Cryo electron tomography (cryo-ET) enables three-dimensional visualization of biological macromolecules in their near-native environments, bridging the gap between structural and cellular biology. In this study, we evaluated high-resolution subtomogram averaging (STA) using a cryo-TEM (CRYO ARM™ 300 II, JEOL) and PACEtomo software system for both single-particle analysis (SPA) type grids and lamellae prepared by cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling (JIB-4700F, JEOL). Using mouse apoferritin and E. coli ribosomes in thin vitreous ice film, resolutions of 2.04 Å and 2.86 Å were achieved, respectively. Using cryo-FIB lamellae of Salmonella cells, in situ ribosome structures were resolved to 8.2 Å resolution.
Citation: Fumiaki Makino, Haruaki Yanagisawa, Fabian Eisenstein, Tomoko Miyata, Miki Kinoshita, Masahide Kikkawa, Keiichi Namba. Subtomogram averaging by cryo electron tomography using CRYO ARM™ 300 II for purified and cellular samples[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2026, 13(2): 131-142. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2026008
Cryo electron tomography (cryo-ET) enables three-dimensional visualization of biological macromolecules in their near-native environments, bridging the gap between structural and cellular biology. In this study, we evaluated high-resolution subtomogram averaging (STA) using a cryo-TEM (CRYO ARM™ 300 II, JEOL) and PACEtomo software system for both single-particle analysis (SPA) type grids and lamellae prepared by cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling (JIB-4700F, JEOL). Using mouse apoferritin and E. coli ribosomes in thin vitreous ice film, resolutions of 2.04 Å and 2.86 Å were achieved, respectively. Using cryo-FIB lamellae of Salmonella cells, in situ ribosome structures were resolved to 8.2 Å resolution.
| [1] |
Schur FKM (2019) Toward high-resolution in situ structural biology with cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. Curr Opin Struct Biol 58: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2019.03.018
|
| [2] |
Obr M, Hagen WJH, Dick RA, et al. (2022) Exploring high-resolution cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging capabilities of contemporary DEDs. J Struct Biol 214: 107826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107852
|
| [3] |
Marko M, Hsieh C, Schalek R, et al. (2007) Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 4: 215-217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1014
|
| [4] | Koning RI, Koster AJ, Sharp TH (2018) Advances in cryo-electron tomography for biology and medicine. Curr Opin Struct Biol 52: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.02.007 |
| [5] |
Danev R, Yanagisawa H, Kikkawa M (2021) Cryo-EM performance testing of hardware and data acquisition strategies. Microscopy 70: 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfab016
|
| [6] |
Eisenstein F, Danev R, Pilhofer M (2022) Parallel cryo-electron tomography on in situ lamellae. Nat Methods 19: 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01690-1
|
| [7] |
Tegunov D, Cramer P (2019) Real-time cryo-EM data preprocessing with warp. Nat Methods 16: 1146-1152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0580-y
|
| [8] |
Burt A, Zivanov J, Hagen WJH, et al. (2024) An image processing pipeline for electron cryo-tomography in RELION-5. FEBS Open Bio 14: 1788-1804. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13967
|
| [9] | Chaillet ML, Roet S, Veltkamp RC, et al. (2025) Pytom-match-pick: a tophat-transform constraint for automated classification in template matching. J Struct Biol X 11: 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjsbx.2025.100125 |
| [10] |
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. (2021) UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci 30: 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3943
|
| [11] | Zheng S, Wolff G, Greenan G, et al. (2022) AreTomo: an integrated software package for automated marker-free, motion-corrected cryo-electron tomographic alignment and reconstruction. J Struct Biol X 6: 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjsbx.2022.100068 |
| [12] |
Zheng S, Palovcak E, Armache JP, et al. (2017) MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14: 331-332. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4193
|
| [13] | Bui KH (2022) Builab/subtomo2Chimera v0.12 (0.12). Zenodo . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6820119 |
| [14] |
Eisenstein F, Danev R, Pilhofer M (2019) Improved applicability and robustness of fast cryo-electron tomography data acquisition. J Struct Biol 208: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2019.08.006
|
| [15] |
Chreifi G, Chen S, Metskas LA, et al. (2019) Rapid tilt-series acquisition for electron cryotomography. J Struct Biol 205: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2018.12.008
|
| [16] |
Obr M, Hagen WJH, Dick RA, et al. (2022) Exploring high-resolution cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging capabilities of contemporary DEDs. J Struct Biol 214: 107852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107852
|
| [17] |
Ni T, Frosio T, Mendonça L, et al. (2022) High-resolution in situ structure determination by cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging using emClarity. Nat Protoc 17: 421-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00648-5
|
| [18] |
Lucas BA, Grigorieff N (2023) Quantification of gallium cryo-FIB milling damage in biological lamellae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120: e2301852120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301852120
|
biophy-13-02-008-s001.pdf |
![]() |