In recent years, developed economies have become aware of the importance of respecting the environment in the economic development of countries. As it is reflected in Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 and 9 of the 2030 United Nations' Agenda which promote sustainable growth and environmentally friendly industrialisation. Environmental impacts are more visible in the industrial sector than in all other productive sectors. In the case of Spain, 55.66% of companies in this industrial sector consider it important to invest in R&D with the aim of reducing such environmental impacts. This paper shows that the pursuit of this objective constitutes a fundamental element in the innovative process and describes its consequences on the productivity of industrial companies. Estimates of the relationships between R&D investment, innovation, and productivity were established using a CDM structural model applied to a sample of Spanish industrial companies included in the Technological Innovation Panel database. The results obtained confirm that business involvement in the reduction of environmental impact has positive and statistically significant effects on the decision to invest in R&D and the amount of effort involved, on the probability of conducting innovative activities, and on productivity, showing that productivity is 6.5% higher in industrial companies that attempt to reduce environmental impacts than in those that do not.
Citation: Alejandro García-Pozo, Elena Lasso-Dela-Vega, Marina Marfil-Cotilla, Juan Antonio Campos-Soria. The involvement of the Spanish industrial sector in environmental sustainability and its impact on productivity[J]. National Accounting Review, 2026, 8(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2026001
In recent years, developed economies have become aware of the importance of respecting the environment in the economic development of countries. As it is reflected in Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 and 9 of the 2030 United Nations' Agenda which promote sustainable growth and environmentally friendly industrialisation. Environmental impacts are more visible in the industrial sector than in all other productive sectors. In the case of Spain, 55.66% of companies in this industrial sector consider it important to invest in R&D with the aim of reducing such environmental impacts. This paper shows that the pursuit of this objective constitutes a fundamental element in the innovative process and describes its consequences on the productivity of industrial companies. Estimates of the relationships between R&D investment, innovation, and productivity were established using a CDM structural model applied to a sample of Spanish industrial companies included in the Technological Innovation Panel database. The results obtained confirm that business involvement in the reduction of environmental impact has positive and statistically significant effects on the decision to invest in R&D and the amount of effort involved, on the probability of conducting innovative activities, and on productivity, showing that productivity is 6.5% higher in industrial companies that attempt to reduce environmental impacts than in those that do not.
| [1] |
Acosta M, Coronado D, Romero C (2015) Linking public support, R&D, innovation and productivity: New evidence from the Spanish food industry. Food Policy 57: 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.005
|
| [2] |
Amores-Salvadó J, Martín-de Castro G, Navas-López JE (2014) Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J Clean Prod 83: 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.059 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.059
|
| [3] |
Bartelsman E, van Leeuwen G, Polder M (2017) CDM using a cross-country micro moments database. Econ Innov New Technol 26: 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202517 doi: 10.1080/10438599.2016.1202517
|
| [4] |
Beise M, Rennings K (2005) Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecol Econ 52: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007
|
| [5] |
Brown, F, Guzmán A (2014) Innovation and productivity across Mexican manufacturing firms. J Technol Manage Innov 9: 36–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000400003 doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000400003
|
| [6] |
Bukstein D, Hernández E, Usher X (2019) Assessing the Impacts of Market Failures on Innovation Investment in Uruguay. J Technol Manage Innov 14: 137–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0001201 doi: 10.18235/0001201
|
| [7] |
Cappellari L, Jenkins S (2003) Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. Stata J 3: 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300305 doi: 10.1177/1536867X0300300305
|
| [8] |
Castellacci F (2011) How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway. Econ Innov New Technol 20: 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2010.516535 doi: 10.1080/10438599.2010.516535
|
| [9] |
Chakraborty P, Chatterjee C (2017) Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India. Res Policy 46: 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.004
|
| [10] |
Costa-Campi MT, Duch-Brown N, Garcia-Quevedo J (2014) R&D drivers and obstacles to innovation in the energy industry. Energy Econ 46: 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.003
|
| [11] |
Crepon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J (1998) Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Econ Innov New Technol 7: 115–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031 doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
|
| [12] | De Bustos A, Cutanda A, Díaz A, et al. (2008) La BD Mores en base 2000: Nuevas estimaciones y variables. Documento de Trabajo No. D-2008-08. Madrid: Dirección General de Presupuestos, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda. |
| [13] |
De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41: 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002
|
| [14] |
Doran J, Ryan G (2012) Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur J Innov Manag 15: 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272367 doi: 10.1108/14601061211272367
|
| [15] |
Duch-Brown N, de Panizza A, Rohman IK (2018) Innovation and productivity in a science-and-technology intensive sector: Information industries in Spain. Sci Public Policy 45: 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx072 doi: 10.1093/scipol/scx072
|
| [16] | FECYT (2007) Informe PITEC 2007: La innovación en la empresa española, Madrid. |
| [17] |
Frank AG, Cortimiglia MN, Ribeiro JLD, et al. (2016) The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies. Res Policy 45: 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.011
|
| [18] | García A, Jaumandreu J, Rodríguez C (1998) Innovation and Jobs at the firm level. Documento de Trabajo No. 9810. Fundación Empresa Pública, Madrid. |
| [19] |
García-Pozo A, Campos-Soria JA, Núñez-Carrasco JA (2021) Technological innovation and productivity across Spanish regions. Ann Reg Sci 67: 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-01044-9 doi: 10.1007/s00168-020-01044-9
|
| [20] |
García-Pozo A, Marchante-Mera AJ, Campos-Soria JA (2018a) Innovation, environment, and productivity in the Spanish service sector: An implementation of a CDM structural model. J Clean Prod 171: 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.087 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.087
|
| [21] |
García-Pozo A, Sánchez-Ollero JL, Ons-Cappa M (2018b) Impact of introducing eco-innovation measures on productivity in transport sector companies. Int J Sustain Transp12: 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1414340 doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1414340
|
| [22] |
Gómez MC, Borrastero C (2021) The productivity impact of innovation on industry in Argentina. Int J Econ Bus 29: 183–205https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2021.1971485 doi: 10.1080/13571516.2021.1971485
|
| [23] |
Gong Z, Wang N (2022) The driving process of technological innovation in construction: a firm-level CDM analysis. Constr Innov 22: 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2020-0194 doi: 10.1108/CI-12-2020-0194
|
| [24] |
Griffith R, Huergo E, Mairesse J, et al. (2006) Innovation and productivity across four european countries. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 22: 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj028 doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grj028
|
| [25] |
Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10: 92–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321 doi: 10.2307/3003321
|
| [26] | Griliches Z (1986) Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970's. Am Econ Rev 76: 141–154 |
| [27] |
Hojnik J, Prokop V, Stejskal J (2021) R&D as bridge to sustainable development? Case of Czech Republic and Slovenia. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 29: 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2190 doi: 10.1002/csr.2190
|
| [28] |
Hall BH, Lotti F, Mairesse J (2009) Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Bus Econ 33: 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8 doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
|
| [29] |
Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352 doi: 10.2307/1912352
|
| [30] |
Hollen R, Vand Den Bosch F, Volberda H (2013) The role of management innovation in enabling technological process innovation: An inter-organizational perspective. Eur Manag Rev 10: 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12003 doi: 10.1111/emre.12003
|
| [31] | INE (2020) Waste generation by waste types, hazardousness and sectors of economic activity. National Accounts Series 2015–2019. Available from: https://www.ine.es/jaxi/Datos.htm?tpx = 33014. |
| [32] |
Klette TJ, Griliches Z (1996) The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous. J Appl Econom 11: 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199607)11:4 < 343::AID-JAE404 > 3.0.CO; 2-4 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199607)11:4 < 343::AID-JAE404 > 3.0.CO; 2-4
|
| [33] |
Kneller R, Manderson E (2012) Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34: 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001
|
| [34] |
Li H, He F, Deng G (2020) How does Environmental Regulation Promote Technological Innovation and Green Development? New Evidence from China. Pol J Environ Stud 29: 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108137 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108137
|
| [35] |
Lööf H, Heshmati A (2006) On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Econ Innov New Technol 15: 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500512810 doi: 10.1080/10438590500512810
|
| [36] |
Lööf H, Heshmati A (2002) Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: A firm-level innovation study. Int J Prod Econ 76: 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00147-5 doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00147-5
|
| [37] | Mairesse J, Jaumandreu J (2005) Panel-data estimates of the production function and the revenue function: What differences does it make? Scand J Econ 107: 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00431.x |
| [38] | Mariev O, Nagieva K, Pushkarev A, et al. (2022) Effects of R&D spending on productivity of the Russian firms: does technological intensity matter? Empir Econ 62: 2619–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02095-3 |
| [39] |
Mohnen P, Mairesse J, Dagenais M (2006) Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Econ Innov New Technol 15: 391–413. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12280. doi: 10.3386/w12280
|
| [40] |
Okan Tuncel C, Oktay D (2021) Innovation and productivity in Turkish manufacturing firms. Appl Econ Lett 29: 1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1950904 doi: 10.1080/13504851.2021.1950904
|
| [41] | OECD (2005) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (third edition). OECD and Eurostat, Brussels. |
| [42] | Pakes A, Griliches Z (1980) Patents and R and D at the firm level: a first look. Working Paper 561. NBER, Cambridge. |
| [43] |
Ramadani V, Hisrich RD, Abazi-Alili H, et al. (2019) Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 140: 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010
|
| [44] |
Raymond W, Mairesse J, Mohnen P, et al. (2015) Dynamic models of R&D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. Eur Econ Rev 78: 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002
|
| [45] | Raymond W, Mohnen P, Palm F, et al. (2010) Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious? Rev Econ Stat 92: 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00004 |
| [46] |
Siedschlag I, Zhang X (2015) Internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity. Econ Innov New Technol 24: 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918439 doi: 10.1080/10438599.2014.918439
|
| [47] |
Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, et al. (2012) Technological diversity of emerging eco-innovations: a case study of the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 37: 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.011
|
| [48] |
Trachuk A, Linder N (2018) Innovation and performance: an empirical study of Russian industrial companies. Int J Innov Technol Manag 15: 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987701850027X doi: 10.1142/S021987701850027X
|
| [49] |
Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L, Davia M A (2015) Eco-innovation by small and medium-sized firms in Europe: from end-of-pipe to cleaner technologies. Innovation 17: 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011059 doi: 10.1080/14479338.2015.1011059
|
| [50] |
Vokoun M (2016) Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: the case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica 43: 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9296-0 doi: 10.1007/s10663-015-9296-0
|
| [51] |
Cai W, Li G (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176: 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
|
| [52] |
Yang CH, Tseng YH, Chen CP (2012) Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34: 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.05.001
|
 NAR-08-01-001-s001.pdf |
 |
Alejandro García-Pozo, Elena Lasso-Dela-Vega, Marina Marfil-Cotilla, Juan Antonio Campos-Soria. The involvement of the Spanish industrial sector in environmental sustainability and its impact on productivity[J]. National Accounting Review, 2026, 8(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2026001
DownLoad: