This study analyzed tail-dependent lead-lag linkages between fossil and sustainable assets using daily WTI crude oil futures, clean-energy equities, and the S&P Green Bond Index from August 3, 2015, to August 7, 2025. Unlike existing literature that typically studies oil-clean energy or green bond-equities in isolation, we embedded fossil fuel prices, clean-energy equities, and green bonds in a single tail-state lead-lag system and documented how transmission patterns reconfigure across downside and upside regimes. To condition the analysis on common uncertainty proxies, returns were regressed on the CBOE VIX and the (log) U.S. Economic Policy Uncertainty index, and the resulting residual-based series were examined with the cross-quantilogram (CQ) across target quantiles τ1 ∈ {0.10, 0.50, 0.90}, conditional on source states τ2 ∈ {0.10, 0.90}, with ~95% confidence bands. Heatmaps summarize average CQ signs (co-movement vs. stabilization) and the breadth of significance across lags. Two regularities emerged. First, dependence is state- and tail-contingent. In downside states (τ2 = 0.10), patterns of strong downside co-movement and rally suppression are evident, particularly between oil and renewables, with modest but persistent linkages to green bonds. Second, in upside states (τ2 = 0.90), the dominant pattern shifts toward stabilization and selective upside clustering, most visible within the "green block" and through lagged upside predictability from green bonds toward oil. Overall, conditional on controls for VIX and EPU, fossil and sustainable assets exhibit asymmetric, tail-driven interdependence: diversification weakens during distress, while stabilization and selective upside synchronization dominate in buoyant markets. These findings provide valuable insights for tail-aware portfolio design and state-contingent risk management.
Citation: Ahmet Furkan Sak, Mustafa Celik, Faruk Temel, Ismail Celik. Tail-dependent lead-lag dynamics between fossil and sustainable assets: A Cross-Quantilogram approach[J]. Green Finance, 2026, 8(2): 271-297. doi: 10.3934/GF.2026010
This study analyzed tail-dependent lead-lag linkages between fossil and sustainable assets using daily WTI crude oil futures, clean-energy equities, and the S&P Green Bond Index from August 3, 2015, to August 7, 2025. Unlike existing literature that typically studies oil-clean energy or green bond-equities in isolation, we embedded fossil fuel prices, clean-energy equities, and green bonds in a single tail-state lead-lag system and documented how transmission patterns reconfigure across downside and upside regimes. To condition the analysis on common uncertainty proxies, returns were regressed on the CBOE VIX and the (log) U.S. Economic Policy Uncertainty index, and the resulting residual-based series were examined with the cross-quantilogram (CQ) across target quantiles τ1 ∈ {0.10, 0.50, 0.90}, conditional on source states τ2 ∈ {0.10, 0.90}, with ~95% confidence bands. Heatmaps summarize average CQ signs (co-movement vs. stabilization) and the breadth of significance across lags. Two regularities emerged. First, dependence is state- and tail-contingent. In downside states (τ2 = 0.10), patterns of strong downside co-movement and rally suppression are evident, particularly between oil and renewables, with modest but persistent linkages to green bonds. Second, in upside states (τ2 = 0.90), the dominant pattern shifts toward stabilization and selective upside clustering, most visible within the "green block" and through lagged upside predictability from green bonds toward oil. Overall, conditional on controls for VIX and EPU, fossil and sustainable assets exhibit asymmetric, tail-driven interdependence: diversification weakens during distress, while stabilization and selective upside synchronization dominate in buoyant markets. These findings provide valuable insights for tail-aware portfolio design and state-contingent risk management.
| [1] |
Abakah E, Tiwari A, Lee C, et al. (2022) Quantile price convergence and spillover effects among bitcoin, fintech, and artificial intelligence stocks. Int Rev Financ 23: 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12393 doi: 10.1111/irfi.12393
|
| [2] |
Albrecht P, Kapounek S, Kučerová Z, (2022) Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets' co-movements. Int J Finance Econ 28: 3471–3487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2603 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2603
|
| [3] |
Alsakka R, Gwilym O (2010) Leads and lags in sovereign credit ratings. J Bank Finance 34: 2614–2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.05.001
|
| [4] |
Amar A, Carlotti J (2020) Who drives the dance? Further insights from a time-frequency wavelet analysis of the interrelationship between stock markets and uncertainty. Int J Finance Econ 26: 1623–1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1867 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.1867
|
| [5] |
Badshah I, Frijns B, Tourani-Rad A (2013) Contemporaneous spill-over among equity, gold, and exchange rate implied volatility indices. J Futures Mark 33: 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21600 doi: 10.1002/fut.21600
|
| [6] |
Basnarkov L, Stojkoski V, Utkovski Z, et al. (2020) Lead–lag relationships in foreign exchange markets. Phys A 539: 122986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122986 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122986
|
| [7] |
Bollerslev T (2006) Leverage and volatility feedback effects in high-frequency data. J Financ Econom 4: 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbj014 doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbj014
|
| [8] |
Bunditsakulporn K (2022) The relationship between agricultural commodities and stock market in case of Thailand: Safe-haven, hedge, or diversifier? Cross quantilogram analysis. Int J Bus Adm Stud 8: 113–126. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.8.10002-3 doi: 10.20469/ijbas.8.10002-3
|
| [9] |
Chen Z, Matoušek R, Stewart C, et al. (2019) Do rating agencies exhibit herding behaviour? Evidence from sovereign ratings. Int Rev Financ Anal 64: 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.04.011
|
| [10] |
Chiou I (2011) The volatility transmission of stock returns across Asia, Europe, and North America. Manag Financ 37: 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351111126924 doi: 10.1108/03074351111126924
|
| [11] |
Chordia T, Goyal A, Nozawa Y, et al. (2017) Are capital market anomalies common to equity and corporate bond markets? An empirical investigation. J Financ Quant Anal 52: 1301–1342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000515 doi: 10.1017/S0022109017000515
|
| [12] |
Chung H, Chan W, Batten J (2011) Threshold non-linear dynamics between Hang Seng stock index and futures returns. Eur J Financ 17: 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2010.481469 doi: 10.1080/1351847X.2010.481469
|
| [13] |
Curme C, Tumminello M, Mantegna R, et al. (2015) Emergence of statistically validated financial intraday lead-lag relationships. Quant Financ 15: 1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2015.1032545 doi: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1032545
|
| [14] |
Demir M, Martell T, Wang J (2018) The trilogy of China cotton markets: The lead–lag relationship among spot, forward, and futures markets. J Futures Mark 39: 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21981 doi: 10.1002/fut.21981
|
| [15] |
Drakos A, Diamandis P, Kouretas G (2015) Information diffusion and the lead-lag relationship between small and large size portfolios: Evidence from an emerging market. Int J Econ Financ 7: 25–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n11p25 doi: 10.5539/ijef.v7n11p25
|
| [16] |
Dutta A, Bouri E, Saeed T, et al. (2020) Impact of energy sector volatility on clean energy assets. Energy 212: 118657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118657 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118657
|
| [17] |
Fonseca J, Zaatour R (2016) Correlation and lead–lag relationships in a Hawkes microstructure model. J Futures Mark 37: 260–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21800 doi: 10.1002/fut.21800
|
| [18] |
Fung J, Lau F, Tse Y (2015) The impact of sampling frequency on intraday correlation and lead-lag relationships between index futures and individual stocks. J Futures Mark 35: 939–952. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21715 doi: 10.1002/fut.21715
|
| [19] |
Gruener A, Finke C (2017) Lead-lag relationships in international stock markets revisited: Are they exploitable? Int J Financ Res 9: 8–30. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p8 doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p8
|
| [20] |
Han H, Linton O, Oka T, et al. (2016) The cross-quantilogram: Measuring quantile dependence and testing directional predictability between time series. J Econom 193: 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.001
|
| [21] |
Hayashi T, Koike Y (2019) No arbitrage and lead-lag relationships. Stat Probab Lett 154: 108530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2019.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2019.06.006
|
| [22] |
He M, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2023) The predictability of iron ore futures prices: A product-material lead-lag effect. J Futures Mark 43: 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22440 doi: 10.1002/fut.22440
|
| [23] |
Huth N, Abergel F (2014) High-frequency lead/lag relationships: Empirical facts. J Empir Financ 26: 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.01.003
|
| [24] |
Jambotkar M, Raju G (2020) Does gold retain its hedge and safe haven role for energy sector indices during COVID-19 pandemic? A crossquantilogram approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 11: 233–240. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10294 doi: 10.32479/ijeep.10294
|
| [25] |
Karim S, Lucey BM, Naeem MA, et al. (2024) Extreme risk dependence between green bonds and financial markets. Eur Financ Manag 30: 935–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12458 doi: 10.1111/eufm.12458
|
| [26] |
Linton O, Whang YJ (2007) The quantilogram: With an application to evaluating directional predictability. J Econom 141: 250–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.004
|
| [27] |
Lupu I, Hurduzeu G, Lupu R (2022) How is the ESG reflected in European financial stability? Sustainability 14: 10287. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610287 doi: 10.3390/su141610287
|
| [28] |
Mensi W, Gubareva M, Ko H, Vo XV, Kang SH (2023) Tail spillover effects between cryptocurrencies and uncertainty in the gold, oil, and stock markets. Financ Innov 9: 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00498-y doi: 10.1186/s40854-023-00498-y
|
| [29] |
Mensi W, Naeem MA, Vo XV, et al. (2022) Dynamic and frequency spillovers between green bonds, oil and G7 stock markets: Implications for risk management. Econ Anal Policy 73: 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.11.015 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.11.015
|
| [30] |
Mujtaba G, Siddique A, Naifar N, et al. (2024) Hedge and safe haven role of commodities for the US and Chinese equity markets. Int J Financ Econ 29: 2381–2414. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2788 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2788
|
| [31] |
Nordén L, Weber M (2009) The co-movement of credit default swap, bond and stock markets: An empirical analysis. Eur Financ Manag 15: 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00427.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00427.x
|
| [32] |
Odilova S, Sharipova Z, Azam S (2023) Investing in the future: A systematic literature review on renewable energy and its impact on financial returns. Int J Energy Econ Policy 13: 329–337. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14375 doi: 10.32479/ijeep.14375
|
| [33] |
Okorie D, Lin B (2020) Crude oil market and Nigerian stocks: An asymmetric information spillover approach. Int J Financ Econ 27: 4002–4017. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2356 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2356
|
| [34] |
Politis DN, Romano JP (1994) The stationary bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290993 doi: 10.2307/2290993
|
| [35] |
Politis DN, White H (2004) Automatic block-length selection for the dependent bootstrap. Econom Rev 23: 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-120028836 doi: 10.1081/ETC-120028836
|
| [36] |
Qin P, Bai M (2022) Does oil price uncertainty matter in stock market volatility forecasting? PLoS One 17: e0277319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277319 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277319
|
| [37] |
Reboredo JC (2018) Green bond and financial markets: Co-movement, diversification and price spillover effects. Energy Econ 74: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030
|
| [38] |
Rubbaniy G, Khalid A, Syriopoulos K, et al. (2022) Safe-haven properties of soft commodities during times of COVID-19. J Commod Mark 27: 100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2021.100223 doi: 10.1016/j.jcomm.2021.100223
|
| [39] |
Sohag K, Islam M, Žiković I, et al. (2022) Food inflation and geopolitical risks: Analyzing European regions amid the Russia-Ukraine war. Br Food J 125: 2368–2391. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0793 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0793
|
| [40] |
Sun Y, Jin Q, Cheng Q, et al. (2019) New tool for stock investment risk management. Ind Manag Data Syst 120: 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2019-0125 doi: 10.1108/IMDS-03-2019-0125
|
| [41] |
Tiwari A, Adewuyi A, Roubaud D (2019) Dependence between the global gold market and emerging stock markets (E7+1): Evidence from Granger causality using quantile and quantile-on-quantile regression methods. World Econ 42: 2172–2214. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12775 doi: 10.1111/twec.12775
|
| [42] |
Tolikas K (2017) The lead-lag relation between the stock and the bond markets. Eur J Financ 24: 849–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1340320 doi: 10.1080/1351847X.2017.1340320
|
| [43] |
Troster V, Penalva J, Taamouti A, et al. (2021) Cointegration, information transmission, and the lead-lag effect between industry portfolios and the stock market. J Forecast 40: 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2767 doi: 10.1002/for.2767
|
| [44] |
Výrost T, Lyócsa Š, Baumöhl E (2019) Network-based asset allocation strategies. N Am J Econ Financ 47: 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2018.06.008
|
| [45] |
Wang Y, Zhao J, Li Q, et al. (2024) Considering momentum spillover effects via graph neural network in option pricing. J Futures Mark 44: 1069–1094. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22506 doi: 10.1002/fut.22506
|
| [46] |
Xu Q, Ye Y (2023) Commodity network and predictable returns. J Futures Mark 43: 1423–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22420 doi: 10.1002/fut.22420
|