Research article Special Issues

Evaluation of barriers toward data-driven supply chain sustainability via Single-Valued Pythagorean PIPRECIA

  • Published: 05 February 2026
  • 90C70, 90B99

  • Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) is a holistic approach that encompasses economic, social, and environmental dimensions, enabling firms to enhance their long-term competitiveness by meeting legal requirements and strengthening brand equity. The effective implementation of this approach necessitates a strong emphasis on data-driven decision-making. Accordingly, we aimed to identify the key barriers hindering the implementation of data-driven sustainable supply chain practices and to explore potential strategies to overcome these challenges. In the initial phase of the study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the major barriers to implementing data-driven sustainable supply chains. Subsequently, the relative importance of these barriers was assessed with input from top and mid-level managers working in manufacturing sector enterprises. The identified barriers were then prioritized using the Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) method based on Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. Finally, solution proposals were developed to address the most critical barriers. The study revealed that organizational barriers constitute the most prominent category, representing 29.86% of the total identified obstacles. Closely following are technical barriers, which account for 26.41% and reflect the difficulties associated with implementing and integrating digital technologies. Internal and external environmental barriers are similarly substantial, comprising 25.87% of the total. In comparison, economic barriers make up the smallest share, with a relative weight of 17.86%. The number of researchers analyzing the importance weights of barriers in the context of SSCM 4.0 remains limited. The utilization of a more contemporary and robust method compared to previously applied techniques for determining these weights enhances the originality of this study.

    Citation: Hakan Turan, Elif Çaloğlu Büyükselçuk. Evaluation of barriers toward data-driven supply chain sustainability via Single-Valued Pythagorean PIPRECIA[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(3): 1214-1243. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026045

    Related Papers:

  • Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) is a holistic approach that encompasses economic, social, and environmental dimensions, enabling firms to enhance their long-term competitiveness by meeting legal requirements and strengthening brand equity. The effective implementation of this approach necessitates a strong emphasis on data-driven decision-making. Accordingly, we aimed to identify the key barriers hindering the implementation of data-driven sustainable supply chain practices and to explore potential strategies to overcome these challenges. In the initial phase of the study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the major barriers to implementing data-driven sustainable supply chains. Subsequently, the relative importance of these barriers was assessed with input from top and mid-level managers working in manufacturing sector enterprises. The identified barriers were then prioritized using the Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) method based on Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. Finally, solution proposals were developed to address the most critical barriers. The study revealed that organizational barriers constitute the most prominent category, representing 29.86% of the total identified obstacles. Closely following are technical barriers, which account for 26.41% and reflect the difficulties associated with implementing and integrating digital technologies. Internal and external environmental barriers are similarly substantial, comprising 25.87% of the total. In comparison, economic barriers make up the smallest share, with a relative weight of 17.86%. The number of researchers analyzing the importance weights of barriers in the context of SSCM 4.0 remains limited. The utilization of a more contemporary and robust method compared to previously applied techniques for determining these weights enhances the originality of this study.



    加载中


    [1] M. L. Tseng, T. D. Bui, M. K. Lim, M. Fujii, U. Mishra, Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 245 (2022), No. 108401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108401 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108401
    [2] H. Gupta, S. Kusi-Sarpang, J. Rezaer, Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 161 (2020), No. 104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819
    [3] S. A. Khan, S. Kusi-Sarpong, H. Gupta, F. K. Arhin, J. N. Lawal, S. M. Hassan, Critical factors of digital supply chains for organizational performance improvement, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 71 (2024), 13727–13741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3052239 doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3052239
    [4] Y. D. Ozkan-Ozen, D. Sezer, M. Ozbiltekin-Pala, Y. Kazancoglu, Risks of data-driven technologies in sustainable supply chain management, Manag. Environ. Qual.: Int. J., 34 (2023), 926–942. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2022-0051 doi: 10.1108/MEQ-03-2022-0051
    [5] X. Li, Y. Li, G. Li, J. Xu, Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance: The moderating effect of stakeholder pressure, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 12 (2025), No. 336. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04676-4 doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04676-4
    [6] L. K. Toke, S. D. Kalpande, Critical analysis of green accounting and reporting practises and its implication in the context of Indian automobile industry, Environ. Develop. Sustain., 26 (2024), 3243–3268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02816-3 doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02816-3
    [7] Y. S. Chen, The driver of green innovation and green image-green core competence, J. Bus. Ethics, 81 (2008), 5311–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1 doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
    [8] H. B. Ahmadi, S. Kusi-Sarpang, J. Rezaer, Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 126 (2017), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020
    [9] D. Hariyani, P. Hariyani, S. Mishra, M. Kumar Sharma, A literature review on green supply chain management for sustainable sourcing and distribution, Waste Manag. Bullet., 2 (2024), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2024.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.wmb.2024.11.009
    [10] J. Mageto, Big data analytics in sustainable supply chain management: A focus on manufacturing supply chains, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137101 doi: 10.3390/su13137101
    [11] C. Liu, P. Rani, K. Pachori, Sustainable circular supplier selection and evaluation in the manufacturing sector using Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 35 (2022), 1040–1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2021-0187 doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2021-0187
    [12] M. Yang, M. Fu, Z. Zhang, The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: drivers, process and impact, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 169 (2021), No. 120795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120795 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120795
    [13] I. Laguir, S. Modgil, I. Bose, S. Gupta, R. Stekelorum, Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty, Ann. Oper. Res., 324 (2023), 1269–1293, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04484-4. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04484-4
    [14] M. Soori, F. K. G. Jough, R. Dastres, B. Arezoo, Blockchains for industrial Internet of Things in sustainable supply chain management of industry 4.0, a review, Sustain. Manufact. Serv. Econ., 3 (2024), No. 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2024.100026 doi: 10.1016/j.smse.2024.100026
    [15] R. Chalmeta, N. J. Santos-deLeón, Sustainable supply chain in the era of industry 4.0 and big data: A systematic analysis of literature and research, Sustainability, 12 (2020), 4108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104108 doi: 10.3390/su12104108
    [16] M. Koot, M. R. K. Mes, M. E. Iacob, A systematic literature review of supply chain decision making supported by the Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics, Comput. Indust. Eng., 154 (2021), No. 107076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107076 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107076
    [17] M. A. Rahman, P. Saha, H. M. Belal, S. Hasan Ratul, G. Graham, Big data analytics capability and supply chain sustainability: analyzing the moderating role of green supply chain management practices, Benchmark.: An Int. J., (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2024-0852 doi: 10.1108/BIJ-10-2024-0852
    [18] A. Fayyaz, C. Liu, Y. Xu, F. Khan, S. Ahmed, Untangling the cumulative impact of big data analytics, green lean six sigma and sustainable supply chain management on the economic performance of manufacturing organisations, Prod. Plan. Cont., 36 (2024), 1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2024.2348517 doi: 10.1080/09537287.2024.2348517
    [19] R. Agrawal, N. Islam, A. Samadhiya, V. Shukla, A. Kumar, A. Upadhyay, Paving the way to environmental sustainability: A systematic review to integrate big data analytics into high-stake decision forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 214 (2025), No. 124060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124060 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124060
    [20] E. O. Zayed, E. A. Yaseen, Barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation in Egyptian industries: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach, Manag. Environ. Qual., 32 (2021), 1192–1209. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0271 doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0271
    [21] M. G. Samper, D. G. Florez, J. R. Borre, J. Ramirez, Industry 4.0 for sustainable supply chain management: Drivers and barriers, Procedia Comput. Sci., 203 (2022), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.094 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.094
    [22] R. R. Menon, V. Ravi, An analysis of barriers affecting implementation of sustainable supply chain management in electronics industry: a Grey-DEMATEL approach, J. Model. Manag., 17 (2022), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2021-0042 doi: 10.1108/JM2-02-2021-0042
    [23] A. Kumar, S. K. Mangla, P. Kumar, Barriers for adoption of Industry 4.0 in sustainable food supply chain: a circular economy perspective, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., 73 (2024), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0695 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0695
    [24] N. Oelze, Sustainable supply chain management implementation–enablers and barriers in the textile industry, Sustainability, 9 (2017), 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081435 doi: 10.3390/su9081435
    [25] F. Delgado, S. Garrido, B. S. Bezerra, Barriers to visibility in supply chains: challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence driven by Industry 4.0 technologies, Sustainability, 17 (2025), 2998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072998 doi: 10.3390/su17072998
    [26] C. Liang, D. Sun, D. Xie, Identifying waste supply chain coordination barriers with Fuzzy MCDM, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 5352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065352 doi: 10.3390/su15065352
    [27] S. Lahane, R. Kant, Evaluating the circular supply chain implementation barriers using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-DEMATEL approach, Clean. Logis. Supply Chain, 2 (2021), No.100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100014 doi: 10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100014
    [28] D. Barua, A. Jain, V. Jain, An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of barriers in implementing LARS paradigms in supply chain, In: A. Tiwari, K. Ahuja, A. Yadav, J. C. Bansal, K. Deep, A. K. Nagar (eds), Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1393, Springer, 2021, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2712-5_52
    [29] A. K. Singh, V. R. P. Kumar, M. Irfan, S. R. Mohandes, U. Awan, Revealing the barriers of blockchain technology for supply chain transparency and sustainability in the construction industry: An application of Pythagorean FAHP methods, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 10681. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310681 doi: 10.3390/su151310681
    [30] D. Deral, Ş. G. Köse, İ. Kazançoğlu, Barriers to digital supply chain management: A qualitative research, Yildiz Soc. Sci. Rev., 10 (2024). No.1. https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1480396 doi: 10.51803/yssr.1480396
    [31] G. Grambow, N. Mundbrod, J. Kolb, M. Reichert, Towards collecting sustainability data in supply chains with flexible data collection processes, In: P. Ceravolo, R. Accorsi, P. Cudre-Mauroux (eds), Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis. SIMPDA 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46436-6_2
    [32] P. S. Mahajan, R. Agrawal, R. D. Raut, State-of-the-art perspectives on data-driven sustainable supply chain: A bibliometric and network analysis approach, J. Clean. Prod., 430 (2023), No. 139727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139727 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139727
    [33] N. Durmaz, A. Budak, Analysing key barriers to Industry 4.0 for sustainable supply chain management, J. Intel. Fuzzy Syst., 43 (2022), 6663–6682. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-220732 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-220732
    [34] A. Sayem, P. K. Biswas, M. M. A. Khan, L. Romoli, M. Dalle Mura, Critical barriers to industry 4.0 adoption in manufacturing organizations and their mitigation strategies, J. Manufact. Materials Process., 6 (2022), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6060136 doi: 10.3390/jmmp6060136
    [35] O. Layode, H. N. N. Naiho, T. T. Labake, G. S. Adeleke, E. O. Udeh, E. Johnson, Addressing cybersecurity challenges in sustainable supply chain management: A review of current practices and future directions, Int. J. Manag. Entr. Res., 6 (2024), 1954–1981. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i6.1208 doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i6.1208
    [36] M. Aarland, Cybersecurity in digital supply chains in the procurement process: Introducing the digital supply chain management framework, Inform. Comput. Secur., 33 (2025), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-10-2023-0198 doi: 10.1108/ICS-10-2023-0198
    [37] D. Delmonico, C. J. C. Jabbour, S. C. F. Pereira, A. B. L. de Sousa Jabbour, D. W. S. Renwick, A. M. T. Thomé, Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134 (2018), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033
    [38] M. Jalali, B. Feng, J. Feng, An analysis of barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: The fuzzy DEMATEL approach, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 13622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013622 doi: 10.3390/su142013622
    [39] A. E. Narayanan, R. Sridharan, P. N. Ram Kumar, Analyzing the interactions among barriers of sustainable supply chain management practices: a case study, J. Manufact. Technol. Manag., 30 (2018), 937–971. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0114. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0114
    [40] A. Neri, E. Cagno, G. Di Sebastiano, A. Trianni, Industrial sustainability: Modelling drivers and mechanisms with barriers, J. Clean. Prod., 194 (2018), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.140 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.140
    [41] N. Bhanot, P. V. Rao, S. G. Deshmukh, An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing, J. Clean. Prod., 142 (2017), 4412–4439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.123 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.123
    [42] R. Stewart, N. Bey, C. Boks, Exploration of the barriers to implementing different types of sustainability approaches, Procedia CIRP, 48 (2016), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.063 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.063
    [43] P. Agrawal, R. Narain, I. Ullah, Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach, J. Model. Manag., 15 (2020), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2019-0066 doi: 10.1108/JM2-03-2019-0066
    [44] M. Alquraish, Digital transformation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability: A comprehensive review with implications for Saudi Arabian manufacturing, Sustainability, 17 (2025), 4495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104495 doi: 10.3390/su17104495
    [45] R. R. Yager, Pythagorean Fuzzy Subsets. In Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 24–28 June 2013; 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
    [46] R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2014), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
    [47] X. L. Zhang, Z. S. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to Multicriteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29 (2014), 1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676 doi: 10.1002/int.21676
    [48] P. Rani, D. Pamucar, A. R. Mishra, I. M. Hezam, J. Ali, S. H. Ahammad, An integrated interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WISP approach for industry 4.0 technology assessment and digital transformation, Ann. Oper. Res., 342 (2024), 1235–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05355-w doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05355-w
    [49] D. Stanujkic, E. K. Zavadskas, D. Karabasevic, F. Smarandache, Z. Turskis, The use of the pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment method for determining the weights of criteria, Romanian J. Econ. Forecast., 20 (2017), 116–133.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(596) PDF downloads(26) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(11)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog