Citation: Yu. A. Desheva, A. S. Mamontov, P. G. Nazarov. Contribution of antibody-dependent enhancement to the pathogenesis of coronavirus infections[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2020, 4(3): 50-59. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2020005
[1] | Xin-Guang Yang, Lu Li, Xingjie Yan, Ling Ding . The structure and stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(4): 1395-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2020074 |
[2] | Shu Wang, Mengmeng Si, Rong Yang . Dynamics of stochastic 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equations on unbounded domains. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 904-927. doi: 10.3934/era.2023045 |
[3] | Lingrui Zhang, Xue-zhi Li, Keqin Su . Dynamical behavior of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony system with finite distributed delay in 3D. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6881-6897. doi: 10.3934/era.2023348 |
[4] | Pan Zhang, Lan Huang, Rui Lu, Xin-Guang Yang . Pullback dynamics of a 3D modified Navier-Stokes equations with double delays. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4137-4157. doi: 10.3934/era.2021076 |
[5] | Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao . Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2489-2516. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126 |
[6] | Wei Shi, Xinguang Yang, Xingjie Yan . Determination of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(10): 3872-3886. doi: 10.3934/era.2022197 |
[7] | Keqin Su, Rong Yang . Pullback dynamics and robustness for the 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with memory. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 928-946. doi: 10.3934/era.2023046 |
[8] | Nisachon Kumankat, Kanognudge Wuttanachamsri . Well-posedness of generalized Stokes-Brinkman equations modeling moving solid phases. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1641-1661. doi: 10.3934/era.2023085 |
[9] | Zhiqing Li, Wenbin Zhang, Yuanfei Li . Structural stability for Forchheimer fluid in a semi-infinite pipe. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1466-1484. doi: 10.3934/era.2023074 |
[10] | Wenlong Sun . The boundedness and upper semicontinuity of the pullback attractors for a 2D micropolar fluid flows with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(3): 1343-1356. doi: 10.3934/era.2020071 |
The delay effect originates from the boundary controllers in engineering. The dynamics of a system with boundary delay could be described mathematically by a differential equation with delay term subject to boundary value condition such as [20]. There are many results available in literatures on the well-posedness and pullback dynamics of fluid flow models with delays especially the 2D Navier-Stokes equations, which can be seen in [1], [2], [8] and references therein. Inspired by these works, in this paper, we study the stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer (BF) equation with delay, which is also a continuation of our previous work in [6]. The existence and structure of attractors are significant to understand the large time behavior of solutions for non-autonomous evolutionary equations. Furthermore, the asymptotic stability of trajectories inside invariant sets determines many important properties of trajectories. The 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay is given below:
{∂u∂t−νΔu+αu+β|u|u+γ|u|2u+∇p=f(t,ut)+g(x,t),∇⋅u=0, u(t,x)|∂Ω=0,u|t=τ=uτ(x), x∈Ω,uτ(θ,x)=u(τ+θ,x)=ϕ(θ), θ∈(−h,0), h>0. | (1) |
Here,
(1). a general delay
or
(2). the special application of
f(t,ut)=F(u(t−ρ(t))) | (2) |
for a smooth function
The BF equation describes the conservation law of fluid flow in a porous medium that obeys the Darcy's law. The physical background of 3D BF model can be seen in [14], [9], [18], [19]. For the dynamic systems of problem
(a) For problem (1) with delay
(b) For problem (1) with special application of
(c) The asymptotic stability of trajectories inside pullback attractors is further research of the results established in [6]. However, the stability of pullback attractors for (1) with infinite delay is still unknown.
In this section, we give some notations and the equivalent abstract form of (1) in this section.
Denoting
By the Helmholz-Leray projection defined above, (1) can be transformed to the abstract equivalent form
{∂u∂t+νAu+P(αu+β|u|u+γ|u|2u)=Pf(t,ut)+Pg(t,x),u|∂Ω=0,u|t=τ=uτ(x),uτ(θ,x)=ϕ(θ,x) for θ∈(−h,0), | (3) |
then we show our results for (3) with
We also define some Banach spaces on delayed interval as
‖ϕ‖CH=supθ∈[−h,0]‖ϕ(θ)‖H, ‖ϕ‖CV=supθ∈[−h,0]‖ϕ(θ)‖V, |
respectively. The Lebesgue integrable spaces on delayed interval can be denoted as
Some assumptions on the external forces and parameters which will be imposed in our main results are the following:
‖f(t,ξ)−f(t,η)‖H≤Lf‖ξ−η‖CH, for ξ,η∈CH. |
∫tτ‖f(r,ur)−f(r,vr)‖2Hdr≤C2f∫tτ−h‖u(r)−v(r)‖2Hdr, for τ≤t. | (4) |
∫t−∞eηs‖g(s,⋅)‖2V′ds<∞. | (5) |
holds for any
Lemma 3.1. (The Gronwall inequality with differential form) Let
ddtm(t)≤v(t)m(t)+h(t), m(t=τ)=mτ, t≥τ. | (6) |
Then
m(t)≤mτe∫tτv(s)ds+∫tτh(s)e∫tsv(σ)dσds, t≥τ. | (7) |
In this part, we shall present some retarded integral inequalities from Li, Liu and Ju [5]. Consider the following retarded integral inequalities:
‖y(t)‖X≤E(t,τ)‖yτ‖X+∫tτK1(t,s)‖ys‖Xds+∫∞tK2(t,s)‖ys‖Xds+ρ, ∀ t≥τ, | (8) |
where
Let
κ(K1,K2)=supt≥τ(∫tτK1(t,s)ds+∫∞tK2(t,s)ds). |
We assume that
limt→+∞E(t+s,s)=0 | (9) |
uniformly with respect to
Lemma 3.2. (The retarded Gronwall inequality) Denoting
(1) If
‖yt‖X<μρ+ε, | (10) |
for
(2) If
‖yt‖X≤M‖y0‖Xe−λt+γρ, t≥τ | (11) |
for all bounded functions
(3) If
Proof. See Li, Liu and Ju [5].
Remark 1. (The special case:
The minimal family of pullback attractors will be stated here in preparation for our main result.
Lemma 3.3. (1) (See [7], [11]) Assume that
(|a|β−2a−|b|β−2b)⋅(a−b)≥γ0|a−b|β, |
where
(2) The following
|xq−yq|≤Cq(|x|q−1+|y|q−1)|x−y| |
for the integer
Theorem 3.4. Assume that the external forces
Proof. Step 1. Existence of local approximate solution.
By the property of the Stokes operator
Awi=λiwi, i=1,2,⋯. | (12) |
Let
{(∂tum,wj)+ν(∇um,∇wj)+(αum+β|um|um+γ|um|2um,wj)=(f(t,umt),wj)+⟨g,wj⟩,um(τ)=Pmuτ=uτm,umτ(θ,x)=Pmϕ(θ)=ϕm(θ) for θ∈[−h,0], | (13) |
Then it is easy to check that (13) is equivalent to an ordinary differential equations with unknown variable function
Step 2. Uniform estimates of approximate solutions.
Multiplying (13) by
12ddt‖um‖2H+ν‖um‖2V+α‖um‖2H+β‖um‖3L3(Ω)+γ‖um‖4L4(Ω)≤|(g(t)+f(s,umt(s)),um)|≤α‖um‖2H+ν2‖um‖2V+12ν‖g(t)‖2V′+14α‖f(t,umt)‖2H. | (14) |
Integrating in time, using the hypotheses on
‖um‖2H+ν∫tτ‖um‖2Vds+2β∫tτ‖um‖3L3(Ω)ds+2γ∫tτ‖um‖4L4(Ω)ds≤‖uτ‖2H+C2f4α∫0−h‖ϕ(s)‖2Hds+12ν∫tτ‖g(s)‖2V′ds+C2f4α∫tτ‖um‖2Hds. | (15) |
Using the Gronwall Lemma of integrable form, we conclude that
{um} is bounded in the spaceL∞(τ,T;H)∩L2(τ−h,T;V)∩L3(τ,T;L3(Ω))∩L4(τ,T;L4(Ω)). |
Step 3. Compact argument and passing to limit for deriving the global weak solutions.
In this step, we shall prove
dumdt=−νAum−αum−β|um|um−γ|um|2um+P(g(t)+f(t,umt) | (16) |
and assumptions
By virtue of the Aubin-Lions Lemma, we obtain that
{um(t)⇀u(t) weakly * in L∞(τ,T;H),um(t)→u(t) stongly in L2(τ,T;H),um(t)⇀u(t) weakly in L2(τ,T;V),dum/dt⇀du/dt weakly in L2(τ,T;V′),f(⋅,um⋅)⇀f(⋅,u⋅) weakly in L2(τ,T;H),um⇀u(t) weakly in L3(τ,T;L3(Ω)),um⇀u(t) weakly in L4(τ,T;L4(Ω)) | (17) |
which coincides with the initial data
For the purpose of passing to limit in (13), denoting
∫Tτ(β|um|um−β|u|u,wj)ds≤Cλ1β‖um‖4L4(τ,T;L4(Ω))‖um−u‖4L4(τ,T;L4(Ω))+Cβ‖um−u‖L∞(τ,T;H)‖u‖2L2(τ−h,T;H) |
and
∫Tτ(γ|um|2um−γ|u|2u,wj)ds≤Cγ‖um‖2L2(τ,T;V)‖um−u‖4L4(τ,T;L4(Ω))+Cγ‖um−u‖4L4(τ,T;L4(Ω))(‖u‖2L2(τ−h,T;V)+‖um‖4L4(τ,T;L4(Ω))) | (18) |
and the convergence of delayed external force
Thus, passing to the limit of (13), we conclude that
Proposition 1. Assume that the external forces
Proof. Taking inner product of (3) with
12ddt‖A1/2u‖2H+ν‖Au‖2H+α‖A1/2u‖2H+β∫Ω|u|u⋅Audx+γ∫Ω|u|2u⋅Audx=(f(t,ut),Au)+(g(t),Au). | (19) |
According to Lemma 3.3, the nonlinear terms have the following estimates
|β(|u|u,Au)|≤ν2‖Au‖2H+β4ν‖u‖4L4 | (20) |
and
γ∫Ω|u|2u⋅Audx=γ2∫Ω|∇(|u|2)|2dx+γ∫Ω|u|2|∇u|2dx | (21) |
and
(f(t,ut),Au)+(g(t),Au)≤12ν‖f(t,ut)‖2H+12ν‖g(t)‖2H+ν2‖Au‖2H, | (22) |
hence, we conclude that
ddt‖A1/2u‖2H+2α‖A1/2u‖2H+γ∫Ω|∇(|u|2)|2dx+2γ∫Ω|u|2|∇u|2dx≤β2ν‖u‖4L4+1ν‖f(t,ut)‖2H+1ν‖g(t)‖2H. | (23) |
Letting
‖A1/2u(t)‖2H+2α∫ts‖A1/2u(r)‖2Hdr≤‖A1/2u(s)‖2H+β2ν∫ts‖u(r)‖4L4dr+2ν∫ts‖f(r,ur)‖2Hdr+2ν∫ts‖g(r)‖2Hdr | (24) |
and
∫ts‖f(r,ur)‖2Hdr≤L2f‖ϕ(θ)‖2L2H+L2f∫ts‖u(r)‖2Hdr. | (25) |
Then integrating with
‖A1/2u(t)‖2H≤∫tt−1‖A1/2u(s)‖2Hds+β2ν∫tt−1‖u(r)‖4L4dr+2L2fν‖ϕ(θ)‖2L2H+2L2fν∫tτ‖u(r)‖2Hdr+2ν∫tt−1‖g(r)‖2Hdr≤C[‖ϕ‖2L2H+‖uτ‖2H]+C∫tτ‖g‖2Hds+2L2fνλ1∫tτ‖u(r)‖2Vdr, | (26) |
which means the uniform boundedness of the global weak solution
Proposition 2. Assume the hypotheses in Theorem 3.4 hold. Then the global weak solution
Proof. Using the same energy estimates as above, we can deduce the uniqueness easily, here we skip the details.
To description of pullback attractors, the functional space
∫tτeηs‖f(s,us)‖2Hds<C2f∫tτ−heηs‖u(s)‖2Hds. | (27) |
for any
Proposition 3. For given
Lemma 3.5. Assume that
‖u(t)‖2H≤e−8ηCfα(t−τ)(‖uτ‖2H+Cf‖ϕ(r)‖2L2H)+e−8ηCfαtν−ηλ−1∫tτeηr‖g(r)‖2V′dr | (28) |
and
ν∫ts‖u(r)‖2Vdr≤‖u(s)‖2H+8Cfα‖us‖2L2H+1ν∫ts‖g(r)‖2V′dr+8Cfα∫ts‖u(r)‖2Hdr, | (29) |
β∫ts‖u(r)‖3L3(Ω)dr≤‖u(s)‖2H+8Cfα‖us‖2L2H+1ν∫ts‖g(r)‖2V′dr+8Cfα∫ts‖u(r)‖2Hdr, | (30) |
γ∫ts‖u(r)‖4L4(Ω)dr≤‖u(s)‖2H+8Cfα‖us‖2L2H+1ν∫ts‖g(r)‖2V′dr+8Cfα∫ts‖u(r)‖2Hdr. | (31) |
Proof. By the energy estimate of (1) and using Young's inequality, we arrive at
ddt‖u‖2H+2ν‖u‖2V+2α‖u‖2H+2β‖u‖3L3(Ω)+2γ‖u‖2L4(Ω)≤1ν−ηλ−1‖g‖2V′+(ν−ηλ−1)‖u‖2V+2α‖u‖2H+8α‖f(t,ut)‖2H, | (32) |
where
Multiplying the above inequality by
ddt(eηt‖u‖2H)+eηtνλ1‖u‖2H+2βeηt‖u‖3L3(Ω)+2γeηt‖u‖2L4(Ω)≤1ν−ηλ−1eηt‖g‖2V′+8Cfαeηt‖f(t,ut)‖2H. |
Thus integrating with respect to time variable, it yields
eηt‖u‖2H+νλ1∫tτeηr‖u(r)‖2Hdr≤eητ(‖uτ‖2H+Cf∫0−h‖ϕ(r)‖2Hdr)+1ν−ηλ−1∫tτeηr‖g(r)‖2V′dr+8Cfα∫tτeηr‖u(r)‖2Hdr | (33) |
and by the Gronwall Lemma, we can derive the estimate in our theorem.
Using the energy estimate of (1) again, we can check that
ddt‖u‖2H+2ν‖u‖2V+2α‖u‖2H+2β‖u‖3L3(Ω)+2γ‖u‖2L4(Ω)≤1ν‖g‖2V′+ν‖u‖2V+2α‖u‖2H+8α‖f(t,ut)‖2H, | (34) |
Integrating from
Based on Lemma 3.5, we can present the pullback dissipation based on the following universes for the tempered dynamics.
Definition 3.6. (Universe). (1) We will denote by
limτ→−∞(eητsup(ξ,ζ)∈D(τ)‖(ξ,ζ)‖2MH)=0. | (35) |
(2)
Remark 2. The universes
Proposition 4. (The
D0(t)=¯BH(0,ρH(t))×(¯BL2V(0,ρL2H(t))∩¯BCH(0,ρCH(t))) |
is the pullback
ρ2H(t)=1+e−8ηCfα(t−h)ν−ηλ−1∫t−∞eηr‖g(r)‖2V′dr,ρ2L2V(t)=1ν[1+‖uτ‖2H+8Cfα‖ϕ‖2L2H+‖g(r)‖2L2(t−h,t;V′)ν+8Cfhαρ2H(t)]. |
Moreover, the pullback
Proof. Using the estimates in Lemma 3.5, choosing any
‖u(t,τ;uτ,ϕ)‖2H≤ρ2H(t)=1+e−8ηCfα(t−h)ν−ηλ−1∫t−∞eηr‖g(r)‖2V′dr | (36) |
holds for any
Theorem 3.7. Assume that
Proof. Step 1. Weak convergence of the sequence
For arbitrary fixed
By using the similar energy estimate in Theorem 3.4 and technique in Proposition 4, there exists a pullback time
‖(un)′‖L2(t−h−1,t;V′)≤ν‖un‖L2(t−h−1,t;V)+αλ−11‖un‖L2(t−h−1,t;V)+β‖un‖L4(t−h−1,t;L4(Ω))+Cλ1,|Ω|γ‖un‖L2(t−h−1,t;V)+Cα‖f(t,unt)‖L2(t−h−1,t;H)+Cν‖g‖L2(t−h−1,t;V′). | (37) |
From the hypotheses
{un⇀u weakly * in L∞(t−3h−1,t;H),un⇀u weakly in L2(t−2h−1,t;V),(un)′⇀u′ weakly in L2(t−h−1,t;V′),um⇀u(t) weakly in L3(t−2h−1,t;L3(Ω)),um⇀u(t) weakly in L4(t−2h−1,t;L4(Ω)),un→u stongly in L2(t−h−1,t;H),un(s)→u(s) stongly in H, a.e. s∈(t−h−1,t). | (38) |
By Theorem 3.4, from the hypothesis on
f(⋅,un⋅)⇀f(⋅,u⋅) weakly in L2(t−h−1,t;H). | (39) |
Thus, from (38) and (39), we can conclude that
From the uniform bounded estimate of
un→u strongly in C([t−h−1,t];H). | (40) |
Therefore, we can conclude that
un(sn)⇀u(s) weakly in H | (41) |
for any
lim infn→∞‖un(sn)‖H≥‖u(s)‖H. | (42) |
Step 2. The strong convergence of corresponding sequences via energy equation method:
The asymptotic compactness of sequence
‖un(sn)−u(s)‖H→0 as n→+∞, | (43) |
which is equivalent to prove (42) combining with
lim supn→∞‖un(sn)‖H≤‖u(s)‖H | (44) |
for a sequence
Using the energy estimate to all
‖un(s2)‖2H+ν∫s2s1‖un(r)‖2Vdr+2β∫s2s1‖un(r)‖3L4(Ω)dr+2γ∫s2s1‖un(r)‖4L4(Ω)≤2C2fα∫s2s2‖unr‖2Hdr+8ν∫s2s1‖g(r)‖2V′dr | (45) |
and
‖u(s2)‖2H+ν∫s2s1‖u(r)‖2Vdr+2β∫s2s1‖u(r)‖3L4(Ω)dr+2γ∫s2s1‖u(r)‖4L4(Ω)≤2C2fα∫s2s2‖ur‖2Hdr+8ν∫s2s1‖g(r)‖2V′dr. | (46) |
Then, we define the functionals
Jn(s)=12‖un‖2H−∫st−h−1⟨g(r),un(r)⟩dr−∫st−h−1(f(r,unr),un(r))dr | (47) |
and
J(t)=12‖u(s)‖2H−∫st−h−1⟨g(r),u(r)⟩dr−∫st−h−1(f(r,ur),u(r))dr. | (48) |
Combining the convergence in (38), observing that
∫tt−h−1⟨g(r),un(r)⟩dr→2∫tt−h−1⟨g(r),u(r)⟩dr | (49) |
and
∫tt−h−1(f(r,unr),un(r))dr→2∫tt−h−1(f(r,ur),u(r))dr | (50) |
as
Jn(s)→J(s) a.e.s∈(t−h−1,t), | (51) |
i.e., for
|Jn(sk)−J(sk)|≤ε2. | (52) |
Since
|J(sk)−J(s)|≤ε2, | (53) |
Choosing
|Jn(sn)−J(s)|≤|Jn(sn)−J(sn)|+|J(sn)−J(s)|<ε. | (54) |
Therefore, for any
lim supn→∞Jn(sn)≤J(s), | (55) |
which implies
lim supn→∞‖un(sn)‖H≤‖u(s)‖H. | (56) |
we conclude the strong convergence
Step 3. The strong convergence:
Combining the energy estimates in (45) and (46), noting the energy functionals
‖un(s)‖L2(t−h,t;V)→‖u(s)‖L2(t−h,t;V). | (57) |
Hence jointing with the weak convergence in (38), we can derive that
Step 4. The
By using the results from Steps 2 to 4 and noting the definition of universe, we can conclude that the processes is
Remark 3. Using the similar technique, we can derive the processes
Theorem 3.8. Assume that
ADMHF(t)⊂ADMHη(t). | (58) |
Proof. From Proposition 3, we observe that the process
Based on the universes defined in Definition 3.6, the relation between
Definition 3.9. The pullback attractors is asymptotically stable if the trajectories inside attractor reduces to a single orbit as
Theorem 3.10. Assume that
G(t)≤K0, |
where
K0={[ν2λ1(2νλ1+α)]/[4C|Ω|β(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)]}1/2, |
here
Proof. Let
u(τ+θ)|θ∈[−h,0]=ϕ(θ), u|t=τ=uτ | (59) |
and
v(τ+θ)|θ∈[−h,0]=˜ϕ(θ), v|t=τ=˜uτ | (60) |
respectively. Denoting
(u,ut)=U(t,τ)(uτ,φ) and (v,vt)=U(t,τ)(˜uτ,˜φ) | (61) |
as two trajectories inside the pullback attractors, letting
{∂w∂t+νAw+P(αw+β(|u|u−|v|v)+γ(|u|2u−|v|2v))=P(f(t,ut)−f(t,vt)),w|∂Ω=0,w(t=τ)=uτ−˜uτ,w(τ+θ)=ϕ(θ)−˜ϕ(θ), θ∈[−h,0]. | (62) |
Taking inner product of (62) with
γ(|u|2u−|v|2v,u−v)≥γγ0‖u−v‖4L4 | (63) |
and
12ddt‖w‖2H+ν‖w‖2V+α‖w‖2H+γγ0‖w‖4L4≤|β(|u|u−|v|v,w)|+|(f(t,ut)−f(t,vt),w)|≤β(∫Ω|u|2|w|dx+∫Ω|w||v|2dx)+α2‖w‖2H+L2f2α‖wt‖2H |
≤β(‖u‖2L4+‖v‖2L4)‖w‖2H+α2‖w‖2H+L2f2α‖wt‖2H≤C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)‖w‖2H+α2‖w‖2H+L2f2α‖wt‖2H. | (64) |
Using the Poincaré inequality and Lemma 3.1, noting that if
2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)>0, | (65) |
then we can obtain
‖w‖2H≤e∫tτ[2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)−(2νλ1+α)]ds[‖uτ−˜uτ‖2H++L2fα∫tτe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσ‖wt‖2Hds]. | (66) |
Denoting
E(t,τ)=e−∫tτ[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]ds | (67) |
and
K1(t,s)=L2fαe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσ | (68) |
and
Θ=supt≥s≥τE(t,s), κ(K1,0)=supt≥τ∫tτK1(t,s)ds, | (69) |
by virtue of Lemma 3.2, choosing
‖wt‖2H≤M‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−λ(t−τ). | (70) |
Substituting (70) into (64), using Lemma 3.1 again, we can conclude the following estimate
‖w‖2H≤‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−∫tτ[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]ds+L2fαM‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−λ(t−τ)∫tτe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσds. | (71) |
From (70) and (71), if we fixed
2νλ1+α>2C|Ω|β⟨‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V⟩≤t, | (72) |
where
⟨h⟩≤t=lim supτ→−∞1t−τ∫tτh(r)dr. | (73) |
Since
12ddt‖u‖2H+ν‖A1/2u‖2H+α‖u‖2H+β‖u‖3L3+γ‖u‖4L4≤α‖u‖2H+12α[‖f(t,ut)‖2H+‖g‖2H]≤α‖u‖2H+L2f2α‖ut‖2H+12α‖g‖2H. | (74) |
Using the Poincaré inequality and Lemma 3.1, then we can obtain
‖u‖2H≤e−2νλ1(t−τ)‖uτ‖2H++L2fα∫tτe−2νλ1(t−s)‖us‖2Hds+1α∫tτe−2νλ1(t−s)‖g‖2Hds. | (75) |
Denoting
E(t,τ)=e−2νλ1(t−τ) | (76) |
and
K1(t,s)=L2fαe−2νλ1(t−s) | (77) |
and
ρ=1α∫tτe−2νλ1(t−s)‖g‖2Hds, | (78) |
letting
Θ=supt≥s≥τE(t,s), κ(K1,0)=supt≥τ∫tτK1(t,s)ds, | (79) |
by virtue of Lemma 3.2, choosing
‖ut‖2H≤ˆM‖uτ‖2He−λ(t−τ)+2−L2fα1−2L2fα∫tτe−2νλ1(t−s)‖g‖2Hds≤ˆM‖uτ‖2He−λ(t−τ)+2−L2fα1−2L2fα∫tτ‖g‖2Hds. | (80) |
Substituting (80) into (75), using Lemma 3.1 again, we can conclude the following estimate
‖u‖2H≤C‖uτ‖2He−λ(t−τ)+(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)∫tτ‖g‖2Hds. | (81) |
Integrating (74) from
‖u‖2H+2ν∫tτ‖u‖2Vds+2β∫tτ‖u‖3L3ds+2γ∫tτ‖u‖4L4ds≤[1α‖ϕ‖2L2H+‖uτ‖2H]+L2fα∫tτ‖ut(s)‖2Hds+1α∫tτ‖g‖2Hds. | (82) |
By the estimate of (80) and (81), we derive
∫tτ‖u(r)‖4L4dr≤C[1α‖ϕ‖2L2H+‖uτ‖2H]+(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)∫tτ‖g‖2Hds | (83) |
and
∫tτ‖u(r)‖2Vdr≤C[1α‖ϕ‖2L2H+‖uτ‖2H]+(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)∫tτ‖g‖2Hds. | (84) |
Combining (72), (73) with (84), we conclude that
⟨‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V⟩|≤t≤2(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)⟨‖g‖2H⟩|≤t | (85) |
and hence the asymptotic stability holds provided that
4C|Ω|β(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)⟨‖g‖2H⟩|≤t≤2νλ1+α. | (86) |
If we define the generalized Grashof number as
G(t)≤{(2νλ1+α)/[4C|Ω|ν2βλ1(L2fα2−L2fα1−2L2fα+1α)]}1/2=K0, | (87) |
which completes the proof for our first result.
Remark 4. Theorem 3.10 is a further research for the existence of pullback attractor in [6].
We first state some hypothesis on the external forces and sub-linear operator.
|dρdt|≤ρ∗<1, ∀t≥0. |
‖F(y)‖2H≤a(t)‖y‖2H+b(t), ∀t≥τ,y∈H. | (88) |
‖F(u)−F(v)‖H≤L(R)κ12(t)‖u−v‖H, u,v∈H. | (89) |
holds for
∫t−∞ems‖g(s,⋅)‖2Hds<∞, ∀t∈R. | (90) |
ν2−‖a‖Lqloc(R)1−ρ∗>0. | (91) |
In this part, the well-posedness and pullback attractors for problem (1) with sub-linear operator will be stated for our discussion in sequel.
Assume that the initial date
{u(t)+∫tτP(νAu+αu+β|u|u+γ|u|2u)ds=u(τ)+∫tτP(F(u(s−ρ(s)))+g(s,x))ds,w|∂Ω=0,u(t=τ)=uτ,u(τ+t)=ϕ(t), t∈[−h,0], | (92) |
which possesses a global mild solution as the following theorem.
Theorem 4.1. Assume that the external forces
‖u(t)‖2H+2ν∫tτ‖u(s)‖2Vds+2α∫tτ‖u(s)‖2Hds+2β∫tτ‖u(s)‖3L3ds+2γ∫tτ‖u(s)‖4L4ds=‖uτ‖2H+2∫tτ[(F(u(s−ρ(s))),u(s))+2(g(s,x),u(s))]ds. | (93) |
Moreover, we can define a continuous process
Proof. Using the Galerkin method and compact argument as in Section 3.3, we can easily derive the result.
After obtaining the existence of the global well-posedness, we establish the existence of the pullback attractors to (1) with sub-linear operator.
Theorem 4.2. (The pullback attractors in
Proof. Using the similar technique as in Section3.3, we can obtain the existence of pullback attractors, here we skip the details.
Theorem 4.3. We assume that the external forces
Then the trajectories inside pullback attractors
G(t)≤˜K0, | (94) |
where
˜K0={(2νλ1+α)/[2C|Ω|βνλ1(1α2(1−ρ∗)+‖˜a(t)‖L1)]}1/2>0, |
here
Proof. Step 1. The inequality for asymptotic stability of trajectories.
Let
u(θ+τ)|θ∈[−h,0]=ϕ(θ)|θ∈[−h,0], u|t=τ=uτ | (95) |
and
v(θ+τ)|θ∈[−h,0]=˜ϕ(θ)|θ∈[−h,0], v|t=τ=˜uτ | (96) |
respectively, then
(u,ut)=(U(t,τ)uτ,U(t,τ)ϕ), (v,vt)=(U(t,τ)˜uτ,U(t,τ)˜ϕ). | (97) |
If we denote
{∂w∂t+νAw+P(αw+β(|u|u−|v|v)+γ(|u|2u−|v|2v))=P(F(u(t−ρ(t)))−F(v(t−ρ(t)))),w|∂Ω=0,w(t=τ)=uτ−˜uτ,w(τ+θ)=ϕ(θ)−˜ϕ(θ), θ∈[−h,0]. | (98) |
Multiplying (98) with
12ddt‖w‖2H+ν‖w‖2V+α‖w‖2H+γγ0‖w‖4L4≤|β(|u|u−|v|v,w)|+|(F(u(t−ρ(t)))−F(v(t−ρ(t))),w)|≤C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖u‖2V)‖w‖2H+α2‖w‖2H+1α‖F(u(t−ρ(t)))−F(v(t−ρ(t)))‖2H≤C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖u‖2V)‖w‖2H+α2‖w‖2H+L2(R)κ(t)α‖w(t−ρ(t))‖2H. | (99) |
Using the Poincaré inequality and Lemma 3.1, noting that if
2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)>0, | (100) |
then we can obtain
‖w‖2H≤e∫tτ[2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)−(2νλ1+α)]ds[‖uτ−˜uτ‖2H++L2(R)‖κ(t)‖L∞α∫tτe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσ×‖w(t−ρ(t))‖2Hds]. | (101) |
Denoting
E(t,τ)=e−∫tτ[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]ds | (102) |
and
K1(t,s)=L2(R)‖κ(t)‖L∞αe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσ | (103) |
and
Θ=supt≥s≥τE(t,s), κ(K1,0)=supt≥τ∫tτK1(t,s)ds, | (104) |
by virtue of Lemma 3.2, choosing
‖w(t−ρ(t))‖2H≤˜M‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−˜λ(t−τ). | (105) |
Substituting (105) into (99), using Lemma 3.1 again, we can conclude the following estimate
‖w‖2H≤‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−∫tτ[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]ds+L2(R)‖κ(t)‖L∞α˜M‖uτ−˜uτ‖2He−˜λ(t−τ)×∫tτe−∫ts[2νλ1+α−2C|Ω|β(‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V)]dσds. | (106) |
From the result in last section, we can find that the pullback attractors is asymptotically stable as
2νλ1+α>2C|Ω|β⟨‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V⟩≤t. | (107) |
Step 2.Some energy estimate for (1) with sub-linear operator.
Multiplying (3) with
12ddt‖u‖2H+ν‖A1/2u‖2H+α‖u‖2H+β‖u‖3L3+γ‖u‖4L4≤α‖u‖2H+12α[‖f(t,u(t−ρ(t)))‖2H+‖g‖2H]. | (108) |
Moreover, let
dθ=(1−ρ′(s))ds, a(t)→˜a(ˉt)∈Lp(τ,T), | (109) |
which means
∫tτ‖f(s,u(s−ρ(s)))‖2Hds≤∫tτa(s)‖u(s−ρ(s))‖2Hds+∫Tτb(s)ds≤ 11−ρ∗∫t−ρ(t)τ−ρ(τ)˜a(s)‖u(s)‖2Hds+∫tτb(s)ds≤ 11−ρ∗(∫0−ρ(τ)˜a(t+τ)‖ϕ(t)‖2Hdt+∫tτ˜a(s)‖u(s)‖2Hds)+∫tτb(s)ds≤11−ρ∗(‖ϕ(t)‖2L2qH‖˜a‖Lq(τ−h,τ)+∫tτ˜a(s)‖u(s)‖2Hds)+∫tτb(s)ds, | (110) |
Integrating (108) with time variable from
‖u‖2H+2ν∫tτ‖u‖2Vds+2β∫tτ‖u‖3L3ds+2γ∫tτ‖u‖4L4ds≤‖˜a‖Lq(τ−h,τ)α(1−ρ∗)‖ϕ(t)‖2L2qH+‖uτ‖2H+1α(1−ρ∗)∫tτ˜a(s)‖u(s)‖2Hds+1α∫tτ‖g‖2Hds+1α∫tτb(s)ds, | (111) |
then we can achieve that
‖u(t)‖2H≤[‖˜a‖Lq(τ−h,τ)α(1−ρ∗)‖ϕ(t)‖2L2qH+‖uτ‖2H]e−χσ(t,τ)+1α∫tτ‖g‖2He−χσ(t,s)ds+1α∫tτb(s)e−χσ(t,s)ds, | (112) |
where the new variable index
χσ(t,s)=(2νλ1−σ)(t−s)−1α(1−ρ∗)∫ts˜a(r)dr, | (113) |
which satisfies the relations
χσ(0,t)−χσ(0,s)=−χσ(t,s) | (114) |
and
χσ(0,r)≤χσ(0,t)+(2νλ1−δ)h, if 2νλ1+α−δ>0 | (115) |
for
Moreover, using the variable index introduced above, we can conclude that
2ν∫tτ‖u(r)‖2Vdr≤‖˜a‖Lq(τ−h,τ)α(1−ρ∗)‖ϕ(t)‖2L2qH+‖uτ‖2H+1α∫tτ‖g‖2Hds+1α∫tτb(s)ds+1α(1−ρ∗)[‖˜a‖Lq(τ−h,τ)α(1−ρ∗)‖ϕ(t)‖2L2qH+‖uτ‖2H]∫tτ˜a(s)e−χσ(s,τ)ds+1α2(1−ρ∗)∫tτ‖g(s)‖2Hds∫tτ˜a(s)ds+‖b‖L1(τ,T)α2(1−ρ∗)∫tτ˜a(s)ds. | (116) |
Step 3. The sufficient condition for asymptotic stability of trajectories inside pullback attractors.
Combining (107) with (116), we conclude that
2C|Ω|β⟨‖u‖2V+‖v‖2V⟩|≤t≤2C|Ω|βν[(1α2(1−ρ∗)+∫tτ˜a(s)ds)⟨‖g(t)‖2H⟩|≤t+1α⟨‖b(t)‖L1⟩|≤t+‖b‖L1(τ,T)α2(1−ρ∗)⟨‖˜a(t)‖L1⟩|≤t]. | (117) |
and hence the asymptotic stability holds provided that
(1α2(1−ρ∗)+‖˜a(t)‖L1)⟨‖g(t)‖2H⟩|≤t+1α⟨‖b(t)‖L1⟩|≤t+‖b‖L1(τ,T)α2(1−ρ∗)⟨‖˜a(t)‖L1⟩|≤t≤ν(2νλ1+α)2C|Ω|β. | (118) |
If we define the generalized Grashof number as
G(t)≤{(2νλ1+α)/[2C|Ω|βνλ1(1α2(1−ρ∗)+‖˜a(t)‖L1)]}1/2=˜K0, | (119) |
which completes the proof for our first result.
Remark 5. If we denote
lim supτ→−∞1t−τ∫tτb(r)dr=b0∈[0,+∞) | (120) |
and
lim supτ→−∞1t−τ∫tτ˜a(r)dr=˜a0∈[0,+∞), | (121) |
such that there exists some
ν(2νλ1+α)2C|Ω|β>b0α+‖b‖L1(τ,T)˜α0α2(1−ρ∗)+δ | (122) |
holds. Then more precise sufficient condition for the asymptotic stability of pullback attractors is
G(t)≤[ν(2νλ1+α)2C|Ω|β−b0α−‖b‖L1(τ,T)˜α0α2(1−ρ∗)ν2λ1(1α2(1−ρ∗)+‖˜a(t)‖L1)]1/2 | (123) |
which has smaller upper boundedness than (119).
The structure and stability of 3D BF equations with delay are investigated in this paper. A future research in the pullback dynamics of (1) is to study the geometric property of pullback attractors, such as the fractal dimension.
Xin-Guang Yang was partially supported by the Fund of Young Backbone Teacher in Henan Province (No. 2018GGJS039) and Henan Overseas Expertise Introduction Center for Discipline Innovation (No. CXJD2020003). Xinjie Yan was partly supported by Excellent Innovation Team Project of "Analysis Theory of Partial Differential Equations" in China University of Mining and Technology (No. 2020QN003). Ling Ding was partly supported by NSFC of China (Grant No. 1196302).
The authors want to express their most sincere thanks to refrees for the improvement of this manuscript. The authors also want to thank Professors Tomás Caraballo (Universidad de Sevilla), Desheng Li (Tianjin University) and Shubin Wang (Zhengzhou University) for fruitful discussion on this subject.
[1] |
Diamond MS, Pierson TC (2020) The challenges of vaccine development against a new virus during a pandemic. Cell Host Microbe 27: 699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.021
![]() |
[2] |
Corey L, Mascola JR, Fauci AS, et al. (2020) A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R&D. Science 368: 948-950. doi: 10.1126/science.abc5312
![]() |
[3] |
Corman VM, Muth D, Niemeyer D, et al. (2018) Hosts and sources of endemic human coronaviruses. Advances in Virus Research Cambridge: Academic Press, 163-188. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.01.001
![]() |
[4] |
van Elden LJ, Anton M AM, van Alphen F, et al. (2004) Frequent detection of human coronaviruses in clinical specimens from patients with respiratory tract infection by use of a novel real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 189: 652-657. doi: 10.1086/381207
![]() |
[5] |
Holmes KV (1999) Coronaviruses (Coronaviridae). Encyclopedia of Virology Cambridge: Academic Press, 291. doi: 10.1006/rwvi.1999.0055
![]() |
[6] |
Dijkman R, Jebbink MF, El Idrissi NB, et al. (2008) Human coronavirus NL63 and 229E seroconversion in children. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2368-2373. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00533-08
![]() |
[7] |
Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, et al. (2003) Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1319-1325. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13077-2
![]() |
[8] |
Arabi Y, Arifi A, Balkhy H, et al. (2014) Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Ann Intern Med 160: 389-397. doi: 10.7326/M13-2486
![]() |
[9] |
Cha RH, Joh JS, Jeong I, et al. (2015) Renal complications and their prognosis in Korean patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus from the central MERS-CoV designated hospital. J Korean Med Sci 30: 1807-1814. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1807
![]() |
[10] |
Saad M, Omrani AS, Baig K, et al. (2014) Clinical aspects and outcomes of 70 patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection: a single-center experience in Saudi Arabia. Int J Infect Dis 29: 301-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.09.003
![]() |
[11] |
Baig AM (2020) Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. CNS Neurosci Ther 26: 499-501. doi: 10.1111/cns.13372
![]() |
[12] |
Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, et al. (2013) Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495: 251-254. doi: 10.1038/nature12005
![]() |
[13] |
Maslow JN (2017) Vaccine development for emerging virulent infectious diseases. Vaccine 35: 5437-5443. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.015
![]() |
[14] |
Oh MD, Choe PG, Oh HS, et al. (2015) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus superspreading event involving 81 persons, Korea 2015. J Korean Med Sci 30: 1701-1705. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1701
![]() |
[15] |
Gerdts V, Zakhartchouk A (2017) Vaccines for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and other swine coronaviruses. Vet Microbiol 206: 45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.11.029
![]() |
[16] |
de Wit JJS, Cook JKA (2019) Spotlight on avian pathology: infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 48: 393-395. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1617400
![]() |
[17] | Luo A (2020) Positive SARS-Cov-2 test in a woman with COVID-19 at 22 days after hospital discharge: A case report. J Tradit Chin Med Sci In press. |
[18] | Fu W, Chen Q, Wang T (2020) Letter to the Editor: Three cases of re‐detectable positive SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in recovered COVID‐19 patients with antibodies. J Med Virol In press. |
[19] |
Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, et al. (2020) Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol 92: 424-432. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25685
![]() |
[20] |
Li CK, Wu H, Yan H, et al. (2008) T cell responses to whole SARS coronavirus in humans. J Immunol 181: 5490-5500. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5490
![]() |
[21] |
Zhao J, Zhao J, Mangalam AK, et al. (2016) Airway memory CD4+ T cells mediate protective immunity against emerging respiratory coronaviruses. Immunity 44: 1379-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.006
![]() |
[22] | Prompetchara E, Ketloy C, Palaga T (2020) Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: Lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 38: 1-9. |
[23] |
Lurie N, Saville M, Hatchett R, et al. (2020) Developing Covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. New Engl J Med 382: 1969-1973. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005630
![]() |
[24] |
de Haan CA, Rottier PJ (2005) Molecular interactions in the assembly of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res 64: 165-230. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(05)64006-7
![]() |
[25] |
Baruah V, Bose S (2020) Immunoinformatics-aided identification of T cell and B cell epitopes in the surface glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol 92: 495-500. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25698
![]() |
[26] |
Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, et al. (2004) A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 428: 561-564. doi: 10.1038/nature02463
![]() |
[27] |
Deming D, Sheahan T, Heise M, et al. (2006) Vaccine efficacy in senescent mice challenged with recombinant SARS-CoV bearing epidemic and zoonotic spike variants. PLoS Med 3: e525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030525
![]() |
[28] |
Graham RL, Becker MM, Eckerle LD, et al. (2012) A live, impaired-fidelity coronavirus vaccine protects in an aged, immunocompromised mouse model of lethal disease. Nat Med 18: 1820. doi: 10.1038/nm.2972
![]() |
[29] |
Liu W, Fontanet A, Zhang PH, et al. (2006) Two-year prospective study of the humoral immune response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J Infect Dis 193: 792-795. doi: 10.1086/500469
![]() |
[30] |
Tang F, Quan Y, Xin ZT, et al. (2011) Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J Immunol 186: 7264-7268. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903490
![]() |
[31] |
Boonnak K, Slike BM, Burgess TH, et al. (2008) Role of dendritic cells in antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. J Virol 82: 3939-3951. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02484-07
![]() |
[32] |
Murphy BR, Prince GA, Walsh EE, et al. (1986) Dissociation between serum neutralizing and glycoprotein antibody responses of infants and children who received inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. J Clin Microbiol 24: 197-202. doi: 10.1128/JCM.24.2.197-202.1986
![]() |
[33] |
Taylor A, Foo SS, Bruzzone R, et al. (2015) Fc receptors in antibody‐dependent enhancement of viral infections. Immunol Rev 268: 340-364. doi: 10.1111/imr.12367
![]() |
[34] |
Winarski KL, Tang J, Klenow L, et al. (2019) Antibody-dependent enhancement of influenza disease promoted by increase in hemagglutinin stem flexibility and virus fusion kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 15194-15199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821317116
![]() |
[35] |
Jaume M, Yip MS, Cheung CY, et al. (2011) Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike antibodies trigger infection of human immune cells via a pH-and cysteine protease-independent FcγR pathway. J Virol 85: 10582-10597. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00671-11
![]() |
[36] |
Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, et al. (2014) Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem Bioph Res Co 451: 208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.090
![]() |
[37] |
Kam YW, Kien F, Roberts A, et al. (2006) Antibodies against trimeric S glycoprotein protect hamsters against SARS-CoV challenge despite their capacity to mediate FcRII-dependent entry into B cells in vitro. Vaccine 25: 729-740. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.08.011
![]() |
[38] | Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, et al. (2020) Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J Virol 94. |
[39] |
Dijstelbloem HM, Kallenberg CG, van de Winkel JG (2001) Inflammation in autoimmunity: receptors for IgG revisited. Trends Immunol 22: 510-516. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02014-2
![]() |
[40] |
Baudino L, Nimmerjahn F, da Silveira SA, et al. (2008) Differential contribution of three activating IgG Fc receptors (FcγRI, FcγRIII, and FcγRIV) to IgG2a-and IgG2b-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia in mice. J Immunol 180: 1948-1953. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1948
![]() |
[41] |
Jacobs JJ (2020) Neutralizing antibodies mediate virus-immune pathology of COVID-19. Med Hypotheses 30: 109884. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109884
![]() |
[42] |
Wang S, Guo F, Liu K, et al. (2008) Endocytosis of the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein together with virus receptor ACE2. Virus Res 136: 8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.03.004
![]() |
[43] |
Huang IC, Bosch BJ, Li F, et al. (2006) SARS coronavirus, but not human coronavirus NL63, utilizes cathepsin L to infect ACE2-expressing cells. J Biol Chem 281: 3198-3203. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508381200
![]() |
[44] |
Yip MS, Leung NH, Cheung CY, et al. (2014) Antibody-dependent infection of human macrophages by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Virol J 11: 82. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-82
![]() |
[45] |
Yuan FF, Tanner J, Chan PK, et al. (2005) Influence of FcγRIIA and MBL polymorphisms on severe acute respiratory syndrome. Tissue Antigens 66: 291-296. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2005.00476.x
![]() |
[46] | Quinlan BD, Mou H, Zhang L, et al. (2020) The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicits a potent neutralizing response without antibody-dependent enhancement. Immunity In press. |
[47] |
de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, et al. (2016) SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 523. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81
![]() |
[48] |
Tseng CT, Sbrana E, Iwata-Yoshikawa N, et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PloS One 7: e35421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
![]() |
[49] |
Deming D, Sheahan T, Heise M, et al. (2006) Vaccine efficacy in senescent mice challenged with recombinant SARS-CoV bearing epidemic and zoonotic spike variants. PLoS Med 3: e525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030525
![]() |
[50] |
Bolles M, Deming D, Long K, et al. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J Virol 85: 12201-12215. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06048-11
![]() |
[51] | Liu L, Wei Q, Lin Q, et al. (2019) Anti-spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection. JCI Insight 4. |
[52] | Pinto D, Park YJ, Beltramello M, et al. (2020) Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody. Nature 18: 1-10. |
[53] |
Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H, et al. (2020) Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 369: 77-81. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1932
![]() |
[54] | van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer A, et al. (2020) ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature 30: 1-8. |
[55] | Corbett KS, Flynn B, Foulds KE, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. New Engl J Med In press. |
[56] |
Zhang L, Zhang F, Yu W, et al. (2006) Antibody responses against SARS coronavirus are correlated with disease outcome of infected individuals. J Med Virol 78: 1-8. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20499
![]() |
[57] |
Ho MS, Chen WJ, Chen HY, et al. (2005) Neutralizing antibody response and SARS severity. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 1730. doi: 10.3201/eid1111.040659
![]() |
[58] |
Lee N, Chan PK, Ip M, et al. (2006) Anti-SARS-CoV IgG response in relation to disease severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome. J Clin Virol 35: 179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2005.07.005
![]() |
[59] | To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS, et al. (2020) Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 565-574. |
[60] | Huang J, Mao T, Li S, et al. (2020) Dynamics of Viral Load and Antibodies in First 8 Weeks of Infection by SARS-CoV-2: An Observational Cohort Study. Lancet In press. |
[61] |
Cheng Y, Wong R, Soo Y, et al. (2005) Use of convalescent plasma therapy in SARS patients in Hong Kong. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24: 44-46. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1271-9
![]() |
[62] |
Keith P (2020) A novel treatment approach to the novel coronavirus: an argument for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange for fulminant COVID-19. Crit Care 24: 128. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2836-4
![]() |
[63] |
Liu Q, Zhou YH, Yang ZQ (2016) The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell Mol Immunol 13: 3-10. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.74
![]() |
[64] |
Sullivan N, Yang ZY, Nabel GJ (2003) Ebola virus pathogenesis: implications for vaccines and therapies. J Virol 77: 9733-9737. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9733-9737.2003
![]() |
[65] | Chen C, Zhang XR, Ju ZY, et al. (2020) Advances in the research of cytokine storm mechanism induced by Corona Virus Disease 2019 and the corresponding immunotherapies. Chinese J Burns 36: E005. |
[66] |
Schindewolf C, Menachery VD, et al. (2019) Middle east respiratory syndrome vaccine candidates: cautious optimism. Viruses 11: 74. doi: 10.3390/v11010074
![]() |
[67] |
Henderson LA, Canna SW, Schulert GS, et al. (2020) On the alert for cytokine storm: Immunopathology in COVID‐19. Arthritis Rheumatol 22: 1059-1063. doi: 10.1002/art.41285
![]() |
[68] |
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. (2020) COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395: 1033-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0
![]() |
[69] |
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395: 497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
![]() |
[70] |
Liu J, Li S, Liu J (2020) Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EbioMedicine 55: 102763. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102763
![]() |
1. | Qiangheng Zhang, Yangrong Li, Regular attractors of asymptotically autonomous stochastic 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with delays, 2021, 20, 1534-0392, 3515, 10.3934/cpaa.2021117 | |
2. | Pan Zhang, Lan Huang, Rui Lu, Xin-Guang Yang, Pullback dynamics of a 3D modified Navier-Stokes equations with double delays, 2021, 29, 2688-1594, 4137, 10.3934/era.2021076 | |
3. | Shu Wang, Mengmeng Si, Rong Yang, Dynamics of stochastic 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equations on unbounded domains, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 904, 10.3934/era.2023045 | |
4. | Yang Liu, Chunyou Sun, Inviscid limit for the damped generalized incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on T2, 2021, 14, 1937-1632, 4383, 10.3934/dcdss.2021124 | |
5. | Shu Wang, Mengmeng Si, Rong Yang, Random attractors for non-autonomous stochastic Brinkman-Forchheimer equations on unbounded domains, 2022, 21, 1534-0392, 1621, 10.3934/cpaa.2022034 | |
6. | Wenjing Liu, Rong Yang, Xin-Guang Yang, Dynamics of a 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with infinite delay, 2021, 20, 1553-5258, 1907, 10.3934/cpaa.2021052 | |
7. | Ling-Rui Zhang, Xin-Guang Yang, Ke-Qin Su, Asymptotic Stability for the 2D Navier–Stokes Equations with Multidelays on Lipschitz Domain, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 4561, 10.3390/math10234561 | |
8. | Xiaona Cui, Wei Shi, Xuezhi Li, Xin‐Guang Yang, Pullback dynamics for the 3‐D incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with damping and delay, 2021, 44, 0170-4214, 7031, 10.1002/mma.7239 | |
9. | Zhengwang Tao, Xin-Guang Yang, Yan Lin, Chunxiao Guo, Determination of Three-Dimensional Brinkman—Forchheimer-Extended Darcy Flow, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 146, 10.3390/fractalfract7020146 | |
10. | Yonghai Wang, Minhui Hu, Yuming Qin, Upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for a nonautonomous damped wave equation, 2021, 2021, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-021-01532-7 | |
11. | Xueli SONG, Xi DENG, Baoming QIAO, Dimension Estimate of the Global Attractor for a 3D Brinkman- Forchheimer Equation, 2023, 28, 1007-1202, 1, 10.1051/wujns/2023281001 | |
12. | Songmao He, Xin-Guang Yang, Asymptotic behavior of 3D Ladyzhenskaya-type fluid flow model with delay, 2024, 0, 1937-1632, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2024135 | |
13. | Lingrui Zhang, Xue-zhi Li, Keqin Su, Dynamical behavior of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony system with finite distributed delay in 3D, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 6881, 10.3934/era.2023348 | |
14. | Xinfeng Ge, Keqin Su, Stability of thermoelastic Timoshenko system with variable delay in the internal feedback, 2024, 32, 2688-1594, 3457, 10.3934/era.2024160 | |
15. | Keqin Su, Xin-Guang Yang, Alain Miranville, He Yang, Dynamics and robustness for the 2D Navier–Stokes equations with multi-delays in Lipschitz-like domains, 2023, 134, 18758576, 513, 10.3233/ASY-231845 | |
16. | Lingrui Zhang, Xue-zhi Li, Keqin Su, Dynamical behavior of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony system with finite distributed delay in 3D, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 6881, 10.3934/era.20233348 |