Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Situational Analysis for Complex Systems: Methodological Development in Public Health Research

1 College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
2 School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

Public health systems have suffered infrastructure losses worldwide. Strengthening public health systems requires not only good policies and programs, but also development of new research methodologies to support public health systems renewal. Our research team considers public health systems to be complex adaptive systems and as such new methods are necessary to generate knowledge about the process of implementing public health programs and services. Within our program of research, we have employed situational analysis as a method for studying complex adaptive systems in four distinct research studies on public health program implementation. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the use of situational analysis as a method for studying complex systems and highlight the need for further methodological development.
  Article Metrics


1. Di Ruggiero E, Frank J, Moloughney B (2004) Strengthen Canada's public health system now. Canadian J Public Health 95: 5, 11.

2. Baker EL, Melton RJ, Stange PV, et al. (1994) Health reform and the health of the public: Forging community health partnerships. JAMA 272: 1276-1282.    

3. Plianbangchang S (2007) Inauguration of University of Public Health, Address, 16 July 2007, Yangon Myanmar. In: Organization WH, editor. New Delhi: Who Regional Office for South-East Asia.

4. MacDonald M, Hancock T, Wilson Strosher H (2007) Developing a research agenda on the implementaiton and impact of Core Public Health Functions in British Columbia. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.

5. MacDonald M (2011) Developing a program of research for an applied public health chair in public health education and population intervention research. Can J Nursing Res 43: 119-124.

6. Tomm-Bonde L, Schreiber RS, Allan D, et al. (2013) Fading vision: knowledge translation in teh implementation of a public health policy intervention. Implementation Sci 8: 1-11.    

7. Anderson RA, Crabtree BF, Steele DJ, et al. (2005) Case Study Research: The View From Complexity Science. Qualitative Health Research 15: 669-685    

8. Pettigrew, A.M., Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization science, 1990. 1(3): p. 267-292.

9. Poland B, Frohlich KL, Cargo M (2008) Context as a fundamental dimension of health promotion evaluation. In: Potvin L, McQueen D, editors. Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: Values and research. New York: Springer. pp. 299-318.

10. Edwards N, Di Ruggiero E (2011) Exploring which context matters in the study of health inequities and their mitigation. Scandinavian J Public Health 39(Suppl 6): 43-49.

11. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, et al. (2002) Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiology and Community Health 56: 119-127.    

12. Clarke AE (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

13. Martin W (2014) Food Gone Foul? Food Safety and Security Tensions. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria. 359 p.

14. Hamm MW, Bellows AC (2003) Community Food Security and Nutrition Educators. J Nutri Edu & Behav 35: 37-43.

15. Thrift N (1999) The place of complexity. Theory, Culture & Society 16: 31-69.

16. Castellani B, Hafferty F (2009) Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. Berlin: Springer.

17. Capra F (1996) The Web of Life. New York: Anchor Books.

18. Holland JH (1992) Complex Adaptive Systems. Daedalus 121: 17-30.

19. Zimmerman B, Lindberg C, Plsek P (2001) Edgeware: Insights from Complexity Science for Health Care Leaders. Irving: VHA Inc.

20. Tremblay M-C, Richard L (2011) Complexity: a potential paradigm for a health promotion discipline. Health Promotion Inter 29(2): 378-388.

21. Glaser B, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

22. Strauss AL (1978) A Social Worlds Perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1: 119-128.

23. Clarke AE (1991) Social worlds/arenas theory as organizational theory. In: Maines DR, editor. Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc. pp. 119-157.

24. Charmaz K, Morse JM (2009) Shifting the grounds: Constructivists grounded theory methods. Developing Grounded Theory: Teh Second Generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press Inc. pp. 127-193.

25. Strauss AL (1993) Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.

26. Healy K, Moody J (2014) Data Visualization in Sociology. Annual Rev Soci 40: 105-128.    

27. Mead GH (1938) The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28. Food Security Working Group (2006) Model core program paper: Food Security. Victoria, BC: Population Health and Wellness, BC Ministry of Health.

29. Allen P (2008) Mining for justice in the food system: perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Agriculture Human Values 25: 157-161.    

30. Province of British Columbia. (2008). Bill 23 Public Health Act.

31. (2012) Safe Foods for Canadians Act, in Statutes of Canada 2012. First Session.

32. Labonte R (1993) Health Promotion & Empowerment: Practice Frameworks. Toronto: Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto.

33. Lubell M (2007) Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. J Politics 69: 237-250.

34. Wittman H, Desmarais AA, Wiebe N, editors (2011) Food Sovereignty in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

35. Blouin C, Lemay JF, Konforti L, et al. (2009) Local food systems and public policy: A review of the literature. Equiterre & The Centre for Trade Policy and Law, Carleton University.

36. Pimbert M (2010) Towards Food Sovereignty: Reclaiming autonomous food systems. London: The International Institute for Environment and Development.

37. Holland JH (1995) Hidden Order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York: Basic Books.

38. Schreiber RS, Martin W (2013) New directions in grounded theory. In: Beck CT, editor. Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Nursing Research. New York: Routledge. pp. 183-199.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Wanda Martin, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved