Research article

QSAR study and theoretical investigation on the lethality of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons toward Aspergillus (A.) Nidulans

  • Received: 20 August 2024 Revised: 06 January 2025 Accepted: 08 May 2025 Published: 19 May 2025
  • The prediction of Aspergillus (A.) nidulans toxicities (log1/D37) for a set of 55 halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) was thoroughly investigated using density functional theory (DFT) computations. Different multiple linear regression (MLR)methods were employed to assess the reliability of the proposed quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) model. The obtained ELUMO, Egap, molecular polarizability (α), and molar refractivity (MR) values offered informative indications in determining the toxicity of the HAHs. A promising three-descriptor linear model was constructed using 41 molecules as a training set; then, the model was validated on the remaining 14 molecules. Statistical comparisons between these models and others quoted from the literature were presented. Furthermore, the potential causes of the outlier molecules in the proposed QSAR models were explored. The most preferable interactions were obviously noticed within the 1-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complex, followed by 2-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan and 2-chloro-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complexes. Compared to other analogs, the higher number of bond paths and bond critical points within the 1-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complex highlighted its high preferability.

    Citation: Jabir H. Al-Fahemi, Faten A. Aljiffrey, Elshafie A. M. Gad, Mahmoud A. A. Ibrahim. QSAR study and theoretical investigation on the lethality of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons toward Aspergillus (A.) Nidulans[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(3): 419-434. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025019

    Related Papers:

  • The prediction of Aspergillus (A.) nidulans toxicities (log1/D37) for a set of 55 halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) was thoroughly investigated using density functional theory (DFT) computations. Different multiple linear regression (MLR)methods were employed to assess the reliability of the proposed quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) model. The obtained ELUMO, Egap, molecular polarizability (α), and molar refractivity (MR) values offered informative indications in determining the toxicity of the HAHs. A promising three-descriptor linear model was constructed using 41 molecules as a training set; then, the model was validated on the remaining 14 molecules. Statistical comparisons between these models and others quoted from the literature were presented. Furthermore, the potential causes of the outlier molecules in the proposed QSAR models were explored. The most preferable interactions were obviously noticed within the 1-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complex, followed by 2-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan and 2-chloro-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complexes. Compared to other analogs, the higher number of bond paths and bond critical points within the 1-bromo-2-methylpropane…α-glucan complex highlighted its high preferability.



    加载中


    [1] Premkumar R, Hussain S, Koyambo-Konzapa SJ, et al. (2021) SERS and DFT studies of 2-(trichloroacetyl)pyrrole chemisorbed on the surface of silver and gold coated thin films: In perspective of biosensor applications. J Mol Recognit 34: e2921. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.2921 doi: 10.1002/jmr.2921
    [2] MacFarland HN (1986) Toxicology of solvents. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 47: 704–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668691390511 doi: 10.1080/15298668691390511
    [3] Crebelli R, Andreoli C, Carere A, et al. (1995) Toxicology of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons: structural and molecular determinants for the disturbance of chromosome segregation and the induction of lipid peroxidation. Chem-Biol Interact 98: 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2797(95)03639-3 doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(95)03639-3
    [4] Trohalaki S, Gifford E, Pachter R (2000) Improved QSARs for predictive toxicology of halogenated hydrocarbons. Comput Chem 24: 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0097-8485(99)00093-5 doi: 10.1016/s0097-8485(99)00093-5
    [5] Gadaleta D, Vukovic K, Toma C, et al. (2019) SAR and QSAR modeling of a large collection of LD(50) rat acute oral toxicity data. J Cheminformatics 11: 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0383-2 doi: 10.1186/s13321-019-0383-2
    [6] Li F, Wang P, Fan T, et al. (2024) Prioritization of the ecotoxicological hazard of PAHs towards aquatic species spanning three trophic levels using 2D-QSTR, read-across and machine learning-driven modelling approaches. J Hazard Mater 465: 133410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133410 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133410
    [7] Wang QQ, Fan TJ, Jia RQ, et al. (2024) First report on the QSAR modelling and multistep virtual screening of the inhibitors of nonstructural protein Nsp14 of SARS-CoV-2: Reducing unnecessary chemical synthesis and experimental tests. Arab J Chem 17: 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105614 doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105614
    [8] Oubahmane M, Hdoufane I, Delaite C, et al. (2023) Design of Potent Inhibitors Targeting the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 Using QSAR Modeling, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Pharmaceuticals.
    [9] Dearden JC, Cronin MT, Dobbs AJ (1995) Quantitative structure-activity relationships as a tool to assess the comparative toxicity of organic chemicals. Chemosphere 31: 2521–2528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(95)00121-n doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00121-n
    [10] Cronin MT, Dearden JC, Duffy JC, et al. (2002) The importance of hydrophobicity and electrophilicity descriptors in mechanistically-based QSARs for toxicological endpoints. SAR QSAR Environ Res 13: 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360290002316 doi: 10.1080/10629360290002316
    [11] Martin TM, Harten P, Young DM, et al. (2012) Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling? J Chem Inf Model 52: 2570–2578. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci300338w doi: 10.1021/ci300338w
    [12] te Velde G, Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJ, et al. (2001) Chemistry with ADF. J Comput Chem 22: 931–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.1056 doi: 10.1002/jcc.1056
    [13] Fonseca Guerra C, Snijders JG, te Velde G, et al. (1998) Towards an order- N DFT method. Theor Chem Acc 99: 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002140050353 doi: 10.1007/s002140050353
    [14] Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys Rev B 45: 13244–13249. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.45.13244 doi: 10.1103/physrevb.45.13244
    [15] Perdew JP, Chevary JA, Vosko SH, et al. (1992) Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys Rev B 46: 6671–6687. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.46.6671 doi: 10.1103/physrevb.46.6671
    [16] Bodor N, Gabanyi Z, Wong CK (1989) A New Method for the Estimation of Partition-Coefficient. J Am Chem Soc 111: 3783–3786. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00193a003 doi: 10.1021/ja00193a003
    [17] Elmi Z, Faez K, Goodarzi M, et al. (2009) Feature selection method based on fuzzy entropy for regression in QSAR studies. Mol Phys 107: 1787–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970903078559 doi: 10.1080/00268970903078559
    [18] Goudarzi N, Goodarzi M, Chen T (2012) QSAR prediction of HIV inhibition activity of styrylquinoline derivatives by genetic algorithm coupled with multiple linear regressions. Med Chem Res 21: 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-010-9542-8 doi: 10.1007/s00044-010-9542-8
    [19] Cai Z, Zafferani M, Akande OM, et al. (2022) Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Study Predicts Small-Molecule Binding to RNA Structure. J Med Chem 65: 7262–7277. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00254 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00254
    [20] Nie NH, Bent DH, Hull CH (1970) SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences: McGraw-Hill.
    [21] Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Exploring the limit of accuracy of the global hybrid meta density functional for main-group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 4: 1849–1868. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct800246v doi: 10.1021/ct800246v
    [22] Ibrahim MAA (2012) Molecular mechanical perspective on halogen bonding. J Mol Model 18: 4625–4638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1454-8 doi: 10.1007/s00894-012-1454-8
    [23] Boys SF, Bernardi F (2006) The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol Phys 19: 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977000101561
    [24] Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. (2009) Gaussian 09. Revision E01 ed. Wallingford CT, USA.: Gaussian09, Gaussian Inc.
    [25] Lu T, Chen F (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33: 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885 doi: 10.1002/jcc.22885
    [26] Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
    [27] Al-Fahemi JH (2012) The use of quantum-chemical descriptors for predicting the photoinduced toxicity of PAHs. J Mol Model 18: 4121–4129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1417-0 doi: 10.1007/s00894-012-1417-0
    [28] Al-Fahemi JH (2013) Structural descriptors for the correlation of human blood: air partition coefficient of volatile organic molecules by QSPRs. Struct Chem 24: 2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-013-0224-2 doi: 10.1007/s11224-013-0224-2
    [29] Kim KH (2021) Outliers in SAR and QSAR: 3. Importance of considering the role of water molecules in protein-ligand interactions and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. J Comput-Aid Mol Des 35: 371-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-021-00377-7
    [30] Zhao L, Wang W, Sedykh A, et al. (2017) Experimental Errors in QSAR Modeling Sets: What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do. ACS Omega 2: 2805–2812. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00274 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00274
    [31] Kim KH (2007) Outliers in SAR and QSAR: 2. Is a flexible binding site a possible source of outliers? J Comput-Aid Mol Des 21: 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-007-9126-y
    [32] Kim KH (2007) Outliers in SAR and QSAR: is unusual binding mode a possible source of outliers? J Comput-Aid Mol Des 21: 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-007-9106-2 doi: 10.1007/s10822-007-9106-2
    [33] Kim KH (2022) Outliers in SAR and QSAR: 4. effects of allosteric protein-ligand interactions on the classical quantitative structure-activity relationships. Mol Divers 26: 3057–3092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-021-10365-6
    [34] Alam MK, van Straaten KE, Sanders DA, et al. (2014) Aspergillus nidulans cell wall composition and function change in response to hosting several Aspergillus fumigatus UDP-galactopyranose mutase activity mutants. PLoS One 9: e85735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085735 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085735
    [35] Gastebois A, Clavaud C, Aimanianda V, et al. (2009) Aspergillus fumigatus: cell wall polysaccharides, their biosynthesis and organization. Future Microbiol 4: 583–595. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.09.29 doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.29
    [36] de Groot PW, Brandt BW, Horiuchi H, et al. (2009) Comprehensive genomic analysis of cell wall genes in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol 46 Suppl 1: S72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2008.07.022 doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.07.022
    [37] Guest GM, Momany M (2000) Analysis of cell wall sugars in the pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus and the saprophyte Aspergillus nidulans. Mycologia 92: 1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761470 doi: 10.2307/3761470
    [38] Free SJ (2013) Chapter Two - Fungal Cell Wall Organization and Biosynthesis. In: Friedmann T, Dunlap JC, Goodwin SF, editors. Advances in Genetics: Academic Press. pp. 33–82.
  • Environ-12-03-019-s001.pdf
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1290) PDF downloads(172) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog