Challenges and opportunities of sustainability, certifications and traceability in the Italian beekeeping sector

Giulia Mastromonaco; Simone Blanc; Antonina Sparacino; Chiara Medoro; Stefano Predieri; Marta Cianciabella; Giulia Mastromonaco; Simone Blanc; Antonina Sparacino; Chiara Medoro; Stefano Predieri; Marta Cianciabella

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2025016

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2025, Volume 10, Issue 2: 314-336. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025016

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Challenges and opportunities of sustainability, certifications and traceability in the Italian beekeeping sector

1.
Department of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy
2.
Institute for Bioeconomy (IBE), Italian National Research Council, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy

Received: 22 January 2025 Revised: 23 March 2025 Accepted: 29 April 2025 Published: 14 May 2025

The impact of beekeeping on agricultural activity is significant in environmental and economic terms, supporting biodiversity through pollination and contributing to rural livelihoods. However, in recent years, this activity has been increasingly threatened by climate change, competition from imported products, and widespread honey fraud, which undermine the sector's sustainability and profitability. This study explores the perceptions of Italian beekeepers and their associations with sustainability, certification, and traceability in the sector. The aim was to identify the challenges and the opportunities for the Italian beekeeping sector in sustainability, traceability, and certification. To this end, two types of analysis were applied to combine the results of the focus groups with three association/consortia and a survey of 360 beekeepers. Through this combination, the research highlights the challenges facing the sector, particularly those related to climate change and biodiversity loss. Associations emphasized the critical role of technical support and legislative measures in promoting sustainable practices, including improved regulation of hive products imports and combating honey fraud. Beekeepers showed strong awareness of their environmental and social role, particularly in pollination and biodiversity conservation, but less engagement with broader systemic issues such as certified production and climate change mitigation. Amateur beekeepers showed greater sensitivity to sustainability issues than professionals. The findings highlight the importance of collaboration between associations, policy makers and stakeholders to address immediate operational needs and promote long-term sustainability in the beekeeping sector.
- focus group,
- SWOT analysis,
- beekeepers,
- TOWS,
- local economy,
- Italian market,
- associations
Citation: Giulia Mastromonaco, Simone Blanc, Antonina Sparacino, Chiara Medoro, Stefano Predieri, Marta Cianciabella. Challenges and opportunities of sustainability, certifications and traceability in the Italian beekeeping sector[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(2): 314-336. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025016

Related Papers:

Abstract

The impact of beekeeping on agricultural activity is significant in environmental and economic terms, supporting biodiversity through pollination and contributing to rural livelihoods. However, in recent years, this activity has been increasingly threatened by climate change, competition from imported products, and widespread honey fraud, which undermine the sector's sustainability and profitability. This study explores the perceptions of Italian beekeepers and their associations with sustainability, certification, and traceability in the sector. The aim was to identify the challenges and the opportunities for the Italian beekeeping sector in sustainability, traceability, and certification. To this end, two types of analysis were applied to combine the results of the focus groups with three association/consortia and a survey of 360 beekeepers. Through this combination, the research highlights the challenges facing the sector, particularly those related to climate change and biodiversity loss. Associations emphasized the critical role of technical support and legislative measures in promoting sustainable practices, including improved regulation of hive products imports and combating honey fraud. Beekeepers showed strong awareness of their environmental and social role, particularly in pollination and biodiversity conservation, but less engagement with broader systemic issues such as certified production and climate change mitigation. Amateur beekeepers showed greater sensitivity to sustainability issues than professionals. The findings highlight the importance of collaboration between associations, policy makers and stakeholders to address immediate operational needs and promote long-term sustainability in the beekeeping sector.

References

[1]	ISMEA (2024) Api e miele—News e analisi—Tendenze. Available from: https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/13170.
[2]	Matias DMS, Leventon J, Rau A-L, et al. (2017) A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts. Ambio 46: 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0844-z doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0844-z
[3]	Papa G, Maier R, Durazzo A, et al. (2022) The honey bee Apis mellifera: An insect at the interface between human and ecosystem health. Biology 11: 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020233 doi: 10.3390/biology11020233
[4]	Vinci G, Rapa M, Roscioli F (2018) Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Mexico through Beekeeping. https://doi.org/10.23958/ijsei/vol04-i08/01
[5]	Chambó E (2016) Beekeeping and Bee Conservation: Advances in Research, BoD—Books on Demand. https://doi.org/10.5772/61424
[6]	Durazzo A, Lucarini M, Plutino M, et al. (2021) Bee products: A representation of biodiversity, sustainability, and health. Life 11: 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11090970 doi: 10.3390/life11090970
[7]	Gutiérrez-Briceño I, García-Llorente M, Ortega-Marcos JJ, et al. (2023) Exploring the effect of landscape composition and agroecological practices on wild bees in horticultural farms. Basic Appl Ecol 71: 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2023.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2023.05.003
[8]	Winfree R (2010) The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Ann New York Acad Sci 1195: 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x
[9]	Kim Y, Vonortas NS (2014) Cooperation in the formative years: Evidence from small enterprises in Europe. Eur Manage J 32: 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.003
[10]	Cvitanovic C, Shellock RJ, Mackay M, et al. (2021) Strategies for building and managing 'trust' to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 123: 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020
[11]	Sparacino A, Merlino VM, Blanc S, et al. (2022) A choice experiment model for honey attributes: Italian consumer preferences and socio-demographic profiles. Nutrients 14: 4797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224797 doi: 10.3390/nu14224797
[12]	Zanchini R, Blanc S, Pippinato L, et al. (2022) Consumers' attitude towards honey consumption for its health benefits: First insights from an econometric approach. Br Food J 124: 4372–4386. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-0992 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-0992
[13]	Šedík P, Hudecová M, Predanócyová K (2023) Exploring consumers' preferences and attitudes to honey: Generation approach in Slovakia. Foods 12: 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12101941 doi: 10.3390/foods12101941
[14]	Sparacino A, Merlino VM, Borra D, et al. (2023) Web content analysis of beekeeping website companies: Communication and marketing strategies in the Italian context. J Mark Commun 0: 1–22.
[15]	Šedík P, Horská E, Adam Š, et al. (2020) Mineral content as an aspect of nutrition marketing: Case study of honey market in Slovakia. J Food Nutr Res 59: 185–192.
[16]	Pippinato L, Blanc S, Mancuso T, et al. (2020) A sustainable niche market: How does honey behave? Sustainability 12: 10678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410678 doi: 10.3390/su122410678
[17]	Covaci B (2020) Natural Honey Market: EU28 and BRICS Competitiveness Evidences Regarding Mountain Natural Honey.
[18]	Simone Blanc, Giulia Mastromonaco, Valentina Maria Merlino, et al. (2024) Indagine socioeconomica sull'apicolturain Piemonte: prospettive e sfide per il futuro del settore, DISAFA Editore.
[19]	Aguado-Gragera C, Sama-Berrocal C, Mesías FJ, et al. (2024) Challenges and opportunities of short food supply chains in Spain: A stakeholder participatory study. J Agric Food Res 18: 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101276 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101276
[20]	Tarnavölgyi G (2003) Analysis of consumersx attitudes towards food additives using focus group survey. Agric Conspectus Sci 68: 193–196.
[21]	Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, et al. (2018) The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evolution 9: 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
[22]	Bilska B, Tomaszewska M, Kołożyn-Krajewska D (2022) The management of meals in food service establishments in the context of food waste—Results of focus group interviews with employees and owners. Sustainability 14: 9258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159258 doi: 10.3390/su14159258
[23]	Baudino C, Giuggioli NR, Briano R, et al. (2017) Integrated methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for improving production chains and environmental sustainability of kiwifruit and baby kiwi in Italy. Sustainability 9: 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091621 doi: 10.3390/su9091621
[24]	King C, Gunton J, Freebairn D, et al. (2000) The sustainability indicator industry: Where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. Aust J Exp Agric 40: 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99148 doi: 10.1071/EA99148
[25]	Bruzzese S, Blanc S, Brun F (2020) Strategies for the valorisation of chestnut resources in Italian mountainous areas from a sustainable development perspective. Resources 9: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050060 doi: 10.3390/resources9050060
[26]	Blanc S, Brun F, Mosso A (2019) Performance analysis of logging enterprises operating in the Western Italian Alps. Qual-Access Success 20: 74–81.
[27]	Weihrich H (1982) The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plann 15: 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0 doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0
[28]	Clermont A, Eickermann, Michael, Kraus, François, et al. (2014) A survey on some factors potentially affecting losses of managed honey bee colonies in Luxembourg over the winters 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. J Apic Res 53: 43–56. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.04 doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.04
[29]	R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
[30]	Nikolaou IE, Evangelinos KI (2010) A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek mining and mineral industry. Resour Policy 35: 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.02.002
[31]	Van Espen M, Williams JH, Alves F, et al. (2023) Beekeeping in Europe facing climate change: A mixed methods study on perceived impacts and the need to adapt according to stakeholders and beekeepers. Sci Total Environ 888: 164255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164255 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164255
[32]	Vercelli M, Novelli S, Ferrazzi P, et al. (2021) A qualitative analysis of beekeepers' perceptions and farm management adaptations to the impact of climate change on honey bees. Insects 12: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12030228 doi: 10.3390/insects12030228
[33]	Remotti F, Mattalia G, Porporato M, et al. (2024) 'The rules of nature are changing; every year is unpredictable': perceptions of climate change by beekeepers of Liguria, NW Italy. Reg Environ Change 24: 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02242-3 doi: 10.1007/s10113-024-02242-3
[34]	Cappellari A, Malagnini V, Fontana P, et al. (2024) Impact of landscape composition on honey bee pollen contamination by pesticides: A multi-residue analysis. Chemosphere 349: 140829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140829 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140829
[35]	Chiesa LM, Labella GF, Giorgi A, et al. (2016) The occurrence of pesticides and persistent organic pollutants in Italian organic honeys from different productive areas in relation to potential environmental pollution. Chemosphere 154: 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.004
[36]	Tosi S, Costa C, Vesco U, et al. (2018) A 3-year survey of Italian honey bee-collected pollen reveals widespread contamination by agricultural pesticides. Sci Total Environ 615: 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.226 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.226
[37]	El Agrebi N, Steinhauer N, Renault V, et al. (2022) Beekeepers perception of risks affecting colony loss: A pilot survey. Transboundary Emerging Dis 69: 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14023 doi: 10.1111/tbed.14023
[38]	Fisher A Ⅱ, Tadei R, Berenbaum M, et al. (2023) Breaking the cycle: Reforming pesticide regulation to protect pollinators. BioScience 73: 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad088 doi: 10.1093/biosci/biad088
[39]	Prodanović R, Brkić I, Soleša K, et al. (2024) Beekeeping as a tool for sustainable rural development. J Agron, Technol Eng Manag 7: 1054–1066. https://doi.org/10.55817/IXVM2800 doi: 10.55817/IXVM2800
[40]	Al Naggar Y, Codling G, Giesy JP, et al. (2018) Beekeeping and the need for pollination from an agricultural perspective in Egypt. Bee World 95: 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2018.1484202 doi: 10.1080/0005772X.2018.1484202
[41]	Devkota K, Dhakal SC, Thapa RB (2016) Economics of beekeeping as pollination management practices adopted by farmers in Chitwan district of Nepal. Agric Food Secur 5: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-016-0053-9 doi: 10.1186/s40066-016-0053-9
[42]	Richardson K (2023) Beekeeping role in enhancing food security and environmental public health. HEM 4: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.61093/hem.2023.4-06 doi: 10.61093/hem.2023.4-06
[43]	Entrena-Durán F, Muñoz-Sánchez V-M, Pérez-Flores A-M (2021) Sustainability and development: From agrarian development to the paradigm of sustainability. Sustainability 13: 6175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116175 doi: 10.3390/su13116175
[44]	Huet J-C, Bougueroua L, Kriouile Y, et al. (2022) Digital transformation of beekeeping through the use of a decision making architecture. Appl Sci 12: 11179. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111179 doi: 10.3390/app122111179
[45]	Moore JC, Spink J, Lipp M (2012) Development and application of a database of food ingredient fraud and economically motivated adulteration from 1980 to 2010. J Food Sci 77: R118–R126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x
[46]	García NL (2018) The current situation on the international honey market. Bee World 95: 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2018.1483814 doi: 10.1080/0005772X.2018.1483814
[47]	Gustafson CR, Champetier A, Tuyizere O, et al. (2024) The impact of honey fraud information on the valuation of honey origin: Evidence from an incentivized economic experiment. Food Control 155: 110070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110070 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110070
[48]	Mascarello G, Pinto A, Crovato S, et al. (2024) Consumers' perceptions and behaviors regarding honey purchases and expectations on traceability and sustainability in Italy. Sustainability 16: 8846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208846 doi: 10.3390/su16208846
[49]	Schifani G, Romeo P, Dara Guccione G, et al. (2016) Conventions of quality in consumer preference toward local honey in southern Italy. Qual-Access Success 17: 92–97.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)