Research article Special Issues

Model order reduction using dual $ \nu $-gap metrics: A multi-objective optimization approach

  • Published: 15 January 2026
  • This study investigated the problem of model order reduction by employing the $ \nu $-gap metric and introduced a metaheuristic optimization framework to address its inherent nonconvexity. The $ \nu $-gap metric quantifies the closed-loop distance between two systems, making it useful for generating low-order models that preserve closed-loop stability characteristics. However, minimizing the conventional $ \nu $-gap alone may result in poor dynamic fidelity. To address this limitation, a modified $ \nu $-gap metric based on frequency response matching was developed to explicitly capture frequency-wise discrepancies associated with time-domain behavior. By jointly considering the conventional and modified $ \nu $-gap metrics, a dual $ \nu $-gap–based multi-objective model reduction framework was formulated, in which stability-related and time-domain fidelity objectives are treated in a complementary manner. The resulting optimization problem is highly nonconvex and constrained due to the winding number condition. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework was therefore employed as a numerical tool to generate Pareto-optimal reduced-order models. Benchmark studies on large-scale systems demonstrated that the proposed framework enables a systematic exploration of trade-offs between stability preservation and time-domain fidelity, yielding practically meaningful reduced-order models with tunable performance characteristics.

    Citation: Mingyu Kim, Sukyung Seo, Suhwan Choi, Yeongjae Kim, Yeongmi Kim, Tae-Hyoung Kim. Model order reduction using dual $ \nu $-gap metrics: A multi-objective optimization approach[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2026, 34(1): 433-462. doi: 10.3934/era.2026021

    Related Papers:

  • This study investigated the problem of model order reduction by employing the $ \nu $-gap metric and introduced a metaheuristic optimization framework to address its inherent nonconvexity. The $ \nu $-gap metric quantifies the closed-loop distance between two systems, making it useful for generating low-order models that preserve closed-loop stability characteristics. However, minimizing the conventional $ \nu $-gap alone may result in poor dynamic fidelity. To address this limitation, a modified $ \nu $-gap metric based on frequency response matching was developed to explicitly capture frequency-wise discrepancies associated with time-domain behavior. By jointly considering the conventional and modified $ \nu $-gap metrics, a dual $ \nu $-gap–based multi-objective model reduction framework was formulated, in which stability-related and time-domain fidelity objectives are treated in a complementary manner. The resulting optimization problem is highly nonconvex and constrained due to the winding number condition. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework was therefore employed as a numerical tool to generate Pareto-optimal reduced-order models. Benchmark studies on large-scale systems demonstrated that the proposed framework enables a systematic exploration of trade-offs between stability preservation and time-domain fidelity, yielding practically meaningful reduced-order models with tunable performance characteristics.



    加载中


    [1] R. Kumar, D. Ezhilarasi, A state-of-the-art survey of model order reduction techniques for large-scale coupled dynamical systems, Int. J. Dyn. Control, 11 (2023), 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-00985-7 doi: 10.1007/s40435-022-00985-7
    [2] S. K. Suman, A. Kumar, Investigation and implementation of model order reduction technique for large scale dynamical systems, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 29 (2022), 3087–3108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09690-8 doi: 10.1007/s11831-021-09690-8
    [3] K. Lu, K. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Gu, Y. Jin, S. Zhao, et al., A review of model order reduction methods for large-scale structure systems, Shock Vib., 2021 (2021), 6631180. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6631180 doi: 10.1155/2021/6631180
    [4] O. M. Agudelo, C. Vermeersch, B. De Moor, Globally optimal ${H}_2$-norm model reduction: A numerical linear algebra approach, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54 (2021), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.117 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.117
    [5] S. Lagauw, O. M. Agudelo, B. De Moor, Globally optimal SISO ${H}_2$-norm model reduction using Walsh's theorem, IEEE Control Syst. Lett., 7 (2023), 1670–1675. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3276299 doi: 10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3276299
    [6] L. Yu, J. Xiong, ${H}_2$ model reduction for negative imaginary systems, Int. J. Control, 93 (2020), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1482501 doi: 10.1080/00207179.2018.1482501
    [7] Y. Sakai, T. Wada, Y. Fujisaki, Mixed ${H}_{2}/{H}_{\infty}$ balanced truncations for discrete time linear systems, in 2019 12th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), (2019), 301–306.
    [8] M. A. Hamadi, K. Jbilou, A. Ratnani, A data-driven Krylov model order reduction for large-scale dynamical systems, J. Sci. Comput., 95 (2023), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02122-8 doi: 10.1007/s10915-023-02122-8
    [9] A. Bunse-Gerstner, D. Kubalińska, G. Vossen, D. Wilczek, ${H}_2$-norm optimal model reduction for large scale discrete dynamical MIMO systems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233 (2010), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2008.12.029 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.12.029
    [10] M. Vidyasagar, The graph metric for unstable plants and robustness estimates for feedback stability, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 29 (1984), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1984.1103547 doi: 10.1109/TAC.1984.1103547
    [11] A. El-Sakkary, The gap metric: Robustness of stabilization of feedback systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 30 (1985), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1985.1103926 doi: 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103926
    [12] T. T. Georgiou, On the computation of the gap metric, Syst. Control Lett., 11 (1988), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(88)90067-9 doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(88)90067-9
    [13] J. H. Steele, G. Vinnicombe, Closed-loop time-domain model validation in the nu-gap metric, in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2001), 4332–4337. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2001.980882
    [14] S. Taamallah, Nu-gap metric a sum-of-squares and linear matrix inequality approach, in 2014 18th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), (2014), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC.2014.6982450
    [15] G. Buskes, M. Cantoni, Reduced order approximation in the $\nu$-gap metric, in 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2007), 4367–4372. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2007.4434557
    [16] M. Cantoni, On model reduction in the $\nu$-gap metric, in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2001), 3665–3670. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2001.980431
    [17] H. Kondo, Y. Ochi, I-PD flight controller design based on integral-type optimal servomechanism, J. Control Meas. Syst. Integr., 3 (2010), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.9746/jcmsi.3.448 doi: 10.9746/jcmsi.3.448
    [18] H. Kondo, Y. Ochi, Plant-model reduction for PID controller design, in 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2010), 6201–6206. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2010.5717005
    [19] A. Sootla, Nu-gap model reduction in the frequency domain, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 59 (2014), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2013.2290817 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2013.2290817
    [20] S. Taamallah, Model order reduction in the $\mathcal{L}_{2}$-gap metric, in 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), (2016), 2453–2459. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525285
    [21] Y. Hwang, Y. Ko, Y. Lee, T. Kim, Frequency-domain tuning of robust fixed-structure controllers via quantum-behaved particle swarm optimizer with cyclic neighborhood topology, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 16 (2018), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0766-3 doi: 10.1007/s12555-016-0766-3
    [22] S. M. Djouadi, On robustness in the gap metric and coprime factor uncertainty for LTV systems, Syst. Control Lett., 80 (2015), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2015.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2015.03.006
    [23] A. Mondal, S. Ganguli, P. Sarkar, Reduced order modeling of delta operator systems by optimal frequency fitting approach, IFAC J. Syst. Control, 27 (2024), 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacsc.2024.100240 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacsc.2024.100240
    [24] E. H. Houssein, M. K. Saeed, G. Hu, M. M. Al-Sayed, Metaheuristics for solving global and engineering optimization problems: Review, applications, open issues and challenges, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 31 (2024), 4485–4519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10168-6 doi: 10.1007/s11831-024-10168-6
    [25] D. Freitas, L. G. Lopes, F. Morgado-Dias, Particle swarm optimisation: A historical review up to the current developments, Entropy, 22 (2020), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22030362 doi: 10.3390/e22030362
    [26] G. Vinnicombe, Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 38 (1993), 1371–1383. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.237648 doi: 10.1109/9.237648
    [27] Y. Chahlaoui, P. Van Dooren, A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems, 2002. Available from: https://eprints.maths.manchester.ac.uk/1040/.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(306) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog