In this paper, our purpose is to discuss the global dynamics of a modified Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and prey-taxis under homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. First, we derive that the global classical solutions of the system are globally bounded by taking advantage of the Morse's iteration of the parabolic equation, which further arrives at the global existence of classical solutions with a uniform-in-time bound. In addition, we establish the global stability of the spatially homogeneous coexistence steady states under certain conditions on parameters by constructing Lyapunov functionals.
Citation: Jialu Tian, Ping Liu. Global dynamics of a modified Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and prey-taxis[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(3): 929-942. doi: 10.3934/era.2022048
[1] | Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444 |
[2] | Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15994-16016. doi: 10.3934/math.2022876 |
[3] | Kishor D. Kucche, Sagar T. Sutar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Analysis of nonlinear implicit fractional differential equations with the Atangana-Baleanu derivative via measure of non-compactness. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27058-27079. doi: 10.3934/math.20241316 |
[4] | Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Fatimah S. Bayones . On new computations of the fractional epidemic childhood disease model pertaining to the generalized fractional derivative with nonsingular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4552-4573. doi: 10.3934/math.2022254 |
[5] | Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046 |
[6] | Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736 |
[7] | Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241 |
[8] | Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aqeel Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Farman, Hadi Rezazadeh, Lanre Akinyemi, Muhammad Mannan Akram . Analysis of dengue transmission using fractional order scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8408-8429. doi: 10.3934/math.2022469 |
[9] | Veliappan Vijayaraj, Chokkalingam Ravichandran, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Kasthurisamy Jothimani . Existence and data dependence results for neutral fractional order integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1055-1071. doi: 10.3934/math.2023052 |
[10] | Eman A. A. Ziada, Salwa El-Morsy, Osama Moaaz, Sameh S. Askar, Ahmad M. Alshamrani, Monica Botros . Solution of the SIR epidemic model of arbitrary orders containing Caputo-Fabrizio, Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18324-18355. doi: 10.3934/math.2024894 |
In this paper, our purpose is to discuss the global dynamics of a modified Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and prey-taxis under homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. First, we derive that the global classical solutions of the system are globally bounded by taking advantage of the Morse's iteration of the parabolic equation, which further arrives at the global existence of classical solutions with a uniform-in-time bound. In addition, we establish the global stability of the spatially homogeneous coexistence steady states under certain conditions on parameters by constructing Lyapunov functionals.
The Hermite-Hadamard inequality, which is one of the basic inequalities of inequality theory, has many applications in statistics and optimization theory, as well as providing estimates about the mean value of convex functions.
Assume that f:I⊆R→R is a convex mapping defined on the interval I of R where a<b. The following statement;
f(a+b2)≤1b−ab∫af(x)dx≤f(a)+f(b)2 |
holds and known as Hermite-Hadamard inequality. Both inequalities hold in the reversed direction if f is concave.
The concept of convex function, which is used in many classical and analytical inequalities, especially the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, has attracted the attention of many researchers see [4,7,8,9], and has expanded its application area with the construction of new convex function classes. The introduction of this useful class of functions for functions of two variables gave a new direction to convex analysis. In this sense, in [6], Dragomir mentioned about an expansion of the concept of convex function, which is used in many inequalities in theory and has applications in different fields of applied sciences and convex programming.
Definition 1.1. Let us consider the bidimensional interval Δ=[a,b]×[c,d] in R2 with a<b,c<d. A function f:Δ→R will be called convex on the co-ordinates if the partial mappings fy:[a,b]→R,fy(u)=f(u,y) and fx:[c,d]→R,fx(v)=f(x,v) are convex where defined for all y∈[c,d] and x∈[a,b]. Recall that the mapping f:Δ→R is convex on Δ if the following inequality holds,
f(λx+(1−λ)z,λy+(1−λ)w)≤λf(x,y)+(1−λ)f(z,w) |
for all (x,y),(z,w)∈Δ and λ∈[0,1].
Transferring the concept of convex function to coordinates inspired the presentation of Hermite-Hadamard inequality in coordinates and Dragomir proved this inequality as follows.
Theorem 1.1. (See [6]) Suppose that f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]→R is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ. Then one has the inequalities;
f(a+b2,c+d2)≤12[1b−a∫baf(x,c+d2)dx+1d−c∫dcf(a+b2,y)dy]≤1(b−a)(d−c)∫ba∫dcf(x,y)dxdy≤14[1(b−a)∫baf(x,c)dx+1(b−a)∫baf(x,d)dx+1(d−c)∫dcf(a,y)dy+1(d−c)∫dcf(b,y)dy]≤f(a,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,c)+f(b,d)4. | (1.1) |
The above inequalities are sharp.
To provide further information about convexity and inequalities that have been established on the coordinates, see the papers [1,2,5,10,11,12,13,14,15]).
One of the trending problems of recent times is to present different types of convex functions and to derive new inequalities for these function classes. Now we will continue by remembering the concept of n-polynomial convex function.
Definition 1.2. (See [16]) Let n∈N. A non-negative function f:I⊂R→R is called n-polynomial convex function if for every x,y∈I and t∈[0,1],
f(tx+(1−t)y)≤1nn∑s=1(1−(1−t)s)f(x)+1nn∑s=1(1−ts)f(y). |
We will denote by POLC(I) the class of all n-polynomial convex functions on interval I.
In the same paper, the authors have proved some new Hadamard type inequalities, we will mention the following one:
Theorem 1.2. (See [16]) Let f:[a,b]→R be an n-polynomial convex function. If a<b and f∈L[a,b], then the following Hermite-Hadaamrd type inequalities hold:
12(nn+2−n−1)f(a+b2)≤1b−ab∫af(x)dx≤f(a)+f(b)nn∑s=1ss+1. | (1.2) |
Since some of the convex function classes can be described on the basis of means, averages have an important place in convex function theory. In [3], Awan et al. gave the harmonic version on the n-polynomial convexity described on the basis of the arithmetic mean as follows. They have also proved several new integral inequalities of Hadamard type.
Definition 1.3. (See [3]) Let n∈N and H⊆(0,∞) be an interval. Then a nonnegative real-valued function f:H→[0,∞) is said to be an n-polynomial harmonically convex function if
f(xytx+(1−t)y)≤1nn∑s=1(1−(1−t)s)f(y)+1nn∑s=1(1−ts)f(x) |
for all x,y∈H and t∈[0,1].
Theorem 1.3. (See [3]) Let f:[a,b]⊆(0,∞)→[0,∞) be an n-polynomial harmonically convex function. Then one has
12(nn+2−n−1)f(2aba+b)≤abb−ab∫af(x)x2dx≤f(a)+f(b)nn∑s=1ss+1 | (1.3) |
if f∈L[a,b].
The main motivation in this study is to give a new modification of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on the coordinates and to obtain Hadamard type inequalities via double integrals and by using Hö lder inequality along with a few properties of this new class of functions.
In this section, we will give a new classes of convexity that will be called (m,n)-polynomial convex function as following.
Definition 2.1. Let m,n∈N and Δ=[a,b]×[c,d] be a bidimensional interval. Then a non-negative real-valued function f:Δ→R is said to be (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ on the co-ordinates if the following inequality holds:
f(xztz+(1−t)x,ywsw+(1−s)y)≤1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)f(x,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)f(x,w)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)f(z,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)f(z,w) |
where (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)∈Δ and t,s∈[0,1].
Remark 2.1. If one choose m=n=1, it is easy to see that the definition of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions reduces to the class of the harmonically convex functions.
Remark 2.2. The (2,2)-harmonically polynomial convex functions satisfy the following inequality;
f(xztx+(1−t)z,ywsz+(1−s)w)≤3t−t223s−s22f(x,y)+3t−t222−s−s22f(x,w)+2−t−t223s−s22f(z,y)+2−t−t222−s−s22f(z,w) |
where (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)∈Δ and t,s∈[0,1].
Theorem 2.1. Assume that b>a>0,d>c>0,fα:[a,b]×[c,d]→[0,∞) be a family of the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on Δ and f(u,v)=supfα(u,v). Then, f is (m,n)- harmonically polynomial convex function on the coordinates if K={x,y∈[a,b]×[c,d]:f(x,y)<∞} is an interval.
Proof. For t,s∈[0,1] and (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)∈Δ, we can write
f(xztz+(1−t)x,ywsw+(1−s)y)=supfα(xztz+(1−t)x,ywsw+(1−s)y)≤1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)supfα(x,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)supfα(x,w)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)supfα(z,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)supfα(z,w)=1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)f(x,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)f(x,w)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)f(z,y)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)f(z,w) |
which completes the proof.
Lemma 2.1. Every (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates.
Proof. Consider the function f:Δ→R is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ. Then, the partial mapping fx:[c,d]→R,fx(v)=f(x,v) is valid. We can write
fx(vwtw+(1−t)v)=f(x,vwtw+(1−t)v)=f(x2tx+(1−t)x,vwtw+(1−t)v)≤1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)f(x,v)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)f(x,w)=1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)fx(v)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)fx(w) |
for all t∈[0,1] and v,w∈[c,d]. This shows the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convexity of fx. By a similar argument, one can see the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convexity of fy.
Remark 2.3. Every (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates may not be (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ.
A simple verification of the remark can be seen in the following example.
Example 2.1. Let us consider f:[1,3]×[2,3]→[0,∞), given by f(x,y)=(x−1)(y−2). It is clear that f is harmonically polynomial convex on the coordinates but is not harmonically polynomial convex on [1,3]×[2,3], because if we choose (1,3),(2,3)∈[1,3]×[2,3] and t∈[0,1], we have
RHSf(22t+(1−t),93t+3(1−t))=f(21−t,3)=1+t1−tLHS1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)f(1,3)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)f(2,3)=0. |
Then, it is easy to see that
f(22t+(1−t),93t+3(1−t))>1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)f(1,3)+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)f(2,3). |
This shows that f is not harmonically polynomial convex on [1,3]×[2,3].
Now, we will establish associated Hadamard inequality for (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on the co-ordinates.
Theorem 2.2. Suppose that f:Δ→R is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex on the coordinates on Δ. Then, the following inequalities hold:
14(mm+2−m−1)(nn+2−n−1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)≤14[(mm+2−m−1)abb−a∫baf(x,2cdc+d)x2dx+(nn+2−n−1)cdd−c∫dcf(2aba+b,y)y2dy]≤abcd(b−a)(d−c)∫ba∫dcf(x,y)x2y2dxdy≤12[1n(cd(d−c)∫dcf(a,y)y2dy+cd(d−c)∫dcf(b,y)y2dy)n∑s=1ss+1+1m(ab(b−a)∫baf(x,c)x2dx+ab(b−a)∫baf(x,d)x2dx)m∑t=1tt+1]≤(f(a,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,c)+f(b,d)nm)(n∑s=1ss+1m∑t=1tt+1). | (2.1) |
Proof. Since f is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates, it follows that the mapping hx and hy are (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions. Therefore, by using the inequality (1.3) for the partial mappings, we can write
12(mm+2−m−1)hx(2cdc+d)≤cdd−cd∫chx(y)y2dy≤hx(c)+hx(d)mm∑s=1ss+1 | (2.2) |
namely
12(mm+2−m−1)f(x,2cdc+d)≤cdd−cd∫cf(x,y)y2dy≤f(x,c)+f(x,d)mn∑s=1ss+1. | (2.3) |
Dividing both sides of (2.2) by (b−a)ab and by integrating the resulting inequality over [a,b], we have
ab2(b−a)(mm+2−m−1)b∫af(x,2cdc+d)dx≤abcd(b−a)(d−c)b∫ad∫cf(x,y)x2y2dydx≤abb∫af(x,c)x2dx+abb∫af(x,d)x2dxm(b−a)m∑s=1ss+1. | (2.4) |
By a similar argument for (2.3), but now for dividing both sides by (d−c)cd and integrating over [c,d] and by using the mapping hy is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function, we get
cd2(d−c)(nn+2−n−1)d∫cf(2aba+b,y)y2dy≤abcd(b−a)(d−c)b∫ad∫cf(x,y)x2y2dydx≤cdd∫cf(a,y)y2dy+cdd∫cf(b,y)y2dyn(d−c)n∑t=1tt+1. | (2.5) |
By summing the inequalities (2.4) and (2.5) side by side, we obtain the second and third inequalities of (2.1). By the inequality (1.3), we also have:
12(mm+2−m−1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)≤cdd−cd∫cf(2aba+b,y)y2dy |
and
12(nn+2−n−1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)≤abb−ab∫af(x,2cdc+d)x2dx |
which give by addition the first inequality of (2.1). Finally, by using the inequality (1.3), we obtain
cdd−cd∫cf(a,y)y2dy≤f(a,c)+f(a,d)mn∑s=1ss+1, |
cdd−cd∫cf(b,y)y2dy≤f(b,c)+f(b,d)mn∑s=1ss+1, |
abb−ab∫af(x,c)x2dx≤f(a,c)+f(b,c)nn∑t=1tt+1, |
and
abb−ab∫af(x,d)x2dx≤f(a,d)+f(b,d)nn∑t=1tt+1 |
which give by addition the last inequality of (2.1).
In order to prove our main findings, we need the following identity.
Lemma 2.2. Assume that f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]⊂(0,∞)×(0,∞)→R be a partial differentiable mapping on Δ and ∂2f∂t∂s∈L(Δ). Then, one has the following equality:
Φ(f)=f(a,c)+f(b,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,d)4+abcd(b−a)(d−c)∫ba∫dcf(x,y)x2y2dxdy−12[cdd−c∫dcf(a,y)y2dy+cdd−c∫dcf(b,y)y2dy+abb−a∫baf(x,c)x2dx+abb−a∫baf(x,d)x2dx]=abcd(b−a)(d−c)4×∫10∫10(1−2t)(1−2s)(AtBs)2∂2f∂t∂s(abAt,cdBs)dsdt |
where At=tb+(1−t)a,Bs=sd+(1−s)c.
Theorem 2.3. Let f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]⊂(0,∞)×(0,∞)→R be a partial differentiable mapping on Δ and ∂2f∂t∂s∈L(Δ). If |∂2f∂t∂s|q is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ, then one has the following inequality:
|Φ(f)|≤bd(b−a)(d−c)4ac(p+1)2p×[c1|∂2f∂t∂s(a,c)|q+c2|∂2f∂t∂s(a,d)|q+c3|∂2f∂t∂s(b,c)|q+c4|∂2f∂t∂s(b,d)|q]1q | (2.6) |
where
c1=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c2=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c3=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c4=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
and At=tb+(1−t)a,Bs=sd+(1−s)c for fixed t,s∈[0,1],p,q>1 and p−1+q−1=1.
Proof. By using the identity that is given in Lemma 2.2, we can write
|Φ(f)|=abcd(b−a)(d−c)4∫10∫10|(1−2t)||(1−2s)|(AtBs)2|∂2f∂t∂s(abAt,cdBs)|dsdt |
By using the well known Hölder inequality for double integrals and by taking into account the definition of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions, we get
|Φ(f)|≤abcd(b−a)(d−c)4(∫10∫10|1−2t|p|1−2s|pdtds)1p×(∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q|∂2f∂t∂s(abAt,cdBs)|qdtds)1q≤abcd(b−a)(d−c)4(∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q×(1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)|∂2f∂t∂s(a,c)|q+1nn∑i=1(1−(1−t)i)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)|∂2f∂t∂s(a,d)|q+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−(1−s)j)|∂2f∂t∂s(b,c)|q+1nn∑i=1(1−ti)1mm∑j=1(1−sj)|∂2f∂t∂s(b,d)|q)dtds)1q |
By computing the above integrals, we can easily see the followings
∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q(1−(1−t)i)(1−(1−s)j)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q(1−(1−t)i)(1−sj)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q(1−ti)(1−(1−s)j)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
and
∫10∫10(AtBs)−2q(1−ti)(1−sj)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)] |
where 2F1 is Hypergeometric function defined by
2F1(2q,1;2;1−ba)=1B(b,c−b)1∫0tb−1(1−t)c−b−1(1−zt)−adt, |
for c>b>0,|z|<1 and Beta function is defind as B(x,y)=1∫0tx−1(1−t)y−1dt,x,y>0. This completes the proof.
Corollary 2.1. If we set m=n=1 in (2.6), we have the following new inequality.
|Φ(f)|≤bd(b−a)(d−c)4ac(p+1)2p×[c11|∂2f∂t∂s(a,c)|q+c22|∂2f∂t∂s(a,d)|q+c33|∂2f∂t∂s(b,c)|q+c44|∂2f∂t∂s(b,d)|q]1q |
where
c11=[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c22=[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c33=[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c44=[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
Corollary 2.2. Suppose that all the conditions of Theorem 2.3 hold. If we set |∂2f(t,s)∂t∂s|q is bounded, i.e.,
‖∂2f(t,s)∂t∂s‖∞=sup(t,s)∈(a,b)×(c,d)|∂2f(t,s)∂t∂s|q<∞, |
we get
|Φ(f)|≤bd(b−a)(d−c)4ac(p+1)2p‖∂2f(t,s)∂t∂s‖∞×[c1+c2+c3+c4]1q |
where c1,c2,c3,c4 as in Theorem 2.3.
c1=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c2=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c3=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1−cd)], |
c4=1nn∑i=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−ab)−1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1−ab)]×1mm∑j=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1−cd)−1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1−cd)], |
N. Mlaiki and T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM) group number RG-DES-2017-01-17.
S. Butt would like to thank H. E. C. Pakistan (project 7906) for their support.
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
V. Volterra, Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi, Mem. Acad. Lincei Roma., 2 (1926), 31–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/118558a0 doi: 10.1038/118558a0
![]() |
[2] |
M. Liu, K. Wang, Dynamics of a Leslie-Gower Holling-type Ⅱ predator-prey system with Lévy jumps, Nonlinear Anal., 85 (2013), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2013.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2013.02.018
![]() |
[3] |
J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Anim. Ecol., (1975), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866 doi: 10.2307/3866
![]() |
[4] |
D. DeAngelis, R. A. Goldstein, R. V. Oneill, A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, (1975), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936298 doi: 10.2307/1936298
![]() |
[5] |
M. Haque, A detailed study of the Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model, Math. Biosci., 234 (2011), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.003
![]() |
[6] |
Q. Wang, L. Jin, Z. Y. Zhang, Global well-posedness, pattern formation and spiky stationary solutions in a Beddington-DeAngelis competition system, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 40 (2020), 2105–2134. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020108 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020108
![]() |
[7] |
J. P. Wang, M. X. Wang, The diffusive Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model with nonlinear prey-taxis and free boundary, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 41 (2018), 6741–6762. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5189 doi: 10.1002/mma.5189
![]() |
[8] |
S. B. Yu, Global stability of a modified Leslie-Gower model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Adv. Differ. Equ., 84 (2014), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-84 doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2014-84
![]() |
[9] |
P. Liu, B. W. Yang, Dynamics analysis of a reaction-diffusion system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and strong Allee effect, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 5 (2020), 102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2019.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2019.06.003
![]() |
[10] |
H. Hattori, A. Lagha, Global existence and decay rates of the solutions for a chemotaxis system with Lotka-Volterra type model for chemoattractant and repellent, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021), 5141–516. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2021071 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021071
![]() |
[11] |
W. K. Wang, Y. C. Wang, Global existence and large time behavior for the chemotaxis-shallow water system in a bounded domain, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 40 (2020), 6379–6409. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020284 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020284
![]() |
[12] |
S. N. Wu, J. P. Shi, B. Y. Wu, Global existence of solutions and uniform persistence of a diffusive predator-prey model with prey-taxis, J. Differ. Equ., 269 (2016), 5847–5874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.12.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.12.024
![]() |
[13] |
H. Y. Jin, Z. A. Wang, Global stability of prey-taxis systems. J. Differ. Equ., 262 (2017), 1257–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.10.010
![]() |
[14] | J. P. Wang, M. X. Wang, Boundedness and global stability of the two-predator and one-prey models with nonlinear prey-taxis, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 69 (2018), Paper No. 63, 24 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-018-0960-7 |
[15] |
S. N. Wu, W. J. Ni, Boundedness and global stability of a diffusive prey-predator model with prey-taxis, Appl. Anal., 100 (2021), 3259–3275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2020.1715953 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2020.1715953
![]() |
[16] |
S. N. Wu, J. F. Wang, J. P. Shi, Dynamics and pattern formation of a diffusive predator-prey model with predator-taxis, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 28 (2018), 2275–2312. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202518400158 doi: 10.1142/S0218202518400158
![]() |
[17] |
J. F. Wang, S. N. Wu, J. P. Shi, Pattern formation in diffusive predator-prey systems with predator-taxis and prey-taxis, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 26 (2021), 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020162 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020162
![]() |
[18] |
X. L. Wang, W. D. Wang, G. H. Zhang, Global bifurcation of solutions for a predator-prey model with prey-taxis, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 38 (2015), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3079 doi: 10.1002/mma.3079
![]() |
[19] |
C. W. Yoon, Y. J. Kim, Global existence and aggregation in a Keller-Segel model with Fokker-Planck diffusion, Acta Appl. Math., 149 (2017), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-016-0089-7 doi: 10.1007/s10440-016-0089-7
![]() |
[20] | H. Amann, Nonhomogeneous linear and quasilinear elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems, in: Function Spaces, Differential Operators and Nonlinear Analysis, Friedrichroda, 1992, in: Teubner-Texte Math., vol. 133, Teubner, Stuttgart, 1993, 9–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11336-21 |
[21] |
H. Y. Jin, Z. A. Wang, Global dynamics and spatio-temporal patterns of predator-prey systems with density-dependent motion, Euro. J. Appl. Math., 32 (2021), 652–682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792520000248 doi: 10.1017/S0956792520000248
![]() |
[22] |
N. D. Alikakos, Lp bounds of solutions of reaction-diffusion equations, Commun. Partial. Differ. Equ., 4 (1979), 827–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605307908820113 doi: 10.1080/03605307908820113
![]() |
[23] |
N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid, Y. S. Tao, M. Winkler, Towards a mathematical theory of Keller-Segel models of pattern formation in biological tissues, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 25 (2015), 1663–1763. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251550044X doi: 10.1142/S021820251550044X
![]() |
[24] |
N. Bellomo, Y. S. Tao, Stabilization in a chemotaxis model for virus infection, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13 (2020), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020006 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020006
![]() |
[25] |
H. Y. Jin, Y. J. Kim, Z. A. Wang, Boundedness, stabilization and pattern formation driven by density-suppressed motility, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 78 (2018), 1632–1657. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1144647 doi: 10.1137/17M1144647
![]() |
1. | Hua Mei, Aying Wan, Bai-Ni Guo, Basil Papadopoulos, Coordinated MT- s 1 , s 2 -Convex Functions and Their Integral Inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard Type, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/5586377 | |
2. | Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Nadeem, Maria Alessandra Ragusa, Some new integral inequalities for a general variant of polynomial convex functions, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 20461, 10.3934/math.20221121 | |
3. | Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Saowaluck Chasreechai, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for convex stochastic processes, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 11989, 10.3934/math.2021695 | |
4. | Suphawat Asawasamrit, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard and quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense with applications, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 13327, 10.3934/math.2021771 | |
5. | Artion Kashuri, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Muhammad Tariq, Ahmed A. Hamoud, Homan Emadifar, Faraidun K. Hamasalh, Nedal M. Mohammed, Masoumeh Khademi, Guotao Wang, Integral Inequalities of Integer and Fractional Orders for n –Polynomial Harmonically t g s –Convex Functions and Their Applications, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/2493944 | |
6. | Farhat Safdar, Muhammad Attique, Some new generalizations for exponentially (s, m)-preinvex functions considering generalized fractional integral operators, 2021, 1016-2526, 861, 10.52280/pujm.2021.531203 | |
7. | Ying-Qing Song, Saad Ihsan Butt, Artion Kashuri, Jamshed Nasir, Muhammad Nadeem, New fractional integral inequalities pertaining 2D–approximately coordinate (r1,ℏ1)-(r2,ℏ2)–convex functions, 2022, 61, 11100168, 563, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.044 | |
8. | Waqar Afzal, Sayed M. Eldin, Waqas Nazeer, Ahmed M. Galal, Some integral inequalities for harmonical cr-h-Godunova-Levin stochastic processes, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 13473, 10.3934/math.2023683 | |
9. | Serap Özcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponential type multiplicatively convex functions, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 9777, 10.2298/FIL2328777O | |
10. | Serap Özcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicatively p-convex functions, 2023, 2023, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-023-03032-x | |
11. | Serap Özcan, Saad Ihsan Butt, Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicatively harmonic convex functions, 2023, 2023, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-023-03020-1 | |
12. | Serap Özcan, Simpson, midpoint, and trapezoid-type inequalities for multiplicatively s-convex functions, 2025, 58, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2024-0060 | |
13. | Serap Özcan, Ayça Uruş, Saad Ihsan Butt, Hermite–Hadamard-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Harmonic s-Convex Functions, 2025, 76, 0041-5995, 1537, 10.1007/s11253-025-02404-4 |