Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Napier grass and sugarcane top silages and their application for silage preparation

Huade Xie; Fanquan Zeng; Xianqing Luo; Li Liang; Jingzhen Li; Lijuan Peng; Chengjian Yang; Huade Xie; Fanquan Zeng; Xianqing Luo; Li Liang; Jingzhen Li; Lijuan Peng; Chengjian Yang

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2026008

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2026, Volume 11, Issue 1: 137-152. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2026008

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Napier grass and sugarcane top silages and their application for silage preparation

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China

Received: 23 December 2025 Revised: 03 March 2026 Accepted: 10 March 2026 Published: 17 March 2026

In this study, we aimed to isolate and characterize lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from mixed Napier grass (NG) and sugarcane top (ST) silages, and to evaluate their effects on silage quality as alternative LAB inoculants. Among the 370 LAB strains isolated from silage and screened for tolerance to pH 3.7, we identified 17 strains with distinct colony shapes and sources. Strains XH146 and XH352 exhibited the strongest ability to produce acid in Man Rogosa Sharpe broth and were identified as Lactiplantibacillus paracasei and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, respectively. Strains XH146 (LAB1), XH352 (LAB2), and L. plantarum Chikuso-1 (FG, a commercial inoculant) were used as additives for NG and ST silage preparation. All inoculated silages were better preserved than the control. LAB addition significantly reduced the pH of NG silage, with the lowest pH and the highest lactic acid content found in the combined LAB1 + LAB2 treatment. NH3-N contents decreased in the following order: Control > LAB1 > LAB2 > FG > LAB1 + LAB2. In conclusion, L. paracasei XH146 and L. plantarum XH352 demonstrated the highest ability to enhance silage quality, making them promising candidates for silage inoculants.
- identification,
- lactic acid bacteria,
- Napier grass,
- sugarcane top,
- silage inoculant
Citation: Huade Xie, Fanquan Zeng, Xianqing Luo, Li Liang, Jingzhen Li, Lijuan Peng, Chengjian Yang. Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Napier grass and sugarcane top silages and their application for silage preparation[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2026, 11(1): 137-152. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2026008

Related Papers:

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to isolate and characterize lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from mixed Napier grass (NG) and sugarcane top (ST) silages, and to evaluate their effects on silage quality as alternative LAB inoculants. Among the 370 LAB strains isolated from silage and screened for tolerance to pH 3.7, we identified 17 strains with distinct colony shapes and sources. Strains XH146 and XH352 exhibited the strongest ability to produce acid in Man Rogosa Sharpe broth and were identified as Lactiplantibacillus paracasei and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, respectively. Strains XH146 (LAB1), XH352 (LAB2), and L. plantarum Chikuso-1 (FG, a commercial inoculant) were used as additives for NG and ST silage preparation. All inoculated silages were better preserved than the control. LAB addition significantly reduced the pH of NG silage, with the lowest pH and the highest lactic acid content found in the combined LAB1 + LAB2 treatment. NH3-N contents decreased in the following order: Control > LAB1 > LAB2 > FG > LAB1 + LAB2. In conclusion, L. paracasei XH146 and L. plantarum XH352 demonstrated the highest ability to enhance silage quality, making them promising candidates for silage inoculants.

References

[1]	Wilkinson JM, Bolsen KK, Lin CJ (2003) History of silage. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology, 42: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c1
[2]	Savoie P, Jofriet JC (2003) Silage storage. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology, 42: 405–467. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c9
[3]	Kung L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, et al. (2018) Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci 101: 4020–4033. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909 doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13909
[4]	Okoye CO, Wang Y, Gao L, et al. (2023) The performance of lactic acid bacteria in silage production: A review of modern biotechnology for silage improvement. Microbiol Res 266: 127212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127212 doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127212
[5]	Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, et al. (2003) Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology, 42: 31–93. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2
[6]	Kung L, Stokes MR, Lin CJ (2003) Silage additives. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology, 42: 305–360. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c7
[7]	Ma J, Fan X, Ma Z, et al. (2023) Silage additives improve fermentation quality, aerobic stability and rumen degradation in mixed silage composed of amaranth and corn straw. Front Plant Sci 14: 1189747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1189747 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1189747
[8]	Yuliana T, Pratiwi AR, Zahratunnisa S, et al. (2023) Purification and partial characterization of a bacteriocin produced by lactobacillus pentosus 124-2 isolated from Dadih. Appl Sci 13: 4277. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074277 doi: 10.3390/app13074277
[9]	Srivastava R, Chamadia B, Behare PV, et al. (2025) Characterization and probiotic potential of thermotolerant lactic acid bacteria from silage for ensiling crop residues. AMB Express 15: 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-025-01941-2 doi: 10.1186/s13568-025-01941-2
[10]	Su R, Ke W, Usman S, et al. (2023) Dry matter content and inoculant alter the metabolome and bacterial community of alfalfa ensiled at high temperature. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107: 3443–3457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12535-y doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12535-y
[11]	Pholsen S, Khota W, Pang H, et al. (2016) Characterization and application of lactic acid bacteria for tropical silage preparation. Anim Sci J 87: 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12534 doi: 10.1111/asj.12534
[12]	Xie H, Zeng F, Luo X, et al. (2024) Silage making of Napier grass and sugarcane top at different proportions: Evolution of natural fermentation characteristics, chemical composition, and microbiological profile. Fermentation 10: 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10100525 doi: 10.3390/fermentation10100525
[13]	Zhao G, Wu H, Li L, et al. (2021) Effects of applying cellulase and starch on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) silage. J Anim Sci Technol 63: 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e107 doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e107
[14]	Islam MR, Garcia SC, Sarker NR, et al. (2023) Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) management strategies for dairy and meat production in the tropics and subtropics: Yield and nutritive value. Front Plant Sci 14: 1269976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1269976 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1269976
[15]	Sánchez-Guerra NA, Gonzalez-Ronquillo M, Anderson RC, et al. (2024) Improvements in fermentation and nutritive quality of elephant grass [Cenchrus purpureus (Schumach.) Morrone] silages: A review. Trop Anim Health Prod 56: 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04027-6 doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04027-6
[16]	Ferreira DdJ, Lana RdP, Zanine AdM, et al. (2013) Silage fermentation and chemical composition of elephant grass inoculated with rumen strains of Streptococcus bovis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 183: 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.020 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.020
[17]	Li H, Ran Q, Jia Z, et al. (2023) Effect of different dry matter content on fermentation characteristics and nutritional quality of Napier grass silage with novel lactic acid bacteria strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 76: ovad018. https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovad018 doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovad018
[18]	Yang H, Wang T, Yu X, et al. (2020) Enhanced sugar accumulation and regulated plant hormone signalling genes contribute to cold tolerance in hypoploid Saccharum spontaneum. BMC Genomics 21: 507. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06917-z doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06917-z
[19]	NBS (2024) China Statistical Yearbook, China Statistics Press, National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing, 12th, edn.
[20]	Xie H, Peng L, Li M, et al. (2023) Effects of mixed sugarcane tops and napiergrass silages on fermentative quality, nutritional value, and milk yield in water buffaloes. Anim Sci J 94: e13824. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13824 doi: 10.1111/asj.13824
[21]	Getahun K, Ashenafi M, Getnet A, et al. (2018) Nutritional and fermentative quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) top ensiled with or without urea and molasses. Afr J Agric Res 13: 1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12888 doi: 10.5897/AJAR2017.12888
[22]	Roberto CHV, Villela SDJ, Leonel FdP, et al. (2019) Performance and economic evaluation of feedlot cattle fed sugarcane tops. Livestock Sci 230: 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103827 doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103827
[23]	Xie H, Xie F, Guo Y, et al. (2023) Fermentation quality, nutritive value and in vitro ruminal digestion of Napier grass, sugarcane top and their mixed silages prepared using lactic acid bacteria and formic acid. Grassl Sci 69: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12382 doi: 10.1111/grs.12382
[24]	Sindhu R, Gnansounou E, Binod P, et al. (2016) Bioconversion of sugarcane crop residue for value added products—An overview. Renew Energy 98: 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.057 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.057
[25]	Wang T, Teng K, Cao Y, et al. (2020) Effects of Lactobacillus hilgardii 60TS-2, with or without homofermentative Lactobacillus plantarum B90, on the aerobic stability, fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics in sugarcane top silage. Bioresour Technol 312: 123600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123600 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123600
[26]	Chauhan N, Kumari N, Mishra DB, et al. (2023) Dynamic changes in microbial succession and fermentation profiles of sugarcane tops silage treated with exogenous enzymes and lactic acid bacteria following various duration of ensiling. Sugar Tech 25: 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121315 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121315
[27]	Sun Y, Sun Q, Tang Y, et al. (2023) Integrated microbiology and metabolomic analysis reveal the improvement of rice straw silage quality by inoculation of Lactobacillus brevis. Biotechnol Biof Biop 16: 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-023-02431-y doi: 10.1186/s13068-023-02431-y
[28]	Cai Y, Kumai S, Ogawa M, et al. (1999) Characterization and identification of Pediococcus species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 2901–2906. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.7.2901-2906.1999 doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.7.2901-2906.1999
[29]	AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Arlington, VA, 15th edn.
[30]	Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
[31]	Udén P (2006) In vitro studies on microbial efficiency from two cuts of ryegrass (Lolium perenne, cv. Aberdart) with different proportions of sugars and protein. Anim Feed Sci Technol 126: 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.008
[32]	Byrne E, McCormack S (2008) Determination of ammonium nitrogen in silage samples by an ammonia electrode. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 9: 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627409366480 doi: 10.1080/00103627409366480
[33]	Saarisalo E, Skyttä E, Haikara A, et al. (2007) Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass. J Appl Microbiol 102: 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03103.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03103.x
[34]	Lin C, Bolsen KK, Brent BE, et al. (1992) Epiphytic microflora on alfalfa and whole-plant corn. J Dairy Sci 75: 2484–2493. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78010-2 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78010-2
[35]	Lin C, Brent BE, Bolsen KK et al. (2017) Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre‐ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and maize. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, 0: 113–119.
[36]	Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, et al. (1999) Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J Dairy Sci 82: 520–526. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X
[37]	Rohmatus S, Ridwan R, Astuti WD, et al. (2024) Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Silage Inoculant Candidate. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1377: 012082.
[38]	Nikodinoska I, Wambacq E, Landschoot S, et al. (2024) Lactic acid bacteria and manganese‐based additives for improved lucerne, perennial grass, and perennial grass‐white clover preservation as silage. Grass Forage Sci 78: 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12668 doi: 10.1111/gfs.12668
[39]	Lynch KM, Zannini E, Coffey A, et al. (2018) Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides in foods and beverages: Isolation, properties, characterization, and health benefits. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 9: 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012537 doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012537
[40]	El Boujamaai M, Mannani N, Aloui A, et al. (2023) Biodiversity and biotechnological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Moroccan sourdoughs. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39: 331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03784-0 doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03784-0
[41]	Ali N, Wang S, Zhao J, et al. (2021) Using a high-throughput sequencing technology to evaluate the various forage source epiphytic microbiota and their effect on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of Napier grass. Arch Microbiol 203: 4879–4890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02296-5 doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02296-5
[42]	Nami Y, Panahi B, Jalaly HM, et al. (2024) Probiotic characterization of LAB isolated from sourdough and different traditional dairy products using biochemical, molecular and computational approaches. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 17: 1014–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10234-2 doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10234-2
[43]	Woolford MK, Sawczyc MK (1984) An investigation into the effect of cultures of lactic acid bacteria on fermentation in silage. Grass Forage Sci 39: 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01675.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01675.x
[44]	Yin X, Wu J, Shen L, et al. (2024) Additives improve the fermentation quality, anthocyanin content, and biological activity of purple Napier grass silage. J Sci Food Agric 105: 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13903 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13903
[45]	Mishra DB, Tyagi N (2024) Silage additives. In: Mahesh MS, Yata VK (Eds.), Feed Additives and Supplements for Ruminants, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 449–458.
[46]	Torres RNS, Ghedini CP, Coelho LM, et al. (2021) Meta-analysis of the effects of silage additives on high-moisture grain silage quality and performance of dairy cows. Livestock Sci 251: 104618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104618 doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104618
[47]	Oliveira AS, Weinberg ZG, Ogunade IM, et al. (2017) Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 100: 4587–4603. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11815 doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11815
[48]	Dong M, Li Q, Xu F, et al. (2020) Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of sweet sorghum bagasse silage. Sci Rep 10: 837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57628-0 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57628-0
[49]	Cherney JH, Cherney DJR (2003) Assessing Silage Quality. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology, 42: 141–198. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c4
[50]	Mitiku AA, Andeta AF, Borremans A, et al. (2020) Silage making of maize stover and banana pseudostem under South Ethiopian conditions: evolution of pH, dry matter and microbiological profile. Microb Biotechnol 13: 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13626 doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13626
[51]	Jaipolsaen N, Sangsritavong S, Uengwetwanit T, et al. (2022) Comparison of the effects of microbial inoculants on fermentation quality and microbiota in Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and corn (Zea mays L.) silage. Front Microbiol 12: 784535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.784535 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.784535
[52]	Li F, Zhang B, Zhang Y, et al. (2022) Probiotic effect of ferulic acid esterase-producing Lactobacillus plantarum inoculated alfalfa silage on digestion, antioxidant, and immunity status of lactating dairy goats. Anim Nutr 11: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2022.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.06.010
[53]	Weinberg ZG, Shatz O, Chen Y, et al. (2007) Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages. J Dairy Sci 90: 4754–4762. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0176 doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0176
[54]	Liu B, Strauber H, Saraiva J, et al. (2022) Machine learning-assisted identification of bioindicators predicts medium-chain carboxylate production performance of an anaerobic mixed culture. Microbiome 10: 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01219-2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01219-2
[55]	Ni K, Zhao J, Zhu B, et al. (2018) Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum. Biores Technol 265: 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097
[56]	Broberg A, Jacobsson K, Strom K, et al. (2007) Metabolite profiles of lactic acid bacteria in grass silage. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5547–5552. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02939-06 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02939-06
[57]	Bai B, Qiu R, Sun L, et al. (2024) Effect isolated lactic acid bacteria inoculation on the quality, bacterial composition and metabolic characterization of Caragana korshinskii silage. Chem Biol Technol Agric 11: 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-024-00591-z doi: 10.1186/s40538-024-00591-z
[58]	Costa DM, Carvalho BF, Bernardes TF, et al. (2021) New epiphytic strains of lactic acid bacteria improve the conservation of corn silage harvested at late maturity. Anim Feed Sci Technol 274: 114852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114852 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114852
[59]	You S, Du S, Ge G, et al. (2021) Selection of lactic acid bacteria from native grass silage and its effects as inoculant on silage fermentation. Agron J 113: 3169–3177. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20720 doi: 10.1002/agj2.20720
[60]	Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, et al. (2018) Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci 101: 3980–4000. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839 doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13839

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)