
| [30] |
J. H. Blanchet, M. I. Reiman, V. Shah, L. M. Wein, L. Wu, Asymptotically optimal control of a centralized dynamic matching market with general utilities, Oper. Res., 70 (2022), 3355–3370. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2186 doi: 10.1287/opre.2021.2186
|
| [31] | R. Johari, V. Kamble, Y. Kanoria, Matching while learning, Oper. Res., 69 (2021), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2013 |
| [32] |
Y. Kanoria, D. Saban, Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms, Manag. Sci., 67 (2021), 5990–6029. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3794 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3794
|
| [33] |
E. Özkan, A. R. Ward, Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing, Stoch. Syst., 10 (2020), 29–70. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsy.2019.0037 doi: 10.1287/stsy.2019.0037
|
| [34] |
S. M. Varma, P. Bumpensanti, S. T. Maguluri, H. Wang, Dynamic pricing and matching for two-sided queues, Oper. Res., 71 (2022), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2233 doi: 10.1287/opre.2021.2233
|
| [35] |
A. Bassamboo, J. M. Harrison, A. Zeevi, Design and control of a large call center: Asymptotic analysis of an LP-based method, Oper. Res., 54 (2006), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0285 doi: 10.1287/opre.1060.0285
|
| [36] |
I. Gurvich, M. Armony, C. Maglaras, Cross-selling in a call center with a heterogeneous customer population, Oper. Res., 57 (2009), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0568 doi: 10.1287/opre.1080.0568
|
| [37] | National Healthcare Security Administration of China, Implementation of home medical service pricing policies: New development in inclusive and convenient health care, 2026. Available from: https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2026/4/24/art_14_20316.html. |
jimo-22-10-165-s001.pdf |
![]() |