In this work, the enhancement of the solar cell output in a light-dependent resistor (LDR)-based dual-axis solar tracking system (DASTS) in a fixed solar panel system was quantified under different seasons and weather conditions in the city of Qingdao, China. Measurement results show that DASTS could significantly improve power generation efficiency, providing 9.9%–12.8% and 30.6%–32.8% extra daily power output over a fixed-angle system in winter and spring, respectively. It was also found that the power output of the solar panel is higher during the noon period of winter than in spring. Special attention was therefore placed on the effect of panel temperature on the solar panel photovoltaic (PV) conversion efficiency. A clear inverse relationship was observed between the two factors, with the PV conversion efficiency decreasing from 14.7% to 9.8% with an increased panel temperature from 20 to 55 ℃. It is concluded that, to achieve maximum solar cell panel power output, the panel temperature effect needs to be taken into consideration.
Citation: Zongjin Li, Chi Liu, Guoyang Song, Defa Han, Yingge Li, Dongxing Du. Photovoltaic power generation enhancement performance with a LDR-based dual-axis solar tracking system[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2025, 5(2): 127-142. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2025007
In this work, the enhancement of the solar cell output in a light-dependent resistor (LDR)-based dual-axis solar tracking system (DASTS) in a fixed solar panel system was quantified under different seasons and weather conditions in the city of Qingdao, China. Measurement results show that DASTS could significantly improve power generation efficiency, providing 9.9%–12.8% and 30.6%–32.8% extra daily power output over a fixed-angle system in winter and spring, respectively. It was also found that the power output of the solar panel is higher during the noon period of winter than in spring. Special attention was therefore placed on the effect of panel temperature on the solar panel photovoltaic (PV) conversion efficiency. A clear inverse relationship was observed between the two factors, with the PV conversion efficiency decreasing from 14.7% to 9.8% with an increased panel temperature from 20 to 55 ℃. It is concluded that, to achieve maximum solar cell panel power output, the panel temperature effect needs to be taken into consideration.
| [1] |
Cao J, Zhang J, Chen Y, et al. (2023) Current status, future prediction and offset potential of fossil fuel CO2 emissions in China. J Cleaner Prod 426: 139207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139207 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139207
|
| [2] |
Liu J, Ma X, Zhao B, et al. (2024) Steering toward sustainability: Can dual circulation development mitigate CO2 emissions?—Evidence from China. J Cleaner Prod 474: 143548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143548 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143548
|
| [3] |
Du D, Zhao D, Li Y, et al. (2021) Parameter calibration of the stochastic bubble population balance model for predicting NP-stabilized foam flow characteristics in porous media. Colloids Surf. A 614: 126180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126180 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126180
|
| [4] |
Li Y, Zhao D, Du D (2022) Computational study on the three phase displacement characteristics of foam fluids in porous media. J Pet Sci Eng 215: 110732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110732 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110732
|
| [5] |
Song X, Cui X, Jiang L, et al. (2022) Multi-parameter screening study on the static properties of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam near the CO2 critical point. Arabian J Chem 15: 103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103676 doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103676
|
| [6] |
Wang D, Yang M, Su X, et al. (2025) A mechanistic investigation on NP-stabilized foam three phase displacement characteristics in low permeable porous media. Geoenergy Sci Eng 245: 213526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213526 doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213526
|
| [7] |
Zang H, Yan S, Liu Z, et al. (2025) Determination of the minimum miscibility pressures of CO2 and multicomponent oil system with a novel diffusion coefficient fit line intersection methodology. Fuel 385: 134106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.134106 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.134106
|
| [8] |
Haugen M, Blaisdell-Pijuan PL, Botterud A, et al. (2024) Power market models for the clean energy transition: State of the art and future research needs. Appl Energy 357: 122495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122495 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122495
|
| [9] |
Lane K, Daouda M, Yuan A, et al. (2024) Readiness for a clean energy future: Prevalence, perceptions, and barriers to adoption of electric stoves and solar panels in New York city. Energy Policy 194: 114301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114301 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114301
|
| [10] |
Pourasl HH, Barenji RV, Khojastehnezhad VM (2023) Solar energy status in the world: A comprehensive review. Energy Rep 10: 3474–3493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.022
|
| [11] |
AL-Rousan N, Isa NAM, Desa MK M (2018) Advances in solar photovoltaic tracking systems: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 82: 2548–2569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.077 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.077
|
| [12] |
Bahrami A, Okoye C, Pourasl HH, et al. (2022) Techno-economic comparison of fixed and tracking flat plate solar collectors in the northern hemisphere. J Cleaner Prod 378: 134523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134523 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134523
|
| [13] |
Hafez AZ, Yousef AM, Harag NM (2018) Solar tracking systems: Technologies and trackers drive types–A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 91: 754–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.094 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.094
|
| [14] |
Kumba K, Upender P, Buduma P, et al. (2024) Solar tracking systems: Advancements, challenges, and future directions: A review. Energy Rep 12: 3566–3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.038 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.038
|
| [15] |
Paliyal PS, Mondal S, Layek S, et al. (2024) Automatic solar tracking system: A review pertaining to advancements and challenges in the current scenario. Clean Energy 8: 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae085 doi: 10.1093/ce/zkae085
|
| [16] |
Wang S, Shen Y, Zhou J, et al. (2022) Efficiency enhancement of tilted bifacial photovoltaic modules with horizontal single-axis tracker—The bifacial companion method. Energies 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041262 doi: 10.3390/en15041262
|
| [17] | Khandekar M, Muthyala S, Agashe S, et al. (2023) Development of an intelligent sun tracking system for solar pv panel. In: 2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobConET56651.2023.10149926 |
| [18] |
Abdul-Ghafoor QJ, Abed SH, Kadhim SA, et al. (2024) Experimental and numerical study of a linear Fresnel solar collector attached with dual axis tracking system. Results Eng 23: 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102543 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102543
|
| [19] |
Al-Amayreh MI, Alahmer A (2022) On improving the efficiency of hybrid solar lighting and thermal system using dual-axis solar tracking system. Energy Rep 8: 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.080 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.080
|
| [20] |
Kumar S, Thakur R, Lee D, et al. (2024) Impact of liquid spectrum filter and solar tracker on the overall effectiveness of a photovoltaic thermal system: An experimental investigation. Renewable Energy 226: 120390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120390 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120390
|
| [21] |
Maliani O, Bekkaoui A, Baali E, et al. (2020) Investigation on novel design of solar still coupled with two axis solar tracking system. Appl Therm Eng 172: 115144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115144 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115144
|
| [22] |
Mamodiya U, Tiwari N (2023) Dual-axis solar tracking system with different control strategies for improved energy efficiency. Comput Electr Eng 111: 108920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108920 doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108920
|
| [23] |
Fathabadi H (2016) Novel high efficient offline sensorless dual-axis solar tracker for using in photovoltaic systems and solar concentrators. Renewable Energy 95: 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.063 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.063
|
| [24] |
Sidek M, Azis N, Hasan W, et al. (2017) Automated positioning dual-axis solar tracking system with precision elevation and azimuth angle control. Energy 124: 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.001
|
| [25] |
Jamroen C, Fongkerd C, Krongpha W, et al. (2021) A novel UV sensor-based dual-axis solar tracking system: Implementation and performance analysis. Appl Energy 299: 117295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117295 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117295
|
| [26] |
Ponce-Jara MA, Velásquez-Figureueroa C, Reyes-Mero M, et al. (2022) Performance comparison between fixed and dual-axis sun-tracking photovoltaic panels with an IoT monitoring system in the coastal region of ecuador. Sustainability 14: 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031696 doi: 10.3390/su14031696
|
| [27] |
Andriamahefa MH, Bourdin V, Mininger X, et al. (2023) Control strategy for a dual-axis sun tracker based on a radiometric cube to maximize the power output of the PV system. EPJ Photovoltaics 14: 35. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2023022 doi: 10.1051/epjpv/2023022
|
| [28] |
Jaafar SS, Maarof HA, Hamasalh HB, et al. (2024) Comparative performance evaluation of dual-axis solar trackers: Enhancing solar harvesting efficiency. J Mechatron Electr Power Veh Technol 15: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.55981/j.mev.2024.808 doi: 10.55981/j.mev.2024.808
|
| [29] |
Nguyen B, Ho H (2020) Design, implementation and performance analysis of a dual axis solar tracking system. Adv Sci Technol Eng Systs 5: 41–45. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050306 doi: 10.25046/aj050306
|
| [30] |
Zhu Y, Liu J, Yang X (2020) Design and performance analysis of a solar tracking system with a novel single-axis tracking structure to maximize energy collection. Appl Energy 264: 114647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114647 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114647
|
| [31] |
Riyadi T, Effendy M, Utomo B, et al. (2023) Performance of a photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator panel in combination with various solar tracking systems. Appl Therm Eng 235: 121336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121336 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121336
|
| [32] |
Fuentes-Morales RF, Diaz-Ponce A, Peñ a-Cruz MI, et al. (2020) Control algorithms applied to active solar tracking systems: A review. Solar Energy 212: 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.071 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.071
|
| [33] |
Anshory I, Jamaaluddin J, Fahruddin A, et al. (2024) Monitoring solar heat intensity of dual axis solar tracker control system: New approach. Case Stud Therm Eng 53: 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103791 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103791
|
| [34] |
Kuttybay N, Mekhilef S, Koshkarbay N, et al. (2024) Assessment of solar tracking systems: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 68: 103879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.103879 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2024.103879
|
| [35] |
Lu W, Ajay P (2024) Solar PV tracking system using arithmetic optimization with dual axis and sensor. Meas Sens 33: 101089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101089 doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2024.101089
|
| [36] |
Vaziri Rad MA, Toopshekan A, Rahdan P, et al. (2020) A comprehensive study of techno-economic and environmental features of different solar tracking systems for residential photovoltaic installations. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 129: 109923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109923 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109923
|
| [37] |
Jamroen C, Komkum P, Kohsri S, et al. (2020) A low-cost dual-axis solar tracking system based on digital logic design: Design and implementation. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 37: 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100618 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100618
|
| [38] |
Karabiber A, Gun̈es Y (2023) Single-motor and dual-axis solar tracking system for micro photovoltaic power plants. J Solar Energy Eng Trans ASME 145: 051004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056739 doi: 10.1115/1.4056739
|
| [39] |
Song G, Han D, Li Y, et al. (2024) Enhancement of solar panel power generation performance with a passive sun tracking system. Therm Sci Eng 7: 7906. https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v7i1.7906 doi: 10.24294/tse.v7i1.7906
|
| [40] |
Cuce E, Cuce PM, Bali T (2013) An experimental analysis of illumination intensity and temperature dependency of photovoltaic cell parameters. Appl Energy 111: 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.025 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.025
|
| [41] |
Gindi O, Fradkin Z, Itzhak A, et al. (2023) Lowering the temperature and increasing the fill factor of silicon solar cells by filtering of sub-bandgap wavelengths. Energies 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155631 doi: 10.3390/en16155631
|
| [42] |
Hassan S, Omer M, Mofdal M (2025) Determining the Efficiency of Solar Cells at Different Temperatures. J Power Energy Eng 13: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2025.134003 doi: 10.4236/jpee.2025.134003
|
| [43] |
Karmani Y, Bilal M, Salman M, et al. (2025) Correlation between trap-assisted non-radiative recombination losses and thermal agitation in SnS-based solar cell: A state-of-the-art computational analysis. Mater Sci Eng B 321: 118484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118484 doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118484
|
| [44] |
Shaker L, Al-Amiery A, Hanoon M, et al. (2024) Examining the influence of thermal effects on solar cells: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy Res 11: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-024-00100-8 doi: 10.1186/s40807-024-00100-8
|
| [45] |
Si X, Shi W, Wang R, et al. (2024) Suppressing non-radiative recombination and tuning morphology via central core asymmetric substitution for efficient organic solar cells. Nano Energy 131: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110204 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110204
|
| [46] |
Ahmad N, Khandakar A, El-Tayeb A, et al. (2018) Novel design for thermal management of PV cells in harsh environmental conditions. Energies 11: 3231. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113231 doi: 10.3390/en11113231
|
| [47] |
Rubaiee S, Fazal MA (2022) The influence of various solar radiations on the efficiency of a photovoltaic solar module integrated with a passive cooling system. Energies 15: 9584. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249584 doi: 10.3390/en15249584
|
| [48] |
Basem A, Mukhtar A, Elbarbary ZMS, et al. (2024) Experimental study on the various varieties of photovoltaic panels (PVs) cooling systems to increase their electrical efficiency. PLoS One 19: e0307616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307616 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307616
|
| [49] |
Hamed MH, Hassan H, Ookawara S, et al. (2024) Performance comparative study on passively cooled concentrated photovoltaic (PV) using adsorption/desorption and heat sink cooling methods: Experimental investigations. Energy 307: 132700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132700 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132700
|
| [50] |
Ahmed YE, Maghami MR, Pasupuleti J, et al. (2024) Overview of recent solar photovoltaic cooling system approach. Technologies 12: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12090171 doi: 10.3390/technologies12090171
|