Spark-ignition engines remain widely used in passenger cars, motorcycles, hybrid vehicles, and light-duty transport, making fuel flexibility and emission reduction important during the transition to low-carbon mobility. Methanol-gasoline blends have attracted attention as alternative fuels because methanol has high oxygen content, high octane quality, strong charge-cooling capacity, and flexible production routes.
This review summarizes recent progress in methanol-gasoline blends for spark-ignition engines, covering fuel properties, blending ratios, combustion behavior, engine performance, regulated and unregulated emissions, life-cycle impacts, and application prospects. The literature shows that methanol addition can enhance knock resistance, promote oxygenated combustion, reduce soot-forming tendency, and support higher compression ratios, optimized ignition timing, and lean-burn operation. However, its lower energy density increases fuel consumption, while water affinity, phase separation, cold-start difficulty, corrosion, and material compatibility remain key barriers. Emission responses are strongly condition-dependent. CO and particulate emissions are often reduced, whereas HC and NOx vary with operating condition, mixture preparation, injection strategy, and after-treatment performance. Formaldehyde, unburned methanol, and cold-start oxygenated emissions require further attention. Life-cycle benefits depend mainly on methanol production pathways. Low-level blends are more suitable for near-term use in existing engines, while higher blends require optimized engines, compatible fuel systems, green methanol supply, infrastructure readiness, and cost reduction.
Citation: Zewei Hao, Danfeng Du, Xiangnan Bu, Zexin Liu, Chaowei Sun, Xiurong Guo. Methanol-gasoline blends in spark-ignition engines: A review of research progress and application prospects[J]. AIMS Energy, 2026, 14(4): 834-873. doi: 10.3934/energy.2026034
Spark-ignition engines remain widely used in passenger cars, motorcycles, hybrid vehicles, and light-duty transport, making fuel flexibility and emission reduction important during the transition to low-carbon mobility. Methanol-gasoline blends have attracted attention as alternative fuels because methanol has high oxygen content, high octane quality, strong charge-cooling capacity, and flexible production routes.
This review summarizes recent progress in methanol-gasoline blends for spark-ignition engines, covering fuel properties, blending ratios, combustion behavior, engine performance, regulated and unregulated emissions, life-cycle impacts, and application prospects. The literature shows that methanol addition can enhance knock resistance, promote oxygenated combustion, reduce soot-forming tendency, and support higher compression ratios, optimized ignition timing, and lean-burn operation. However, its lower energy density increases fuel consumption, while water affinity, phase separation, cold-start difficulty, corrosion, and material compatibility remain key barriers. Emission responses are strongly condition-dependent. CO and particulate emissions are often reduced, whereas HC and NOx vary with operating condition, mixture preparation, injection strategy, and after-treatment performance. Formaldehyde, unburned methanol, and cold-start oxygenated emissions require further attention. Life-cycle benefits depend mainly on methanol production pathways. Low-level blends are more suitable for near-term use in existing engines, while higher blends require optimized engines, compatible fuel systems, green methanol supply, infrastructure readiness, and cost reduction.
| [1] |
Srikrishnan G, Shenbagamuthuraman V, Agbulut Ü, et al. (2024) Alcohol fuels in SI engines: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review on combustion, performance, and environmental impacts. J Therm Anal Calorim 149: 12141–12203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13544-3 doi: 10.1007/s10973-024-13544-3
|
| [2] |
Verhelst S, Turner JWG, Sileghem L, et al. (2019) Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 70: 43–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2018.10.001
|
| [3] |
Agarwal AK, Kumar V, Singh AP (2026) Challenges and prospects of primary alcohols as global transport fuels. Fuel 414: 138177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.138177 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.138177
|
| [4] |
Wouters C, Burkardt P, Steeger F, et al. (2023) Comprehensive assessment of methanol as an alternative fuel for spark-ignition engines. Fuel 340: 127627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127627 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127627
|
| [5] |
Wang CM, Li YF, Xu CS, et al. (2019) Methanol as an octane booster for gasoline fuels. Fuel 248: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.128 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.128
|
| [6] |
Ho CS, Peng JF, Yun U, et al. (2022) Impacts of methanol fuel on vehicular emissions: A review. Front Environ Sci Eng 16: 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1553-4 doi: 10.1007/s11783-022-1553-4
|
| [7] |
Yu H, Su Y, Shen B, et al. (2024) Effect of direct methanol injection based on low-flow injector on knock of gasoline engine under heavy load condition. Fuel 357: 129899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129899 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129899
|
| [8] |
Kassem MGA, Ahmed AMM, Abdel-Rahman HH, et al. (2019) Use of Span 80 and Tween 80 for blending gasoline and alcohol in spark ignition engines. Energy Rep 5: 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.01.009
|
| [9] |
Shirazi SA, Abdollahipoor B, Martinson J, et al. (2019) Effects of dual-alcohol gasoline blends on physiochemical properties and volatility behavior. Fuel 252: 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.105 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.105
|
| [10] |
Liu RB, Cui Q, Li HY, et al. (2025) Evaluating the influence of the compression ratio on the combustion process using methanol, gasoline, and methanol-gasoline blends. Energy Rep 14: 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.08.003
|
| [11] |
Boggavarapu P, Ashwin BM, Athreya VA, et al. (2025) Performance and emission characteristics of methanol and methanol-blended gasoline fuels in a high compression ratio SI engine. Appl Therm Eng 281: 128703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128703 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128703
|
| [12] |
Esposito S, Malfi E, De Felice M, et al. (2025) Methanol fuelling of a spark-ignition engine: Experiments and 0D/1D predictive modelling for combustion, performance, and emissions. Fuel 393: 134657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134657 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134657
|
| [13] |
Prasad BSN, Kumar GN (2023) Influence of ignition timing on performance and emission characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline. Energy Sources Part A 45: 4652–4666. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1670292 doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1670292
|
| [14] |
Zhang MM, Cao JB (2024) Effects of lean burn on combustion and emissions of a DISI engine fueled with methanol-gasoline blends. Energies 17: 4023. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164023 doi: 10.3390/en17164023
|
| [15] |
Zhang MM, Cao JB (2024) Comparative study on combustion and emission characteristics of methanol/gasoline blend fueled DISI engine under different stratified lean burn modes. Fuel Process Technol 266: 108160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2024.108160 doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2024.108160
|
| [16] |
Zhang MM, Cao JB (2025) Effects of two-stage injection on combustion and particulate emissions of a direct injection spark-ignition engine fueled with methanol-gasoline blends. Energies 18: 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020415 doi: 10.3390/en18020415
|
| [17] |
Sharma N, Agarwal AK (2022) Microscopic spray characteristics of ethanol and methanol blended gasoline in a direct injection spark ignition engine. Int J Engine Res 23: 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087420987763 doi: 10.1177/1468087420987763
|
| [18] |
Feng S, Hong W, Li XP, et al. (2020) The influence of DISI engine control parameters and M15 fuel on regulated and particulate emissions under light-load. Fuel 276: 118024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118024 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118024
|
| [19] |
Yu J, Zhou F, Fu J, et al. (2024) Research on the influence of injection strategies on the in-cylinder combustion process and emissions of methanol. Biomass Bioenergy 188: 107340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107340 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107340
|
| [20] |
Kalwar A, Singh RK, Gupta A, et al. (2023) Particulates, unregulated and regulated emissions and catalytic converter efficiency evaluation of methanol (M15) fuelled BS-VI compliant light-duty spark-ignition engine. Sci Total Environ 902: 166047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166047 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166047
|
| [21] |
Singh AP, Sonawane U, Agarwal AK (2022) Methanol/Ethanol/Butanol-Gasoline blends use in transportation engine—Part 2: Composition, morphology, and characteristics of particulates. J Energy Resour Technol 144: 101901. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053986 doi: 10.1115/1.4053986
|
| [22] |
Zhang Z, Wen MS, Cui YQ, et al. (2022) Effects of methanol application on carbon emissions and pollutant emissions using a passenger vehicle. Processes 10: 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030525 doi: 10.3390/pr10030525
|
| [23] |
Sarıkoç S (2021) Effect of H2 addition to methanol-gasoline blend on an SI engine at various lambda values and engine loads: A case of performance, combustion, and emission characteristics. Fuel 297: 120732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120732 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120732
|
| [24] |
Duan XB, Chu XH, Wang RM, et al. (2025) The performance and emissions characteristics of the gasoline spark ignition engine fuelled with green and renewable methanol and hydrogen. Renewable Energy 240: 122184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122184 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.122184
|
| [25] |
Ahmed E, Usman M, Anwar S, et al. (2021) Application of ANN to predict performance and emissions of SI engine using gasoline-methanol blends. Sci Prog 104: 00368504211002345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211002345 doi: 10.1177/00368504211002345
|
| [26] |
Sharma N, Patel C, Tiwari N, et al. (2019) Experimental investigations of noise and vibration characteristics of gasoline-methanol blend fuelled gasoline direct injection engine and their relationship with combustion characteristics. Appl Therm Eng 158: 113754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113754 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113754
|
| [27] |
Javanshayani F, Shamekhi AH (2025) Modern gasoline direct-injection engines: Key challenges and mitigation pathways: A critical review. Int J Engine Res 26: 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874251382740 doi: 10.1177/14680874251382740
|
| [28] |
Bharath BK, Selvan VAM (2021) Influence of higher alcohol additives in methanol-gasoline blends on the performance and emissions of an unmodified automotive SI engine: A review. Arab J Sci Eng 46: 7057–7085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05408-x doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-05408-x
|
| [29] |
Gassoumi M, Boutar Z, Shah RMRA, et al. (2023) Methanol as a fuel additive: Effect on the performance and emissions of a gasoline engine. Energy Sources Part A 45: 9485–9497. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2240741 doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2240741
|
| [30] |
Topgül T, Cınar C, Ozdemir O (2021) The variations of the exhaust emissions at low ambient temperature for E10 and M10 fueled SI engine. J Therm Sci Technol 41: 227–237. https://doi.org/10.47480/isibted.1025931 doi: 10.47480/isibted.1025931
|
| [31] |
Cesur I, Uysal F (2024) Experimental investigation and artificial neural network-based modelling of thermal barrier engine performance and exhaust emissions for methanol-gasoline blends. Energy 291: 130393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130393 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130393
|
| [32] |
Farooq MS, Baig A, Wei Y, et al. (2024) Comprehensive review on technical developments of methanol-fuel-based spark ignition engines to improve the performance, combustion, and emissions. J Energy Resour Technol 146: 070801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065249 doi: 10.1115/1.4065249
|
| [33] |
Wouters C, Burkardt P, Pischinger S (2022) Limits of compression ratio in spark-ignition combustion with methanol. Int J Engine Res 23: 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874211043390 doi: 10.1177/14680874211043390
|
| [34] |
Agarwal A, Yadav O, Valera H (2024) Methanol (M85) port fuel-injected spark ignition motorcycle engine development—Part 1: Combustion optimization for efficiency improvement and emission reduction. SAE Int J Engines 17: 321–340. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-03-0018 doi: 10.4271/03-17-03-0018
|
| [35] |
Singh H, Li C, Cheng P, et al. (2022) A critical review of technologies, costs, and projects for production of carbon-neutral liquid e-fuels from hydrogen and captured CO2. Energy Adv 1: 580. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2YA00173J doi: 10.1039/D2YA00173J
|
| [36] |
Di Iorio S, Catapano F, Magno A, et al. (2023) The potential of ethanol/methanol blends as renewable fuels for DI SI engines. Energies 16: 2791. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062791 doi: 10.3390/en16062791
|
| [37] |
Mokhtar, Sumarsono DA, Agama AA, et al. (2025) Performance, emissions, and combustion analysis of gasoline-ethanol-methanol blends in a spark-ignition engine. Results Eng 26: 105264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105264 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105264
|
| [38] | Martin A, O'Malley J (2021) Compatibility of methanol fuel blends with gasoline vehicles and engines in Indonesia. ICCT report. Available from: https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Methanol-Indonesia-ENG-dec21.pdf. |
| [39] |
Kumar TS, Ashok B (2023) Material compatibility of SI engine components towards corrosive effects on methanol-gasoline blends for flex fuel applications. Mater Chem Phys 296: 127344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127344 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127344
|
| [40] |
Nuthan Prasad BS, Pandey JK, Kumar GN (2020) Impact of changing compression ratio on engine characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline. Energy 191: 116605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116605 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116605
|
| [41] |
Dobberkau M, Werner R, Atzler F (2024) Methanol, the ICE green maker. Chem Ing Tech 96: 1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202400021 doi: 10.1002/cite.202400021
|
| [42] |
Chandra K, Lakhsminarayanan PA, Agarwal AK (2025) Feasibility of methanol-gasoline blends in a production grade spark ignited carbureted genset engine: Particulate characterization and soot morphology. Fuel 389: 134461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134461 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134461
|
| [43] |
Fioroni GM, Christensen E, Fouts L, et al. (2019) Heat of vaporization and species evolution during gasoline evaporation measured by DSC/TGA/MS for blends of C1 to C4 alcohols in commercial gasoline blendstocks. International Powertrains, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0014 doi: 10.4271/2019-01-0014
|
| [44] |
Ailaboina A, Saha K (2023) Modeling the spray characteristics of blended fuels for gasoline direct injection applications. Int J Green Energy 20: 1326–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2057801 doi: 10.1080/15435075.2022.2057801
|
| [45] |
Wang Q, Zhang C, Jia M, et al. (2026) Material compatibility of methanol fuel with non-metallic components in engine fuel systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 65: 3188–3200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c03249 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5c03249
|
| [46] |
Murad SHM, Camm J, Davy M, et al. (2016) Spray behaviour and particulate matter emissions with M15 methanol/gasoline blends in a GDI engine. SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0991 doi: 10.4271/2016-01-0991
|
| [47] |
Gassoumi M, Hamdi F, Boutar Z, et al. (2025) Performance and emissions assessment of a spark-ignition engine fueled with ethanol-, methanol- and acetone-gasoline blends. J Therm Eng 11: 1064–1074. https://doi.org/10.14744/thermal.0000964 doi: 10.14744/thermal.0000964
|
| [48] |
Agarwal A, Yadav O, Valera H (2024) Methanol (M85) port-fuel-injected spark ignition motorcycle engine development—Part 2: Dynamic performance, transient emissions, and catalytic converter effectiveness. SAE Int J Engines 17: 341–353. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-03-0019 doi: 10.4271/03-17-03-0019
|
| [49] |
Chandra K, Lakhsminarayanan PA, Agarwal AK (2025) Feasibility of methanol-gasoline blends in a production grade spark ignited carbureted genset engine—Part 1: Engine performance, combustion and emission characteristics. ASME Open J Eng 4: 041014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068675 doi: 10.1115/1.4068675
|
| [50] |
Ma R, Feng H, Zhang S, et al. (2024) Study on the effect of low carbon alcohol gasoline stratified injection strategy on engine knock combustion under lean burn conditions. Energy 313: 133716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133716 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133716
|
| [51] |
Son J, Bae G, Moon S (2025) Injection rate and flow characteristics of gasoline-methanol blended fuels from GDI injector according to methanol blending ratio. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 169: 109545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109545 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109545
|
| [52] |
Chakradhar M, Ramadhas A, Shanti P, et al. (2023) Material compatibility of elastomers and plastics in gasoline-ethanol-methanol blends. WCX SAE World Congress Experience, Detroit, Michigan, United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-0336 doi: 10.4271/2023-01-0336
|
| [53] |
Abdellatief TMM, Ershov MA, Savelenko VD, et al. (2023) Advanced progress and prospects for producing high-octane gasoline fuel toward market development: State-of-the-art and outlook. Energy Fuels 37: 18266–18290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02541 doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02541
|
| [54] |
Bulbul NE, Çakmak A (2025) The effectiveness of iso-alcohols in reducing vapor pressure and enhancing fuel properties of ethanol-gasoline mixtures. Int J Automot Eng Technol 14: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1591917 doi: 10.18245/ijaet.1591917
|
| [55] |
Geng Z, Ding C, Hu J, et al. (2025) Revealing a new mechanism of stable intersolubility of methanol-n-heptane blended fuel assisted by co-solvents at the microscopic molecular level: Insights and validation from quantum chemical simulation. J Mol Liq 417: 126626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126626 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126626
|
| [56] |
Shenbagamuthuraman V, Patel A, Vemuluri S, et al. (2022) Progress on compatibility issues of alcohols on automotive materials: Kinetics, challenges and future prospects-A comprehensive review. Process Saf Environ Prot 162: 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.022 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.022
|
| [57] |
Müller M, Mishra RK, Šleger V, et al. (2024) Elastomer-based sealing o-rings and their compatibility with methanol, ethanol, and hydrotreated vegetable oil for fueling internal combustion engines. Materials 17: 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020430 doi: 10.3390/ma17020430
|
| [58] |
Boggavarapu P, Mallikarjun AB, Mendu H, et al. (2025) Performance and emission measurement of spark ignition engines operating with 100% methanol fuel. Heat Transf Eng 46: 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2024.2347177 doi: 10.1080/01457632.2024.2347177
|
| [59] |
Turner JWG, Lewis AGJ, Akehurst S, et al. (2018) Alcohol fuels for spark-ignition engines: Performance, efficiency and emission effects at mid to high blend rates for binary mixtures and pure components. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 232: 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407017752832 doi: 10.1177/0954407017752832
|
| [60] |
Gong C, Yi L, Zhang Z, et al. (2020) Assessment of ultra-lean burn characteristics for a stratified-charge direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine under different high compression ratios. Appl Energy 261: 114478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114478 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114478
|
| [61] |
Ismael MA, El-Adawy M, Khedr AM, et al. (2026) Comparative experimental assessment of methanol, ethanol, and butanol fuels in a spark-ignition engine: Combustion, performance, and emissions. J Energy Resour Technol Part A 2: 042301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071226 doi: 10.1115/1.4071226
|
| [62] |
Feng H, Xiao S, Nan Z, et al. (2021) Thermodynamic analysis of using ethanol-methanol-gasoline blends in a turbocharged, spark-ignition engine. J Energy Resour Technol 143: 120903. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050783 doi: 10.1115/1.4050783
|
| [63] |
Fatouraie M, Frommherz M, Mosburger M, et al. (2018) Investigation of the impact of fuel properties on particulate number emission of a modern gasoline direct injection engine. WCX World Congress Experience, Detroit, Michigan, United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0358 doi: 10.4271/2018-01-0358
|
| [64] |
Gong C, Huang W, Liu J, et al. (2018) Detection and analysis of formaldehyde and unburned methanol emissions from a direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine. Fuel 221: 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.115 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.115
|
| [65] |
Yang S, Feng J, Sun P, et al. (2023) Combustion and emissions characteristics of methanol/gasoline CISI engines under different injection modes. Fuel 333: 126506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126506 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126506
|
| [66] |
Xia C, Zhao T, Fang J, et al. (2022) Experimental study of stratified lean burn characteristics on a dual injection gasoline engine. Front Energy 16: 900–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0812-6 doi: 10.1007/s11708-021-0812-6
|
| [67] |
Ahamad J, Kumar P, Dhar A (2024) Effect of multi-injection strategy on characteristics of methanol-fueled direct injection spark ignition engine. Phys Fluids 36: 047107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0198169 doi: 10.1063/5.0198169
|
| [68] |
Malik MAI, Usman M, Akhtar M, et al. (2023) Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance, and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends. Sci Prog 106: 00368504221148342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504221148342 doi: 10.1177/00368504221148342
|
| [69] |
Örs İ, Yelbey S, Gülcan HE, et al. (2023) Evaluation of detailed combustion, energy and exergy analysis on ethanol-gasoline and methanol-gasoline blends of a spark ignition engine. Fuel 354: 129340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129340 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129340
|
| [70] |
Liu X, Shakeel MR, Raman V, et al. (2025) Assessment of methanol combustion engines in spark ignition, spark-, and glow plug-assisted compression ignition modes. Appl Therm Eng 280: 128538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128538 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128538
|
| [71] |
Feng H, Lai K, Zheng Z, et al. (2024) Effects of methanol direct injection and high compression ratio on improving the performances of a spark-ignition passenger car engine. Fuel 357: 130052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130052 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130052
|
| [72] |
Elfasakhany A (2015) Investigations on the effects of ethanol–methanol–gasoline blends in a spark-ignition engine: Performance and emissions analysis. Eng Sci Technol Int J 18: 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.05.003
|
| [73] |
Malik MAI, Usman M, Hayat N, et al. (2021) Experimental evaluation of methanol-gasoline fuel blend on performance, emissions and lubricant oil deterioration in SI engine. Adv Mech Eng 13: 16878140211025213. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211025213 doi: 10.1177/16878140211025213
|
| [74] |
Celik MB (2008) Experimental determination of suitable ethanol-gasoline blend rate at high compression ratio for gasoline engine. Appl Therm Eng 28: 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.10.028 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.10.028
|
| [75] |
Balki MK, Sayin C (2014) The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion of an SI engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline. Energy 71: 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.074 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.074
|
| [76] |
Akbiyik T, Kahraman N, Taner T (2023) Energy and exergy analysis with emissions evaluation of a gasoline engine using different fuels. Fuel 345: 128189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128189 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128189
|
| [77] |
Sathish Kumar T, Ashok B (2024) Development of combustion control map for flex fuel operation in methanol powered direct injection SI engine. Energy 288: 129695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129695 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129695
|
| [78] |
Cesur I (2022) Investigation of the effects of water injection into an SI engine running on M15 methanol fuel on engine performance and exhaust emissions. Energy 261: 125203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125203 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125203
|
| [79] |
Choi J, Lim O (2025) An investigation of ultra-lean combustion characteristics of methanol direct injection in a rapid compression expansion machine with various coil spark ignition strategies. Fuel 389: 134612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134612 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134612
|
| [80] |
Wei H, Zhang Z, Zhang X, et al. (2025) Overview for methanol and formaldehyde unregulated emissions of methanol fueled engines. J Energy Inst 120: 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2025.102089 doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2025.102089
|
| [81] |
Kumar TS, Ashok B (2021) Critical review on combustion phenomena of low carbon alcohols in SI engine with its challenges and future directions. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 152: 111702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111702 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111702
|
| [82] |
Miganakallu N, Yang Z, Rogóż R, et al. (2020) Effect of water-methanol blends on engine performance at borderline knock conditions in gasoline direct injection engines. Appl Energy 264: 114750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114750 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114750
|
| [83] |
Duan W, Geng X, Zhang S, et al. (2025) Lean combustion effects on a high-compression methanol SI engine derived from a turbocharged miller cycle gasoline engine. Adv Mech Eng 17: 16878132251383368. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132251383368 doi: 10.1177/16878132251383368
|
| [84] |
Chandra K, Lakhsminarayanan PA, Agarwal AK (2025) Feasibility of methanol-gasoline blends in a production grade spark-ignited carbureted genset engine—Part 2: Unregulated emission characteristics. ASME Open J Eng 4: 041015. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068676 doi: 10.1115/1.4068676
|
| [85] |
Kalwar A, Singh RK, Gupta A, et al. (2023) Combustion and performance evaluation of methanol (M15)-Fueled BS-VI compliant light-duty spark-ignition engine. ASME Open J Eng 2: 021050. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063343 doi: 10.1115/1.4063343
|
| [86] |
Marwaha A, Subramanian KA (2025) Control of regulated and unregulated emissions of an automotive spark ignition engine with alternative fuels (methanol, ethanol and hydrogen). Meas Energy 5: 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100039 doi: 10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100039
|
| [87] |
Örs İ, Gülcan HE, Sayın Kul B, et al. (2022) Evaluation of the effects of methanol and ethanol additions on performance and emissions in a spark plug ignition engine fueled with gasoline. Int J Automot Sci Technol 6: 156–164. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1081731 doi: 10.30939/ijastech..1081731
|
| [88] |
Zhou Y, Xie F, Zhang B, et al. (2025) Research on combustion cycle-by-cycle variations under high load in SACI mode and application potential of i-EGR coupling air dilution when fueled with methanol and gasoline. Int J Engine Res 26: 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874241274560 doi: 10.1177/14680874241274560
|
| [89] |
Yuan B, Zhang X, Cao J, et al. (2025) Investigation on the development law of methanol spray impinging on intake valve during port fuel injection. Energy 320: 135250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135250 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135250
|
| [90] |
Li X, Zhen X, Wang Y, et al. (2022) Numerical comparative study on performance and emissions characteristics fueled with methanol, ethanol and methane in high compression spark ignition engine. Energy 254: 124374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124374 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124374
|
| [91] |
Gong C, Liu J, Peng L, et al. (2017) Numerical study of effect of injection and ignition timings on combustion and unregulated emissions of DISI methanol engine during cold start. Renewable Energy 112: 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.055 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.055
|
| [92] |
Han T, Singh R, Lavoie G, et al. (2020) Multiple injection for improving knock, gaseous and particulate matter emissions in direct injection SI engines. Appl Energy 262: 114578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114578 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114578
|
| [93] |
Shen B, Su Y, Yu H, et al. (2023) Experimental study on the effect of injection strategies on the combustion and emissions characteristic of gasoline/methanol dual-fuel turbocharged engine under high load. Energy 282: 128925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128925 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128925
|
| [94] |
Wang J, Tian H, Zhang R, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation on the effects of direct injection timing on the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of methanol/gasoline dual-fuel spark turbocharged ignition (DFSI) engine with different injection pressures under high load. Energies 16: 7921. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16247921 doi: 10.3390/en16247921
|
| [95] |
Farooq MS, Baig A, Wei Y, et al. (2025) A concise review of developments to overcome the cold start problems by analyzing combustion and emissions of methanol-based-fueled spark ignition engines. Int J Hydrogen Energy 99: 852–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.263 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.263
|
| [96] |
Gong C, Liu Z, Su H, et al. (2019) Effect of injection strategy on cold start firing, combustion and emissions of a LPG/methanol dual-fuel spark-ignition engine. Energy 178: 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.145 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.145
|
| [97] | Wang MQ (1999) GREET 1.5—Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model. Volume 1: Methodology, development, use, and results. Available from: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15284. |
| [98] |
Masum FH, Tan ECD, Kolodziej CP, et al. (2025) Life cycle assessment of methanol from fossil, biomass, and waste sources, and its use as a marine fuel in dual-fuel engines. Environ Sci Technol 59: 23239–23250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c08873 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c08873
|
| [99] |
Peng S, Tang Y, Tang J, et al. (2025) Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of renewable methanol production from MSW integrated with oxy-fuel combustion and solid oxide electrolysis cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 99: 872–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.232 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.232
|
| [100] |
Badger N, Amini S (2025) Comparative life cycle assessment of various hydrogen pathways for cleaner methanol synthesis. J Clean Prod 533: 146993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146993 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146993
|
| [101] |
Nemmour A, Inayat A, Janajreh I, et al. (2023) Green hydrogen-based E-fuels (E-methane, E-methanol, E-ammonia) to support clean energy transition: A literature review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48: 29011–29033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.240 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.240
|
| [102] |
Pérez-Fortes M, Schöneberger JC, Boulamanti A, et al. (2016) Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Appl Energy 161: 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.067 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.067
|
| [103] |
Pfennig M, Böttger D, Häckner B, et al. (2023) Global GIS-based potential analysis and cost assessment of Power-to-X fuels in 2050. Appl Energy 347: 121289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121289 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121289
|
| [104] |
Alhyari M, Al-Salaymeh A, Irshidat M, et al. (2019) The impact of energy source on the life-cycle assessment of power-to-liquid fuels. J Ecol Eng 20: 239–244. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/104659 doi: 10.12911/22998993/104659
|
| [105] | Aramco, Methanol Institute. (2024) Accelerating the net-zero transition: Assessing potentials of e-fuels in China's road transport. Available from: https://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/AramcoMI-Joint-Report-Final.pdf. |
| [106] |
Duan Q, Li T, Liu D, et al. (2024) Improving the lean burn performance of a high compression ratio methanol engine by multiple-injection. Appl Therm Eng 236: 121481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121481 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121481
|
| [107] |
Badawy T, Panithasan MS, Turner JWG, et al. (2024) Performance and emissions evaluation of a multi-cylinder research engine fueled with ethanol, methanol, gasoline Euro-6, E85, and iso-stoichiometric ternary GEM mixtures operated at lean conditions. Fuel 363: 130962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130962 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130962
|
| [108] |
Zhao LF, Wang DF, Qi WQ (2020) Particulate matter emissions and performance of bio-butanol-methanol-gasoline blends coupled with air dilution in SI engines. J Aerosol Sci 145: 105546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105546 doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105546
|
| [109] |
Ziyad F, Aman S, Alemayehu H, et al. (2026) Optimizing SI engine performance and emissions with gasoline-ethanol and gasoline-methanol blends. Clean Energy Sustainable 4: 10003. https://doi.org/10.70322/ces.2026.10003 doi: 10.70322/ces.2026.10003
|
| [110] |
Fasihi M, Breyer C (2024) Global production potential of green methanol based on variable renewable electricity. Energy Environ Sci 17: 3503–3522. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE02951D doi: 10.1039/D3EE02951D
|
| [111] |
Li P, Lin J, Yu Z, et al. (2024) Feasibility study of renewable e-methanol production: A substitution pathway from blue to green. iEnergy 3: 108–114. https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2024.0013 doi: 10.23919/IEN.2024.0013
|
| [112] |
De Felice G, Eichkorn S, Gallucci F, et al. (2025) Techno-economic analysis of plasma-assisted CO2 hydrogenation to methanol: feasibility and the impact of electricity supply. EES Catal 3: 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EY00130G doi: 10.1039/D5EY00130G
|
| [113] |
Bozzini MM, Signorelli M, Moioli E, et al. (2025) Techno-economic-assessment of the methanol synthesis from captured CO2 and modular nuclear power-based electrolysis. J CO2 Util 101: 103186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103186 doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103186
|
| [114] |
Zhang W, Wen C, Zhang X, et al. (2025) A review of green methanol production: technologies, economic evaluation, and carbon emission analysis. Energy Fuels 39: 18733–18750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c03278 doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c03278
|
| [115] |
Khawaja R, Musa T, Challiwala MS, et al. (2025) Decarbonizing methanol synthesis via low-carbon hydrogen: Process simulation and techno-economic insights. Front Chem Eng 7: 1717905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2025.1717905 doi: 10.3389/fceng.2025.1717905
|
| [116] |
Nunes LJR (2025) Renewable methanol as an agent for the decarbonization of maritime logistic systems: A review. Future Transp 5: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5020054 doi: 10.3390/futuretransp5020054
|
| [117] |
Ismail AM, Metwalli MMA, Alamoush AS (2025) Towards safe maritime decarbonization: Safety barriers of methanol fuel. Sustainability 17: 4896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114896 doi: 10.3390/su17114896
|
| [118] | Transportation Energy Institute (2024) E-fuels: Evaluating the viability of commercially deploying e-fuels in road transport. Available from: https://www.transportationenergy.org/research/reports/e-fuels-evaluating-the-viability-of-commercially-deploying-e-fuels-in-road-transport/. |
| [119] | BloombergNEF, Climate Technology Coalition (2024) Scaling up hydrogen: The case for low-carbon methanol. Available from: https://assets.bbhub.io/media/sites/25/2024/06/BNEF-Methanol-Report_to-publish.pdf. |
| [120] | U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) Gasoline and diesel fuel update. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel. |
| [121] | Methanex Corporation (2026) Methanol pricing: Regional posted contract prices. Available from: https://www.methanex.com/our-products/about-methanol/pricing. |
| [122] | Alternative Fuels Data Center (2024) Fuel properties comparison chart. U.S. Department of Energy. Available from: https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/fuel_comparison_chart.pdf. |
| [123] | Mission Green Fuels (2024) Roadmap for green fuels in transport and industry. Available from: https://missiongreenfuels.dk/roadmap-for-green-fuels/. |
| [124] |
Zhang Y, Su Y, Li X, et al. (2025) Study and prediction on macroscopic characteristics of free spray of typical alcohol fuels through experimentation and the artificial neural network. Energy 316: 134610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134610 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134610
|
| [125] |
Xi D, Chen S, Xiao G, et al. (2025) Comprehensive performance improvement of methanol/diesel dual-fuel engines using multi-physics field coupling simulation and surrogate-assisted many-objective optimization. Energy 340: 139185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139185 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139185
|
Figures(12) / Tables(7)
Zewei Hao, Danfeng Du, Xiangnan Bu, Zexin Liu, Chaowei Sun, Xiurong Guo. Methanol-gasoline blends in spark-ignition engines: A review of research progress and application prospects[J]. AIMS Energy, 2026, 14(4): 834-873. doi: 10.3934/energy.2026034
DownLoad: