Environmental uncertainties present significant challenges to sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), and often result in elevated costs, unsustainable production practices, and operational disruptions. In this study, we present a novel sustainable supply chain model with multiple objectives, utilizing the Golden Eagle Algorithm (GEA) for optimization. The model simultaneously addressed economic, environmental, and operational objectives, which included production, transportation, inventory management, shortages, recycling, and pollution mitigation. To manage the inherent complexity and uncertainty of decision variables, a descriptive-analytical research methodology was employed. Given the large-scale, NP-hard nature of the problem, exact solution methods, or commercial optimization software, such as GAMS and Simplex, proved infeasible. The GEA was implemented with parameters calibrated via the Taguchi method (Max Iterations = 23, Population Size = 40, Attack Propensity = 1.7–2, Cruise Propensity = 0.5–1). Ten randomly generated problem instances were used to rigorously evaluate algorithmic performance. Algorithm performance was assessed using multiple metrics, including MID (convergence), DM, NPS, and SNS (diversity and spread). Our results demonstrated that the GEA effectively explored the solution space, avoids local optima, and produces high-quality solutions. In smaller-scale problems (Example 8), the algorithm exhibited superior computational efficiency, whereas in larger-scale instances (Example 10), it achieved enhanced solution diversity (high DM) alongside effective convergence. These findings indicated that the model is feasible, robust, and practically applicable, and provides supply chain managers with a trustworthy tool to support their decision-making. Furthermore, the model's efficiency was demonstrated through numerical calculations.
Citation: Massoumeh Nazari. Optimization of a bi-objective sustainable supply chain model under uncertainty based on the Internet of Things[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(3): 1519-1538. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026056
Environmental uncertainties present significant challenges to sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), and often result in elevated costs, unsustainable production practices, and operational disruptions. In this study, we present a novel sustainable supply chain model with multiple objectives, utilizing the Golden Eagle Algorithm (GEA) for optimization. The model simultaneously addressed economic, environmental, and operational objectives, which included production, transportation, inventory management, shortages, recycling, and pollution mitigation. To manage the inherent complexity and uncertainty of decision variables, a descriptive-analytical research methodology was employed. Given the large-scale, NP-hard nature of the problem, exact solution methods, or commercial optimization software, such as GAMS and Simplex, proved infeasible. The GEA was implemented with parameters calibrated via the Taguchi method (Max Iterations = 23, Population Size = 40, Attack Propensity = 1.7–2, Cruise Propensity = 0.5–1). Ten randomly generated problem instances were used to rigorously evaluate algorithmic performance. Algorithm performance was assessed using multiple metrics, including MID (convergence), DM, NPS, and SNS (diversity and spread). Our results demonstrated that the GEA effectively explored the solution space, avoids local optima, and produces high-quality solutions. In smaller-scale problems (Example 8), the algorithm exhibited superior computational efficiency, whereas in larger-scale instances (Example 10), it achieved enhanced solution diversity (high DM) alongside effective convergence. These findings indicated that the model is feasible, robust, and practically applicable, and provides supply chain managers with a trustworthy tool to support their decision-making. Furthermore, the model's efficiency was demonstrated through numerical calculations.
| [1] |
S. Qu, Y. Ji, Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Optimization, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043844 doi: 10.3390/su15043844
|
| [2] |
D. Das, Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance, J. Cleaner Prod., 164 (2017), 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006
|
| [3] |
Z. N. Ansari, R. Kant, A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management, J. Cleaner Prod., 142 (2017), 2524–2543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023
|
| [4] |
P. C. Sauer, S. Seuring, Extending the reach of multi-tier sustainable supply chain management–insights from mineral supply chains, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 217 (2019), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.030 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.030
|
| [5] |
Z. Homayouni, M. S. Pishvaee, H. Jahani, D. Ivanov, A robust-heuristic optimization approach to a green supply chain design with consideration of assorted vehicle types and carbon policies under uncertainty, Ann. Oper. Res., 324 (2023), 395–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03985-6 doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-03985-6
|
| [6] | A. Morovati Sharifabadi, S. H. Mirghafouri, S. H. Mir Fakhreddini, Designing a probabilistic model of sustainable supply chain in the electricity industry with the influence of renewable products, Organ. Resour. Manag. Res., 11 (2021), 105–128. |
| [7] |
E. Shekarian, B. Ijadi, A. Zare, J. Majava, Sustainable supply chain management: a comprehensive systematic review of industrial practices, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 7892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137892 doi: 10.3390/su14137892
|
| [8] |
W. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, G. Gao, H. Zhang, Incentive mechanisms in a green supply chain under demand uncertainty, J. Cleaner Prod., 279 (2021), 123636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123636 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123636
|
| [9] |
M. Yang, S. Qu, Y. Ji, Z. Peng, Risk management of the vaccine supply chain: Interactions of risk factors and control strategies, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 98 (2025), 102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102153 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102153
|
| [10] |
S. T. John, R. Sridharan, P. R. Kumar, Multi-period reverse logistics network design with emission cost, Int. J. Logist. Manag., 28 (2017), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2015-0143 doi: 10.1108/IJLM-08-2015-0143
|
| [11] |
F. Sgarbossa, I. Russo, A proactive model in sustainable food supply chain: Insight from a case study, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183 (2017), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.022 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.022
|
| [12] |
N. M. Modak, P. Kelle, Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 272 (2019), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.067 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.067
|
| [13] |
A. Jabbarzadeh, B. Fahimnia, F. Sabouhi, Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56 (2018), 5945–5968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1461950 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1461950
|
| [14] |
K. Shaw, M. Irfan, R. Shankar, S. S. Yadav, Low carbon chance constrained supply chain network design problem: a Benders decomposition based approach, Computers Ind. Eng., 98 (2016), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.011
|
| [15] |
H. Golpîra, E. Najafi, M. Zandieh, S. Sadi-Nezhad, Robust bi-level optimization for green opportunistic supply chain network design problem against uncertainty and environmental risk, Computers Ind. Eng., 107 (2017), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.029 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.029
|
| [16] |
B. Zahiri, P. Jula, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Design of a pharmaceutical supply chain network under uncertainty considering perishability and substitutability of products, Inf. Sci., 423 (2018), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.046 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.046
|
| [17] |
H. Heidari-Fathian, S. H. R. Pasandideh, Green-blood supply chain network design: Robust optimization, bounded objective function & Lagrangian relaxation, Computers Ind. Eng., 122 (2018), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.051 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.051
|
| [18] | M. Afshar, S. H. Molana, B. R. Parchicolaie, A multi objective optimization model for multi-commodity closed-loop supply chain network considering disruption risk, Int. J. Eng., 37 (2024), 646–661. |
| [19] |
K. Nagasawa, Y. Kinoshita, K. Morikawa, K. Takahashi, Design of a robust closed-loop supply chain with backup suppliers under disruption scenarios, J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf., 17 (2023), JAMDSM0059. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2023jamdsm0059 doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.2023jamdsm0059
|
| [20] |
A. Barman, H. Lekhadiya, S. Giri, T. Mandanaka, Product pricing and return refund strategy in two layer supply chain, AIP Conf. Proc., 2943 (2023), 020030. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183520 doi: 10.1063/5.0183520
|
| [21] |
Y. Fernando, M. F. Ahmad Jasmi, I. S. Wahyuni-TD, F. Mergeresa, K. Azman Khamis, A. Fakhrorazi, et al., Supply chain integration and halal frozen meat product returns, J. Islam. Mark., 14 (2023), 1369–1395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2021-0144 doi: 10.1108/JIMA-05-2021-0144
|
| [22] |
A. Goli, E. Babaee Tirkolaee, A. M. Golmohammadi, Z. Atan, G. W. Weber, S. S. Ali, A robust optimization model to design an IoT-based sustainable supply chain network with flexibility, Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 33 (2025), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00870-4 doi: 10.1007/s10100-023-00870-4
|
| [23] |
A. W. Al-Khatib, The impact of industrial Internet of things on sustainable performance: the indirect effect of supply chain visibility, Bus. Process Manag. J., 29 (2023), 1607–1629. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2023-0198 doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2023-0198
|
| [24] |
V. Shahbazbegian, S. M. Hosseini-Motlagh, A. Haeri, Integrated forward/reverse logistics thin-film photovoltaic power plant supply chain network design with uncertain data, Appl. Energy, 277 (2020), 115538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115538 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115538
|
| [25] |
W. Ahmed, B. Sarkar, Impact of carbon emissions in a sustainable supply chain management for a second generation biofuel, J. Cleaner Prod., 186 (2018), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.289 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.289
|
| [26] |
M. Talaei, B. F. Moghaddam, M. S. Pishvaee, A. Bozorgi-Amiri, S. Gholamnejad, A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry, J. Cleaner Prod., 113 (2016), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.074 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.074
|
| [27] |
S. Mohseni, M. S. Pishvaee, A robust programming approach towards design and optimization of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain, Computers Ind. Eng., 100 (2016), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.003
|
| [28] |
S. Bairamzadeh, M. Saidi-Mehrabad, M. S. Pishvaee, Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: A robust optimization approach, Renew. Energy, 116 (2018), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.020 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.020
|
| [29] |
M. Sherafati, M. Bashiri, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. S. Pishvaee, Supply chain network design considering sustainable development paradigm: A case study in cable industry, J. Cleaner Prod., 234 (2019), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095
|
| [30] |
E. Dehghani, M. S. Jabalameli, A. Jabbarzadeh, M. S. Pishvaee, Resilient solar photovoltaic supply chain network design under business-as-usual and hazard uncertainties, Computers Chem. Eng., 111 (2018), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.013 doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.013
|
| [31] |
A. Khosrojerdi, S. H. Zegordi, J. K. Allen, F. Mistree, A method for designing power supply chain networks accounting for failure scenarios and preventive maintenance, Engin. Optim., 48 (2016), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.998662 doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2014.998662
|
| [32] |
M. Fattahi, K. Govindan, A multi-stage stochastic program for the sustainable design of biofuel supply chain networks under biomass supply uncertainty and disruption risk: A real-life case study, Transp. Res. P. Logist. Transp. Rev., 118 (2018), 534–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.08.008
|