Research article Special Issues

Techno-Economic design and sizing of a grid-connected solar-wind-storage system for green hydrogen production

  • Published: 14 May 2026
  • In this paper, we present an economic optimization and sizing study of a hybrid solar-wind system integrated with energy storage and grid connection for green hydrogen production. The proposed model used nonlinear constrained optimization to determine the optimal capacities of photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, storage devices, and electrolyzers to maximize the net present value (NPV) of the investment. The system operation was simulated over a multi-year horizon accounting for intermittent renewable generation profiles, electricity market prices, and operational constraints. The optimization yielded an optimal configuration with 85.95 kW of solar PV, 59.87 kW of wind power, 64.18 kW/100 kWh of battery storage, and 100 kW of electrolyzer capacity, achieving a cumulative hydrogen production of 318,545 kg over 20 years. The system achieved a NPV of 524,720 USD with a Levelized Cost of Hydrogen of 3.35 USD/kg. Sensitivity analyses revealed that NPV varied from approximately 60,000 USD to 180,000 USD as the discount rate increased from 2% to 16% and showed a strong positive correlation with hydrogen selling prices. The results demonstrated the techno-economic feasibility of hybrid renewable systems for sustainable hydrogen production, highlighting the trade-offs between capital expenditure and operational revenues.

    Citation: Saleh Albadran, Ismail Marouani. Techno-Economic design and sizing of a grid-connected solar-wind-storage system for green hydrogen production[J]. AIMS Energy, 2026, 14(3): 494-520. doi: 10.3934/energy.2026021

    Related Papers:

  • In this paper, we present an economic optimization and sizing study of a hybrid solar-wind system integrated with energy storage and grid connection for green hydrogen production. The proposed model used nonlinear constrained optimization to determine the optimal capacities of photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, storage devices, and electrolyzers to maximize the net present value (NPV) of the investment. The system operation was simulated over a multi-year horizon accounting for intermittent renewable generation profiles, electricity market prices, and operational constraints. The optimization yielded an optimal configuration with 85.95 kW of solar PV, 59.87 kW of wind power, 64.18 kW/100 kWh of battery storage, and 100 kW of electrolyzer capacity, achieving a cumulative hydrogen production of 318,545 kg over 20 years. The system achieved a NPV of 524,720 USD with a Levelized Cost of Hydrogen of 3.35 USD/kg. Sensitivity analyses revealed that NPV varied from approximately 60,000 USD to 180,000 USD as the discount rate increased from 2% to 16% and showed a strong positive correlation with hydrogen selling prices. The results demonstrated the techno-economic feasibility of hybrid renewable systems for sustainable hydrogen production, highlighting the trade-offs between capital expenditure and operational revenues.



    加载中


    [1] Yu J, Qian C, Yang Q, et al. (2023) The energy saving potential of a new ventilation roof with stabilized phase change material in hot summer region. Renewable Energy 212: 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.012 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.012
    [2] Savio FM, Joshua SV, Usha K, et al. (2025) Design of a solar-wind hybrid renewable energy system for power quality enhancement: A case study of 2.5 MW real time domestic grid. Eng Rep 7: e13101. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.13101 doi: 10.1002/eng2.13101
    [3] Khamharnphol R, Kamdar I, Waewsak J, et al. (2023) Microgrid hybrid solar/wind/diesel and battery energy storage power generation system: Application to Koh Samui, Southern Thailand. Int J Renewable Energy Dev 12: 216−226. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.47761 doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.47761
    [4] Eroğlu H, Kurtuluş O (2025) Strategic design of wind energy and battery storage for efficient and sustainable energy systems. Sci Rep 15: 34976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18863-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18863-5
    [5] Gorman W, Rand J, Cheyette A, et al. (2025) Hybrid power plants: Status of operating and proposed plants. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Empirical report. Available from: https://escholarship.org/content/qt7x96k0wx/qt7x96k0wx.pdf.
    [6] Soudagar MEM, Ramesh S, Khan TMY, et al. (2024) An overview of the existing and future state of the art advancement of hybrid energy systems based on PV-solar and wind. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 19: 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctad123 doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctad123
    [7] Li L, Wang X (2021) Design and operation of hybrid renewable energy systems: Current status and future perspectives. Curr Opin Chem Eng 31: 100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2021.100669 doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2021.100669
    [8] Market analysis (2025) Hybrid solar wind energy storage market. Future Market Insights. Available from: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/hybrid-solar-wind-energy-storage-market.
    [9] Enerzine (2025) Combining solar, wind, and storage: Keys to a resilient power grid. Available from: https://www.enerzine.com.
    [10] Su W, Zhang W, Li Q, et al. (2023) Capacity configuration optimization for green hydrogen generation driven by solar-wind hybrid power based on comprehensive performance criteria. Front Energy Res 11: 123456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1256463 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1256463
    [11] Alharbi AM, Ali ZM, Diab AAZ (2025) Comparative techno-economic optimization of microgrid configurations using hybrid battery-hydrogen storage: NEOM case study, Saudi Arabia. PLOS One 20: e0326050. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326050 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326050
    [12] Wei D, He M, Zhang J, et al. (2024) Enhancing the economic efficiency of wind-photovoltaic-hydrogen complementary power systems via optimizing capacity allocation. J Energy Storage 104: 114531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.114531 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.114531
    [13] Okonkwo PC, Islam Md S, Taura UH, et al. (2024) A techno-economic analysis of renewable hybrid energy systems for hydrogen production at refueling stations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 78: 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.294 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.294
    [14] Okonkwo PC, Nwokolo SC, Meyer EL, et al. (2025) Techno-economic optimization of renewable hydrogen infrastructure via AI-based dynamic pricing. Sci Rep 15: 31529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17506-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17506-z
    [15] Ali MF, Biswas D, Sheikh Md RI, et al. (2025) Techno-economic optimization of battery storage technologies for off-grid hybrid microgrids in multiple rural locations of Bangladesh. Front Energy Res, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1654615 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1654615
    [16] Batablinle L, Kongnine DM, Panafeïkow P, et al. (2025) Modeling and optimization of hybrid hydro-solar-wind systems for green hydrogen production in Togo. Int J Renewable Energy Dev 14: 813–828. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2025.61136 doi: 10.61435/ijred.2025.61136
    [17] Hassanein MA, Mohamed MA, Hassan AA (2025) Optimization of standalone hybrid renewable energy systems using different metaheuristic techniques considering demand side management. J Adv Eng Trends 44: 159–186. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaet.2024.317653.1326 doi: 10.21608/jaet.2024.317653.1326
    [18] Ayua TJ, Emetere ME (2024) Technical and economic simulation of a hybrid renewable energy power system design for industrial application. Sci Rep 14: 28739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77946-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77946-x
    [19] Bhandari B, Poudel SR, Lee KT, et al. (2014) Mathematical modeling of hybrid renewable energy system: A review on small hydro-solar-wind power generation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 1: 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0021-4 doi: 10.1007/s40684-014-0021-4
    [20] Kelvin EB (2023) Hybrid renewable energy systems modeling. Eng Sci Technol J 4: 571–588. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v4i6.1255 doi: 10.51594/estj.v4i6.1255
    [21] Hassan Q, Algburi S, Sameen AZ, et al. (2023) A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Solar and wind-powered solutions: Challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. Results Eng 20: 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621
    [22] Suresh V, Muralidhar M, Kiranmayi R (2020) Modelling and optimization of an off-grid hybrid renewable energy system for electrification in a rural areas. Energy Rep 6: 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.01.013 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.01.013
    [23] Dosa A, Olanrewaju OA, Mora-Camino F (2025) A comprehensive review of hybrid renewable microgrids: Key design parameters, optimization techniques, and the role of demand response in enhancing system flexibility. Energies 18: 5154. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195154 doi: 10.3390/en18195154
    [24] Abd El-Razik SM, Gad MS, Emara A (2023) Numerical modeling of dry cell alkaline electrolyzer for HHO production. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E 239: 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089231190302 doi: 10.1177/09544089231190302
    [25] Katz J, Chernyakhovskiy I (2020) Variable renewable energy grid integration studies: A guidebook for practitioners. Greening the Grid. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/72143.pdf.
    [26] Jin L, Zhong S, Su B, et al. (2025) EV-integrated and grid-connected hybrid renewable energy system: A two-stage optimization strategy. Energy 330: 136858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136858 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136858
    [27] Kanaga BN, Abirami M, Vighneshwari D, et al. (2025) Techno-economic optimization of hybrid renewable systems for sustainable energy solutions. Sci Rep, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08171-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08171-3
    [28] Qasim MA, Yaqoob SJ, Bajaj M, et al. (2025) Techno-economic optimization of hybrid power systems for sustainable energy in remote communities of Iraq. Results Eng 25: 104283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104283 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104283
    [29] Khan AA, Minai AF, Hakami A (2025) Optimization and techno-economic-environmental analysis of a grid-tied hybrid renewable energy system for a subtropical Indian University. Discov Sustain 6: 792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01745-1 doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01745-1
    [30] Alhayali OJ, Mehrtash M (2024) Techno-economic optimization of hybrid energy systems for zero energy buildings in remote communities: A case study from Turkey. J Build Des Environ. https://doi.org/10.70401/jbde.2024.0002
    [31] Berrada A, Sanjari MJ, El Mrabet R (2025) Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production: Comparative analysis of electrolyser technologies in a hybrid PV/wind system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 141: 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.384
    [32] Anwar N, Baig MS, Barkat E, et al. (2026). Comparative performance evaluation of solar and wind based electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. EPJ Web of Conferences 351: 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635101002 doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202635101002
    [33] Saif AGH, Alquaity ABS, Mokheimer EMA (2025) Techno-economic analysis of green hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia: A comparative study of solar PV and CSP technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 105: 1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.043 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.043
    [34] Marocco P, Gandiglio M, Cianella R, et al. (2024) Design of hydrogen production systems powered by solar and wind energy: An insight into the optimal size ratios. Energy Convers Manage 314: 118646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118646 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118646
    [35] Karabuga A, Cüce E, Cüce PM, et al. (2026) Comparative performance and economic analysis for different clean energy and hydrogen production systems: A case study for Türkiye. Int J Hydrogen Energy 201: 152933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152933 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152933
    [36] Andoni M, Couraud B, Robu V, et al. (2025) Comparative techno-economic assessment of wind-powered green hydrogen pathways. 2025 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope64741.2025.11305392
    [37] Gao C, Sun K, Song KW, et al. (2024) Performance improvement of a thermal management system for Lithium-ion power battery pack by the combination of phase change material and heat pipe. J Energy Storage 82: 110512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110512 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.110512
    [38] Wu K, Wang L, Ha H, et al. (2025) Dynamic line rating and optimal transmission switching for maximizing renewable energy sources injection with voltage stability constraint. Appl Energy 378: 124651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124651 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124651
    [39] Oyewo AS, Kunkar A, Satymov R, et al. (2025) A multi-sector, multi-node, and multi-scenario energy system analysis for the Caribbean with focus on the role of offshore floating photovoltaics. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 210: 115189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115189 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115189
    [40] Ruan P, Su Q, Zhang L, et al. (2025) Optimal siting and sizing of hybrid energy storage systems in high-penetration renewable energy systems. Energies 18: 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092196 doi: 10.3390/en18092196
    [41] Pang K, Dimeas AL, Hatziargyriou ND, et al. (2025) Collaborative switch placement and operational measures to enhance distribution system flexibility considering uncertain operation costs. Energy 320: 134982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134982 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134982
    [42] Hadjeri S, Boubekeur H, Hanafi S, et al. (2025) Optimizing cost and performance of hybrid photovoltaic-diesel systems for off-grid energy solutions. Eurasia Proc Sci Technol Eng Math 38: 166–171. Available from: https://www.epstem.net/index.php/epstem/article/view/1214/1213.
    [43] Shayan ME (2025) Solar energy storage systems: A comprehensive study for techno-economic aspects and sustainable grid integration. J Clean Prod 529: 146811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146811 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146811
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(162) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog