AIMS Geosciences, 2018, 4(1): 66-87. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2018.1.66.

Research article

Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Wild life habitat suitability and conservation hotspot mapping: Remote Sensing and GIS based decision support system

1 Vindhyan Ecology and Natural History Foundation, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Environment and Forest, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, India

Background: The environment and habitat are the important aspects of the forest ecosystem. The continuous changes in the environment due to natural phenomenon or human actions have degraded the forest and wildlife habitat thus causing a decline in their population. Therefore it is important to study wildlife habitat in order to ensure their survival. In this regard, application of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System has been widely accepted as a tool which has immense significance in wildlife habitat suitability modeling and mapping. Maps derived from analysis of remote sensing data and modeling in GIS are highly useful in making the strategies in wildlife management and conservation planning. Objectives: The objectives of the study are to identify the suitable habitat for wild life and conservation hotspot grids were delineated which require immediate attention. Methods/Statistical analysis: The wildlife habitat suitability parameter based on forest cover, agriculture with settlement, forest fires, roads, streams and mines were analyzed. The statistical method such as pairwise comparison was used to evaluate the weightage of each parameter which helped to determine the wildlife habitat suitability modeling and mapping. Findings: The study of wildlife habitat suitability mapping in Saranda forest division reveals 42% of the grid equal to 1898 has very high suitability for wild life. The conservation hotspot reserve grid based on contiguous patch was identified within the very high wildlife suitability habitat was found to be 925 (49%). Application/Improvements: Conservation effort can be focused based on the above study and will assist in policy related decision making.
  Article Metrics

Keywords forest fire; GIS; DEM; wild life habitat; conservation hotspot; Saranda; Jharkhand

Citation: Firoz Ahmad, Laxmi Goparaju, Abdul Qayum. Wild life habitat suitability and conservation hotspot mapping: Remote Sensing and GIS based decision support system. AIMS Geosciences, 2018, 4(1): 66-87. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2018.1.66


  • 1. Kauzeni AS (1995) A Paradigm for Community Wildlife Management: The Case of Protected Areas of the Serengeti Region Ecosystem. Research paper No. 37 (New Series). Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam.
  • 2. Kideghesho JR, Roskaft E, Kaltenborn BP, et al. (2005) Serengeti shall not die: Can the ambition be sustained? Int J Biodiversity Sci Manage 1: 150–166.    
  • 3. Priyadarshini N (2008) Impact of mining and industries in Jharkhand'. Available from: (Accessed on 22nd March 2017).
  • 4. Sethi N, Singh R (2014) Firms allowed mining rights in Saranda forests to face scrutiny. Available from: (Accessed on 22nd March 2017).
  • 5. Integrated Wildlife Management Plan for West Singhbhum. Jharkhand, 2013. Available from:,%20jharkhand.pdf (Accessed on 15th January 2017).
  • 6. Lambert J (2016) Outcry as adivasi activist Gladson Dungdung is prevented from travelling to the UK. Available from: (Accessed on 22nd March 2017).
  • 7. Dungdung G (2015) Mission Saranda. Publisher: Desaj Prakashan, Bihar-Jharkhand, 75, ISBN 978-81-908959-8-9.
  • 8. Ahmad F, Goparaju L (2016a) Analysis of Urban Sprawl Dynamics Using Geospatial Technology in Ranchi City, Jharkhand, India. J Environ Geogr 9: 7–13.
  • 9. Ahmad F, Goparaju L (2016b) Geospatial Technology in Urban Forest suitability: Analysis for Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Ecol Quest 24: 45–58.
  • 10. Ahmad F, Goparaju L (2017a) Spatio-temporal dynamics of mines in Singrauli, India: An analysis using geospatial technology. J Geomatics 11: 53–59.
  • 11. Ahmad F, Goparaju L (2017b) Geospatial assessment of forest fires in Jharkhand (India) Indian journal of science and technology. Indian J Sci Technol 10: 7.
  • 12. Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2017a) Natural Resource Mapping Using Landsat and Lidar towards Identifying Digital Elevation, Digital Surface and Canopy Height Models. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res 2: 555580.
  • 13. Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2017b) LULC analysis of urban spaces using Markov chain predictive model at Ranchi in India. Spat Inf Res 2017: 1–9.
  • 14. Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2017c) Studying malaria epidemic for vulnerability zones: Multi-criteria approach of geospatial tools. J Geosci Environ Prot 5: 30–53.
  • 15. Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2017d) Agroforestry suitability analysis based upon nutrient availability mapping: A GIS based suitability mapping. AIMS Agric Food 2: 201–220.
  • 16. Yamada K, Elith J, Mccarthy M, et al. (2003) Eliciting and integrating expert knowledge for wildlife habitat modelling. Ecol Modell 165: 251–264.    
  • 17. Dash PP, Joshi PK, Roy PS, et al. (2015) Predictive habitat suitability modeling for prey and predator (Tiger) in Palamau Tiger Reserve. India Int J Int Sci 6: 2278–1145.
  • 18. Parihar JS, Panigrahy S, (1986) Remote sensing based habitat assessment of Kaziranga National Park, In: Kamat D.S. and Panwar H.S. (Eds.), Wildlife habitat evaluation using remote sensing techniques, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing/Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, 157–164.
  • 19. Porwal MC, Roy PS, Chellamuthu V (1996) Wildlife habitat analysis for sambar (Cervus unicolor) in Kanha National Park using remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 17: 2683–2697.    
  • 20. Kushwaha SPS, Munkhtuya S, Roy PS (2001) Mountain goat habitat evaluation in Rajaji National Park using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 28: 293–303.
  • 21. Sanare JE, Ganawa ES, Abdelrahim AMS (2015) Wildlife Habitat Suitability Analysis at Serengeti National Park (SNP), Tanzania Case Study Loxodonta sp. J Ecosyst Ecogr 5: 164.
  • 22. Chakravartty A (2014) SAIL gets pristine forest to mine. Available from: (Accessed on 22nd March 2017).
  • 23. Bera S (2012) Between Maoists and Mines. Available from: (Accessed on 22nd March 2017).
  • 24. Al-Harbi KS (2001) Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Proj Manage 19: 19–27.    
  • 25. Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Anal Hierarchy Process 458.
  • 26. Carrilho MAP (2015) The use of analytical hierarchy process in spatial decision support system for land use management. J Am Psychoanalytic Association 56: 1342–1348.
  • 27. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International, New York.
  • 28. Sarkar A, Ghosh A, Banik P (2014) Multi-criteria land evaluation for suitability analysis of wheat: A case study of a watershed in eastern plateau region, India. Geospatial Inf Sci 17: 119–128.    
  • 29. Ahmad F, Goparaju L (2017c) Soil and Water Conservation Prioritization Using Geospatial Technology-a Case Study of Part of Subarnarekha Basin, Jharkhand, India. AIMS Geosci 3: 375–395.
  • 30. Roy PS (2003) Forest fire and degradation assessment using satellite remote sensing and geographic information system fire and degradation assessment using satellite remote sensing and geographic information system. Satell Remote Sens GIS Appl Agric Meteorol 361–400.
  • 31. Engstrom RT (2010) First-order fire effects on animals: Review and recommendations. Fire Ecol 6: 131–150.    
  • 32. Fr YS, Molina JR, González-Cabán A, et al. (2012) Economic vulnerability of timber resources to forest fires. J Environ Manage 100: 16–21.    
  • 33. Chen Z (2006) Effects of fire on major forest ecosystem process: An overview. Chin J Appl Ecol 17: 1726–1732.
  • 34. Tropical T (2001) Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Impacts of human-caused fires on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and their causes in tropical, temperate and boreal forest biomes. Montreal, SCBD.42p. (CBD Technical Series no. 5).
  • 35. Chowdhury S (2006) Conservation of the Asian elephant in Central India. Gajah 25: 37–45.
  • 36. Bey A, Sánchezpaus Díaz A, Maniatis D, et al. (2016) Collect Earth: Land use and land cover assessment through augmented visual interpretation. Remote Sens 8: 807.    
  • 37. Malarvizhi K, Kumar SV, Porchelvan P (2015) Use of High Resolution Google Earth Satellite Imagery in Landuse Map Preparation for Urban Related Applications. Proc Technol 24: 1835–1842.
  • 38. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.
  • 39. Kayet N, Pathak K (2015) Remote Sensing and GIS Based Land use/Land cover Change Detection Mapping in Saranda Forest, Jharkhand, India. Int Res J Earth Sci 3: 1–6.
  • 40. Kayet N, Pathak K, Chakrabarty A, et al. (2016) Spatial impact of land use/land cover change on surface temperature distribution in Saranda Forest, Jharkhand Model. Earth Syst Environ 2: 127.    
  • 41. Wilkie D, Shaw E, Rotberg F, et al. (2000) Roads, development, and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conserv Biol 14: 1614–1622.    
  • 42. Codron J, Codron D, Lee-Thorp JA, et al. (2011) Landscape-scale feeding patterns of African elephant inferred from carbon isotope analysis of feces. Oecologia 165: 89–99.    
  • 43. MoEFCC (2016) Carrying Capacity study of Saranda and Chaibasa forest divisions. Available from:
  • 44. Reddy CS, Khuroo AA, Harikrishna P, et al. (2014) Threat Evaluation for Biodiversity Conservation of Forest Ecosystems using Geospatial techniques: A case study of Odisha, India. Ecol Eng 69: 287–303.    
  • 45. Rodriguez JP, Balch JK, Rodriguez-Clark KM (2007) Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: Quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems. Biodiversity Conserv 16: 183–209.    
  • 46. Reddy CS, Pasha SV, Jha CS, et al. (2015) Geospatial characterization of deforestation, fragmentation and forest fires in Telangana state, India: conservation perspective. Environ Monit Assess 187: 455.    
  • 47. Ceausu S, Gomes I, Pereira HM (2015) Conservation Planning for Biodiversity and Wilderness: A Real-world Example. Environ Manage 55: 1168–1180.    
  • 48. Bierregaard RO, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, et al. (2001) Lessons from Amazonia: The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. ISBN 0-300-08483-8.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Somaye Vaissi, Mozafar Sharifi, Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis with a GIS-based siting procedure to select a protected area for the Kaiser's mountain newt, Neurergus kaiseri (Caudata: Salamandridae), Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019, e00738, 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00738
  • 2. Tanoy Mukherjee, Lalit Kumar Sharma, Goutam K. Saha, Mukesh Thakur, Kailash Chandra, Past, Present and Future: Combining habitat suitability and future landcover simulation for long-term conservation management of Indian rhino, Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-57547-0
  • 3. Nazimur Rahman Talukdar, Parthankar Choudhury, Firoz Ahmad, Raihan Ahmed, Firoz Ahmad, Hassan Al-Razi, Habitat suitability of the Asiatic elephant in the trans-boundary Patharia Hills Reserve Forest, northeast India, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2020, 10.1007/s40808-020-00805-x
  • 4. Nazimur Rahman Talukdar, Parthankar Choudhury, Firoz Ahmad, Hassan Al-Razi, Raihan Ahmed, Mapping and assessing the transboundary elephant corridor in the Patharia Hills Reserve Forest of Assam, India, Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2020, 10.1016/j.rama.2020.05.001

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved