Due to changes in consumer perception of green agricultural products over time, consumers may raise skepticism about the greenness of agricultural products, and consumers' skepticism will affect their willingness to purchase green agricultural products. In this paper, we incorporated the greenness reference effect, consumer skepticism, and the type of agricultural products into a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one cooperative and one retailer. We used the differential game theory to analyze the improvement effects of cost sharing contract led by the retailer and members' altruistic behaviors on the supply chain. The results were as follows: First, when the reference effect was highly correlated with the retailer's advertising and protection, restrained the retailer's efforts in advertising and protecting green agricultural products. Second, the retailer was more effective in advertising and protecting credence type green agricultural products than experience type green agricultural products. Third, when the types of agricultural products were different, the optimal decisions of supply chain members affected by the greenness reference effect were also different. The greenness of cooperative's products and the retailer's advertising and protection had an opposite correlation with the impact coefficient of reference greenness on consumer skepticism. Fourth, when the retailer's marginal profit was high, the cost sharing contract could improve the total profits of the supply chain. Fifth, the supply chain members' altruistic behaviors could effectively reduce consumers' skepticism on the greenness of agricultural products and improve the total profits of the supply chain.
Citation: Weifan Jiang, Siyu Wu, Chengxiang Wu, Jinli Zhang, Qin Li. Green agricultural product operations strategies considering consumer skepticism under different supply chain modes[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(5): 2272-2300. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026083
Due to changes in consumer perception of green agricultural products over time, consumers may raise skepticism about the greenness of agricultural products, and consumers' skepticism will affect their willingness to purchase green agricultural products. In this paper, we incorporated the greenness reference effect, consumer skepticism, and the type of agricultural products into a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one cooperative and one retailer. We used the differential game theory to analyze the improvement effects of cost sharing contract led by the retailer and members' altruistic behaviors on the supply chain. The results were as follows: First, when the reference effect was highly correlated with the retailer's advertising and protection, restrained the retailer's efforts in advertising and protecting green agricultural products. Second, the retailer was more effective in advertising and protecting credence type green agricultural products than experience type green agricultural products. Third, when the types of agricultural products were different, the optimal decisions of supply chain members affected by the greenness reference effect were also different. The greenness of cooperative's products and the retailer's advertising and protection had an opposite correlation with the impact coefficient of reference greenness on consumer skepticism. Fourth, when the retailer's marginal profit was high, the cost sharing contract could improve the total profits of the supply chain. Fifth, the supply chain members' altruistic behaviors could effectively reduce consumers' skepticism on the greenness of agricultural products and improve the total profits of the supply chain.
| [1] |
P. Nelson, Information and consumer behavior, J. Polit. Econ., 78 (1970), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/259630 doi: 10.1086/259630
|
| [2] |
M. Darby, E. Karni, Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud, J. Law Econ., 16 (1973), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/466756 doi: 10.1086/466756
|
| [3] |
H. Zhou, Y. Duan, Online channel structures for green products with reference greenness effect and consumer environmental awareness (CEA), Comput. Ind. Eng., 170 (2022), 108350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108350 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108350
|
| [4] |
Y. He, J. Zhang, Q. Gou, G. Bi, Supply chain decisions with reference quality effect under the O2O environment, Ann. Oper. Res., 268 (2018), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2224-2 doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2224-2
|
| [5] |
P. Liu, Y. Long, H. Song, Y. He, Investment decision and coordination of green agri-food supply chain considering information service based on blockchain and big data, J. Cleaner Prod., 277 (2020), 123646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123646 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123646
|
| [6] |
J. Shen, A green supply chain with sales effort under a cost-sharing contract, Mathematics, 12 (2024), 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101435 doi: 10.3390/math12101435
|
| [7] |
Y. Wang, Z. Yu, M. Jin, J. Mao, Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 293 (2021), 910–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.060 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.060
|
| [8] |
T. Ji, X. Xu, X. Yan, Y. Yu, The production decisions and cap setting with wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts under cap-and-trade regulation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 58 (2020), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641239 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1641239
|
| [9] |
A. Sharma, D. Jain, Game-theoretic analysis of green supply chain under cost-sharing contract with fairness concerns, Int. Game Theory Rev., 23 (2021), 2050017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198920500176 doi: 10.1142/S0219198920500176
|
| [10] |
X. Xi, Y. Zhang, Complexity analysis of production, fertilizer-saving level, and emission reduction efforts decisions in a two-parallel agricultural product supply chain, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 152 (2021), 111358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111358 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111358
|
| [11] |
Y. Cao, L. Tao, K. Wu, G. Wan, Coordinating joint greening efforts in an agri-food supply chain with environmentally sensitive demand, J. Cleaner Prod., 277 (2020), 123883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123883 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123883
|
| [12] |
B. Yan, Y. Chen, S. He, Decision making and coordination of fresh agriculture product supply chain considering fairness concerns, RAIRO-Oper. Res., 54 (2020), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019031 doi: 10.1051/ro/2019031
|
| [13] |
W. Jiang, C. Wu, Y. Tian, J. Xie, Logistics mode selection of agricultural products based on fairness concerns, Oper. Res. Int. J., 25 (2025), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00938-w doi: 10.1007/s12351-025-00938-w
|
| [14] |
S. Thomas, S. Kureshi, Consumer skepticism towards cause related marketing: exploring the consumer tendency to question from emerging market perspective, Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark., 17 (2020), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00244-5 doi: 10.1007/s12208-020-00244-5
|
| [15] |
F. Moreno, J. Kang, How to alleviate consumer skepticism concerning corporate responsibility: The role of content and delivery in CSR communications, Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Ma., 27 (2020), 2477–2490. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1969 doi: 10.1002/csr.1969
|
| [16] |
Y. Cho, C. Ye, Y. Kim, Instilling label confidence in the minds of consumers: the role of sustainability skepticism, J. Consum. Behav., 23 (2024), 1752–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2300 doi: 10.1002/cb.2300
|
| [17] |
Y. Farooq, H. Wicaksono, Advancing on the analysis of causes and consequences of green skepticism, J. Cleaner Prod., 320 (2021), 128927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128927 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128927
|
| [18] |
X. Li, Z. Ding, Decision-making mechanisms of greenwashing behaviors of building materials manufacturers: a media disclosure and consumer skepticism perspective, Environ. Technol. Inno., 35 (2024), 103705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103705 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103705
|
| [19] |
Y. Liu, V. Shankar, The dynamic impact of product-harm crises on brand preference and advertising effectiveness: An empirical analysis of the automobile industry, Manage. Sci., 61 (2015), 2514–2535. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2095 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2095
|
| [20] |
X. Chen, P. Hu, Z. Hu, Efficient algorithms for the dynamic pricing problem with reference price effect, Manage. Sci., 63 (2017), 4389–4408. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2554 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2554
|
| [21] |
R. Wang, When prospect theory meets consumer choice models: assortment and pricing management with reference prices, M. Som. Manuf. Serv. Op., 20 (2018), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0688 doi: 10.1287/msom.2017.0688
|
| [22] |
A. Den Boer, N. Keskin, Dynamic pricing with demand learning and reference effects, Manage. Sci., 68 (2022), 7112–7130. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4234 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4234
|
| [23] |
R. Qiu, Y. Yu, M. Sun, Supply chain coordination by contracts considering dynamic reference quality effect under the O2O environment, Comput. Ind. Eng., 163 (2022), 107802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107802 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107802
|
| [24] |
M. Costanigro, Y. Onozaka, A belief-preference model of choice for experience and credence goods, J. Agr. Econ., 71 (2020), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12334 doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12334
|
| [25] |
R. Kerschbamer, D. Neururer, M. Sutter, Credence goods markets, online information and repair prices: a natural field experiment, J. Public Econo., 222 (2023), 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104891 doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104891
|
| [26] |
J. Hall, R. Kerschbamer, D. Neururer, E. Skoog, Uncovering sophisticated discrimination with the help of credence goods markups: evidence from a natural field experiment, Manage. Sci., 71 (2025), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02666 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.02666
|
| [27] |
Y. Wang, Z. Yu, L. Shen, W. Dong, E-commerce supply chain models under altruistic preference, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060632 doi: 10.3390/math9060632
|
| [28] |
H. Wang, X. Fan, J. Guo, Q. Zhao, Z. Dai, Towards sustainable beef: the role of altruistic preference in the value chain transformation, Food Policy, 127 (2024), 102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102687 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102687
|
| [29] |
J. Zhu, Y. Lu, T. Feng, The influence of the altruistic preferences of e-commerce platforms on the carbon emission reduction of manufacturers, Electron. Commer. Res., 25 (2025), 1255–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09720-6 doi: 10.1007/s10660-023-09720-6
|
| [30] |
T. Yu, Z. Guan, J. Zhang, J. Dong, Blockchain adoption and contract coordination of poverty alleviation supply chain considering altruistic preference, Comput. Ind. Eng., 188 (2024), 109879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109879 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109879
|
| [31] |
L. Hellofs, R. Jacobson, Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: when can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality?, J. Marketing, 63 (1999), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300102 doi: 10.1177/002224299906300102
|
| [32] |
N. Sahni, H. Nair, Does advertising serve as a signal? Evidence from a field experiment in mobile search, Rev. Econ. Stud., 87 (2020), 1529–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz053 doi: 10.1093/restud/rdz053
|
jimo-22-05-083-s001.pdf |
![]() |