This study aimed to explore consumer perceptions and acceptance of potential 3D-printed accessories made from used face masks. Based on the principles of the circular economy, a proposed conceptual framework was developed to determine the role of experiential value in the relationship between product design perception and perceived purchase intention. Data were collected through a web-based survey questionnaire, employing a nationwide convenience sample of consumers via crowdsourcing marketplaces. Among the 899 respondents, 470 were female, and 429 were male, with an average age of 38. A structural equation model was used to test the hypotheses in the proposed conceptual framework. The findings indicated that consumer experience plays a crucial role in significantly enhancing purchase intentions for 3D-printed accessories made from used face masks. Participants identified jewelry, electronic cases, and home decor items (e.g., picture frames) as the top three preferred product categories for 3D printing. Usability, social value, and environmental concerns emerged as the most influential components of consumer experience in driving purchase intentions for 3D-printed accessories. Additionally, the study confirmed the mediating role of consumer experience between design perception and purchase intention. These findings provide opportunities to rethink, redesign, and reimagine environmentally responsible, socially inclusive, and economically viable practices. The development of new 3D printing filaments using recycled plastic-based materials further aligned with 3D-printed accessories. Finally, this study offers a critical bridge between academia and industry, paving the way for a sustainable future through innovation in design and manufacturing.
Citation: Changhyun (Lyon) Nam. Case study of potential design perceptions for 3D printed accessories made of used face masks[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2025, 5(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2025001
This study aimed to explore consumer perceptions and acceptance of potential 3D-printed accessories made from used face masks. Based on the principles of the circular economy, a proposed conceptual framework was developed to determine the role of experiential value in the relationship between product design perception and perceived purchase intention. Data were collected through a web-based survey questionnaire, employing a nationwide convenience sample of consumers via crowdsourcing marketplaces. Among the 899 respondents, 470 were female, and 429 were male, with an average age of 38. A structural equation model was used to test the hypotheses in the proposed conceptual framework. The findings indicated that consumer experience plays a crucial role in significantly enhancing purchase intentions for 3D-printed accessories made from used face masks. Participants identified jewelry, electronic cases, and home decor items (e.g., picture frames) as the top three preferred product categories for 3D printing. Usability, social value, and environmental concerns emerged as the most influential components of consumer experience in driving purchase intentions for 3D-printed accessories. Additionally, the study confirmed the mediating role of consumer experience between design perception and purchase intention. These findings provide opportunities to rethink, redesign, and reimagine environmentally responsible, socially inclusive, and economically viable practices. The development of new 3D printing filaments using recycled plastic-based materials further aligned with 3D-printed accessories. Finally, this study offers a critical bridge between academia and industry, paving the way for a sustainable future through innovation in design and manufacturing.
| [1] |
Yu DG, Li Q, Song W, et al. (2023) Advanced technique-based combination of innovation education and safety education in higher education. J Chem Edu 100: 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00568 doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00568
|
| [2] | Zoting S (2024) 3D printing market size, share, and trends 2024 to 2023. Preced Res. Available from: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/3d-printing-market. |
| [3] | Schwaar C (2023) 3D Printing meets the billion-dollar footwear industry. Forbes. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolynschwaar/2023/07/19/3d-printing-meets-the-billion-dollar-footwear-industry/. |
| [4] | Listek V (2024) 10 Stunning pieces of 3D printed fashion defining the 21st century. 3D print.com. Available from: https://3dprint.com/307467/10-stunning-pieces-of-3d-printed-fashion-defining-the-21st-century/. |
| [5] | Malloy V, Johnson AD (2024) How Brazil recycling co-ops are helping turn plastic waste into shoes. Time. Available from: https://time.com/7198461/brazil-recycling-co-ops-helping-turn-plastic-waste-into-shoes-veja/. |
| [6] | Filament properties table. Simplify 3D®. Available from: https://www.simplify3d.com/resources/materials-guide/properties-table/. |
| [7] | Rajabi-Kafshgar A, Seyedi I, Tirkolaee EB (2024) Circular closed-loop supply chain network design considering 3D printing and PET bottle waste. Environ Dev Sustainability, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04767-3 |
| [8] | Moore C (2025) Plastic pollution. Britannica. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/science/plastic-pollution. |
| [9] | Lu M (2021) 1.6 billion disposable masks entered our oceans in 2020. Available from: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/1-6-billion-disposable-masks-entered-our-oceans-in-2020/. |
| [10] | Trafton A (2021) The environmental toll of disposable masks. Available from: https://news.mit.edu/2021/covid-masks-environment-0720. |
| [11] |
Meng Y, Bari MW (2019) Design perceptions for 3D printed accessories of digital devices and consumer-based brand equity. Front Psychol 10: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02800 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02800
|
| [12] |
Jawahir IS, Bradley R (2016) Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Proc CIRP 40: 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067
|
| [13] |
Kaur G, Uisan K, Ong KL, et al. (2018) Recent trends in green and sustainable chemistry & waste valorisation: Rethinking plastics in a circular economy. Curr Opin Gre Sustainable Chem 9: 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.11.003
|
| [14] |
Mikula K, Skrzypczak D, Izydorczyk G, et al. (2021) 3D printing filament as a second life of waste plastics—A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 12321–12333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10657-8 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10657-8
|
| [15] | United Nations (2015) Department of economic and social Affairs: Sustainable development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. |
| [16] | Jhinkwan A, Kalsi S, Pankaj P (2023) An overview on 3D metal printing technology in automobile industry. In: AIP Conference Proc, 2558. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120028 |
| [17] | Prabhu L, Krishnamoorthi S, Joseph J, et al. (2023) Development of advanced 3D printing technology in automotive industry. In: AIP Confer Proc, 2523. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110513 |
| [18] |
Hossain KR, Shishir MMA, Rashid S, et al. (2023) Application of 3D printing technology in the military. J Chemistry Letters 4: 103–116. https://doi.org/10.22034/jchemlett.2023.395069.1113 doi: 10.22034/jchemlett.2023.395069.1113
|
| [19] | Marciniak M (2023) The 3D printing in military applications: FDM technology, materials, and implications. Adv Military Technol 18: 241–257. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-9205 |
| [20] | Datta S, Barua R (2024) 3D printing in modern healthcare: an overview of materials, methods, applications, and challenges. Emerging Technol Health Literacy Medical Practice, 132–152. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1214-8.ch007 |
| [21] |
Tasneem I, Ariz A, Bharti D, et al. (2023) 3D printing technology and its significant applications in the context of healthcare education. J Industrial Integration Manage 8: 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862221500159 doi: 10.1142/S2424862221500159
|
| [22] |
Özeren Ö, Özeren EB, Top SM, et al. (2023) Learning-by-Doing using 3D printers: Digital fabrication studio experience in architectural education. J Eng Res 11: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100135 doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.100135
|
| [23] |
Sun Z, Wong YH, Yeong CH (2023) Patient-specific 3D-printed low-cost models in medical education and clinical practice. Micromachines 14: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020464 doi: 10.3390/mi14020464
|
| [24] |
To TT, Al Mahmud A, Ranscombe C (2023) Teaching sustainability using 3D printing in engineering education: An observational study. Sustainability 15: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097470 doi: 10.3390/su15097470
|
| [25] |
Lyu J, Hahn K, Lee HJ (2023) Potential determinants of consumers' intention to purchase 3D printed fashion products. Inter J Retail Distribution Manage 51: 1027–1044. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-09-2021-0437 doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-09-2021-0437
|
| [26] | Ma T, Ma W, Liu W (2024) The application of carving technique based on 3D printing digitalization technology in jewelry design. Int J Interactive Design Manufacturing, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01730-w |
| [27] |
Tufan Tolmaç N, İşmal ÖE (2023) A new era: 3D printing as an aesthetic language and creative tool in fashion and textile design. Res J Textile Apparel 28: 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-05-2022-0058 doi: 10.1108/RJTA-05-2022-0058
|
| [28] | Yang L, Meng J, Xue T, et al. (2024) Application of 3D printing cellulose fabrics based on cotton fibers in the textile and fashion industry. Additive Manuf, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104000 |
| [29] |
Zhao J, Yang Y, Kobir M, et al. (2024) Driving additive manufacturing towards circular economy: State-of-the-art and future research directions. J Manuf Proc 124: 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.018
|
| [30] |
Kechagias JD (2022) Materials for additive manufacturing. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 785–790. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2022048 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022048
|
| [31] |
Ghabezi P, Sam-Daliri O, Flanagan T, et al. (2024) Circular economy innovation: A deep investigation on 3D printing of industrial waste polypropylene and carbon fibre composites. Res Conserv Recycl 206: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107667 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107667
|
| [32] | Tabary SAAB, Fayazfar HR (2024) Circular economy solutions for plastic waste: Improving rheological properties of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (r-PET) for direct 3D printing. Progress Additive Manuf, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00784-w |
| [33] |
Saxena P, Stavropoulos P, Kechagias J, et al. (2020) Sustainability assessment for manufacturing operations. Energies 13: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112730 doi: 10.3390/en13112730
|
| [34] |
Kechagias JD, Chaidas D, Spahiu T (2024) Decorative 3D printing on textiles using elastomer TPU filament under different printing conditions. Rapid Prototyping J 30: 2033–2042. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0106 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0106
|
| [35] |
Nam C, Chung H, Ridgway JL (2022) New filaments from used face masks as PLA filament alternative for 3D printing: Part I. Int Textile Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings 79: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.15878 doi: 10.31274/itaa.15878
|
| [36] |
Nam C, Chung H, Ridgway JL (2023) Evaluation of new filaments from used disposable face masks in the 3D Printing industry: Part Ⅱ. Int Textile Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings 80: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.17074 doi: 10.31274/itaa.17074
|
| [37] |
Amaral AR, Rodrigues E, Gaspar AR, et al. (2020) A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. J Cleaner Product 250: 119558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137270 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137270
|
| [38] |
Mishra A, Dash S, Malhotra NK (2015) An integrated framework for design perception and brand equity. AMS Rev 5: 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0063-y doi: 10.1007/s13162-015-0063-y
|
| [39] |
Sheng ML, Teo TS (2012) Product attributes and brand equity in the mobile domain: The mediating role of customer experience. Int J Inf Manage 32: 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.017
|
| [40] |
Suki NM (2016) Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: Structural effects of consumption values. J Cleaner Product 132: 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.087 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.087
|
| [41] |
Yadav R, Pathak GS (2017) Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol Econ 134: 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019
|
| [42] |
Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J Mark 59: 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900302 doi: 10.1177/002224299505900302
|
| [43] | Fiksel JR (2009) Design for environment: A guide to sustainable product development. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [44] | Brunner RJ, Emery S, Hall R (2008) Do you matter? How great design will make people love your company. New Jersey: FT Press. |
| [45] |
Cui T, Chattaraman V, Sun L (2022) Examining consumers' perceptions of a 3D printing integrated apparel: A functional, expressive and aesthetic (FEA) perspective. J Fash Mar Man 26: 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2021-0036 doi: 10.1108/JFMM-02-2021-0036
|
| [46] |
Nawar SH, Etawy MS, Nassar GE, et al. (2024) The impact of CMF design on product design. J Textiles, Colorat Polymer Sci 21: 259–272. https://doi.org/10.21608/JTCPS.2024.258196.1250 doi: 10.21608/JTCPS.2024.258196.1250
|
| [47] |
Kermavnar T, Shannon A, O'Sullivan LW (2021) The application of additive manufacturing/3D printing in ergonomic aspects of product design: A systematic review. Appl Ergonomics 97: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528
|
| [48] | Dunston P, Wang X, Billinghurst M, et al. (2003) Mixed reality benefits for design perception. Nist Special Publication SP, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2002/0030 |
| [49] |
Bakhshian S, Lee YA (2022) Social acceptability and product attributes of smart apparel: Their effects on consumers' attitude and use intention. J Textile Institute 113: 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2021.1898138 doi: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1898138
|
| [50] |
Shi A, Huo F, Hou G (2021) Effects of design aesthetics on the perceived value of a product. Front Psychol 12: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670800 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670800
|
| [51] |
Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991) Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. J Business Res 22: 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
|
| [52] | Cătoiu I, Vrânceanu DM, Filip A (2010) Setting fair prices—Fundamental principle of sustainable marketing. Amfiteatru Eco J 12: 115–128. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/168690. |
| [53] |
Diaz A, Schöggl JP, Reyes T, et al. (2021) Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management. Sustainable Prod Cons 26: 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044
|
| [54] |
Wijekoon R, Sabri MF (2021) Determinants that influence green product purchase intention and behavior: A literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability 13: 6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116219 doi: 10.3390/su13116219
|
| [55] |
Biswas A, Roy M (2015) Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. J Cleaner Product 87: 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075
|
| [56] |
Mishra A (2016) Attribute-based design perceptions and consumer-brand relationship: Role of user expertise. J Business Rese 69: 5983–5992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.012
|
| [57] |
McDonagh D, Bruseberg A, Haslam C (2002) Visual product evaluation: Exploring users' emotional relationships with products. Appl Ergo 33: 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00008-X doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00008-X
|
| [58] | Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. |
| [59] |
Stojanov J, Malobabic M, Stanojevic G, et al. (2021) Quality of sleep and health-related quality of life among health care professionals treating patients with coronavirus disease-19. Inter J Soc Psych 67: 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020942800 doi: 10.1177/0020764020942800
|
| [60] |
Cowan K, Kinley T (2014) Green spirit: Consumer empathies for green apparel. Int J Consumer Studies 38: 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12125 doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12125
|
| [61] |
Hwang JA, Park Y, Kim Y (2016) Why do consumers respond to eco-labels? The case of Korea. SpringerPlus 5: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3550-1 doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3550-1
|
| [62] |
Cachero-Martínez S (2020) Consumer behaviour towards organic products: The moderating role of environmental concern. J Risk Fina Manage 13: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120330 doi: 10.3390/jrfm13120330
|
| [63] |
He B, Li F, Cao X, et al. (2020) Product sustainable design: A review from the environmental, economic, and social aspects. J Comp Inf Sci Eng 20: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045408 doi: 10.1115/1.4045408
|
| [64] |
Rausch TM, Kopplin CS (2021) Bridge the gap: Consumers' purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. J Cleaner Product 278: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882
|
| [65] |
Colorado HA, Velásquez EIG, Monteiro SN (2020) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: The circular economy of materials and environmental perspectives. J Materials Res Technol 9: 8221–8234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.062 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.062
|
| [66] |
Lekeckas K, Stirbe J, Ancutiene K, et al. (2023) Testing of 3D printing on textile fabrics for garments application within circular design. Int J Clothing Sci Technol 35: 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-06-2022-0080 doi: 10.1108/IJCST-06-2022-0080
|
| [67] |
Spahiu T, Canaj E, Shehi E (2020) 3D printing for clothing production. J Eng Fibers Fabrics 15: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558925020948216 doi: 10.1177/1558925020948216
|
| [68] |
Mavri M, Fronimaki E, Kadrefi A (2023) Survey analysis for the adoption of 3D printing technology: Consumers' perspective. J Sci Tech Policy Man 14: 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0023 doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0023
|
| [69] | Rossi E, Di Nicolantonio M, Barcarolo P, et al. (2020) Sustainable 3D printing: Design opportunities and research perspectives. In: Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E., Alexander, T. (eds), Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping 975: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20216-3_1 |
| [70] | Brooke J (1996) SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 1–7. |
| [71] |
Sweeney JC, Soutar GN (2001) Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J Retailing 77: 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0 doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
|
| [72] |
Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Com Assoc Inf Syst 4: 1–79. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407 doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.00407
|
| [73] |
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
|
| [74] |
Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC (2006) The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Res Meth 9: 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919 doi: 10.1177/1094428105284919
|
| [75] |
Taber KS (2018) The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res in Scie Educa 48: 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
|
| [76] |
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, et al. (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Academy Marketing Sci 40: 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
|
| [77] |
Huysman S, Debaveye S, Schaubroeck T, et al. (2015) The recyclability benefit rate of closed-loop and open-loop systems: A case study on plastic recycling in Flanders. Resour Cons Recyc 101: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.014
|
| [78] | Payne A (2015) Open-and closed-loop recycling of textile and apparel products. In: Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00006-X |
Figures(5) / Tables(2)
Changhyun (Lyon) Nam. Case study of potential design perceptions for 3D printed accessories made of used face masks[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2025, 5(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2025001
DownLoad: