Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

To BIM or not to BIM? Lessons learned from a Greek vernacular museum building

Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia street 3, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia

Special Issues: Green built environment

The environmental impact of buildings has stimulated efforts to promote sustainable development in the construction sector. Technological development aims to provide an effective framework for the design, construction, and management of buildings through the use of tools such as Building Information Modeling (BIM). This paper critically assesses the use of BIM technology in vernacular design and analysis through the case study of a Greek vernacular museum building. Based on software application as well as in-situ observation and interviews, accurate energy analysis and safety were proved to be important advantages achieved through BIM technology. On the contrary, the inability to capture tacit knowledge and the lack of adaptability to local specificities appear to be the main weaknesses of BIM technology. Certain measures to enhance the use of BIM technology for the design and analysis of vernacular buildings are proposed.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords Building Information Modeling (BIM); standardization; sustainability; design; construction; energy analysis; vernacular architecture

Citation: Christina Priavolou. To BIM or not to BIM? Lessons learned from a Greek vernacular museum building. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 192-207. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020012

References

  • 1. Wong JKW, Kuan KL (2014) Implementing "BEAM Plus" for BIM-based sustainability analysis. Automat Constr 44: 163-175.    
  • 2. Dong YH, Ng ST (2015) A life cycle assessment model for evaluating the environmental impacts of building construction in Hong Kong. Build Environ 89: 183-191.
  • 3. Koeppel S, Urge-Vorsatz D (2007) Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings, Paris, France, UNEP.
  • 4. Rode P, Burdett R, Soares Gonçalves JC (2011) Buildings: investing in energy and resource efficiency, In UNEP, Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication.
  • 5. Mirabella N, Röck M, Saade MRM, et al. (2018) Strategies to improve the energy performance of buildings: A review of their life cycle impact. Build 8: 105-122.    
  • 6. Priavolou C, Niaros V (2019) Assessing the openness and conviviality of open source technology: The case of the WikiHouse. Sustain 11: 4746.    
  • 7. Wetter Μ (2011) A view on future building system modeling and simulation, In Hensen J. and R. Lamberts (eds), Building performance simulation for design and operation, Routledge, London.
  • 8. Faludi J, Lepech MD, Loisos G (2012) Using Life Cycle Assessment methods to guide architectural decision-making for sustainable prefabricated modular buildings. J Green Build 7: 151-170.    
  • 9. Kreider R, Messner J (2013) The uses of BIM: Classifying and selecting BIM uses, Version 0.9, September, The Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.
  • 10. Kunz J, Gilligan B (2007) VDC/BIM Use in 2007: Significant value, dramatic growth, and apparent business opportunity, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering Technical Report, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • 11. Rosenberg T (2006) Building Information Modeling, Roetzel & Andress. Available from http://www.academia.edu/1283324/Building_Information_Modeling.
  • 12. Bernstein P, Pittman J (2004) Barriers to the adoption of Building Information Modeling in the building industry, Autodesk Buildings Solutions, San Rafael, California.
  • 13. Curl JS (2006) A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 14. Gruen JP (2017) Vernacular architecture, In Encyclopedia of local history, 3rd eds, Amy H. Wilson, 697-698.
  • 15. Salman M (2018) Sustainability and vernacular architecture: Rethinking what identity is, Urban and architectural heritage conservation within sustainability, Kabila Hmood, IntechOpen.
  • 16. Nguyena AT, Truong NSH, Rockwood D, et al. (2019) Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation. Front Archit Res 8:535-548.    
  • 17. Huang Z, Yu M, Zheng L, et al. (2017) One-year Field Study on Indoor Environment of Huizhou Traditional Vernacular Dwellings in China. Proc Eng 205:1316-1322.    
  • 18. McLennan JF (2006) The philosophy of sustainable design, Kansas City, MO: EcoTone.
  • 19. Erarslan A (2019) A contemporary interpretation of vernacular architecture. The architecture of Nail Çakirhan, Turkey. Build Environ 7:5-25.
  • 20. Dayaratne R (2018) Toward sustainable development: lessons from vernacular settlements of Sri Lanka. Front Archit Res 7:334-346.    
  • 21. Kamarudin Z (2015) Long-roofed houses of northeastern peninsular Malaysia: sustainability of its identity in the built environment. Proc Environ Sci 28:698-707.    
  • 22. Barbero-Barrera MM, Gil-Crespo IJ, Maldonado-Ramos L (2014) Historical development and environment adaptation of the traditional cave-dwellings in Tajuña's valley, Madrid, Spain. Build Environ 82:536-545.    
  • 23. Dutton W, Peltu M (1996) Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 24. Björk BC (1995) Requirements and information structures for building product data models, PhD Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo Finland.
  • 25. National Institute of building sciences, About the national BIM standard-United States, 2019. Available from https://www.nationalbimstandard.org/about.
  • 26. Turk Ž (2016) Ten questions concerning Building Information Modelling. Build Environ 107: 274-284.    
  • 27. Ciribini A, Mastrolembo Ventura S, Paneroni M (2016) Implementation of an interoperable process to optimise design and construction phases of a residential building: a BIM pilot project. Automat Constr 71: 62-73.    
  • 28. Lahdou R, Zetterman D (2011) BIM for project managers, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Division of Construction Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
  • 29. Carvalho JP, Bragança L, Mateus R (2019) Optimising building sustainability assessment using BIM. Automat Constr 102:170-182.    
  • 30. Migilinskas D, Popov V, Juocevicius V, et al. (2013) The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Proc Eng 57: 767-774.    
  • 31. Bui N, Merschbrock C, Munkvold, BE, et al. (2019) The role of an innovation community in supporting BIM deployment - The case of buildingSMART Norway. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations, Seville, Spain.
  • 32. Laakso M, Kiviniemi A (2012) The IFC Standard-A review of history, development, and standardization. Electr J ITcon 17: 134-161.
  • 33. Oh M, Lee J, Wan Hong S et al. (2015) Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design. Automat Constr 58: 196-206.    
  • 34. Lee D (2008) Identifying sustainability priorities and engaging stakeholders-The Hong Kong housing authority's challenges and experience, Hong Kong Housing Authority, Hong Kong.
  • 35. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, et al. (2011) BIM handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
  • 36. Heywood H (2019) 101 rules of thumb for sustainable buildings and cities, 1st eds, London: RIBA Publishing, 224 pages.
  • 37. Wong K, Fan Q (2013) Building information modelling (BIM) for sustainable building design. Facilit 31: 138-157.    
  • 38. Gervásio H, Santos P, Martins R, et al. (2014) A macro-component approach for the assessment of building sustainability in early stages of design. Build Environ 73: 256-270.    
  • 39. Khasreen M, Banfill PF, Menzies G (2009) Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: A review. Sustain 1: 1-28.    
  • 40. Wong JKW, Zhou J (2015) Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Automat Constr 57: 156-165.    
  • 41. Oti AH, Tizani W (2015) BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual steel design. Adv Eng Inform 29: 28-46.    
  • 42. Azhar S, Carlton WA, Olsen D, et al. (2011) Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis. Automat Constr 20: 217-224.    
  • 43. Krygiel E, Nies B (2008) Green BIM: Successful sustainable design with Building Information Modeling, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • 44. Garmulewicz A (2015) 3D printing in the commons: knowledge and the nature of digital and physical resources. Doctoral thesis. University of Oxford.
  • 45. Moon HJ, Choi MS, Kim SK, et al. (2011) Case studies for the evaluation of interoperability between a BIM based architectural model and building performance analysis programs. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association.
  • 46. Miettinen R, Paavola S (2014) Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of Building Information Modeling. Automat Constr 43: 84-91.    
  • 47. Yin RK (2002) Case study research design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • 48. Verner JM, Abdullah LM (2012) Exploratory case study research: Outsourced project failure. Inform Soft Tech 54: 866-886.    
  • 49. Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12: 219-245.    
  • 50. Pavlos Vrellis Museum of Greek history of wax effigies, Prologue-Introduction, 2019. Available from https://www.vrellis.gr/ep/.

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved